Lee Harvey Oswald in Dallas Police Department

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024
  • The arrest of Lee Harvey Oswald. The hallways were swarming with reporters and cameramen as Oswald was being led from room to room at Dallas Police Headquarters.
    November 22-23, 1963, Dallas, Texas. Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,8 тис.

  • @donf3877
    @donf3877 3 роки тому +196

    For the questioning of the most important suspect, in the most important murder... there was NO tape recording device in the room, NO stenographer present, NO notes taken, and the suspect was denied his right to legal representation which he had requested live on the air. So... besides the fact the only "record" of what was said during those 12 hours is literally word of mouth from the investigator himself, anything learned in the questioning would not have been admissible in court. Makes you wonder what the actual purpose of 12 hour of questioning was other than showing the public they were going through the motions, because it served no legal purpose whatsoever. Oh and... if you check at 0:43 of this video, you will see Jack Ruby was in the crowd. He was there to take Oswald out before it got any further, but he couldn't get close enough. Ruby was also present in the police station each and every time Oswald was brought out in public. He just didn't get the chance to get close enough to kill Oswald until he was being transferred.
    Oswald had been arrested for killing the police officer. Yes, there were 38 caliber casings found at the murder scene. And yes, he had a 38 on him when he was arrested. So case closed... Oswald killed the officer. The problem is, police records state the casings found at the scene were from a 38 automatic, which eject each time the gun is fired. It is stamped right on the casing. Oswald had a 38 revolver. You CANNOT fire a round for a 38 automatic out of a 38 revolver. The only evidence linking Oswald to the killing of the officer is totally bogus. So who actually killed the officer??? We will never know.
    We will also never know who actually killed the president. One thing I can tell you. The round that blew half of Kennedy's head off came from the front a split second after a round hit him in the head from behind. The round from the rear was a standard rifle round that passed through, hence the blood spray to the front. The round that took half his head off was from a very high powered rifle, probably a 30.06 or 30.30, and it was a frangible round designed to disintegrated (explode) on contact. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a standard rifle round to do the amount of damage that was done to Kennedy's head. They are designed to pass right through in one piece, just like the "magic" bullet found at the hospital.
    The witnesses only heard three shots. I guess no one has ever heard of a silencer??!! Rounds hit the inside of the windshield frame and the windshield itself of the limo, the pavement, the grass, and even the curb all the way down at the triple overpass. There were a hell of a lot more than just three shots, and more than one shooter. There had to be. Evidence proves this out, and even the government's second investigation concluded there was more than one shooter. Who was behind it, and who planned it, and who carried it out... who knows. I can tell you this. When the police investigate a murder, their chief suspect is the person that had the most to gain from the death. LBJ hated the Kennedys... all of them. He knew JFK did not want him as a running mate in 1960. The powers in charge of the Democratic Party insisted because they felt the voters would want someone older with more political experience with the young Kennedy. And JFK held LBJ back as Vice President, not allowing him any power at all. LBJ also knew they were planning on dropping him off the ticket as Vice President in 1964. That would have left him disgraced, and with no political power whatsoever. Plus, he knew Bobby was behind the investigations into his illegal activities when he was a senator. When JFK died, LBJ became the President of the United States, and he made sure to castrate Bobby so all the investigations (plural) into his unsavory actions as a senator were stopped. LBJ certainly gained from Kennedy's assassination. Did he plan it, doubtful. Was he in on it? According to his mistress he knew, at the least the day before it happened, about the plan to assassinate Kennedy. He also hit the floor of his limo at least two seconds BEFORE the first shot. So he knew about the assassination... and when and where it would take place.
    Another force that gained from the assassination was the CIA. After the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy was going to dismantle the CIA (the CIA had already tried to assassinate Castro seventeen times... so they were pretty good at the planning phase anyway). And, he was going to pull our troops out of Nam. Under LBJ, the CIA became even more powerful. And we all know what happened in Nam under LBJ.

    • @WQQKIE
      @WQQKIE 2 роки тому +25

      Excellent theory, I am glad I am not the only one!

    • @Jim-mn7yq
      @Jim-mn7yq 2 роки тому +4

      I tend to agree with you on a number of these issues, but you state the following, "The problem is, police records state the casings found at the scene were from a 38 automatic, which eject each time the gun is fired." I think you mean semi-automatic, not automatic, since they're not sold in the US. And your claim that there is some kind of stamping on the casing for use specifically in a semi-automatic. As far as I know, that's not the case.

    • @donf3877
      @donf3877 2 роки тому +8

      @@Jim-mn7yq There is a photo, along with the police report. In the photo of the shell casing, the ".38AUTO" is visible and easy to read. We are, after all, talking about almost 60 years ago... but yes, I can't figure the reason for it being stamped either. Anyone that knows anything about handguns, KNOWS the difference. It is VERY obvious. But, the ".38AUTO" IS there. And, it is on the SIDE of the casing. All my ammo is stamped... but it is around the cap... not on the side. And yes, I did mean semi-auto.

    • @rorymoore4387
      @rorymoore4387 2 роки тому +12

      Lol I like your statement that there were .38 casings and Oswald had a .38 on him case closed.
      It was texas lots of people own .38 revolvers especially back then. Police themselves on average use .38 revolver as the service weapon being of choice or policy as they are extremely reiable and efficient.
      So by their own logic anyone of them could have shot the officer and with everything about this case it wouldn't surprise me if it was.
      I didn't catch the stamping on the shell casing I'll look that up but that aside, the LBJ connection is something I never heard but stands to reason when you look at who stands to gain point of view, and if that is the case it wouldnt surprise me if gov was involved as Kennedy was do alot of toe stepping.
      So alot of people in power had a vested interest I'm a Kennedy free White House. He was changing everything and change makes people nervous especially powerful people who dont want to give up that power.

    • @rorymoore4387
      @rorymoore4387 2 роки тому +6

      You could also add unless reloading revolvers don't leave spent casings behind. So its weird if there were casings at the scene, unless he stopped to reload which a person fleeing assassinating the president would be into much of a hurry for.

  • @TopTributeBands-N-Stuff
    @TopTributeBands-N-Stuff 9 років тому +165

    This is the longest footage I have seen and I am in my mid 60s. Thanks for getting and posting this stuff.

    • @wavydavy9816
      @wavydavy9816 4 роки тому +4

      But doesn't that say it all eh?

    • @AA-ke5cu
      @AA-ke5cu 2 роки тому

      Comments that fail to post because they can't handle the truth of a corrupt govt. This is how the truth is being hidden now.

    • @darrelskaggs9057
      @darrelskaggs9057 Рік тому

      I agree.

    • @Louis-qi1gz
      @Louis-qi1gz Рік тому

      My mom was watching this live on TV

    • @lorddiosliving
      @lorddiosliving Рік тому

      So you never saw this recopilation of Oswald videos ever before??...

  • @Bbendfender
    @Bbendfender Рік тому +191

    How did the police and reporters know so much about Oswald's past in such a very short time.

    • @tpryce6243
      @tpryce6243 Рік тому +31

      A bunch of people who know how to obtain information found the information they were looking for.
      Really not that hard to understand.

    • @redcat608
      @redcat608 Рік тому +49

      @@tpryce6243 in that era? Shit homey, the Internet wasn’t around yet…

    • @tpryce6243
      @tpryce6243 Рік тому +14

      @@redcat608 Yeah, how did anyone find information before the internet??

    • @JasonCrombie
      @JasonCrombie Рік тому

      He was a person of interest after seeking Russian citizenship. The FBI were watching him and knew everything about him long before JFK was shot.

    • @davidarbuckle7236
      @davidarbuckle7236 Рік тому

      @@tpryce6243 THe information that the FBI and Dallas Police wanted to be released was hand fed to the Press, and they bought it all without doing any investigative reporting. They even "Knew" It was 3 shots even when there was no such consensus.

  • @jamess9384
    @jamess9384 3 роки тому +197

    The look on his face after the reporter said "you've been charged with murdering the President" reminds me of the look of someone who just got thrown under the bus.
    There are just too many inconsistencies and coincidences in Oswalds adult life for me to believe there was no connection between him and the CIA and FBI.

    • @rstefanie2622
      @rstefanie2622 3 роки тому +4

      :43 Jack Ruby!

    • @gfexc
      @gfexc 3 роки тому +1

      The same look Ted Bundy had when they asked him if he killed any women

    • @williambrown171
      @williambrown171 3 роки тому +1

      @@gfexc I’ve heard they were victims of the same program//MK/ULTRA

    • @stevemacbr
      @stevemacbr 3 роки тому +6

      As Oswald said - " I'm a PATSY "
      - 3 shots rang out.
      - 1st & 2nd were standard 6.5mm rounds
      - 3rd shot was a 6mm DUMB-DUMB round - shot from the rear at close range & at a lower & left-diagonsl trajectory to JFK than the 6th floor elevation. SPECIAL AGENT - HICKEY, was in the follow car, and is photographed with an AR-15 rifle in his hand in the rear of the car.
      - You can't have 2-different types of round in the same clip,... both were fired from two different rifles.
      - THE CIA / FBI AGENTS ( SECRET SERVICE DETAIL) IN THE FOLLOW CAR WERE ALL CULPABLE.
      .... see video of book - FATAL ERROR
      Note: If Oswald was at the 6th-floor window 'shooting',... HE would have seen the FATAL SHOT taken by HICKEY, and would have said so, to get himself off the hook.
      - It is my opinion that Oswald was working as normal,... his rifle had been taken (by agents) & placed there on the day.
      - An agency controlled 'marksman' was to provide the x2 distraction shots, and in the planned chaos - HINKEY pulled up the AR-15 and shot JFK.
      .

    • @TheJpep2424
      @TheJpep2424 2 роки тому +3

      @@gfexc except Bundy was guilty

  • @orangedac
    @orangedac 11 років тому +133

    5:05 He's saying they're putting me in a police line-up with a tee-shirt and a bruised eye, its obvious I'm gonna be picked out.

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому

      well stop killing cops.

    • @Paul-km8ko
      @Paul-km8ko 2 роки тому +3

      @@leemoore9933 that was oswald's double that shot tippet - simple logic

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому +3

      @@Paul-km8ko Thats perfect logic, what a sane way to look at it. May I suggest breaking the meds in half.

    • @Paul-km8ko
      @Paul-km8ko 2 роки тому

      @@leemoore9933 You can't deny there was an oswald double. plenty of gov't documents to that affect. You don't find it strange that oswald was placed in different locations at the same time? They even managed to arrest oswald two separate times at the movie theater - imagine that. The first time they bought him out the front door and into a police cruiser, then moments later they arrested him a second time, bringing him out the back door and into a police cruiser according to multiple eye witnesses - oswald was like a magician, popping up all over the place

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому +1

      @@Paul-km8ko I don't read a lot of these bizarre stories of these grand conspiracy's their just to over the top like some james bond movie, it's just insanity IMO to buy into this crapola. Mental hospitals or some anyway have access to the internet in their library's I think that's where some of this comes from. Best to you, I won't respond to anything else in regards to this post.

  • @Stratboy999
    @Stratboy999 14 років тому +125

    What is particularly shocking is that the media had such access to a man who had not even been charged at that point. Oswald is being held up as the scapegoat in the most crass and obvious way and the NOPD are complicit or at the very least negligent in not safeguarding him against the eventual public execution carried out by Ruby.

    • @tg8078
      @tg8078 3 роки тому +14

      It was Dallas PD

    • @jamesbaka1206
      @jamesbaka1206 2 роки тому +4

      The only reason I’m led to believe Oswald actually did it is because he had one phone call and he tried to call a man named John D Hurt. John Hurt was in intelligence for the Army in WW2. Victor Marchetti who was in the CIA as an executive assistant to the deputy director said he knew exactly what Oswald was doing. He said that when an intelligence operative is in trouble he will call a third party number who will then alert the operatives handler that he is in danger rather than calling the handler directly. John D Hurt was the third party who would alert Oswald’s handler. Marchetti had seen it many times. I think from that it’s pretty clear that Oswald was intelligence and was on a mission to assasinate the president. Imo it was because of Kennedys opposition to the “secret society” as Kennedy put it. He had already named them in a speech in 1961 and was about to expose them and they needed to shut him up. A bullet in the brain will do the trick. Just like they did Epstein.

    • @daviddowns7552
      @daviddowns7552 2 роки тому

      he was claimed guilty before a trial that would never happen. jack ruby was a jerk taking things in his own hands. or as they claim. i dont trust or belive the government no further than i can throw the trash.

    • @daviddowns7552
      @daviddowns7552 2 роки тому +1

      whats nopd??

    • @joebeamish
      @joebeamish Рік тому

      @@jamesbaka1206 Yes, it’s clear that Oswald was an asset of the intelligence community. It is NOT clear that he shot Tippit or JFK. He was somehow involved. But all the evidence indicates that a number of other teams did the killing.

  • @nadiajamesroper4947
    @nadiajamesroper4947 2 роки тому +176

    Absolutely shocking how governments are allowed to get away with these things

    • @Joe.8671
      @Joe.8671 2 роки тому

      That's because they serve Satan

    • @Brianfightingmad
      @Brianfightingmad 2 роки тому +9

      Get away with what?

    • @robfrancis8690
      @robfrancis8690 2 роки тому +10

      @@Brianfightingmad Get away with, bad acting performances by a group of clown circus performers.

    • @bryanbaxter3558
      @bryanbaxter3558 2 роки тому +3

      You mean the Mafia hit? Didn't have anything to do with government

    • @mariahyohannes
      @mariahyohannes 2 роки тому +7

      @@bryanbaxter3558 Stop lying to yourself

  • @LoneStarLawman
    @LoneStarLawman 3 роки тому +53

    In 1963, as you can see, the security at Dallas PD HQ, was nonexistent, with reporters and tv crews jammed in the hallways. That has changed of course, as today, a reporter would not be allowed anywhere near Oswald. Miranda rights, also was not law until 1966.

    • @LoneStarLawman
      @LoneStarLawman 2 роки тому +8

      Your correct Drew. SCOTUS, in the Miranda, and Escobedo rulings basically stated, that once a lawyer is requested, all questions must cease and a lawyer must be acquired. Apparently, that was not common practice, until those rulings.

    • @Brianfightingmad
      @Brianfightingmad 2 роки тому +4

      @@LoneStarLawman Miranda wasn't ruled on yet.

    • @audreywilborn2018
      @audreywilborn2018 2 роки тому +4

      Oswald was only 24 years old but looked 40 .

    • @cristianm7097
      @cristianm7097 2 роки тому +15

      @@audreywilborn2018 People in the 1940s - 1960s matured already as teenagers. Times were rough, unlike the pampered snowflakes of the 2020s.

    • @jackpalance9509
      @jackpalance9509 Рік тому

      @@audreywilborn2018 Good observation. The question is why? Stress will age a person...I believe that in his young life he was a Federal Agent...Many questions. Here is what is known. Lee Oswald was never afforded a trial of his peers. There were many who had an axe to grind and much to gain with JFK out of the picture. In my view, the case is still open and the verdict unknown as to to innocence/guilt of Lee Harvey Oswald.

  • @Danny-Craig
    @Danny-Craig 2 роки тому +54

    "You have been charged" the look on Oswalds face tells me everything, a innocent man who has lost all hope.

    • @jamesanthony5681
      @jamesanthony5681 2 роки тому +4

      Interesting. Maybe we should decide guilt and innocence in our courtrooms based on the look on defendants' faces.

    • @Danny-Craig
      @Danny-Craig 2 роки тому +4

      @@jamesanthony5681 youve missed the point of my reply entirely...

    • @jamesanthony5681
      @jamesanthony5681 2 роки тому +2

      @@Danny-Craig 'A '[sic] innocent man' is what you wrote.

    • @Danny-Craig
      @Danny-Craig 2 роки тому +6

      @@jamesanthony5681 I see its guilty until proven innocent my apologies.

    • @jamesanthony5681
      @jamesanthony5681 2 роки тому +3

      @@Danny-Craig You said that, bud. Apparently, you're the one that can look into peoples' faces - at least in Oswald's case - to divine 'lost hope'.

  • @geoffm9944
    @geoffm9944 3 роки тому +23

    Frankly, it was ludicrous to have swarms of newspaper journalists and TV broadcast units filling the corridors of police HQ. It was like a media circus! The Texas police by allowing this ‘invasion’ were swamped and so any proper interrogation was impossible.

  • @slixlixx
    @slixlixx 8 років тому +61

    "...we gotta indoctrinate this guy..." What???

    • @jenniferkirsch2478
      @jenniferkirsch2478 5 років тому +10

      I said the same SHIIIIIIIIIT!!!!! UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!

    • @jneta9712
      @jneta9712 5 років тому +1

      I heard that too

    • @kernhuerta9225
      @kernhuerta9225 5 років тому +6

      I heard that as well wtf. We need to overthrow the government. It's been taken by satanic forces

    • @mavjimbo
      @mavjimbo 7 місяців тому +2

      I know, WTF that even mean ????

    • @ted.angell7609
      @ted.angell7609 Місяць тому

      Yeah, what was that about?

  • @RobertBrown-yd4sy
    @RobertBrown-yd4sy 3 роки тому +16

    0:43 Jack Ruby standing in the hallway on the day of the arrest 11-22-1963

  • @CapteinRiggs
    @CapteinRiggs Рік тому +27

    Why do I every now and then jump back into this rabbit hole, like I'm going to solve the case or something lol..

  • @SciFiArtman
    @SciFiArtman 8 років тому +45

    Thank you for posting this compilation video! Such a fascinating case! So many good points to support and/or question each theory! So many strange events involved in the many aspects of people, places, timings, and artifacts! Like a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. Whether Oswald was a patsy, or not - he was certainly the perfect person to be such!

    • @Steaks652
      @Steaks652 8 днів тому

      He was the greatest actor of all time for someone who had just committed the murder of the president of the United States.

  • @seguino
    @seguino 11 років тому +26

    If Oswald did it, he would have admitted it and grinned a creepy grin.Hes the same man that was unapologetic about handing out FPFC info and was proud about his Russian history. Wake up people, he was the biggest Patsy of all time. Quite sad actually

    • @PatrickMcCarthy-m1k
      @PatrickMcCarthy-m1k 29 днів тому

      Oswald shot officer Tippet at 10th Street and Patton in front of witnesses, he's guilty.

    • @PaulHenreid
      @PaulHenreid 27 днів тому

      @@PatrickMcCarthy-m1k Oswald was at the theatre at 1:04. Tippet was shot 1:08. Over half of the witnesses testified it was not Oswald. Some witnesses saw two shooters of Tippit and the shell casings were different and neither matched the non-working gun Oswald had at the theatre. One of witnesses Reynolds, was shot in the head because he would not change his testimony. It was only after being shot in the head and surviving the witness changed his testimony and identified Oswald as the shooter. I can't wait until Trump's new administration and attorney general bring out the gimp and prosecute the Deep State pieces of garbage responsible for sending schmucks like you and robots out to disseminate lies and false information whilst censoring the truth. You cowardly traitors have it coming.

    • @Jcoppertone
      @Jcoppertone 23 дні тому

      @@PatrickMcCarthy-m1klol you sure about that ?

  • @ContikiCuddler
    @ContikiCuddler 3 роки тому +63

    How did the press get so much info on Lee so quickly? It came from Hoover. Before the police even knew Lee's name Hoover had contacted the Dallas police. He told them they had Lee Harvey Oswald and to call off the search for any other suspects. Oswald was their man. How did Hoover have all that info and was able to contact the police so quickly after the shooting of JFK? Lee was right he was a patsy. He had been set up to take the fall for something he didn't do. He knew too much. On the day he died he was made to put on the dark sweater he was wearing in the basement.They knew Lee was going to be shot and it would be live on tv. They didn't want people to see all the blood which would have been the case in his white t-shirt. Chest compressions were done on him in the ambulance. That's a death sentence for someone with such a severe injury. At the hospital Dr. I believe it was Crenshaw was called out of the trauma room to take a phone call. It was from LBJ who the dr said gave him a message that was more like order to get a death bed confession. Those people were evil SOBs that should have been drawn and quartered. R.I.P Lee.

    • @winggullseagull1230
      @winggullseagull1230 3 роки тому +6

      Oswald was shot with a blank by an FBI man posing as Jack Ruby. That's why there was no blood on the floor or any blood splatter.The basement was pure theater to prevent a trial. The doctor & autopsy report said a bullet struck Lee tearing thru all his major organs & blood vessels bleeding to death into cardiac arrest losing lots of blood......& yet no blood on the floor.
      That's why LHO was wearing a dark sweater so blood wouldn't be seen.

    • @TheJpep2424
      @TheJpep2424 2 роки тому +6

      @@winggullseagull1230 delusional. He was shot and killed by Ruby.

    • @judythbaker4344
      @judythbaker4344 2 роки тому +2

      @@winggullseagull1230 NO, SIR. You have been deliberately misinformed. And that indeed was Jack Ruby. Do you think that gangster would have let himself get railroaded and take the blame? He tried to plead crazy at first.

    • @winggullseagull1230
      @winggullseagull1230 2 роки тому +4

      @@judythbaker4344 The garage shooter is not Jack Ruby it's so obvious even from behind. Sorry but Ralph Cinque is right. You & everyone else believe it's Ruby because that's what you were told.
      Except for the observant few that knows it's NOT Ruby.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +1

      All false rubbish.

  • @heartgold8570
    @heartgold8570 9 років тому +57

    JACK RUBY IS VISIBLE AT 43 SECS. WAS HE HOPING TO KILL OSWALD SOONER

    • @darren.plateroti
      @darren.plateroti 4 роки тому +13

      Indeed, Ruby admitted to that one month after the fact. His loaded revolver sat in his right pocket during his appearance here as a “reporter”.

    • @johnreavey504
      @johnreavey504 4 роки тому +8

      If you read Ruby's trial transcripts there are two witnesses for the state that said they overheard Ruby talking to someone on the phone about being there when they transferred LHO. Ruby was stalking LHO and it was not a spur of the moment thing to shoot him like we have been told! Ruby was sent by the mob. Dorothy Kilgallen said she had the scoop of the century after attending the Ruby trial and interviewing him twice. I'm guessing she found out that Ruby had connections to Carlos Marcello and that LHO knew him from New Orleans. She died under shady circumstances and her notes were missing. LHO just didn't shoot the president without an exit plan. I think someone failed to pick him up and he panicked. I think if they would have picked him up he would have ended up like Jimmy Hoffa. It would have been a mystery. But LHO got caught and Ruby was sent to shut him up.

    • @Roseredeemed
      @Roseredeemed 3 роки тому +2

      No he was part of the group from the beginning the “jack ruby” character was for the FF murder. To make sure what they did stayed covered up a show for the emotional manipulation of society to brainwash US citizens to get behind their war agenda just like other times 9/11 or just recently on Jan 6th in DC!!

    • @tblack4428
      @tblack4428 3 роки тому +4

      Jack Ruby (Rubenstein) knew and had connections with Lee Oswald prior to the JFK Assassination. Lee Oswald had many connections and served groups within the U.S. Government's Intellegence Community. Jack Ruby was there to tie up the loose ends (assassinate Oswald) so there would be no one to expose the real killers and men in the know.
      Ask yourself WHO gained the most from JFK's assassination ... one answer, one man ... LBJ !

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому +2

      @@tblack4428 Did you know Rudy called one of the caps to warn him about Oswald getting shot? Ruby didn't want to kill Oswald, he was forced to.

  • @bigup13
    @bigup13 10 років тому +179

    Lee Harvey Oswald was the ultimate patsy.

    • @yamatotakeru9078
      @yamatotakeru9078 3 роки тому +3

      TRUE

    • @mrsinister8943
      @mrsinister8943 3 роки тому +5

      Sirhan Sirhan was the ultimate patsy. LHO knew some shit and wasn't innocent but probably had help

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому +8

      guilty as hell.

    • @worldtourmaster
      @worldtourmaster 2 роки тому

      Why would you parade a person out in public with no security that was accused of killing the president? Complete set up to frame and kill someone for the crime, and sweep it under the rug.

    • @jackmayoff5797
      @jackmayoff5797 2 роки тому +6

      Ultimate fall guy lol

  • @Clovistoolsdotcom
    @Clovistoolsdotcom 11 років тому +50

    He did not do it like they want you to believe,Oswald was seen by 2 people on the second floor eating lunch between 12:15 and 12:20, the president was shot around 12:30,so if you are going to kill the president why would you stop eat lunch 10 mins before you shoot and the limo was 5 mins late on top of that and he had no idea they would not be on time going threw the plaza.He ran up to the 6th floor without anyone seeing him go up and shoot the president and come back down to 2nd floor drinking a coke and police said he was not out of breath.The checked the rifle for finger prints and had none of his prints on it just his palm print only,how can you shoot an older rifle bolt action 3 times in 6 seconds without leaving any prints. Run down wiping all prints and not be out of breath. They found chicken upstairs so whoever shot him from this location stayed the nite so he would not be detected the next day and probably stayed there while Oswald was being arrested and casually walked out in a uniform and never be seen.Why would any person kill Oswald for killing the president unless he was a family member or very close friend to take that risk in broad daylite over the death of any president, they knew if Oswald went to court he would be found not guilty so within 48 hours they had him killed.But the weird part of all of this is during his 12 hour interview at the police station there is no transcripts of anything that was said or on any recording device and when asked why they said the room was too smal for a stenogragher

    • @surrealist2k
      @surrealist2k 11 років тому +8

      Its the other way around the Conspiracy theorists have you decieved. None of their claims are based on any concrete evidence. Any criminal lawyer will tell you that in any case if the individual is convicted of just three convictions it makes them guilty. Just THREE. Oswald was convicted of 53. None of the conspiracy theories has any basis in truth.

    • @Flusherized1989
      @Flusherized1989 11 років тому +8

      Steven Tyler Ok why is it you cant get Oswald's Tax return? Explain Howard Hunt's deathbed confession? And LBJ's mistress has even said the night before the President was murdered LBJ swore to her that it would be the last time the President laughed at him.... explain that?

    • @MrsTonyDinozzio
      @MrsTonyDinozzio 11 років тому +3

      Actually, from what I have read, it was ten minutes late.

    • @BullToTheShit
      @BullToTheShit 11 років тому +6

      300tank wrote: "Oswald was seen by 2 people on the second floor eating lunch between 12:15 and 12:20"
      What are the names of these "Alleged" co-workers who said they say Oswald at that time? Should be easy enough to provide at least ONE of the two names.

    • @ARTZY64
      @ARTZY64 10 років тому +6

      A problem with conspiracy-mongers is that they think they are immune to scientific explanations because, after all, anyone who disagrees with them must be a government shill.
      Here's some science re fingerprints.
      The term "no prints" does not mean that there were no marks or smears - it means that if any markings were present, they lacked sufficient detail to be of evidentiary value. As there are limits to the collection of prints at all scenes, an evaluation of what should be preserved as evidence is a necessity. Technicians cannot develop, preserve, document, and collect all fragmentary portions of ridge detail at crime scenes. Realistic expectations and a point of diminishing return are factors with which to reckon. ("Fingerprints: What They Can & Cannot Do!," The Print, Volume 10, number 7, June 1994, pp. 1-3.)
      Even when the fingerprints are found on firearms, they are almost always too smudged to be useful. One reason is that these weapons are likely to be slightly oily, especially if well kept. Another is that the person using the weapon holds it so tightly that the prints are smeared. And if the weapon is fired, the jolt smears any prints that might otherwise have been useful.
      Thus, while the presence of fingerprints on a weapon clearly inculpates a suspect, the lack of such prints doesn't let him off the hook. It's entirely normal and routine for guilty suspects not to have left usable prints on a weapon.

  • @N0TYourAverageJoe
    @N0TYourAverageJoe 11 років тому +21

    Lots of good footage here, thanks!

  • @hermanthepoolshooter7115
    @hermanthepoolshooter7115 7 років тому +41

    As you look real carefully at Oswald , noticed how he recognize jack ruby as he look upward as he was moved to interrogation . Why was he denied legal representation . This is a conspiracy . The warren report is a sack of lies.💩💩💩💩

    • @BoneCK15
      @BoneCK15 6 років тому +8

      They didn't give him a lawyer and as far as we know there are no notes or recordings of his multiple interrogations. It leads me to believe that the DA knew that it would never go to trial.

    • @charlesrobbins2208
      @charlesrobbins2208 5 років тому +7

      @@BoneCK15 more likely they did not want what he said to be made available to the public.

    • @dallasbrubaker6054
      @dallasbrubaker6054 5 років тому +2

      @@charlesrobbins2208 yep and for the same reason

    • @mikerotonda6264
      @mikerotonda6264 4 роки тому +1

      When herman?? What is the time when Oswald sees ruby???I saw ruby alone at 43 seconds...

    • @joshboncoeur6985
      @joshboncoeur6985 9 місяців тому

      Get lucid...

  • @brad9382
    @brad9382 6 років тому +22

    Can't believe how they kept parading him out in front of the press like that. Especially such a high profile suspect.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому +1

      and it says it all he doesn't take any opportunity to blow any plot, or say what he knows, or beg protection for his family....

    • @Ur2ez4me81
      @Ur2ez4me81 2 роки тому

      You have to remember the assassinations of presidents don’t happen every day

    • @anonymousapocalypse247
      @anonymousapocalypse247 Рік тому +4

      That lines up with theory Jack Ruby was there twice in this video at the police station but couldn't get close enough. I think they kept parading hom for Ruby to take his shot and end the need for trial and continue the narrative

    • @jamesbaka1206
      @jamesbaka1206 9 місяців тому

      @@aaronz7056he was intelligence and tried to call his CIA handler while in jail to try to get him out of the mess. He still had faith that the CIA would bail him out of the situation. He did however get frustrated at the situation and reveal that he was indeed a “patsy”. He really didn’t have much time to strategize because he was killed immediately. I’d be willing to bet he figured his CIA handlers would get him out of the mess and fix the situation but the reality was, his handlers had set him up to take the fall in the first place. Explaining why he was murdered and snuffed out so quick so that he would stop talking.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 9 місяців тому

      @@jamesbaka1206 Crackpot B.S. "I'd be willing to bet..." LOL
      He never STARTED talking, blanket denying everything, claiming he "had no idea what this was about" AFTER being caught red-handed trying to murder a police officer (how in the hell was "the CIA" going to "bail him out" of THAT???), and I repeat, he made no attempt to blow any conspiracy to any cop, any member of his family, to the President of the Dallas Bar Association, or to a live TV audience of millions.
      One drunken ex-agent tried to make a crank call TO the police station, this leading to a garbled and hilariously implausible story Oswald was trying to call "the CIA." This was debunked years ago, and by a couple of conspiracy authors, no less.

  • @TELEVISIONARCHIVES
    @TELEVISIONARCHIVES 9 років тому +9

    Oswald was a liar. On November 23, Oswald was visited by the president of the Dallas Bar Association, H. Louis Nichols, who offered him help in getting a lawyer; Oswald refused the offer. Oswald was told by the police that he could use the telephone when he wished, and he did make telephone calls. He attempted to call attorney John Abt in New York but was unsuccessful in reaching him. Mrs. Paine testified that at Oswald's request she tried without success to reach Abt. Oswald was also visited by his wife, mother, and brother, to any of whom he could have turned for help in getting counsel

  • @rogerevans9666
    @rogerevans9666 Рік тому +11

    Jack Ruby briefly appears in the middle of the picture @0:43--white guy, bald on top, dark suit. Before Ruby shot Oswald, J. Edgar Hoover called the Dallas PD and said that they were "showing Oswald off too much". If the armored car on the street that was supposed to take Oswald to the county jail had fit into that underground parking garage, it could have backed inches from the door from where the police were leading Oswald out, and perhaps that would have saved Oswald's life. Officer Leavelle, the guy with the cowboy hat, appears on the right @5:49.

    • @scod9746
      @scod9746 Рік тому

      I think part of the press conference was cut out when Ruby corrected the name of 'Fair Play for Cuba'

  • @globalspiritualrevolutionmedia

    Everyone Notice Jack Ruby at The -0:43 mark of the video! Interesting🤔

    • @stevewiley8409
      @stevewiley8409 Місяць тому

      interesting.. but he wasn't wearing his hat !

  • @TheAutisticCat
    @TheAutisticCat 11 років тому +36

    can't the Dallas police control access to their offices?

    • @johanconradie2120
      @johanconradie2120 3 роки тому +3

      exactly!!!

    • @ML-ul2zq
      @ML-ul2zq 3 роки тому +1

      @@lancejohnson127 Ruby was there in the station twice.

    • @hellospam879879
      @hellospam879879 3 роки тому

      Ridiculous

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому +1

      @@ML-ul2zq ruby was there all the time he liked cops and was nosey. he was a pain in the butt.

    • @rc59191
      @rc59191 2 роки тому +1

      Jack Ruby was let in by a Dallas PD officer this whole thing stinks.

  • @JFK-ir7yz
    @JFK-ir7yz 3 роки тому +54

    Every officer is so close to him at all times that the press can hardly ask a question yet....Ruby was able to walk up and “shoot” him. People will believe anything they are told to believe.

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому

      a so minded person could have shot him there too.

    • @h.r.puffnstuff8705
      @h.r.puffnstuff8705 2 роки тому +1

      Jack Ruby makes two appearances in this video. -6:18 there he is in middle of the screen.
      -4:05 Ruby can be heard angrily asking Oswald, “nobody asked what”?! X2

    • @tedpeterson1156
      @tedpeterson1156 2 роки тому +4

      @@h.r.puffnstuff8705 at 43 seconds? That's him isn't it?

    • @h.r.puffnstuff8705
      @h.r.puffnstuff8705 2 роки тому

      @@tedpeterson1156 yes. Note no hat or glasses. Other times u see him mix with the press he’s wearing very thick frame glasses.

    • @MM-ig1iv
      @MM-ig1iv Рік тому +4

      The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it. A lot of dumb naive people out there..

  • @redbeard8834
    @redbeard8834 Рік тому +52

    He truly was a patsy poor guy

    • @Milky1348
      @Milky1348 10 місяців тому +1

      Can u prove that

    • @xxitactical_8723
      @xxitactical_8723 10 місяців тому

      He undoubtedly shot a police man after this so not really

    • @abiythelegend9532
      @abiythelegend9532 7 місяців тому +3

      @@Milky1348 can you prove not

    • @Milky1348
      @Milky1348 7 місяців тому +1

      @@abiythelegend9532 More evidence that he worked alone than with other people.

    • @sdhscrosscountry
      @sdhscrosscountry 4 місяці тому

      Exactly.
      He was part of the Civil Air Patrol , there's a photo of him with David Ferrie when he was 15 yrs old.
      School Book Depostery building was own by the man that started the Civil Air Patrol Admiral Byrd. David Ferrie and Jack Ruby worked with the mob . involved with wanting Castro out of Cuba.

  • @edbtzkhud
    @edbtzkhud Рік тому +8

    At 5:09 he’s explaining to the press how he’s being taken to a line up being the only one dressed as he is and everyone else in proper attire just so he can be singled out and picked out.

    • @owenkamp2001
      @owenkamp2001 2 місяці тому

      Ikr like that doesn’t seem fair

  • @jdig1984
    @jdig1984 3 роки тому +22

    It's funny how the press knew his whole backstory

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому

      Yeah, I guess they are psychic...

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +2

      By that evening there had been plenty of time for police to look up records on this ex-defector.

    • @meathdetal
      @meathdetal Рік тому +2

      CIA/FBI delivered their lines to them wrapped in a bow

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 9 місяців тому

      @@meathdetal And CT authors delivered yours, right?

    • @SAM57119
      @SAM57119 Місяць тому

      ​@@aaronz7056 They were fast researchers without the internet.

  • @matvelous
    @matvelous 12 років тому +24

    I believe you were innocent Lee. Always will.

    • @ksenobite
      @ksenobite Рік тому

      Every 2 million inmates in US prisons are innocent, they are framed by government of lizards. The secret message is hidden in Joe Rogan podcasts, if you listen to it in reverse you will hear lizards talking

    • @Goofyahhboy4677
      @Goofyahhboy4677 Рік тому

      Prove it

  • @closeoutsaleusa5322
    @closeoutsaleusa5322 Рік тому +30

    At :43 in the video... there's JACK RUBY. Jack Ruby was also seen at the hospital shortly after Kennedy arrived. There is also a photo of Ruby standing outside of the Texas Book Depository shortly after the assassination. I think Ruby and Oswald knew each other. And Ruby knew that Oswald was the "patsy".. or "fall guy" and his job was to take Oswald out.

    • @swagymicswagger
      @swagymicswagger Рік тому +1

      Holy shit

    • @meathdetal
      @meathdetal Рік тому +2

      Ruby knew who oswald was and what he had to do. All part of the plan.

    • @daviddowns7552
      @daviddowns7552 2 місяці тому

      Ruby was mafia associate.

    • @panamablack9671
      @panamablack9671 Місяць тому +1

      Exactly

    • @PaulHenreid
      @PaulHenreid 27 днів тому +1

      duh - Ruby being at the police station that morning was no coincidence. He had been hanging around waiting for the opportunity. Ruby was paid $50k and was assured he would be free. In fact, Ruby died after being convicted a trial but was granted a new trial when he died of cancer injected by the MK Ultra doctor while Ruby was in jail.

  • @mrb6553
    @mrb6553 2 роки тому +51

    The LOOK on his face and reaction when he was told he'd been charged with killing JFK is everything. That is a genuine human reaction. That is complete shock/disbelief. He clearly knew he was being railroaded.

    • @stevebbq7913
      @stevebbq7913 Рік тому

      @Gannon witnesses SAW him shoot tippet, dummy.

    • @stevebbq7913
      @stevebbq7913 Рік тому

      @Gannon you were there?
      So you're telling me YOUR theory is fact and several eye witnesses are mistaken?
      If Oswald is a patsy, why was he not at work; but at the texas theater?
      Did Tippett shoot himself, then, clown?
      I'll bet you think the earth is flat, you aluminum hat wearing nut job?

    • @stevebbq7913
      @stevebbq7913 Рік тому

      @Gannon I've been researching the assassination since I was a teen.
      I'm not saying the Warren commission got it 100% right, but all these bs conspiracies are ridiculous. Soooo many people would've had to keep quiet. Oliver stones movie was not "fact"....
      Do you believe everything you read on the interweb?
      Dip shit....

    • @pmccoy8924
      @pmccoy8924 Рік тому

      @Gannon He was known by CIA as he had done intelligence work for them in the summer of 63'. He was also a Marine so they knew him well. Dabbled in communist ideology, spending time in Russia. Perfect scapegoat that American's ate up for 50 years.

    • @hlinville6034
      @hlinville6034 Рік тому

      Says there is six replies to this comment. I see one.

  • @hermanthepoolshooter7115
    @hermanthepoolshooter7115 7 років тому +51

    Oswald was a patsy. He did not kill the president or officer Tippet

    • @ajay999999
      @ajay999999 5 років тому +8

      Yeah eye witnesses saw him shoot tippet. It was amazing how his rifle just happened to be in the book depository.

    • @tito9694
      @tito9694 5 років тому

      Shut up

    • @ajay999999
      @ajay999999 5 років тому +1

      @@tito9694 JR? Are u Jack Ruby?

    • @tito9694
      @tito9694 5 років тому +8

      @@ajay999999 dude look into it. Eveything points to Oswald. His gun shipped to his address under an assumed name, his letter he left that day to marina and the other letter for the assasination attempt he tried in april of the same year of general walker i believe is his name. His movements after the shooting was that of a chicken with his head cut off. He was in total panic and dipped into a shoe store after he shot Tippet and watch the police go by. Then a worker saw oswald leave when police passed by and saw him go into texas theatre and the guy told authorities. Also they saw him go in without paying the person working at the theatre. Im in Dallas im obssesed with this event

    • @tito9694
      @tito9694 5 років тому +1

      @@ajay999999 ajay999999 dude im in agreement with u

  • @TudorOwen50s
    @TudorOwen50s 3 роки тому +20

    Good thing I have a few days off. I've been binge watching these vintage clips all day. Is this what the rabbit hole of assassination conspiracy feels like? :-)

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому +1

      I guess you believe in some conspiracy? Try focusing on the facts their pretty solid.

    • @judythbaker4344
      @judythbaker4344 2 роки тому +1

      yes... but the truth is coming out.

    • @easternyellowjacket276
      @easternyellowjacket276 Рік тому +2

      LOL! The same thing happened to me. Never got into the whole thing until I had a few days off and fell into this rabbit hole.

    • @anonymousapocalypse247
      @anonymousapocalypse247 Рік тому

      That has become my past 3 days as well lol
      No lone nut!

  • @CrashingCrockery
    @CrashingCrockery 16 років тому +36

    This is fascinating. Theories aside, one rarely ever hears the preamble and ambient noise prior to and after he is walked through. Squeaky doors, mumbling, and the occasional objective comment from an unseen commentator or spectator. I like this rare and unusual compilation very much, and thanks for posting it.

    • @yourmovebro8650
      @yourmovebro8650 Рік тому +5

      Yeah. Also when he is talking …it sounds like they are trying to drown out his words with chairs sliding etc

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому

      @@yourmovebro8650 Really?

  • @SanaZub
    @SanaZub 11 років тому +86

    This is such a confusing case but its sooo interesting...

    • @ignorecorporatenews
      @ignorecorporatenews 5 років тому +5

      read book Me and Lee by Judyth Baker, and you will not be confused at all anymore. and her 4 subsequent books are all as good / excellent also

    • @BullToTheShit
      @BullToTheShit 5 років тому +2

      @@ignorecorporatenews Read _Case Closed_ by Gerald Posner.

    • @crispinfrancis1
      @crispinfrancis1 5 років тому +20

      @@BullToTheShit That book is bullshit. Sick of people citing it as evidence, it's one sided biased bullshit.

    • @marksesl
      @marksesl 4 роки тому

      @@crispinfrancis1 And, what makes you think the conspiracy books aren't one-sided bullshit? I've always been open minded, but allegations to show conspiracy always get disproven. Allegations that support the official version always get confirmed.

    • @win1atime
      @win1atime 3 роки тому +1

      @@marksesl "always"?

  • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
    @TheCShowHostedbyChris 9 років тому +109

    This guy was so innocent. It's a shame.

    • @Mina-te5qi
      @Mina-te5qi 9 років тому +11

      +Chris Peeks I honestly don't think he killed JFK. I think whoever did it got off scott- free. And that pisses me off.

    • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
      @TheCShowHostedbyChris 9 років тому +6

      Mina 12 well ce399 was a plant that's obvious check out a guy named Harry weatherford he was a Dallas cop shooting from the daltex building, jack Lawrence an ex air forced commando that was firing from the underpass. His car dealership provided cars to the motorcade but the day jfk was shot he was 6 hours late to work his trousers were muddy and he went straight to the bathroom and threw up also one of the delears demos were found at the grassy knoll a few days later. That's just a few there were 6 spotters and six locations in all. Some of the shoots got the call to abort because no one else was supposed to be hit but jfk. White washed.

    • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
      @TheCShowHostedbyChris 9 років тому +5

      Mina 12 Mina read the book rush to judgement by mark lane. It will give a start at realizing how fake the Warren commission was.

    • @ama79adr
      @ama79adr 9 років тому +1

      +Chris Peeks it would of went to trial and he would of beat it...funny how when oswald gets shot wheres the blood...all staged...

    • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
      @TheCShowHostedbyChris 9 років тому +8

      ama79adr there was no way they were going to let him go to trial. I mean they transfer him during the middle of the day and he was shot while In front of 85 Dallas police officers. If you ever watch it in slow motion oswald makes eye contact with ruby before he lunges at him.

  • @Coowallsky
    @Coowallsky 10 років тому +17

    It would take more than two hands to count the number of 'shady' people in that video.

    • @KMcNally117
      @KMcNally117 3 роки тому +1

      Name 10 to start.

    • @luispiros
      @luispiros Рік тому

      The only shady person in this video is Lee Harvey, he’s lying to your face and you accept it or say “maybe” in your head.

  • @tomtransport
    @tomtransport 2 роки тому +6

    At 0:42 to 0:45 Jack Ruby can be seen looking down the hall away from the camera then to his left where we see his profile. A reporter or someone with a still camera can be seen looking at Ruby and smiling at him.

    • @graemeosborne584
      @graemeosborne584 Рік тому +1

      At .24 you can also see back of rubys head.... so many officers around oswald mean he got pushed away to where he was at .42

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому

      So? Ruby was known to hang around the station and was friendly with many in the Dallas PD.

    • @tomtransport
      @tomtransport Рік тому

      @@jetcat132 I was merely pointing out where and when I saw Ruby so others can see him too. I did not infer in my text what it meant. I have my theory and others can have theirs or think nothing of it like you. Someone else here pointed out that the Dallas Police let anybody and their grandmother walk in and out of the police station. Why not tell them you saw no grandmothers and cover all your bases?🤣🤣

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому +1

      @@tomtransport Haha you’re right!

  • @wolfman-nz6or
    @wolfman-nz6or 6 років тому +39

    how could he be charged when they havent looked at one shred of evidence yet wow thats amazing.

    • @guddergo7116
      @guddergo7116 4 роки тому +9

      Govt wanted to wrap things up quick.

    • @tylsimys67
      @tylsimys67 4 роки тому +4

      He was charged of murdering constable Tippit - Oswald had the gun linking him to that murder.

    • @drby0788
      @drby0788 4 роки тому +7

      @@tylsimys67 except the shells found at the scene were .38 autos, not .38 special ammo. Oswals had a revolver, not a semi auto pistol

    • @doravernon1511
      @doravernon1511 3 роки тому +3

      @@drby0788 the Patsy's gun had a faulty firing pin.

    • @AuschwitzMyPants
      @AuschwitzMyPants 3 роки тому +2

      @@drby0788 Eyewitnesses to the Tippet shooting said they saw a man fleeing and emptying his REVOLVER.

  • @pajasa62
    @pajasa62 9 років тому +49

    They have all these clips, but they leave out probably the best one from Nov. 23 early evening when Oswald said he was "being denied his basic hygienic rights, like a shower".

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому +3

      ua-cam.com/video/VcGk6NWZzb0/v-deo.html

    • @pajasa62
      @pajasa62 3 роки тому +4

      @@swankybutters8371
      Thanks for that! I hadn't seen that in a long time.

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому +3

      just typical im the victim attitude.

    • @mariahyohannes
      @mariahyohannes 2 роки тому +14

      @@leemoore9933 Doesn't the American constitution state: INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY IN A COURT OF LAW? Oswald was not convicted of any killing. It was illegal for them to deny him legal representation and it was illegal for them to deny him a shower. They also blocked the one phone call he was allowed to make.

    • @shanet5604
      @shanet5604 Рік тому

      @@mariahyohannesHe refused lawyers,he phoned John Abt whom he wanted but Abt was away ! Just do some basic research instead of believing every CT comment…

  • @Blade5276
    @Blade5276 16 років тому +19

    Has anyone ever wondered how they found him. Oswald was seen entering a movie theater with out paying for a ticket, the manager called the police. Why wasnt the manager told they had a far bigger criminal to hunt down? Yet LHO was hauled away by half the Dallas Police force? with no description of JFK's shooter or JD Tippet's shooter. Yet someone thought the shooter was a man who didnt pay to see a movie? Doesnt that seem like a big leap? someone knew just where to find him!

    • @jamesleverentz6294
      @jamesleverentz6294 2 роки тому

      Pretty sure the lady who called the cops DID give a description.
      Saying that, Oswald absolutely did not kill JFK.

    • @spicy7302
      @spicy7302 Рік тому

      ​​@@jamesleverentz6294 yeah, guess your mom did the job instead, right?

    • @owenkamp2001
      @owenkamp2001 2 місяці тому

      Well, actually the description of the man who shot JD Tippet, pretty much matches the description of Oswald except the weight of the man

  • @yfna1
    @yfna1 12 років тому +21

    Look at the disbelief on Oswald's face when he is told he has been charged with the murder of the president. 2:40

    • @bruceglover7971
      @bruceglover7971 2 роки тому

      I don't see that . As a CIA operative he is totally composed. He obviously IS realizing that he is being set up and shouts "I'm just a patsy" also later shouts "I vehemently deny these charges" HA HA it is over for you , you stupid fool.

  • @Rayoscope
    @Rayoscope 7 років тому +10

    4:47 - "I don't know what kind of facts you people have been given -- but I emphatically deny these charges!" The trial, had he lived, would have been a real barn burner. Without a doubt, the trial of the century.

    • @guddergo7116
      @guddergo7116 4 роки тому +5

      Easily, would have made oj look like mayberry.

  • @NoSeeMeUZionists
    @NoSeeMeUZionists 2 роки тому +36

    “I’m just a patsy.” He knew they set him up!

    • @Trumpinator-47
      @Trumpinator-47 2 роки тому +7

      And then they had old Jack shut him up!

    • @petersonlafollette3521
      @petersonlafollette3521 2 роки тому +1

      How could that comment not be followed up and disproved to eliminate credibility?

    • @anonymousapocalypse247
      @anonymousapocalypse247 Рік тому

      ​@@petersonlafollette3521exactly, and not a word to clear up that statement. Its probably classified info they will never let see the light of day

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому

      Yeah. They should have let him go because he said he was a patsy! You’re right!

  • @winstonsmith2237
    @winstonsmith2237 2 роки тому +3

    Dallas Police and FBI claimed that they took no NOTES during questioning of LHO. Marina Oswald told police that LHO owned a rifle at Ruth Paines home which was not found in garage.
    LHO likely knew of the conspiracy and may have facilitated those responsible but there was no gun shot residue on hands or face even though he was accused of firing 7 rounds. LHO attempted to make at least 2 out of state calls and they were obviously memorized numbers of his contacts with CIA who he felt could exonerate him. He also gave Ruth Paine a number to call but she didn't make it.
    LHO obviously figured out that he was set up as a PATSIE when 20 cops showed up in the Theater where he was likely trying to make contact with his CIA associate.
    Ruby gained access to Dallas Police that night when he showed up with bags full of deli sandwiches... surely he sought an opportunity to shoot LHO, same Saturday but he didn't get opportunity till Sunday.
    The Warren Commission claimed Ruby entered Dallas Police department through an auto ramp that was momentarily left ungarded and this is bullshit as the ramp and entry was guarded by several officers who were trying to back an armored car down the ramp and they then drove it out and backed up a car. Ruby was not filmed at the ramp entrance and must have gained entry with help from CIA or Dallas Police Department.
    Oswald kept his cool when he was asked questions by news media.. I have no doubt that he was a patsie but remained hopeful that his CIA connection would get him off the hook for 2 murders.

  • @legacyXplore
    @legacyXplore Рік тому +33

    The way he answers is interesting. The way he responded physically and not verbally when the reporter said “you have been charged” after he says he hasn’t been told anything is STRIKING. He looks pissed and you can see his mind racing. He was answering the way he did because he wasn’t sure how the powers that be were gonna navigate the situation. The minute he heard that he knew he was screwed and any assurances or plans he thought he was part of were completely fantasy. I don’t have the timelines and you can’t tell but I wouldn’t be surprised if his more aggressive denials came after that moment. And before that moment he was playing the more humble Im not sure what’s going on. I could be wrong but doubt I am. From all accounts early he acted not like a man falsely accused but of a man with a get out of jail free card. Or like a man than knew something that everyone else didn’t.

    • @jeffeverett274
      @jeffeverett274 Рік тому +5

      No transcripts of his arrest. Awful fishy.

    • @zx7-rr486
      @zx7-rr486 Рік тому

      @@jeffeverett274 Because the whole day was a tsunami of utter pandemonium and confusion. The station was total chaos - newsmen running amock everywhere - Jack Ruby waltzing in a few days later to shoot Oswald! I am sure that even by 1960s standards none of this was text book operating procedure - but the President had just been shot!
      As for Oswald's demeaner - oh you just can't read people that easily. That's how con men get you! He had a very odd personality and belief system. He had just killed an officer (of which there is no doubt) and yet he is bleating about being "hit by a policeman". A narcissistic fantasist loner who thought that he should have a higher purpose in life than he had - who saw an opportunity to do something truly shocking - and he took it. 100% guilty. No conspiracy. I know it's hard to accept that someone like Oswald could just shoot an iconic president - but if JFK insisted on getting up close and personal to the Dallas electorate, and swanning around in an open top motorcade - it becomes a very distinct reality!

    • @dr.woozie7500
      @dr.woozie7500 Рік тому +3

      @@jeffeverett274Dallas PD was “not in the possession of any tape recorders”

    • @caleschulz5019
      @caleschulz5019 Рік тому +1

      You are spot on

    • @mjsteier
      @mjsteier Рік тому +1

      Good post , noticed no comment from Aaronz on this one

  • @MrShanezanni
    @MrShanezanni 9 років тому +12

    Very Sad Violent Tragedy.

  • @Stryker20008
    @Stryker20008 2 роки тому +2

    3:51 - Is there any original audio here? Oswald is carrying on about something, but it's impossible to tell what he is saying.

    • @scod9746
      @scod9746 Рік тому

      the audio also repeats in 2 different visual parts, once in an early hall scene, and another in a later scene = someone says "o god we are going to have to indoctrinate these guys"

  • @AnObsoleteMan
    @AnObsoleteMan 14 років тому +36

    3:02
    Reporter: "Mr. Oswald, how did you heart your eye?"
    Oswald: " A policemen hit me"

    • @crashwatson7844
      @crashwatson7844 4 роки тому +15

      Story that last forever! I truly believe he is a Pasty! I hope he found peace in the next life.

    • @philwright2480
      @philwright2480 4 роки тому +5

      Heart?

    • @gfexc
      @gfexc 3 роки тому +1

      Hard not to get hit after killing a cop, and you pull a gun on other cops inside a movie theater. These days he would have been swiss cheese right there and then

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому

      @@crashwatson7844 i bet you crush on serial killers dont you, write them letters in prison type person.

    • @Brianfightingmad
      @Brianfightingmad 2 роки тому +5

      He killed a cop in front of witnesses.
      He tried killing someone a few weeks earlier.
      He had opportunity.
      The recreated scene proves He did it.
      People could see his rifle hanging out the window .
      1st shot He simply missed.
      Not easy committing murder.
      Zapruder starts filming after shot 1.
      Oswald has to wait until limo gets by tree. 2nd and 3rd shot.
      People below him on 5th floor heard shots above them and could hear casings hit floor.
      Oh and they even managed to have the casings land at same spots when they did the reenactment.
      Oliver stone obviously left that out of his movie.

  • @daniellinehan63
    @daniellinehan63 2 роки тому +7

    Did you see Ruby in the hallway?
    Chilling

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому

      It was not unusual for Ruby to hang around at the police station.

    • @mc5967
      @mc5967 10 місяців тому

      ​@@jetcat132 dude come on

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 10 місяців тому

      @@mc5967 Lol Seriously?

    • @holtridge7337
      @holtridge7337 17 днів тому

      Yep

  • @slide4180
    @slide4180 11 років тому +5

    2:50 - ".... the newspaper reporters in the hall AXED me that question." The earliest and whitest use I have ever heard of this particular malapropism.

  • @johnsain
    @johnsain Рік тому +2

    Is that Grand Central Station?

  • @Randomgal0000
    @Randomgal0000 5 років тому +10

    5:12 , "oh, we have to indoctrinate this guy," WTF?

    • @jaminteal
      @jaminteal 5 років тому

      I heard that too. What the heck

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому

      Indoctrinate : to imbue with a usually partisan or sectarian opinion, point of view, or principle.
      Boy, does that fit perfectly or what?

  • @sdhscrosscountry
    @sdhscrosscountry Рік тому +11

    I always felt sorry for him every time I watch this

    • @zx7-rr486
      @zx7-rr486 Рік тому

      Why? A double murderer? You must be the kind of person who would get taken in by a con man then. This guy had just murdered a policeman - and then bleats about "being hit by a policeman" like he's the victim! The reason he was hit is because he was strenuously resisting arrest in a theatre shortly after murdering officer Tippit! None of these are the actions of an innocent man. Oh, and he shot the President as well...

  • @johnrogers9481
    @johnrogers9481 6 років тому +4

    At 5:16 they are walking Oswald to go stand in a lineup. They have Oswald in a T-shirt, all the other men have nice shirts on. Oswald points this out saying, THEY have me dressed in a T-shirt so I'll be picked out, ISN'T THAT RIGHT.! A detective says, " THAT'S RIGHT ".!!!!

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому

      Hardly matters, every witness on the bus, in the taxi, at Tippit's murder, along Oswald's escape route to the theater and in the theater all very firmly ID'd Oswald, and more to the point all stuck with their conviction forever afterward. One of them commented he'd never forget that face, with his crazy expression....

    • @billieboybuddha4238
      @billieboybuddha4238 2 роки тому +1

      @@aaronz7056 Dont be so naive...

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому +1

      @@billieboybuddha4238 Whatever the heck that even means....

    • @omegaman6770
      @omegaman6770 Рік тому

      There were also witnesses in the Tippit case that said it wasn’t LHO so it goes both ways 🤷🏽‍♂️

  • @mikerotonda6264
    @mikerotonda6264 4 роки тому +5

    At 0:44 that's Jack ruby!!!that is a day before ruby actually kills Oswald....what the heck is Jack ruby, doing in the police station at the arrest of Oswald???

    • @mikerotonda6264
      @mikerotonda6264 4 роки тому +1

      Paul this whole thing is crazy! Iwasnt born when this happened and I remember in school they taught me jfk was assassinated...then when I got older and read about it, I would say to my dad, how the hell did the United States population but this shitburger? I mean, come on, this thing stinks, and I can't believe they took out a president.....then he would tell me that jfk, and bobby, ( mostly bobby). Had a lot of enemies.. ....but even still, I think the murder of jfk, in broad daylight, aside from pearl harbor and 9/11 was one of the worst events in our countries history.. And then your telling me when Oswald got shot, in broad daylight, on tv, the American people didn't know right there that something is seriously wrong with this

  • @rorymoore4387
    @rorymoore4387 2 роки тому +18

    Thanks for posting all that footage in one vid, saves me watching all the 1 minute clips.
    From what I can see I actually believe that he didn't do it, he seems sincere but sadly only person who knows for sure was the person who pulled the trigger and if it wasn't Oswald and they haven't been caught or come forward by now I doubt they ever will.

    • @rorymoore4387
      @rorymoore4387 Рік тому +2

      @ultradeadd yep and the ones that can have vested interest in not sharing details.
      It's shame, what makes me think he is innocent apart from his demeanour and sincerity is how quickly he was killed before a trial or further investigation.
      But 100% your right if there are any people left who have that info they won't talk but maybe a deathbed confession or letter left in a will could shed more light but that's highly unlikely.

    • @dansullivan8648
      @dansullivan8648 Рік тому +1

      He is a criminal and a liar and that's are facts. Can't believe we actually have to ask this question, did you know him and why would you believe him so easily? If you in fact do believe LHO with all of your heart, then you must believe 100% of all mankind. Period end of story. We will keep track of you because there is no way you trust every single human and if you stay with that story you have zero credibility.

    • @anonymousapocalypse247
      @anonymousapocalypse247 Рік тому

      Oswald is more believable than the untrustworthy gov(who lies often and is involved in espionage and assisting in over throwing other govs). They would never do anything unethical 🙄

  • @ronniebishop2496
    @ronniebishop2496 10 років тому +3

    What would you do if someone said, someday, one of your kids will just not come home from school, EVER? Or your wife will have a car accident, and may not survive? What would you do? You would do whatever they asked you to do. You had been a marine, you knew what they were capable of. Robert Oswald?

  • @1844Freddy
    @1844Freddy 14 років тому +14

    twenty four years old is young

    • @owenkamp2001
      @owenkamp2001 2 місяці тому +1

      Ikr like a lot of people thought he was in his mid to late thirties, but no he was only 24 years old

  • @zapdunga12
    @zapdunga12 Рік тому +4

    In his new book Buell Wesley Frazier finally admitted that right after the assassination he saw a man come out of the back of the Depository with a rifle in his hands that he placed in his trunk and drove away. When asked why he never told anyone in 59 years, he said he was not afraid for his own life, but for the lives of his family.

    • @johndavis5512
      @johndavis5512 Рік тому

      I thought he was in front of the buidling wathcing the motorcade and identified lovelady and also saw oswald walking across the street. Now he was behind the building? Or did this guy with the RIFLE get out slower then oswald and casually put it in the car. Keep in mind cops were all over that building by then and had already talked to even oswald. Now we are to believe a guy just strolled down and put his gun away. But oswald barely had time to drop his in between some boxes and get to the lunch room?

    • @owenkamp2001
      @owenkamp2001 2 місяці тому

      Did he say if the man looked like Oswald, and when did he say this

  • @mmangum4444
    @mmangum4444 15 років тому +38

    @MoJoSB
    classic setup. the expression on his face says it all...

    • @doug9066
      @doug9066 3 роки тому +1

      Yep your so right

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому

      Hey, I was MoJoSB... Changed my name... lol Stll have the SB as you can see.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому

      Which expression, his passive look or the smirk he kept putting on?

  • @giovannigiaco5238
    @giovannigiaco5238 11 років тому +25

    Poor guy, used a patsy. Who grieves for Lee Harvey Oswald? Nobody.

    • @LunaFly906
      @LunaFly906 11 років тому +1

      NOT YET!

    • @VettaBoop
      @VettaBoop 11 років тому +5

      I fell bad for him... The freaking government used and him and killed him!!!

    • @BullToTheShit
      @BullToTheShit 11 років тому +2

      >"Who grieves for Lee Harvey Oswald?"
      His family, but nobody else should. He ruined his wife & kids lives & the Kennedy's.

    • @VettaBoop
      @VettaBoop 11 років тому +1

      BullToTheShit I mean anybody can grieve for him, its a free country...

    • @BullToTheShit
      @BullToTheShit 11 років тому +1

      Lavetta Thomas "Should" & "Can" are two different words. Nobody is suggesting you can't.

  • @jlkyga
    @jlkyga 12 років тому +10

    If they hadn't been up to something they would have given him a legal representator

    • @dolnick7
      @dolnick7 Рік тому

      The police allowed the local civil liberties union rep in Dallas to speak with Oswald who denied their services and allowed Oswald numerous attempts to contact a lawyer of his choice in upstate NY but he was away and never got the messages. Two words of advice: Stop getting your information from conspiracy books and stop believing that everything Oswald said was the truth. He lied throughout his entire life and didn't stop doing so on November 22nd.

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому

      He turned down their offer and tried to contact a different attorney.

  • @SummersTimeEntertainment
    @SummersTimeEntertainment 4 роки тому +8

    0:43 Jack Ruby. SMH. Oswald was set up!

  • @eattherich1111
    @eattherich1111 4 роки тому +21

    I cannot imagine the last moments of Oswald's life. How cornered and scared he was. Not having legal representation, is taking away rights for a human despite the accusations. Kind of like a witch hunt. Right there, constitutes for a massive cover up.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому +4

      "Cornered and scared?" He was passive, didn't even protest his innocence to his own family, and could barely keep the smug, self-satisfied smirk off his face whenever he was photographed.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому +2

      @Richard Stephens "He said that." Oh, well, that changes everything. Good to know all a criminal has to do is say "I didn't do it" for that to be taken as conclusive evidence of his innocence. lol
      Oswald was a violent child whose mother refused to get him help and told him constantly what a burden he was to her growing up. He was teased and bullied in the Marines but was a good marksman. He had a huge chip on his shoulder, hated America, defected, guilt-tripped the Russians into letting him remain by slashing his own wrist, hated it in Russia, returned to America with a wife he was abusing, made her take photos of him with his guns (and he proudly showed those photos off), left instructions for Marina what to do if he didn't return from taking a shot at Gen. Walker (and was devastated to learn he screwed that up), tried to defect to Cuba only weeks before the JFK assassination in order to fight for Castro, was turned down, was kicked out of the Russian embassy after they turned him down to return to Russia, and his wife finally left him. The night of Nov 23, he suddenly showed up at the house she was staying at, stayed over, was told by her there would be no reconciliation, and in the morning left behind his wedding ring and most of his money. He smuggled his rifle out of its storage place in the garage, lied about it being a package containing curtain rods he didn't need (and no rods were ever found by anyone), and hastily smuggled it into the TSBD. After the assassination, which computer analysis (for one) has demonstrated consisted of 3 shots fired squarely from his window, he was the only employee to immediately walk off his job without telling anyone, took evasive action back to his rooming house (3 witnesses firmly ID"d him making this journey), ignored the taxi driver when he asked what the chaos in the streets was about, ignored his landlady when she told him the stunning news of the assassination, popped into his room just long enough to grab his handgun, and, knowing it was just a matter of time before he was tracked down, started walking, playing out his own endgame. A long chain of witnesses firmly ID"d him at the scene of Tippit's killing and along his route into the theater, where he promptly tried to shoot the first officer to approach him and fought like a demon as he was subdued. He was arrogant and tight-lipped in custody. His wife and brother visited him and forever afterward firmly stated they knew at once he was guilty from his smug, cat-that-swallowed-the-canary demeanor. Given a chance to address a live tv audience, he displayed no particular horror regarding the two murders, did not jump up and down screaming his innocence, did not beg protection for his family as though he were under coercion, did not spill any beans regarding a conspiracy whatsoever, just made a throwaway response when asked about his eye "a policeman hit me" [as he disarmed Oswald as he tried to shoot him.] Even when his mugshot was taken he had a perfectly smug look on his face. He was so looking forward to being a living legend at his trial, and he would laugh himself silly seeing modern-day armchair detectives absolving this punk of his guilt and instead foisting it on a country and a system he had come to hate so much.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому

      @Richard Stephens That's "who," not "how.," and by the way, "jackass" is one word.
      So you couldn't answer, much less persuasively explain away, a single one of all the points I made above, just called me a name? The Warren Commission's lawyers wouldn't have stood a chance against you in court!
      Oswald, warped as he was, wanted to lash back out at the world. Everything about this human time-bomb's biography is consistent with this. How does your average modern mass killer benefit from shooting up a concert or a schoolyard?
      As for LBJ, since JFK hadn't even made up his mind what to do about Vietnam yet, presumably this was all a sinister plot to put LBJ in place so he could... pass more civil rights legislation than JFK ever would have attempted. The fiend! Also if LBJ "organized" the assassination he would then spend his entire Presidency a complete hostage to his co-conspirators and would forever be aware that any day, at any minute, somebody might crack and expose him, and if they were happy enough to kill JFK why would he have an ounce of trust that these guys wouldn't screw him too?
      "Brainwashed idiots" still await a persuasive explanation of the following problem:
      A conspiracy out to frame Oswald for killing Tippit would have to be absolutely certain in advance of the following things:
      (a) That they can find a double for him so similar in looks and wardrobe to fool everyone
      (b) Oswald will successfully escape the TSBD (and, indeed, leave it at all) and make for his rooming house
      (c) Innocent man Oswald will pick up his gun and put on the right jacket at the last minute
      (d) There will be a cop driving at 10th and Patton at exactly the right moment between Oswald being at the rooming house and at the theater for Oswald to be plausibly blamed for killing him
      (e) That Tippit won't get lucky, outdraw the double, and kill or capture him instead
      (f) That nobody will ever see the real killer anywhere else in the neighbourhood as he makes his escape
      (g) That nobody will see the real Oswald anywhere but at 10th and Patton and clear him
      (h) That Oswald will be unable to prove he was anywhere other than at 10th and Patton during the shooting
      (i) That every possible witness in this quiet suburban neighbourhood can be successfully pressured and threatened to lie their butts off to authorities and the media and remain silent about it all for the rest of their lives, for generations to come
      (j) That Oswald will helpfully make himself look guilty by trying to murder Officer MacDonald in the theater before many witnesses only minutes later, virtually counting as a suicide-by-cop attempt (instead they fought him, kept him alive and rescued him from the lynch mob outside at their own personal risk)
      (k) That Oswald won't say one single, concrete word about being framed for killing Tippit by a conspiracy to anyone, including his family and an audience of millions while appearing on live TV that same night
      (l) That members of the Dallas P.D. can be successfully approached and recruited to put their own careers and lives on the line for no gain whatsoever by falsifying evidence, threatening witnesses, screwing around with line-ups, messing around with ballistics, and generally helping the real killer of a respected and decorated brother officer (with a wife and children) go scot free while they cheerfully help frame some innocent guy they don't even know for the crime, and that they will all remain so loyal to this unstable conspiracy they don't need to sweat any of them ever cracking and confessing or fingering them for the next 58 years
      (m) That all of this insanely complicated and risky plotting and framing of a guy who's already being hunted for killing JFK and fleeing the TSBD, by means of yet another murder, of a police officer, where any number of things might well go horribly wrong for them and just end up confirming a conspiracy, requiring more cover-ups piled atop more cover-ups, is even worth the trouble in the first place.

    • @easternyellowjacket276
      @easternyellowjacket276 Рік тому

      It looked to me like he was finally enjoying the attention he brought upon himself for the first time in his life. Nobody showed up to his funeral. He had no friends. He was finally a star. You can see the smugness on his face. He doesn't looked scared at all.

  • @theauthorparrishgorejack6409
    @theauthorparrishgorejack6409 8 років тому +7

    I have never in my life heard nor seen or even dreamed of anything even close to the circus of event's that unfolded while Oswald was in custody. I mean, he was literally dragged in front of journalist and cameras so the public could have a face with which to vent their hate and anger. I mean wtf!?!?!? Was there no one in control of this mob of reporters and media?!?!?!? It was a damn flying circus from day one and every single Dallas police officer was the clown!!!!!

    • @buttfartmcgee4013
      @buttfartmcgee4013 8 років тому

      the fucking president got shot who wouldnt be pissed

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому

      "So the public could have a face with which to vent their hate and anger." What "venting" exactly are we talking about?

  • @brubeatle
    @brubeatle Місяць тому

    2:06 You can tell his face is like oh my God, they are going to blame me for the whole thing .He was part of it; or was trying to inform to the cia or the fbi about the assassination.

  • @firestar7188
    @firestar7188 2 роки тому +3

    The Press already had lots of information on Lee ( Harvey ) Oswald, a just arested unknown person.
    They knew he was a ex marine also that he lived in the Sovjet Union

  • @Dana_inc
    @Dana_inc Рік тому +8

    He’s to calm! If someone was accusing me of the crime of the century I couldn’t act that calm.

    • @69weed.420
      @69weed.420 Рік тому

      Like Jim Garrison said, "Oswald didn't shoot anybody."
      Period.
      Thankfully, today, this view has the collective conscience. I believe it's because we're smarter, in general but especially critical thinking, than prior generations who were stuck with basic Neanderthalic brains. I mean just listen to good ole boy chief curry if you wanna hear the next closest thing to the iQ of rocks. I'm saying he's a low iQ Person but so were most people in the 50s. They were easy to fool because they just weren't that bright. Soy milk hadn't even been invented yet.

    • @benjamincotton2787
      @benjamincotton2787 Рік тому

      *too

    • @anonymousapocalypse247
      @anonymousapocalypse247 Рік тому

      He was a soldier. They are trained to keep their composure

    • @xCaptxCrunchx
      @xCaptxCrunchx Рік тому +4

      He is calm because he has the proof that he is innocent and was going to prove it in court.

    • @spicy7302
      @spicy7302 Рік тому +2

      ​@@xCaptxCrunchx And the proof he was innocent is: no verifiable alibi at the moment of the shooting of JFK or Tippit, a gun that was purchased by him which fired three shots at the president from the building HE worked in, on the floor he was LAST seen on by coworkers, running away from the crime scene to grab a gun and shoot Tippit and being seen by a bunch of people, having the same exact description as the JFK shooter, his fingerprints being found all over the nest he shot from, his gun wasn't at his home when the police checked, him changing his usual routine before the shooting and coming to work with a bag which carried the gun, the time tests which demonstrated that he could have went from the 6th floor to the 2nd floor in just enough time to encounter the superintendent of the building and the officer there and so on and so forth. What an innocent man, defended by so much evidence 🤡

  • @lindaeasley5606
    @lindaeasley5606 Рік тому +6

    I've read alot about the handling of the case in the aftermath of the assassination and it's astounding how sloppily things unfolded. From police making statements to the media about evidence and witnesses to the choice to bring Oswald into such an unsecure area
    They let anyone and their grandmother walk in and out of the Dallas Police station
    If he had not been assassinated ,with a good lawyer there would've been a mistrial

    • @zx7-rr486
      @zx7-rr486 Рік тому

      Yes - it was a total sh!t show. Somehow I think that even in the 1960s this wasn't "standard operating procedure" in the Dallas police station. The chief officer should have locked down the building, and kicked EVERYBODY out who wasn't a police officer. That is what would happen today of course.
      Personally I think Oswald was guilty as hell, a narcissistic fantasist political idealist loner who thought he deserved a higher purpose in life than he had. He saw an opportunity to do something truly shocking - and he took it. I'll bet he was ice cool when he pulled the trigger because he really believed in his fantasist political ideology. The way he bleats about being "hit by a policeman" when only moments prior he had shot a policeman to death shows what a delusional self pitying narcissist he was.
      What makes me laugh is why people try and make out this guy was innocent. These nonsense conspiracy theories: why would ANY serious agency, or even the mafia, involve a thoroughly unreliable and psychologically unstable individual like Oswald to be part of a conspiracy to kill the President. He's the LAST person you would want to involve!! Not to mention all the multiple failure points of such a convoluted plan.
      You may be right about a clever lawyer getting him off on legal technicalities though ...... had he lived and been tried.

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому

      The Dallas PD was in over their heads on this. They were ill prepared to handle how monumental it was, but they mostly got it right.

    • @BazookaTooth707
      @BazookaTooth707 Рік тому +1

      ​​@@jetcat132No they didn't. They failed to protect the rights of an American citizen and the integrity of the biggest case in American history with their complete lack of professionalism for the reasons mentioned above. The fact that Jack Ruby was close to a lot of officers in the Dallas Police Department says a lot in itself.
      They had no regard for Oswald's safety. He allegedly killed one of their own, killed the president, and shot their state governor-which is why I believe Oswald when he mentions an officer hit him. Let's be real here. Many police departments of big American cities in the 1960's were incredibly corrupt, and I wish I could say it was different now.
      As the OP mentioned Oswald could've received a mistrial. He clearly asked for legal representation but never received it-at least up to the point where he speaks to the media. That alone would've spelled disaster for the Dallas Police Department.

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому +1

      @@BazookaTooth707 That’s fine, but in reality, I can certainly see how that happened in the chaos and pressure of those chaotic hours following the assassination.
      Ruby was surely an informant and at times a host to members of the Dallas PD.
      He obviously ingratiated himself to them, and in those days was probably considered pretty harmless. He blended in with the crush of reporters and photographers, and was hardly noticed. I agree with you as well that no big city police department is a shining example of professionalism, even today. They’re human beings just like everyone else, and subject to the same societal sins.
      I think that today Oswald would never have been dragged around the building the way he was, but I hardly think they were propping him up to be killed. That event likely changed the way all high profile prisoners are moved around from a security standpoint, including wearing bullet proof vests during transport.
      In 1963 Texas, I don’t believe there were Miranda rights yet, so I’m not surprised that law enforcement in this case would take advantage of the opportunity to interrogate Oswald. However, by all accounts, Oswald turned down at least one offer of representation from H.Louis Nichols, a Dallas attorney who went to speak to him. Oswald stated to Nichols that he wanted John Abt, an attorney from New York. Abt was associated with the American Civil Liberties Union and a member of the communist party. Nichols asked Oswald if he wanted him or a Dallas lawyer to represent him, and Oswald stated "No, not right now." That is Nichols account of his meeting with Oswald. My understanding is that Marina apparently attempted to contact Abt, but he wasn’t available.
      There was also a ton of external pressure on the Dallas PD at the time from the Whitehouse, FBI, the press, and possibly even the Kennedy family. I’m sure it all contributed to any protocols they may have violated that weekend.
      And he got the shit knocked out of him because he violently resisted arrest and tried to shoot another cop. He didn’t get roughed up in jail. He was smug and uncooperative, and was playing it to the hilt during those impromptu press conferences.
      I do respect what you’re saying and agree with much of it. The Dallas Police may have terribly dropped the ball that weekend, but so did a lot of other agencies. And in the end, I believe they got it right, Oswald killed both Kennedy and Tippit, and that was my original point.

    • @BazookaTooth707
      @BazookaTooth707 Рік тому

      @@jetcat132 At this point it seems we are splitting hairs, respectively. We could go ad nauseum on the nuances, discrepancies, and facts of the case. Although, I would like to add that Oswald was already known to the public as a marxist. This meant he was an easy target, or at the least very unlikely to get fair treatment from his fellow Americans-especially in Dallas.
      At the end of the day Oswald never got a fair trial. We will never know his side of the story. Knowing what we know now-even though they have yet to release the JFK files-the Warren Commission didn't receive all the evidence that was gathered by the intelligence community and was misled with fabricated evidence.
      For example, Allen Dulles was well aware that Oswald was an intelligence asset, yet he omitted that from the Warren Commission. We know now that the FBI was keeping tabs on Oswald via a mailing campaign months before the assassination.
      Another example would be the key pieces of evidence placing Oswald in Mexico City. Turns out this evidence never actually existed, as proven in a relatively recent court finding. The pieces of evidence I'm referring to are the pictures of Oswald at the Russian embassy in Mexico City, as well as a recorded phone call he allegedly made from the same embassy.
      I appreciate your comment. You made very valid points about Miranda rights (or lack there of) and about Oswald turning down legal representation, as well as the chaotic atmosphere surrounding the event. But, as I mentioned above he was likely only to get fair treatment from someone more politically aligned. The final thing I would like to say is that I won't easily dismiss the idea that the Dallas Police had something extra going on. Officers were known to frequent Ruby's establishment. Did they want Oswald dead? Idk. But I do know that the best scapegoat is a dead one.

  • @pba1957
    @pba1957 11 років тому +21

    The Central Park Jogger case is a classic example of zealous police officers trying to solve a crime in a hurry. Why would they moments after arresting Oswald charge him with the crime without having solid evidence against him. Folks wanted an answer so they created one around Oswald since it was the most convenient. Oswald was consistent about one thing. Declaring that he was falsely accused, yet so many arrogant people today claim he is guilty with only circumstantial evidence.
    How many man have gone to death row in our time based on circumstantial evidence. This case against Oswald is no different from the Salem Witch Trials yet so many people turn a blind eye to it.

    • @MrAmbassador11
      @MrAmbassador11 10 років тому +5

      J.E.Hoover called the Dallas Police Department a couple hours or so after the assassination to tell them to discontinue their investigation. He tells them that the man they have in custody is the man who killed President Kennedy.The suspect was in Dallas and Mr. Hoover was in Washington D.C. so how could he possibly know that?

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому

      For starters they could charge him with trying to kill a cop as soon as he was approached in the theater.
      "Circumstantial evidence...." The case against him is open and shut.

    • @Firearcher4
      @Firearcher4 2 роки тому

      I totally agree with you. He WAS innocent.

    • @omegaman6770
      @omegaman6770 Рік тому

      If the case is “Open and Shut” as you say then WHY are the JFK assassination files still being with held from the American people 60 years later ? Should be no reason for it as “ We The People “ have a right to know !

  • @WisdomWeaverBitcoinBruv
    @WisdomWeaverBitcoinBruv Рік тому

    At 2:55 you can clearly see the face of a man who’s just realised he won’t live to see the creation of Pornhub. He’s all, “Ugh, shoot me now” and Jack’s like, “I gotchu, fam!”

  • @Mina-te5qi
    @Mina-te5qi 9 років тому +16

    You know what's weird? My first name is Marina, but if I would have been a boy, my parents were planning on naming me Lee.

    • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
      @TheCShowHostedbyChris 9 років тому +1

      Really that's so neat. Is that why your interested in the case?

    • @Mina-te5qi
      @Mina-te5qi 9 років тому +3

      Chris Peeks Nah it's just a coincidence. But I'm a total history nerd. I've been to the museum in Dallas which was really cool.

    • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
      @TheCShowHostedbyChris 9 років тому +1

      Mina 12 I have a degree in history never been to the museum. Was it cool?

    • @Mina-te5qi
      @Mina-te5qi 9 років тому +2

      Chris Peeks Yeah it was really interesting. You could look out the windows and they had two little x's on the road marking exactly where he was shot.

    • @rexoates4484
      @rexoates4484 9 років тому +1

      +Chris Peeks Yes it is. I live about 75 miles north of Dallas and have been there twice. It's well worth seeing.

  • @JesseJesseJesseJesseJesseJD
    @JesseJesseJesseJesseJesseJD 9 років тому +28

    I think he was framed

    • @owenkamp2001
      @owenkamp2001 2 місяці тому

      Unfortunately, we will probably never know

    • @krob2327
      @krob2327 Місяць тому

      He wasn’t.

  • @sdhscrosscountry
    @sdhscrosscountry Рік тому +4

    Oswald is asking for help , every chance he got.

  • @Borella309
    @Borella309 2 роки тому +1

    Jack Ruby standing around at the 0:44 mark (of this video). Later on Jack Ruby will be filmed at a press conference, AND PROVIDING commentary, and on the Sunday morning gets filmed again from many angles, shooting Oswald. All this happens on the Dallas Police Department's premises. Am I the only one scratching my head?

  • @KrushingDeception
    @KrushingDeception 4 роки тому +22

    So sad, the man never had a chance!

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 2 роки тому

      Yeah, when you have to try to shoot a cop in a theater, what are you gonna do?

    • @Ur2ez4me81
      @Ur2ez4me81 2 роки тому +1

      Neither did JFK

    • @KrushingDeception
      @KrushingDeception 2 роки тому

      @@Ur2ez4me81 JFK faked his assassination.

  • @BrandonMelvinDrums
    @BrandonMelvinDrums 2 роки тому +11

    It's hard to imagine how ANYONE still believes Oswald had anything to do with Kennedy's assassination.

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому +2

      How so, I can't wait to hear your thoughts on this.

    • @Paul-km8ko
      @Paul-km8ko 2 роки тому +2

      @@leemoore9933 you realize oswald had a double, right? who shots a president, escapes from the scene of the crime and manages to make it home safely, only to change his clothes and go back out so he can shot a cop and then walk blocks to a movie theater, doesn't buy a ticket, but decides he'll just walk in without paying - like that won't draw attention to him. If you believe all that than you are a sucker

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому +1

      @@Paul-km8ko He only had one double, I thought he had several. Chief from Control offered him a job but they only had the one shoe phone and it was Max's. Then Kaos wanted him.

    • @lukeatbrandynightful
      @lukeatbrandynightful 2 роки тому

      he deffo was one of the shooters, I heard there was 8

    • @leemoore9933
      @leemoore9933 2 роки тому

      @@lukeatbrandynightful I heard there were 178 shooters in dealy. Some with cap and ball muskets.

  • @liten48
    @liten48 12 років тому +4

    i could tell by the look on oswald face , when the reporter told him he had been charged with jfk murder, that he didnt do it

    • @57Koba
      @57Koba 3 роки тому +1

      Well then, they should have let him go right then. Why didn't you call them with your definitive proof?

  • @drby0788
    @drby0788 4 роки тому +5

    One of the main motives supported by lone oswald supporters, was that he did it for attention, to be recognized. Does this mans reactions match that description? Gerald Posner has been trying to drive this home for decades...yet every action of Oswalds supports the total opposite..I see a confused, scared man in these clips..I see a man who realizes the situation he's in, and he's clearly dumbfounded on what to do about it.

    • @InternationalScot
      @InternationalScot 4 роки тому +1

      Absolutely right. The look on his face is one of the realisation that he’s been had. Many of us have made that same face when we realise that someone has used us, lied to us, conned us. It’s a clear sign of his innocence.

  • @jamesbryant8677
    @jamesbryant8677 2 роки тому +1

    Was that Jack Ruby at the 48 second mark not wearing his hat?

  • @felicitymc8200
    @felicitymc8200 4 роки тому +10

    5:23 ‘oh god we’ve got to indoctrinate this guy!’

  • @lostyears5256
    @lostyears5256 Рік тому +21

    You can hear and see the innocence on his face and in his voice!

    • @Frogwatchers
      @Frogwatchers Рік тому +1

      Look at the video I found when they did the fourth line up. They took his dress shirt and left him in a white t. Very unusual for that time

    • @isthme8103
      @isthme8103 6 місяців тому

      Nigga killed a police man and you call him innocent!?

  • @PhillipCreeper
    @PhillipCreeper 11 років тому +4

    Poor security by the Dallas Police Department.

  • @grinningchicken
    @grinningchicken 11 років тому +11

    Oswald stage 1. Confused and isn't sure of what they are trying to pin on him but confident he will not be charged and let go mostly concerned he hasn't had a chance to get a lawyer.
    2. Defiant as he realizes he is being unjustly going charged with killing a police man. but he was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. He is rather certain at the 2nd accusation of him killing the president is some crazy rumor.
    3.Genuine afraid when he realizes the shit has hit the fan he is being railroaded and charged with both murdering a police officer and the president

    • @klrdotorg
      @klrdotorg 11 років тому +1

      Is that what you consider evidence?

    • @grinningchicken
      @grinningchicken 11 років тому +1

      klrdotorg
      What do you care?

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому

      Unjustly charged.... So a mystery man who was his exact double, and who instantly disappeared without a trace, just happened to shoot Tippit at a location midway between Oswald's rooming house and the theater, and was seen be a steady chain of witnesses dong the shooting and fleeing, at EXACTLY the right moment so that Oswald could be plausibly blamed for it. Those conspirators sure were lucky all those suburban homeowners in the neighbourhood could be counted on so reliably to claim Oswald was the man they saw for the rest of their lives...

  • @jabberjaw2567
    @jabberjaw2567 Рік тому +1

    Jack Ruby is standing in the hallway during a hallway scene. At frame 5:39 Oswald is signaling someone by mouthing a silent statement to unknown persons. Need lip reading analysis. Very interesting

  • @williamblair9597
    @williamblair9597 2 роки тому +3

    This is how you never handle security on a high profile controversial suspect.

  • @geoffm9944
    @geoffm9944 2 роки тому +3

    The very large crowd of reporters and TV newsmen, jostling and pushing in the corridors, presented a chaotic scene, which led to Oswald and police investigators having to ‘run the gauntlet’ through a ‘sea of people.’ This media circus was totally unacceptable and impacted upon the police and FBI cross examinations. Police officers and investigators were actively being harassed by the media, while moving Oswald around from room to room. The two days of allowing reporters into the building, turned the whole thing into a media circus. Curry and Fritz have to take full responsibility for not expelling all the newsmen and hence compromising Oswald’s personal security. Both men should have had the intelligence, after dismissing all the newsmen from the building, to have put Oswald into a sealed and armoured vehicle, and then be driven off to the country jail.

  • @danielmurphy4429
    @danielmurphy4429 Рік тому +4

    What a disgrace, put on by the “finest” of the Dallas police department. They paraded the ‘supposed lone assassin’ of the president through crowded hallways trying to give Jack Ruby an opportunity to do his part. In one segment Oswald isn’t even cuffed! Perhaps the authorities were hoping he’d attempt escape and they’d shoot him dead on the spot. I also noticed the taller detective in the light colored suit, the same suit he’d wear the next day while escorting Oswald to be shot by Jack Ruby. Something about his suit always seemed a bit odd to me, since all the other men wore dark suits. Then I realized he was Ruby’s signal of how close Oswald was getting to the muzzle of his pistol.

    • @stevenmcghee6649
      @stevenmcghee6649 Рік тому +1

      Jim Leavelle's suit is held in the National Archives. As is Jackie Kennedy's pink suit (though that's not available to the public).

    • @Firearcher4
      @Firearcher4 Рік тому

      I agree. Ruby was waiting across the street minutes before LHO came down the elevator. that is proved. levealle passes by a window. Ruby see the bright suit. Its a signal and then races over to the basement. A horn honks EXACTLY the moment LHO enters the basement next to the man in the bright suit - Jim Leveale. Ruby's queue to attack. I think Jim was in on it

  • @susanyoung6632
    @susanyoung6632 Рік тому +11

    "I didnt shoot anybody" and I believe him 100%

    • @spicy7302
      @spicy7302 Рік тому +1

      He murdered two people with cruelty. Unfortunately, his wretched life was put out too early for him to admit doing so.

    • @Firearcher4
      @Firearcher4 Рік тому

      @@spicy7302 There is no proof he did and there IS proof which shows he was innocent.. Furthermore there is a mountain of evidence proving that branches of the US government were behind it. There is also evidence that Israel were the masterminds behind the entire thing

  • @chadcarlson6142
    @chadcarlson6142 6 років тому +17

    Yes, he was pretty cool in answering questions...especially when accused of killing the most powerful man in the free world.

    • @jdig1984
      @jdig1984 3 роки тому +3

      Cia trained I think he realised that he was fall guy. The whole scene is bizarre the way they were moving him about the police station letting his wife in the press had the whole back story of the defection to Russia it was if they wanted the public inside that this guy deserved to be shot whilst in custody before he could stand trial

    • @chadcarlson6142
      @chadcarlson6142 3 роки тому +2

      @@jdig1984 Plus he just happened to learn the Russian language in the Marines.

    • @ronniecozzi8385
      @ronniecozzi8385 3 роки тому +2

      Because he knew he was innocent and expected justice.

    • @swankybutters8371
      @swankybutters8371 3 роки тому

      @@ronniecozzi8385 That poor guy...

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому +1

      @@ronniecozzi8385 Ignoring the mountain of overwhelming evidence against him of course, but presumably everybody on the face of the earth was out to frame him....

  • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
    @TheCShowHostedbyChris 9 років тому +30

    If anyone actually look at the time lines of oswald being encountered officer break room, tippit shooting, and being arrested in the theatre it's easy to see he was innocent.

    • @gregoryklein3311
      @gregoryklein3311 5 років тому +5

      And not to mention. [but I will] the other Oswald. Check out John Armstrong's book Harvey and Lee.

    • @aaronz7056
      @aaronz7056 3 роки тому +9

      Actually a solid chain of witnesses firmly demonstrate he was guilty. What, some Oswald clone somehow knew a cop was going to be between Oswald's rooming house and the theater at exactly the right moment for Oswald to be framed for that shooting, and luckily NOBODY saw the "real" Oswald anywhere else at that time? And the double apparently had the same gun Oswald picked up at his rooming house, and still on him when he was arrested..?

    • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
      @TheCShowHostedbyChris 3 роки тому +1

      @@gregoryklein3311 that's good got the bunk 20 years before it was written when he claimed there was a long body and Oswald's grave and made already exhumed it

    • @TheCShowHostedbyChris
      @TheCShowHostedbyChris 3 роки тому +1

      @@aaronz7056 I agree now he is guilty I change my mind

    • @judythbaker4344
      @judythbaker4344 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheCShowHostedbyChris you didn't change your mind, I know you well, Chris.

  • @oscarrobert4725
    @oscarrobert4725 2 роки тому +19

    Lee Harvey Oswald was not only innocent, it appears he was trying to stop the assassination. Truly tragic. For him, but also the entire world

    • @travels129
      @travels129 2 роки тому +1

      Listen he shot officer tippit to punk

    • @SuzukiYNathie
      @SuzukiYNathie Рік тому +3

      Oswald was as guilty as guilty can be. It would be harder to find any defendant with MORE evidence against him than Oswald

    • @Gigi1111Layna
      @Gigi1111Layna Рік тому

      @@SuzukiYNathie Grow a brain. Or study the facts. You just have no idea and accept whatever they tell you.

    • @figmentofyourimagination5359
      @figmentofyourimagination5359 Рік тому +2

      LHO was definitely in on it. He didn't shoot anyone though.

    • @spicy7302
      @spicy7302 Рік тому

      ​@@figmentofyourimagination5359 he definitely did shoot 2 people dead, as people proved time and time again, yet you braindead clowns can't resist introducing conspiracies in this

  • @TheOriginalMoc
    @TheOriginalMoc 9 років тому +14

    even though im not American and this happened 25 years before I was born I cant deny that it effected me greatly to know something like this could actually happen' it just all seems a little bit fishy to me to think one man could do that amount of damage.

  • @michaeldomeier9225
    @michaeldomeier9225 8 років тому +6

    Just before they escort Oswald out into the hall at the police station, at about 5:16, you clearly hear someone off camera say, "Oh God, now we gotta indoctrinate this guy." Anyone notice that before or have a clue what he's referring to?

    • @donrichardson5626
      @donrichardson5626 3 роки тому

      REPORTERS WERE SCRAMBLING AROUND LIKE A STAMPEDE OF ELEPHANTS...
      THE REPORTER WAS SAYING THAT, THE REPORTER NEEDS TO BE BRIEFED WHEN NOT TO GET IN THE WAY OF THE CAMERA AND THE SUSPECT AS TO NOT BLOCK OFF THE VIEW...ANY MAYBE SHOOT A FEW GOOD QUESTIONS TO LHO
      BEFORE HE DIES...REPORTER
      ETIQUETTE...

    • @scod9746
      @scod9746 Рік тому

      it repeats so its spliced on 2 different visuals

    • @jetcat132
      @jetcat132 Рік тому

      It speaks to his impulsive nature.

  • @Stryker20008
    @Stryker20008 11 місяців тому +1

    5:09 So this is one smoking gun. Look at Oswalds facial expression in this moment. This is a departure from the smug, confident Oswald we see at other times in his young life. Here is looks genially concerned. He realizes what is happening. He IS being taken in front of a line up and it IS a set up so he WILL be picked out. Look at him as he is pushed through the door. He is just beginning to feel the weight, of something being wrong. Something he did not see coming, which is now out of his control. Maybe he is thinking after he is "PICKED OUT" he will be rescued. But nope. This is a very important piece of video and should be looked at more.

  • @williamjarman9076
    @williamjarman9076 2 роки тому +2

    This was handled so unprofessionally so many people around Oswald , there shouldn't have been.

  • @pcsbeat
    @pcsbeat 11 років тому +4

    Lee was/is an American hero.