It's a common theme with startups to shamelessly oversell their projects. How can you come up with amazing efficiency numbers? You compare a fully loaded Celera airplane on trip that suits it and divide fuel consumption by number of passengers. Compare this with the thirstiest SUV on the market that only transports the driver on a mountainous route with lots of bends, then add some stop-and-go. There's nothing revolutionary about the Celera's design so I'm sceptical about the claims until production models can actually be tested.
Is it just me who thinks this is a scam? No way it has performance this good. Think about it the Piaggio Avanti which is very aerodynamic and has a pusher propeller configuration doesn't get this kind of performance, and they are at it for 40 years, wouldn't you imagine they would have at least made drastic improvement's if that was possible by now? Or the predator drone which would have great benefits if it could have this range, get's only about the same s most other pusher propeller air planes! The only way this can get that kind of performance and range is if it's a pretty much an empty shell with lots of fuel flying in very good conditions !
I don't buy it either. BS is nothing but chewed up grass. It might be more fuel efficient than similar aircraft of the same size. But it is likely to be 5 or 10 percent better, not 2, 3 or 5 times more efficient. We live in a world today where lying is more common than the truth.
Après tous ce beau travail de passionnés cet Aircraft aura une très belle place dans un musée de l Aéronautique ! Bravo! Merci Thank you merci a vous tous
Thats because nature evolved the tuna to move very quickly through water an even more difficult medium than air... but maintaining laminar flow . Learn from the longest running test program 😉😎🧙♂️
The engine of this aircraft is not the most powerful aircraft piston engine currently available. The Polish company WSK-PZL Kalisz offers the latest version of the Shvetsov ASh-62 (whose basic design is about 90 years old) which produces 1000 horsepower.
And this aircraft look like same shape of piagio p180 this is a real plane not a this joke celera 500 Don’t sale any plane and make advertising of celera 750 or 800
Just think if you had a two passenger version and still used the same engine or smaller engine that was a turbo charged kubota diesel engine or a three stage turbine that mixes exhaust to heat air coming into the engine to warm up air before going into the combustion chamber.
5000 hr commercial pilot here. There is a number of inacuracies in this video. Diesel fuel is not certified for use in aircraft. Jet fuel is the only fuel for this aircraft.
@@morrow100 just take my word for it, as I am a professional in aviation. Yes, the engine will will operate quite happily on biodiesel, canola oil, peanut oil or what ever. But ONLY jet fuel is allowed to be used in certified aircraft as per the regulations of CASA, FAA, EASA etc. Some operators (Airwork category only such as s ag spraying) have an instrument of approval from the regulator to use diesel.
@@Ozgrade3 Check the TC sheet, you're wrong. CMEL/ IR as well here. Ever heard of Centurion, SMA, Austro Engines etc.? Yes, all certified, all legal, pls stick to what you know.
@@Walterwaltraud Well considering I write Operations Manuals for Commercial operations (Part 135), at least in Australia there are no approvals for diesel or biodiesel. There are some approvals for their use in airwork such as ag spraying. PVT ops are a different ball game.
It's all about the laminar flow, layers of air gliding over each other to dramatically reduce drag. I wonder how susceptible to weather that effect is.
Seeing the broad enthusiasm, acceptance and total lack of cynicism over this "just around the corner - new technology", I'm reminded that frequently those who know the least think they know the most... Not any of this technology is truly earth-shattering or even new. It seems the principles of thermodynamics somehow work differently within this engine. And don't think a secreted addendum to Bernoulli's principles were found in his basement. I'm not saying it cannot work out, just that I don't think it will, as I've been a player in the realm of innovative development in a past life.
More egg than the piaggio
The numbers regarding multiple times efficiency can not be correct.
It's a common theme with startups to shamelessly oversell their projects.
How can you come up with amazing efficiency numbers? You compare a fully loaded Celera airplane on trip that suits it and divide fuel consumption by number of passengers. Compare this with the thirstiest SUV on the market that only transports the driver on a mountainous route with lots of bends, then add some stop-and-go.
There's nothing revolutionary about the Celera's design so I'm sceptical about the claims until production models can actually be tested.
Is it just me who thinks this is a scam? No way it has performance this good. Think about it the Piaggio Avanti which is very aerodynamic and has a pusher propeller configuration doesn't get this kind of performance, and they are at it for 40 years, wouldn't you imagine they would have at least made drastic improvement's if that was possible by now? Or the predator drone which would have great benefits if it could have this range, get's only about the same s most other pusher propeller air planes! The only way this can get that kind of performance and range is if it's a pretty much an empty shell with lots of fuel flying in very good conditions !
Agreed, that plane will not fly 400+ mph for that amount of HP.
I don't buy it either. BS is nothing but chewed up grass. It might be more fuel efficient than similar aircraft of the same size. But it is likely to be 5 or 10 percent better, not 2, 3 or 5 times more efficient. We live in a world today where lying is more common than the truth.
Crossing the Atlantic on a single engine aircraft would make me nervous.
this must be designed for crossing America (NY to LAL), not the Ocean!
The plural of "aircraft" is aircraft. No S. Learn english please.
Thanks professor! Shouldn't E be capital in English?
Have more than 3 year and nothing No real test no press image only the same old image in all videos
Look like a scam try take a money of investor
Après tous ce beau travail de passionnés cet Aircraft aura une très belle place dans un musée de l Aéronautique ! Bravo!
Merci Thank you merci a vous tous
Nice window view...
where is it? it made a huge buzz for a few years. did the oil companies bury it?
No, the russian who "made" the engine in Germany is a fraud.
It looks like a Tuna
Thats because nature evolved the tuna to move very quickly through water an even more difficult medium than air... but maintaining laminar flow .
Learn from the longest running test program 😉😎🧙♂️
More like an orca!
@@mishkabaloo1447
Nature evolved to exploit laminar flow...just in water.
The engine of this aircraft is not the most powerful aircraft piston engine currently available. The Polish company WSK-PZL Kalisz offers the latest version of the Shvetsov ASh-62 (whose basic design is about 90 years old) which produces 1000 horsepower.
Looks to me like runway visibility while landing might be a little limited.
We have good cameras now.
No kidding.. That was my first impression too..
And this aircraft look like same shape of piagio p180 this is a real plane
not a this joke celera 500
Don’t sale any plane and make advertising of celera 750 or 800
The plural of aircraft is aircraft, not aircrafts!
Just think if you had a two passenger version and still used the same engine or smaller engine that was a turbo charged kubota diesel engine or a three stage turbine that mixes exhaust to heat air coming into the engine to warm up air before going into the combustion chamber.
5000 hr commercial pilot here. There is a number of inacuracies in this video. Diesel fuel is not certified for use in aircraft. Jet fuel is the only fuel for this aircraft.
This aircraft uses a RED A03 diesel piston V12 engine. It can run on both jet fuel & biodiesel.
@@morrow100 just take my word for it, as I am a professional in aviation. Yes, the engine will will operate quite happily on biodiesel, canola oil, peanut oil or what ever. But ONLY jet fuel is allowed to be used in certified aircraft as per the regulations of CASA, FAA, EASA etc. Some operators (Airwork category only such as s ag spraying) have an instrument of approval from the regulator to use diesel.
@@Ozgrade3 Check the TC sheet, you're wrong. CMEL/ IR as well here. Ever heard of Centurion, SMA, Austro Engines etc.? Yes, all certified, all legal, pls stick to what you know.
@@Walterwaltraud Well considering I write Operations Manuals for Commercial operations (Part 135), at least in Australia there are no approvals for diesel or biodiesel. There are some approvals for their use in airwork such as ag spraying. PVT ops are a different ball game.
Derv aero engines were extensively used in aviation historically and provide the power for the Airlander Airships.
The cirrus vision jet is $2 to $4 million and is a seven passenger airplane
Please stop with the A.I. voice. It is not fun listening to them...
with toroidal prop it will be twice efficient even
It's all about the laminar flow, layers of air gliding over each other to dramatically reduce drag. I wonder how susceptible to weather that effect is.
Over promise.
Under deliver.
A one off unproven prototype. Will it ever get to production. The odds are not good.
Seeing the broad enthusiasm, acceptance and total lack of cynicism over this "just around the corner - new technology",
I'm reminded that frequently those who know the least think they know the most... Not any of this technology is truly earth-shattering or even new.
It seems the principles of thermodynamics somehow work differently within this engine. And don't think a secreted addendum to Bernoulli's principles were found in his basement.
I'm not saying it cannot work out, just that I don't think it will, as I've been a player in the realm of innovative development in a past life.
Would love to see the MPG when they try it with a tororoidal propeller!
What about headwinds and tailwinds. Ever think about that?
Aircraft fuel efficiency is not ascertained by distance per gallon.
I call this thing the Death Pod or Air Coffin
I don’t own an SUV…
Jet fuel is diesel.
It is kerosene
His speed is fake
Could it be more efficient if using jet turbin engine?