I know everyone says this, but Jerry's recaps really are the best out there. I'm an ~1700 ELO player, and I could never appreciate the depth of moves these players consider. Jerry is so thorough in explaining why players DIDNT play certain moves, or what they must have been considering, which is just so informative to the audience. Keep up the great work Jerry!
He has many good qualities that make him the best. He goes quite in-depth when others just breeze over some moves. In such games, a 20minute video is the minimum required to cover the game in any decent way. Also, he speaks very clearly and you can understand exactly what is said. Others, who are not english-native, are not as fluent and thus is harder to understand sometimes. And another thing that is more subtle is the tone of his voice; in a game like chess, it's important to allow the viewers to "immerse" in the game. His calm tone makes it much easier to concetrate on the game and receive and analyze all the information more thoroughly.
Jerry I’ve watched other recaps but yours clearly much better than all the others in pointing out concrete considerations (with variations) that lurked at every stage of this game just below the surface. Like the repetition forced by the 2 move mate if Black at the end moved up to h6. Well done indeed! Thank you! Some of the other channels are criticizing Ding for being to eager to make a draw but all things considered seems thank you he was right to do so & played well in not letting himself get lured into an unclear doubled edged middle game position.
Thanks Jerry for excellent analysis. So much better than plenty out there ! Nk wonder, I keep coming to your WCC videos starting from 2010. Dear viewers, Jerry does an awesome job, please like and share with your friends. Jerry's videos are insightful and respectful. No swear words, no tantrums, no insults...just nice commentary in a dignified way. Let's make Jerry hit 1 mil mark🙌🙌🙌
About 6 years ago I randomly watched a chess video from ChessNetwork. I watched the recaps, the scholar mate video, and the classic fishing pole trap. Eventually I got the courage to play others online and I’ve had so much fun (and frustration lol). I played to destress in undergrad and then veterinary school. And when I move I plan on joining a chess club. I just wanted to thank Jerry for introducing me to this game and the relationships I’ve made because of it!
Quote from my girlfriend: “that chess guy you watch sounds like Tina from Bob’s Burgers”. Been watching Jerry for 10 years and I can’t unhear it now. Thanks a lot babe.
Major Piece endings tend, for me, to be brutal and technical (a personal weakness). But this game definitely was engaging. At first, with Gukesh stubbornly refusing a Queen exchange - and subsequently refusing a Draw, I thought Ding would push Black’s Queen around until he leveraged a win. As you said, Jerry, an valiant and tough struggle.
More ambitious than Black is probably 3....c5 instead of e6 with the idea 4.Nf3 - Nc6, 5.c3 - Qb6 after which 6.Qb3 would already be an inaccuracy because of 6....c4. This is just for the spectators, Ding would have known this of course. But at least grandmasters have also played like this with White...
Is it just me or does Ding seem a little unambitious in this match? I was excited after his win as black in game 1. But here he trades so many pieces away and offers an early 3-fold repetition. And the previous game as white was much the same. It's as if his objective is to draw even as white. Could be way off but that's what it seems like to me. Maybe he's saving his energy for the later rounds or something.
Was there nothing around 13:58 with Qc3 check and then if the rook blocks you pick up the pawn on a3? What am I missing that doesn't take opportunity to snag 2 pawns and destroy the queen side. You're even threatening mate if you block with the rook and queen takes the pawn on a3.
I have always been an immense and unconditional fan of you. I have been watching your streams almost from the beginning and watch almost all of them. I hardly skip one. But now youhave surrendered to the toxic corrupt power I will leave you. I will stop watching your vids. I cannot describe how disappointed I am in you. This is something I never would have expected. But anyway, money is always prioritised above integrity. I had hope you would be different. Naive. Do you have any clue about the workings of Google and its corrupted ways of operating and its abuse of market dominance? Wake up, and choose integrity instead of some minor sponsor revenues. Do not let Google affiliate itself with a beautiful channel as yours. It is using you to whitwash itself, don't you recognise that?
@@legatemichael No, they mean Garry Kasparov. Garry popularised the game of chess during the 80s and 90s, influencing young players to take-up chess. It is most probably a direct result of his legacy that Gukesh and Ding are playing this match and Jerry is here to comment on it. So thank you Garry. 😁
@@kamilhorvat8290a decisive outcome indicates one of the players messed something up, but a draw doesn't necessarily mean neither player did. it doesn't work in both directions. Carlsen's match against Caruana (all draws in the classical portion) was probably the most accurate ever, but quite a few games in his match against Karjakin - 10 draws - weren't of stellar quality. a draw doesn't always result from perfect play - the errors of both players may cancel eachother out. Carlsen's opponents also tended to play extra cautiously against him ("Magnus effect"), trying to avoid risks, and even Carlsen often can't do much against such an approach at the highest level.
This is a combative game. Let's applaud a 18 yr old kid taking risks. People are forgetting Gukesh is just a kid...with experience he will become even deadly. Also, Ding is just stabilizing mentally. So, let's appreciate him.that he is putting it a good mental fight. I applaud these players and respect them. Many are trying to undermine these players which is sad.
World Chess Championship 2024 (Ding Liren vs Gukesh D)
ua-cam.com/play/PLQsLDm9Rq9bGj5EHpnnc4yN_dFHJ4Zn5X.html
I know everyone says this, but Jerry's recaps really are the best out there. I'm an ~1700 ELO player, and I could never appreciate the depth of moves these players consider. Jerry is so thorough in explaining why players DIDNT play certain moves, or what they must have been considering, which is just so informative to the audience. Keep up the great work Jerry!
How to become fide member sir
He has many good qualities that make him the best. He goes quite in-depth when others just breeze over some moves. In such games, a 20minute video is the minimum required to cover the game in any decent way. Also, he speaks very clearly and you can understand exactly what is said. Others, who are not english-native, are not as fluent and thus is harder to understand sometimes. And another thing that is more subtle is the tone of his voice; in a game like chess, it's important to allow the viewers to "immerse" in the game. His calm tone makes it much easier to concetrate on the game and receive and analyze all the information more thoroughly.
Jerry I’ve watched other recaps but yours clearly much better than all the others in pointing out concrete considerations (with variations) that lurked at every stage of this game just below the surface. Like the repetition forced by the 2 move mate if Black at the end moved up to h6. Well done indeed! Thank you! Some of the other channels are criticizing Ding for being to eager to make a draw but all things considered seems thank you he was right to do so & played well in not letting himself get lured into an unclear doubled edged middle game position.
Thanks Jerry for excellent analysis. So much better than plenty out there ! Nk wonder, I keep coming to your WCC videos starting from 2010.
Dear viewers, Jerry does an awesome job, please like and share with your friends. Jerry's videos are insightful and respectful. No swear words, no tantrums, no insults...just nice commentary in a dignified way.
Let's make Jerry hit 1 mil mark🙌🙌🙌
One of my favorite games I've seen broken down with such a volatile mid to endgame. Super interesting to hear Jerry detail all the potential pitfalls!
The h5 advance was truly a stellar move
I always wait for your analysis. You show other possible consideration which also looks resonable... but you reveal their drawbacks.
Yesss Jerry!!! Love your videos.
👍
Finally a video above 20 mts in this world championship recap from Jerry. Thanks for your amazing work !!
Thx Jerry 😊
Thanks Jerry!
Thank you for the nice analysis Jerry!
Here as always. Great recap. They are too good.
On the edge of my seat throughout this game.
Lucid analysis, man. Thanks for showing
👍
High quality chess and high quality recap. Thank you Jerry 🙌
Thanks 👍
fun game, like the analysis
Looking forward to this recap
Hi Jerry, it's everyone!
Give awa man, give yr head a shake !!!!!!! 😂😂😂
This comment is getting really boring
@@mukund7898nah nah nah 7th time is a charm, I'm gonna post it on the next video
This had become cringe now 😂😂
Great game!
About 6 years ago I randomly watched a chess video from ChessNetwork. I watched the recaps, the scholar mate video, and the classic fishing pole trap. Eventually I got the courage to play others online and I’ve had so much fun (and frustration lol). I played to destress in undergrad and then veterinary school. And when I move I plan on joining a chess club. I just wanted to thank Jerry for introducing me to this game and the relationships I’ve made because of it!
Thank you for sharing your story. Glad you found the channel. “How I got hooked on chess in part by a fishing pole.” 😎
Very good analysis.. thanks
👍
Quote from my girlfriend: “that chess guy you watch sounds like Tina from Bob’s Burgers”.
Been watching Jerry for 10 years and I can’t unhear it now. Thanks a lot babe.
I thought Tina was imitating Jerry! Makes more sense to me :^)
Great analysis. Fun and exciting recap!
love that bleep. upon hearing it. you just know something good comes... thanks big jer~!
thank you Jerry
Major Piece endings tend, for me, to be brutal and technical (a personal weakness). But this game definitely was engaging. At first, with Gukesh stubbornly refusing a Queen exchange - and subsequently refusing a Draw, I thought Ding would push Black’s Queen around until he leveraged a win.
As you said, Jerry, an valiant and tough struggle.
Excelente!+
Thank you 👍
Good fight. Thanks, Jerry.
sounds soothing!
Best analysis ever
I miss Carlsen never agreeing to a draw in such positions.
Great as always Jerry
Best commentary!
Thanks to Jerry for saving me 4 hours.
Ty Jerry
Hi Jerry. Well analyzed, good buddy
Thank you Colin. 👍
thanks Jerry
Wow, they're really slipping as the match progresses! They both had 7 centipawn losses vs only 5 in earlier games /s
Pretty good game.
JERRYYYY
WE DEMAND BLOOD!
Just kidding. Great analysis as always. Thanks!
More ambitious than Black is probably 3....c5 instead of e6 with the idea 4.Nf3 - Nc6, 5.c3 - Qb6 after which 6.Qb3 would already be an inaccuracy because of 6....c4. This is just for the spectators, Ding would have known this of course. But at least grandmasters have also played like this with White...
Kinda Stockding vs. Stockkesh :D
Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!
Is it just me or does Ding seem a little unambitious in this match? I was excited after his win as black in game 1. But here he trades so many pieces away and offers an early 3-fold repetition. And the previous game as white was much the same. It's as if his objective is to draw even as white. Could be way off but that's what it seems like to me. Maybe he's saving his energy for the later rounds or something.
swaggg
Hi, Jerry.
draw again?
Was there nothing around 13:58 with Qc3 check and then if the rook blocks you pick up the pawn on a3? What am I missing that doesn't take opportunity to snag 2 pawns and destroy the queen side. You're even threatening mate if you block with the rook and queen takes the pawn on a3.
Ding Liren...? Where's Grogu...?
:)
Pigs and bugs.
I miss the evaluation bar
I have always been an immense and unconditional fan of you. I have been watching your streams almost from the beginning and watch almost all of them. I hardly skip one. But now youhave surrendered to the toxic corrupt power I will leave you. I will stop watching your vids. I cannot describe how disappointed I am in you. This is something I never would have expected. But anyway, money is always prioritised above integrity. I had hope you would be different. Naive. Do you have any clue about the workings of Google and its corrupted ways of operating and its abuse of market dominance? Wake up, and choose integrity instead of some minor sponsor revenues. Do not let Google affiliate itself with a beautiful channel as yours. It is using you to whitwash itself, don't you recognise that?
I’m not being sponsored by Google. I wrote a short message on the right in the beginning of the Game 2 video.
First. Amazing video, thanks Gary ❤
You do mean Jerry right ? 😅
@@legatemichael No, they mean Garry Kasparov. Garry popularised the game of chess during the 80s and 90s, influencing young players to take-up chess. It is most probably a direct result of his legacy that Gukesh and Ding are playing this match and Jerry is here to comment on it. So thank you Garry. 😁
@@legatemichael Many people have been wrongfully calling him Gary the last year or such so it has become a thing in the comment section 😉
@@Entheos84 lol. I didn't know that . I guess since it has been Jerry to me for 14 years now.
@@legatemichael Haha. Wow! 14 years is impressive :D
I have been watching for 6 years so I am getting there :)
Jerry do you think the quality of play is better with Magnus as champ ?
Isn't that obvious? Just look at how many decisive games in classic time format were there when Magnus was playing.
@ is your name Jerry ?
@@kamilhorvat8290a decisive outcome indicates one of the players messed something up, but a draw doesn't necessarily mean neither player did. it doesn't work in both directions. Carlsen's match against Caruana (all draws in the classical portion) was probably the most accurate ever, but quite a few games in his match against Karjakin - 10 draws - weren't of stellar quality. a draw doesn't always result from perfect play - the errors of both players may cancel eachother out. Carlsen's opponents also tended to play extra cautiously against him ("Magnus effect"), trying to avoid risks, and even Carlsen often can't do much against such an approach at the highest level.
Carlsen-Caruana 12 consecutive draw snooze fest
This is a combative game. Let's applaud a 18 yr old kid taking risks. People are forgetting Gukesh is just a kid...with experience he will become even deadly.
Also, Ding is just stabilizing mentally. So, let's appreciate him.that he is putting it a good mental fight.
I applaud these players and respect them. Many are trying to undermine these players which is sad.
To.many ties
No guts- no glory !!!
Those two guys are only throwing dirt.