Scientists Reveal Surprising Genetic Origins of The Korean People
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- The evolutionary history of East Asian populations has always intrigued scientists.Research shows a clear genetic difference between the southern and northern populations of East Asia, likely stemming from the region's early settlement patterns.There are two main theories about how people first migrated into East Asia.The first theory suggests that early settlers came from Southeast Asia and moved northward, supported by recent genetic studies.The second theory proposes a more complex migration, with groups moving through both Central Asia and Southeast Asia.
Link to research
journals.plos....
Judging by appearance alone, Northeast Asians are similar. However, when meeting people from each country, there is a sense of heterogeneity. The exception is Mongolians. Mongolians look and feel very similar to Koreans. Also, their Korean pronunciation is very accurate. I have met Mongolians in Korea a few times. I thought they were Korean until they told me they were Mongolians.
you make an excellent point here ...
I agree .
Some but ethnically Mongolians are not that close to us. Closest one is Japanese, Manchurians
Lol you wish. Mongolians look totally different with big round faces and short stocky bodies and they are born with blond hair and blue/green eyes. That never happens with Koreans.
제주도는 그들의 할아버지들이 몽골인이었다고 함 제주도 사투리가 몽골말이 많이 섞여있어서 낯선거임
몽골인들이 원나라때 제주도를 너무 좋아했다는 말키우기 좋지 거기다 바다가 없던 몽골인들한테 너무 좋아했다는
@evoinception Thank you so much for this video!!! Coming from a Korean, that has also extensively studied Korean & East Asian history, and had a looooong time interest in genetic research, I really appreciate the work you put into this, and the information presented!!! 👏👏👏
It's just so ridiculous to me, the flat out false misinformation that is spread nowadays by people that have absolutely ZERO knowledge about a subject, yet people for some reason start believing that nonsense because of a 30 second TikTok video!!! 🙄🤦♀️
Thank you for your hard work, and your help in actually putting out good educational content!!! 🤗
❤️🇰🇷❤️
thanks for your kind words, means a lot ...
@@evoinception You are very welcome!!! 🤗 I'll be rooting for you & much success for your future!!! 👍😉👍
@@Sugas_Girr what tik tok video are you referring to?
Korea made the history of the ancient Chinese in Chaoxian 朝鮮 (Today Korea territory) into a historical TV series.specially used to create fake history (and culture) and brainwashing humans.
South Korean historical dramas copy Chinese historical dramas by wearing clothes and headdresses that never appeared in Korea history. Many years ago, your Korean drama crew started to go to China to buy props that the Chinese crew did not want and shoot TV series in Chinese city Hengdian. Now there are even cultural relics of China's Han Dynasty in the Korean TV series. Koreans even copied the whole Hengdian, but Hengdian is all Chinese style architecture . Nnot only copy Chinese architecture, but also copy Chinese interior decoration.
Chinese elements always appear in Korean TV dramas, such as ancient paintings, food, clothing, especially traditional clothes. Korean people often pretend to be the clothes and hairstyles of ancient Chinese people. Incorporate a lot of Chinese elements into TV dramas and claim that they are Korean. Koreans always give them barren history brXXXt enhancement, just as Koreans are good at plastic surgery.
@@Sugas_GirrEvo has put in lot of work, but to be more accurate his genetic study needs to be compared with written histories, cultural histories, oral histories, earth science and archeological records.
For an example, Evo mentions Han people contributed to Korean genes and tells how rice farming migrated to Korea from Han Chinese in Yellow river.
Earliest short grain rice found in Korea was carbon dated and verified by US university to 9,000-12,000 years ago. Han dynasty was founded 2,200 years ago. Where did Koreans come from prior to Han dynasty? Earliest Chinese rice found was from Yangtze River 8,000 years ago verified by Chinese. Han people didn’t occupy this area until Sui dynasty which was founded by Eastern people group not Han people group. India has long grain rice dating 10,000-14,000 years ago.
Chinese historians from 3,000 years ago called Koreans Dongyi. Dongyi were people who lived in present day Eastern Coast to Korean Peninsula. 10,000-14,000 years ago, Yellow Sea was mostly dry and was thought to be where human migrated from Africa to Eastern Asia and settled. HuaXia people whom were original tribe that founded Xia kingdom were from Xian area. Shang kingdom was Dongyi kingdom who ruled Shandong area and was migrated from Manchuria. There is a Chinese record that mentions Josun King when Xia was found. There is also Korean records of kingdoms prior to Josun (GoJosun) called Gojuk Kingdom and even earlier Baedal kingdom.
Another thing about DNA studies. It doesn’t tell you how two people groups merged. Was it an invasion by male dominated group and women were raped or taken as slaves, or was it a sons of farming group who defeated hunter-gatherer groups thus expanding mitochondrial gene pool. One example is, if a tiny group of warrior clan like Genghis Khan in 15th century wipes out China, Russia, Middle East and Eastern Europe then does DNA show Genghis Khan was absorbed by occupied people group or does it show Genghis Khan ruled all these regions? China believes Mongol occupation was still Chinese dynasty namely Yuan dynasty.
I ALWAYS felt that Koreans, Siberians, and Mongolians looked very much alike. Like from the same gene pool.
You're absolutely right that Koreans, Siberians, and Mongolians share some physical similarities, and this is supported by genetic studies. These groups all belong to the broader Northeast Asian population, which has shared genetic ancestry due to ancient migrations and interactions across the region.
@@szszszsz95395 👍
Absolutely Correct !👍👍👍
TUNGUSIC cmon now that’s common knowledge.
Greetings from Mongolia. First of all, let's emphasize that Mongols and Koreans have a very old friendly relationship. May our relationship continue to be good. Mongols and we learn Korean very easily and we have similar some words. It is said that the Huns, the ancestors of Mongolian, were divided into many groups, and one of them migrated to Korea and formed the Kim clan there. Please share the truth.
Greetings, while there are some historical and linguistic connections between Mongols, Huns, and Koreans, the idea that the Kim clan in Korea directly descends from the Xiongnu is more speculative than proven fact.
Kim is from huns according to the burial stone of ancients king of Shilla. Shilla started from the current Shanghai area and later unified three major countries where dominated the northern area of current China region including Beijing at that time which is Koguryeo(Kori), Baekjae, and Shilla. This became unified Shilla and thrived for a thousand year and Shilla later became Koryeo(Kori). Koryeo area was the biggest kingdom at that time which includes Beijing Shanghai area in current China, Manchuria, and the current Korean peninsula. After 30 years of war between Korea and Mongola, Koryeo was defeated and Mongolia and Koryeo became a brotherhood country and Mongolian king married Koryeo princess, and maintained good relationship. During the Mongolian domination of the current northeast China area Koryeo lost the domination to that area and at the very last of Koryeo kingdom, General Lee Sungkye betrayed Koryeo and became the first king of Chosun. And most of the current north eastern area of current China was taken over by Ming dynasty, which emerged from the chaos Era of the last Mongolian domination. Later on, the Ming was conquered by Qing which is descendant of Shilla, and Qing made the majority of current China territory. During the Qing dynasty, most of current Chinese people were slave of very few noble manchurian people, and CCP was emerged from the slaves and overturned the Qing dynasty. Therefore, the current China territory is not established by Chinese people but rather they stole and trying to obliterate the historical fact and rig the history. CCP realized this historical fact and admitted that the north eastern area was a part of Korean history when they just enlightened from slavery status during Japanese domination. However, later on they decided to rig the history and burned down the majority of artifact and historical remains by means of the cultural revolution. Even though CCP is willfully undergoing the rigging of historical factors, there are still numerous evidences are still existing but CCP will keep rigging the history. North East region of China, Manchuria was historically not the current Chinese.
Hello from Korea. We love Mongolians. In Korea, there are a lot of people thinking that we Koreans and Mongolians are pretty look alike in facial features more than other asians like Chinese, Japanese. You can see the actual people's reaction in the video of the Korean youtuber travel vlogs to Mongolia. I think it's really true that we share the same ancestors a long time ago.
We feel close to you guys more than other asians when it comes to looks. 🇰🇷💛🇲🇳
Kims come from Central Asia
Altaic mountains which means Gold.
Park Choi and Jung were the founders of Shila who made Kim the king.
Parks are from where Tatars were
Chois were Beijing was
Jungs where from Henan or Shandong.
and these three were probably Shamans as their Characters have close relationship with Shamanism.
and Jinhan was there initially and North East of that was Mahan which later becomes Goguryuh.
It is said that people of Jinhan were from Jin Dynasty and Mahan gave them part of South West lands to settle.
and in 7th Century when Shila conquers Baekjae and Goguyuh they state that they are decedents of dolgal whom are decedents of Turks.
Turks did not look like current Turks and it is stated in ancient Islamic texts that Turks originally looked like Mongolians
and as they move west over 600 years they changed ethnicity currently Turkmanistan is actually more Turk than Turkey.
oh and this is not revealed because there is active movement to change all ethnicity of ruler in Middle east.
Before Jingis Khan went west, west was already ruled by Turks for 500-600 years.
and when Jingis Khan left those areas started erasing history about Orientals.
You can see many statues and paintings of rulers from 700 ce to 1400 that they were all East Asians.
and in 1800s there were work done to repaint and recreate paintings and statues to make them look like middle east people.
You can go as far west as Egypt and see their older statues and paintings of the ruler (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamluk_Sultanate)
Choi here, I took genetic test and looked at my families results and can confirm we have Mongolian blood 5-10% lol
I heard from my parents that the beginning of Korean history started in Siberia and Manchuria. Now I know that was a pretty credible remark!
It's great that your parents shared that perspective with you, and there's actually truth to it. The early history of Koreans does have connections to regions like Manchuria and parts of what is now Siberia. Ancient Korean kingdoms, particularly Goguryeo, had territories that extended into Manchuria, and there were certainly interactions and migrations between these areas and the Korean Peninsula over thousands of years.
No wonder Koreans have very similar physical attributes to many modern day Siberians/Mongolians/Manchurians! Shows how complex historical interactions and dynamics were between ancient Khitans, Jurchens, Mongols & Koreans! Keep up the great videos :)
thanks for your kind words and support ...
Very interesting video, I noticed some of old pictures the people were very dark skinned. Did African people migrate to Asia.
@@rennie2611 While it's true that some old pictures might show people with darker skin tones, this doesn't necessarily indicate African ancestry. The variation in skin tones among Koreans, like in many populations, can be attributed to a range of factors, including genetics, exposure to the sun, and even historical environmental conditions.Regarding migration, there is no substantial evidence that African people directly migrated to Korea in ancient times.
@@evoinceptionLies there is proof just like China has African dynasties
No wonder they were strong enough to defend against the ancinet China and Manchuria for 5000 years except few defeats!!
Even if You lived in Japan for a long time, he would not know that the first emperor of Japan was a descendant of the royal family of Baekje, one of the countries on the Korean Peninsula, because it is taboo in Japan. As someone who studies East Asian history, I would like to briefly explain the relationship between Japan and Korea. Japan was a blessed island nation that accepted many cultures from China (mainly the Tang Dynasty) and the Korean Peninsula (mainly Baekje and Gaya) and was not invaded by continental powers.Even the only Mongol invasion failed by storm ("kamikaze" as the Japanese call it).Historically, Korea people fought many great wars in which hundreds of thousands or millions of troops invaded, but the targets were northern people groups such as the Sui, Tang, Khitan, Qing, and Mongols, and were generally friendly to the Chinese dynasties of Song and Ming etc... Japan's a bit more complicated, although there have been hundreds of small raids along the eastern seaboard by Japanese pirates called Waku. Afterwards, there was a great invasion by Yamato's toyotomi unified shogunate with hundreds of thousands of regular troops, and the background to the Seven Years' War, which was called the Yamato rebellion, was that the carelessness and arrogance of Joseon (Korea), which enjoyed only peace and culture for 200 years, treated Yamato (Japan) as a barbaric pirate group rather than a country. However, Yamato had a high level of tactics through clan battles for 100 years, and the 170,000 troops of Toyotomi, who unified the whole country, armed with Portuguese matchlocks and attacked Joseon. Historically, Japan has waged a surprise war without a declaration of war.The 16,000 Elite heavy cavalry that Joseon was proud of, which had suppressed the cruel northern peoples, was defeated by the Yamato Matchlock unit, and 70, 000 Joseon Army was pushed back all the way to Pyongyang. Yamato, which was a medieval feudal lord era, gained land and people if it won a war, but in Joseon, which was a centralized country, the king fled to the north, but the people and monks formed a militia and fought to the end , the Japanese army was embarrassed by the existence of the Militia.Admiral Yi Sun-sin of Joseon defeated the Japanese navy by winning all 33 naval battles despite overwhelming odds.
The basic weapons of the Joseon army were bows, spears, and swords, as well as gunpowder bombs and various cannons of different sizes..The Ming Dynasty (China) sent reinforcements to help Joseon, but instead harassed Joseon by plundering and engaging in internal communication with Japan, but helped Yi Sun sin in the final naval battle.Yamato, who did not have the technology to make pottery, Taken in hundreds of Joseon pottery craftsmen to make pottery and exported the pottery to Europe, where it received favorable reviews. Joseon was unable to recover from the aftereffects of this war for 400 years and suffered the humiliation of being annexed by Japan, which it regarded as an uncivilized island, and being ruled for 35 years. This Great War was a symbolic event in which the international status of the Korean Peninsula with 4,800 years of history was reversed by the Japanese archipelago with 1,800 years of history. 300 years later, Joseon became a reclusive country with a policy of isolation, and Japan defeated the Russian fleet through the strategy of Yi Sun-sin, the great naval admiral of the country it invaded 400 years ago, and later joined the ranks of the great powers. Yi Sun sin's the world's top 3 naval admiral and the turtle ship is an invincible Korean Item in the Age of Empires PC Games.
hahaha ... kokuryeo and paekche were ancient kingdoms that had existed on the
korean peninsula, for sure.
however, they cannot necessarily be said to belong to korean history based on their
ethnic lineage.
in kokuryeo, both the royal family and the ppl were "tungusic manchurians",
while in paekche, only the founders of the royal family were tungusic manchurians
but most of its ppl were indigenous inhabitants.
paekche occupied the southwestern part of the korean peninsula, and its ruling
class is generally thought to be the buyeo/puyo ppl, who originated from the
tungusic manchurians, similar to the kokuryeo royal family in the north.
'the book of sui: paekche biography 隋书 百济伝' says that "ancestors of paekche
ppl were descended from kokuryeo ppl.
paekche is a ethnically mixed region, where there are various ppls from shilla,
kokuryeo, wa (ancient japan), and chinese ppl as well."
(百濟之先, 出自高麗國. 其人雜有新羅, 高麗, 倭等, 亦有中國人.)
anyway, "the direct ancestors" of the present-day koreans are ppl of unified shilla,
not kokuryeo and paekche.
kokuryeo ppl moved to the chinese mainland, and became chinese.
similarly, paekche ppl fled to the japanese archipelago, and became japanese.
While there are theories suggesting that some members of the Baekje royal family may have fled to Japan, there is no solid evidence that the Japanese imperial family is directly descended from Baekje royalty. This idea remains speculative and is not widely accepted by historians.
그거야.
그리고 무엇보다 한국은 백제 왕실의 정통을 계승하는 국가가 아니다. 마치 현재 스페인 왕가는 부르봉 왕가 혈통이니 스페인 왕족들은 프랑스인이라고 주장하는 것과 하등 다를 바 없다.
@@evoinception In 2001, Emperor Akihito told reporters "I, on my part, feel a certain kinship with Korea, given the fact that it is recorded in the Chronicles of Japan that the mother of Emperor Kammu [Niigasa] was one of the descendant of King Muryong of Baekje." Is the Chronicles of Japan not a reliable source?
@@evoinception ua-cam.com/video/rTWxGtI-b6g/v-deo.htmlsi=uhzu-jL7ZDfW-vd0 0:34
As the emperor Akihito has already declared at 0:34 in this linked video, isn’t it clear that Japanese emperor family are the descendants(or at least the relative) of Baekje royal family? It’s already documented on Shoukunihonshoki(Chronicles of Japan).
The interesting is that the Korean language is an isolated language unrelated to any particular family. Although linguists have attempted to group it with the now debunked Altaic family, they recognized many of the similarities are based on areal features that is from outside influence rather than genetic origin.
For instance, Korean, while having some typological features in common with Altaic languages (such as agglutination and subject-object-verb (SOV) word order), also has significant differences. The differences in syntax, morphology, and phonology make it challenging to place Korean within the Altaic family without more compelling evidence.
I believe it's a Siberian Altaic hybrid. Like it's been said it has common with Nivkh
@@Keeko.8 thats what I hear too. In fact, the Nivkhs are supposedly the group that Koreans are most closely related to.
Altaic is a widely debunked language family by a academia worldwide....
@@Keeko.8not surprising as nivks are a tungustic people....a look at Korean kingdoms like buyeo,balhae,gogoryeo etc etc tungustic tribes played a very important role within the kingdom and were recorded as the tungustic mohe(Malgal) tribe by Chinese.
Malgal tribe later became the Jurchens.
You make a great point. I agree that while Korean shares some features with Altaic languages, like agglutination and SOV word order, the significant differences in syntax, morphology, and phonology indicate it's an isolated language. The similarities are likely due to cultural and linguistic exchanges rather than a shared origin. Thanks for bringing this up...
As a Korean American, I found this video to be quite interesting and informative. Quite ironic how genetically similar Koreans and Japanese are. It’s like sibling rivalry in a way. Personally, I don’t have anything against Japanese people as a whole. On the other hand, my mother, who grew up after the Korean War, doesn’t really trust the Japanese. Clearly, our different views are mostly due to where and when we were brought up.
Korea was under occupation by the Imperial Japan since 1910 to 1945. The Korean War is the civil war from the 50s, in the context of the Cold War (USA- Soviet Union), that led to the actual division North-South.
영상이 흥미롭고 유익하다고 느껴주셔서 감사합니다.
@@lupimali9504 The Japanese didn't free anybody. The slaves were set free by law in 1894, not 1910. The class based discrimination lingered throughout Japanese occupation, and only disappeared after the Korean War. LOL at your lack of education.
@@shindavid6484
국민 10명중 8명이 노예였던 쓰레기 국가 ...
짐승처럼 울부짓고 살던 야만인 죠센징들 한테.
학교 지어주고 교육도 무료로 시켜줌.
직업도 만들어줌.
한글 장려 시키고.
노예제 폐지시키고 차별 금지시킴.
조선왕조는 역사상 가장 부패된 나라였음 왕권 양반 관료들의 부패로 모든 국민을 노예로 삼아 국민들이 고통을 받던 시대임 오죽하면 아직도 양반출신이란 성씨로 아직도 허세를 부리고 노예출신을 비웃것누.
조선인은 은혜를 원수로 갚는 종족이다.
@@user-so4sc8ge8x I only know one form of occupatiion and is by force, otherwise would be an invitation to become a protectorate.
Koreans' direct ancestor was the race 'Yemack' originated from Northeast Asia for a long time ago. Historically, the race was divided into many diverse Asian tribes such as Korean, Mongolian, and Manchurian, as time went by, so those three races have a similar lingual structure for each other, according to the related linguistic theories. Their languages are members of the Altai lingual group.
Recent linguistic and genetic studies show that while there are some similarities, these groups have distinct languages and genetic markers. The classification of Korean as part of the Altaic language family is also controversial and not widely accepted in modern linguistics.
@@evoinception Altaic is probably a _sprachbund_ and not an actual language family.
thats true.
and goguryeo was founded by gao jumong 高朱蒙 from puyo/buyeo 夫余 (부여).
goguryeo was also called "goryeo of gao clan 高氏高丽," or "gao gouri/gaogoulí"
in china.
puyo/buyeo people was a tribe who spoke "manch-tungus language."
later, one of the branch tribes of yemac 濊貊 took over this kingdom by force,
and newly established goryeo 高丽, which was also called "goryeo of wang clan
王氏高丽" or "wang gouri."
goryeo people is the ancestor of modern koreans, but goguryeo people
is not theirs, but the ancestor of modern day manchurians.
Yaemaek people are only Korean's ancestors
Where ever Koreans originate, they carry O2 gene, very close to Han & Manchu. Japanese have very little O2 gene by comparison. Mongols have the least O2 gene.
Not chosun, but Joseon
The most comprehensive report firmly based on scientific findings!! Excellent!!
thanks for your kind words ...
Every Korean baby, either full or half, has Mongolian spot on their hip which disappears later. This shows they definitely have Mongolian heritage.
Mongolian spots are found in various populations around the world, particularly among people of Asian, Native American, African, and Hispanic descent. These birthmarks are caused by the presence of melanocytes (pigment cells) in the deeper layers of the skin and are a natural phenomenon.
I’m Korean, and my mom has a Mongolian spot on her inner thigh. Very interesting.
@@evoinception Babies in Iran and Turkey as well.
Not a surprise. Because Koreans and Mongolians really look alike. Even natives can't tell easily including me. Honestly Chinese and Japanese don't really look like Koreans
while there are visual similarities between Koreans and Mongolians, Koreans also share genetic ties and certain physical traits with both Japanese and Northern Chinese, making the distinction based on appearance alone more complex than it might seem.
As a Korean person, I can always tell the difference between a Korean and southern Chinese 100%. Northern Han Chinese are more similar to Koreans than southern Chinese, but still quite different. But when it’s a Manchurian Chinese, it gets more challenging to tell the difference.
The hardest is when it’s a Mongolian person. I personally think the sound of Mongolian language, the way Mongolians speak, the way they look, they look 100% like Koreans. I have never been able to differentiate between a Korean and a Mongolian.
As a Korean person, I personally really respect and love Mongolia and the Mongolian people and feel very close to them though I don’t know many Mongolians❤
thanks for being so kind and not trying to fight the facts, what is set in the past cannot be undone no matter. how much we want to belong to certain ancestry, you comment reflects empathy and understanding ...
Yup north Chinese are similar to Koreans. Especially northern Han but there are also many Korean Chinese and Manchu people In north China as well as Mongolian Chinese. There are many people in north China that are very similar to the Korean types. Also the facial features, skin tone, eye shape, shoulders and everything
And many Mongolians have similar features with Koreans too
And the high long tall thin nose sharp pointed nose and the long small thin face and high cheekbones and the cute mono eyelids and the very pale why t skin and they are all very tall
And the high long tall thin nose sharp pointed nose and the long small thin face and high cheekbones and the cute mono eyelids and the very pale why t skin
Lol this is only new to those that aren’t from Asia. People forget that Asia is a continent not one monolith country, culture, people, language or society. And that Asian is not a “race”, but a geographical term coined by white people. I’m apparently “Asian”, but genetically I’m Austronesian with Denisovan genome, as Austronesians and Melanesians/Papuans are the only ones with Denisovan in them.
You're right that Asia is incredibly diverse, both culturally and genetically. However, the claim about Denisovan ancestry is a bit off. While Austronesians and Melanesians do have Denisovan DNA, recent studies have shown that East Asians, including some mainland Asian populations, also carry Denisovan genetic markers. The idea that "Asian" is a simplistic or monolithic term doesn't capture the rich complexity and diversity of the continent's people.
Yes Asia is made up by Europeans. We shouldn’t be using their classifications in the post colonial age.
Actually this makes sense. There is little or no records of genocide in Korean history. Even when Shilla betrayed Goguryeo, Goguryeo people helped Shilla in fight against Tang. Plus there are plenty of records of people of various origins and races who immigrated to various previous states of Korea and settled successfully. Plus, Korea(Shilla) probably was the first state in Northern Asia to drop ritual killing traditions in burial in AD 502 which the Manchu carried over till like 17th C. Anyhow that probably accounts for why more gene samples remain intact in Korea per occupied land than other places.
Korea has always been subjugated by someone. Take the first half of the 20th century, that was genocidal. The movement of people into and out of the peninsula. Encouraging intermarriage, changing of names and language. The goal of Japan was to eradicate a people.
I don't believe in these so-called scientific things at all. It's ridiculous. There is no genetic order that can generally distinguish people from each other. Many characteristics in people, even slanted eyes, are related to more than one type of gene. Even within the same society, there can be different eyes, skin tones, and eye colors. Even a black family can have white children. All of these prove that humans come from a single type of gene. Probably, people who were different were discriminated against in prehistoric times and migrated to regions where they were more comfortable. The riddle of the origin of races can only be solved with the science of archaeology.
Plenty of Koreans were killed by Koreans unjustly for being North Korean sympathizers in the 1950’s. What do you think Japan was doing off and on through the years?
@@kristinesharp62861950s was when North Korea invaded South Korea with help of Russian pilots and 2million Chinese soldiers. 4 million Koreans died during this war. How many North Korean sympathizers were killed by South Korea?
Of the 2 million Chinese soldiers, half of them died. Most of Chinese soldiers sent to Korea were ex-army group from Kuomintang. Chinese Communist Party want to get rid of captured democratic Chinese army after Chiang KaiShek fled to Taiwan, so they were sent to Korea to die and kill South Koreans.
Fortunately, South Korean allowed any captured Chinese soldiers to chose where they can be returned either Communist China or Taiwan. Obviously, most chose to be returned to Taiwan. CCP opposed and threatened South Korea, but South Korean president was adamant that each soldiers should be able to decide that for themselves.
Little to no genocide!? Korea's history is literally riddled with genocide.. from Pre-silla unification all the way to Mongol invasions, Japanese Invasions and up to post WW2 Korean War..
This has anthropological significance in the larger picture of human migration, but I think people put too much focus on genetic data in the realm of the cultural, political, and personal. The Koreans have a culture and history they can be proud of. They accomplished much with little. Stronger enemies to the West, East, and North prevailed against the Koreans for relatively short durations, and Korean language and identity remained intact. We are all a mix of something and another thing.
You make a great point. While genetic data provides valuable insights into human migration and ancestry, it shouldn't overshadow the rich cultural, historical, and personal identities of people. Koreans have a unique and proud history marked by resilience and achievement. Despite facing stronger adversaries from the West, East, and North, they have maintained their language, culture, and identity for thousands of years. This cultural continuity and strength are testaments to their enduring legacy and contributions. Indeed, we are all a mix of different influences, but it's our unique cultures and histories that shape who we are.
The 1950 Korean War 朝鮮戰爭 (1955 Vietnam War 越南戰爭) is a war between China and the United States.
For more than 2000 years, the Korean ( & Nonth Vietnam , & Japan before the 13th century) has been Chinese territorial and local regimes. Official languages and texts are also Chinese languages and Chinese characters漢字(classic Chinese文言文) .
1910. Japanese occupation of the Korea (Chaoxian 朝鮮 , Real historical name - Chinese territory before 1910). Japan kills local Chinese officials (some Chinese escape back to other cities in China).
The Japanese abolished Chinese characters 漢字 in Korea (Chaoxian 朝鮮) . Korean language and characters (invention of the 15th century) of indigenous language began to popularize on the Korea ( Chaoxian 朝鮮 ) .
1950. With the help of the USA. Become an independent country (North & South), dominated by the Korean ethnic (white clothes Ethnic白衣民族). The official language is Korean language and Korean characters, which is only 70 years of korean history.
*** In the 15th century "Korean characters"( real history name 諺文 ). Created by local Chinese officials and Chinese scholars. It is used for local indigenous people and slaves (they speak Korean language).
In order to facilitate the directing of Koreans to work and serve as soldiers (specifically used to fight Japanese pirates to prevent them from invading Chinese territory).
The title says genetic origins, it has nothing to do with culture and politics that you are looking for.
@@baileyboy6246 Study the origin and history of Koreans. First of all, study why ancient Koreans wore clothes that exposed their nipples (which did not completely disappear until 1960) and why they used their heads to carry things (North Korea, which did not completely disappear until 2010) ).. These traditional customs come from the primitive tribes of black or brown people.
International linguist : It has already been proven that the KOREAN LANGUAGE is an isolate, meaning there is no other language like it nor can people trace the Korean language to any previous progenitor or originator (White Clothes Ethnic白衣民族real name in Chinese Chaoxian history ).
(The above content is a reference to real history and does not represent my own views.)
@@barbiebarbie1813 yea yea, idiotic Chinese propagandist
koreans are koreans
opa gangnam style
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍
Your making things too complicated : )
Gangnam is at Seoul. Seoulites are Seoulites.
Yes You are right 😂
😂
All I know it's they are beautiful people.
indeed, we all are beautiful ...
The human kind
Yes,beautiful with silicone and plastic surgeries for Korean ladies! How could slit-eyes be beautiful? Think!
It seems as though a great migration would have occurred during the last glacial period when the sea levels were low and Japan and Korea were connected by land. This based on your data would then originally give Japan a population based out of Siberia, Mongolia and Northeast China. An interesting thing is that a skeleton found in Idaho dated 9000 years ago was thought to be most closely related to the Annu people of Japan. The oldest Skeletal remains found in Japan are nearly 40,000 old.
While it is true that lower sea levels during the last glacial period connected Japan and Korea via a land bridge, leading to migrations, the details about ancient populations are more nuanced.Genetic and archaeological evidence indicates that ancient migrations did occur between Siberia, Mongolia, Northeast China, and Japan. These movements contributed to the genetic diversity of populations in these regions. However, these migrations were complex and involved multiple waves over thousands of years.The Ainu people, indigenous to Japan, have a distinct genetic makeup separate from other East Asian populations. Studies suggest that the Ainu have genetic links to ancient Siberian populations, supporting the idea of migrations from Siberia to Japan.The skeleton found in Idaho, known as Kennewick Man, was originally thought to be related to the Ainu or other East Asian groups. However, further genetic analysis revealed that Kennewick Man is more closely related to modern Native American populations ...
Not being an expert, my immediate thinking is that populations have either split / spread very lately or mixed very lately. Could be both: the former through geographic expansion, the second through trade.
excellent points, your idea of populations splitting through geographic expansion and mixing through trade is supported by genetic research and helps explain the complex ancestry of these groups...
DIfficult, considering the flux of different peoples caused by the successive wars in the region.
It's true that successive wars and migrations have caused a flux of different peoples in the region, leading to a complex genetic and cultural tapestry. However, despite these changes, genetic studies have shown distinct markers that identify specific populations like Koreans, Japanese, and others, illustrating their unique identities and historical connections. This complexity underscores the rich history and resilience of these cultures.
There is a significant misconception about the physical traits of Northern Asians, claiming that Siberians have bigger faces, smaller eyes, shorter heights, and smaller statures. In fact, this is not true. These misconceptions arose because measurements were taken by Russians in the 19th century among malnourished, impoverished native Siberians. These individuals were mistreated by the Russian colonial powers, forced to pay high taxes, and were unable to eat and dress properly in harsh climate conditions. They were often inbred, and the measurements were taken from small families with low sample variety, making any conclusions unreliable. For instance, you can't say that all Italians look like Danny DeVito just because he is Italian. Similarly, you can't say that all Siberians look as described. The improvements in diet can significantly impact a population, as seen when comparing the younger and older generations in South Korea. The older generation tends to have larger faces, shorter limbs, and smaller statures than the younger generation. The difference in height can reach up to 50 cm between generations. It is the same family and the same race, just with different diets.
You make a valid point about the influence of diet and living conditions on physical traits. However, it is important to clarify a few things. The idea that Siberians have certain physical traits like bigger faces, smaller eyes, and shorter statures isn't accurate and generalizing based on outdated or biased measurements is misleading. Modern genetic and anthropological studies show that there is a wide range of physical diversity among Siberian populations, just like in any other region.The improvements in diet and living conditions can indeed have a significant impact on physical development, as seen in many populations, including South Koreans. However, attributing physical traits solely to inbreeding and malnutrition from historical contexts does not provide a complete picture. Genetic diversity within Siberian populations, as well as among other Northern Asians, is broad and cannot be accurately summarized by outdated stereotypes or measurements.
@@evoinceptionmaybe cause denisovan dna, who make some different ethnicities have features like that.
Siberians aren't really "northern asians" they're eurasians. The original mestizos or more like reverse castizos OR maybe in language you're more accustomed to the product of rape/colonization of the original native indigenous western eurasian siberians by east Asian colonizers.
@@andrewlove3686 Actually, the Tagar culture in Central Siberia was indeed Europoid in origin, populated by migrants from the northern steppes. The Evenkis spread from Manchuria to Central Siberia relatively recently in historical terms, while the Paleo-Siberian groups also have Mongoloid ancestry, albeit somewhat different from Southern Mongoloids of East Asia. The Uralic people in Western Siberia have more Europoid ancestry, which increases from east to west. Ethnic Russians, on the other hand, are recent migrants to the region. Europoid people originally came from the northern steppes and also historically populated Europe relatively recently by either assimilating or replacing the local population. Irish, native Iberian, and other groups partially have this aboriginal ancestry in them.
I am curious if there was any relation to southern Indians. There is a legend that Gimhae Kims had a foreign queen named Queen Heo Hwang-ok from the Ayuta Kingdom.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heo_Hwang-ok
It was mentioned in the Samgukyuksa (History of the Three Kingdoms) in which King Kim Suro marries a princess from India (speculated as Tamil Nadu due to their naval technology then) and gives her the honorary title of Heo Hwang-Ok. It appears to be venerated as history as much as myth.
The connection between the Ayuta Kingdom and southern India is intriguing, but it's important to note that this legend is more symbolic and cultural rather than being based on verifiable historical records.
Oh....On phylogenetic Fst % view, Yes but we should leave final judgement to korean historian and linguist
@@evoinception actually there is a linguistic and culinary connection to Southern India. Google Korean and Tamil words on UA-cam. Even the many side dishes of Southern India look similar to Korean food.
@@richardkim412 Dravido-Korean theory has been debunked *MANY* times... It has no scientific basis whatsoever.
A great video! Thank you so much!! ❤
You are so welcome!
well made video. thanks
Glad you liked it!
I don't think so as it was made based on scientifical facts not on histrical facts.
@@MrProbludger The two are Not incompatible, they support each other. Much of prehistory is based only on small detailed archaeological findings, like pottery and stone tools and weapons, plus DNA samples. The sample sizes aren't huge, but large enough to be significant. The early history of regions all over the world are based on much smaller samples, for Korea finds such as the Stele of Gwanggaeto the Great, and the Samguk Sagi, which are at least partly mythological.
The very ancient land Bridge between the two continent's of Asia and North America! Also has has very close relatives to the very proud Korean people Today. The very proud great 🐋 whale hunters, yupik people of southwest and South central Alaska frontier settlements! Also far eastern Russia. Were they put settled down to there New homelands today! After a long migration from the Korean peninsula many thousands of years ago! The very proud yupik people! Also the Red deer scent the very proud native American indigenous tribal people of the North America! Has the close relatives of the V blood DNA test to the all of very proud people of the Asian continent! Especially the very beautiful Korean peninsula! My great inspiring message is out again! Have a very impressive beautiful 😍 day.
The idea that the Yupik people of Alaska and far eastern Russia are direct descendants of Koreans from thousands of years ago is a misinterpretation of migration and genetic history. While there is evidence of ancient migration across the Bering Land Bridge, which connected Asia and North America during the last Ice Age, this migration involved a variety of ancient Siberian populations, not specifically from the Korean Peninsula.
Oh....😅On phylogenetic Fst % view, Yes but we should leave final judgement to korean historian and linguist😂
You made a very informative and interesting video based on scientific research. But in the comment section, there are people from China, Africa, Vietnam, Mongolia, and even India that are claiming to be Korea's ancestors based on their imagination. I am flattered that many countries want a piece of Korea, just like the old times.
thanks for the kind words...
So says the expert! I guess you know better!
Koreans used to be divided into three major subcountries that had many wars with one another until Shila unified the penisula.
Many of Gokyurye worriors and their family escaped to Japan 2000 years ago. SO did many Pakjae people and they still have a Pakjae town in Sothern Japan.
The languages of the three Korean countries were slightly different as the north Gokurye had more influences from Mongo and Manchuria. THe language of Korea even 100 years ago is
more different than the modern Korean even more different than those between that UK and the USA!!
While some people from Goguryeo did flee to Japan after its fall, the idea that many Goguryeo warriors and their families migrated en masse to Japan 2000 years ago is exaggerated.
according to the liangshu 梁书, or the book of the liang dynasty, "paekch language
and its clothes are approximately same as goguryeo (今言語服章略與高麗同)."
even so, it is natural that language slightly varies by country, and changes with the
time period.
however, another point to note here is that the society of paekche had been of
"dual structure" in a fundamental way, and language differs depending on the
ppl's social position.
in this regard, a korean linguist lee ki-moon 李基文 (이기문) suggests that "ppl of
ruling class spoke the particular language in 'buyeo lines (夫余系统).'
meanwhile, ppl of the subject race (or indigenous ppl) commonly used the language in 'mahan lines (马韩系统)' as a whole."
therefore, it follows that these two ppls were ethnically different from each other.
@@evoinception No one knows how many whether a few or en masse. All they found out is that the Gokureo language is the root language of the Japanese language according to the language scholars!!
@@benkim2016
speculation by "the language scholars" you refer to is christopher beckwith's information
on the hypothetical goguryeo language, right?
beckwith merely took the 45% of japanese (or "japonic") words, and gave
primacy to that data.
in doing so, he concluded that this section of the place name data represents the real language of goguryeo, and is thus "the ancestor to the japanese
language."
in order to come to this conclusion, beckwith did several unorthodox
things.
for instance, he arbitrarily gave primacy to the japanese-like place names,
and completely ignored the plentiful korean-like ("koreanic") place names.
more recently, however, an alternative theory has been advanced by some
linguists such as alexander vovin, john whitman, and others.
indeed, there is more professional consensus among the theory expounded
by alexander vovin, or john whitman than with beckwith’s.
currently, no other linguists who are the experts in either korean language or
japanese one support beckwith’s stale theory (goguryeo place name data
showing only exclusive japanese relatedness).
in fact, such an outdated beckwith’s view as "gogryeo language is the
ancestor to the japonic language" does not have much academic support yet.
Gotta love all the revisionist chinese "history" comments. 🤡🤡🤡
Indeed☠️
현대인은 이동이 많기 때문에 알기 어렵지만, 일본에서도 지역에 따라 차이가 있습니다. 북쪽과 남쪽은 얼굴도 체격도 다릅니다. 홋카이도는 아이누가 있지만, 도호쿠에서는 이전보다 감소했지만, 지금도 눈 색깔이 다른 유전을 계승하고 있는 사람이 있습니다. 그들은 시베리아 혈통일까? 한국에서도 똑같이 눈 색깔이 다른 사람이 있나요?
시베리아와의 유전적 연결이 존재하지만, 이는 개인마다 다를 수 있습니다. 동아시아 전반의 유전적 다양성은 매우 복잡합니다.
This is not really a surprise for Koreans as most Koreans know that our ancestors are from Mongolia.
You should talk about yourself and not "most Koreans", still here is the what the study sheds light on - the study offers a more precise mapping of the genetic relationship between Koreans and other East Asian populations, including Mongolians. It highlights the complex genetic admixture that has occurred over thousands of years, showing that Koreans have not only Mongolian ancestry but also significant genetic ties with other groups like Japanese, Manchurians, and Northern Chinese.
@@evoinception Yes, you’re right and I can assure you most Koreans do know all that. For one, I know my Korean surname was originated from ancient China, so are many other Korean surnames.
But then again, that’s not really a surprise as we all are connected through our ancestors. People moved across all the time, in fact, we lived like gypsies in prehistoric times. I’m sure all Europeans are connected as well. For an example, just look at Queen Victoria’s children married off all over Europe, hence the haemophilia was found in Russian royals, and Viking’s blood runs in British through the history.
@@Ad_Astra2023 you must know, that in order to validate some thing scientific proof is needed, its not enough to say that my surname is such so i have this particular ancestry, we need every thing to be proven and this is what these studies do, every study is important ...
Seems like there are a lot of viewers who are interested in "the issue of languages" in this
comment section.
Some Koreans claim that "Japan used a language similar to the ancient Baekje language."
These people go so far as to insist that the Japanese and the Baekje people could communicate with each other without any interpreters those days. This fact is recorded in
"Nihon Shoki (日本書紀; 'The Chronicles of Japan')."
However, the Baekje language is almost extinct now, and there remain very few extant texts
written in this language.
Accordingly, we have no clue to verify whether Baekje language was really similar to
Japanese one or not.
By the way, in the tributary system of ancient China, the Chinese language played the
same/similar role as English in modern times.
Most likely, almost all the (tributary) states diplomatically used fluent Chinese language.
Therefore, when the Japanese people communicated with envoys from Baekje kingdom,
they mainly used Chinese language, it seems.
While the claim that ancient Japanese and Baekje people could communicate without interpreters is intriguing, it is largely speculative. The Baekje language is indeed extinct, with very few surviving texts. Historical records like the "Nihon Shoki" suggest interactions, but it is more likely that Chinese served as the lingua franca in diplomatic communications due to its widespread use in the tributary system.
@@lupimali9504 It's possible that by the 600s AD the Baekje language was different enough from the Old Japanese that they were not mutually intelligible. It's like Anatolian Hittite vs. Latin.
No way.
@@lupimali9504 Plain BS
Yamato set its sights on the Qin clan, who had fled to Baekje. The Qin clan is originally a descendant of Qin Shihuang, but is considered Jewish in Japan.
As a Korean, I’ve always been told that our people came from Mongolia. Who knows if it’s true. Interesting nonetheless.
The idea that Koreans have origins in Mongolia is a common misconception but not entirely accurate. While there has been historical interaction and some genetic influence from Mongolian and other northern Asian populations, Koreans have a distinct genetic and cultural identity.
Analysis of Korean and Mongolian genes showed that they were not the same at all.
For real, when I listen to Korean and Mongolian it sounds almost the same it took couple minutes to tell it apart. Yall are Mongolian tungus people
After watching the entire video and reading some of the comments, I have concluded that this video was 10% new information to me and the other 90% I already know. Let’s leave all visual information of a person aside and stick to genetics. Genetics tells us what a person is composed of and where they are from. Genetics rule.
While it's great that you're well-versed in this topic, this study does highlight some new and insightful points that might be new to others. For instance, the study reveals a significant male-biased genetic contribution from southern East Asia linked to the spread of rice agriculture, which wasn't widely understood before. It also underscores the unique genetic markers that set Koreans apart from their northern and southern neighbors, emphasizing a distinct genetic identity.
@@evoinception of course, there is a “distinct” identity. When you have a specific culture AND language, this signifies hundreds of years if not thousands of years of a similar group of people living in close proximity. Of course, their genetic pools gets mixed over time and in your words became a “distinct” genetic signature. Just look at the Germans; they are so close to all their neighbors, and yet if you do a genetic analysis, you will find a “distinct” genetic signature in most of the population minus recent immigrants. Anyways, if we don’t pick and choose which period of time the genetic analysis is done, we are all from Africa!
I'm Korean and I confuse mongols for Koreans lol very similar
Genetic analysis shows that Mongolians and Koreans are completely different genes
@@Edward90n2what do you mean completely lol you are a joker… like different species? Come on more precise use of the English language pls
One korean Princes ,was a daughter of King Ram chandra of Ajodhya India .The Historical story' from Korea is believed by most in India
this is a study on genetics and we must stay on the topic ...
"Ancient KOREA" (Western name) = = Gauli 高麗( 918－1392 ) & Chaoxian 朝鮮 (1392-1910) in real name in history . (all Chaoxian朝鮮 history is written in Chinese characters漢字 and classical Chinese文言文).
"KOREA/ Gauli 高麗 & Chaoxian 朝鮮 " is the name of Chinese territory and the Chinese region in ancient Western records. Before 1910, it was also a flag of Chinese territory and the Chinese region (Chinese Taoism logo). This is a recognized fact in the world.
White clothing Ethnic白衣民族 (today Korean ancestors) are just indigenous peoples in the southern part of the Chaoxian peninsula 朝鮮半島 . The language is Korean language 韓語. 98%is illiterate. Ethnic costumes are pure white (local Chinese wearing colorful Chinese clothes - hanfu漢服) and no patterns. Women's clothes are exposing nipples (this is a symbol of glorious). Every woman uses heads to carry anything. This is a traditional cultural characteristics (Korean culture).
Gauli king高麗國王(Goryeo king )and the Chaoxian King朝鮮國王 (they are both Chinese officials) both hate White clothing Ethnic白衣民族 (today Korean ancestors). This is mentioned in historical records and letters to the Chinese emperor.
After 1910, the Chaoxian peninsula 朝鮮半島 (Korean Peninsula) was occupied by the Japanese. The territory of the China Chaoxian Peninsula 中國朝鮮半島 was snatched. The Japanese and theWhite clothing Ethnic白衣民族 (today Korean ancestors) cooperated to invade other parts of China in the future. The Japanese killed and driven the China Chaoxian administrators Officials, nobles and officers, etc. to abolish Chinese characters漢字. It is forbidden to Korean women from exposing the nipples. Promoting the status of White clothing Ethnic白衣民族 . Push Korean language 韓語 and Korean characters韓字.
1945. Japan defeated and surrendered. He left the Chaoxian peninsula 朝鮮半島 (Korean Peninsula). The U.S. military occupied Japan (returned to Japan in 1960. The US military entered Ryukyu琉球).
In 1948, it was supported by the United States. The purpose was to set up a U.S. military base on the Chaoxian peninsula 朝鮮半島 (Korean Peninsula). The "TODAY KOREA 韓國" was established through the United Nations聯合國.
1953. The United States officially set up a military base in South Korea 南韓.
Therefore, the United States actually occupies Japan and South Korea, and now Japan and South Korea are just "fake independent countries". The purpose is to use regions to threaten China.
The above content is a reference to real history and does not represent my own views.
@@brajakishorepradhan7229 It is known that the Indian princess married to King of Kaya (Later merged to Silla, one of ancient Korea) and became a queen and ancester of the current Korean family name "Heo" there are still many "Heo" people lives in Korea. Because Kaya and Silla dominated current Shanghai and southern area, it was possible that Indian princess to travel there. And this is also the reason there are similarity between Tamil Nadu and Korean language, where we can think of there were trade and close relationship between India and Shilla in ancient days.
Is there actual evidence that some Koreans have Indian DNA??
Korea made the history of the ancient Chinese in Chaoxian 朝鮮 (Today Korea territory) into a historical TV series. Brainwashing foreigners.
In real history, ancient Korean tradition is a beautiful standard (Hanbok) for pure white clothes and women clothes to show their nipples (Westerners Record history photos). Ancient Korean traditional costumes are pure white (the Korean people have been known as the "White clothes ethnic 白衣民族-history record name" since ancient times), Korean women show their nipples to represent the beauty. All Women use their heads to move everything.This reflects the ancient Korean people and thoughts.
Historically, Korean women's clothes show their nipples (about 11 years old. After they get married and have children), until they are old .(Westerners Record history photos)..
Korean historical dramas are 95% fake. A large number of Chinese culture and Chinese historical elements are plagiarized directly.
------------------------
Real Korean traditional costumes (Hanbok)
In ancient Korea name "朝鮮chaoxian" (one of ancient Chinese city), . "white-clothed ethnic 白衣民族" (Today Korean ancestors) wearing this fully chest exposed Korean dress (hanbok) is an "honor" for many Korean women - because she has a son! If the woman does not have a son or has daughters, she is not eligible to wear this kind of dew suit - only a korean woman who has a son is eligible to show her chest. So instead of feeling ashamed, these korean women in dew clothes have the feeling of "I'm proud of having a son! I want the world to know!" The meaning of. At that time, when there was no scientific contraceptive measures, the vast majority of Korean women would eventually give birth to a son, so the vast majority of Korean women could finally wear "proud" dew clothes. So this dew suit is the real traditional dress in Korea!
Deliberately shirtless is a Korean tradition (hanbok), even in 2014. When the Pope visited South19 Korea, they also set up a "deliberately shirtless" statue to commemorate their tradition!
------------------------------
1910. Japan has swallowed Korea. The Japanese believe that some of the low -level Korean traditional culture and primitive (women expose their nipples and transport things on their heads) are very primitive and backward. The Japanese banned Korean women from exposing the nipples (the traditional Korean costume. Hanbok).
The Korean people strongly resisted. Koreans believe that this is a traditional culture of Korea. They insist on retention.
In the Korean capital city. As long as the Japanese see those Korean women who show their nipples, they will give them penalties and slaps. After that, the Korean capital city gradually reduces Korean women's nipples. They cover the nipples with a piece of cloth.
(But in the place where there are fewer Japanese soldiers. Korean women still maintain the traditional culture that exposes nipples).
Until 1950, Westerners were still taking photos in Korea. A photo of Korean women showing nipples on the street (traditional Korean clothing). In 1970, this kind of Korean traditional culture disappeared completely.
** "white-clothed ethnic 白衣民族" in history = the ancestors of the Korean .
(The above content is a reference to real history and does not represent my own views.)
As an ethnic Korean our genetic origins aren’t anywhere near surprising. I mean, we Koreans had to come from somewhere (we didn’t spontaneously spawn from thin air).
Ultimately, all human beings came from the plains of Africa.
You cannot speak for all ethnic Koreans. This study provides new and interesting facts previously unknown, such as the significant male-biased genetic contribution from southern East Asia linked to rice agriculture and the unique genetic markers that distinguish Koreans from their neighbors.
Out of Africa theory is just a theory to make everyone think we came from black people, because everybody feels sorry for black people for not having real historical civilizations like europeans and east asians created for themselves. in other words "We Wuz Kangz and shit!" Is what they wish their ancestors were. They want everyone to agree like "Yeah Ok Tyrone, your ancestor was the king of Egypt."
If all human beings came from Africa, we would have been dark
Stop bs
@@evoinceptionAs mentioned else where, rice domestication and last ice age also modifies your claim on the video. Ultimately it doesn’t matter how the gene pools are mixed, but the reasons are erroneous in the video.
Video claims rice cultivation from Han people group from Yellow river migrated to Korean Peninsula along with other people group coming to Korea.
Han people group (200BC) are descendants of HuaXia people (1000-1500BC) Earliest domesticated short grain rice found in Korea is carbon dated (7000-10,000BC) and verified by US university. Earliest domesticated short grain rice found in Canton China is carbon dated (6000-6500BC) by Chinese labs. So, Cantonese not Han Chinese came to Korean Peninsula 500-3500 years after the Korea was already populated. Han Chinese didn’t unite Cantonese at this time.
Yellow Sea was a fertile plain during last Ice Age (10,000-14,000 years ago). Southern East Sea (present Sea of Japan) was center of fishing and whaling according to Bangudae petroglyphs and 7000 year old oar found in Korea. Chinese central plain was mostly dry highlands.
Early humans migrated toward Far East Asia along India, Malaysia, Taiwan to Yellow Sea. And Northern route was through Iraq, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Baikal Lake, Manchuria, Korea.
China is surrounded by tall mountain ranges to North and West, and by impenetrable mountainous jungles to South. Easy entry to China is from Yellow Sea. Once in Yellow Sea, clean water is more accessible from Korean Peninsula than Chinese central plain due to mountainous hills of Korea provide clear streams than muddy river in highland plains. More shell mounds are found along the Korea than China. Earth science, rice cultivation and other Neolithic archeology points to more human settlements in Korean Peninsula side of Yellow Sea during last 15,000 years. However, as sea level rose up, people from Yellow Sea settled on both side of Yellow Sea, then nomadic warrior people came from Siberia who came and ruled the region 5000 years ago. Then Cantonese rice cultivation became important to feed more soldiers and Chinese rulers were effective utilizing Yangtze valley rice production to establish stronger China in recent history.
It’s ashamed that Asian people are against one another. Unlike European countries, they share their gene and cultures together. I don’t hear them mentioning which ethnicity is better than others. They’re much more united than other races; no wonder how far ahead they are.
this is a different topic unrelated to research, the way people think and how to influence it was not covered in the research ...
"Asian people" are spread across the 48 sovereign nations of the continent. "Asian" isn't a racial, ethnic or cultural group.
@@khuehuynh-richard5792 Um yes they do… literally a few generations ago they all were participating in WWII. And before that WWI and then before that tonnes of other wars. They just stand united when it comes to their view on every other non white cultures.
Yes NATO, EU, G7 and several other groupings show their close ties politically, economically, militarily. Asians don't have these major collective fronts. ASEAN is not that unified on issues, BRICS is an international front against Western hegemony. Also certain countries that lead those groupings like NATO and other alliances have an interest in keeping (East) Asians divided.
There are ~750 million people in Europe. There are ~7.5 billion people in Asia.
Thing is korea was invaded by Mongolians for around 90 years so I’m sure Koreans have Mongolian dna for sure.
you are right there is indeed a very small trace of Mongolian DNA present ...
As Korean/Japanese, thank you for the video.
Thanks for watching!
Everyone in this world is mixed with a little of everything!!
How is this to simplify this video?
Nope! According to the author… Koreans are unique from other East Asians
Koreans possess specific genetic markers that differentiate them from other East Asian populations. Studies have identified unique Y-DNA haplogroups like O2b and mitochondrial DNA haplogroups such as B5, which are prevalent among Koreans but less common in neighboring populations..
Isn’t there a Finnish and Turkish connection? The Finno-Ugric language group?
The connection between Finnish and Turkish through the Finno-Ugric and Turkic language groups is largely speculative. While there have been theories in the past, they are not strongly supported by modern linguistic research.
I'm also curious about the genetic influence of the Shandong Peninsula, particularly the Jiadong Peninsula, which is the closest region in eastern China to the Korean Peninsula. Notably, this region is known for having the tallest residents in China. It is said that there was significant interaction between this area and the Korean Peninsula in ancient times. According to historians, ancient Korean artifacts such as dolmens and pottery from the Gojoseon period have been discovered in this region. I wonder if there is any connection or influence from that. As for the Jiadong Peninsula (Jiaodong Peninsula), it is located at the tip of the Shandong Peninsula and was once separated by the Zhaolai River, making it almost like an island in the past, though it later became part of the peninsula. I believe that the DNA of the residents has been well preserved due to this isolation.
while these interactions likely influenced cultural practices, the genetic impact on Koreans from the Shandong region specifically is less pronounced when compared to influences from Northeast Asia, such as from regions around Mongolia and Siberia.
🟥[Fact Check - History of KOREA(KOGURYEO, KORYEO, SHILLA or JOSEON) in a nutshell] After Gojoseon, there were 3 Dynasties divided on Korean peninsula: Koguryeo, Baekje, and Shilla. Koguryeo was destroyed by Shilla on the Korean Peninsula: By Shilla Dynasty's suggestion, Tang Dynasty of the central China sent reinforcements, and Koguryeo was perished by the Shilla-Tang allied forces, so then Koguryeo was absorbed by Shilla. In the end, Shilla ultimately unified the 3 Dynasties and the Korean Peninsula was ruled by the Unified Shilla.
The capital of Koguryeo was Pyongyang, and afterwards, Pyongyang was the territory of the Unified Shilla. The Unified Shilla Empire used the term "Khan" for emperor like the Mongolian’s Yuan Dynasty used the same term and the emperor of Shilla called himself "Marip-Khan" and it was an empire on equal status to Tang Dynasty of China.
Following Unified Shilla Empire, there was internal Dynasty transition and Koryeo Empire emerged, and as its name implies, Koryeo(KOREA in English) was a country that succeeded Koguryeo.
The Mongolians of the northeastern region invaded central China, conquored the Han Chinese and established the Mongol Empire, and then invaded Koryeo. After the war, the Mongol emperor sent his daughter to Koryeo to be married with the majesty of Koryeo so that Koryeo has the son-in-law state relationship with Mongol Empire. Therefore, according to historical records, the Mongolians of the Mongol Empire treated the Koryeo people more highly than the Han Chinese, who were treated as the lowest class.
After the Mongol Empire was perished, the Balhae Dynasty in the northeast was founded by part of the Koguryeo refugees in the past and afterwards the so-called Manchurians (former Koguryeo people) established the Qing Empire in the northeast and the Koryeo people reinstated the Koryeo Empire in the southeast.
The Qing Dynasty, the empire of the Manchurians invaded and destroyed the Ming Dynasty of the Han Chinese in the central China and established the Qing Dynasty at the heart of China.
Manchurians,Mongolians,and Koreans are originally the same ethnicity of the northeast(Dongyi), called the Altai-Mongolian, using the Altai-Mongolian transformed languages, which is totally different language to the Chinese language.
Nowadays, Koreans call their country Hankook(한국/韓國) in Korean. The word ‘Han(한/韓)’ was pronounced ‘KHan’ in the past, which means not only ‘Great’ or ‘High’ but also ‘Emperor’ or ‘Empire’.
The claim that Manchurians, Mongolians, and Koreans are originally the same ethnicity is oversimplified. While there were historical interactions and some shared linguistic features, these groups developed distinct identities over time.
In terms of appearance, Chinese and Koreans look really different.
It’s important to understand that genetics provides a comprehensive view of ancestry and relatedness that mere physical traits cannot accurately convey.
@@evoinception What an attractive study!
Nope
I am not surprised at all. Similarities between chinese, Vietnamese, Japanese, Korean
i mistake these groups for one another all the time. give these groups the same clothing and make up and it would be very hard to differentiate
Viets aren’t included lol
@@ac4842 if that is your profile pic then you look pretty vietnamese to me. many chinese look viet and vis versa
@@cambodianpleasuresquad1753no, it’s not me and beside some very southern ones no one looks viet, stop daydreaming you guys are total south East Asians 😂
@@ac4842 vietnamese look closer to chinese than they do to cambodian. there is a reason east asian men like brides from vietnam. they look closer to you. and yes cambodians look different. we have way more sexual dimorphism
Recent dna studies show vietnamese dna, because all the farmers started marrying vietnamese girls over 2 decades ago.
The idea that recent DNA studies show a significant Vietnamese influence in Korean genetics due to marriages over the past two decades is a bit of a misunderstanding. Genetic studies look at population patterns over thousands of years, not just a few decades. While there's been an increase in international marriages, this wouldn't drastically change the overall genetic makeup of Koreans in such a short time. The long-standing genetic patterns still show strong links to other East Asian populations, not just recent influences.
それを言うなら結婚ではなくライタイハン問題でしょう
The modern East Asians we see are a mixture of northerners and southerners.
Northern: small eyes and single eyelid (typical Asian eye), thin nose and lips, white skin, large stature (taller), short limb proportions, wide and flat face
Southern: big eyes and double eyelid, thick nose and lips, brown skin, small stature (shorter), large limb proportions, small face (+ supraorbital elevation)
Contrary to the idea that Southeast Asians are discriminated against, modern East Asian beauty standards are mixed. For example, southern features such as large eyes, double eyelids, small face, and long limb proportions are preferred in East Asia. But I cannot deny it is true that northern features such as thin nose, white skin, and tall stature are also preferred.
While physical traits can vary across different regions, it's important to remember that genetics is much more complex than just physical appearance. Modern East Asians are indeed a mix of northern and southern ancestries, but the traits mentioned don't fully define genetic diversity. Genetics involves a vast array of factors beyond visible features.Physical traits alone are not a comprehensive indicator of genetic identity or heritage.
No such thing as “typical Asian eye”. This is racist! I’m “Asian” and I don’t have monolids nor do I have a flat nose and I am not mixed! Monolids are actually a result of human adoption to their environment especially the cold. I’m Austronesian therefore neither Sino Tibetan nor East Asian. Also unless black/Bantu, Melanesian/Papuan, none one are born with black skin. Sure we tan dark, but a dark tan isn’t actual skin color, but skin damage due to the sun!
Well Japanese have big eyes, mongolian also have big eyes, and asian from central asia also have big eyes.
This northerners and southerners theory is debunked long ago. Please note that modern day Southeast Asian actually originated out of China. The original tribes of Southeast Asia are Cambodians.
@@CoolNumber1 Mongolians have the smallest eyes wtf you talking about,
I don't know but I am more related to chimpanzees than Mongolians!
Nowadays so many other asian countries calling themselves origins of some sort of Korean race lol
😂 😂😂😂
No one is calling themselves Korean with out being connected. People are simply sharing their perspectives on history, which often highlights the similarities and connections between different Asian cultures.
Very few do that out of Korean Wave influences but most are proud of their own roots despite being culturally less prominent or outstandanding!!
Asia without Korea and Japan is sh1t.
@@AWESsum do not make such derogatory comments and demean the civilised people of Asia ...
@@evoinception In yo dreams
Just want to correct one tiny point. The two languages Korean and Japanese per se might sound distinctively different but it's roughly the same grammar.
While Korean and Japanese do share some grammatical similarities, such as subject-object-verb (SOV) word order and the use of particles, they are distinct languages with different vocabularies, phonetics, and writing systems.
@@evoinception They share the same origin, it's what I wanted to say. The Chinese and the Vietnamese are grammatically similar. For those who's interested in languages and can only pick one each from the two pairs, pick Chinese and Japanese. I'm a linguist and not a historian.
@@Arahansannihilation they are different language families with no clear origin what are you on about
@@chappy3125 No, they're not. I can even say they're related to Hindi and languages from that part of the world.
@@Arahansannihilation No not "Hindi". I think you're talking about Tamil language.
Two Vietnamese royalties settled in Korea about 900 years ago, and they've also had their own families and servants and private bodyguards with them, and many Chinese Ming loyalists during 17th century also settled in Korea, they might have contributed to that Southern East Asian Hg.
Vietnamese, there you go again. Associating yourself with East Asian. LOL.
thanks for sharing this info, will need to check for veracity
베트남 출신 난민 받아줬더니 무슨 지들이 한국에 주류로 정착한것 처럼 말하네. 베트남 왕자인지는
화산 이씨로 현재 화산 이씨는 1700명 정도 되는 아주 희귀한 성씨임
@@alephhan6742그렇게 예민하게 받아들이지 않아도 될거같은데
It's only one very small family line though. Most Lee's in Korea are not from this family line.
Based purely on geography and theories of evolution, it's quite logical to assume that Koreans, Northern Chinese, Mongolians, and Japanese are genetically related due to their close proximity. Unfortunately, history, logic, and common sense have been manipulated by the mainstream media. It's important for the younger generation of Koreans to watch this video.
thanks for your kind words and support to channel ...
First problem of genetic studies... China is an EMPIRE..
There is no one race in Chinese..
China used to be many kingdoms.. Many ethnic races.. More ethnic groups than there are today..
Koreans are connected to Northern Chinese and Manchus genetically
northern chinese weren't even chinese in ancient times. the term chinese is very vague.
@@jamin-r4k Because there was no such thing as Chinese people back then..it was different Tribes....the name Chinese is actually English translation..based on the Chin dynasty..
While it's true that China is highly diverse with many ethnic groups, genetic studies show that Koreans have distinct genetic markers that set them apart. Koreans have their own unique genetic identity, which is different from Northern Chinese and Manchus. Although there have been historical interactions, Koreans are not simply an extension of these groups.
@@jamin-r4kthe earliest chinese are the minans in the south. Later the Hans Chinese in the middle period. So its not vague, you lack understanding due to your ignorance. Are you a foreigner ?
@@evoinception That's because your findings rely more on science than actual history. You should know that science sometimes doesn't work the way it is supposed to be.
i love how objective this channel is. most east asians will not mention that they have Y dna paternal lineages from south east asia due to racism and nationalism.
genetics do not lie
love how some southeast Asians constantly portray east Asians as being racist all the while being racist against east Asians themselves. btw your comment comes off as you being some sort of an expert on all things east Asian with you being able to know the thoughts and beliefs of most east Asian.
@@jwo122 i have dealt with many east asians and most will deny genetic relations with south east asians out of ego and racism. i call a spade a spade. i don't even care what they think just stating a fact
@@jwo122 koreans would rather be genetically linked to europeans if that was possible it doesn't take a scientist to figure that out
@@cambodianpleasuresquad1753 Koreans are related to other NEA groups, and Southeast Asians are related to other SEA groups. What is racist about this way of thinking? Some of our ancestors travelled through SEA, that doesn't make us Southeast Asian. The majority of our ancestors came from what is now China, does that make us Chinese?
korean ancients and molgolia and the ching dynasty shares originally same root .. nomad tribe.. different from original chinese .
The Qing Dynasty seems to be the Ottoman Empire. It seems that it was distorted into the history of the Jurchen people. The Jurchen people, who are known to have founded the Qing Dynasty, are actually the people who founded the Joseon Dynasty, known as Korean history. The recent genetic research results of the Ashina Empress, a family member of the ruling dynasty of the 6th century Gokturk Empire, show that more than 90% of them were Northeast Asians. In other words, the Gokturks are the ancestors of modern Koreans. The people wearing hanbok in the video are Koreans, but they are not modern Koreans, and current Korean history is not the history of modern Koreans. I think the history of modern Koreans belongs to the history of the Gokturks.
While Koreans have historical connections with nomadic tribes from Manchuria and Siberia, their primary origins are distinct. The early Korean kingdoms, such as Gojoseon, Buyeo, and Goguryeo, were influenced by both the agricultural communities in the Korean Peninsula and the nomadic tribes from the northern regions, including the Xianbei and later the Khitan and Jurchen (Manchu) peoples.
@@ysa4473what the Your Fantacy😂
@@evoinception The Korean Peninsula was barely inhabited until the 17th century. It is a land where ancient civilizations could not have existed. And The Forbidden Land Voyages to the Corea, published in 1880, said that Seoul was called Paris at the time. There is a possibility that Korea could be the history of the Celts, etc. The three Taegeuk symbols found in Korean royal tombs are Celtic patterns that have also been found in ancient British houses, which you can find on UA-cam. The population of the Korean Peninsula exploded in the early 20th century, and Korean independent history community believes that this was due to immigration from America. Furthermore, they believe that the Americas are considered the homeland of not only modern Koreans, but also of all mankind.
@@8messaya Maybe your fantasy
I recently learned that the Sumerian word of Sky or God, Din-Gir, could be related to Tengri (God) of Central Asian culture. It is interesting that the first ruler of Korean people was called Dan-Gun, Son of Hwan-Ung (Sky God) and the bear lady (likely a woman from the Bear worshipping local tribe). Din-Gir, Tengri and Dan-Gun could have the same origin.
While it is fascinating to explore potential connections between ancient cultures, there is no solid evidence to support a direct link between the Sumerian "Din-Gir," Central Asian "Tengri," and Korean "Dan-Gun."
@bbokdoong
That's a good observation.
Having said that, is it OK with you to point out that Dangun has the same origin as
other mythical beings?
”Dangun Joseon” is the Koreans' source of pride, so it is convenient that Dangun
must have actually existed for them, isn't it?
Seems like your inference like this indirectly deny the existence of Dangun Joseon
itself.
@@lupimali9504 I am just curious of the origin of those words that share similar sound and definition despite the physical distance between Baghdad and Seoul. Sumerians and Hwan-Ung's group were not natives of those regions. They both came from outside with advanced culture and technology. They mixed with locals and established new culture. Why would such inference deny the existence of Dangun Joseon? The fact that Sumerians came from outside does not deny the existence of Mesopotamia.
@@bbokdoong Thanks for your reply.
(As the sentence of mine is too long, I'd like to separate the contents into two parts)
PART 1:
Dangun first appears in "Samguk yusa" compiled by Buddhist high monk of
Goryeo Il-yeon (一然, 일연), who says in this history book that he quoted
Dangun from "Weishu (魏書)" and "Joseon Gogi (고기)" as the source.
However, there is no mention of Dangun in Chinese historical books such as
"Weishu," Chin Shou's "The Chronicle of the Three Kingdoms," and Wei Shou's
"Northern Weishu."
Furthermore, the Joseon Gogi" is said to be a forged document.
By the way, Josh Smith & Jeongmin Kim's 'North Korea's box of bones:
A mythical king and the dream of Korean unification' says as follows:
・"There is not even a semblance of proof for the glorious king or the
thousands of years of Korean unity Dangun is said to have founded."
・"Scholars say the chances that Dangun actually existed are approximately close to zero. Lee Chung Kyu Yeungnam University archaeologist declared
that Dangun is nothing but a myth."
Indeed, Dangun, or some existence that corresponds to Dangun, is unmentioned
at all in "Samguk sagi" completed in 1145.
Thus, the existence of Dangun is usually treated as a myth and not regarded as historical fact, and there is littele evidence that a kingdom named Dangun Joseon actually existed.
@@bbokdoong
PART 2:
Now, the word "Dangun Wanggeom (단군왕검)" was originally a combination
of two gods, Dangun and Wanggeom, who had different origins.
In 'the Samguk Sagi,' the name Wanggeom (王倹, 왕검) appears as the
name of a legendary hermit who once lived in Pyongyang.
Furthermore, there are parallel traditions to the Dangun myth, including the
Fuyo founding myth and "the beast ancestor myth" that has been passed
down amongst several Tungusic tribes.
Supposedly, Il-yeon, bringing together these different tales, made up the
Dangun myth. I'm not sure, but it's probably true.
Lastly, according to Jeong Young-Hun, a professor at Seoul’s Academy of
Korean Studies, "the legend of Dangun plays a lasting role in promoting
unification because it portrays Koreans as a homogenous group destined
to live together. ... Dangun is a basis for Koreans to feel the necessity for
pursuing harmony and unification, and is a basis for seeing unification as
something possible."
Similarly, Michael J. Seth, a professor of Korean history at James Madison
University in Virginia, maintains like this:
"In both Koreas, Dangun has been used to emphasize the uniqueness, the
singularity, homogeneity and antiquity of the Korean people, ...
Whether a real person or not, he is used by both Koreas to emphasize the
unity as well as the uniqueness of the Korean people.”
There will be Chinese, Mongolian, and Siberian mixes for Korea are right in the middle.
Additionally, modern Japanese people are a mixture of 95% Yayoi (Korean Peninsular) and 5% Jomon (Japanese indigenous people). The Ainu people are considered to have a higher proportion of Jomon people.
Therefore, Japanese people are descendants of Siberia + Mongolia + China + Jomon people
back then there were no Chinese, Mongolian, Koreans and Japanese. We can only trace up to about 400~800 years of family genealogy.
It's true that Korea's geographical location has led to historical interactions with Chinese, Mongolian, and Siberian populations. However, Koreans have maintained a distinct genetic and cultural identity despite these influences.
@@evoinception 💯💯💯💯💯‼️‼️‼️
@@yuchan063 No chimps?
Yeah mongolian and korean are the same
While Mongolians and Koreans share some historical and genetic connections, they are distinct ethnic groups with their own unique languages, cultures, and histories.
Korea's popolation density is 3rd in the world.
It means that Korean are consist of so many Asian , who mainly comes from northern area.
Norther & Central Asia were difficult to live , because of nature disaster and many conflict with other clans.
Until 18c , population densities of that area were 1/(a few hundred ~ thousand) of CH or KR.
Firstly, while South Korea does have a high population density, ranking among the highest in the world, this doesn't mean that the Korean population is a recent mix of various Asian groups. The high population density is a result of modern urbanization and economic development, not a sudden influx of people from other regions.Secondly, the idea that Korea's population is primarily made up of people from Northern and Central Asia due to harsh living conditions in those areas is oversimplified. Korea has had a distinct and continuous population for thousands of years, with genetic studies showing deep roots in East Asia. While there have been historical migrations and interactions with neighboring regions, the Korean population is not just a mixture of recent migrants but has a unique and well-documented genetic lineage.
So does that mean there’s truly no such thing as a Korean who is 100% Korean? That every single Korean who walked the earth has some genetics from surrounding areas, whether it’s Manchu, Siberian, Japanese, Mongolian, Chinese, etc?
If that’s the case, not all Koreans would have genetics from the same place. In other words, some Koreans would have Chinese genetics while other Koreans wouldn’t, right? Then there would be other Koreans who would have Siberian genetics but not Chinese, etc. If Koreans are a mix not all of them can possibly have the exact same genetics from other areas. Some do, some don’t. Would that be correct?
I’m half Korean myself and I’ve seen Koreans with light skin and darker skin, some with mono lids , others with a fold in their eyes, etc. That tells me Koreans have different genes from each other and are from different areas outside of the Korean Peninsula.
Is this all correct?
It's important to understand that no human population is "100%" genetically isolated. Throughout human history, populations have migrated, explored, and intermixed with one another. This includes Koreans, who, like all humans, have genetic contributions from various ancient and neighboring populations.For example, humans have inherited genes from Neanderthals, Denisovans, and other ancient hominins . These contributions are part of our shared human heritage and are present in varying degrees across different populations.Regarding the diversity among Koreans, some with lighter or darker skin, different eye shapes, etc. these differences can indeed reflect the varied genetic influences from surrounding regions like Manchuria, Siberia, Mongolia, China, and Japan. However, this diversity doesn't undermine the shared cultural and national identity that Koreans have developed over millennia.The concept of nation-states and fixed national identities is relatively modern, but human history is full of movement and interaction between groups. So, while it's true that Koreans, like all people, have mixed ancestries, this doesn't diminish the importance of cultural and national identity. Instead, it highlights the rich and interconnected history of humanity.
Very good video! But let me list some points which might be different from yours. Let's check from three sides, Y-DNA, mt-DNA, and autosomal DNA. In terms of mt-DNA North Chinese, Koreans and Japanese are very similar, there is no need to compare it. For Y-DNA, NC and K share O2a and C2c, K and J share O1b2, so for Y-DNA K is more similar to NC. For autosomal DNA, K is located between NC and J, however the similarities vary from north to south, Koreans live next to China bordered are more close to north Chinese and those live in far south region are more close to west Japanese.
just visit the following site, and take a look at the chart of
"East Asian Y-haplogroup Frequencies" ↓
【The Origins of the Japanese people Wa-pedia】
then, u will find out the fact that "gene sequences of the koreans are
approximately same as the manchurians, and fairy different from the japanese."
While Koreans and North Chinese do share Y-DNA haplogroups like O2a and C2c, and Koreans and Japanese share O1b2, it's important to note that these shared haplogroups don't imply identical genetic profiles. The frequency and distribution of these haplogroups vary across regions, contributing to the unique genetic identity of each group. Koreans have their own specific Y-DNA patterns, particularly with the high prevalence of O2b (O-M176), which is less common in North Chinese populations...
Based on Y−DNA, Japanese people have 40% of Jomon DNA. So, Japanese and Korean people have quite different DNA
Ok. Nice to learn more ok ❤
thanks for your support ...
한국인으로서 한국어가 고립어라는 데 동의하지 않음. 한국인과 일본인이 대화할 수는 없지만 그건 단어와 발음이 다르고 문자도 따로 쓰기 때문일 뿐, 언어 구조와 문법은 거의 똑같습니다. 때문에 한국인은 일본어를 매우 쉽게 배웁니다. 일본은 한글에 대응하는 자체 문자가 없고 발음이 제한적이어서 한국어 배우기가 쉽지 않지만 문법은 같기 때문에 역시 다른 언어보다는 한국어가 훨씬 쉽습니다. 같은 이유로 몽골인도 한국어를 매우 쉽게 배웁니다. 서양 언어학에서 고립어를 규정하는 척도가 뭔지 모르겠지만 일본어와 한국어가 한 줄기에서 나왔다는 건 너무 명확합니다.
한국어와 일본어가 문법적으로 유사한 점이 있지만, 이 두 언어가 같은 기원에서 비롯되었다고 단정짓기는 어렵습니다. 한국어와 일본어 모두 교착어로서, 주어-목적어-동사(SOV) 어순을 가지고 조사와 접미사를 사용하는 등 문법적으로 비슷한 구조를 공유합니다. 그러나 이러한 유사성은 동일한 기원을 의미하는 것이 아니라, 역사적 언어 접촉이나 독립적인 발전 과정에서 유사한 언어적 특징을 공유하게 되었을 가능성이 큽니다.특히, 어휘, 발음, 문자 체계에서 두 언어는 상당히 다릅니다. 한국어는 한글을 사용하고, 일본어는 한자와 가나를 혼용하는 복합적인 문자 체계를 사용합니다. 이러한 차이점은 두 언어가 독립적으로 발전해왔음을 시사합니다. 서양 언어학에서 한국어를 고립어로 분류하는 이유는 다른 언어와의 직접적인 관계가 명확하지 않기 때문이며, 이는 한국어가 독립적으로 발전해왔음을 반영합니다.
@@evoinception What writing system was used by Koreans before Hangul?
@@andreastano7920 Chinese characters
The same grammar can't be the basis that it's not an isolated word
@@evoinception Ancient Turks also originated in South Siberia and Mongolia then migrated to Central Asia and onwards through the millenia. Turkish is also agglutinative, SOV etc. Strangely enough, Turkish people can learn Korean and Japanese easily (setting writing systems aside for the sake of simplification) though interrelations with Japanese were nearly non-existent. What you have stated above is is also valid for Turkish; not related but 'related' 😂
Insightful study but what is more insightful and fun is reading the comments where everybody is trying to prove his/her POV. Same within the Turkic World though.
Greetings from Türkiye.
I’ve also heard that the mono lid eye originated from far up north near the arctic, have you heard something like that? Due to the bitter cold, the mono lid evolved to protect the eyes.
Also, what about naturally dark brown haired Koreans? Most Asians have black hair but why do some have dark brown hair?
The idea that monolid eyes (eyes without a visible crease) evolved as an adaptation to cold climates, particularly in the Arctic, is a popular but not scientifically confirmed theory.
Being that Korea is between Japan China and Mongolia, u don't need All this research to figure that out
It's easy to assume that geography alone explains everything, but that's an oversimplification. This research delves into the unique genetic markers, migration patterns, and cultural exchanges that have shaped Korean identity over thousands of years. It provides concrete data on how Koreans are genetically distinct from their neighbors despite geographic proximity, highlighting the complex interplay of history, genetics, and culture. Simply put, the research offers insights that go far beyond what you can guess just by looking at a map. So yes, this research is essential to truly understanding the uniqueness of Korean heritage.
Vietnamese dna can be from a royal family in Vietnam that took refuge to Korea after their kingdom came to and end hundreds of years ago. I can’t recall the last name but there are many descendants living in Korea today. It was not unusual for ancient Korea to accept royal families from fallen kingdoms from other Asian nations.
While the influence on Korean DNA from this lineage would be minimal due to the relatively small number of individuals, the story is a significant cultural link between the two countries.
화산 이씨입니다.
Im Vietnamese and the two royalties makes absolutely no difference in the make up of Korean DNA, its too small and negligible. Its a cool story but thats it, do not think it would somehow have an effect on todays Korean population DNA. We are most similar to Southern China, being Guangdong, Yunnan Hong Kong.
Only 1700 descendants alive today.
I wonder if Koreans and Turks share some common origin. They both have similar bath houses and obsession with exfoliating the skin. The Turkish word for mother is 'anne' and one of the words for wife in Korean is 'anne'. (pronounced 'anneh' with a silent h, not 'Annie'). Words like mother, father etc sound very much alike in language families. But mostly because their languages really have the same melody and sound very alike.
rather, as a korean linguist Woo Shil-ha 實禹夏 (우실하) suggests,
korean language is very similar to "evenki language 鄂温克语".
he took up the issue of the etymology of such words as 'arirang (아리랑)'
and 'ssurirang (쓰리랑)', and concluded that these two languages may have
the same root.
likewise, Dr, Kang Deok-su 姜徳洙 (강덕수) offers the same opinion:
"한국외국어대 러시아어과의 강덕수 교수는 '사하공화국 남북 변방에 사는 에벤키인들이 쓰는 에벤키(퉁구스)어가 우리말과 근원이 같으며 이들이 쓰는 숫자나 일가 친척을 일컫는 단어는 우리말과 매우 유사하다'고 말했다."
While there are interesting linguistic and cultural parallels between Koreans and Turks, these similarities are not necessarily indicative of a shared origin.
@@evoinception Of course. They just sound very similar to me. They do come from the same neck of the woods.
@@dandylion3783 Interesting!
Korian aka Tepehuanes Tribe 🧬 in Durango Mexico ❤️🔥🪽☝️💯🦂
#ComptonCaliLove
Tuatha De Danaan Acacia 🩸
There is no direct connection between Koreans and the Tepehuanes tribe in Durango, Mexico. The Tepehuanes are an indigenous group native to Mexico, with their own distinct culture and history, unrelated to Korean heritage.
우리 할아버지가 항상 우리는 시베리아에서 내려왔음을 잊지 말라고 하셧는디 이 영상을 보니 기쁘네요 ㅋㅋ
tungusic ppls are an ethnolinguistic group formed by the speakers of tungusic languages。
these ppls are native to siberia, northeast china, and mongolia.
the term of "tungusic" is derived from a russian 'tungus (tунгус)', an exonym
of the russian words for the 'ewenki/evenki'
indeed, dr. woo shil-ha 實禹夏 (우실하) suggests that "evenki tribe 鄂溫克族 and
the koreans have a same origins in various fields" while taking up the issue of the
etymology of such words as 'arirang (아리랑)' and 'ssurirang (쓰리랑)'.
certainly, evenki tribes and the koreans are strangely similar in appearance.
small and single-fold eyelids, high cheekbones, flat nose, and flat square face.
on top of this, korean totem poles such as sotdae (솟대) or jangseung (장승) are
approximately same as the evenki ones.
보시고 기쁘셨다니 저도 기쁩니다. 관심 가져주셔서 감사합니다
Thank You! But I wonder how Korean and Tibetan is related!!!!
thanks, this would make a good comparative study ...
Korean with close genetic tie to Yunnan (Southern Chinese), Vietnamese and Philippinos is certainly new to me, always thought they are much closer to Japanese.
It's a common misconception that Koreans are only closely related to Japanese people. While Koreans do share some genetic similarities with the Japanese due to historical interactions, genetic studies have also shown that Koreans have ties to other East and Southeast Asian populations, including those in southern China, Vietnam, and even the Philippines.These connections stem from ancient migration patterns across Asia, where populations moved and mixed over thousands of years.
rather, koreans are approximately same as the manchurians from a genetic
point of view.
indeed, genetic similarities between koreans and manchurians are obvious,
and fairly different from the gene sequences of the japanese ppl as a whole.
on top of this, woo shil-ha 實禹夏 (우실하) argues that "evenki tribe 鄂溫克族
and the koreans have a same origins in various fields" while taking up the issue
of the etymology of such words as 'arirang (아리랑)' and 'ssurirang (쓰리랑)'
likewise, dr, kang deoksu 姜徳洙 (강덕수) offers the same opinion:
"한국외국어대 러시아어과의 강덕수 교수는 사하공화국 남북 변방에 사는 에벤키인들이 쓰는 에벤키(퉁구스)어가 우리말과 근원이 같으며 이들이 쓰는 숫자나 일가 친척을 일컫는 단어는 우리말과 매우 유사하다고 말했다."
@@dandylion3783Personally I think Koreans are quite closely related to Mongolians, based on facial features and their languages. Since I don't understand both Koreans or Mongolian, therefore, I can tell the sounds quite similar ( when you cannot understand a language, you can hear how the sounds of a language come across more clearly). Whereas, the Japanese are almost definitely closely related to the Manchurians, based on several factors I have observed; their surnames, which consist of two words. Their half shaven heads with a pony tail in men. Their raw meat eating habits. And the traditional shoes! Never heard the Manchurian language, therefore, can't compare it with Japanese?
@@katiecheung7993
similarity of facial features between koreans and mongolians is ambiguous.
peoples in east asia look very much alike in general. indeed, there are some
chinese and japanse who look just like mongolian too.
as for the matter of surname used in both manchu and japan, there had once existed the surnames that consisted of two (some 4000 names), or of three words (about 2000 names) in ancient china, too.
you have heard of the names of 諸葛 亮 (zhuge liang), 司馬 懿 (sima yi),
公孫 瓚 (gongsun zan), or 夏侯 淵 (xiahou yuan) in "the romance of the three
kingdoms," haven't you?
incidentally, in shanghai dialect that stemmed from 呉語 (wu-gniu), there are
so many similar words as the japanese ones.
as for their half shaven heads with a pony tail in men and their raw meat
eating habits, I don't know in detail. therefore, I have nothing more to say
concerning these issues here.
at any rate, why not visit the following site, and take a look at the chart of
"East Asian Y-haplogroup Frequencies"? ↓
【The Origins of the Japanese people Wa-pedia】
then, you will find out the fact that "the gene sequences of koreans are
approximately same as manchurians, and fairy different from the japanese.
also, you will notice that the gene arrangement of mongolians is isolated,
and very unique.
@awaysooner Vietnamese r from Chna originally was mentioned multiple times only, not the Philippinos r not from China was not mentioned 🙄
Patience and kindness, my friends, time will put all in order.
very philosophical
My old Japanese teacher thinks he’s Caucasian. I think presence of military bases will dictate what people think.
The presence of military bases doesn't change the genetic identity or racial heritage of a population. Your Japanese teacher's belief about being Caucasian is a personal perspective and not based on genetic facts.
Have you heard of the caucasian Ainu people of Japan. They were there before it was colonised by the Japanese.
Not so Caucasian looking now . But there is a reason for that .
The original Japanese people looked like Eskimos not caucasian.
@@titot2370 mythic japan, mythic caucasians........mythic histories.
@@georgehunter2813 Hitler declared Japanese peoples honorary Aryans, also "honorary white" has been used to describe certain racial groups, including East Asians like the Japanese, Koreans, Hong Kongers, and Taiwanese during apartheid in South Africa.
Yes we have many unstoppable conflicts against Japan however it's not like hating to the people but it's for political issues
this study was focused on genetics and not on political issues ...
Recent findings and discovery of early human civilization in South Central China points to the evolution of humans not from Africa alone but from different origins. Historical records stated that many Koreans are Chinese origin immigrants from the ancient Yellow River regions .
You must be working under the CCP as a stooge. I'm pretty sure that you have been brainwashed and trained to be like that. Having said that I feel very sorry that what you're saying is not recognised by the world. That's the reason why the Chineses have been hated by them. I don't know why the Chinese alway put their heads in the sand and never listen to the truth. So that's why people say that the Chinese have been kept in dark and fed on shit by the CCP. It is called the absolute truth!
Regarding Koreans and their origins, historical and genetic evidence indicates a complex ancestry. It's true that some Koreans have ancestral ties to regions like the Yellow River in China. However, Koreans also have genetic contributions from northern populations, such as those from the Altai-Sayan and Baikal regions. This reflects a mixture of influences rather than a single origin.
Some say Eskimo
can you elaborate more on your comment ...
Mongol was originated from old Korean dynasty
“”””Kuri (==Kori ==Kokuri==Gogureo)””
and Balhae dynasty nomad ppl
After Balhae dynasty had collapsed
We Korean and Mongol got separated
The Mongols are historically and culturally distinct from Koreans. They originated from the Mongolian Plateau in Central Asia, not from Korean dynasties. The Mongol Empire, founded by Genghis Khan in the 13th century, has its roots in the steppe nomadic cultures of Mongolia.
At the end of the day, the Chinese are chinese and the Koreans are themselves, so r the Japanese people & there should be mutual respect for each other as human beings , first & foremost.! The rest of it r politics.
you make some good philosophical points ...
몽골치하에 엄청난 수의 고려여성과 남성들을 데리고 갔었으며 일본치하에도 똑같았습니다.. 또한 서로의 나라에서 피난을 오는 경우도 많구요 유전적으로 가면 비슷한 점이 많을건 당연하지만 그래도 각국의 유전적 특징이있으며 매우 다릅니다. 서로의 나라에서 찾을수없는 형체도 많기때문입니다.. 또한 수천년간 내려온 문화도 다릅니다. 그것또한 서로 전파되어 섞였을 수 있지만 각 나라의 특징을 가지고 있습니다. 서로의 문화를 인정해주고 역사도 같이 이야기하며 하나의 역사책을 만들었어야 했는데 지금은 너무 멀리 와 버린 것 같네요.. 그래도 서로를 인정하고 평화롭게 지내는 이웃이면 좋겠습니다. 모두 제발 사이 좋게 지냅시다.
What about the alleged genetic link between south Indian Dravidian people and Koreans ?
According to an ancient Korean myth. An Indian princess and her court came to Korea in search for a husband and stayed in Korea and created a lineage that over centuries mixed over the entire Korean population.
its a myth tbh
Maybe the strong presence of O-M122 mentioned in the video attests to the Dravidian mix. It is known fact that authentic Korean vocabulary has significant common denominators with Dravidians when it comes to the words relating to agriculture and family/childcare while livestock and animal husbandry vocabulary seems to align with Pan Eurasian languages spoken by the nomads, thus perfectly proving the North and South mix theory of the video.
The story of an Indian princess marrying a Korean king is a cherished legend, but genetic evidence does not support link between South Indian Dravidian people and Koreans.
@@evoinception Korea, south India are all part of a large maritime network. you can see the korean/japanese style traditional houses even today in parts of south India (such as kerala). 9-11th century cholas controlled entire bay of bengal rim, stretching their empire as far as indonesia. but the maritime network existed even before that. thats how Bodhi Dharma (Daruma san) from Tamil Nadu in south india went all the way to China and spread buddhism there, which eventually spread to korea/japan. this shows that india and east asia were connected by sea.
@@evoinception It's not particularly cherished, it's more of a mysterious old tales and serves no particular didactic purpose so it must be sourced from true events. Furthermore as other comments have alluded there was a maritime sea trade from Korea, Japan all the way to South India Kerala. The common words in the vocabulary are hard to ignore and not found in other countries. If a princess and her whole court of hundreds people did settle in Korea, it's easy to see how that many people mixed not just the princes.
It's not true that there are no genetic evidences, only that you have not found them yet.
The language groups are also important; the Koreans are part of the Altaic language group. They share similarities with Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic and Japonic languages. It is clear their genetics are also similar to the these same groups.
Everyone Google altais language family. Lol
It's a widely debunked language family not supported by any real evidence save for use by pan turanist and pan Turkic groups.
Actually, the idea that Korean is part of the Altaic language group has been largely debunked by linguists. While there are some similarities, like agglutination and SOV word order, these are likely due to cultural and linguistic exchanges rather than a common origin.
There seem to be a handful of people still very attached to the Altaic language group. A friend of mine is a Mongolia expert and she had a professor at Princeton who seemed still quite committed to it. I’m just some guy, but I have learned a decent amount of Korean and some Japanese and I find the cultural and linguistic exchange theory a lot more compelling. But, in practice, I’m not sure how much difference it really makes whether two languages are genetically related, or just heavily influenced by each other.
@@ChrisFarrell There is a book by C. Beckwith that claims there is a genetic relationship between Koguryeo language and old Japonic language. I think the author used old Koguryeo places names from it's former territory to construct some of its language to make his case. I think the ancient records show that the 3 kingdoms didn't understand each other especially, Silla. Koguryeo and Baekje people could somewhat understand each other, due to their shared origin histories, but they probably diverged over the 700 years they were each in exsistence.
I think the idea that the Korean language is Altaic is very logical. I think the theories that say the languages should not all be in the Altaic language group are simply not well founded and don't look at the big picture.
Culturally, they are more close to Chinese and Japanese,
While Koreans share some cultural similarities with Chinese and Japanese, they have their own distinct culture with unique traditions, language, and customs that set them apart.
@@evoinception Didn't Koreans adopted the Confucianism from China ? Their using of Chinese characters too. Or Chinese Buddhism that incorporates Taoism and Confucianism.
That is due to Koreans and Japanese adapted Chinese version of Buddhism and Confucianism. Nothing to do with genetics tbh...
@@xgfreedomculture and language from China not just Buddhism.
@@quyenluong3705 I would say burrowed words but not language. Cultures? Yes like I said Confucianism was heavily influential and Confucianism has strong idea of sinocentrism. Still nothing to do with genetics
So Japanese hating Korean is almost like self hate?
KOREAN = SANSKRIT/// 한국 말과 음과 뜻이 거의 똑같아서 놀라운 산스크리트어 단어들은 너무나 많지만 대표적인 것들을 옥스포드 출판사에서 발간한 산스크리트어 사전에서 찾아 제시해본다.
★악(惡):도덕적 기준에 어긋나 나쁨. 또는 그런 것.
★aka(아까, 1p): sin(죄)
★agh(악, 6p):sin(죄), to go wrong(잘못 감)
●가망(可望): 될 만하거나 가능성이 있는 희망.
●ka~mam(까~맘, 273p):
according to desire(희망과 일치함)
★꾸짖다: 엄하게 나무라다
★kutsita(꿑시따,290p):reproach(꾸짖다)
●나무람:상대방의 잘못, 부족한 점을 꼬집어 말하다.
●namri(나무리, 528p):humilliate(굴욕감을 주다)
★어질다: 마음이 너그럽고 착하며 덕이 높다.
★adruh(어드루ㅎ, 19p): free from malice(악의 없는)
●아무개:
어떤 사람을 구체적인 이름 대신 이르는 인칭 대명사.
●amuka(아무까, 82p):
a person referred to without name(이름 언급없는 사람, 아무개)
★우뚝하다:
1)두드러지게 높이 솟아 있는 상태이다.
2)남보다 뛰어나다.
★utkata(우뜨까따, 175p):
exceedding the usual measure(보통이 아니다)
uneven(평범하지 않은, 뛰어난)
●우두커니:
넋이 나간 듯이 가만히 한자리에 서 있거나 앉아 있는 모양.
●utkanntha(우뜨까니타, 175):
having the neck uplifted(목을 쭉 빼고 있는),
longing for(그리워하는)
missing a person(누군가를 그리워하는)
★우따메: 좋음을 표현하는 전라도 사투리
★uttama(웉따마,177p):
uppermost(최고의),best(최선의), excellent(아주 좋아)
●알랑거리다:
남의 비위를 맞추거나 환심을 사려고 자꾸 아첨을 떨다.
●ulla~ngu~la(울랑굴~라, 219p):
with upraised tail(꼬리를 들고)
★감쪽같다:
꾸미거나 고친 것이 전혀 알아챌 수 없을 정도로 티가 나지 아니하다.
★kancukita(깐쮸끼따, 243p):
furnished with armour(갑옷을 입은),
covered with(덮힌, 감추어진)
●가닥:
실에서 로프를 만드는 중간 과정의 낱낱의 줄.
●깔딱고개:
숨이 깔딱거릴 정도로 힘들게 오르는 고개.
●kataka(까따까, 243p:
a string(가닥), ridge of a hill(깔닥고개)
★껄떡이:
음식이나 재물 따위에 욕심을 내는 사람.
★kata~ra(까따~라,243p):
a libidinous man(육욕적인 사람),
lecher(호색한, 껄떡쇠)
●간절 : 매우 절실함
●kanth(깐트, 245p): to long for(간절)
★간지럼:간지러운 느낌
★kandura(깐두라, 246p): itching(간지럼)
★kandu~ti(깐두~띠, 246p):
itching(간지럼), sexual desire(간절함)
●가로다: 말하다’를 예스럽게 이르는 말.
●기리다: 칭찬하고 기억하다.
●ki~rt(끼~르뜨, 285p):
mention(가로다), praise(기리다)
★꾹: 여무지게 힘을 주어 누르거나 죄는 모양.
★kukk(꾹끄, 287p): seize(붙잡다)
●갓난 거:갓 태어난 것
●kunnaka(꾼나까, 289p):
a young animal just born( 갓 태어난 동물)
★굼뜨다:
동작, 진행 과정 따위가 답답할 만큼 매우 느리다.
★kuntha(꾼따, 289p): dull(굼뜨다)
●꾸부정:구부러져 있음
●kubja(꾸부자, 291p):
hump-backed(혹난 등의), crooked(구부러진)
★곰배: 팔이 꼬부라져 붙어 펴지 못하거나 팔뚝이 없는 사람
★kumpa(꿈빠, 292p):
crooked arm(굽은 팔, 곰배)
●골랐다: 선택했다.
●글렀다;나쁘다
●kulata(꿀라따,295p):
an adopted son(양자(養子)),bought son(산 아들),
an unchaste woman(행실 나쁜 여인)
★꼬꼬댁:
닭이 놀랐거나 알을 낳은 뒤에 우는 소리.
★kukkuta(꾹꾸따, 286p):
a wild cock(야생 닭), hen(암탉)
★갔다:가다의 과거형
★gata(가따,347p):
gone(갔다, ga(가다)의 과거형)
★걸터앉다:
어떤 물체에 온몸의 무게를 실어 걸치고 앉다.
★garta(갈따,349):
a high seat(높은 의자)
★갈보:
남자들에게 몸을 파는 여자를 속되게 이르는 말.
★garbha(갈바, 349):
womb(자궁), sleeping room(침실),
a woman's courses(월경)
★ga~(가~, 352):
go(가다), to fall to one's share(~꺼), singing(노래(歌))
★gu~rta(구~르따, 359)
approved(그렇다), agreeable(동의할 수 있는)
★gu~na(구~나)
voided as ordure(똥싸다, 끙아)
★gu~rda(구르다, 361)
leap after(뛰어오르다, (발을)구르다)
★gridh(그리드, 361)
to covet(그리다)
★govara(고바라, 367)
village(고을)
★grah(그렇, 371)
accept(받아들이다,그렇다), choose(고르다)
★glai(글라이, 374)
to feel dislike(혐오하는, 글렀어)
★gla~na(글라~나, 374)
feeling aversion(혐오감, 글렀네, 곤란햐)
★ghatt(같뜨, 375)
to reach(도착, 갔다)
★garma(갈마, 376)
여름, 땀, 가마솥
★garmasu~kta(갈마수~끄따,377)
cauldron-hymn(가마솥 노래)(※가마솥 같다?)
★ghinn(낀, 377)
grasp(붙잡다)(※윷놀이에서 '~낀'?)
★jigharti(지까르띠,378)
moisten(끼언다, 찌끄리다(전라도 방언))
★ghri(그ㅎ리, 379)
burn(태우다, 그을리다)
★ghrinita(그린니따, 379)
pitied(가련하다)
★ghra~na(그란나, 379)
smelled(냄새나는)※구린내.
★n'a(응어, 380)
desire for any sensual object(응(應)하다)
★cadati(짜다띠, 386)
ask or beg(구하다, 찾다)
★carc(짤찌, 390)
censure(비난하다)※짧지? 잘하지?
★caluka(짤루까, 391)
gallipot(작은 단지) ※잘룩하다
★ca~rita(짜~리따, 393)
set in motion(준비!, 차렷!)
[출처] 우리말과 음과 뜻이 통하는 산스크리트어 단어(1)|작성자 구시울
The claim that Korean is derived from Sanskrit is entirely false and shows a lack of understanding of linguistic history. Korean is a language isolate, meaning it has no known connection to any other language family. It developed independently within the Korean Peninsula and has unique phonetic, grammatical, and syntactic characteristics that distinguish it from other languages.
@@evoinception 당신은 한국어에 대한 지식이 너무 부족하군요. 말은 갑자기 하루아침에 만들어지는게 아니죠. 한국말과 산스크리트어에 같은 단어가 많은 이유를 설명해보세요.
참고로 그릇을 한국에서는 그륵 이라고도 발음 합니다. 영어에서는 CROCK 이라고 하죠 ? 발음이 같아요. 왜 그런줄 아세요 ? 영어도 산스크리트에 뿌리를 두고 있죠. 한국말도 마찬가지에요.
Korean is not equal to Sanskrit. If there is any language that has any connection to India it's Tamil
My coming book tell the real world history. I will release end of this year.
thank you
But there are many Chinese in South East Asia. So are we just seeing populations matching in recent people?
The Han Chinese are East Asians. The ethnic minorities in southern China are Southeast Asians (and mixed). There are about 100-200 million people. (Their identity is clearly marked)
The ancient Chinese = Han people.
The presence of Chinese populations in Southeast Asia is largely a result of historical migration patterns, particularly during the last few centuries. Chinese immigrants moved to Southeast Asia for trade, labor opportunities. These migrations have led to significant Chinese communities in countries like Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines ...
@@evoinception I think the products notice distant relations and then put the person as having ancestry when it just some of their relatives moved there not direct line from those people. Korea was participating during Vietnam war. Lots of soldier babies? I doubt the comfort women trafficked to the fronts had babies. But did they get to return? Could they pair up after all that was over? We know of Koreans that fled or were relocated to Japan, Russia, China didn’t get to return. Did the ones who ended up in Singapore get to return. I guess that is the concern. Are all these patterns from the last. 500 years?
No disrespect to your efforts in making the video, but I have a strong distrust of interpreting these kinds of researches within a modern notion. Because neither mtDNA nor haplogroups have any dating information on the samples from which era they are extracted, yet often a logical leap is made through DNA from primitive times when languages and nations didn't even exist to modern nations. If the genetic link to Korea is found in China's Yunnan province and Vietnam, which are on opposite sides of the continent, then there should also be genetic similarities in China, which lies halfway between them, but this is not the case.
I don't know the background to these genetical discoveries, but did you know that when the Lý Dynasty in Vietnam fell, the surviving royals and following people fled to Korea (Goryeo) to escape the purge? and did you know that during the 300 years of the Manchu people ruled over China -Qing Dynasty-, the Manchu people who have the highest genetic similarity to Koreans migrated across China including Yunnan province to manage local provinces? Such historical facts make more sense than random genetic studies.
Finally, remember that the giant country called China which stretches from Southeast Asia to Northeast Asia is the one thing that clutters these studies in the region. Europe has only half the population of China but it is widely accepted that there are many different ethnic groups, In contrast the Chinese nationalism propaganda is rampant that 93 per cent of China with a population of 1.5 billion is made up of a single ethnic group, the Han Chinese.
The idea that genetic similarities should be found in all regions between two distant populations isn't necessarily accurate. Human migration doesn't always follow a straightforward path, and various factors, such as environmental barriers, social structures, and historical events, can influence genetic distribution. The presence of genetic links between populations in Korea, Yunnan, and Vietnam could reflect ancient migration routes that bypassed or did not significantly affect central China. It's also possible that other genetic studies might find more subtle connections within China that were not the focus of this particular research.
Right. Austronesian vietnamese is NOT component in korean race at all. Boat people only like one ink drop in korean river
@8messaya Lol,Vietnamese came from China and r not Austoasians, look it up Wikipedia for Austoasian term . 😂
ㅋㅋ 나도 너 가르치기 힘들다...피곤해. 오스트로네시안이라는 용어를 만들어낸 세계 언어학자들이ㅠ존경스럽다. 이 용어가 이렇게 될 줄은 상상들 못하게 될 듯....너 거울 보고 한 번 스퀴드 게임 여주인공 새벽과 키, 두개골 형상을 니 모습 비교해 봐 그게 종분화라는 거란다 마커도 있어 종분화 증명할...speciation had started .... 이 글 공부 해 이해ㅎㅏ면 넌 으ㅏ학박사급(인터브리딩 가능 🫣딴지 걸지 말 것)학자들이 인종차별주의자 소리 듣기 싫어 그런 듯...
@@8messaya he'll no, u can't teach bs. Soab 🤣Lmao 🤣
명나라와 청나라를 구분하세요. 그들을 모두 중국인이라고 하면 유전자분석은 무의미 합니다. 명나라와 청나라는 종족이 다릅니다.
산해관를 국경으로 삼아야 합니다.. 그래서 오늘날 동북으로 일컬어지는 동북3성은 중국이 아닙니다. 중국 공산당은 청나라를 승계하지 않았습니다. 대만 또한 청나라를 승계하지 않았어요.
청나라 여진족을 발음할때 (Jurchen) 이라고 하죠. 한국의 조선 (CHOSEN)과 Jurchen 은 같은 발음 입니다. 청나라 또한 신라,발해와 같은 혈연 입니다.
What a wonderful video !
Congratulation now we know why Koreans are sooooo beautiful!
thanks for your kind words and support ...
Native korean is from altai sayan baikal lake?
While there are some genetic links between Koreans and ancient populations from Siberia, including regions near Lake Baikal, Koreans primarily trace their origins to the Korean Peninsula and surrounding areas.
EXCUSE ME??? You have put LATIN subtitle bur NOT Italian's ones?Are you jocking me???
i added the italian subs, you can check ...
I think the story is based on Japanese arguments.
What if Koreans inhabited from the Shandong peninsular up north before China was formed?
And the ancient Koreans scattered all over as western China pushed a part of ancient Koreans to the east, again, before China was formed?
Genetic studies and historical records suggest that Koreans have a complex ancestry that includes influences from various regions, including northern China and Siberia. However, the Korean Peninsula has been inhabited by distinct groups with their own unique cultures for thousands of years.
There was no recorded history that korea is much older than CHINA with its 5,000years old history. Pure distortion.
@@limk8994 That's because a lot of Korea's historical and cultural artifacts, documents, etc. were either destroyed or confiscated during the Japanese occupation.
@@ICDeadPeeps that is not true, korea were once under the rule of China and its confucious idealism. It has a lot of influence in that country. And the Chinese word "Han" is widely used in korea. Like the Han river, Hanguel, Hanbok, hanok and so on. Even its language have Chinese wording, 'hakseng' 'chin ja" etc. In terms of history, korea was really unknown to the world at that time.
@@limk8994 I can see you were obviously educated under Chinese nationalist revisionist history where everything revolves around China. Yes, Korea borrowed certain words from China, hence "Hanja", but the Korean language has always been it's own separate language.
Also, how on earth would you know what survived out of the Japanese occupation of Korea!? Were you even born at around that time?! The arrogance and ignorance of you to make that statement.
The AI voice is funny - a basically British accents pronouncing "route" as "rowt" rather than "root", and the letter "z" as "zee" rather than "zed". It doesn't match up!
i know i am terrible at every thing i do ...
Everybody wants to be a Korean these days including Europe
The global interest in Korean culture, particularly through K-pop, Korean dramas, and cuisine, doesn't mean people are trying to "be" Korean.Be respectful to other people's opinion ...
@@evoinception그는 한국인 특유의 화장법 패션을 말하고 있는듯 합니다
it is conjectured that the population who originally existed on the Korean peninsula had
features in island-nation-type similar to Jomon people, or had facial traits close to those
of Southeast Asian descents.
later on, however, northern people living in the regions around Lake Baikal 贝加尔湖,
including Evenki tribe 鄂温克族, migrated south to the Korean peninsula, and drove
these indigenous people southward, or else, had interbred with them.
consequently, the peoples from northern area became the ethnic majority on the Korean
peninsula.
this is the reason why present-day Koreans are fairly different in appearance from
populations in their neighboring countries.
The idea that the original population of the Korean Peninsula had features similar to the Jomon people or Southeast Asians is not strongly supported by genetic evidence.
ua-cam.com/video/qBkAd-rbLsg/v-deo.htmlsi=Z4LHpR91WWS2l38W&t=694 여기에 한국말의 뿌리가 있다. 옥스포드 사전이다
So basically - if we were to apply the genetic situation of the population to the origins of the Korean language - it shows that their tongue is very much similar to a language like Albanian; insofar as that its vocabulary is an amalgam which has standardized to a common language, in affect; basically a macro-creole/pidgin. As per Korean grammar, that's another interesting detail, but since most of the populations shared many grammatical features as they shared contact and settled both physically as also in their speech around those features, but why Korean grammar is nearly a calque of Japanese in its structure is something of another conundrum; but I figure this is a far more recent development, especially when Korea was under the rule of imperial Japan. Really, all the isolate languages and language families of east and northeast Asia and Siberia is numerously complex.
The claim that the Korean language is akin to a "macro-creole/pidgin" and that its vocabulary is an amalgam standardized into a common language is not accurate. Korean is not a creole or pidgin language, it is a fully developed language with a long history, distinct grammar, and vocabulary rooted in its own linguistic tradition.