These US Engines are so Powerful They Can Stop a Heavy 400 Tons Plane

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 вер 2023
  • Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel, In this feature, we will take a looks behind the incredible power of the C-5 Galaxy, the US largest aircraft in current service.
    Fluctus is a website and UA-cam channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
    We publish 3 videos a week on our UA-cam channel and many more articles on our website.
    Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
    Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
    / fluctusofficial
    Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
    To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 247

  • @HandFromCoffin
    @HandFromCoffin Місяць тому +3

    If your amazed it can stop a 400 ton plane.. god just wait till you see how game changing shockingly powerful they are.. they can no only stop them but they can make them fly.

  • @cemocan948
    @cemocan948 Місяць тому +4

    Ich würde sogar empfehlen diesen Kanal komplett aus dem Markt zu nehmen

  • @Mr.Wednesday.
    @Mr.Wednesday. 3 місяці тому +5

    Reverse thrust is an indicator of technological marvel? Hasn’t this technology been around for decades and also appears on literally every airliner?

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      -The A-380 only has inboard thrust reversers and great brakes.

  • @stevelukoski7152
    @stevelukoski7152 4 місяці тому +5

    I had the opportunity in my military years to know pilots . Those power plants are amazing . Wow !

  • @abdoubenali572
    @abdoubenali572 3 місяці тому +2

    thumbs up to the amazing engineers creating these engines without googling stuff up.

  • @deonellis8577
    @deonellis8577 Місяць тому +3

    The guys at Rolls Royce are simply standing there...laughing

  • @garymiller5937
    @garymiller5937 9 місяців тому +12

    It astounds me that someone can design an aircraft that can carry such humongous weights! 😮😊😊😊

    • @user-ge9vu3ft8d
      @user-ge9vu3ft8d 7 місяців тому +1

      Donos assassinos máquinas assassinas pilotos assassinos o resto é só tretas para tó-tós

    • @user-cu4tm3xl9z
      @user-cu4tm3xl9z 4 місяці тому +1

      Летающая мишень!

    • @gabrielbraga1981
      @gabrielbraga1981 Місяць тому

      @@user-ge9vu3ft8d ta chapando paizao

  • @Queenfan1961
    @Queenfan1961 Місяць тому +1

    I’ve flown in the passenger compartment in the rear, a nice comfortable ride. When I was deployed to Rota Spain with Fleet Hospital, five, you could hear the screaming Mimi‘s, as I called them, leaving almost around the clock. And awesome aircraft.

  • @jacksonlee3771
    @jacksonlee3771 3 місяці тому +2

    Flew in a C5 from Diego Garcia to Perth, Australia. Huge plane.

  • @Nostromo1966
    @Nostromo1966 8 місяців тому +12

    The A380 engines have twice the power of those in the C5...

    • @JPEGdoge
      @JPEGdoge Місяць тому +1

      What about the ge9x 777 engines?

  • @richardlewis4288
    @richardlewis4288 9 місяців тому +7

    Airline mechanic. Love GE engines. I think the civilian version is the CF6.

  • @danielocarey9392
    @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому +1

    One of the best informational videos I've seen. Good wording. Great visuals. From the commercial version of the J-79 (CJ805) from Evendale Ohio to the leading edge of engine technology by GE today, I can see great futures for both the company and the aircraft manufacturers in need of new power plant designs.

  • @jamram9924
    @jamram9924 9 місяців тому +14

    The C-5M Super Galaxy is equipped with five sets of landing gear, 28 wheels, four General Electric CF6-80C2-L1F (F-138) commercial engines.
    The C-5A and C-5B variants had the General Electric TF-39 engines. Those engines had a familiar scream as the engines spun up or prepared to land.

    • @MrShenron89
      @MrShenron89 9 місяців тому

      General Electric made the TF-39s not P&W.

    • @my-yt-inputs2580
      @my-yt-inputs2580 8 місяців тому +1

      What's a C-5N? You mean C-5B? There's also a C-5C(2 of them) or there was.

    • @LiPo5000
      @LiPo5000 6 місяців тому +1

      @@my-yt-inputs2580 LAST year the U.S. Air Force owns and operates 52 total . . . C-5Bs, C-5Cs, and C-5Ms.

    • @LiPo5000
      @LiPo5000 6 місяців тому

      LAST year the U.S. Air Force owns and operates 52 total . . . C-5Bs, C-5Cs, and C-5Ms.

    • @jamram9924
      @jamram9924 6 місяців тому

      @@LiPo5000 Does that include the 10-12 out in the Boneyard at Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ?

  • @jjsifo1
    @jjsifo1 4 місяці тому +6

    GE 90's used in the 777 are almost twice as powerful, maybe the TF39 's were the most powerful in the late 1960's. Still an amazing airplane.

    • @robertlyon8876
      @robertlyon8876 Місяць тому +1

      Yes they are , I spent the last eight years of a very long career in the airlines on the 777.
      Those engines are incredible. The navy uses the same engine core to power their destroyers

    • @jjsifo1
      @jjsifo1 Місяць тому

      @@robertlyon8876 You made it, good for you ! I retired from a 25 year law enforcement Pilot career, maritime survellaillance ,caribbean sea.Flew an overweight special mission King Air B200T , it was fun.

    • @robertlyon8876
      @robertlyon8876 Місяць тому +1

      @@jjsifo1 Glad to be done , six years of retirement, just short of 45 years mostly long haul . I do miss the people I worked with , but I don’t miss the industry. IT’s unfortunately going woke .Cheers

    • @jjsifo1
      @jjsifo1 Місяць тому

      @@robertlyon8876 It is going woke, take care !

    • @artysanmobile
      @artysanmobile Місяць тому

      @@jjsifo1 Do you realize what a nitwit you sound like? Do you care?

  • @user-nl4eq9pd3y
    @user-nl4eq9pd3y 3 місяці тому +1

    The C-5M Super Galaxy is equipped with five sets of landing gear, 28 wheels, four General Electric CF6-80C2-L1F (F-138) commercial engines.

  • @anastasiamitsos5072
    @anastasiamitsos5072 8 місяців тому +4

    Super heavy power engines 👌!!! Amazing!!!

  • @VegasYouTuberSteve
    @VegasYouTuberSteve 3 місяці тому +2

    The A380 is a big plane.. Huge

  • @Clonefiles
    @Clonefiles 9 місяців тому +3

    Great Video

  • @unwoke1652
    @unwoke1652 4 місяці тому +1

    A veteran captain on 747 and A340-600, said that he typically pumped six metric tons of Jet A-1 through the 747's engines during the few seconds of reverse thrust. That's 1.5 metric tons per engine. Imagine what the fuel lines look like.

    • @vito774
      @vito774 3 місяці тому

      Sadly he lied to you…they don’t use 12000 lbs of fuel in the reverse phase.

  • @chrisdm79
    @chrisdm79 3 місяці тому +1

    Amazing peice of kit, well done America 🇬🇧🇺🇸

  • @saab340driver
    @saab340driver 9 місяців тому +2

    Love your videos, recent watcher from another heavy vehicle driver. Pat.

  • @georgesotiropoulos2738
    @georgesotiropoulos2738 8 місяців тому +1

    This is absolutely magnificent I've never seen a plane like this one before. 😃😀👍

  • @garymiller5937
    @garymiller5937 9 місяців тому +5

    Those are absolutely massive engines! 😮

    • @Timmy9937
      @Timmy9937 9 місяців тому +1

      Not compared to the GE9X

    • @zvast
      @zvast 8 місяців тому +1

      Nowadays just average!

    • @king_83227
      @king_83227 Місяць тому

      Of course they are.. They’re meant to produce thrust to what.. 200 tonnes of steel?

  • @simonsalamon8178
    @simonsalamon8178 8 місяців тому +2

    amazing!!!

  • @kerrycook2730
    @kerrycook2730 29 днів тому +1

    even God when seeing this great machine, asked himself is there a god greater then him? And as lightning and fire flashed across the universe the answer was yes G.E.

  • @richardbriansmith8562
    @richardbriansmith8562 8 місяців тому

    Awesome Video

  • @erichjeske
    @erichjeske 8 місяців тому +1

    Die C 5 Galaxy hat ein beindruckendes T-Leitwerk. Die Tragflächen, als Schulterdecker ausgeführt, sind richtig positioniert. Wenn man die Boeing 777 mit dem T-Leitwerk und
    die Triebwerke, wie bei der erfolgreichen 727, anordnen würde braucht man nur noch die Tragflächen um ein Segment nach hinten verschieben. Gehe davon aus, dass die
    tolle 777 bei gleicher Belastung und gleicher Betankung 800 km mehr Reichweite erreicht.

  • @martingruffalump5484
    @martingruffalump5484 4 місяці тому +1

    some dude PUSHING a breaker bar wrench - duh! - go round to other side and pull it - basic mechanics training from 60 years ago - so much is lost with time!! such a mighty machine!!😊😊😊

  • @rubiks6
    @rubiks6 4 місяці тому

    Wow.
    'nuff said.

  • @Johnny53kgb-nsa
    @Johnny53kgb-nsa 6 місяців тому +1

    At GE, quality, is job one! Opps, that's Ford. But these are some bad boy engines, made in America!

  • @bhalilu
    @bhalilu 8 місяців тому

    Those flock of birds on the tarmac welcoming the C5

  • @user-sj4vd6eq5t
    @user-sj4vd6eq5t Місяць тому +1

    Parece una Ballena flotando en el aire. Sehr beeindrucken, hammer.

  • @guya5352
    @guya5352 7 місяців тому +2

    Don't brag
    You are not the only one the world

  • @SSD99
    @SSD99 Місяць тому

    you are showing the GE CF6 engines on the C-5M Super Galaxy, but are describing the TF-39 of the C5A, C5B, and C5C (original) Galaxy.

  • @spaceace1006
    @spaceace1006 8 місяців тому +3

    Super High Bypass Turbofans!! It's kinda funny to realize that over 75% (or more) of the thrust comes from the bypass air and not so much the jet exhaust! Were these engines ever used on a commercial\civilian planes??

    • @davidmontierth8258
      @davidmontierth8258 3 місяці тому

      There is no "Super" category, that would be Ultra. However, these engines are only "High Bypass".

  • @steveandrushko75
    @steveandrushko75 3 місяці тому

    Great video O did enjoy it thanks!

  • @mannfan12
    @mannfan12 4 місяці тому +1

    Everytime the host mentions the TF-39 they show pictures of the CF6

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 7 місяців тому +2

    Boeing and GE, match made in heaven.

    • @gordonbryan8381
      @gordonbryan8381 4 місяці тому +1

      Might want to check your facts. The C-5 was built by Lockheed in Marietta.

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      The 1st commercial jet to use GE jet engines was the Convair 880. Then the 990 had GE fan engines with the fans in the rear.

    • @SurnaturalM
      @SurnaturalM Місяць тому

      It will send many to heaven for sure.

  • @jareddrogose1470
    @jareddrogose1470 Місяць тому +1

    Too bad there were only 5 orders filled recently. The C-5 is being discontinued and replaced by the C-17.

  • @sammencia7945
    @sammencia7945 9 місяців тому +8

    The GE90.
    There are rocket engines that have less thrust.

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      Rocket power plants operate on a different principle, the fast transfer of weight.

  • @gregjones7724
    @gregjones7724 9 місяців тому +7

    It’s 400 ton not “400 tons engines”.

  • @moacirguedes6048
    @moacirguedes6048 Місяць тому

    Maravilhoso !!

  • @shahedc514
    @shahedc514 7 місяців тому

    They love the word meticulous

  • @ariandyonis9986
    @ariandyonis9986 5 місяців тому +1

    Merci pour votre diction claire, distincte et sans accent. Ce qui me permet de suivre votre chaine en anglais.thank you so much,from France.

  • @fkchci681
    @fkchci681 9 місяців тому +1

    Reverse thrust? Impressive maybe but only 80% of forward thrust when using bypass engines.

  • @AnthonyMcInerney-vl5bf
    @AnthonyMcInerney-vl5bf Місяць тому

    TF-39s sound great.

  • @barryklinedinst6233
    @barryklinedinst6233 4 місяці тому

    Along with the flaps and brakes.

  • @billg7813
    @billg7813 Місяць тому

    Fighter pilot on escort mission to cargo pilot: “Hey watch this” and does a roll
    Cargo pilot says, “That was cool. Watch this” 5 minutes later he says, “What do you think of that?”
    Fighter pilot: “What did you do?”
    Cargo pilot: “Restroom break”

  • @Raul1971xxx
    @Raul1971xxx 3 місяці тому +1

    It looks to the Antonov An-225.

  • @Christopher-hx6xm
    @Christopher-hx6xm 3 місяці тому +1

    How much airlines could save by reverse thrust,No Push Back Needed

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      In San Diego once a pilot tried that on a commercial jet. It blew in the terminal's plate glass windows.

  • @geneticdisorder1900
    @geneticdisorder1900 9 місяців тому +3

    I know a guy that flew this beast during his AF career. One of his flights consisted of taking the NR-1 submarine across the country from Virginia to Commiefornia or someplace like that.

  • @artonieminen1873
    @artonieminen1873 4 місяці тому +1

    What is about General Electric GE90. I think C-5 engine are nowadays quite old fashioned

    • @jjsifo1
      @jjsifo1 4 місяці тому

      C5A is an old Airplane but still impressive, yes GE90 and G9X are the most powerful today.

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      Yes. Lockheed built the C-141 that was designed by Convair. Lockheed then used that same windshield and flight deck design for the C-5. And Convair did that engineering when Kennedy was president.

  • @ezekielmajor5511
    @ezekielmajor5511 3 місяці тому

    Surprised they don't put for GENX's on the C5s.

  • @DCS_World_Japan
    @DCS_World_Japan 9 місяців тому +2

    If they can make 400 tons fly then of course they could stop the same 400 ton object....

    • @tomsamuelson8512
      @tomsamuelson8512 8 місяців тому

      The wheel brakes help stop the plane more then the engines do....

  • @Samantha-xy4ed
    @Samantha-xy4ed 9 місяців тому +1

    Put some handles on the fuselage so the Afghans don't fall off

    • @C-man553
      @C-man553 8 місяців тому +1

      LOL …forgive me lord.

  • @user-mp9rd4hg8b
    @user-mp9rd4hg8b 4 місяці тому +1

    If they tried to stop this for hundred ton plane using only reverse thrusters, they would run off the end of the runway. Every time.

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      They don't have thrusters. That is movie talk. They have thrust reversers. And these are so good that the A-380 only has thrust reversers on the inboard engines. Of course, they certainly also use big brakes.

    • @user-mp9rd4hg8b
      @user-mp9rd4hg8b Місяць тому

      @@danielocarey9392 yeah yeah yeah. And it's phasers that they don't have. Phasers

  • @Netlife-001
    @Netlife-001 27 днів тому

    is that the model they were hanging off at Kabul airport?

  • @Philc231
    @Philc231 Місяць тому

    Do they even fly the c5 anymore ?

  • @antonysmyth2464
    @antonysmyth2464 9 місяців тому +10

    Too much hype for me in the script and vioce-over style. All not needed, the kit speaks for itself.

    • @flemch6136
      @flemch6136 9 місяців тому +5

      Yeah, every little detail is described as massive and awe inspiring. It makes it less awe inspiring if you keep saying that for everything.

    • @inuliger
      @inuliger 9 місяців тому +4

      The script sucks, for sure.

    • @C-man553
      @C-man553 8 місяців тому

      Available in kit form?

  • @davidkellymitchell4747
    @davidkellymitchell4747 3 місяці тому

    I use to work for Generous Electric.

  • @jacksonmarshallkramer5087
    @jacksonmarshallkramer5087 2 місяці тому

    Somehow, I thought this was going to be about jet engines. I was wrong.

  • @rhoefferle
    @rhoefferle 9 місяців тому +11

    So the engines are so powerful they can stop the plane? Who’s the dope that came up with that caption?

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      Well, know that the clamshell doors cannot redirect all the thrust to the front. So stopping them can be a challenge. However, the A-380 only uses reverse thrust on the inboard engines. And brakes and tires do the rest of the stopping.

  • @pesawatindonesia
    @pesawatindonesia 9 місяців тому

    hello from SOC/WAHQ mister 😍😍😍

  • @jacksonmarshallkramer5087
    @jacksonmarshallkramer5087 3 місяці тому

    The MAX8 is the one that flies into the ground.

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave 7 місяців тому

    Everything is great, until an airline mechanic makes mistakes servicing it.

  • @jacksonmarshallkramer5087
    @jacksonmarshallkramer5087 3 місяці тому +1

    Boeing offers so many extra features in their planes, these days. 😁

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      Possibly. But they need to return to cables for flight controls. If hydraulics or batteries fail, the pilots can still control the aircraft with more effort. But Boeing is often the lowest bidder. And to be this, they must compromise safety. And they do. The DC-8, 880 and 990 had 3-wing spars for safety. Boeing just had 2 to save money. The Convairs had separate pressurized hatches for hydraulic pumps than in the wheel wells. Boeing did not. So, if a 707 put up the wheels while one tire was hot, it could sever hydraulic lines, bringing down the airplane.

  • @Anders87mod
    @Anders87mod Місяць тому

    Is it Possible for a C5 to land on A CVN?

  • @Cartcheung
    @Cartcheung 8 місяців тому

    I know how to transfer the heavy duty engines steadily and smoothly

  • @AugustKling
    @AugustKling 4 місяці тому

    GE and A380? It was not a match!

  • @MuhammadDaudkhanTV100
    @MuhammadDaudkhanTV100 3 місяці тому

    MashaAllah

  • @user-vd4ez7sc5v
    @user-vd4ez7sc5v Місяць тому

    Yeah but Wilbur can the damn thing fly?

  • @rajus6270
    @rajus6270 8 місяців тому +1

    Vanakkam,Super very very good, Jai Hind

  • @sabbavarapuvalerian-wb1ik
    @sabbavarapuvalerian-wb1ik Місяць тому

    👍👍👍

  • @paulcloutier2890
    @paulcloutier2890 Місяць тому

    Hilarious....you're talking about TF-39 engines but these are the new military version of the commercial CF-6.

  • @trevorreynolds6330
    @trevorreynolds6330 3 місяці тому +1

    This is rather unerwhelming. Here we are talkining up these engine like they are the next bing thing. But they are far from that. These engines are/were widely used in commercial avaition. So reverse thrust stopping power has been a thing for quite a while. Also the power plants here only put out 43,000Lb--f each The Airbus A380 and Boeing 777 which use either the GP7270 or the Rollys Royce Trent 900 which produces 81,500Lb-f of thurst each. Even the newer A350 using the Rolls Royce XWB-84 engine produces 84,200Lb-f of thrust but has an option to go up to the XWB-97 for a massive 97,000Lb-f. Still the C-5 Galaxy is an amazing plane and back in the 70's it was for sure ahead of its time.

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      Well, the video got you to watch it by speaking of thrust reversing on the C-5A. But that was only to get you to watch it. But know that the A-380 only has thrust reversing on the inboard engines. Interesting isn't it. I imagine their brakes are pretty awesome.

  • @lonerider262
    @lonerider262 7 місяців тому

    Antonovs baby boy

  • @dissyduster
    @dissyduster 4 місяці тому +2

    would have been nice to hear it insted of all BS talking over it,,

  • @medievalmusiclover
    @medievalmusiclover Місяць тому +1

    My respect for G.E technology.
    ✝️🇺🇲✝️🇺🇲🇮🇱✡️ ✈️✈️✈️

  • @alphago410
    @alphago410 5 місяців тому +2

    Antonov AN-124가 더 크지요

  • @HesJustSteven
    @HesJustSteven 8 місяців тому

    Buran was not a Space Shuttle, if we’re using NASA terminology

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      The Buron was flown once into space, and without people in it. But it was designed for cosmonauts to be inside for space flights, I understand.

  • @jacksonmarshallkramer5087
    @jacksonmarshallkramer5087 3 місяці тому

    The Boeing 777. Now, is that the one that flies itself into the ground, bursts into flames because of its' batteries, or sheds doors in flight??

  • @peronotec.7445
    @peronotec.7445 Місяць тому

    Ay 🙈 your macho machine 😂

  • @clqudy4750
    @clqudy4750 Місяць тому

    Too bad GE doesn't make their PTAC units with this level of 'quality and engineering excellence' Lol

  • @benjaminrobinson3997
    @benjaminrobinson3997 4 місяці тому

    Why don’t they try to GE 9X engines are more powerful than all four on the C5. Check the thrust ratio.

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      Aircraft are basically designed around the engines. Because of things like weight and clearances a new engine design usually isn't installed on planes they were not designed for.

  • @pranititiwari6525
    @pranititiwari6525 3 місяці тому

    🙏🙏👍🎉

  • @brettpatetto6847
    @brettpatetto6847 Місяць тому

    A 787 out powers that. and RR plants witch where intentionally made w/ additional power. It would be 2 = 1 787 takes her lead.

  • @bn9334
    @bn9334 3 місяці тому

    What is that background music from 3:46 to 5:44?

  • @user-du1mz5zx7s
    @user-du1mz5zx7s 3 місяці тому

    They also pollute like mad😏cough! cough!

  • @telkoehf175
    @telkoehf175 Місяць тому

    The fan blade have wrong angel

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      Many designs today have a sweeping angular change from spool to tip.

  • @rixxy9204
    @rixxy9204 Місяць тому +1

    Nothing compared the GE-90.

  • @GregSr
    @GregSr 9 місяців тому +58

    How much did GE pay for this commercial?

    • @inuliger
      @inuliger 9 місяців тому +4

      Indeed. The script is not heavy on actual technical details, it’s too fluffy.

    • @geejackson2312
      @geejackson2312 9 місяців тому +2

      Someone got a kickback lol

    • @SteveStowell
      @SteveStowell 9 місяців тому

      Nothing

    • @markmcfarland1433
      @markmcfarland1433 8 місяців тому

      I’d say $100k

    • @jwmcclanahan4690
      @jwmcclanahan4690 8 місяців тому +3

      Be thankful that we have such wonderful Engering

  • @user-qj9pp7gd1e
    @user-qj9pp7gd1e 8 місяців тому +1

    Not good : A lot of grandiose talk and no technical details about the subject ...

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      I know. It was kind of introductory. Oh well. I liked it anyway.

    • @SurnaturalM
      @SurnaturalM Місяць тому

      This is made by American for American consumers. Of course it will be grandiose talk and few technical details.

  • @gregbraum7330
    @gregbraum7330 3 місяці тому +8

    An annoying sales pitch

  • @satharauv5555
    @satharauv5555 Місяць тому

  • @ing.pacolh7458
    @ing.pacolh7458 Місяць тому

    It's too expensive to be used on the ground

  • @adityabadukale6353
    @adityabadukale6353 Місяць тому +1

    U guys’ delivery is sooooo damn slow, I’m generally am a patient guy but this is just way to mush pause.

  • @jeffrowlan9877
    @jeffrowlan9877 Місяць тому

    i wanted to hear about the engines not the aircraft!!

  • @Wongwanchungwongjumbo
    @Wongwanchungwongjumbo 9 місяців тому

    This GE Engines has evolved tp power the latest Airliners and Galaxy Heavy lifter C-5M type and Boeing 777-X Aircraft.
    The Boeing 777-300ER is Only Aircraft operates the Sole GE90-115 Turbofan Engines and Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner Aircraft.

  • @paulcharles7627
    @paulcharles7627 3 місяці тому

    Yes but whose to get the credit.
    God Almighty or Mankind?
    I choose God Almighty.😅😅😅

    • @danielocarey9392
      @danielocarey9392 Місяць тому

      God certainly gave GE and others the materials and intelligence for these great feats. But we can hear who listened to God to build thee great airplanes and their engines.

  • @keyizhang7255
    @keyizhang7255 9 місяців тому

    niubility