Un'enorme plauso ai crestezzanti. Un ringraziamento e una preghiera per il più genovese di tutti , l'eminentissimo cardinale Giuseppe Siri, uomo di fede,integro,risoluto e paterno , ha amato Dio, Maria Santissima, la Chiesa, e la sua Genova e ha consumato la sua vita per loro. Requiescat in pacem.
Grande Principe di Santa Romana Chiesa. Oggi 2 maggio anniversario del suo passaggio da questo mondo a Dio 1989-2020. Cuore di Padre, intelligenza acuta, Dottrina salda, carità senza infingimenti, cuore sacerdotale lontano dal carrierismo burocratico odierno, senso della Divina Presenza, zelante nel culto a Dio...” Non bonis Domine...” Questa è stata la sua vita e la sua memoria rimane in benedizione. Quanto ci manchi in questi tempi di confusine, di apostasia latente, di don Abbondi in porpora. Dal cielo intercedi per noi
Carissimo Cardinale Siri, dalle sue mani ho ricevuto l'ordinazione sacerdotale. Io pregho per Lei, pero credo che adesso viene Lei a preghare per me et per tutti quelli che hanno tanto ricevuto durante il suo episcopato a Genova.
Scusate la domanda: E tu credi che ci sia salvezza fuori della Chiesa e in più di un solo battesimo? oppure li rifiuta e li condanna come comanda la Santa Chiesa Cattolica.
@@Bre1958. La sua questione, molti la dicono,. Certo era insegnato cosi da molto tempo. La via ordinaria voluta da Christo, è quella del battesimo edegli altri sacramenti. Péro se uno viene a morire senza il battesimo ma che nel suo cuore lo desidera : puo essere salvato, l'amore di Dio è piu grande che i Santi Canali che sono i sacramenti. Pertanto, senza essere passato in chiesa, per ricevere il battesimo. Lo riceve per medio della Santa Chiesa. Perche, finalmente, Jesu è testa della Chiesa e noi i suoi membri. Il sangue di Christo non fu versato inutilamente. Solo Lui puo giudicare. Ma non motivo(si uno è credente), per scegliere come si o no come al ristorante ! Che Dio la Benedica. (Se mio I taliano non del tutto buono, che Lei perdoni, al povero francese che sono!)
papà è di portofino saluto tutti rapallini anche se non sono uomo di chiesa posso dire che mi ha commosso sentire il Card Siri altissima personalità parlare la nostra bella lingua un abbraccio a rapallo!!!!!!!!
Hey, hello!I agree with you, he was indeed Pope Gregory 17! Good to see other than me being aware of this fact! Listen, i am looking for people like you to share with, can i know who you are and get in touch with you?
Twice Card Siri received sufficient votes but refused to be acclaimed Pope. Or so the official story goes... There is an interview, in Italian, where Card. Siri himself explains why he _'refused'_ to be elected (if he did, actually, refuse *_before_* the Elevation to pontiff, rather than reconsider, after). I watched it when I was a child. It would be nice it it could be found.
@@m-hayek1985 Cardinal Siri (Pope Gregory XVII) did indeed accept the election, but he was forced to resign under duress. Some testimonies claim that if he officially assumed the office of the Papacy, the Communists (and the Freemasons) would have attacked the Vatican. Presumably with nuclear weapons or bombing. According to FBI Consultant Dr. Paul L. Williams in his book "The Vatican Exposed: Money, Murder, and the Mafia," he writes that "...French cardinals annulled the [1958] election, claiming that the election would cause widespread riots and the assassination of Bishops behind the Iron Curtain." And this happened again in the 1963 Conclave. This time, Cardinal Siri was put aside by "a little brutality" according to Fr. Malachi Martin in his book "The Keys of This Blood." Fr. Martin revealed in some interviews that the supposed reason why Cardinal Siri refused the elections in '58 and '63 was because he was in fear for his life and for the life of his family, as he and his family were threatened in the second conclave. A Mr. Paulo Scortesco, a cousin of the President of the Vatican's Swiss Noble Guard of the two conclaves, revealed in his letter "Introibo" that "there were communications with the outside," and that during the '63 Conclave, "[Cardinal Siri] only had one more vote than Montini.... It was then [during the recess following the second scrutiny] that Cardinal Tisserant went out to telephone, and when returned, Cardinals Lienart, Konig, D[ö]pfner and Taranc[ó]n [changed their ballots and then] voted for Paul VI." It should be noted that Cardinals Tisserant and Lienart were Freemasons or had affiliations with the Freemasons, Cardinals Döpfner and Konig were some of the first Archbishops elevated to the role of "cardinal" by John XXIII (who also had relations with the Freemasons, as well as the Communists) in 1958, and Tarancón was an Archbishop who was elevated cardinal by Paul VI in 1969. Scortesco writes that since these men had relations to the Freemasons, Paul VI was certainly elected by that sect.
@@m-hayek1985 Yes, he would have definitely preserved the majesty and the integrity of the Holy Roman Church. At least he did so in his heart. Cardinal Siri, pray for us.
Vincent Reyes you don’t know if cardinal Siri accepted. If he accepted, then cardinal Siri would have not been bound by the secret of the conclave. Unfortunately, he was not pope. May I ask where you go to mass? Pax!
@@m-hayek1985 Of course I don't know. I wasn't even alive back then. But I believe in the "thesis" because there is enough evidence out there that shows that Cardinal Siri was at least elected Pope. A response to your first comment: If he did not accept the Papal Office, why did Dr. Paul L. Williams mention that he chose the name "Gregory XVII" in the 1958 Conclave? Does a Cardinal not need to accept his election along with choosing his Pontifical Monicre? Dr. Williams said in his book "The Vatican Exposed: Money, Murder, and the Mafia" that Siri chose the name Gregory, but that his election was annulled by the French Cardinals (perhaps including Cardinal Tisserant) who claimed that many Bishops would have been massacred as a result to Siri's Papacy. And on the comment of the secret he was bound to, perhaps it was the secret of the conclave. Or perhaps it was a different secret? Here are paragraphs 7-10 of "The Pope: Could He Be Cardinal Siri?" from Msr. Louis Hubert Remy, who interviewed Cardinal Siri in 1985: "Some moments later, when we asked him whether he had been elected pope, his reaction was completely different. He started by remaining silent for a long time, then raised his eyes to heaven with a rictus of suffering and pain, joined his hands and said, weighing each word with gravity: “I am bound by the secret.” Then, after a long silence, heavy for us all, he said again: “I am bound by the secret. This secret is horrible. I would have books to write about the different conclaves. Very serious things have taken place. But I can say nothing.” Let’s think about it. If he had not been elected pope, he would have said so with as much promptness and firmness as he had replied to the preceding question. As he had been elected, he could not say so, as he was bound by the secret, and as he could not lie, he took refuge behind this secret. In fact, it appears that someone among my trustworthy friends who knows him very well has assured me that the Cardinal had told him that he had been elected pope twice: instead of *Paul VI and instead of *Wojtyla. The first time he had refused, the second time he had been obliged to refuse under the pressure of schism! We were three witnesses who have left very perturbed and practically convinced of his election." Why would the secret of the Conclave be horrible? All you have to do is keep the secrets of the conclave... well, secret. Save for an excommunication, there is nothing too serious about that. However, if the election was INVALID or had voided the rules of Conclave, than those inside the Sistine Chapel would not have been bound to the secret. Unless... perhaps (as some people speculate) that the participants of the conclave were put under pressure or duress not to disclose the mysterious events within a conclave. Not because it was lawful, but because it was not. I believe the latter is the truth. A Mr. Alden Hatch revealed in his book "A Man Named John" that Cardinal Roncalli, who was elected John XXIII, asked the participants of the conclave to stay another night "to caution them again against revealing the secret of his election to outsiders." That's just some of the evidence that has been presented so far that indicated Cardinal Siri was the True Pope. But many, including Siri himself, deny this either because there doesn't seem to be sufficient evidence to support this thesis (even though there is), or because something much more sinister lies behind the secret of the conclaves of the second half of the 20th Century in regards to Cardinal Siri. But your judgement is not wrong either, there is still a lot of holes and gaps in this thesis. As Msr. Remy said at the end of his letter, "...We leave to the historians and theologians the care to study this question thoroughly and to reply to it. We simply leave this grave witness." And finally, I'm part of a Novus Ordo family, but I personally either pray the Rosary and read the Propers of the Mass of the Day, or I tune into an SSPX Mass at Our Lady of Sorrows a few states away in Arizona. I know some Sedevacantists or Novus Ordo modernists will not like that as both think the SSPX is schismatic. But then again, most Sedes are modern-day Pharisees and a lot of NO parishoners are just ridiculous. So I don't take their judgements all too seriously. +AMDG+
Il cardinale Siri è una delle grandi cardinale della Chiesa cattolica. In nessun modo ha accettato il papa è santo, ha preso ancora essere fatto come simpatizzanti le orme di Cristo.
Ovviamente mi riferivo al commento dell'utente Hans Mabel, cui avevo risposto. Sotto il mio scritto, infatti, è specificato "in risposta a Hans Mabel". Quest'ultimo accennava alla diceria sedevacantista secondo la quale Siri sarebbe stato eletto papa con il nome di Gregorio XVII. Cambiando discorso, 3 anni fa vi chiesi se avete l'integrale dell'intervista al cardinal Siri, ma non ebbi alcuna risposta. Ripropongo la domanda: avete l'integrale dell'intervista? Se sì, la potete pubblicare? Grazie!
I assume that this was the only attire he had for this liturgical gathering, and people needed to identify the visiting Cardinal. It should be noted that Cardinal Siri had retired from his office as Archbishop of Genoa in 1987, and this video was recorded in 1988. Take this as you will, but the fact he's still wearing the Cardinal's attire and/or vestments after his "retirement" seems to indicate something that goes deeper than this documented video...
Un'enorme plauso ai crestezzanti.
Un ringraziamento e una preghiera per il più genovese di tutti , l'eminentissimo cardinale Giuseppe Siri, uomo di fede,integro,risoluto e paterno , ha amato Dio, Maria Santissima, la Chiesa, e la sua Genova e ha consumato la sua vita per loro.
Requiescat in pacem.
Grande Principe di Santa Romana Chiesa. Oggi 2 maggio anniversario del suo passaggio da questo mondo a Dio 1989-2020. Cuore di Padre, intelligenza acuta, Dottrina salda, carità senza infingimenti, cuore sacerdotale lontano dal carrierismo burocratico odierno, senso della Divina Presenza, zelante nel culto a Dio...” Non bonis Domine...” Questa è stata la sua vita e la sua memoria rimane in benedizione. Quanto ci manchi in questi tempi di confusine, di apostasia latente, di don Abbondi in porpora. Dal cielo intercedi per noi
Complotto o no, questo si che era un CARDINALE! Mica le mezze calzette di oggi.
Era g@y?
Grazie tante , abbiamo recuperato una delle pagine più belle della nostra Santa Maria che rischiava di andare perduta per sempre.
Il Cardinale più grande di Genova
La scelta di Papa Pacelli al successore.
Carissimo Cardinale Siri, dalle sue mani ho ricevuto l'ordinazione sacerdotale. Io pregho per Lei, pero credo che adesso viene Lei a preghare per me et per tutti quelli che hanno tanto ricevuto durante il suo episcopato a Genova.
Do you mind if I ask father. What year did he ordain you, and in the old rite or the new?
@@DT-cz2sl in the new rite
Father, what an incredible honor you have received! Please pray for us, Father, we need you. 🙏🙏
Scusate la domanda: E tu credi che ci sia salvezza fuori della Chiesa e in più di un solo battesimo? oppure li rifiuta e li condanna come comanda la Santa Chiesa Cattolica.
@@Bre1958. La sua questione, molti la dicono,. Certo era insegnato cosi da molto tempo. La via ordinaria voluta da Christo, è quella del battesimo edegli altri sacramenti. Péro se uno viene a morire senza il battesimo ma che nel suo cuore lo desidera : puo essere salvato, l'amore di Dio è piu grande che i Santi Canali che sono i sacramenti. Pertanto, senza essere passato in chiesa, per ricevere il battesimo.
Lo riceve per medio della Santa Chiesa.
Perche, finalmente, Jesu è testa della Chiesa e noi i suoi membri. Il sangue di Christo non fu versato inutilamente. Solo Lui puo giudicare.
Ma non motivo(si uno è credente), per scegliere come si o no come al ristorante !
Che Dio la Benedica. (Se mio I taliano non del tutto buono, che Lei perdoni, al povero francese che sono!)
Insieme al Cardinale Ottaviani e a Pio 12 può essere considerato uno dei più grandi difensori della Chiesa! Non lo dimenticherò mai!
Bellissimo! Grazie
papà è di portofino
saluto tutti rapallini
anche se non sono uomo
di chiesa posso dire che mi ha commosso
sentire il Card Siri altissima personalità
parlare la nostra bella lingua
un abbraccio a rapallo!!!!!!!!
Un grande vescovo...😇😇😇
E' un autentico gioiello storico. Merita Sentire l'intervista in genovese del cardinale Siri.
complimenti.
Meraviglioso! Grazie per averlo postato! Oggi sono 21 anni della nascita al Cielo dell'augusto Cardinale...eterna memoria!!
Almeno lui parlava zeneise e ci saremmo capiti. Primma agiuttemu i nostri, poi i atri, su se pö.
Questo video rappresenta il valore di una grande comunità come quella di Santa Maria!
Un bel premio di consolazione per chi sognava di essere Papa.
😂
Gli ultimi suoi anni furono i migliori e i più sinceri
God save the Cardinal !
Pray for us oh Holy father.
Un grande della storia siri Giuseppe
Thank you for this video. It is very encouraging to see The Pope in Red, Gregory XVII and hear the sound of his voice.
Hey, hello!I agree with you, he was indeed Pope Gregory 17! Good to see other than me being aware of this fact! Listen, i am looking for people like you to share with, can i know who you are and get in touch with you?
AH SHUT UP LUNATIC
Grandissimo Siri, peccato che non sia mai stato eletto Papa.
Twice Card Siri received sufficient votes but refused to be acclaimed Pope. Or so the official story goes...
There is an interview, in Italian, where Card. Siri himself explains why he _'refused'_ to be elected (if he did, actually, refuse *_before_* the Elevation to pontiff, rather than reconsider, after). I watched it when I was a child. It would be nice it it could be found.
Tommaso Leonetti di Santojanni if he accepted, he would have restored the old mass and the beauty of the Pre Vatican 2 times.
@@m-hayek1985 Cardinal Siri (Pope Gregory XVII) did indeed accept the election, but he was forced to resign under duress.
Some testimonies claim that if he officially assumed the office of the Papacy, the Communists (and the Freemasons) would have attacked the Vatican. Presumably with nuclear weapons or bombing.
According to FBI Consultant Dr. Paul L. Williams in his book "The Vatican Exposed: Money, Murder, and the Mafia," he writes that "...French cardinals annulled the [1958] election, claiming that the election would cause widespread riots and the assassination of Bishops behind the Iron Curtain."
And this happened again in the 1963 Conclave. This time, Cardinal Siri was put aside by "a little brutality" according to Fr. Malachi Martin in his book "The Keys of This Blood."
Fr. Martin revealed in some interviews that the supposed reason why Cardinal Siri refused the elections in '58 and '63 was because he was in fear for his life and for the life of his family, as he and his family were threatened in the second conclave.
A Mr. Paulo Scortesco, a cousin of the President of the Vatican's Swiss Noble Guard of the two conclaves, revealed in his letter "Introibo" that "there were communications with the outside," and that during the '63 Conclave, "[Cardinal Siri] only had one more vote than Montini.... It was then [during the recess following the second scrutiny] that Cardinal Tisserant went out to telephone, and when returned, Cardinals Lienart, Konig, D[ö]pfner and Taranc[ó]n [changed their ballots and then] voted for Paul VI." It should be noted that Cardinals Tisserant and Lienart were Freemasons or had affiliations with the Freemasons, Cardinals Döpfner and Konig were some of the first Archbishops elevated to the role of "cardinal" by John XXIII (who also had relations with the Freemasons, as well as the Communists) in 1958, and Tarancón was an Archbishop who was elevated cardinal by Paul VI in 1969. Scortesco writes that since these men had relations to the Freemasons, Paul VI was certainly elected by that sect.
@@m-hayek1985 Yes, he would have definitely preserved the majesty and the integrity of the Holy Roman Church. At least he did so in his heart. Cardinal Siri, pray for us.
Vincent Reyes you don’t know if cardinal Siri accepted. If he accepted, then cardinal Siri would have not been bound by the secret of the conclave. Unfortunately, he was not pope. May I ask where you go to mass? Pax!
@@m-hayek1985 Of course I don't know. I wasn't even alive back then. But I believe in the "thesis" because there is enough evidence out there that shows that Cardinal Siri was at least elected Pope.
A response to your first comment:
If he did not accept the Papal Office, why did Dr. Paul L. Williams mention that he chose the name "Gregory XVII" in the 1958 Conclave? Does a Cardinal not need to accept his election along with choosing his Pontifical Monicre?
Dr. Williams said in his book "The Vatican Exposed: Money, Murder, and the Mafia" that Siri chose the name Gregory, but that his election was annulled by the French Cardinals (perhaps including Cardinal Tisserant) who claimed that many Bishops would have been massacred as a result to Siri's Papacy.
And on the comment of the secret he was bound to, perhaps it was the secret of the conclave. Or perhaps it was a different secret?
Here are paragraphs 7-10 of "The Pope: Could He Be Cardinal Siri?" from Msr. Louis Hubert Remy, who interviewed Cardinal Siri in 1985:
"Some moments later, when we asked him whether he had been elected pope, his reaction was completely different. He started by remaining silent for a long time, then raised his eyes to heaven with a rictus of suffering and pain, joined his hands and said, weighing each word with gravity: “I am bound by the secret.” Then, after a long silence, heavy for us all, he said again: “I am bound by the secret. This secret is horrible. I would have books to write about the different conclaves. Very serious things have taken place. But I can say nothing.”
Let’s think about it. If he had not been elected pope, he would have said so with as much promptness and firmness as he had replied to the preceding question. As he had been elected, he could not say so, as he was bound by the secret, and as he could not lie, he took refuge behind this secret.
In fact, it appears that someone among my trustworthy friends who knows him very well has assured me that the Cardinal had told him that he had been elected pope twice: instead of *Paul VI and instead of *Wojtyla. The first time he had refused, the second time he had been obliged to refuse under the pressure of schism!
We were three witnesses who have left very perturbed and practically convinced of his election."
Why would the secret of the Conclave be horrible? All you have to do is keep the secrets of the conclave... well, secret. Save for an excommunication, there is nothing too serious about that. However, if the election was INVALID or had voided the rules of Conclave, than those inside the Sistine Chapel would not have been bound to the secret. Unless... perhaps (as some people speculate) that the participants of the conclave were put under pressure or duress not to disclose the mysterious events within a conclave. Not because it was lawful, but because it was not. I believe the latter is the truth.
A Mr. Alden Hatch revealed in his book "A Man Named John" that Cardinal Roncalli, who was elected John XXIII, asked the participants of the conclave to stay another night "to caution them again against revealing the secret of his election to outsiders."
That's just some of the evidence that has been presented so far that indicated Cardinal Siri was the True Pope. But many, including Siri himself, deny this either because there doesn't seem to be sufficient evidence to support this thesis (even though there is), or because something much more sinister lies behind the secret of the conclaves of the second half of the 20th Century in regards to Cardinal Siri. But your judgement is not wrong either, there is still a lot of holes and gaps in this thesis. As Msr. Remy said at the end of his letter, "...We leave to the historians and theologians the care to study this question thoroughly and to reply to it. We simply leave this grave witness."
And finally, I'm part of a Novus Ordo family, but I personally either pray the Rosary and read the Propers of the Mass of the Day, or I tune into an SSPX Mass at Our Lady of Sorrows a few states away in Arizona. I know some Sedevacantists or Novus Ordo modernists will not like that as both think the SSPX is schismatic. But then again, most Sedes are modern-day Pharisees and a lot of NO parishoners are just ridiculous. So I don't take their judgements all too seriously.
+AMDG+
Sarebbe stato un Papa forte e il suo Pontificato avrebbe portato una sana nuova primavera nella Chiesa
se avesse accettato il papa è il santo che è stato uno dei più lungo servito la chiesa cattolica.
VIVA SIRI DOVEVA ESSERE FATTO PAPA
Il cardinale Siri è una delle grandi cardinale della Chiesa cattolica. In nessun modo ha accettato il papa è santo, ha preso ancora essere fatto come simpatizzanti le orme di Cristo.
SLÁVA ISUSU CHRISTU!
😳😳🙏
Ovviamente mi riferivo al commento dell'utente Hans Mabel, cui avevo risposto. Sotto il mio scritto, infatti, è specificato "in risposta a Hans Mabel". Quest'ultimo accennava alla diceria sedevacantista secondo la quale Siri sarebbe stato eletto papa con il nome di Gregorio XVII. Cambiando discorso, 3 anni fa vi chiesi se avete l'integrale dell'intervista al cardinal Siri, ma non ebbi alcuna risposta. Ripropongo la domanda: avete l'integrale dell'intervista? Se sì, la potete pubblicare? Grazie!
Nel anno 1988 Il Cardinale Siri non era piu arcivescovo di Genova. Doveva morire a maggio 89
Gregorio 17
Our last and true Pope,
Don Noziglia parroco di S.Maria del Campo
Del campo ?
@@enrico_semeraroalberobello1522 si è una frazione di Rapallo
@@enrico_semeraroalberobello1522 abiti dove ci sono i trulli ?
@@lucarossi2087 si
Why is he wearing the Choir Dress for a helicopter ride?
I assume that this was the only attire he had for this liturgical gathering, and people needed to identify the visiting Cardinal. It should be noted that Cardinal Siri had retired from his office as Archbishop of Genoa in 1987, and this video was recorded in 1988. Take this as you will, but the fact he's still wearing the Cardinal's attire and/or vestments after his "retirement" seems to indicate something that goes deeper than this documented video...
He had a particular penchant for vesting in cardinalatial garb, and basking in cardinalatial adulation.
qual è il titolo di questa canzone?
HOLY FATHER GREGORY XVII.
VICARIUS CHRISTI
Le vrai pape. Et non pas l'usurpateur Roncalli.
Pope Gregory XVII , get use to it.
Gregório XXIII
Ma basta con sta fesseria.