📌 *Where is Everyone One In Mass Effect 4* 00:00 - Where is Everyone? 02:10 - Quarians & The Destruction Timeline (Pre Reaper War) 📌 *Synthesis Timeline* 08:20 - The Quarians Claim Rannoch (Biology & Politics) 10:52 - The Quarians lose Rannoch (The new Drell) 📌 *Destroy Timeline* 12:12 - Worst Ending For The Quarians? 12:51 - The Quarians Claim Rannoch (Survival At It's Best) 15:28 - The Quarians lose Rannoch (Not All is Lost - Revenge Grows) 📌 *Control Timeline* 17:04 - A Merge of Endings - Objectively The Worst Ending Depending 📌 *The Best Timeline* 18:19 - Best Position & Subjectivity(Rannoch Won) 18:55 - Best & Worst Position (Rannoch Lost) 19:27 - The Best Option
You made such a good presentation for all 6 endings for the quarrians this makes me want the next mass effect game to have a option to select major events for ME3 so we can explore all the possibilities for the choices in the last game
Thank you! There's a lot of possibilities especially with the Quarians, it was supposed to be a 5 min segment but the more I thought about the more it just came together lol. Again thank you for the compliment 😊
Great video. However, I always broker peace between the Geth and the Quarians, and I always Destroy the Reapers. The great thing about playing this game on PC is the ability for modders to make everything better. There is no way, logistically speaking, that the Rachni, Quarian, and Geth engineers working on the Crucible couldn't come up with a way to target JUST the Reapers in the blast. As a matter of opinion, TIM wants to control the Reapers, but he's indoctrinated because of the Reaper parts in his base, whether you destroyed the Collector base or gave it to Cerberus. The Starchild (who I despise) pushes you towards Synthesis. Why would I want to do anything that a representative of the Reapers wants me to do? I wouldn't. And due to the modders making the game better, I can skip his entire soliloquy and go straight to the Destroy ending. Admiral Hackett said it best, "Dead Reapers are how we win this."
Actually it is. You should replay the game and really listen to the star child. It’s heavily inferred the reapers leaked the catalyst to the species. So that eventually one species that is worthy could complete it. And change the reapers standing orders
I have talked to Starchild multiple times. Enough to know that Synthesis is what they really want. I'm not giving an entity that killed billions of organics what they want. I feel as if I don't have the right to make an entirely new species without input from anyone. Synthesis is me playing God. I am not God. I am a soldier that lost people during this fight and I feel as if it would be a travesty to give them what they want. I am going to continue to destroy them in the name of everyone who fought and died. When Cerberus murdered millions of refugees trying to "understand" the control aspect, I'm not doing that either. Destroying the Reapers is the only way to go as far as I'm concerned. That's the same reason I have never given the Collector Base to TIM. I always destroy it. I know he gets stuff from there anyway, but I'm not helping either him or the Reapers.
@@BklynGrl72 I suppose, I suppose I always look at it through the lense of their history. Because they are right, it wasn’t until the Shepard came along. That biologicals and machines could work together. In every previous cycle, an organic race created synthetic life. And then was wiped out by said synthetics. To be honest I don’t like synthesis because that just means the story is over. All are one and one is all.
@@phillipgrubb2443 in talking with Javik, our cycle is different because we aren't one empire like the Protheans were. We are many working together towards the same goal. Our differences are to be celebrated. In my game, I cure the genopage for the Krogans and give the Quarians back Rannoch with the Geth to help them. I bring people together in my game. I don't betray anyone. We can be different, but united. That's why destroy is always my ending. Even before I added mods to make it better, destroy was always my ending.
It really can’t be a 100 years in the future IF if they bring back the original shepard. Just wouldn’t make sense. Also it doesn’t make sense to say the Quarians were all killed seeing as how the majority of people make it so both the Geth and Quarians live together in peace. That’s what I did.
Its tricky to guess the timeline and to know if Shepard would be the protagonist in this game, 100 plus years seems like a safe bet given Liaras age ( maybe even 50 plus) As for both races coming together, I would actually agree, I think the best option would be the ending you suggested.. the other endings however make things somewhat complicated and interesting ( for better and for worse )
@@TayeTalks Well if they go with Shepard being in the fourth installment then the destroy ending with Shepard surviving could be the only canon ending seeing as how he dies in every other one. Therefor putting the game 100 years in the future wouldn’t make sense if they’re going to use the real shepard. Not to mention bringing back the old crew. Some of them would be dead simply by age at that point
For Shepard the destroy ending would make the most sense, but there's way to bring Shepard back without having to follow the destroy path ( we've brought back Shepard before ), I'm iffy on these other options because it'll need to be written well to make it make sense ( or make it work ). Timeline wise I think you can go a couple of hundred years in the future and still have Shepard, that could be cryostasis ( like they did with Master Chief, or bring him back like they did with Shepard in Mass Effect 2 ) I agree with you though, these are the best options.
@@TayeTalks I think fans would be immensely angry if they brought shepard back like that simply because Tali and Garrus would definitely be dead by that point due to age and that my friend would not fly well lol.
Fans will be angry either way because some ending and storylines will be canon lol, all you can do is appease most of them. Like you said Geth & Quarians will probably be on each other's good side which goes against what some people did. I think the main thing is because this is a 4th entry, it's understandable if the vast majority or all the previous characters don't appear in the game.
ima tell you yall right now, mass effect 4 will not take into account your choises on the ending, the destroy ending is the only one that shows shepard alive. that is the cannon one. thats why in the trailer teaser liara is searching . If they took the endings into accoutn all of them, we would need 3 seperate games in 1. Destroy means there are no syntetics, no ships, no weapons ( the catalyst explains this) control means theres a god shepard and reapers are flying around, also reaper tech. Syntheses means no one is organic nor synth, so there are no robots. every one is a mix. Quarians dont need suits as a example. So it would be 3 games in one, they will not do it
I actually agree with you, I believe they'll take one ending into account and that ending is more than likely going to be the *Destroy ending* Not because the creators are fans of that ending ( could also be the case ), but because it's the most liked ending and easiest ending to write for .
@@TayeTalksIt's pretty clear that they intended the Synthesis option to be the best ending. In the end, the majority of the fans talk though...especially since they said no to Andromeda as well!
![[FULL] RETROSPECTIVE : Final Fantasy Tactics](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RUBmYqs1jZ0/mqdefault.jpg)
📌 *Where is Everyone One In Mass Effect 4*
00:00 - Where is Everyone?
02:10 - Quarians & The Destruction Timeline (Pre Reaper War)
📌 *Synthesis Timeline*
08:20 - The Quarians Claim Rannoch (Biology & Politics)
10:52 - The Quarians lose Rannoch (The new Drell)
📌 *Destroy Timeline*
12:12 - Worst Ending For The Quarians?
12:51 - The Quarians Claim Rannoch (Survival At It's Best)
15:28 - The Quarians lose Rannoch (Not All is Lost - Revenge Grows)
📌 *Control Timeline*
17:04 - A Merge of Endings - Objectively The Worst Ending Depending
📌 *The Best Timeline*
18:19 - Best Position & Subjectivity(Rannoch Won)
18:55 - Best & Worst Position (Rannoch Lost)
19:27 - The Best Option
You made such a good presentation for all 6 endings for the quarrians this makes me want the next mass effect game to have a option to select major events for ME3 so we can explore all the possibilities for the choices in the last game
Thank you! There's a lot of possibilities especially with the Quarians, it was supposed to be a 5 min segment but the more I thought about the more it just came together lol.
Again thank you for the compliment 😊
I've asked some of these questions but I worry almost none or most won't be answered. #corporategreed
Same thing happened with Mass Effect 3. That's why we need another one!
Great video. However, I always broker peace between the Geth and the Quarians, and I always Destroy the Reapers. The great thing about playing this game on PC is the ability for modders to make everything better. There is no way, logistically speaking, that the Rachni, Quarian, and Geth engineers working on the Crucible couldn't come up with a way to target JUST the Reapers in the blast. As a matter of opinion, TIM wants to control the Reapers, but he's indoctrinated because of the Reaper parts in his base, whether you destroyed the Collector base or gave it to Cerberus. The Starchild (who I despise) pushes you towards Synthesis. Why would I want to do anything that a representative of the Reapers wants me to do? I wouldn't. And due to the modders making the game better, I can skip his entire soliloquy and go straight to the Destroy ending. Admiral Hackett said it best, "Dead Reapers are how we win this."
Actually it is. You should replay the game and really listen to the star child. It’s heavily inferred the reapers leaked the catalyst to the species. So that eventually one species that is worthy could complete it. And change the reapers standing orders
I have talked to Starchild multiple times. Enough to know that Synthesis is what they really want. I'm not giving an entity that killed billions of organics what they want. I feel as if I don't have the right to make an entirely new species without input from anyone. Synthesis is me playing God. I am not God. I am a soldier that lost people during this fight and I feel as if it would be a travesty to give them what they want. I am going to continue to destroy them in the name of everyone who fought and died. When Cerberus murdered millions of refugees trying to "understand" the control aspect, I'm not doing that either. Destroying the Reapers is the only way to go as far as I'm concerned. That's the same reason I have never given the Collector Base to TIM. I always destroy it. I know he gets stuff from there anyway, but I'm not helping either him or the Reapers.
@@BklynGrl72 I suppose, I suppose I always look at it through the lense of their history. Because they are right, it wasn’t until the Shepard came along. That biologicals and machines could work together. In every previous cycle, an organic race created synthetic life. And then was wiped out by said synthetics. To be honest I don’t like synthesis because that just means the story is over. All are one and one is all.
@@phillipgrubb2443 in talking with Javik, our cycle is different because we aren't one empire like the Protheans were. We are many working together towards the same goal. Our differences are to be celebrated. In my game, I cure the genopage for the Krogans and give the Quarians back Rannoch with the Geth to help them. I bring people together in my game. I don't betray anyone. We can be different, but united. That's why destroy is always my ending. Even before I added mods to make it better, destroy was always my ending.
@BklynGrl72 "I don't betray anyone." " That's why destroy was always my ending." That's quite a contrast if there ever was one!
Its been a while.
Good work on yhe vids.
Still high quality
Long time no see brother, hope you're doing good. Keep doing you man 💪🏾
It really can’t be a 100 years in the future IF if they bring back the original shepard. Just wouldn’t make sense. Also it doesn’t make sense to say the Quarians were all killed seeing as how the majority of people make it so both the Geth and Quarians live together in peace. That’s what I did.
Its tricky to guess the timeline and to know if Shepard would be the protagonist in this game, 100 plus years seems like a safe bet given Liaras age ( maybe even 50 plus)
As for both races coming together, I would actually agree, I think the best option would be the ending you suggested.. the other endings however make things somewhat complicated and interesting ( for better and for worse )
@@TayeTalks Well if they go with Shepard being in the fourth installment then the destroy ending with Shepard surviving could be the only canon ending seeing as how he dies in every other one. Therefor putting the game 100 years in the future wouldn’t make sense if they’re going to use the real shepard. Not to mention bringing back the old crew. Some of them would be dead simply by age at that point
For Shepard the destroy ending would make the most sense, but there's way to bring Shepard back without having to follow the destroy path ( we've brought back Shepard before ), I'm iffy on these other options because it'll need to be written well to make it make sense ( or make it work ).
Timeline wise I think you can go a couple of hundred years in the future and still have Shepard, that could be cryostasis ( like they did with Master Chief, or bring him back like they did with Shepard in Mass Effect 2 )
I agree with you though, these are the best options.
@@TayeTalks I think fans would be immensely angry if they brought shepard back like that simply because Tali and Garrus would definitely be dead by that point due to age and that my friend would not fly well lol.
Fans will be angry either way because some ending and storylines will be canon lol, all you can do is appease most of them.
Like you said Geth & Quarians will probably be on each other's good side which goes against what some people did.
I think the main thing is because this is a 4th entry, it's understandable if the vast majority or all the previous characters don't appear in the game.
Yay new mass effect video 🔥
Fantastic
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
ima tell you yall right now, mass effect 4 will not take into account your choises on the ending, the destroy ending is the only one that shows shepard alive. that is the cannon one. thats why in the trailer teaser liara is searching . If they took the endings into accoutn all of them, we would need 3 seperate games in 1. Destroy means there are no syntetics, no ships, no weapons ( the catalyst explains this) control means theres a god shepard and reapers are flying around, also reaper tech. Syntheses means no one is organic nor synth, so there are no robots. every one is a mix. Quarians dont need suits as a example. So it would be 3 games in one, they will not do it
I actually agree with you, I believe they'll take one ending into account and that ending is more than likely going to be the *Destroy ending*
Not because the creators are fans of that ending ( could also be the case ), but because it's the most liked ending and easiest ending to write for .
@@TayeTalksIt's pretty clear that they intended the Synthesis option to be the best ending. In the end, the majority of the fans talk though...especially since they said no to Andromeda as well!