Snapdragon released some laptops arm cpus not too long ago, and the gaming performance was shit, and pc hardware as a whole takes a VERY long time to make, so i wouldn't be surprised if nvidia slowed down the making of their costumers cpus, or even just stopped the making of them directly
also they've already made CPUs before, the Tegra SoC line, a custom one of those made it into the Switch, but it was mostly used in phones and TV boxes
It does give me hope though, if Nvidia makes ARM CPUs, it’s only a matter of time until every developer starts supporting ARM. Imagine a gaming laptop with just a CPU that can have crazy battery life AND play games on high settings? The possibilities are legitimately endless.
motherboard: Nvidia edge ti 7060 RAM: quantum memory Ti Power supply : Nvidia green Ti 80 plus platinum 10000w Storage: green memory 100T Graphics card : Nvidia 9090 Ti 5000w *needed* CPU: NVIDIA Unveils Next-Generation GH200 Grace Hopper Superchip case: Nvidia green super Ti runner *fans not included*
ARM cpus cant be upgraded to my knowledge. All the stuff you expect. Ram, GPU, and whathave you are built into the CPU itsself, and therefore you have to buy a whole new CPU to improve your performance over all. Arm is dead in the water if this is the case
@thechristfollower1723 Depends on the price and performance. Knowing Nvidia, they'll have 8 different chips with only the top end, expensive ones being worth it in a long-term scenario.
@@thechristfollower1723thats what we call an SoC(system on chip). the manufacture of whatever arm processor can decide to use the SoC form factor or not. you should be able to use so/dimm slots with an arm processor if it supports it. the gpu is usually always inside the cpu. however, the arm cpu can also support pcie cards the software would just need to recognize it. integrated graphics cpus from both intel and amd have gpus inside them as well as supporting external gpus. all in all a arm cpu should be able to be used with external parts.
Well, they also can't build X86 processors, Intel holds the patent on that, AMD actually holds the patent for X64, both AMD and intel share it with each other though.
@@cam5816 more in the sense that apps would need to have their own build just for Nvidia CPUs. ARM chips use different instruction sets. So it’s either compatibility layer or every app would need its own build for Nvidia chips.
@@bigbuba5212 Linux is on the rise and Nvidia will always fall short in that aspect. That being said they will probably suck at this whole CPU thing (especially without X86) just like Intel will always suck at GPU's compared to AMD and Nvidia If ANYONE is going to have monopoly it will be AMD with the tools to compete with EITHER of these companies and win on one front if not two at any given time with both competitors With gaming, Linux, driver support, compatibility, and the Steam Deck putting wind in AMD's sails (sales?) on top of all this, there is no world where either other company wins. The best chance Intel has is to triple down on their GPU's and really try to compete with AMD by Q3 2025. This would mean improving drivers, support, and compatibility too. The ONLY chance Nvidia has with these CPU's (or their GPU's in the next decade more or less) is if Window/Microsoft get their shit together (which they won't and haven't for years) or they partner up with a console manufacturer or some shit.
Was about to say Windows doesn't natively support ARM, but if they plan to account for that, then we'll see. Wouldn't be surprised if we see 2 versions of windows 12 one for x86 and one for ARM
@@hmelihonay if nvidia wanted to use a socket for their cpus? They could. There's nothing about arm specifically which prevents that... so to say no ability to upgrade between chips? It's purely a decision of nvidia's designing it.
People do that already with all white and all black builds, it'd be nice to see a little more color variety in computer parts, trying to build a blue PC with white accents inside a montech sky two case (blue), on a B550 tomahawk..... Do you know how fucking hard it is to find shit in blue, I'll give you a hint I've found ONE GPU in anything close to blue and it's not the same shade as the case, and I've found some PSU cables that work.... But NOTHING ELSE but with a few compromises on color scheme (GPU and case fans as an accent instead of following the main color) and a shit ton of RGB and ARGB parts and i feel like it'll look COLD AF (pun intended as I'm calling it frostbyte 1)
@@thecodeking91 we still need WAAAAAY more color variety like if I could get my Corsair AIO in blue it'd set the whole build off, but I can't it only comes in white or black if I could get a motherboard with blue face plates instead of white, or hell even if my SSD could be blue it'd just make the build that much more aesthetic, but as it stands all i could find in blue was a case and some PSU cables that's checking Amazon, Newegg, and even corsairs website, if I can find something in blue like the GPU it never matches the same shade of blue as the case, and just from the reviews I've seen im already in love with the sky two and I'm committed to that case at this point.
The fact that these are ARM as well has me predicting that we may have Nvidia handheld gaming PCs coming in the near future. If it is ARM based, more efficidnt, and has iGPU capabilities or even super low profile / low profile GPU hardware to go along with it then this could be a huge game changer for PC handhelds. I can only hope so, though idk as Nvidia & affordable generally arent in the same sentence.
This reminds me of 3 past products: 1. The nForce chipsets for PC motherboards. Popular for a few years . 2. The Tetra series of ARM CPUs for phones and tablets . Discontinued and tools removed from download . 3. MS Surface laptops running Windows RT .
@EveryGameGuru Listing every Arm device with a hint of nVidia participation wasn't my point . Point was that nVidia and Microsoft made such products before, emphasizing some of the oldest successful products . The Nintendo Switch is a much more recent product, it wasn't the first ARM based Nintendo console or the first console with nVidia graphics . It's neither a PC nor a general device .
@@FrigidARC I got a a750 in like march and it has seen no actual improvement. yeah it's "just drivers" but if it was as easy as you say it would be fixed by now. plus AMD can give same if not better price to performance with much less issues.
Yeah… about that… have you seen what a precarious state windows on arm is in? For now there’s not much fast nor efficient about it. Arm is coming but not as quickly or as smoothly as you think. There’s a lot of complexities that can lead to issues when porting to ARM.
Give it some time and we’ll be able to see comparable performance to Apple’s M-series chips 👀 I don’t think Windows on ARM is gonna take off right now, but give it some more time, and have developers port over their apps to run on ARM, and we might see actual competition brewing soon. I wonder if MS is gonna improve their x86 compatibility layer…
@@Frankaccino Since a main reason people stick with Windows is the game compatibility and changing into an Arm system basically negates that it could be a great chance for Linux to become strong with ARM CPU's but unfortunately the Linux community are so up their you know what that they will lose the opportunity.
I seriously doubt gaming will ever shift to ARM based CPUs. People would lose access to the majority of existing games unless developers bother to re-compile and re-release their entire existing library for ARM. This doesn’t just apply to games either, this applies to ALL SOFTWARE. Windows doesn’t even currently support ARM CPUs. Unless Microsoft does something to force the switch to ARM (like make Windows 12 ARM exclusive), x86 will likely remain the dominant CPU architecture for home computers for the foreseeable future.
Windows for Arm exists, and Linux Runs fine, too And there Are Chips that translate x86 instructions top Arm, so that x86 Software can ne Run with little Performance Impact. A Steam Deck 2 or 3 running on Arm would be feasible, maybe with great battery life. Could be a Game changer, again...
@@matthiasbendewald1803 Lmao imagine a Steam Deck 2 with not only an OS compatibility layer but a hardware compatibility layer on top of that, performance will suffer.
@@melancholyentertainment Well maybe, but only the CPU Part which is Not that Important for gaming, and also only to a small extend. Look at Apples m Chips, they destroy the competition when it comes to battery life - and are really fast enough for any Game even with some Overhead. X86 ist Not dead,Not even Close, but competition is always good
@@account-now-closed First google link gives you a review on how windows is just not at all ready for ARM CPUs. "Exceptional hardware is still marred by incompatibilities". Whatever it is, you can call it windows, but it's not good. Nvidia is either praying or sucking on some microsoft sausage right now.
Way to kill their gpu dominance. People always forget that not only is NVIDIA coming in as a newbie to the client cpu market but that they’re at a significant disadvantage due to having to use ARM which means they are reliant on devs to port their software to ARM to be able to compete in anyway in terms of performance. As long as x86 stays the dominant architecture, which will be for quite some time, they’re always trying to make up ground lost on x86 emulation and also just lacking software that will often be released later. Not to mention room that drivers probably will require some specific optimisations for both x86 and arm… it will be a steep uphill battle. Though with AMD also looking into ARM chips all I said might be null and void in a couple years.
@@soacespacestation8556 it has nothing to do with it being an ARM chip. It's because it's an SoC. System on a Chip, which means all the core parts, like CPU, GPU and ram are packaged together, rather than being spread out on the logic board. That's it. It has nothing to do with ARM, x86 or even RISC-V.
@@roccociccone597 As long as they make the big enthusiast GPU (xx90, titan) they can do anything they want, sadly. Ig at least the AMD vs Nvidia gap isn't as big of a deal for me on Linux, I'm going AMD for my next huge build.
@user-no6bt6uj2y yeah, that was until the new AMD RX 7900M Beat out the RTX 4090 by 9% in any benchmark or game that used Vulkan, which is every AAA title ever made.
@@kadddddshad1424well said. I‘ve used both nvidia and amd and never understood this nvidia superiority complex. Always loved my amd hardware and never had a non amd cpu. As for the GPU I‘m running a gtx 4070ti due to ai compatibility but I might switch to amd again in 2-3 generations. People who swap every generation are the dumbest people on the planet.
@@xXdnerstxleXx Yeah I agree. My first ever CPU was a Phenom II x6 1090T Black Edition, and ever since then I used AMD CPUs in almost all of my main rigs.
@@xXdnerstxleXxNVIDIA users complain about AMD's driver support, yet every single driver that NVIDIA releases has people complaining about various issues even on modern cards. They still haven't fixed the checkerboard artifacts on chrome after like what, six months? Hey, at least it gave me an incentive to switch to Firefox.
If you already have the 5600g and are just putting the card in it’s good pairing. But I wouldn’t do 5600g as a new build with a GPU. 5600/x is better pick as faster and pcie 4. Or 5500 if you want something slightly cheaper, it’s basically a 5600g without graphics.
Yeah, Windows for ARM has been around for a while. Apparently you can run it on Raspberry Pis and such. And there will be more companies jumping onto the ARM bandwagon, this will probably help keep prices low. I can also imagine Intel and AMD are working on answers to the Apple chips.
if it runs windows, it'll run Linux. Hell, linux is already on the nvidia supercomputer CPUs, why would it be any challenge to get it on the desktop variety?
Actually, I think this is great news, as it could bring the popularity and efficiency of ARM to Windows, and a little premium price will easily justify that (it still most probably won't be as pricey as GPUs...). And in the very least, it could at least bring more incentive to other CPU manufacturers to make gaming ARM based processors as well. With greediness of Nvidia aside, I really hope they succeed in this endeavour.
The thing about the move to Arm is that they will inevitably have to battle with the 40 YEARS of backwards comparability that x86 programs enjoy today. You can compile a Windows program from the 80s and with a few tweaks get it running natively on 10 (32bit.) The emulation needs to be great. Also
Im convinced nvidia will actually put you in the gaming environment in a few years the way we interact with each other will change again over the next few years
They need to make up their minds. They keep hinting that they want to move away from consumer facing hardware and at the same time they release a hundred variants of the 4000 series and are possibly moving into the consumer cpu space. I'm feeling whiplashed.
if nvidia joins the cpu market, we can have console wars but for PC through hardware. Green, Red, and Blue. 3 Signature colours for 6 different brands. Maybe companies just really like primary colours.
I can really see this working if they optimise them for gaming, especially if they do a good job while remaining cool to balance out the big GPUs we have. There's a fair number of high end Intel and AMD processors that are essentially overkill for gaming, if Nvidia can make a primarily gaming focused CPU that has everything you need but not what you don't, at the right price point, that could be a winning formula.
"the GX1900TI Starts at 1999"
Yep
Final price: 1 kidney
@@crapchannelbruh*for the actual gpu instead of an empty box the price will be 3 kidneys, 1 child and 2 souls.
Aaaaaaa
@@crapchannelbruh1kidny wont do.. donate both 🙄🤣🤣
Here we are, 10 months later, and I never heard about them again
yep, arm is not going anywhere if developers don't make arm versions of their programs, just like linux
@@redlionstudio2750 or improve x86 to arm translators (like prism) better like Rosseta for mac
Snapdragon released some laptops arm cpus not too long ago, and the gaming performance was shit, and pc hardware as a whole takes a VERY long time to make, so i wouldn't be surprised if nvidia slowed down the making of their costumers cpus, or even just stopped the making of them directly
exactly 😒
ARM is energy efficient, but its slower
thats why putting an ARM into a desktop is a bad idea
“This CPU will be very budget friendly, coming in at only $28,999.99!”
American inflation + nvidia = >100,000
Get your math right buddy
Edit: I apologize, 169,000 actually
"And that's for the very base model with 4 cores and 8GB of unified RAM"
I'm watching you mate
@@sihamhamda47more like 2 gigs lol
😂😂😂
“We are now introducing, the ZTX 8090TI cpu for budget gamers with the low cost of $7,999!”
Huge fan btw
Considering inflation vs time of launch of 8000 series, that actually seems like a very low price
I'm good 😂
Ok brome
Don't let monopoly happen
Intel: hey imma make gpus
Nvidia: And i took that personally...
Underrated comment
FR LOL
prolly right buddy, prolly right :'D
Real 😂
well they kinda already made gpus, since, you know... integrated graphics
Never thought I'd see the day where we have an Intel GPU and an Nvidia CPU
Alternate universe has merged
@@zenova9926 CERN has awoken us
The Opposite day
Imagine a pc with intel gpu and nvidia cpu💀
@@SQDYGMRSpongebob? 😂
this is green hell 💀
luigi haha
Nürburgring: Computer Edition
@@MnDogmanfax
Green is their main color cuz they like that money 🤑
@@MnDogmanthe cpu market fina turn into lauda
*That 1k price tag chilling down there to be revealed 👁️👄👁️*
Probably 1k per core
fax bro
Yea 1k for the lowest end one 😂
Bruv, I see you everywhere I go...
How?
@@RoarStaze tard bot 😂
For an extra $699.69, it'll have rgb on the box. there's an additional option for rgb on the cpu for a $99 housing fee. $29.95 afterwards per month
“And it’s gonna be expensive as sh!!” 😂😂😂
Apple: Our price is justified cause of quality
Nvidia: Ditto, what he said
AMD and Intel in the background, flabbergasted
They wanna be Apple so bad 😭
@@onionwarlock7407I mean both have monkey brain fans why not emphasize on it?
lol
Nvidia: our logo is better, we have an excuse to make it more expensive
Expensive as hell yes.
Shit
Not unless Intel and AMD step up their price-to-performance game
If ever that happens, then they can kick out NVIDIA out of the competition
@@piercecruz3629 i mean currently AMD has really good price to performance
i hope intel and amd dont increase prices
@@ejc101 not how competition works
Intel: we are making GPUs 😎
Nvidia: guess what's we cooking 😎
amd: we been had that
corsair: we have ram cases keyboards and mice
@@RoarStazemore of a reason not to subscribe to u
@@RoarStaze yip yap
@@RoarStazeno
My thermal paste. I'm guessing they are cooking my thermal paste. 😋
"I'd like to buy one Nvidia CPU"
"Ok, That will be one kidney, and one lung"
Three* kidney's and SEVEN* Lungs
also they've already made CPUs before, the Tegra SoC line, a custom one of those made it into the Switch, but it was mostly used in phones and TV boxes
"And It's gonna be expensive as sh-"
I mean, you're not wrong.
It's just Nvidia being Nvidia
@@LilSashaOfficial Yes
The weird thing is that people don't usually have to pay very much for excrement 😂
Why would he be?
Can't wait for them to brick your computer for daring to use an AMD gpu with your Nvidia cpu
Thankfully they legally can’t do that
@@2moist2meatyThey will do something similar in a tricky way. Like most features not working unless you use Nvidia CPU with your GPU etc. 😅
@@SIPEROTHyeah Apple already does that lol
They already do this to linux users @@2moist2meaty
@@2moist2meaty Then you haven't heard about nForce chipsets shenanigans. They didn't worked properly with ATI cards.
Nividia: Our budget friendly line of cpus will start at $25k
"the gxz2000TI starts at a kidney"
Nvidia use to make motherboard chipset back in the day.
gonna be fun finding games with arm support
Well there are. You just need to re-compile them and hope that they would work AT ALL. And if they work, you will regret doing it.
Im gonna need arm support, after paying an arm and a leg for their lowest spc cpu (that was one of the worst jokes in history, i admit it)
It does give me hope though, if Nvidia makes ARM CPUs, it’s only a matter of time until every developer starts supporting ARM. Imagine a gaming laptop with just a CPU that can have crazy battery life AND play games on high settings? The possibilities are legitimately endless.
I bet mobile games will run like lightning on it.
It was actually quite funny@@_SKY.FALLEN_
The 100% Nvidia set up will start at 79999999$
motherboard: Nvidia edge ti 7060
RAM: quantum memory Ti
Power supply : Nvidia green Ti 80 plus platinum 10000w
Storage: green memory 100T
Graphics card : Nvidia 9090 Ti 5000w *needed*
CPU: NVIDIA Unveils Next-Generation GH200 Grace Hopper Superchip
case: Nvidia green super Ti runner *fans not included*
When your Australian and need to remember to 1.5x numbers when it comes to money
Nvidia will sell an $3000 motherboard with a soldered ARM shit that can't be upgraded
ARM cpus cant be upgraded to my knowledge. All the stuff you expect. Ram, GPU, and whathave you are built into the CPU itsself, and therefore you have to buy a whole new CPU to improve your performance over all.
Arm is dead in the water if this is the case
@thechristfollower1723 Depends on the price and performance. Knowing Nvidia, they'll have 8 different chips with only the top end, expensive ones being worth it in a long-term scenario.
@@thechristfollower1723So basically that shit is integrated, if that is the case then i agree.
@@thechristfollower1723thats what we call an SoC(system on chip). the manufacture of whatever arm processor can decide to use the SoC form factor or not. you should be able to use so/dimm slots with an arm processor if it supports it. the gpu is usually always inside the cpu. however, the arm cpu can also support pcie cards the software would just need to recognize it. integrated graphics cpus from both intel and amd have gpus inside them as well as supporting external gpus. all in all a arm cpu should be able to be used with external parts.
@@thechristfollower1723 You mean like the hundreds of million of consoles sold every year :P
assuming arm gets worked out regarding compatibility, there are many arm chip makers, it is a very competitive market
Its 2050 and my pc has nvidia cpu, gpu, motherboard and powersupply
Dual core NVidia CPU gonna cost $500💀
Dumb comment
that’s pocket change in nvidia terms
@EveryGameGuru the Tegra X1 has 8 cores, and uses 4 of them
Well, they also can't build X86 processors, Intel holds the patent on that, AMD actually holds the patent for X64, both AMD and intel share it with each other though.
I fucking hate patent law and "intellectual property"
More competition is always good ✅
not always when brand loyalty is such a big thing nowadays, but at least it breaks up the intel and amd monopoly
@@medicfrombrazil_no, competition is always good, makes the other companies be pushed harder
u
@@medicfrombrazil_vc é br? Se sim que raro achar outro br no canal do zacky
@@medicfrombrazil_*duopoly
You had me at "and it's gonna be expensive as shi-"
Finally allowing us to use the mod renderers I wanted
Intel, AMD and NVIDIA. 3 Big competitors for CPUs and GPUs!!! What a time to be alive.
Apple should be taken into account as well for creators!
And yet Nvidia will still own 80% of the gpu market because people are shills
@@samoerai6807Nah bro there is nothing good about Apple lol
@@solarflea4115cant play old games with intel arc and AMD gpu are unstable at best. i hate Nvidia too
@@samoerai6807clown company, they’re only good for novices or fools.
It’s not that Nvidia is betting on some amazing ARM future for computing - they just can’t license x86.
It will cost an arm and a leg, literally, to have a Nvidia cpu and gpu combo
I guess you've already exchanged your kidney for Nvidia's top chipset motherboard
@@robertobokarev439 i'm not that stupid
Gotta get that ryzen 14900k with an rtx 7900 xtx
Intel: I cant believe youve done this 🎩
Ah yes, Arm64. Dependency hell, but in chip form.
What do you mean dependency?
@@cam5816 in the Linux context.
@@samabrams5297 Like your pc will basically be hard locked to the brand’s OS so people will have even less control over their own computers?
@@cam5816 more in the sense that apps would need to have their own build just for Nvidia CPUs. ARM chips use different instruction sets. So it’s either compatibility layer or every app would need its own build for Nvidia chips.
I can see the desktop hardware business becoming one hell of a monopoly
It's becoming more of a monopoly because more competitors are working on multiple components?
@@theencolony5595 Nvidia is gonna be the monopoly
@@bigbuba5212 Linux is on the rise and Nvidia will always fall short in that aspect. That being said they will probably suck at this whole CPU thing (especially without X86) just like Intel will always suck at GPU's compared to AMD and Nvidia
If ANYONE is going to have monopoly it will be AMD with the tools to compete with EITHER of these companies and win on one front if not two at any given time with both competitors
With gaming, Linux, driver support, compatibility, and the Steam Deck putting wind in AMD's sails (sales?) on top of all this, there is no world where either other company wins.
The best chance Intel has is to triple down on their GPU's and really try to compete with AMD by Q3 2025. This would mean improving drivers, support, and compatibility too.
The ONLY chance Nvidia has with these CPU's (or their GPU's in the next decade more or less) is if Window/Microsoft get their shit together (which they won't and haven't for years) or they partner up with a console manufacturer or some shit.
Microsoft already has a console though....?@Zladnyl
Ryzen and Intel will both still hold the crown in the CPU market👑
This sounds great. This would also help to bring over a lot of games to Macs due to the ARM architecture
Was about to say Windows doesn't natively support ARM, but if they plan to account for that, then we'll see. Wouldn't be surprised if we see 2 versions of windows 12 one for x86 and one for ARM
I actually have intel(12100f + a770) pc and it's doing very well.
NOOOO, No upgradability with those crappy ARM chips
intel for the longest while was basically no upgrade-ability due to 1 socket per generation... this would be the same idea.
arm is a microarchitecture not some socket name bro how it would correlate with upgradability
@@hmelihonay if nvidia wanted to use a socket for their cpus? They could. There's nothing about arm specifically which prevents that... so to say no ability to upgrade between chips? It's purely a decision of nvidia's designing it.
@@hmelihonay arm will not use a socket I know it
It will be soldered
Bro that cpu be lookin like a whole motherboard, it even got the ram slots on it
That shit bout to cost more than my kidney
The main concern I have with switching to ARM is lack of upgradability
Not having to pay thousands for budget cpu?
You forgot to mention that nvidia made the apu used in the Nintendo switch the Tegra X1
And that's why that kids' tablet was already obsolete and underpowered when it was launched.
Now everyone would be able to choose one color to go with for their entire build
People do that already with all white and all black builds, it'd be nice to see a little more color variety in computer parts, trying to build a blue PC with white accents inside a montech sky two case (blue), on a B550 tomahawk..... Do you know how fucking hard it is to find shit in blue, I'll give you a hint I've found ONE GPU in anything close to blue and it's not the same shade as the case, and I've found some PSU cables that work.... But NOTHING ELSE but with a few compromises on color scheme (GPU and case fans as an accent instead of following the main color) and a shit ton of RGB and ARGB parts and i feel like it'll look COLD AF (pun intended as I'm calling it frostbyte 1)
@@blumind_web2264I think they meant color as in company (IE team green is Nvidia, red is AMD, blue is Intel), not as in actual color
@@thecodeking91 we still need WAAAAAY more color variety like if I could get my Corsair AIO in blue it'd set the whole build off, but I can't it only comes in white or black if I could get a motherboard with blue face plates instead of white, or hell even if my SSD could be blue it'd just make the build that much more aesthetic, but as it stands all i could find in blue was a case and some PSU cables that's checking Amazon, Newegg, and even corsairs website, if I can find something in blue like the GPU it never matches the same shade of blue as the case, and just from the reviews I've seen im already in love with the sky two and I'm committed to that case at this point.
@@thecodeking91 yep that is correct but it's also nice to see more color creativity with the casing especially the liquid cooled builds too
Or take the unicorn puke route which I approve when chosing parts, not so much with RGB aesthetics
If it cannot perform well running my games under an x86-64 compatibility layer, that’s a hard no from me
@EveryGameGuru
Like Apple, Nintendo has very fine control over their stack. Also helps that the company chases gameplay over graphics.
The fact that these are ARM as well has me predicting that we may have Nvidia handheld gaming PCs coming in the near future. If it is ARM based, more efficidnt, and has iGPU capabilities or even super low profile / low profile GPU hardware to go along with it then this could be a huge game changer for PC handhelds. I can only hope so, though idk as Nvidia & affordable generally arent in the same sentence.
This reminds me of 3 past products:
1. The nForce chipsets for PC motherboards. Popular for a few years .
2. The Tetra series of ARM CPUs for phones and tablets . Discontinued and tools removed from download .
3. MS Surface laptops running Windows RT .
@EveryGameGuru Listing every Arm device with a hint of nVidia participation wasn't my point . Point was that nVidia and Microsoft made such products before, emphasizing some of the oldest successful products . The Nintendo Switch is a much more recent product, it wasn't the first ARM based Nintendo console or the first console with nVidia graphics . It's neither a PC nor a general device .
We have the full AMD PC
We recently got the full Intel PC
Now we got the full garbage PC 💀
bro intel arc is straight dog water
@@weebboi2039 everything is dog water in early days.
@@weebboi2039 yeah, but their new ones are gonna have great price to performance and most ARC issues are just drivers
@@FrigidARC I got a a750 in like march and it has seen no actual improvement. yeah it's "just drivers" but if it was as easy as you say it would be fixed by now. plus AMD can give same if not better price to performance with much less issues.
@@weebboi2039 Yeah I know bro AMD is the goat. Built dozens of PCs and love AMDs software the most
All amd, intel, and nvidia builds soon
“And we would make the price *Two kidneys* but we want you to keep living so it’s *only* one lung, eyeball, testicle and kidney!”
- Nvdia ceo
A pro gamer move, doesn't have to be YOUR kidney's ect ect ect.....
*future price*
Apple: finally a worthy opponent
Fun Fact: The owner of AMD is cousins of the owner of NVidia
The video editing and rendering on Windows is about to get so much more efficient and powerful.
Yeah… about that… have you seen what a precarious state windows on arm is in? For now there’s not much fast nor efficient about it. Arm is coming but not as quickly or as smoothly as you think. There’s a lot of complexities that can lead to issues when porting to ARM.
Give it some time and we’ll be able to see comparable performance to Apple’s M-series chips 👀
I don’t think Windows on ARM is gonna take off right now, but give it some more time, and have developers port over their apps to run on ARM, and we might see actual competition brewing soon. I wonder if MS is gonna improve their x86 compatibility layer…
LMFAO
someone has clearly never used windows arm
@@christianmino4073 right now it’s not good, when nvidia joins tho it’ll be good
@@Frankaccino Since a main reason people stick with Windows is the game compatibility and changing into an Arm system basically negates that it could be a great chance for Linux to become strong with ARM CPU's but unfortunately the Linux community are so up their you know what that they will lose the opportunity.
I seriously doubt gaming will ever shift to ARM based CPUs. People would lose access to the majority of existing games unless developers bother to re-compile and re-release their entire existing library for ARM. This doesn’t just apply to games either, this applies to ALL SOFTWARE.
Windows doesn’t even currently support ARM CPUs. Unless Microsoft does something to force the switch to ARM (like make Windows 12 ARM exclusive), x86 will likely remain the dominant CPU architecture for home computers for the foreseeable future.
Windows for Arm exists, and Linux Runs fine, too
And there Are Chips that translate x86 instructions top Arm, so that x86 Software can ne Run with little Performance Impact.
A Steam Deck 2 or 3 running on Arm would be feasible, maybe with great battery life. Could be a Game changer, again...
@@matthiasbendewald1803 Lmao imagine a Steam Deck 2 with not only an OS compatibility layer but a hardware compatibility layer on top of that, performance will suffer.
@@melancholyentertainment Well maybe, but only the CPU Part which is Not that Important for gaming, and also only to a small extend. Look at Apples m Chips, they destroy the competition when it comes to battery life - and are really fast enough for any Game even with some Overhead.
X86 ist Not dead,Not even Close, but competition is always good
"Windows doesn’t even currently support ARM CPUs".
What is the Microsoft SQ then?
@@account-now-closed First google link gives you a review on how windows is just not at all ready for ARM CPUs. "Exceptional hardware is still marred by incompatibilities". Whatever it is, you can call it windows, but it's not good. Nvidia is either praying or sucking on some microsoft sausage right now.
If they will do an apple move and make their gpu work only with their cpu it will be really bad
Way to kill their gpu dominance. People always forget that not only is NVIDIA coming in as a newbie to the client cpu market but that they’re at a significant disadvantage due to having to use ARM which means they are reliant on devs to port their software to ARM to be able to compete in anyway in terms of performance. As long as x86 stays the dominant architecture, which will be for quite some time, they’re always trying to make up ground lost on x86 emulation and also just lacking software that will often be released later. Not to mention room that drivers probably will require some specific optimisations for both x86 and arm… it will be a steep uphill battle. Though with AMD also looking into ARM chips all I said might be null and void in a couple years.
Well the GPU is specialized and soldered directly on the M series chips, just like the A Bionic or Snapdragon chips because they are based on ARN
@@soacespacestation8556 it has nothing to do with it being an ARM chip. It's because it's an SoC. System on a Chip, which means all the core parts, like CPU, GPU and ram are packaged together, rather than being spread out on the logic board. That's it. It has nothing to do with ARM, x86 or even RISC-V.
@@roccociccone597 As long as they make the big enthusiast GPU (xx90, titan) they can do anything they want, sadly. Ig at least the AMD vs Nvidia gap isn't as big of a deal for me on Linux, I'm going AMD for my next huge build.
I can see this being the future but the shift from x86 to ARM for programs is gonna be so dire
Sounds like a nightmare if we are judging by their GPU prices.
The New Nvidia Arm Bases Cpu starting 1 Arm
When they launch the CPUs we will finally have Full Nvidia, AMD and Intel PCs. If we can afford them of course.
Full Intel is not that bad; you can get solid CPU and GPU for less than an RTX 4070 Ti. ($305 for a 13600KF, $320 for an A770)
Full NVIDIA PC 😂 what are u planing to run Roblox or do u still have a spare kidney?
There is a 300 dollar rx 7800xt on Amazon rn
Nvidia: To use our latest dlss 69 buy our latest CPU and GPU
Can't wait for the LTT "All Nvidia PC" video
Hope its good, but I hope the price stays low. I'm doubtful.
Amd ryzen squad always 🙋🏽
Amen brother
@user-no6bt6uj2y yeah, that was until the new AMD RX 7900M Beat out the RTX 4090 by 9% in any benchmark or game that used Vulkan, which is every AAA title ever made.
@@kadddddshad1424well said. I‘ve used both nvidia and amd and never understood this nvidia superiority complex. Always loved my amd hardware and never had a non amd cpu. As for the GPU I‘m running a gtx 4070ti due to ai compatibility but I might switch to amd again in 2-3 generations. People who swap every generation are the dumbest people on the planet.
@@xXdnerstxleXx Yeah I agree. My first ever CPU was a Phenom II x6 1090T Black Edition, and ever since then I used AMD CPUs in almost all of my main rigs.
@@xXdnerstxleXxNVIDIA users complain about AMD's driver support, yet every single driver that NVIDIA releases has people complaining about various issues even on modern cards. They still haven't fixed the checkerboard artifacts on chrome after like what, six months? Hey, at least it gave me an incentive to switch to Firefox.
“Requires a 4080 or higher”
thank god the youtube algorithm recommends me this 10months later because nobody talked about this ever again
Intel making gpu
Nvidia making cpus
Wow
I ain't paying 3 grand for a cpu unless it's something like a threadripper pro.
ryzen 4070 still on top
Wasn’t interested until you verified it supports windows!! Could be something sweet
I feel like every time I click on this guy's shorts I gain 0,1 fps on my system
Basically we turned a pc into a console
7700xt with 5600g on 1440p good?
Thanks for the fast answers guys!!
yes however i would recommend switching 5600g to regular 5600 or 5600x (maybe even 5700x but thats if you have extra cash)
@@cobalt35I second this^, no point in getting the G if you already got a graphics card
If you already have the 5600g and are just putting the card in it’s good pairing. But I wouldn’t do 5600g as a new build with a GPU. 5600/x is better pick as faster and pcie 4. Or 5500 if you want something slightly cheaper, it’s basically a 5600g without graphics.
@@cobalt35 thank you so much!
@@DengueBurger I've had my the g version for like 4 months
Next: Your Nvidia GPU will work only with Nvidia CPU
that'd be fine ngl... as long as it's actually better than everyone else
They finally recreated my fever dreams
Yeah, Windows for ARM has been around for a while. Apparently you can run it on Raspberry Pis and such. And there will be more companies jumping onto the ARM bandwagon, this will probably help keep prices low. I can also imagine Intel and AMD are working on answers to the Apple chips.
rip linux users
if it runs windows, it'll run Linux. Hell, linux is already on the nvidia supercomputer CPUs, why would it be any challenge to get it on the desktop variety?
Android will run on that superCPU.
Fun Fact: AndroiD IS linux. But from the inside.
@@bhargavjitbhuyan9394android is Linux only theoretically, practically they are very different operating systems
Lol, Linux can run on ARM just fine. It will run better than Windows actually.
Family meetups gonna go crazy after the chips drop
I’ll stick to my console. Sold my 4090 build and went to the series x and it was the best decision I’ve ever made.
It can be nice for homelabs, if it'll be cheap
the ARM chip scene's becoming super powerful and sells for a lot. Ofc Nvidia's gonna get into it
Actually, I think this is great news, as it could bring the popularity and efficiency of ARM to Windows, and a little premium price will easily justify that (it still most probably won't be as pricey as GPUs...).
And in the very least, it could at least bring more incentive to other CPU manufacturers to make gaming ARM based processors as well. With greediness of Nvidia aside, I really hope they succeed in this endeavour.
these could be amazing for laptop cpu, arm has proven to be SUPER efficient when it comes apple cpus
I just hope they don’t rush the release of these cpus because arm is far from ready for desktops currently
The thing about the move to Arm is that they will inevitably have to battle with the 40 YEARS of backwards comparability that x86 programs enjoy today. You can compile a Windows program from the 80s and with a few tweaks get it running natively on 10 (32bit.) The emulation needs to be great. Also
Well, intel is making GPU’s and so is NVidia making CPU’s
The raspberry pi 4 can boot into windows and it uses an arm processer a fraction of the performance of whatever cpu nVidia releases
The main thing ARM platforms needed to succed was driver support for the NVIDIA and AMd, and now they are coming at least from NVIDIA.
Im convinced nvidia will actually put you in the gaming environment in a few years the way we interact with each other will change again over the next few years
They need to make up their minds. They keep hinting that they want to move away from consumer facing hardware and at the same time they release a hundred variants of the 4000 series and are possibly moving into the consumer cpu space. I'm feeling whiplashed.
Can't wait for the ryzen 4070 cpu
if nvidia joins the cpu market, we can have console wars but for PC through hardware.
Green, Red, and Blue. 3 Signature colours for 6 different brands.
Maybe companies just really like primary colours.
They will likely need to work with Valve and others to get good x86/x86-64 emulation going and get more native arm builds for Steam games.
More competition? HELL YEAH
Qualcomm finna hop on this real quick
I can really see this working if they optimise them for gaming, especially if they do a good job while remaining cool to balance out the big GPUs we have.
There's a fair number of high end Intel and AMD processors that are essentially overkill for gaming, if Nvidia can make a primarily gaming focused CPU that has everything you need but not what you don't, at the right price point, that could be a winning formula.
Introducing Nvidia GXTRZ 4099TI Super 10TB DDR5 RAM sticks for only 500 000$ (1unit)