OJ contradicted himself???? All of the detectives REPEATEDLY got caught either lying or contradicting themselves or others. Did you even watch the trial???? It's on UA-cam in its entirety. Countless hours of prosecution witnesses contradicting themselves, each other and logic. For example, why didn't OJ use a gun? He owned one. And you can't say he was worried about being caught.... Because he supposedly left a bloody bronco parked out in the street.
By his own admission, he said he was wearing the Reeboks the night before. But, if you Google “OJ at dance recital” images, he’s wearing what appear to be black “Bruno Magli” shoes.
Ridiculous ...How would you be able to get close enough definitively identify Those particular brands of foreign shoes? .....im really sure that me personally would be able do that....plus, now days you'd have to Qualify as an expert. . does that make sense?
@@daviddavis3389 Key words were “ appear to be”. He isn’t wearing white Reeboks as he said was which is why Tom Lange took those particular shoes with him.
who told you he is a murderer, he was not convicted, and secondly did you ever think who else could have done that ? You beat your wife does NOT make you a murderer. Many people use to beat their wives and still do, but murder is a different level. I think that he might have tell someone to do it….maybe, but remember that there was a women who lived with Nicole brown that was a heavy drug user, and the way they were killed, might point to a drug deal situation , the throat cutting is made by a pro, not a mad husband….
@@sega62sThe evidence OJ dripping blood from that cut knucle in his sixe 12 bruno malli shoes. Come on nobody is that stupid. The jury just let him go it's just that simple.
not just in the usa, no-justice, light sentences, harsh sentences happen all over the world unfortunately. one thing is for sure- you hvae to be rich and non political to get guaranteed justice
@@Romulan2469 without the brilliance & the LAPD, ( especially Lange Vannatter this case would have not been solved..without the effort of these officer, + Lange where would we be?
@@socialoutkast5657 Many. A good example is covering Nicole's body with that blanket therefore contaminating the crime scene purely for the purpose of stopping the media taking photographs and videos. Or how about Lange carrying the Reebok shoes without gloves under his arm and taking them home with him. Vannatter bringing OJ's blood to Rockingham to book it in with the criminalist instead of taking it to the lab. Wearing no protective covering on their shoes before trampling all over that crime scene. I could go on all day but you get the point!
He screwed up big time with that blanket taken from Nicole's condo to cover her body. That blood drop evidence on her back was crucial to identifying the killer and it was all lost due to poor crime scene investigation techniques which the defense used to their advantage to set him free.
Good for Tom Lange still speaking out about what happened that night. He’s heard a lot said about his partner Phil Vanatter in the years since he passed, and always came forward to speak up for him
@@daviddavis3389 really smart? Left his blood all over the crime scene, in his car and in clothing on his socks in his home. Cant remember where he got cut less than 24 hours before then blatantly lies about it.
Lang was an idiot. You think people like him are smarter than you, because someone MADE him a detective. He's not Tony Stark. This dude's stories constantly made ZERO logical sense. When was the last time you ordered a pizza and 4 guys showed up to give you your ONE pizza????? Yet, Lang Vannater, Phillips and Furman ALL showed up to give a "Death Notification"...... And how was that conversation supposed to go down? LANG : "Mr. Simpson your ex-wife is dead" OJ SIMPSON : "Oh, God...Do you need me to identify the body?" LANG: "No, she's still laying over there dead - like road kill... We haven't even contacted the criminalists or coroner. After 15 minutes of investigating the crime scene. We thought we'd drop everything and come over and introduce ourselves"
I disagree with his defense of the blanket. They got it from Nicole's house. Could have easily introduced evidence and got rid of other evidence or disturbed it.
There was so much blood on Nicole, her neck, back, face. Remember she was almost decapitated. I still can't believe the photo. It makes me sad every time I look at it. She & Ron didn't deserve to die. I don't blame Fred Goldman for feeling the way he did & does today. 😢💔
Not true! What kind of evidence. Introduce Nicole to the murder scene? Thats laughable! Introduce what? Nothing, jst part of the sand storm stirred up against the police! He did his job & protected Nicole’s dead body. You guys are the worst, allowing the propaganda machine to lead you away from the simple Truth!
If you're going to surmise or critique and look into every case as if the people whose job it is to collect evidence are all there to plant evidence or remove evidence - for literally NO clear reason or motivation with the sole purpose of framing an innocent person and putting themselves in the position to be charged, then, why even bother? If we go into anything with the suspicion that whoever has a job as that person is untrustworthy or even homicidal, then why even have someone put tires on your car? After all, maybe the guy who rotated your tires is a sociopath and wants to kill you? It's a possibility, right? Or why ever eat at a restaurant because someone can be spitting in your food or even worse than that, right? With a mindset like that, why bother even believing anyone is EVER an honest person, just doing a job? Is anything possible? I guess, within reason, and I guess I could be struck by lightning today too. This case fascinated me, and I was in a job where the television was on in the adjacent bar from the restaurant I worked in so we had a chance to watch a lot of this live. It was in downtown Buffalo and the vast majority of our clientele was black, so there was a lot of debate going on, but if any case I've ever seen in my life had more than sufficient evidence to convict, this one did. Between Garcetti's inept prosecutors to Ito's loss of control in the courtroom, this was an injustice. At least the civil trial had the right verdict and oh by the way, I'm sure people reading this now, some twenty eight years later, are aware that two of the jurors have come out and publicly stated that they were going to vote for an acquittal regardless of the evidence based on their contempt for the LAPD and the Rodney King case. So, there's that. Water under the bridge though.
I like Tom, he's an experienced detective, he knows..We all know, he's guilty,. Everyone cheering like animals,disgusting, there is nothing to cheer and celebrate about, nothing! 2 people are dead, 2 kids grew up without their mother & a father with no son, Ron. Maybe there are a lot cheering right now as he meets his maker for the true judgement!
EXPERIENCED????!!!! Him and Vannatter didn't even contact the criminalists or coroner until hours later. IN FACT the criminalists were at OJ's before they even went to the murder scene and when they got there, the coroner was already moving the bodies. Your experienced investigator supposedly went to OJ's for the most moronic reason then proceeded to spend more time at OJ's than the murder scene. They spent 10-15 minutes investigating the murder scene - then ran to OJ's. Then spent a half hour "ALLEDLY" looking for ways to get ahold of OJ...because they didn't have OJ's phone number. NEVER ONCE thinking "Hey, let's ask OJ's daughter who's in the 4th grade for it".... EXPERIENCED???!!!! This jackass couldn't investigate a phone number out of a kid.
CarefuL, there's still some here on Earth that will always give OJ the benefit oF the doubt...many oF us are rather skeptical oF certain people ..I believe OJ did not do it.
I recall pictures of a sheet laying crumpled in the area where her body had been before being taken by the coroner. There were a lot of police standing around and on the sheet. Was that the sheet they put over her to protect her from prying eyes? Did they just pull it off and leave it laying crumpled on the ground?
The entire thing was a circus!! They had all of the evidence to condem him for life. The prosecution had a huge burden to prove to Ito that they had direct evidence linking him to this crisis. He was a jealous man, He didn't like the idea that Nicole was done with him & decided to move on with her life & be a single mother to their young children. He absolutely decided that if he couldn't have Nicole, no one was going to have her either. He was furious that Nicole ignored him at the recital. She had no desire to talk to him. I think the bag that was destroyed was critical to prove that he was the one who did this. The attorneys should have been gagged. The jury was sequestered for months!! The blood evidence was over whelming!. That would have been enough for me. He had no right to control Nicole & do this to her & Ron. He was at the wrong place at the wrong time- He tried to return Nicole's moms sunglasses. Nothing more. I understand Ito was upset that his wife was brought into the courtroom & tried to include her. For what reason?. Covid was not even around or knew about the disease until now, not in 1994!!! No idea why he mentioned this matter. Beyond me.
It wasn't about no one else having her.It had everything to do with OJ's need to be the winner in that war and in his self centered mind he was also saving 11,000$ of alimoni payments if she didn't exist anymore.He was such a delisional socio/psychopath on multiple levels and anyone who doesn't see that about him from a mile away is a f#ckin clueless low i.q idiot....
He had stalked her while she was with other men before. It’s on the 911 call (one of them). Paula broke up with him that morning. So his day started out bad and then got worse with Nicole and her family ignoring him but i think something set him off and what ever that was, sent over to her place. But, maybe unlike other times…instead of just fighting back…one theory is that she came out with a knife. OJs friend said in the ESPN Docuseries that OJ told him that, had she not come out with a knife, things would have been different. Couple that with some other theories and it may be more nuanced than he just went over there to straight up kill. But regardless, i believe he was there and assisted or just did it himself.
@@cashoutmedia1658 Well, I can read incident reports and testimony,so…. Common sense dictates that they had to have notes for themselves to file reports, and for testimony at trial. I’ve read many books and everyone of them talks about the detectives taking notes. Sorry that’s hard for you to understand.
Great interview! But how the hell did a channel with 693 subscribers, at the time I’m writing this, land an interview with the lead detective from the most famous criminal investigation maybe ever in US history? Maybe it’s just me or maybe Det. Lange grants interviews to anybody that asks, but it seems wild to me. Either way good interview I enjoyed listening to.
This was even called the oj show he said in an interview that men don't pay attention and he doesn't either to the type of shoes they wear in another he is said he only wears rebok and runners always pay attention to the shoes it's a tool to do work with
I always believed that O J did it and that, even without your book or additional evidence that was not presented, I know that the prosecution fucked it up. Bronco chase alone was left out and they didn’t stick to the simple truth that there was no one else that could have done this horrible crime. Glad that that monster is in hell.
That's non-sense. Marcia was angry that they let him go after the interrogation. Everyone from the police to the prosecution were either incompetent or criminals. This guy seems to forget alot of the bizarre actions took by him and Vannatter.
I like tom lange but he screwed up big time with the blanket and should just admit it. If they were so worried about the cameras they could have used the same bkanket to cover the entryway. And if a helicopter photographs the body, so be it.
I really honestly believe if there was a witness standing right there when Simpson committed these murders they would still of found him not guilty. O.J. committed these murders & got by with it. No justice for the victims. R I.P NICOLE BROWN & RON GOLDMAN YOU WILL ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED.
What Lange doesn't understand is that law enforcement must be held to the highest standards. All of the mistskes made by LAPD are magically said to be nothing of consequence according to Lange. I wonder if Lange would wash away a suspects mistakes as no big thing. Big contradiction this Lange is.And there were significant and suspicious mistakes and questions surrounding the LAPD. Lange is the perfect cop. Thats not exactly a compliment
No. He knew right away that this was a Sasquatch attack , n that the Discovery Channel was behind the frame up. LAPD just didn't have the authority over this. Discovery Channel was in charge , n had the upper hand. Lange simply was on the bottom of the totem pole , n took his orders. Vampires could have done this too. We don't know.
Simpson thought he was Samson and called the shoes mag lee as if he didn't know how to say it correctly don't forget about the teaching of knife fighting from the frogman tv show former navy seals
I must confess but I never knew that evidence is dismissed for a trial. I thought anything the cops find that can either help/prosecute a defendant is automatically used in court.
The interview was enough to convict Simpson. He contradicted himself over and over. The prosecution was stupid not to use it as evidence in the trial.
OJ contradicted himself????
All of the detectives REPEATEDLY got caught either lying or contradicting themselves or others.
Did you even watch the trial???? It's on UA-cam in its entirety. Countless hours of prosecution witnesses contradicting themselves, each other and logic.
For example, why didn't OJ use a gun? He owned one. And you can't say he was worried about being caught....
Because he supposedly left a bloody bronco parked out in the street.
You are 💯💯💯correct!!
It didn’t matter. The trial was a farce. They were always going to acquit him. They knew he did it. They didn’t care. The jury was racist.
By his own admission, he said he was wearing the Reeboks the night before. But, if you Google “OJ at dance recital” images, he’s wearing what appear to be black “Bruno Magli” shoes.
Ridiculous ...How would you be able to get close enough definitively identify Those particular brands of foreign shoes? .....im really sure that me personally would be able do that....plus, now days you'd have to Qualify as an expert. . does that make sense?
@@daviddavis3389
Key words were “ appear to be”. He isn’t wearing white Reeboks as he said was which is why Tom Lange took those particular shoes with him.
@@bigdaddycool4242 Ok, good comment/ & rebuttal.. thanks.
@@daviddavis3389saw them good enough to know they wasn't Reebok's
Tom Lange sounds like he was a great detective.
It's just a shame that murdering bastard wasn't convicted.
who told you he is a murderer, he was not convicted, and secondly did you ever think who else could have done that ? You beat your wife does NOT make you a murderer. Many people use to beat their wives and still do, but murder is a different level.
I think that he might have tell someone to do it….maybe, but remember that there was a women who lived with Nicole brown that was a heavy drug user, and the way they were killed, might point to a drug deal situation , the throat cutting is made by a pro, not a mad husband….
He did it. Blood evidence alone would convict anyone.
@@sega62sThe evidence OJ dripping blood from that cut knucle in his sixe 12 bruno malli shoes. Come on nobody is that stupid. The jury just let him go it's just that simple.
@@sega62s utter bollocks!!
@@slaphead8835 then why wasnt OJ convicted ???
A stark reminder that there is no guarantee of justice for anyone in the USA.
You talking about Ron or Nicole?... or the victims Mark Fuhrman laughed about assaulting in those tapes.
@@Jeromemayle
Ron and Nicole. They aren’t talking about an embellished tale for a movie/tv series.
not just in the usa, no-justice, light sentences, harsh sentences happen all over the world unfortunately. one thing is for sure- you hvae to be rich and non political to get guaranteed justice
Thank you so much for this!! I really REALLY LOVE Det. Lange! Seems like a smart det & a nice guy. 👍👍👍👍👍
Thanks! You are welcome to subscribe to the channel if you want.
We need more of Tom Lange
Seriously, Lange keeps rambling on &on, like he is a super pro( lol) if he was so intelligent, why didnt they catch OJ??
By the way, OJ outsmarted them.
@@daviddavis3389OJ didn't his scumbag lawyers did
@@daviddavis3389 How is Lange's intelligence related to catching OJ when it was the jury who rendered the verdict not him?
@@Romulan2469 without the brilliance & the LAPD, ( especially Lange Vannatter this case would have not been solved..without the effort of these officer, + Lange where would we be?
Lange and Vannater had gotten lazy over the course of time and started cutting corners. It came back on them.
What carners did they cut?
@@socialoutkast5657 Many. A good example is covering Nicole's body with that blanket therefore contaminating the crime scene purely for the purpose of stopping the media taking photographs and videos. Or how about Lange carrying the Reebok shoes without gloves under his arm and taking them home with him. Vannatter bringing OJ's blood to Rockingham to book it in with the criminalist instead of taking it to the lab. Wearing no protective covering on their shoes before trampling all over that crime scene. I could go on all day but you get the point!
A hospital blanket? I’m pretty sure Lange testified the blanket was from inside Nicole’s condo. Which I’ve seen & that being said, OJ did it.
He screwed up big time with that blanket taken from Nicole's condo to cover her body. That blood drop evidence on her back was crucial to identifying the killer and it was all lost due to poor crime scene investigation techniques which the defense used to their advantage to set him free.
Good for Tom Lange still speaking out about what happened that night. He’s heard a lot said about his partner Phil Vanatter in the years since he passed, and always came forward to speak up for him
He and Phil Vannatter were like the 3 stooges OR key stone cops!! OJ was really, really smart.
@@daviddavis3389 really smart? Left his blood all over the crime scene, in his car and in clothing on his socks in his home. Cant remember where he got cut less than 24 hours before then blatantly lies about it.
Ito had decided about the cameras being in the courtroom so there wouldn't be any speculation. Every one wanted to know every step of the way.
Interesting. Comprehensive. Thank you.
The bronco chase and his conversation with Det. Lange during the chase was a slam dunk.
The racist jurors set him free.
great interview
Thanks, you are welcome to subscribe to the channel if you want.
Lange knows this case like the back of his hand.
Excellent interview.
You're welcome to subscribe to the channel if you like it.
sad the detectives got blamed for this. truth is Lange was an excellent detective.
Thanks for your appreciation Mark, you are welcome to subscribe to the channel if you like videos like this.
@@leonardosalvaggio already did!
Lang was an idiot. You think people like him are smarter than you, because someone MADE him a detective. He's not Tony Stark. This dude's stories constantly made ZERO logical sense. When was the last time you ordered a pizza and 4 guys showed up to give you your ONE pizza?????
Yet, Lang Vannater, Phillips and Furman ALL showed up to give a "Death Notification"......
And how was that conversation supposed to go down?
LANG : "Mr. Simpson your ex-wife is dead"
OJ SIMPSON : "Oh, God...Do you need me to identify the body?"
LANG: "No, she's still laying over there dead - like road kill... We haven't even contacted the criminalists or coroner. After 15 minutes of investigating the crime scene. We thought we'd drop everything and come over and introduce ourselves"
Yes he was!! EXCELLENT!!
@@Jeromemayle 😳🙄
I disagree with his defense of the blanket. They got it from Nicole's house. Could have easily introduced evidence and got rid of other evidence or disturbed it.
Yes there were blood splatters on her back and legs that were not tested
There was so much blood on Nicole, her neck, back, face. Remember she was almost decapitated. I still can't believe the photo. It makes me sad every time I look at it. She & Ron didn't deserve to die. I don't blame Fred Goldman for feeling the way he did & does today. 😢💔
Not true! What kind of evidence. Introduce Nicole to the murder scene? Thats laughable! Introduce what? Nothing, jst part of the sand storm stirred up against the police! He did his job & protected Nicole’s dead body. You guys are the worst, allowing the propaganda machine to lead you away from the simple Truth!
If you're going to surmise or critique and look into every case as if the people whose job it is to collect evidence are all there to plant evidence or remove evidence - for literally NO clear reason or motivation with the sole purpose of framing an innocent person and putting themselves in the position to be charged, then, why even bother? If we go into anything with the suspicion that whoever has a job as that person is untrustworthy or even homicidal, then why even have someone put tires on your car? After all, maybe the guy who rotated your tires is a sociopath and wants to kill you? It's a possibility, right? Or why ever eat at a restaurant because someone can be spitting in your food or even worse than that, right? With a mindset like that, why bother even believing anyone is EVER an honest person, just doing a job? Is anything possible? I guess, within reason, and I guess I could be struck by lightning today too. This case fascinated me, and I was in a job where the television was on in the adjacent bar from the restaurant I worked in so we had a chance to watch a lot of this live. It was in downtown Buffalo and the vast majority of our clientele was black, so there was a lot of debate going on, but if any case I've ever seen in my life had more than sufficient evidence to convict, this one did. Between Garcetti's inept prosecutors to Ito's loss of control in the courtroom, this was an injustice. At least the civil trial had the right verdict and oh by the way, I'm sure people reading this now, some twenty eight years later, are aware that two of the jurors have come out and publicly stated that they were going to vote for an acquittal regardless of the evidence based on their contempt for the LAPD and the Rodney King case. So, there's that. Water under the bridge though.
I like Tom, he's an experienced detective, he knows..We all know, he's guilty,.
Everyone cheering like animals,disgusting, there is nothing to cheer and celebrate about, nothing!
2 people are dead, 2 kids grew up without their mother & a father with no son, Ron.
Maybe there are a lot cheering right now as he meets his maker for the true judgement!
Gill, you are welcome to subscribe the channel if you like my work.
@@leonardosalvaggio Have done thanks. 👍😊
Thank you!
EXPERIENCED????!!!! Him and Vannatter didn't even contact the criminalists or coroner until hours later. IN FACT the criminalists were at OJ's before they even went to the murder scene and when they got there, the coroner was already moving the bodies. Your experienced investigator supposedly went to OJ's for the most moronic reason then proceeded to spend more time at OJ's than the murder scene. They spent 10-15 minutes investigating the murder scene - then ran to OJ's. Then spent a half hour "ALLEDLY" looking for ways to get ahold of OJ...because they didn't have OJ's phone number. NEVER ONCE thinking "Hey, let's ask OJ's daughter who's in the 4th grade for it".... EXPERIENCED???!!!! This jackass couldn't investigate a phone number out of a kid.
CarefuL, there's still some here on Earth that will always give OJ the benefit oF the doubt...many oF us are rather skeptical oF certain people ..I believe OJ did not do it.
Marcia Clarke was seen partying at the House of Blues during the trial. She got off on being on tv. That’s it.
She was also seen comfortably chatting and laughing with Cochran during the trial.
Office visit too, maybe?
Do you have more of this video Leonardo?
If you mean about OJ, no. If you mean other cases, yes, there's a lot of other videos on the channel.
Edward, you are of course welcome to subscribe to the channel
All of a sudden it was a clean hospital blanket.
EXACTLY!!!!
I recall pictures of a sheet laying crumpled in the area where her body had been before being taken by the coroner. There were a lot of police standing around and on the sheet. Was that the sheet they put over her to protect her from prying eyes? Did they just pull it off and leave it laying crumpled on the ground?
This interview is outstanding!
You are welcome to subscribe to the channel if you like my videos. Thank you!
I agree, thank you for your channel and your work.. I'm sub 362!!
Thank you and welcome!
The entire thing was a circus!! They had all of the evidence to condem him for life. The prosecution had a huge burden to prove to Ito that they had direct evidence linking him to this crisis. He was a jealous man, He didn't like the idea that Nicole was done with him & decided to move on with her life & be a single mother to their young children. He absolutely decided that if he couldn't have Nicole, no one was going to have her either. He was furious that Nicole ignored him at the recital. She had no desire to talk to him. I think the bag that was destroyed was critical to prove that he was the one who did this. The attorneys should have been gagged. The jury was sequestered for months!! The blood evidence was over whelming!. That would have been enough for me. He had no right to control Nicole & do this to her & Ron. He was at the wrong place at the wrong time- He tried to return Nicole's moms sunglasses. Nothing more. I understand Ito was upset that his wife was brought into the courtroom & tried to include her. For what reason?. Covid was not even around or knew about the disease until now, not in 1994!!! No idea why he mentioned this matter. Beyond me.
It wasn't about no one else having her.It had everything to do with OJ's need to be the winner in that war and in his self centered mind he was also saving 11,000$ of alimoni payments if she didn't exist anymore.He was such a delisional socio/psychopath on multiple levels and anyone who doesn't see that about him from a mile away is a f#ckin clueless low i.q idiot....
He had stalked her while she was with other men before. It’s on the 911 call (one of them). Paula broke up with him that morning. So his day started out bad and then got worse with Nicole and her family ignoring him but i think something set him off and what ever that was, sent over to her place. But, maybe unlike other times…instead of just fighting back…one theory is that she came out with a knife. OJs friend said in the ESPN Docuseries that OJ told him that, had she not come out with a knife, things would have been different. Couple that with some other theories and it may be more nuanced than he just went over there to straight up kill. But regardless, i believe he was there and assisted or just did it himself.
THE COPS TOOK ZERO NOTES AT THE CRIME SCENE? WHO DOES THAT??
Lol! They took notes. Fuhrman took notes. They have pictures of those notes. Lange took notes when he took over the crime scene.
@@bigdaddycool4242Google CHARLIE EHRLICH MIAMI NEW TIMES..
@@cashoutmedia1658
They took notes,lol!
@@bigdaddycool4242 You re missing the real story.....
@@cashoutmedia1658
Well, I can read incident reports and testimony,so….
Common sense dictates that they had to have notes for themselves to file reports, and for testimony at trial. I’ve read many books and everyone of them talks about the detectives taking notes.
Sorry that’s hard for you to understand.
How the hell did u get this guy
I have good connections 😀. You are welcome to subscribe to the channel if you want.
How did you injure your hand.? 10 days before a friend suspected he had keys. Mary j in system.
Great interview! But how the hell did a channel with 693 subscribers, at the time I’m writing this, land an interview with the lead detective from the most famous criminal investigation maybe ever in US history? Maybe it’s just me or maybe Det. Lange grants interviews to anybody that asks, but it seems wild to me. Either way good interview I enjoyed listening to.
Not like that. I had good connections, sorry but can't tell you more 😁. Well, you can help gain more subscribers by subscribing yourself.
@@leonardosalvaggio awesome man! Heck of an interview I really enjoyed listening!
@@theoutdoorsman9726 thank you! You might like all the others on the channel, check them out!
@@leonardosalvaggio absolutely
@@theoutdoorsman9726 and you are of course welcome to subscribe if you want to ;-)
Opinion? Right the jurors opinion
This was even called the oj show he said in an interview that men don't pay attention and he doesn't either to the type of shoes they wear in another he is said he only wears rebok and runners always pay attention to the shoes it's a tool to do work with
Never said hedropped a glass.
8. There were 12 or 13 inconsistancy.
Darden DID NOT DO A GOOD JOB! He didn’t want to convict Simpson.
Yeah, ok buddy.
He did too!! He wept for Nicole’s & Ron’s family.
He wanted to convict him, but, he was an idiot.
I thought he did a good job. Obviously the glove fiasco was a major blunder.
I always believed that O J did it and that, even without your book or additional evidence that was not presented, I know that the prosecution fucked it up. Bronco chase alone was left out and they didn’t stick to the simple truth that there was no one else that could have done this horrible crime. Glad that that monster is in hell.
They left out 1 key factor....
The Race Card.
What is a Race Card, and who invented it?
@@daviddavis3389 13% of the population. That's who.
25 couldn't get glockenspiel on
32 we printed that bulb
We were forced to interview hi
Inter view about evidence lastbkood
12 everything pointed
The Los Angeles DA office didn’t want to convict Simpson. Darden said in his opening statement the prosecutors didn’t want to do anything to him.
That's non-sense. Marcia was angry that they let him go after the interrogation. Everyone from the police to the prosecution were either incompetent or criminals. This guy seems to forget alot of the bizarre actions took by him and Vannatter.
@@Jeromemayle This guy forgets NOTHING!!!
The trial became the O.J. Simpson Show.
I like tom lange but he screwed up big time with the blanket and should just admit it.
If they were so worried about the cameras they could have used the same bkanket to cover the entryway.
And if a helicopter photographs the body, so be it.
9. Obviously not the shoes from the crime scene. Later told Cochran tested for blood.
38 so we give this guy a poly and he passes with flying colors.
31:33 vandalism bulb.
Like the jihn ramce case ??
I really honestly believe if there was a witness standing right there when Simpson committed these murders they would still of found him not guilty. O.J. committed these murders & got by with it. No justice for the victims. R I.P NICOLE BROWN & RON GOLDMAN YOU WILL ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED.
9 checked closet surrendered shoes. But what about Fer spots for blood
8 in charge of onterview
10 he told Jonny he had Ed spots tested 4 blood. Not given to fung.
30 in his pokets
Not an interrogatio.
Lange quit trying to make excuses for the terrible job the police did
He didn't put anything in garbage cans at airport. They had Camaras lier.
This happened long before there were cameras everywhere- even in airports.
20 26 he was in and out of the investigation on day one. Not.
We have no evidence at the r
Time t confront
28 dropped? ? DROPPE
21 under the influence Mary J tested
What Lange doesn't understand is that law enforcement must be held to the highest standards. All of the mistskes made by LAPD are magically said to be nothing of consequence according to Lange. I wonder if Lange would wash away a suspects mistakes as no big thing. Big contradiction this Lange is.And there were significant and suspicious mistakes and questions surrounding the LAPD. Lange is the perfect cop. Thats not exactly a compliment
32 break
Did Tom Lange think it was premeditated murder or rage gone wrong
No. He knew right away that this was a Sasquatch attack , n that the Discovery Channel was behind the frame up. LAPD just didn't have the authority over this. Discovery Channel was in charge , n had the upper hand. Lange simply was on the bottom of the totem pole , n took his orders. Vampires could have done this too. We don't know.
Obviously whoever murdered Ron and Nicole came to her home prepared to murder her because they had a knife, gloves and a knit cap.
@@gnas3390 do you think it was OJ,
You are welcome to subscribe to the channel if you like my videos GNA S
You are welcome too to subscribe to the channel if you like it
Simpson thought he was Samson and called the shoes mag lee as if he didn't know how to say it correctly don't forget about the teaching of knife fighting from the frogman tv show former navy seals
24 bend
Tom Lange is a Class Act!! He is so honest and a good guy!! Love him!
Lynette, you are welcome to subscribe to the channel if you want.
Tom Lange probably hasn't nothing going on in retirement...gd interview though
@@ryanstevenson1364 you are welcome to subscribe if you like the channel
@@leonardosalvaggio O.J will always have the single best rushing season of all time..that's more important than killing two people
@@ryanstevenson1364
I believe Eric Dickerson has the single best rushing season with 2,105 yards to Simpsons 2,003.
19 lange and van gagged?
31 simpson did steal the keys to her condim. 10 days before n told one of her f.
40 on wit stand 4 8 days
Lange the second biggest screw up next to mark.
21 Marijuana in blood
What's with you & all the comments?
26 06 in out day won
I must confess but I never knew that evidence is dismissed for a trial. I thought anything the cops find that can either help/prosecute a defendant is automatically used in court.
Not guilty.. the man is innocent.,
Tom lang is a clown !!!
4 you stop brs at at
The Killer put the glove there not the Cops
RIP O.J. the great..
Tom Lange is a crooked cop who needs to be in prison.