Top 10 Amphibious Assault Ships In The World (2021)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 лип 2024
- Check out the Military playlist from the Buzz: • 10 Most Expensive Mili...
------------
Video description: The design of an amphibious assault ship evolved from aircraft carriers converted for use as helicopter carriers. The role of the amphibious assault ship is fundamentally different from that of a standard aircraft carrier: its aviation facilities have the primary role of hosting helicopters to support forces ashore rather than to support strike aircraft. This video presents the top 10 amphibious assault ships in the world. Our Top 10 analysis is based on the combined score of offensive capabilities, displacement load, number of marines and their equipment carried, and some other factors
Enjoy watching. Cheers!
------------
Credits:
www.military-today.com/
www.airforce-technology.com/
hum3d.com/3d-models/albion-cl...
thaimilitaryandasianregion.wo...
www.artstation.com/artwork/aR...
elements.envato.com/mistral-s...
hum3d.com/3d-models/type-071-...
hum3d.com/3d-models/juan-carl...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.usmilitaryart.com/Amphibs...
------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com. - Розваги
the canberra class is the same ship as the juan carlos 1 class, both are made by Navantia and are based on the same design
The Canberra class is slightly different from Juan Carlos 1 class due to the Canberra class's enforced Lloyd's Naval Rules.
@@valenrn8657 Nonsense.
@@Muarijun
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberra-class_landing_helicopter_dock
_Unlike the Spanish vessel, the Australian ships are built to meet Lloyd's Naval Rules_
Try again
@@Muarijun
navalinstitute.com.au/hmas-canberra-dwarfs-structures-on-suva-wharf/
_Canberra has the same physical dimensions as Juan Carlos I, but differs in the design of the island superstructure and the internal layout, in order to meet Australian conditions and requirements. Unlike the Spanish vessel, the Australian ships are built to meet Lloyd’s Naval Rules._
Are you people slow?
The australian Camberra class is made by Navantia, the same spanish company that made the Juan Carlos I
From deck up and in side it's Australian made.
Yeah it's Spanish too
@@georgepantazis141 Yes, but of for yes is spanish, because it made the same company of spain, (Navantia) But Navantia opened the other company in Australy
Si. Son buques de la clase Juan Carlos I. El casco fue construido en España y la superestructura en Australia por una union de empresas españolas y australianas para adaptarla a las necesidades concretas de Australia. Hay otro navio gemelo construido para Turquia.
It is the same boat with different onboard systems adapted to the needs of the Australian Navy.
In Spain we are delighted with the trust that the Australian Navy has placed in Navantia, and we hope that the collaboration with the Australian government and companies will last for many years.
The Juan Carlos I and the Canberra Class are the same ship make by the espanish Navantia.
Same hull. Island, weapons control systems etc etc are customized to ADF requirements and built by BAE Australia. So, different.
@@kcharles8857 Details. They are the same basic ship
@@Muarijun
navalinstitute.com.au/hmas-canberra-dwarfs-structures-on-suva-wharf/
Canberra has the same physical dimensions as Juan Carlos I, but differs in the design of the island superstructure and the internal layout, in order to meet Australian conditions and requirements. Unlike the Spanish vessel, the Australian ships are built to meet Lloyd’s Naval Rules.
Nope. Spanish ship is designed as a light aircraft carrier with docking capability.
Australian ships are built to be dedicated amphibious assault ships.
They might look the same from outside.
But their internal layout and the way they operate are completely different.
U left out the Type 075 LHD of the PLAN which has a displacement of 41K T same as the wasp class.
There is not enough info on the Type 075 to rank it, As we know, China doesn't really give any specifics on what it can carry or what systems it has and what performance those systems have are all unknown Info, therefore it's much harder to rank the Type075
This channel either ignores Chinese weapons completely, or it will rank them lower than some random country's old stuff anyway.
@@tritium1998 Again, there is not enough info to rank them accurately.
@@Justineexy There actually is enough info to rank them comparatively, but like I said this channel and its fanbase will be dumb about it.
@@tritium1998 It is ok, otherwise, it will feed the China Threat crows
*Thanks for posting this video!!!*
I watched a clip of the French Mistral class ship, and I was very impressed. It can operate a hospital along with everything else it does.
egypt got 2 mistral class from france
Most of these vessels include medical facilities.
@@dbyers3897 Medical facilities is not exactly what I'm talking about. The French ship as I watched the video on it, has the potential to have a larger than usual medical facility, almost like a Hospital ship.
So, the Canberra class is the same ship as Juan Carlos 1 class (both built by the spanish company Navantia), so, why one ranked higher than another?
It's probably down to better configuration done by BAE I assume
The Canberra class is Australian made from deck up and inside.
Camberra class have some modifications, like some diferent weapons, and big changes in the superstructure
Because Canberra is a dedicated amphibious assault ship. Unlike Juan Carlos 1 which is built to be a light aircraft carrier with docking capability.
Juan Carlos can't handle amphibious operations to the same level as Canberra.
@@RR-us2kp Why do you say that JuanCarlosI can't handle amphibious operations?
Thanks Buzz
Addicted to this Channel ❣️
Welcome to our world😁
Proud of our LHD Juan Carlos I. Regards from Spain ! Good video !
Camberra class its the same ship of Juan Carlos l
yes and no. the Spanish has been modded for STOVL and ammunition storage, the Australian government refuses to provide the LHD any missile defence and also mod out for a very small cost [Aus $500 million] the changes the Spanish JC has made. Again pissing off China is the reason. Appeasement, PM Scott Morrison is a sop.
@@williambroadstreet3353 Like you said, yes and no. Missiles are carried by the escorts, putting them on Canberras just adds more weight and cost. The Canberras are also not supposed to carry aircraft. They are amphibious ships. If we have them carry fixed-wing aircraft, then they can't carry as many vehicles.
French Mistral class from what i read and watched (From US source) should be up there i think.
France has one of the largest sea area to protect among all countries (Mediterranean, Atlantic, Pacific, Indian ocean to name the large oceans).
Los buques de Australia y España son el mismo modelo y fabricados en España por Navantia
Enteros no, muchos sistemas no son de Navantia son diseño australiano, es el mismo buque pero con muchos sistemas a requerimiento de la armada australiana
Basicamente son una version australiana del JC1º, aqui se fabrico el casco y buen parte del interior, pero la la superestructura y el resto de sistemas se montaron alli
@@OscarMartinez-fn5pi estamos hablando del diseño del buque. Cada país monta sus sistemas de combate, pero el diseño es el mismo.
@@joselozano577 yeah you’re wrong. Oscar is correct. Nice try though.
si, es el mismo diseño... una plancha para planchar!!
@@joshholde2961 una plancha capaz de operar hasta con 30 aparatos 😉
el camberra y el juan carlos I, son lo mismo
As former Gator Navy (LPD-8 and LPD-10), not only did my ships NEVER carry MBTs but no ship in my battle group carried MBTs. Having either LCUs or LCACs in the Well deck would mean almost no room for anything else and the LCAC can only carry one MBT at a time. LHAs can carry two LCACs but that only means that only two MBTs could be deployed and they would have to make a return trip to get anymore. MBTs were either flown in or carried by special carriers and offloaded pier side.
I remember seeing USMC M1 Abrams on-board the USS Essex LHD-2 being taken from and back to Camp Pendleton in the mid 90s.
@@dundonrl Didn't say it wasn't possible. I was stating, from a tactile and logistical standpoint, you would need every, Amphib in the Navy to get barely two tank platoons to any particular location. Those same ships could offload scores of AAVs and LAVs with the same equipment giving the marines they are carrying mobility and semi protection.
when i was in, every mau had a platoon of m60 mbt's and a platoon of lvt (aav) amtracs.
Top 10 SLBM and ALBM video release
This year, the Turkish TCG anatolian ship will enter the inventory.
Never heard of the Trieste class?
Credo abbia fatto una lista di navi d'assalto anfibio in servizio
@@yee3953 esatto
Well, that ship haven't commissioned yet. If you really want to bloat the list with out of service ships, then the 3rd place should go to the Tarawa-class. Last of the class decommissioned in 215, but two of the class is still in reserve. I have a hunch that those two ship could enter active service sooner then the Trieste (which is not a class at all, just a single ship). BTW, the converted Essex-es (Boxer-class) could be outrank every non-american ships in the list too. Even the much smaller (less then half displacement compared to the current american landing carriers) Iwo Jima-class were able to complement more marines then any non-american ship in the list (and the escort carrier conversion Thetis Bay had a marine complement of 1300, that is more then double of the Trieste's normal complement). So if you want the Trieste in the list, then the places 1-5 (or even to 6th) belongs to current and past american ships.
@@egyeneskifli7808 but the American ships didn’t have F35 or merlin and Aw 126 on their decks
@@pietrodicanio9404 Which american ships don't have them? All of the currently commissioned landing carriers have F-35Bs, and the two in reserve can handle them too. The Italians only got 2 so far, and those were never touched the surface of the Trieste. So the Trieste is the one which don't have them.
Merlin? For what end the US Navy should use them. There is the SH/MH-60 family.
What is the AW 126? Even AgustaWestland doesn't know about its existence. If you mean AW-129, then so what? USMC have the AH-1Z.
And what about troop transport in the Trieste? Does she have CH-53 or MV-22?
Trieste will be a good and capable ship. When she enters active service. For the time being she in not an operational ship, which means she has absolutely no real capabilities.
Juan Carlo I = CANBERRA. Built in Spain.
Haul only.
Nice video and very informative and very entertaining and very satisfaction more videos.
Bro post a video on top 10 Minesweeper ship
I like this Amphibious
For DOKDO Class photo, the first photo is not DOKDO Class 6111, but it is the Japanese submarine hunter helicopter carrier "HYUGA" 1881!
To the western people, they're all the same. Japanese, Koreans etc. They're all Asian
First viewer . Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
No Trieste or type 75?
At 2:08 , this is the japanese Helicoptercarrier "Hyūga", not a Dokdo class ship.
They look the same, I wouldn't be surprised if the buzz got confused.
@@Justineexy They don't look the same if you can read numbers. JS Hyūga is hull number 81 which is clearly visible here while ROKS Dokdo is hull number 6111 which can be seen on both sides of the superstructure. Also, Dokdo mounts a large air search radar between the two funnels which is absent on Hyūga.
Please top 10 MRAP vehicles
Nooo i was late
it miss Trieste an Cavour...
...It's normal...Why tell worldwide that there are ultimate italian engineered ships?Naaah better to hide everything, 'cause latinos cannot produce something competitive ...
@@serwolf2443 Italians aren't proper Latinos... Latinos is proper definition fro Center and South America
Because Cavour is a carrier and Trieste is not yet in active service
Hello . Love from Bangladesh . 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩 . #Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩
bhai tumhare yaha hamesha islamic katarpanthi hinduo ko kyu nishana banate hai
aj ek temple tor diya aisa kyu hai tum bata sakte ho
Why are warships so entertaining ;-;
The San Antonio class is not really an "assault" ship. It's designed to provide long term support for the Marines.
they're putting NSMs on it....
Really!! Have you ever been aboard one!!??
@@enricomandragona163 Sure have. Built 6 of them and did sea trials.
Yeah ok unsubstantiated!!
I'm glad they redesign the mass, hated that fiberglass mass.
Why didn't you include Japan's Izumo class or China's type 075 class 40000 tonnes LHD? These amphibious assault ship certainly deserve to be top 10
The Izumo should be, but I don’t think the type 075 can compete with most or any of these in capability
@@bomomorses I don't know much about the type 075 capability, but it weighs 40000 tonnes, literally the size of the French Charles de Gaulle nuclear aircraft carrier or India's Vikramaditya carrier. I feel that alone warrants a spot on the list
@@solomonokoli212 Again I’m still leaning more towards what I said and you have a good point, although the Type 075 does weigh 40000 tons, it really is just a mirrored and less capable image of the Wasp. The size and most of its capabilities should earn it a spot on the list, you are right
@@bomomorses Damn, now that you mentioned the Wasp, I actually see the resemblance, lol. Type 075 does look like a shiny imitation. Yeah, you're right, it's definitely not as good as the Wasp class.
@@bomomorses Are you kidding me?!
TCG Anadolu is turkish made amphibious assault ship 232 meter long carriying hospital helicopters vtol fighter jet and carries mbt up to 50 and with many armored vehicles and carries armored amphibious assault vehicle ZAHA only two countries have this tech turkey and usa and also carries many USV unmanned sea vehicles.
TCG Anadolu with these specs deserves 3rd place on that list
And it has got a ramp to be able to fly aircrafts
The San Antonio, Type 71 Yuzhao, and Albion is claasified as Amphibious transport Dock, not aas
There is no such thing as an AAS. It's called a LPD, LHD, LHA.
( Landing platform dock ) San Antonia, Type 071, Albion
( Landing Helicopter Dock ) Wasp, Trieste, Mistral, Type 075, Ex-Ocean
( Landing Helicopter Assault ) America
u forgot the Type 075 and 076. both btw are better then the america class
@Austin Carr in what world?
Finally some helicopter carriers time to commit watch!!
(Isnt HCV and Amphibious assault ship the same thing?????)
No, a helicopter carrier is a carrier that operates helicopters. Amphibious assault ships operate helicopters, but also have a well deck to launch amphibious assault boats and equipment. U.S.S. America is a helicopter carrier, but the rest of the America class will be Amphibious assault ships. America was designed without a well deck as an experiment to test the old Sea control ship concept that dated from the 1970s. It was done as with the F-35B, they finally had a supersonic V/Stol aircraft such a ship would require.
Atlantico is a Ex-Royal Navy ship so how did it come up higher on the list than are current amphibious ship Except from it is basically a helicopter carrier
It's a UA-cam top 10 list man. Don't bother
But where is the Type 075 assault carrier :(
The Brazilian one is the old HMS Ocean
yes
The American class has 2 models, the first made without well deck, one more will be made this way, the rest of this class will have well decks. The Navy/Marines want a small fast light carrier, with this more F35b can fly off with larger fuel more space for work crews. Pretty good idea.
You make a video "minesweeper ship in the world".
The Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier has amphibious capability as it Second role is amphibious if need
Even people in the royal navy say that's a terrible idea.
Amphibious operations are done close to hostile shores.
A carrier should never be in that place. It should be far out at sea.
Update. Albion class now run with Phalanx fwd and aft
the yuzhao class should be get replaced by the 075,Yuzhao is a different type of ship
Miss Kim q&a kab karogi? 🤔
I guess nations still expect to fight WW2 style Pacific theater amphibious assaults.
Clearly not. These vessels are for strategic sealift not for suicidal huge scale opposed landings which have gone the way of massed airborne drops.
2:05 that is not the Dokdo class ship picture........
That sensor arrays indicate that it was an Japanese ship
Ha ha here we go
And italian Trieste ??
The wasp and america class are aircraft carriers in their own right
No
@@ignacioburkhardt789 Yes. They're classed as helicopter assault ships, but they also have the capability to carry and support fixed wing aircraft such as the Harrier and F35.
Not even close. They can carry VSTOL aircraft, but they are nowhere close to aircraft carriers. Flight deck is too short, no catapult and do not have the elevators or the storage to do sustained combat operations if they were specially modified to carry ONLY VSTOL aircraft.
Saw my USS Essex (LHD2). Very first thing I noticed was the rust. All the other ships were fairly clean and my tub was like "Paint? nah it's just gonna rust again." I have some BM2 friends who would shit a brick if they saw that. In fact. Time to share this. LOL
EPA laws don't allow painting of ships outside of the hull unless it's in drydock unfortunately
@@enricomandragona163 when did this happen? our crew painted the side every time we were in home port. there was even a floating barge with scaffolding just for it.
@@ryanmartin4602 same here in Mayport FLA. I'm gonna guess about 15 yrs ago
Number of ships built pls
It seems China has 40k tons LHD - Type 075, not listed here.
The Camberra Class and Juan Carlos Class are the same ship only different for these ships are the electronic systems build from Australian army and little different in the defense systems. The rest building are the same because in the Spanish navy proyecting buying in first time the F-35B from this ship. The reallity is the operated flying ground are Harrier 2 SeaHawks and Sea King from navy. From Spanish army Chinook, Nh90 and Tiger HAP.
They're not the same ship. One is a light aircraft carrier. Other is an amphibious assault ship. They work in completely different methods
@@RR-us2kp Pues el portahelicópteros sobra en este video, ya que es un top de Barcos de asalto anfibios 🤔😉👍
Why no have 075?
IZUMO Class ？？
what about Trieste class? 245m LHD, not worthy of mention?
The America class is no way near the size of the Midway class even in its WW-2 straight deck configuration of 900' in length!! Which would of been a more useful length for the America class!!
Where is the izumo class and hyuga class?
So... the Netherlands no longer exists? Rotterdam class and Karel Doorman class. The first one is a specific built LPD. It carries 130 crew and can carry up to 604 extra crew, like marines, airmen and other types of armed forces. It's 166 meters long and has a water displacement of 12,750 metric tons. It's top speed is 21 kts. It's armed with 10 M2HB .50 caliber machine guns and 2 Goalkeeper CIWS systems. It can carry up to 6 NH-90's, Chinooks or Cougars and has can carry up to 5 landing craft. It has a dock at the back which it can load troops and material through, it can even carry tanks and vehicles like that. The ship itself also has some stealth technologies. It furthermore also carries it's own command center, making it capable of leading missions on its own. Looking at all this, it outperforms most of the ships on the list.
even 40000 tonnes huge Amphibious assault ships Chinese Type075 is also missed
Strange that you mention HNLMS Rotterdam and not HNLMS Johan de Witt which is bigger and has a commandcenter.
Well the two spanish LPD Galicia class ere even bigger and don't appear in this video
Seems like everyone can wake up here and write down his personal top ten.... Than show to everyone on UA-cam..... Please continue with more sci fi.....
America and Wasp class are externally the same dimensions. Also the Wasp class (and I'm sure the America class) is capable of almost 8 knots faster than what you're saying!
Atlantico was previously HMS Ocean 😂
What about TCG Anadolu?
juan Carlos
@@PortgasDAce-rt8yo but they mentioned the Australian one which is also Juan Carlos type
The Cranberra and the Juan Carlos I look almost identical
Both of them buit in Spain by Navantia.
Navantia design
What about the Tonnerre class?
The Tonnerre is a Mistral class
@@orxi2 fair point
French Mistral class N°7, you're joking...
It was a list made on displacement.
LHD TRIESTE 36.000 ton IT
Votre reportage date peut être , on ne parle pas du Trieste italien !!
where is type 075?
On fire
where is tcg anadolu lhd
Wow a good channel.
Speak about the Mistral.
This channel at the first picture: show the Tonnerre.
Genius. What a good work. Please, make researchs before making those videos.
I finish this video, please stop watch this channel. They speak about the Mistral but not about the Tonnerre when the Tonnerre is better than the Mistral. So they litterraly forgot one of the best amphibious boat in the world.
Wow good.
How many others did they forgot ? I'm curious.
Where is type 75 amphibious assault ship???
China Type 075 like copy of Australian Canberra class
@@f-35lightningii6 40000+tons, don't comparec the monster to your little boat
You forgot to include in the list, the new amphibious ship of the Italian navy, which is called Trieste
Not in service yet
That's "sad"
@@RR-us2kp 4:13 Atlantico Brasilian ? Decomissionad 2018 .
Type 075?
Izumo?
No china type 075?
indian amphibious assault ship 🙏🙏
You missed 075 of PLAN…
Where is the Trieste Class of Italian Navy is better than Juan Carlos Class
I like the videos too much, I don't understand why I have few subscribers.
A kiss from Brazil
Video needs an update soon.
075-40000
Une fois de plus, pour montrer la force et la primauté des USA, dans ce classement on mélange des choux et des carottes !
You missed Chinese Type75 Amphibious assault ship
both Chinese type 075 and 076 are 40000 tonnes huge Amphibious assault ships
075 is made by papper.Made in China ,don't worry.
@@user-bz5iy9oy2q China is not as good as India. An Indian submarine can explode and sink in its own port, which is rare in the ages.
@@user-bz5iy9oy2q are you guys safe in india? have fun with covid
@@leejo5160 azhe
Et le Mistral ?????
No mention of Russian bungie ski jumping aerial assault class ship. Very Nice ship !
Sorry but the Camberra class doenst's exist is the same Juan Carlos I, both of Navantia
Only French Mistral Class is real Amphibious Ship , all others are hybrid between aircraft carriers and Destroyers.
Ese es tan anfibio como el Canberra y el JCI
竹島級は海上オブジェですか？
Why? didn't you show our TCG ANADOLU from turkey
Because it is the Juan Carlos with less capabilities (no Jets) and the Anadolu is Turkish, but it is more precisely from Spain.
@@rollerrollerichson6258 yes but only the design is Spanish rest of the ship are with different and more modern tech
Where is China Type 076.
In garbage
075 is out of top 10???
Egypt have two Mistral class
Indeed, they where built for Russia before the sell being cancelled because of the annexation of Crimea.
@@laurentboitouzet9793 👍👍
and the French Mistral class ,with its 200m long/20000 tonns and ultra versatility!!!🤕
#7 dude
Where is China's 075 level?
WHERE ARE TRIESTE AND CAVOUR...???????
The US Ships waoooo champions
WTF, the Australian ship is the ONLY ship without any meaningful air defence weapons. Well done ADF, you knuckle heads.