if a air defense system from the kosovo war used in the 60s and 50s shot a f-16, and a f-117a nighthawk and damaged another f-117a(rumor has it the b-2 as well) 743 harm missiles were fired at the soviet 50s and 60s air defense systems. So 784 times 284000$=222656000 USD. A stinger(SAM)in service from 1981 to present costs 38,000 USD but since Russia is known for making cheaper shit and the air defense systems were around 50s to 60s and 815 shots were fired along with the some s75s and s125s being destroyed. all I got to say is I think the major embarrassment NATOs harm missiles used and the cost of 2 f-117a's with a f-16c is nothing compared to the costly lost of Kosovo. Theres a reason why NATO and US are avoiding Russia and using sanctions the same fucking countries that made the soviet union collapse by sanctions before stopping there trade. I hate to say this but NATO and the US truly fear this country when Vietnam had soviet tech equal made time as the US. The US had major debt and it was more of a lost. Russia is a different story from all the countries the U.S. has faced military. So don't underestimate the s-300 as well as the soon to come s-350 knight, s-400 and s-500. Threatening Russia with sanctions is a pussy thing to do and that's why I want my politicians to STFU and spare the embarrassment for the country I live in same for my parents country under NATO
Carl Johnson Did you that Serbia actually shot down hundreds of American bombers? They covering it up just like they are covering up tens of thousands of American deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The S-300 (and it's advanced variants such as the S-400 and 500) are so far ahead of American SAM Systems it isn't even funny. Even the the S-300 is a full generation more advanced that the latest Patriot system, and it is already being replaced. Remember, even the old 1960's era SA-3 missile was able to detect and shoot down the F-117 is Kosovo when it was state of the art and considered 'invisible'. An F-22 would be completely helpless against an S-400 or S-500 system.
Some comments as usual are downgrading this Russian Missiles because it looks so low on tech. The absence of touch screens in the control room confirms that. However the fact is NATO don't want Russia to sell the same missile to IRAN. I wonder what can be the reason, if it look so inefficient.
Russian missiles are extremely accurate and can hit a target even if its 10 cm big. They're more Destructive than US missiles,The US have missiles that are mostly focused on accuracy instead of destructive power Russian missiles do way more damage
David Burke prove it? look at 2008 war between hezbollah and israel israel left in defeat the hexbollah group had russian anti tank they detsory 20 israel tank and shot down israeli jets
Hazy Davey I don't like him either and didn't vote for him he has screwed up so many things, and many things he has done have been against his own people and hurting our economy. But I wish Putin had not invaded Crimea because it will cause more problems in the future between the U.S and Russia. I understand Putin is trying protect Russians in the Ukraine but the way he has gone about it is like the KGB which he was in it is totally obvious the the UN that Russian forces have invaded. He needs to be diplomatic and be concerned when weapons he gave the Russian separatist shoot down airliners filled with over 200 passengers. Obama is stupid and most Americans want him impeached but the Democrats are preventing it. We need Russian help to stop Islamic terrorist groups. If Putin would understand that and work with the U.S and its Allies to confront this threat that has overwhelmed Syria and now Iraq. I know this would not have happened in Iraq had they allowed the U.S to keep forces there. Our weak president and his foreign policies have not just hurt our economy but our Allies including Russia. I don't look at Russia as an enemy but the U.S doesn't want Russian weapons being sold to possible conflict zones that's why the U.S started developing stealth. By the late 80's the cold war was over but it never really ended as we have seen with Russians actions against Georgia and now the Ukraine. The only way U.S and Russia can coexist is to work together. I just hope Russia can elect a future leader that realizes that too. China is right at Russia's back door not the USA who would you be afraid of, the guy who is not wanting conflict or the guy at your back who is growing faster than you are think about it...
The problem is Russians build weapons to be 'effective', while in Ameirca our defense contractors build weapons to generate profits. Often useless 'features' are marketed as being very valuable.
Our's are more expensive and require more maintenance. However if you have the money and time to learn it you have a weapon that no other military can withstand the wrath of. We're not talking proxy wars here, if you think you can win a land war against the United States than you are sorely mistaken and in for a wild ride.
Thanks for clearing that up. I didn't know enough about Russian electronic equipment to say if they did or didn't use their own electronics for the S-300, but I had a feeling that they did.
I know this is a joke, but the US has had tech to bypass the S-300 system for well over several decades. Even the Israelis now have it as they were able to do the raid on Iran in 2018, effectively rendering Iran's major S-300 purchase useless.
is the first charge like a mortar charge to get the missile out of the tube before the main rocket goes off?...or is it a short blast rocket engine that falls away?
A U.S. Marine Corps aviator describes the S-300: "A complete game changer for all fourth-gen aircraft [like the F-15, F-16 and F/A-18]. That thing is a beast and you don't want to get near it."
Ah the obligatory comments from the yanks. The pilots of your billion dollar stealth fighter probably had the same cocky attitude when they got swated like a fly in Kosovo with a 30 year old Russian missile.
Dragan Korinovic His point was that the US won’t make the same mistake of having another stealth aircraft fly a predictable flight pattern, making it an easy kill shot.
patriot pac-1 is only 70 km with maximumum %70 acurracy. pac-2 has 160 km range. but S-300 has 150 km S-400 has 300 km. and russian missiles can be vertically lauched. bu patriots can not do it.( if missle attack or airstrike come from unexpected sides patriot loses response time.)
dont be so patriot .why there are many homeless and poor people live in world's richest country ? may be if every body had job and work no body would join to army to figt for coorporations interest to protect petro dollar system
not sure about now, but not too long ago NASA was using 8086, so 486's granddaddy. Why didn't they move to "better" modern CPU? - it doesn't need a heat sink and fan - it's been tested and tested and tested for many years by millions of people. You know it will not break when you need it to. As Einstein said, "keep it as simple as possible, but not simpler". If 8086 does the job, or 486 does the job, that's what you should use. Not some flashy new complicated thing.
The West will impose so many sanctions on Russia it will end up with trade embargoes everywhere, nobody will want to do business with Russia , Russia needs trade to survive, you will become an isolationist state, eventually the shelves will become empty and the Russian people will suffer, yes you have this great missile..so what! ... who cares ! , missiles don't feed your nation.
the way S300 works is that the rocket explodes in near proximity and turns the target into a colander. It works equally well on large and small objects as long as it's visible to the radar.
S-500 is still in development. This system is composed of several units. One of them is used as anti-aircraft weapon. The other - for ICBM interceptions. Yes, F-117 - is only stealth aircraft being shoot down. But this airplanes is not used in scale operations when air defence of enemy are stronger than nothing. And I repeat: S-125 is very old SAM. Weapon based on kinetic energy was developed many centuries ago. Bows, catapults and others.
That depends on several factors, including the missile itself. Since the latter is unmanned, it can be constructed perfectly capable of pulling many times the G's humanly possible for any pilot.
Eddie Hayes u are so dump , 20 years but having modernation stupid ass thats the proof that you dont know shit , do u know only the age of the F22 .??? lol if its 20 years old why ur pilots crap on there selfs when it comes to the russian defenses ? bye bye stupid u dont know shit lol
Don't forget,other countries also have this technology also.It's also bye bye to Russian,Chinese,and European jets.Russians don't have a monopoly on this.The US now has fully operational lasers.Don't forget,lasers travel at the speed of light.So,as awesome as these S-300 missiles may be.All can be knocked out within seconds if they were in range of a laser weapon.Russia also has laser weapons.Next generation laser weapons will make missiles and jets almost obsolete.
FRANK1FM russia now uses the S-400 and other upgrades as well as the S-300 itself. It remains the as the best long range air defence weapon ever devised. Until other superior systems are developed (be it lazer or missile) it remains the nightmare of any SEAD pilot. Also consider that to defend against this you would need at least 1 dedicated lazer carrier plane to defend against it in every squadron (very expensive). That is far in the future and by that time the S-300 would have already been replaced with far deadlier tech.
It can't fly for an hour without requiring in excess of thirty hours maintenance either .. lol .. with not even 200 produced and, of those, only 80 able to be kept at consistent 'peacetime' readiness, they're expensive show pieces totally impractical for any 'real' wartime environment .. lol.
For the record,The Polonium like any radioactive element,never disappears,Using the known half life and the present concentration.you can calculate the exact dosage around the time he died. Actually he did exhibited similar symptoms,that is why his items were tested after the Litvinenko case.The similarities were noted and Polonium poisoning is rarely seen to make a diagnosis
I am actually born in Russia and Russian by nationality. I have also been taught by my family to be polite and not to call people idiots. I have a Lithuanian friend. He is a pilot. Surprisingly (to you), he is forward thinking and doesn't blame the long-gone dictatorship and doesn't try to throw more shit on the fan. You should be less extreme in expressing your feelings of aggression my friend. Don't underestimate the world of mine, you don't know it. You aren't a god, it's that simple.
If its target is moving in a straight line, like another missile for example, than you're absolutely correct - this weapon system is extremely effective. However, if you're talking about an aircraft that can turn than that's a different story. The jet is protected by the laws of physics. It is difficult to change the trajectory of a missile which is simply a large object moving at a high violcity. This principle applies to all guided missile systems. regardless of politics.
Well Bilbo, F117A was shot down by S-125 Neva (NATO designation SA-3 Goa), and that system is from the 60's. So yeah, I'm pretty sure that S-300 can drop just about anything from the sky.
I think its about 350 to 400 km and 30 km for the altitude,for aircrafts,it's in general less for balistic missiles,I dont know why but may be cause of the high speed of those missiles.
These are the main medium-range air defense systems currently deployed in Russia, by the way. These are designed to enforce no-fly zones and would require strategic munitions to neutralise. It isn't as simple as to fly a SEAD sortie on them and be done with them.Also they require a search radar and a tracking radar, along with the command post and launchers,so aren't really designed to be used "on-the-go". The IAF knows better to steer clear of such a threat and will neutralize it by other means
Some facts, S300 and S400 are designed to take down enemy airplanes from distances up to 300km, including enemy AVA X plains. So that means before enemy has a chance to fire their AM-RAM missiles, which have a range up to 100 km. one battery of S300 can take down 8 enemy aircraft in some 8-10 min. and then move out of harms way.
I love the way the Russians depend on delivering common sense rather than complications. Look at their computer systems, the switches etc Easy to maintain, and gets the job done... No touch screens, fancy monitor's or flashy colours...
According to the Army, it's CEP is 250. But the only reason to have massive warheads is to compensate for lack of accuracy. Most warheads now are only 100 kt +/-.
Russians are the kings of the missiles.
ahmad ali Indeed.
ahmad ali They barely got their cruise missile done, so how are they king of missiles again?
US had cruise missiles like 25 years before russia even got their version of GPS done.
BJovke I thought russians used Glonass in their missiles.
BJovke I heard they fired S-300's all the way to Iran. No idea why, but i quess they missed by several hundred kilometers.
Such a curious sound.
CHA-CHUNK eeeeEEEE THOOM
Lol xd
Sir, you win the curious sound transcription award of the year
The rocket fuel is top of the line Russian distilled vodka
Don’t tell the Americans though
Show em who's boss
Russia makes best air defence misiles in the world ,thet is reality
Stefan Djurovic They will never be able to have as much planes as nato so they invest in missiles instead.
Shame on them, killers of mankind
@@fs2838 Missiles are the future. Its the only counter-measure to nuclear warheads.
we have s500 on Moskow defence already
Russian equipment is trash compared to American.
Bravo naši
?
Always an impressive piece of hardware. Thanks for sharing it.
if a air defense system from the kosovo war used in the 60s and 50s shot a f-16, and a f-117a nighthawk and damaged another f-117a(rumor has it the b-2 as well) 743 harm missiles were fired at the soviet 50s and 60s air defense systems. So 784 times 284000$=222656000 USD. A stinger(SAM)in service from 1981 to present costs 38,000 USD but since Russia is known for making cheaper shit and the air defense systems were around 50s to 60s and 815 shots were fired along with the some s75s and s125s being destroyed. all I got to say is I think the major embarrassment NATOs harm missiles used and the cost of 2 f-117a's with a f-16c is nothing compared to the costly lost of Kosovo. Theres a reason why NATO and US are avoiding Russia and using sanctions the same fucking countries that made the soviet union collapse by sanctions before stopping there trade. I hate to say this but NATO and the US truly fear this country when Vietnam had soviet tech equal made time as the US. The US had major debt and it was more of a lost. Russia is a different story from all the countries the U.S. has faced military. So don't underestimate the s-300 as well as the soon to come s-350 knight, s-400 and s-500. Threatening Russia with sanctions is a pussy thing to do and that's why I want my politicians to STFU and spare the embarrassment for the country I live in same for my parents country under NATO
***** I didnt know serbia was under sanctions for 6 years and there equipment didnt work that well as either. Thanks
NATO is pussy they bombed Serbia illegali , they built illegaly Kosovo as independent country , cmon NATO bomb Russia !
pauljackowacko552 That's why the US and Israel were shitting their pants over the possibility of Russia supplying Syria and Iran with S-300s.
Carl Johnson
Did you that Serbia actually shot down hundreds of American bombers? They covering it up just like they are covering up tens of thousands of American deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The S-300 (and it's advanced variants such as the S-400 and 500) are so far ahead of American SAM Systems it isn't even funny. Even the the S-300 is a full generation more advanced that the latest Patriot system, and it is already being replaced.
Remember, even the old 1960's era SA-3 missile was able to detect and shoot down the F-117 is Kosovo when it was state of the art and considered 'invisible'. An F-22 would be completely helpless against an S-400 or S-500 system.
1. The Serbians knew where the NATO aircraft were flying to and from.
2. The F117 had it's bomb bay doors open.
3. Of the 2 missiles fired, 1 missed.
fortitudo fuck yea ! Go Russia
fortitudo not until israelis destroys the s300 in syria. maybe you will delete this comment.
@@abuxxx3607 inly in ur dreams
Some comments as usual are downgrading this Russian Missiles because it looks so low on tech. The absence of touch screens in the control room confirms that. However the fact is NATO don't want Russia to sell the same missile to IRAN. I wonder what can be the reason, if it look so inefficient.
Russian missiles are extremely accurate and can hit a target even if its 10 cm big.
They're more Destructive than US missiles,The US have missiles that are mostly focused on accuracy instead of destructive power Russian missiles do way more damage
Zach Echo Prove it?
David Burke American propaganda and puppet media always do the opposite...that the proof.
David Burke
prove it? look at 2008 war between hezbollah and israel israel left in defeat the hexbollah group had russian anti tank they detsory 20 israel tank and shot down israeli jets
Hazy Davey I don't like him either and didn't vote for him he has screwed up so many things, and many things he has done have been against his own people and hurting our economy. But I wish Putin had not invaded Crimea because it will cause more problems in the future between the U.S and Russia. I understand Putin is trying protect Russians in the Ukraine but the way he has gone about it is like the KGB which he was in it is totally obvious the the UN that Russian forces have invaded. He needs to be diplomatic and be concerned when weapons he gave the Russian separatist shoot down airliners filled with over 200 passengers. Obama is stupid and most Americans want him impeached but the Democrats are preventing it. We need Russian help to stop Islamic terrorist groups. If Putin would understand that and work with the U.S and its Allies to confront this threat that has overwhelmed Syria and now Iraq. I know this would not have happened in Iraq had they allowed the U.S to keep forces there. Our weak president and his foreign policies have not just hurt our economy but our Allies including Russia. I don't look at Russia as an enemy but the U.S doesn't want Russian weapons being sold to possible conflict zones that's why the U.S started developing stealth. By the late 80's the cold war was over but it never really ended as we have seen with Russians actions against Georgia and now the Ukraine. The only way U.S and Russia can coexist is to work together. I just hope Russia can elect a future leader that realizes that too. China is right at Russia's back door not the USA who would you be afraid of, the guy who is not wanting conflict or the guy at your back who is growing faster than you are think about it...
Awesome videos. Thank you for posting!
The problem is Russians build weapons to be 'effective', while in Ameirca our defense contractors build weapons to generate profits. Often useless 'features' are marketed as being very valuable.
obsthetimes Lol...which country in which the only business is oil & arms?
And yet there's no plane that will out-fight an F-22 and the F-15 has over 100 air-to-air kills with no losses.
Our's are more expensive and require more maintenance. However if you have the money and time to learn it you have a weapon that no other military can withstand the wrath of. We're not talking proxy wars here, if you think you can win a land war against the United States than you are sorely mistaken and in for a wild ride.
amazing
Impresionante!!!!!.....
Thanks for clearing that up. I didn't know enough about Russian electronic equipment to say if they did or didn't use their own electronics for the S-300, but I had a feeling that they did.
One of the reasons why the US didn't attack Syria
ytpKANG lol
The US sent OV-10 Broncos to Syria lol.
I know this is a joke, but the US has had tech to bypass the S-300 system for well over several decades. Even the Israelis now have it as they were able to do the raid on Iran in 2018, effectively rendering Iran's major S-300 purchase useless.
really really amazing dominantly !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just donated to Serbia. Thx Russian BROTHERS!
Thanks, you're right!
is the first charge like a mortar charge to get the missile out of the tube before the main rocket goes off?...or is it a short blast rocket engine that falls away?
A U.S. Marine Corps aviator describes the S-300: "A complete game changer for all fourth-gen aircraft [like the F-15, F-16 and F/A-18]. That thing is a beast and you don't want to get near it."
+amazingdany meanwhile this guy +PunchingMegaTree is defending how an a10 can survive
The Russians took out the roswell aliens? o:
An U.S. Marine Corps aviator or a putinist troll, just like you?
Ah the obligatory comments from the yanks. The pilots of your billion dollar stealth fighter probably had the same cocky attitude when they got swated like a fly in Kosovo with a 30 year old Russian missile.
Thats the exact reason they got shot down, got cocky and flew the same flight path all the time. I doubt the US will make that mistake again
Hey nightrise,45 apply the second part of your comment to current US politics and you'll understand the doubts many of us have.
"I doubt the US will make that mistake again"
Taliban
al qaida
-stan
Iraq
lybia
syria
probably forgott a bunch as well.
Dragan Korinovic His point was that the US won’t make the same mistake of having another stealth aircraft fly a predictable flight pattern, making it an easy kill shot.
The aircraft was almost 20 year old when the missile was 30 so...
I love the way it jumps out of the launcher
Start der Raketen ist einfach klasse, abgesehen von der Wirkung der Raketen. Rakettenballet. Wunderful!
patriot pac-1 is only 70 km with maximumum %70 acurracy. pac-2 has 160 km range. but S-300 has 150 km S-400 has 300 km. and russian missiles can be vertically lauched. bu patriots can not do it.( if missle attack or airstrike come from unexpected sides patriot loses response time.)
dont be so patriot .why there are many homeless and poor people live in world's richest country ? may be if every body had job and work no body would join to army to figt for coorporations interest to protect petro dollar system
s400 has 400km not 300
we love russia from africa.
This thing is beastly.
Very nice dashboard!
Space shuttle runs on Intel 486.
not sure about now, but not too long ago NASA was using 8086, so 486's granddaddy. Why didn't they move to "better" modern CPU?
- it doesn't need a heat sink and fan
- it's been tested and tested and tested for many years by millions of people. You know it will not break when you need it to.
As Einstein said, "keep it as simple as possible, but not simpler".
If 8086 does the job, or 486 does the job, that's what you should use. Not some flashy new complicated thing.
Long live Russia
The West will impose so many sanctions on Russia it will end up with trade embargoes everywhere, nobody will want to do business with Russia , Russia needs trade to survive, you will become an isolationist state, eventually the shelves will become empty and the Russian people will suffer, yes you have this great missile..so what! ... who cares ! , missiles don't feed your nation.
ua-cam.com/video/QtuN8UuAWTg/v-deo.html
the way S300 works is that the rocket explodes in near proximity and turns the target into a colander. It works equally well on large and small objects as long as it's visible to the radar.
i like the sound this makes....
I love you Russia India and Russia are best friends they are not friends only brothers
One tip, don't mess with the russian lol
S-500 is still in development. This system is composed of several units. One of them is used as anti-aircraft weapon. The other - for ICBM interceptions.
Yes, F-117 - is only stealth aircraft being shoot down. But this airplanes is not used in scale operations when air defence of enemy are stronger than nothing. And I repeat: S-125 is very old SAM.
Weapon based on kinetic energy was developed many centuries ago. Bows, catapults and others.
That depends on several factors, including the missile itself. Since the latter is unmanned, it can be constructed perfectly capable of pulling many times the G's humanly possible for any pilot.
The largest air defense in the world in 1531 air defense battery 😲😲😲
Now we know that they're sitting ducks for Turkish drones.
where can i buy this firework set?
yes the basic technology of the radar system is old (70') but useful.
bye bye F20 LOL
Your an idiot.this is just a bunch of scrap metal thats 50 years old thrown together.
Eddie Hayes u are so dump , 20 years but having modernation stupid ass thats the proof that you dont know shit , do u know only the age of the F22 .??? lol if its 20 years old why ur pilots crap on there selfs when it comes to the russian defenses ? bye bye stupid u dont know shit lol
botchedonce americans smack the weakest hand in the world , im from algeria and im so glad that my countrie is a client of russia
Like I give a shit.I don't care where your from.
well wasnt talking to you , if u dont give a shit u wouldnt response ;)
BRAVO PUTINE ...ZIVELA RUSIJA
how beautiful
They sound so cool
Putin need vodka, they deliver within 300 miles! : )
Egypt buy 4 _S300vm
***** Don't be mad America whoops your fucking ass all the time. Loser.
The enemy accomplished
Perfect precision target
C.C.C.P ABSOLUTE POWER
Love from little greece
love the sound of that missile
Great video. Wake me when it's over.
Russia should give this to Serbia , their loyal orthodox friends
+Crusader Mick We dont have money for this power system.
+Crusader Mick Dobili smo maketu. Hvala braća Rusi!
+Zander25332533 Tesko onome koga Rusi brane!
TruePuffer Damn straight. :D
+Crusader Mick agree, but how do you know that Serbia is already armed with this system...
Russian Borthers! Serbia
we dont love serbia
Where can I buy one for home defense?
Do this system efficient against western super electronic warefare capacity????
sounds like a dinosaur XD
Hopefully these will be put to good use, Slovakia is providing them. Slava Ukraini
Likewise!!!
I wish we had this in the Phil.
Famous s 300 ....better then usa
bye bye F22 lloll
Don't forget,other countries also have this technology also.It's also bye bye to Russian,Chinese,and European jets.Russians don't have a monopoly on this.The US now has fully operational lasers.Don't forget,lasers travel at the speed of light.So,as awesome as these S-300 missiles may be.All can be knocked out within seconds if they were in range of a laser weapon.Russia also has laser weapons.Next generation laser weapons will make missiles and jets almost obsolete.
FRANK1FM russia now uses the S-400 and other upgrades as well as the S-300 itself. It remains the as the best long range air defence weapon ever devised. Until other superior systems are developed (be it lazer or missile) it remains the nightmare of any SEAD pilot. Also consider that to defend against this you would need at least 1 dedicated lazer carrier plane to defend against it in every squadron (very expensive). That is far in the future and by that time the S-300 would have already been replaced with far deadlier tech.
F-22 can't be detected by that nor the S-400 lol
It can't fly for an hour without requiring in excess of thirty hours maintenance either .. lol .. with not even 200 produced and, of those, only 80 able to be kept at consistent 'peacetime' readiness, they're expensive show pieces totally impractical for any 'real' wartime environment .. lol.
Christopher W. Hearne Your stealth planes have been shot down with a '60s russian sam systems. Enough said.
Nice !
Finally, a military tech video that doesn't have some awful music soundtrack
RUSSIA
It's impossible to win this country
Destroy the sun!!!!!!
Ya lo tenemos aquí en Venezuela!, thanks for selling them to us.
For the record,The Polonium like any radioactive element,never disappears,Using the known half life and the present concentration.you can calculate the exact dosage around the time he died.
Actually he did exhibited similar symptoms,that is why his items were tested after the Litvinenko case.The similarities were noted and Polonium poisoning is rarely seen to make a diagnosis
le début du lancement est trop exciting!!!!!!!!;")
Seria now got them as well
Do the missiles self destruct in these tests or something?
the biggest deterrent to war!
Is there any video of these missile systems actually intercepting a hostile missile or aircraft??..i can't find any
Because S-300 Not Battle Proven Yet
YES no one ever dared to miss with a country equiped with S300...
It show how effective they are and ennemies KNOW IT.
I am actually born in Russia and Russian by nationality. I have also been taught by my family to be polite and not to call people idiots. I have a Lithuanian friend. He is a pilot. Surprisingly (to you), he is forward thinking and doesn't blame the long-gone dictatorship and doesn't try to throw more shit on the fan. You should be less extreme in expressing your feelings of aggression my friend. Don't underestimate the world of mine, you don't know it. You aren't a god, it's that simple.
Amazing
old but DEADLY
LETS GO ASAD LETS GO
I agree with you.
this thing may look outdated but still effective
+Tanim Xubayer It has no counterparts
they look old, but that's what makes it more reliable against EMP (there were built for WW3).
They pack a mean punch.
Just great, the best :-)
If its target is moving in a straight line, like another missile for example, than you're absolutely correct - this weapon system is extremely effective.
However, if you're talking about an aircraft that can turn than that's a different story. The jet is protected by the laws of physics. It is difficult to change the trajectory of a missile which is simply a large object moving at a high violcity. This principle applies to all guided missile systems. regardless of politics.
In that way yes.. But people think its a surface to surface .. Its a defensive weapon also to counter missiles and target anything on its radar
Nice.
Well Bilbo, F117A was shot down by S-125 Neva (NATO designation SA-3 Goa), and that system is from the 60's. So yeah, I'm pretty sure that S-300 can drop just about anything from the sky.
I LOLed so hard on this one I fell from the chair
awesome awesome awesome!!!
The system is tested on civil aircraft ?
Yes you will, do some research about our Jericho missile series before looking at the world map.
I think its about 350 to 400 km and 30 km for the altitude,for aircrafts,it's in general less for balistic missiles,I dont know why but may be cause of the high speed of those missiles.
Красота!
Damn it fast
pa-paw-squeeeek-prrrrrrrrRRRRRRR
What a beautiful sound.
These are the main medium-range air defense systems currently deployed in Russia, by the way. These are designed to enforce no-fly zones and would require strategic munitions to neutralise. It isn't as simple as to fly a SEAD sortie on them and be done with them.Also they require a search radar and a tracking radar, along with the command post and launchers,so aren't really designed to be used "on-the-go". The IAF knows better to steer clear of such a threat and will neutralize it by other means
Some facts, S300 and S400 are designed to take down enemy airplanes from distances up to 300km, including enemy AVA X plains. So that means before enemy has a chance to fire their AM-RAM missiles, which have a range up to 100 km. one battery of S300 can take down 8 enemy aircraft in some 8-10 min. and then move out of harms way.
THE WORLD IS CRAZY
Well, apparently 64 onboard S-300s didn't prevent the Moskwa to be sunk.
I love the way the Russians depend on delivering common sense rather than complications. Look at their computer systems, the switches etc
Easy to maintain, and gets the job done...
No touch screens, fancy monitor's or flashy colours...
According to the Army, it's CEP is 250. But the only reason to have massive warheads is to compensate for lack of accuracy. Most warheads now are only 100 kt +/-.
What does Iskander mean?
The S-300 is already amazing. Wait 'till "Murica" sees the S-400!
The best
Best answer ever :D
Bien hecho/very good camaradas