i wish i'd fit into the sokito scudetta. but it's probably just too slim for me. im sat here waiting for the alpha 2 which "comes out some time in december" :D
Hi, Boot Wizard. I tried Mecurial Vapor Elites, but, although I have narrow feet, my feet are slim, so the upper had excess material & felt a “bubbly” if that makes sense. (I’m guess that’s what you refer to as (higher) “volume”?) If so, can you please make a video on footballs with the lowest volume?
Great list. Have been following and enjoying your videos for a few months now. It would be helpful, if you could divide your videos into sections (ex. “Top 3 Speed Boot 2024” - don’t have to name the boots) just for a better overview. Thanks, happy new year and keep up the good work!
Not sure I know what you mean? You want a marker for each boot? For example 5 4 3 2 1 etc? If so, yes, it's something I sometimes do, however, in this instance the reason it's not there is because people simply skip to the marker point, see what the boot is and then skip to the next one. This is incredibly damaging for both the information that I'm giving and also for the video performance on UA-cam. Thanks for the support and happy new year to you too.
Yes, that’s what I meant. Okay, didn’t know that you decided to not do this on purpose. I personally would skip a few parts, but still watch parts of the video. Instead I sometimes see myself avoiding the whole video due to the non-presence markers. Would be interesting to know, if there is a difference in the views and analytics depending on the presence of markers. Thanks for the insight!
@@ryans.2147 there is, I have analytics on an absolute tonne of videos both with and without markers and can track exactly what people on average are watching. The presence of markers creates spikes at the marker points followed by drop offs and an overall reduction in the percentage of the video viewed by between 5 and 10% which is massive for audience retention. If the audience retention is seen as poor then UA-cam won't push the video out to more people. This is most prevalent with list videos. Unfortunately there is on the whole a lack of respect for the time and effort that goes into making reviews particularly, both these list styles and full reviews because people simply would rather skip to an overall score out of 10 for example and then click off the video. This doesn't help the person viewing the content as there is no context and it doesn't help the person making the review, i.e. me because UA-cam sees that as a poor video and limits it's reach. My grip sock videos are an excellent example where frequently people won't even watch the video they either skip to the ranking or I have a lot of people asking if I can just put all the top ranked socks in a comment. Essentially so they don't have to watch the videos to find out. On the one hand I have no problem providing people the information that they want quickly, but on the other hand when it takes me hours and hours to test the products and create the content simply for it to be bypassed and in turn it's reach limited then I'm not really willing to do it, especially when a video is usually 10 minutes maximum. If the videos were very long I'd understand, for example I have a grip socks ranking video I'm working on that will likely be up to an hour long, I'll add a marker there for every single sock so people can find the info they want on a particular sock and use it like a search engine for example.
Very good list, I really need to try both the Furon and the new Ultra. Number 1 is no surprise!
Which do you prefer, the scudetta or the speedflow?
Good question, speed flow outsole on the Scudetta would be great.
Bought the Furons with the HG sole. Its great!
Really great
Really want to try those
i wish i'd fit into the sokito scudetta. but it's probably just too slim for me. im sat here waiting for the alpha 2 which "comes out some time in december" :D
You can order them, just can't guarantee you'll get them 😂😂
I knew it was the scudetta before my eyes even saw the thumbnail 😂
And there's no Scudetta on the thumbnail 😂
@ all it took was “speed”!
To be fair I’m really considering the boot given reviews from you guys, Noah ect. 💁🏻♂️
@@RushStriker9 hope you like them
Shout out to the Razor
It was an honorable mention for my most underrated
Hi, Boot Wizard. I tried Mecurial Vapor Elites, but, although I have narrow feet, my feet are slim, so the upper had excess material & felt a “bubbly” if that makes sense. (I’m guess that’s what you refer to as (higher) “volume”?) If so, can you please make a video on footballs with the lowest volume?
It probably not something I'll make a whole video on but most videos I make I do reference volume in sizing where relevant
@ ok. Which boot do you think has the lowest volume?
F50, Alpha, Scudetta. Tiempo 10 is also very low volume.
New balance furon is the best🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Great boot. Big fan.
How much does the Messi f50 weigh
Around 200g obviously depends on the size.
@ what size did u get and how much does they weigh
Great list. Have been following and enjoying your videos for a few months now. It would be helpful, if you could divide your videos into sections (ex. “Top 3 Speed Boot 2024” - don’t have to name the boots) just for a better overview. Thanks, happy new year and keep up the good work!
Not sure I know what you mean? You want a marker for each boot? For example 5 4 3 2 1 etc?
If so, yes, it's something I sometimes do, however, in this instance the reason it's not there is because people simply skip to the marker point, see what the boot is and then skip to the next one. This is incredibly damaging for both the information that I'm giving and also for the video performance on UA-cam.
Thanks for the support and happy new year to you too.
Yes, that’s what I meant. Okay, didn’t know that you decided to not do this on purpose.
I personally would skip a few parts, but still watch parts of the video. Instead I sometimes see myself avoiding the whole video due to the non-presence markers.
Would be interesting to know, if there is a difference in the views and analytics depending on the presence of markers. Thanks for the insight!
@@ryans.2147 there is, I have analytics on an absolute tonne of videos both with and without markers and can track exactly what people on average are watching.
The presence of markers creates spikes at the marker points followed by drop offs and an overall reduction in the percentage of the video viewed by between 5 and 10% which is massive for audience retention. If the audience retention is seen as poor then UA-cam won't push the video out to more people. This is most prevalent with list videos.
Unfortunately there is on the whole a lack of respect for the time and effort that goes into making reviews particularly, both these list styles and full reviews because people simply would rather skip to an overall score out of 10 for example and then click off the video. This doesn't help the person viewing the content as there is no context and it doesn't help the person making the review, i.e. me because UA-cam sees that as a poor video and limits it's reach.
My grip sock videos are an excellent example where frequently people won't even watch the video they either skip to the ranking or I have a lot of people asking if I can just put all the top ranked socks in a comment. Essentially so they don't have to watch the videos to find out.
On the one hand I have no problem providing people the information that they want quickly, but on the other hand when it takes me hours and hours to test the products and create the content simply for it to be bypassed and in turn it's reach limited then I'm not really willing to do it, especially when a video is usually 10 minutes maximum. If the videos were very long I'd understand, for example I have a grip socks ranking video I'm working on that will likely be up to an hour long, I'll add a marker there for every single sock so people can find the info they want on a particular sock and use it like a search engine for example.
It's not 2024, It's 2025😅
And yet this is a list of the best speed boots that came out in 2024! CRAZY! 🤪