It turned out not to be so simple actually trying to understand how to express the second partial of u(r,s) with respect to x in general. Things just happened to be convenient in this case. Thanks for the motivation for figuring it out though. Your awesomeness as a function of time is truly concave up!!
The motivation is that you already know the solution. The real method is using the transfer function in the previous videos, or using separation of variables.
Explained way much better than my professor, unbelievably wonderful.
It turned out not to be so simple actually trying to understand how to express the second partial of u(r,s) with respect to x in general. Things just happened to be convenient in this case. Thanks for the motivation for figuring it out though. Your awesomeness as a function of time is truly concave up!!
That is what I want to find for two months. Thank you!!!
This was extremely helpful, thank you for the clear explanation!
How do you know which variables to switch it with? here we already knew that are solution is going to be a function of x+ct and x-ct.
Why can we apply Cleirauts theorem in this case?
Thank you so much!
What app do you use>
Hi, I was wondering what the motivation behind changing the coordinates from (x,y) to (r,s)?
The motivation is that you already know the solution. The real method is using the transfer function in the previous videos, or using separation of variables.
Thanks!
No problem!
Thanks a lot, really helpful.