China's SECRET $13 Billion Aircraft Carrier SHOCKED America , Iran, and Russia

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • Has China threatened the United States’ sea supremacy with its newly developed aircraft carrier? Well, this might be the case because this newly developed sea beast is equipped with the required capabilities to overthrow the renowned USS Gerald and strengthen China’s naval capabilities. This unexpected development has shocked not only the United States, a nation that boasts of being at the fore-front of technological advancement but also Iran and Russia. How is this newly developed Aircraft better than the United States ship? How did the United States respond to this imminent threat?
    Subscribe Here → / @realhyperspeed
    #Hyperspeed

КОМЕНТАРІ • 278

  • @TomSimba
    @TomSimba 3 місяці тому +85

    How can a behemoth like this be a secret? China's reason for building these carriers is for defense against relentless threats from the West. The goal is not to dethrone the US, not for primacy on the seas or bullying other countries.

    • @ramiroescamilla7263
      @ramiroescamilla7263 3 місяці тому +4

      A carrier is just a seating duck for Russia’s hypersonic missels

    • @FrankiePo89
      @FrankiePo89 3 місяці тому

      Yes, China ramped up its military for its defense. Usa use its military to invade and STEAL.

    • @obviouslyme1293
      @obviouslyme1293 2 місяці тому

      They definitely built this carrier to bully us, the ASEAN countries. There are several tensions between ASEAN countries and the China currently.

    • @mattesyl33
      @mattesyl33 2 місяці тому

      🤣😂

  • @楚逸揚
    @楚逸揚 4 місяці тому +103

    There is no video of the Ford aircraft carrier catapulting the F-35C online, only the F-18 Super Hornet fighter jet can be catapulted. The inventor of the Fujian aircraft carrier electromagnetic catapult declared that China's electromagnetic catapult technology is 10 years ahead of that of the United States.

    • @benthekeeshond545
      @benthekeeshond545 4 місяці тому +6

      You are being arrogant. This is how conflicts started.

    • @zhugeliang3905
      @zhugeliang3905 3 місяці тому +16

      ​@@benthekeeshond545
      You are being too sensitive.

    • @petergohtek5842
      @petergohtek5842 3 місяці тому +8

      Keep it, up. China, you can build anything if have enough time

    • @petergohtek5842
      @petergohtek5842 3 місяці тому +6

      Two more aircraft carriers, already, started at shipyard in northern China, must be nuclear power aircraft carriers with advance than FORD

    • @zhugeliang3905
      @zhugeliang3905 3 місяці тому

      @@petergohtek5842
      Excellent development 💯

  • @charlesoh14
    @charlesoh14 4 місяці тому +86

    Why shock Russia and Iran? Trying to spoil close friendship. Wicked you

    • @atyafatima386
      @atyafatima386 4 місяці тому +17

      Good comment. This video appears to be a US Navy PR project, designed to assure the U.S Navy, and the rest of the world that America reigns supreme where aircraft carriers are concerned. China is catching up, and fast.

    • @tgerilc2200
      @tgerilc2200 3 місяці тому +5

      Yeah right..divide and rule don't work on brics..

    • @PahatRout
      @PahatRout 3 місяці тому +3

      @@atyafatima386 , They are trying to get their printing press to print more green backs!

  • @Etienne-ck3tr
    @Etienne-ck3tr 4 місяці тому +84

    The narrator says: "While the Fujian is a big step forward for China, it's still new to building such advances carriers, while the US has more experience, which is why the USS Ford is more capable than the Fujian". That's a pretty arbitrary and naive assumption, especially when you've admitted that many of the exact specs of the Fujian are still unknown. Typical American arrogance!

    • @joegenson9584
      @joegenson9584 4 місяці тому

      Sorry America is not arrogant, it's the other way around. American and Japanese had vast experienced in building and working with aircraft carriers, more than five decades, Chinese has less than 5 years and is beginning to learn how this behemoth works and it is being build. Chinese need to eat more rice and steal plans from America before they could understand and learn how to build an aircraft carriers. Being an arrogant and a show off do not bode well with Dictator Xi, he will surely fail and be embarrassed and those aircraft carriers will be made into a floating Casinos instead as it was meant to be when they boat that old and discarded Ukrainian aircraft carrier.

    • @ramiroescamilla7263
      @ramiroescamilla7263 3 місяці тому +7

      They said the same about the Abraham tank in Ukraine every one is been destroyed by Russia.

    • @patrolmanracv
      @patrolmanracv 3 місяці тому +7

      its called exceptionalism ....they think they are better than everyone else ....when in fact they are not ...

    • @KondwaniLeonard
      @KondwaniLeonard 3 місяці тому

      But America never win a war

  • @jotai99
    @jotai99 4 місяці тому +49

    America is always in shock ... unless they are the one and only one that rules the world.

    • @kwokholuk8723
      @kwokholuk8723 3 місяці тому

      Which country wants to be no. 1 for ever?

    • @kwokholuk8723
      @kwokholuk8723 3 місяці тому

      Politicians of that country still live in the 20th century.

  • @ymalik9813
    @ymalik9813 3 місяці тому +38

    How is US navy going to pay for this as the government debt is at 34 trillion dollars and bricks and others dumping the USD

    • @fooveyron3080
      @fooveyron3080 3 місяці тому +6

      Borrow from China

    • @frankcheung917
      @frankcheung917 3 місяці тому +2

      @@fooveyron3080 Lmao 🤣🤣🤣

    • @johnchow8372
      @johnchow8372 3 місяці тому +2

      Print more

    • @genX68
      @genX68 3 місяці тому +2

      How do u think we got the Debt, lol

  • @GIZMO3380
    @GIZMO3380 4 місяці тому +46

    😂😂😂
    How is it that China aircraft carrier Fujian a threat to US when US has 11 ACs. US which rule over the seas is not a threat to others?😂

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 3 місяці тому +11

      11 carrier exist on paper only. half of them are in need of service and there is no shipyard capable of maintaining them on schedule.

    • @PahatRout
      @PahatRout 2 місяці тому

      By 2040, China will also have 10 carrier groups with 4 in the Pacific ocean, 3 in Atlantic Ocean and 3 in the Indian ocean. With gained experience, she will be able to launch 1 carrier every 2 years.

    • @whispermason8052
      @whispermason8052 28 днів тому

      You don't drydock a carrier with a 25 year power plant. You people have much to learn. Especially since the Chinese catapult system still doesn't work. You don't have the capacitor technology. It's one of the many things China counted on being ready by now that you still do not understand the dynamics of. Make sure the J pilots have water wings if yhey can't swin.

  • @thomasmurray4496
    @thomasmurray4496 4 місяці тому +53

    Who has Hypersonics to take out Carriers?US don't

    • @djprentowalker8878
      @djprentowalker8878 3 місяці тому +1

      Who do not know will fine out 😂

    • @AllHandlesHaveBeenTaken
      @AllHandlesHaveBeenTaken 3 місяці тому

      Maybe you are wrong 😮

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 3 місяці тому +3

      The US definitely doesn’t, we know that much.

    • @raaab1212
      @raaab1212 2 місяці тому +1

      You don't k ow exactly what the us has. You watch to much youtube videos

    • @Gabe-bz9nk
      @Gabe-bz9nk 2 місяці тому

      The us and Japan working on electromagnetic rail gun . Missiles will be useless. Chinas carrier is a joke . Only a certain number of planes can land there . And no one else

  • @lamlawrence3539
    @lamlawrence3539 4 місяці тому +56

    Is it a threat if someone better you USA ?

    • @tkh2944
      @tkh2944 3 місяці тому

      👉The great National Insecurity !?👈

  • @มะนาว-ง2ร
    @มะนาว-ง2ร 4 місяці тому +80

    i love china i am thailand

    • @shiwei-x7t
      @shiwei-x7t 4 місяці тому +12

      中泰一家亲

    • @irritatedanglosaxon1705
      @irritatedanglosaxon1705 4 місяці тому +9

      Me too and I'm from US

    • @robertnowak8613
      @robertnowak8613 3 місяці тому +2

      You are unique in your view, other's think differently and the others are the majority....

    • @jesusvalencia3450
      @jesusvalencia3450 3 місяці тому

      @@irritatedanglosaxon1705 Move to Communist China now.

    • @jackylai5718
      @jackylai5718 3 місяці тому +5

      I love human...peace....I am from China

  • @kio5614
    @kio5614 3 місяці тому +5

    This is like a guy lives across the town, bring guns to your house, peak from the ftront and the back windows of your house to check out what you are doing inside. When he see you are sharpening your kitchen knife, he call the police that you are threatening him and your nightbours. Isn't that funny? Is this western logic?

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 4 місяці тому +18

    I like it they are powerful and intelligent 😅

  • @glenchua3315
    @glenchua3315 2 місяці тому +11

    Correction . China has never threatened any country in the world. The USA just cannot get used to be number 2 world economy.

    • @chaoskid1211
      @chaoskid1211 Місяць тому

      😂. 13 billion dollar investment. Say it in rmb.😂

  • @DrTariqshabbirkhanBarbara
    @DrTariqshabbirkhanBarbara 4 місяці тому +17

    China is a great nation confus great history and our time tested friend

  • @QaibzooNtaustsisxaiv
    @QaibzooNtaustsisxaiv 4 місяці тому +16

    You better scares of Chima because you put yourself as enemies of the world

    • @petergohtek5842
      @petergohtek5842 4 місяці тому

      Only hypocrite will be an enemy of China development

  • @BobMarley-fo6cz
    @BobMarley-fo6cz 4 місяці тому +12

    ❤ China

  • @VittonLou
    @VittonLou 3 місяці тому +6

    Until it gets tested in War, we'll never know it's real capability. It might have the same fate as the battleship Yamato

  • @HappyPandaBear73
    @HappyPandaBear73 4 місяці тому +41

    AWESOME! GO CHINA!👍🙂

  • @cheeshenglim9949
    @cheeshenglim9949 3 місяці тому +15

    Not sure whether America got the money power to sustain it's military power. No money, no army.

    • @robertnowak8613
      @robertnowak8613 3 місяці тому +4

      Yeah, cause China doesn't have debt -😅- and is total harmony 😅

    • @choyboonsian9060
      @choyboonsian9060 3 місяці тому +2

      America very good in printing money!!😂😂😂

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 3 місяці тому

      @@robertnowak8613
      Yeah but the US is broke and countries around the world are deciding that they don’t need to do business with the warmongering US anymore.

  • @Xyp122
    @Xyp122 4 місяці тому +31

    What is the point of having an air craft carrier that is bigger n more powerful but your catapult system is not working well.
    Always need maintaining.
    China's system is more advance because it uses DC drive.

    • @JoePakoa
      @JoePakoa 3 місяці тому

      Why not using them now,,,??

  • @frankojudoka
    @frankojudoka 4 місяці тому +9

    I saw a video about Australia sold HMAS Melbourne to China but forgot to dismantle its catapult system. 😅

    • @johnseah5678
      @johnseah5678 4 місяці тому +5

      Wasn't it the arrestor gear system that the Aussies forgot to dismantle and not the catapult system?

    • @HTeo-og1lg
      @HTeo-og1lg 2 місяці тому +1

      No, we forgot to take the koala bear out from one of the sailor's bunker.

  • @davidluu3108
    @davidluu3108 4 місяці тому +12

    I love you m'y nations China ❤️

  • @do_duc8799
    @do_duc8799 4 місяці тому +8

    Drones will make ships obsolete. Imagine sending 10 million lethal drones at the ships. How do you stop that..

    • @ZainurZakaria-v2f
      @ZainurZakaria-v2f 2 місяці тому

      10 million lethal drones. Are you dreaming.

    • @mrpj1390
      @mrpj1390 2 місяці тому

      Plus drones have limited range. That's not gonna be much of a threat to any of America's carriers. China still has a ways to go before they can catch us.

  • @АндрейМ-ф5н
    @АндрейМ-ф5н 4 місяці тому +21

    ВМФ НОАК 🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍🇨🇳👍

  • @lamlawrence3539
    @lamlawrence3539 4 місяці тому +15

    big carrier is a sitting duck in modern warfare, it does not need a carrier to fight a carrier

  • @ericchang-ek2ee
    @ericchang-ek2ee 4 місяці тому +23

    中美距離十萬八千里,
    汪洋大海狂風乘巨浪,
    和平共存友好又雙贏,
    驅驅一條福建小航母,
    請不用擔心了!

    • @kwokholuk8723
      @kwokholuk8723 3 місяці тому +6

      Which country wants to be no. 1 forever? Which country like to demonize and oppress the no. 2 country?

    • @henryyuen6575
      @henryyuen6575 3 місяці тому +5

      中美距離十萬八千里,
      汪洋大海乘風又破浪。
      和平共存本是雙贏好,
      祇是美帝單邊好獨尊。
      驅驅福建足讓美霸憂,
      從此不可欺我大中華。

  • @ronmorris1151
    @ronmorris1151 4 місяці тому +4

    The Droneage will eventually make the carrier obsolete just as thewarplane made the battleship obsolete

  • @napoleonberdos2088
    @napoleonberdos2088 3 місяці тому +8

    To much talking if they wants war they should go to war but they don't have bolls

  • @mattesyl33
    @mattesyl33 2 місяці тому +1

    These kind of "secrets" only surprise everyday citizens. I guarantee that the US military knows exactly wtf is up, and was not caught "off guard." The carrier means nearly nothing on it's own. This is why every US carrier goes nowhere without a fleet of other ships. It's support system allows the US to move these fleets, each being equivalent to a city worth of military supremacy, within reach of supporting, defending, or attacking every country on the planet. One newish Chinese aircraft carrier doesn't even come close to tipping the scales. This is like claiming the CCP also has the largest navy....because they use civilian fishing boats and other privately-owned civilian vessels as militia.

  • @TheFirefox8192
    @TheFirefox8192 4 місяці тому +13

    Go Dragon Go

  • @JordanRiver-v8c
    @JordanRiver-v8c 4 місяці тому +4

    China has to improve more … nuclear aircraft carrier

  • @johnchow8372
    @johnchow8372 3 місяці тому +2

    Like David and Goliah, Goliah is too big to miss.

  • @phongy45
    @phongy45 4 місяці тому +7

    awesome ,,, good job

  • @YuChiu-g9m
    @YuChiu-g9m 3 місяці тому +2

    Why are you worry US have 11 and China only have 3😅

  • @MDruheITaIukdar
    @MDruheITaIukdar 4 місяці тому +7

    🇧🇩🤝🏻🇨🇳

  • @lamlawrence3539
    @lamlawrence3539 4 місяці тому +4

    can the nuclear power carrier run faster than a supersonic missile ?

  • @saysumesh
    @saysumesh 4 місяці тому +10

    He supposed to say india..but he is saying Iran 😂😂😂

    • @sungwong517
      @sungwong517 4 місяці тому +3

      😂😂😂

    • @TheMikePho
      @TheMikePho 3 місяці тому

      He's just reading a script for his Chinese employer. He doesn't know anything.

  • @sco2735
    @sco2735 3 місяці тому +1

    The Chinese carriers are conventional fueled ships, meaning the Chinese navy is not a "blue water."

  • @rairam6428
    @rairam6428 3 місяці тому +2

    HOW CAN IT BE SECRET
    100 OOO TONS FLOODING ON THE SEA

  • @vengeance5020
    @vengeance5020 28 днів тому

    Are you kidding me Fujian is a nothing but wanna be USS Gerald R. Ford 😂😂😂

  • @nicolema2404
    @nicolema2404 4 місяці тому +5

    AWESOME 👍👍

  • @timwaelti6973
    @timwaelti6973 Місяць тому

    Can you say SR-72 coming from space to attack with invisible skins.😂😂😂😂

  • @NikoeEng
    @NikoeEng 22 дні тому

    Ya. But they built to defense not to offense.

  • @RATCLIFFE-LISTENS
    @RATCLIFFE-LISTENS 14 днів тому

    NOTICE HOW MUCH TROUBLE WE’VE EXPERIENCED WITH THE FORD. WHY ARE WE BUILDING WORTHY RIVALS? WHY NOT THINKING MILES OUT OF THE BOX. THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING THE CHINESE WILL NEVER STOP AND WILL NEVER STOP SPENDING. WE NEED MANY MORE SHIPS BUT ARE LIMITED BY LACK OF SKILLED SHIPBUILDERS AND ENGINEERS AND SHIPYARDS. WE SHOULD BE PAYING FOR THE EDUCATION OF ENGINEERS. ITS NOW SHOWTIME FOLKS.

  • @djalelsmara1150
    @djalelsmara1150 Місяць тому

    How Building an aircraft carrier would be a threat ?!

  • @ThePonderingPiper
    @ThePonderingPiper 4 місяці тому +4

    These carriers are like the dinosaurs, a dying species. They’re easy targets in this time and age…

  • @youngstunna1594
    @youngstunna1594 4 місяці тому +1

    “The United States most powerful cargo ship”???😮😮 how dare you!!

  • @spamfreeliu7704
    @spamfreeliu7704 2 місяці тому

    When you can't decisively beat the others, it's a threat!!! Aren't you the threat to the other in the first place? 🙂

  • @feihongwong2524
    @feihongwong2524 4 місяці тому +29

    this guy tried to sell us story, but the reality The F35 crashed most of the time 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @JoePakoa
    @JoePakoa 3 місяці тому +1

    United nations means the whole world,, doesn't mean two or three nations,,I love US,,

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 3 місяці тому

      There are plenty of countries that disregard the UN and want nothing to do with it.

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 3 місяці тому

      No it doesn’t.
      No one cares about the UN anymore…..except you.

  • @jeanschaeffer4225
    @jeanschaeffer4225 2 місяці тому

    ......
    YES..YES...
    BUT...AIRCRAFT ...CARRIERS ARE ...EASY ...TO
    SINK ...
    WITH TODAY...MISSILE TECHNOLOGY......
    THIS
    IS ....WAST OF MONEY...
    ..
    ....JUST ..LIKE THE USA...JUST GOOD FOR A
    PARADE....
    OR
    FOR HOLLYWOOD....
    GREETINGS FROM ASIA..

  • @BUSSINESSMAN-sb6xb
    @BUSSINESSMAN-sb6xb 3 місяці тому +1

    Great Country by Brilliant People ❤

  • @suwarto3548
    @suwarto3548 4 місяці тому +1

    China kalau tidak bisa damai dengan Amerika pasti dihabisi Amerika.

  • @wparlin
    @wparlin 2 місяці тому +1

    Chinese already ahead in space station more advance. And ahead to the moon. And soon mars. So USA just can not accept that. 😂😂 mentality like Britain when they were overtaken by USA. History repeat itself.

  • @leesengchoylee7228
    @leesengchoylee7228 4 місяці тому +3

    China must build stronger in high technology engineering field weapons on Aircraft carrier around 10 nos and another Warship with Big Gun can fire around 2300 /3000km together with anti missile rocker for fire on submarine in 3500 dept Sea levels and Air to Air anti missile gun fire around 25000/40000 ceiling level .

  • @sm00v00
    @sm00v00 3 місяці тому +1

    Fujian serve Dim Sum US serve bacon & eggs😆

  • @timwaelti6973
    @timwaelti6973 Місяць тому

    Lol China warships will be a target rich environment.

  • @raaab1212
    @raaab1212 2 місяці тому

    Definitely not a threat!😂😂😂😂😂

  • @thomasferrari6465
    @thomasferrari6465 4 місяці тому +6

    I'm hoping that they don't decommission. These old aircraft carriers too soon. They can be turned into drone carriers and still help out the Fleet. Because it costs a lot of money to build these things and it takes a long time to get one and right now. The Chinese are out building. And I think you could probably get another 15 years usage out of this granite.It's old but still has a use for a few years more

    • @TheMikePho
      @TheMikePho 3 місяці тому

      Yeah, and it needs a tow-boat to tug it around.

  • @nikolayjerev6138
    @nikolayjerev6138 2 місяці тому

    Allies? More like vassals

  • @manolitogarcia103
    @manolitogarcia103 2 місяці тому

    USA STILL HAS THE ADVANCED AIRCRAFT CARRIERS! MOST SOPHISTICATED US AIRCRFT CARRIERS AND MUCH TESTED IN COMBAT EVEN DURING WW 2! STILL USA IS NOS. 1

  • @user-helphand02
    @user-helphand02 2 місяці тому

    United States should build a aircraft and will be best ever made on Forest are and underwater 💥💯🦅

  • @fckhaw1189
    @fckhaw1189 4 місяці тому +7

    Fujian is using a hybrid engine with traditional and nuclear capabilities. It can travel at 55 knots per hour.

  • @ahveetsoor
    @ahveetsoor 3 місяці тому +1

    Stop saying secret. It's on the net.

  • @weiminglu5331
    @weiminglu5331 2 місяці тому

    China's Type 003 aircraft carrier will be much cheaper than the US Ford class' $13 Billion, per huge different cost structure between the two countries.

  • @ankursahu269
    @ankursahu269 28 днів тому

    Trillion investment of your this technology advancement

  • @HBCOU
    @HBCOU 4 місяці тому +1

    No mention of Daniel Duggan? 🤔

  • @AllHandlesHaveBeenTaken
    @AllHandlesHaveBeenTaken 3 місяці тому +1

    An aircraft that launches crappy planes

  • @doloresfranciscobrigola3037
    @doloresfranciscobrigola3037 3 місяці тому +1

    Ur economy is doun people need food not carrier

  • @pouwakaruwhiu8349
    @pouwakaruwhiu8349 4 місяці тому +3

    It's hard to compare which Aircraft carrier is the best on the battlefield, if America goes to war with China then we will know who's got the best weapon, from Australia 🦘

    • @samyliu
      @samyliu 4 місяці тому +3

      I remember in the Korean war 1950-1952, the US army had the best weapons on earth. Then what...

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 3 місяці тому

      Is that right Sherlock?

    • @danh_dang7912
      @danh_dang7912 2 місяці тому +1

      2 nuclear weapons nations at war ? No no no mate !

  • @larrybanta8858
    @larrybanta8858 4 місяці тому +1

    Wow that's crazy and scary

  • @GemBeLL997
    @GemBeLL997 3 місяці тому

    Menerjemahkan teks dengan kamera
    China is strengthening its military just for defense and distraction from America

  • @johnherr6062
    @johnherr6062 4 місяці тому +3

    This is nothing sounds like it has boilers or gas turbines, it will have to be refueled about every three or four days.

  • @chrischen1056
    @chrischen1056 4 місяці тому +3

    KJ-600 is two-generations ahead of E-2D

  • @nsr500
    @nsr500 2 місяці тому

    made in china quality as well.....

  • @PahatRout
    @PahatRout 3 місяці тому

    Why is China costing it in US $? It is more likely to be in RMB!

  • @johnnylo5072
    @johnnylo5072 3 місяці тому

    13 billion is RMB, not dollar

  • @markharkey2480
    @markharkey2480 Місяць тому

    Non since

  • @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd
    @MarkLandrebe-ef5yd 3 місяці тому

    $13 Billion for a smaller / non-nuclear aircraft carrier (??)

    • @mynameisnobody211
      @mynameisnobody211 3 місяці тому +1

      13 billion RMB not $, so only about $5 billion for the boat compared to $13 billion for the USA boat.
      Got to love that corruption in the USA MIC.
      The bloke in the vids got it wrong.

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 3 місяці тому

    Resembles Japanese aircraft carrier flattops,hahaha

  • @djprentowalker8878
    @djprentowalker8878 3 місяці тому

    Those ship will never build the Ford is the last ship build

  • @allanbengtsen7991
    @allanbengtsen7991 3 місяці тому +1

    China came crying to rosevelt and this is the thanks boycot china

  • @chen-beixuan
    @chen-beixuan 4 місяці тому +4

    Still no nuclear powered aircraft carrier? 🤣 The world is NOT worried.

    • @samyliu
      @samyliu 4 місяці тому +9

      You might not know the meaning of nuclear powered vessels. In combat situation, nuclear power is helpless.

    • @chen-beixuan
      @chen-beixuan 4 місяці тому

      @@samyliu 13 kilometer range vs unlimited range. heLPleSS iN ComBAt SiTuatION. What do you do when you run out of fuel? 🤪 Guess what doesn't have that problem though?

    • @ftd7435
      @ftd7435 3 місяці тому +4

      @@chen-beixuan Pentagon's General Austin has openly admitted US has NO DEFENSE against China's hypersonic missiles ( which was revealed by General Miller in 2022 ). So what if you have unlimited range? Chinese hypersonic missiles can still sink US carriers.

    • @gracewu4345
      @gracewu4345 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@samyliu Nuclear power is good for lasting power only, when battle only the fighter jets and missiles (weapons) count.

    • @samyliu
      @samyliu 3 місяці тому +3

      @@chen-beixuan do you mean you need to ensure you have sufficient fuel to runaway? Yes, nuclear powered vessels have absolute advantage in navigation but not in combat

  • @halftuber1003
    @halftuber1003 3 місяці тому

    CONGRATULATIONS

  • @rajlowkie6616
    @rajlowkie6616 3 місяці тому

    The Story just seems ODD, because the 🇨🇳 'sCCP threatened the 🇺🇸 navy with missiles, forget about it 🎯 its targeted 🎯 .

  • @lateef_Poet_Philosopher_Verily
    @lateef_Poet_Philosopher_Verily 3 місяці тому

    Aww! Hats Off To China Formidably! Ye Gospel Truth

  • @Sonja00
    @Sonja00 14 днів тому

    The world will self desruct in year 2025 February 3rd

  • @MarkHenry-nx7ir
    @MarkHenry-nx7ir 3 місяці тому

    Someone please answer me this if China 🇨🇳 came in from the front right now because Russia is in Cuba and China stuck it on the USA 🇺🇸 right now what would really happen? Please can someone answer that for me please

  • @VictorThang-b5p
    @VictorThang-b5p 3 місяці тому

    Unbeatable beast❤

  • @teonorman1892
    @teonorman1892 4 місяці тому +4

    Built for target practice.

  • @greggpennington966
    @greggpennington966 3 місяці тому

    Seriously ? 😮

  • @WillPenn7555
    @WillPenn7555 4 місяці тому +1

    Please

  • @aljusiakmujang2086
    @aljusiakmujang2086 4 місяці тому +1

    Just like to compare Iphone vs China smartphone ..which one is the best ,,..

    • @leondee918
      @leondee918 4 місяці тому +2

      ...and where is the iPhone produced? Ironic, no?

    • @aljusiakmujang2086
      @aljusiakmujang2086 4 місяці тому

      @@leondee918 before produck in China and also China tech phone compare to iphone now

  • @timfronimos459
    @timfronimos459 2 місяці тому

    Horrible editing on this video. USS Gerald... really. How much of the video is wrong.

  • @neilbertescalante697
    @neilbertescalante697 4 місяці тому +4

    😂😂😂😂 US shock china TuFo air Craft carrier😂😂

    • @hongqi5734
      @hongqi5734 3 місяці тому

      India can't even dream of building one. 😂😂

    • @TheMikePho
      @TheMikePho 3 місяці тому

      ​@@hongqi5734 India has no need to bluff anybody. Wonton Mein you.

  • @51654m
    @51654m 4 місяці тому +3

    What a joke...

  • @paulinearcega2062
    @paulinearcega2062 4 місяці тому +4

    Cheaper metal,no experienced,only movies action

  • @michaelamericanspas7549
    @michaelamericanspas7549 3 місяці тому +1

    Full of shits, it is 13 billion RMB

  • @phongy45
    @phongy45 4 місяці тому +1

    lol ... west always .. create ... stress ... lol

  • @SSpharmacy-u4t
    @SSpharmacy-u4t 3 місяці тому

    the diff with US and China Sub is that is.. ChinaSub ios so cecret.. I know nothing I hear BNothing and the US is I know a lot ??? :)