🔥Gimp or Photoshop, which is your pick? Would you help this video reach 5K likes? You're awesome! ➝ Get Photoshop (35% off): thecyberlab.co/Photoshop Best Design Software: ua-cam.com/video/gFXywvFNfyA/v-deo.html
This is just an Adobe ad, which you at least made pretty clear with a sponsorship from them. Clearly you're being paid to make it look better than it is. There's not even an attempt to appear unbiased. Nobody thinks the subscription model is a "good deal" or "affordable" except for large corporations making tons of money off of it.
Ok, I STOPPED the video when I saw that you gave GIMP the same price score as $20 PER MONTH Photoshop. PER MONTH. I'm leaving after posting this and won't come back. I regret coming to here.
GIMP is Free but still only get's a 4/5. IT should be a 5/5 on price. But then at the end you find out why they gave it a lower score than Photoshop. The video creators are getting a kick back from Adobe. Just check out the link in the description. Never trust someone who is being paid to tell you something.
If a paid software had a lifespan of 3 years then that is $720 for 3 years. How do $720 and $0 get the same rating? * Even just a 2 year lifespan is $480. And payments never end. Never. End. (Until you die, I guess.) And that's before expanded Adobe cloud storage costs are added on. (Which also never end. Every month. Until you die.) Until GIMP gets proper adjustment layers the program Krita does. And GIMP may in version 3.2. CMYK as well. To me, the lack of adjustment layers is the biggest current drawback to GIMP. Personally, I love Photoshop. But Adobe is the Borg. And GIMP + Krita can do very well. And darktable for the raw stage. And ... careful preparation when creating the photograph in the first place instead of relying so heavily on magical AI post-production from the Borg. Which you will be paying for every month of your life. Until you get forgetful enough in your old age to not know how to update your credit card number for Adobe. Or until... you die. (To be more fair, the 3-year comparison for me would be $720 vs. $250+ , as I do send $25-$30 per year to open sources that I am actively using).
Not a hater, but I don't know how Ps got the exact same points in price that Gimp got. Of course I understand that you get cool features, updates, AI, etc. But I'm pretty sure that free forever will always be better than $20 a month The rest of the video is pretty much accurate
I find it truely hilarious that you gave a notoriously expensive software and a free software the exact same score for “price” How could this possibly of gotten past the editing desk, what a glaring mistake
Biased review. He even created biases introducing the programs raining champion vs crappy underdog . From here he wants to created a mood in favor of one vs another. Well earned dislike for creating and introducing biases
As a former photoshop user and current GIMP user I have to say that not having adjustment layers is not a big deal or deal breaker at all to me because I didn't even know about them until 2019. Honestly as an old school photoshop user I found them clunky and confusing. GIMP indicates what layer you are on which photoshop does not do by default, that feature alone make non-destructive editing really nice. The entire way GIMP's layer system works is better than photoshop because you can not click and drag to move layers which I think we all have done in photoshop to our detriment. Its got a much nicer GUI imo too because in the layers area you can do 8 things with your mouse in space of about 2 inches.
gimp gets a 4 out of 5 rating for price??? It's FREE. You don't even need to give an email address. This video is obviously biased. The free option gets 4/5 and the paid subscription option gets 4/5??? What exactly would a free alternative need in order to get a 5/5 for price? To me it's obvious that the people making the video did this to avoid gimp having a final average rating too close to PhotoShop.
i clicked out the moment i saw the adobe creative cloud sponsorship, i haven't watched it, but i know he is going to show adobe as the better option 🤣,
Completely agree with the rest. You can't give them both the same score on price. Especially when you're sponsored by one of them. Also oh yeah use my code and get 40% off but for how long and when Adobe decides to jack up the price then what. Oh it's still a 4/5 for price isn't it! Don't ruin your reputation by shilling out for these companies that only care about the bottom line.
As somebody who doesn't have a ball in this game? The fact that you took a sponsorship for Adobe in this video? Really does make it seem more like an advertisement than an actual comparison and thus isn't going to be a fair comparison.
Open-source certainly doesn't mean that no one gets paid to do it, that's quite a gross simplification to make there. GIMP precisely may not be of those, but many open-source projects have hired teams and open-source software can even be made by commercial companies, maybe you've heard of small startups like Microsoft or Google which happen to be the most productive open-source contributors...
Rah! Rah! Rah! Sis! Boom! Bah! This comparison had all the legitimacy of a cheerleading squad cheering the home team, in this case Photoshop. Giving Photoshop such a high rating on price showed a willful ignorance about true costs. Sure $20 a month seems reasonable but multiply that times 12 and it doesn't seem quite as affordable. And don't forget that this monthly expense is FOREVER and that Adobe at any time can raise it. Another thing mention in this video was that GIMP doesn't have non-destructive editing without making any effort to see if that was in the works for a future version. (It's going to be part of the next major release.) It also said that community developed software has slow release cycles which isn't necessarily true. Just take a look at how quickly the 3D software Blender has developed. It is rapidly catching up to its commercial competitors and is surpassing many of them. If GIMP had a foundation structured like the Blender Foundation it might be developing as quickly. CMYK support might be a big issue if you are in print but most doing photo editing aren't. Many of the whiz-bang features that Adobe keeps stuffing into Photoshop aren't things useful enough to justify the increased cost. Another thing this video completely ignored was that there might be any other software that could be competitive other than GIMP, free or otherwise. There is. For instance for a one time purchase of $50 you can buy Affinity Photo which does most of the key things that people use Photoshop for, including having non-destructive editing built into it. Sure it might not have AI but isn't Adobe facilitating the demise of their own customers with their uncritical embrace of it? I never got comfortable enough with the interface of GIMP to want to make it my photo editing app of choice and Adobe's constant desire to dip into your pocket has given me second thoughts about Photoshop, as well as the rest of their offerings. They've already made their money long ago and don't need mine.
@@MohamedEssam-gx9vhKrita is focused on digital illustration, so I don't know how good it is for photo editing. Beside that, Krita runs on pretty much every system: Linux, Windows, MacOS, iPad OS, Chrome OS, and Android (beta).
I like Krita for its digital drawing and painting capabilities and for those reasons I think it is a great replacement for Photoshop. It might need some work to make it more crash proof but I'm sure that will come with time. For doing that I see absolutely no reason to pay for Photoshop. I haven't really tried it for photo editing, since it doesn't really seem to be designed for that, but I'm sure for a lot of people it would work fine for that. (I use Affinity Photo for my photo editing needs.)
🔥Gimp or Photoshop, which is your pick? Would you help this video reach 5K likes? You're awesome!
➝ Get Photoshop (35% off): thecyberlab.co/Photoshop
Best Design Software: ua-cam.com/video/gFXywvFNfyA/v-deo.html
I say NO to Adobe and NO to the rest of corporate America!
Four out of five on price? How do you improve on FREE? Should Gimp pay us to download the software?
True!! I don’t know either where this rate come from!
They're getting a kick back from Adobe with the Link in the description. That's why they couldn't get GIMP a higher score.
I was thinking the same thing.
bro wanted to be paid for using the software
LoL
4/5 for the price value of a free software ? Wat ?
absurd
5/5 its maybe when they give you money for downloading their app
And its even open source, so you even can fork and make your custom version of gimp lol
This is just an Adobe ad, which you at least made pretty clear with a sponsorship from them. Clearly you're being paid to make it look better than it is. There's not even an attempt to appear unbiased. Nobody thinks the subscription model is a "good deal" or "affordable" except for large corporations making tons of money off of it.
Agree
💯
Okay you convinced me
I'm using GIMP
Ok, I STOPPED the video when I saw that you gave GIMP the same price score as $20 PER MONTH Photoshop. PER MONTH. I'm leaving after posting this and won't come back. I regret coming to here.
You got far, I stopped the moment I saw that this is sponsored by adobe
seriously your sponsor is adobe... yea this is not a biased video.
GIMP is Free but still only get's a 4/5. IT should be a 5/5 on price. But then at the end you find out why they gave it a lower score than Photoshop. The video creators are getting a kick back from Adobe. Just check out the link in the description. Never trust someone who is being paid to tell you something.
If a paid software had a lifespan of 3 years then that is $720 for 3 years. How do $720 and $0 get the same rating? *
Even just a 2 year lifespan is $480.
And payments never end. Never. End. (Until you die, I guess.)
And that's before expanded Adobe cloud storage costs are added on. (Which also never end. Every month. Until you die.)
Until GIMP gets proper adjustment layers the program Krita does. And GIMP may in version 3.2. CMYK as well. To me, the lack of adjustment layers is the biggest current drawback to GIMP.
Personally, I love Photoshop. But Adobe is the Borg. And GIMP + Krita can do very well. And darktable for the raw stage. And ... careful preparation when creating the photograph in the first place instead of relying so heavily on magical AI post-production from the Borg. Which you will be paying for every month of your life. Until you get forgetful enough in your old age to not know how to update your credit card number for Adobe. Or until... you die.
(To be more fair, the 3-year comparison for me would be $720 vs. $250+ , as I do send $25-$30 per year to open sources that I am actively using).
Why GIMP + Krita? Why do you need both and not just Krita? (I'm not familiar with Krita but installed Darktable after reading your comment, thanks!)
ps: do you know a good alternative to substance designer and substance painter?
Thanks Adobe! Can't wait to use the FREE GIMP.
Not a hater, but I don't know how Ps got the exact same points in price that Gimp got. Of course I understand that you get cool features, updates, AI, etc. But I'm pretty sure that free forever will always be better than $20 a month
The rest of the video is pretty much accurate
AI* and yes we don't need some crazy tool that will eat your gpu
I find it truely hilarious that you gave a notoriously expensive software and a free software the exact same score for “price”
How could this possibly of gotten past the editing desk, what a glaring mistake
it's not a mistake it's adobe's type of marketing. probably will get sued by the EU at some point, I hope.
I give you O.1/5.5 for your for your gimp gimp price rating 😂😂
Biased review. He even created biases introducing the programs raining champion vs crappy underdog . From here he wants to created a mood in favor of one vs another. Well earned dislike for creating and introducing biases
Yes. And had a promo code. I stopped watching at 1:17.
Did you just compare 2 software while being paid by one of them..... Yeah.... Sorry but skipping this
As a former photoshop user and current GIMP user I have to say that not having adjustment layers is not a big deal or deal breaker at all to me because I didn't even know about them until 2019. Honestly as an old school photoshop user I found them clunky and confusing. GIMP indicates what layer you are on which photoshop does not do by default, that feature alone make non-destructive editing really nice. The entire way GIMP's layer system works is better than photoshop because you can not click and drag to move layers which I think we all have done in photoshop to our detriment. Its got a much nicer GUI imo too because in the layers area you can do 8 things with your mouse in space of about 2 inches.
Use a Captain Jack Sparrow Version that requires less system resources. The black Ps guru from UA-cam Piximperfect invented this term. Lol.
Ps against GIMP in a video supported by Ps itself! No Bias whatsoever, right...?
gimp gets a 4 out of 5 rating for price??? It's FREE. You don't even need to give an email address. This video is obviously biased. The free option gets 4/5 and the paid subscription option gets 4/5??? What exactly would a free alternative need in order to get a 5/5 for price? To me it's obvious that the people making the video did this to avoid gimp having a final average rating too close to PhotoShop.
i clicked out the moment i saw the adobe creative cloud sponsorship, i haven't watched it, but i know he is going to show adobe as the better option 🤣,
For me, Gimp does all essential tasks. I create all works in Gimp.
I don't recomend watching this video.
Thanks to the comments i did not watch the video and wasted my 13min to watch adobe ad
A free software vs a very expensive one which is also the sponsor of the video…
I do want to stay lightweight and more importantly, more specialized in image manupilation only... no need for extra features!
Bro you were sponsored by adobe
you lost me at 40% discount in photoshop.
seriously your sponsor is adobe...Bad video
photoshop is crap and overpriced.
there's 225 dislike and 133 like
i rate this video a 0 out of 100
Completely agree with the rest. You can't give them both the same score on price. Especially when you're sponsored by one of them. Also oh yeah use my code and get 40% off but for how long and when Adobe decides to jack up the price then what. Oh it's still a 4/5 for price isn't it! Don't ruin your reputation by shilling out for these companies that only care about the bottom line.
OK, I stopped the video at 4/5 price for Gimp. My question would be: Does it run on my system? Photoshop won't, end of comparison.
BIASED. Stupid paid ad
As somebody who doesn't have a ball in this game? The fact that you took a sponsorship for Adobe in this video? Really does make it seem more like an advertisement than an actual comparison and thus isn't going to be a fair comparison.
Open-source certainly doesn't mean that no one gets paid to do it, that's quite a gross simplification to make there.
GIMP precisely may not be of those, but many open-source projects have hired teams and open-source software can even be made by commercial companies, maybe you've heard of small startups like Microsoft or Google which happen to be the most productive open-source contributors...
4/5 for gimp's free price? what, do you want the developers to pay you to use gimp??
Rah! Rah! Rah! Sis! Boom! Bah! This comparison had all the legitimacy of a cheerleading squad cheering the home team, in this case Photoshop. Giving Photoshop such a high rating on price showed a willful ignorance about true costs. Sure $20 a month seems reasonable but multiply that times 12 and it doesn't seem quite as affordable. And don't forget that this monthly expense is FOREVER and that Adobe at any time can raise it.
Another thing mention in this video was that GIMP doesn't have non-destructive editing without making any effort to see if that was in the works for a future version. (It's going to be part of the next major release.) It also said that community developed software has slow release cycles which isn't necessarily true. Just take a look at how quickly the 3D software Blender has developed. It is rapidly catching up to its commercial competitors and is surpassing many of them. If GIMP had a foundation structured like the Blender Foundation it might be developing as quickly.
CMYK support might be a big issue if you are in print but most doing photo editing aren't. Many of the whiz-bang features that Adobe keeps stuffing into Photoshop aren't things useful enough to justify the increased cost.
Another thing this video completely ignored was that there might be any other software that could be competitive other than GIMP, free or otherwise. There is. For instance for a one time purchase of $50 you can buy Affinity Photo which does most of the key things that people use Photoshop for, including having non-destructive editing built into it. Sure it might not have AI but isn't Adobe facilitating the demise of their own customers with their uncritical embrace of it?
I never got comfortable enough with the interface of GIMP to want to make it my photo editing app of choice and Adobe's constant desire to dip into your pocket has given me second thoughts about Photoshop, as well as the rest of their offerings. They've already made their money long ago and don't need mine.
GIMP is all u need
Adobe CC subscription model fully Sucks 100%💩
Krita is better than all of those. But i think its exclusive to Linux only.
krait running on windows too.
@@MohamedEssam-gx9vhKrita is focused on digital illustration, so I don't know how good it is for photo editing. Beside that, Krita runs on pretty much every system: Linux, Windows, MacOS, iPad OS, Chrome OS, and Android (beta).
krita and gimp does two different things im afraid.
I like Krita for its digital drawing and painting capabilities and for those reasons I think it is a great replacement for Photoshop. It might need some work to make it more crash proof but I'm sure that will come with time. For doing that I see absolutely no reason to pay for Photoshop. I haven't really tried it for photo editing, since it doesn't really seem to be designed for that, but I'm sure for a lot of people it would work fine for that. (I use Affinity Photo for my photo editing needs.)