Don’t forget the time Jack analyzed one of her reactions and realized she’s not even reacting to the videos in real time cause on her glasses reflection you could see her screen was just white Wait one more. Don’t forget she stole her gamer girl schtick from GirlGoneGamer by saying she faked her gameplay. Her sub count literally jumped at least 30k. Yeah, that’s how she got her break
It is the birth of UA-cam and reaction content is considered lazy and everyone demands them to be abolished. It is 2015 and reaction content is considered lazy and everyone demands them to be abolished. It is 2023 and reaction content is considered lazy and everyone demands them to be abolished. It is 3134 and reaction content is considered lazy and everyone demands them to be abolished.
back in the days, it wasn't so much of it was just 'lAzy' therefore EVERYONE apparently wanted to be abolished because of some contrived ethics being put out in the matter... it was simply going against soem Tubers who were easy to be made fun of & that was essential just it... 'Reaction Content' was still thriving on by its nature through the audience watching lots of it such as 'REACT' etc. Reaction channels work on the parasocial nature that's ingrained within Humans but that doesn't mean that everyone who seeks reaction content will thrive off for just the 'parasocial' aspect; it could be because you want more additional information from the type of feedback that's being transpired through the subject matter of a piece of media that's being consumed, this also goes to any type of medium that you personally enjoy & want to seek any form of a 'Reaction' for some type of feedback/information to that piece of media that you enjoy.
This whole "debate" would be irrelevant if UA-cam would just create a built-in mechanism for reacting to other videos. Rather than Reactors inserting the video into their own, their video would consist only of their reaction itself and the timecode of the original video. Then they would somehow link it to the original, and UA-cam would composite them together in real-time. That way, the original video still gets a view, and people can make reactions without worrying about copyright. Everybody wins.
They could just auto link monetazation if the copyright is triggered/ manually selected by the channel owner. They could also try implementing a percentage system based on how many times the video is paused and actually reacted to just to encourage more transformation to the video.
While i definitely think you make a good point with this YT kind of already had this function in the past with video replies - this is ancient history by now but it did lead to the "Reply Girl" phenomenon which was one of the most hated archetypes on the platform, probably even more so than reaction content Sadly I don't think YT cares enough about this to do anything about it, especially since the reactors draw such a big audience. It's depressing that this "content" which seems universally despised still going as strong as ever
From what I remember, Jacksfilms was going to branch out the SSSniperwolf Bingo to Reactor Bingo, where he criticizes a more varied line of lazy reactors. Unfortunately on the day he was launching Reactor bingo, SSSniperwolf went to his house, so that whole idea never went further, and I believe content on that stream is lost media, outsidenof the moment Jacksfilms finds out SSSniperwolf went to his house. Such a shame that she did that when Jacksfilms was planning on talking about other lazy reactors. Also request for UA-cam History, Scott the Woz.
The fact that those ladies were trying to tell Ian to pay Jinx back for “ruining his career“ was absolutely stupid. Maybe having the proper amount of research in the situation would probably help you understand the situation more but no, idubz was in the wrong 🙄🙄🙄
There’s something funny and ironic about IHE calling out lazy reaction content since his friend Adum/YMS has lately been leaning into said reaction content (along with leaning a whole lot into the Poggers community)
Been following YMS for years and recently quit his second channel for this very reason - the editor shoehorning in their creepy fursona in the content didn't help either
There is another reality where people are like "there is another reality where a famous youtuber ghosts a fan, kid with cancer, how crazy would that be?"
streaming reactors are significantly worse than the reactors of old were. at least most of them back in the day tried to do something different with the content these streamers now barely even watch the video and just stare at a chat that strokes their ego the entire time
@@valetboy21 Is his rambles channel his main channel? We're the react drama videos uploaded to his rambles channel? No he is a gaming UA-camr with a bit of commentary mixed in there but he is not a commentary channel
@usernamepassword236 he's kinda lumped in there nowadays since he kinda has a habit of getting himself involved in drama with other commentary youtubers seemingly at random
the fine brothers situation was hilarious as they would only hjave been able to stop other people from calling there contact the particular names that they used but the names being so simple would mean they wouldn't have gotten the copyright on it anyways and they would have never been able to stop other channels from directly copying them as they would have to prove that someone else couldn't have came up with people reacting to something as a idea
this has been and always will be my take on this situation, I think the concept of reaction content is fine, so long as your adding something to the video to make it transformative in lieu of just sitting there adding nothing but dead space, my personal pick for the greatest reactor ever would be Hobo Ryan, every time he watches something he adds his own thoughts to the video as well as having hilarious reactions, he puts in some genuinely funny skits as well, no one really tops Ryan and I don't think anybody ever will. I also think it's only fair to credit the original creator in the description as well, I'm actually a former reactor myself but I gave up on it back in November 2021, those videos were nothing special anyways.
2016 was the last time UA-cam was good. There were idiots that took things to far but at least people were able to express themselves and appeal to their own niche. Now everyone had to be family friendly to appeal to the masses which is stupid. The more I watch YT documentaries the more I think I should be off the internet a lot more.
Xqc point about reaction viewers not having the full content of the video if they only get to see parts of the video makes no sense. Lazy reaction channels constantly argue that they are giving exposure to the original creator. If that’s the case wouldn’t the reaction viewers see the context of the clips once they go and watch the whole original video. Even then if xqc is so worried context being lost through snippets which is doesn’t make sense because summarization and condensing things is something people have been doing for a long time. Why doesn’t he work on his summarization skills so that he can include snippets of the key stuff from the video without removing context of the video
In SSSniperwolf case, why didn't you mentioned Dhar Mann whitewashing her image by putting her in one of the creepiest series on his channel despite being aware of the doxxing shit?
I hate reaction channels, but no one including myself should hate them because the earliest channels were black. It's bigotted, and I am solely against racism towards UA-camrs who make bad content. It's immoral, so *do not* harass them. I loved Chadtronic back then and now; he even collaborated with SammyClassicSonicFan after reacting to his most notorious videos from years ago. But SSSniperwolf is the worst offender, since she ghosted a dying fan, sexted minors on Omegle, and doxxed Jacksfilms' home to her simps(which is not only a violation of UA-cam's Terms of Service, but Instagram where the video was posted as well). I'm baffled UA-cam still promotes her instead of terminating the channel, because like they usually do, the platform cares about money than sympathizing with other creators.
@@gruzi. lmao this comment made me die bro regardless of race it doesn’t excuse being lazy fucks, if OP actually enjoyed these channels they are stupid af
@@gruzi. I'm aware they haven't created reaction videos, but my statement is true regarding bad content. I do not condone racism against users who make shitty videos on a daily basis, nor do I encourage it, especially towards Jinx. As I mentioned earlier, reaction videos have begun to surface relating to people's reaction to internet screamers(K-Fee or the Scary Maze Game), and erotic material like 2 Girls 1 Cup like this episode of UA-cam History explained. Reaction content is nothing new and only a few of them turn out to be complete scumbags and awful people irl. SSSniperwolf is just one of the maggots on this platform for not only stealing content and uncrediting the creators, but she doxxed Jacksfilms, ghosted a dying fan, sexted minors on Omegle, and had a criminal history of armed robbery and physical assault on the UA-camr she stole her mojo from.
It’s a real shame. I used to really enjoy his try not to laugh back in the day, but as soon as he started delving into critical drinker territory, I had to tune right out.
34:35 This was a problem with the Poggers Community video and still is here: HIS LIVING SITUATION IS THE *LEAST* VALID THING YOU CAN CRITICIZE HIM FOR! Criticize him for his actions and refrain from personal attacks. Just doing this boosts his biggest problem: HIS EGO! He’s so overconfident and acts childishly to the point where some times he points out people arguing against him and timing them out. Attacking him in this way will just make him think: “the only reason these people go after me is because of who I associate with and not what I personally have done, so the greatest likelihood is that I haven’t done anything wrong.” If you’re gonna go after asmongold don’t just comment on his room and living conditions and how he looks. It just makes you look like you have NO real argument against him. Hell, in a later video he made he acknowledged how his reaction video of the actman’s content cannibalized a video he reacted to so there is a play where you can say he’s being negligent with the content he reacts to and how that can affect the original video’s performance.
I had issue with the stuff he felt good enough about to put out into the world, imagine the actual cut bits we’re not seeing here. Watch his streams and watch the fireworks.
Complaining about reacts is equally as cringe as doing it. Both are lowest common denominator garbage "content". Almost as bad as "12 hour retrospective" thats just reading off plots of episodes or games
React channels take away views from the actual channels and gives money to talentless hacks. Atleast the one making videos complaining about them are making actual content.
32:39 He did distinguish between good and bad reaction content. As written on the first page: "Keep in mind that ‘reactors’ are not reviewers, analysts, documentarians, expert critics, or video essayists. They are people who present their first experience of a video as content, doing so with no idea if they have anything of substance to contribute as they haven’t seen the content before. In other words they present their ‘reaction’ to something they have not seen instead of putting actual effort into making something after the fact once they know they have something of value to add."
that last segment of the argument was pretty contrived on its semantic levels of value to determine what a 'Reaction Content Creator' should absolutely transpire & generalise to what it should & shouldn't be as based on how the sentiment played coil of ''Reaction Content is about how ppl present their reaction as a 'first hand experience' towards the content that is naturally presentable for reaction content i.e. doing so makes the content creator have no idea if they're contributing any sort or form of substance as they haven't seen the content before" - the sentiment falls flat based on what to determine a 'Reaction Content Creator' based on serving 0 substance provided as they haven't seen the content from before, while throwing semantics at the over-generalisations of what a 'Reaction Content Creator' is in absolute truth & informally labelling everyone who does that type of content.
I don't care if Charlei doesn't do react content "that much" anymore. He gained his wealth and his following by playing entire movies with little to no commentary. His most popular videos and streams are reactions. And when he's not leeching, he's rambling for 10 minutes, saying literally nothing valuable. If I made a living shoplifting and reselling what I stole, I don't suddenly become a good person because I turn to shoplifting only every few weeks instead, and apologizing everytime I'm caught.
1:00 This one was always funny to me. At this point, Jacksfilms channel was essentially just reading what other people wrote, with no real attempt to make it entertaining. Not defending reactors, but yeah, Jack was just about as lazy.
If you’re gonna criticize IHE, criticize him for watching the last jedi a plural amount of times and ask the question of “Did Disney pay you for free screenings?” It’s not the craziest thing to consider. Politicians pay youtubers via super-PACs to contractually perpetuate their talking points just enough for the mainstream to accept it.
I dont understand why UA-cam hasn't figured out a way to send royalties to the original creator when their content is reacted to and why UA-cam doesn't monetize reaction content at a smaller margin as other content
He doesnt compare reactors to rapists. Rob youre better than this. The comparison he makes is how a reactor will react to a video and seek consent after the fact. the comparison is made because this isnt the meaning of consent and if you used that meaning anywhere else it would be awful. In addition it takes an outstanding level of dishonesty to pretend this is what hes saying, because he's clarified this point multiple times. Do better.
![[UA] Eternal Fire проти NAVI | EPL Season 20 Malta](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/chvlsDygrZM/mqdefault.jpg)
Hearing idubbz moral grandstand while knowing how he would end up is kinda funny ngl.
He would never call out a camwhore now for fear of upsetting his wife and her boyfriend.
A change which happened so suddenly and imperceptibly yet so slowly
Don’t forget the time Jack analyzed one of her reactions and realized she’s not even reacting to the videos in real time cause on her glasses reflection you could see her screen was just white
Wait one more. Don’t forget she stole her gamer girl schtick from GirlGoneGamer by saying she faked her gameplay. Her sub count literally jumped at least 30k. Yeah, that’s how she got her break
It is the birth of UA-cam and reaction content is considered lazy and everyone demands them to be abolished.
It is 2015 and reaction content is considered lazy and everyone demands them to be abolished.
It is 2023 and reaction content is considered lazy and everyone demands them to be abolished.
It is 3134 and reaction content is considered lazy and everyone demands them to be abolished.
back in the days, it wasn't so much of it was just 'lAzy' therefore EVERYONE apparently wanted to be abolished because of some contrived ethics being put out in the matter...
it was simply going against soem Tubers who were easy to be made fun of & that was essential just it...
'Reaction Content' was still thriving on by its nature through the audience watching lots of it such as 'REACT' etc.
Reaction channels work on the parasocial nature that's ingrained within Humans but that doesn't mean that everyone who seeks reaction content will thrive off for just the 'parasocial' aspect; it could be because you want more additional information from the type of feedback that's being transpired through the subject matter of a piece of media that's being consumed, this also goes to any type of medium that you personally enjoy & want to seek any form of a 'Reaction' for some type of feedback/information to that piece of media that you enjoy.
This whole "debate" would be irrelevant if UA-cam would just create a built-in mechanism for reacting to other videos.
Rather than Reactors inserting the video into their own, their video would consist only of their reaction itself and the timecode of the original video. Then they would somehow link it to the original, and UA-cam would composite them together in real-time.
That way, the original video still gets a view, and people can make reactions without worrying about copyright. Everybody wins.
They could just auto link monetazation if the copyright is triggered/ manually selected by the channel owner. They could also try implementing a percentage system based on how many times the video is paused and actually reacted to just to encourage more transformation to the video.
While i definitely think you make a good point with this YT kind of already had this function in the past with video replies - this is ancient history by now but it did lead to the "Reply Girl" phenomenon which was one of the most hated archetypes on the platform, probably even more so than reaction content
Sadly I don't think YT cares enough about this to do anything about it, especially since the reactors draw such a big audience. It's depressing that this "content" which seems universally despised still going as strong as ever
@@IronFreakV Also a good point. UA-cam would rather deal with current problems than fix them and deal with newer problems.
2016 was both a better and horrible time
2016 is full of drama or political stuff but I did kinda miss vine lol.
it was a wonderful time for me, the best year of my life in fact💕❤
@@AbrasiousProductions nah it was garbage time lol nothing but drama UA-cam died a long time ago.
@@joandarc441 I was meaning more life in general in lieu of youtube but I do have fond memories of 2016 UA-cam
@@AbrasiousProductions it was decent but it was just full of drama then rant then politics of course the Logan Paul.
From what I remember, Jacksfilms was going to branch out the SSSniperwolf Bingo to Reactor Bingo, where he criticizes a more varied line of lazy reactors. Unfortunately on the day he was launching Reactor bingo, SSSniperwolf went to his house, so that whole idea never went further, and I believe content on that stream is lost media, outsidenof the moment Jacksfilms finds out SSSniperwolf went to his house. Such a shame that she did that when Jacksfilms was planning on talking about other lazy reactors.
Also request for UA-cam History, Scott the Woz.
The fact that those ladies were trying to tell Ian to pay Jinx back for “ruining his career“ was absolutely stupid. Maybe having the proper amount of research in the situation would probably help you understand the situation more but no, idubz was in the wrong 🙄🙄🙄
Ssssniperwolf has original videos? Heck, not even her persona is original.
Sniper Wolf was such an iconic bossfight - to see her identity stolen by an reaction e-girl is a crime.
I remembered the Fine Bros controversy back in early 2016.
Reaction content is a plague and the fine bros killed youtube.
remember the days when Idubbbz was himself and didn't sell out?.. good days...
There’s something funny and ironic about IHE calling out lazy reaction content since his friend Adum/YMS has lately been leaning into said reaction content (along with leaning a whole lot into the Poggers community)
Been following YMS for years and recently quit his second channel for this very reason - the editor shoehorning in their creepy fursona in the content didn't help either
I feel incredibly guilty for enjoying the fine bros reactions back in 2011-2013.. why was I such a stupid kid?!
you're having some messed up cognition of what you feel 'guilty' about...
@@godzillazfriction what do you mean?
There is another reality where people are like "there is another reality where a famous youtuber ghosts a fan, kid with cancer, how crazy would that be?"
streaming reactors are significantly worse than the reactors of old were. at least most of them back in the day tried to do something different with the content
these streamers now barely even watch the video and just stare at a chat that strokes their ego the entire time
Darkviper isnt a commentary youtuber
What would you call his Rambles channel? I am a fan of DarkViper's work, both his gameplay and his rambles, but his rambles are commentary.
@@valetboy21 Is his rambles channel his main channel? We're the react drama videos uploaded to his rambles channel? No he is a gaming UA-camr with a bit of commentary mixed in there but he is not a commentary channel
@@usernamepassword236rambles used to be on his main channel before he made a separate channel for them
@@jourteen7795 yeah I know so what? Doesn't make him a commentary UA-camr
@usernamepassword236 he's kinda lumped in there nowadays since he kinda has a habit of getting himself involved in drama with other commentary youtubers seemingly at random
God damn idubbz used to be so much fun. What happened
the fine brothers situation was hilarious as they would only hjave been able to stop other people from calling there contact the particular names that they used but the names being so simple would mean they wouldn't have gotten the copyright on it anyways and they would have never been able to stop other channels from directly copying them as they would have to prove that someone else couldn't have came up with people reacting to something as a idea
Lmaooooo the Israel flag as Idubs wallpaper in the Fine Bros content cop
this has been and always will be my take on this situation, I think the concept of reaction content is fine, so long as your adding something to the video to make it transformative in lieu of just sitting there adding nothing but dead space, my personal pick for the greatest reactor ever would be Hobo Ryan, every time he watches something he adds his own thoughts to the video as well as having hilarious reactions, he puts in some genuinely funny skits as well, no one really tops Ryan and I don't think anybody ever will. I also think it's only fair to credit the original creator in the description as well, I'm actually a former reactor myself but I gave up on it back in November 2021, those videos were nothing special anyways.
Unless someone will start suing this wont change at all. I just hope someone will misstep with Muta or something like this.
2016 was the last time UA-cam was good. There were idiots that took things to far but at least people were able to express themselves and appeal to their own niche. Now everyone had to be family friendly to appeal to the masses which is stupid. The more I watch YT documentaries the more I think I should be off the internet a lot more.
I don't like reaction content at all... 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Xqc point about reaction viewers not having the full content of the video if they only get to see parts of the video makes no sense. Lazy reaction channels constantly argue that they are giving exposure to the original creator. If that’s the case wouldn’t the reaction viewers see the context of the clips once they go and watch the whole original video. Even then if xqc is so worried context being lost through snippets which is doesn’t make sense because summarization and condensing things is something people have been doing for a long time. Why doesn’t he work on his summarization skills so that he can include snippets of the key stuff from the video without removing context of the video
Why are a majority of reaction content makers….?
Uhm, actually you know what
I’ll just shut up now
most reaction content is one of the laziest forms of content, though reading reddit posts is top
In SSSniperwolf case, why didn't you mentioned Dhar Mann whitewashing her image by putting her in one of the creepiest series on his channel despite being aware of the doxxing shit?
I hate reaction channels, but no one including myself should hate them because the earliest channels were black. It's bigotted, and I am solely against racism towards UA-camrs who make bad content. It's immoral, so *do not* harass them. I loved Chadtronic back then and now; he even collaborated with SammyClassicSonicFan after reacting to his most notorious videos from years ago. But SSSniperwolf is the worst offender, since she ghosted a dying fan, sexted minors on Omegle, and doxxed Jacksfilms' home to her simps(which is not only a violation of UA-cam's Terms of Service, but Instagram where the video was posted as well). I'm baffled UA-cam still promotes her instead of terminating the channel, because like they usually do, the platform cares about money than sympathizing with other creators.
this comment is supposed to be ironic right? black people did not create reaction videos dude 💀
@@gruzi. lmao this comment made me die bro regardless of race it doesn’t excuse being lazy fucks, if OP actually enjoyed these channels they are stupid af
@@gruzi. I'm aware they haven't created reaction videos, but my statement is true regarding bad content. I do not condone racism against users who make shitty videos on a daily basis, nor do I encourage it, especially towards Jinx. As I mentioned earlier, reaction videos have begun to surface relating to people's reaction to internet screamers(K-Fee or the Scary Maze Game), and erotic material like 2 Girls 1 Cup like this episode of UA-cam History explained. Reaction content is nothing new and only a few of them turn out to be complete scumbags and awful people irl. SSSniperwolf is just one of the maggots on this platform for not only stealing content and uncrediting the creators, but she doxxed Jacksfilms, ghosted a dying fan, sexted minors on Omegle, and had a criminal history of armed robbery and physical assault on the UA-camr she stole her mojo from.
It's a shame accounts like Tyrone Magnus still exist
He was cool, but now he sucks
He became one of those anti sjw reactionaries youtubers after his first youtube career starting to died down after getting called out
@@klonoafan2012 I'm surprised Critical Drinker and Mauler allow him on the podcast. He barely even says anything.
it's a shame groomers like you still exist, leave the kids alone freak.
It’s a real shame. I used to really enjoy his try not to laugh back in the day, but as soon as he started delving into critical drinker territory, I had to tune right out.
idubbbz used to be so funny 😂
Funny how nowadays, the first thing that comes to mind when I hear React is the js library/framework. eh, maybe because I'm a programmer though.
34:35 This was a problem with the Poggers Community video and still is here: HIS LIVING SITUATION IS THE *LEAST* VALID THING YOU CAN CRITICIZE HIM FOR! Criticize him for his actions and refrain from personal attacks. Just doing this boosts his biggest problem: HIS EGO! He’s so overconfident and acts childishly to the point where some times he points out people arguing against him and timing them out. Attacking him in this way will just make him think: “the only reason these people go after me is because of who I associate with and not what I personally have done, so the greatest likelihood is that I haven’t done anything wrong.”
If you’re gonna go after asmongold don’t just comment on his room and living conditions and how he looks. It just makes you look like you have NO real argument against him. Hell, in a later video he made he acknowledged how his reaction video of the actman’s content cannibalized a video he reacted to so there is a play where you can say he’s being negligent with the content he reacts to and how that can affect the original video’s performance.
I had issue with the stuff he felt good enough about to put out into the world, imagine the actual cut bits we’re not seeing here. Watch his streams and watch the fireworks.
Complaining about reacts is equally as cringe as doing it. Both are lowest common denominator garbage "content". Almost as bad as "12 hour retrospective" thats just reading off plots of episodes or games
but only one of them requires no effort.
Except one of them harms actual creators
React channels take away views from the actual channels and gives money to talentless hacks.
Atleast the one making videos complaining about them are making actual content.
43:59 someone needs to make a reaction channel with just Hasan content. Like his old young turks shit. He'd probably copyright strike so fast
32:39 He did distinguish between good and bad reaction content. As written on the first page:
"Keep in mind that ‘reactors’ are not reviewers, analysts, documentarians, expert critics, or video essayists. They are people who present their first experience of a video as content, doing so with no idea if they have anything of substance to contribute as they haven’t seen the content before. In other words they present their ‘reaction’ to something they have not seen instead of putting actual effort into making something after the fact once they know they have something of value to add."
that last segment of the argument was pretty contrived on its semantic levels of value to determine what a 'Reaction Content Creator' should absolutely transpire & generalise to what it should & shouldn't be as based on how the sentiment played coil of ''Reaction Content is about how ppl present their reaction as a 'first hand experience' towards the content that is naturally presentable for reaction content i.e. doing so makes the content creator have no idea if they're contributing any sort or form of substance as they haven't seen the content before" - the sentiment falls flat based on what to determine a 'Reaction Content Creator' based on serving 0 substance provided as they haven't seen the content from before, while throwing semantics at the over-generalisations of what a 'Reaction Content Creator' is in absolute truth & informally labelling everyone who does that type of content.
Tbh easy fix for UA-cam would to do something similar to Instagram where you can collaborate on a post and share the views.
Wouldn't work, a lot of these "reactions" are using multiple websites. Twitch streamers get stuff from youtube, youtubers get stuff from tiktoc, etc.
Aye Jack noticed you Rob. Good on ya! 😀
I don't care if Charlei doesn't do react content "that much" anymore. He gained his wealth and his following by playing entire movies with little to no commentary. His most popular videos and streams are reactions. And when he's not leeching, he's rambling for 10 minutes, saying literally nothing valuable. If I made a living shoplifting and reselling what I stole, I don't suddenly become a good person because I turn to shoplifting only every few weeks instead, and apologizing everytime I'm caught.
1:00 This one was always funny to me. At this point, Jacksfilms channel was essentially just reading what other people wrote, with no real attempt to make it entertaining. Not defending reactors, but yeah, Jack was just about as lazy.
31:50 BasedViperAU. He's not even wrong to imply reactors are bad people. They are.
If you’re gonna criticize IHE, criticize him for watching the last jedi a plural amount of times and ask the question of
“Did Disney pay you for free screenings?”
It’s not the craziest thing to consider. Politicians pay youtubers via super-PACs to contractually perpetuate their talking points just enough for the mainstream to accept it.
I dont understand why UA-cam hasn't figured out a way to send royalties to the original creator when their content is reacted to and why UA-cam doesn't monetize reaction content at a smaller margin as other content
This content of yours is super underrated, I love it
i'm surprised you didn't link darkviperau's video about reaction content instead of the essay ua-cam.com/video/Irk8h0ax5aY/v-deo.html
T'es un calice de québécois?
He doesnt compare reactors to rapists. Rob youre better than this.
The comparison he makes is how a reactor will react to a video and seek consent after the fact. the comparison is made because this isnt the meaning of consent and if you used that meaning anywhere else it would be awful. In addition it takes an outstanding level of dishonesty to pretend this is what hes saying, because he's clarified this point multiple times. Do better.
french canadian got me💀