malakhov is far better than nureyev i think- he is totally original in his movement quality, such an expressive dancer and such beautiful lines and jumps
In my mind, Malakhov and Maynard may be the only two counterparts to Sylvie Guillem. No other major artists seem to be able to match her artistry or talent.
I've seen every single one of those movements before. They seem to be put together in an entirely random way. Most mid-level contemporary dance teachers can do a piece like that. Anyway, why would you use a piece that is so complete and put a dance on top of it?!
Не понимаю Ростроповичу!, Но спасибо ему, он отказал!, И мир узнал гениального танцовщика!, А так , и сгнобили в «Большом террариуме» единомышленников!,
Nothing to say about Malakhov's ability but use a beautiful piece like this one of Mozart and put some steps here and there is not coreography. If you think to make appreciate a coreography using the magnitude of a dancer is not art but an exercise for the eyes to see.
I simply adore Vladimir Malakhov. He is a real one and only❤
I saw this piece years ago on TV and I didn't find our until now that it's Vladimir, he's phenomenal.
he's perfect ! I adore vladimir malakhov ! I really do ...
Талантище!!! Гений!!!
Sooooooooo beautiful!!!
malakhov is far better than nureyev i think- he is totally original in his movement quality, such an expressive dancer and such beautiful lines and jumps
VLADIMIR MALAKHOV I LOVE YOU!!!!
Translation in German is too loud so I couldn't hear what he was talking about in english. Great video anyway, thank you; amazing dancer
BRAVO !!!
yes we love you
fantastico
Tabi ni yande (Đau yếu giữa hành trình)Yume wa kareno wo (Chỉ còn mộng tôi phiêu lãng)Kake meguru (Trên những cánh đồng hoang)
In my mind, Malakhov and Maynard may be the only two counterparts to Sylvie Guillem. No other major artists seem to be able to match her artistry or talent.
1:00 David Bowie anyone?
haha yes i also thought he had similar looks artistry expression like Bowie
I've seen every single one of those movements before. They seem to be put together in an entirely random way. Most mid-level contemporary dance teachers can do a piece like that.
Anyway, why would you use a piece that is so complete and put a dance on top of it?!
Не понимаю Ростроповичу!, Но спасибо ему, он отказал!, И мир узнал гениального танцовщика!, А так , и сгнобили в «Большом террариуме» единомышленников!,
Не Растропович, а Григорович
Nothing to say about Malakhov's ability but use a beautiful piece like this one of Mozart and put some steps here and there is not coreography. If you think to make appreciate a coreography using the magnitude of a dancer is not art but an exercise for the eyes to see.