It get weirder if you change it manually to English. At one point it put that he said "...nudist se grinder gamecube young world press freedom drive kart racing."
Irish sheep farmers all over again! _"...well then fine ass... and there wasn't the sheep discount out tonight... did you have a good dog a boo-boo dragon..."_
@Herra Tossavainen And exactly what kind of s**t do you think must be told about "blacks" or "jews" (the entire ethnic group)? I truly believe that there is nothing to say about any entire ethnic group, just to some ideologies (like US version of liberalism) o individuals.
There are only two options, it's massive racism because evil borns from intelligence, an animal can't be evil, only the closest to human animals show evil. Or it's because they considering they so backwards, ignorant and child like that all its another's one fault, my little child is very good, some one misled him. Child are not accountable. The second one it's more probable, it's also racist, but not so massively.
That being said colonialism fucked africa pretty bad and exacerbates some already existing problems. Which doesn't deny people's right to be potentially violent, crazy, evil... etc
@Kvothe Windrunner I'm sure you believe and like your Department of Defense approved media, but the only people Communists killed in mass were fascists and imperialists in liberatory movements. Nothing wrong that.
@Kvothe Windrunner Completely and utter wrong, you played directly right into the hands of capitalists. They laid out the bait and you took it. www.greanvillepost.com/2018/10/09/the-truth-about-the-soviet-gulag-surprisingly-revealed-by-the-cia/ The author of the gulag archipelago, as well as his wife, said the book was a work of fiction! He was also a fascist who praised Franco on spanish TV, and was disappointed when the Nazis surrendered. He deserted the red army instead of staying and fighting the nazis hahaha. There are anti-communist professors you know, they authored those studies. They come from the black book of communism, which lists Nazi soldiers as 'victims of communism' hahaha if those were the types of people that communists genocided, I wish they had killed 10x more. Mao killed a tremendous amount of imperialists, and their sympathizers, yes. There is absolutely nothing wrong with protecting your country from people who want to sell it's resources and people's labor off to the highest bidding foreign power. Globalist economy is the death nationalism and cultural & social relations. Mao did the right thing, it paid off, China is the most powerful country on earth now, and they're not even finished building the conditions for socialist transition while maintaining their social customs and nationalism. Yes they also lied about Hitler but I'm not a brain dead rightard so I don't care.
@Augustus Mars oh yes kill commies for trying to help society progress further in equality and societal well being, assuring basic necessities for everyone. they're so evil that they even kill violent racists and imperialists lol you're either a rich kid or extremely stupid
agree, i think this is what poisoned all conversations of this age, everyone is the vessel of morality, like "why hear what others are saying if im right since the begining?"
@Michael Cueva you're mostly right, just what Nietzsche meant in detail was that god is a creation of humans, used to keep people on track and not do evil. Throughout history this was a very important authority because people feared god and therefore did as they were told by him and maybe him only. But society has evolved and as you said a moral code has been established outside church and religious guidelines, laws are in place and work as well. So there is no more need for a god and many people abandoned the idea of his existence, hence he "died".
Easier for them to win all the arguments when they insist on doing all the framing, invent all the terminology, and definitions! Don't fall for it. Just because they have their framework doesn't mean I have to abandon mine even if they insist on judging me for it.
"moral high ground" is a void concept, since a _person_ has no "morality" property, only actions can _sometimes_ be characterized as moral or immoral. The only thing a person _is_ , is a _person_ . They are not virtuous or evil, good or bad, moral or immoral, intelligent or stupid. Only actions can _sometimes_ be classified as such.
To say nothing of his disgust habit of compulsively wiping (dozens of times), coughing etc. . his work full of "I'm so clever" wordplay, and obfuscation.
I can’t help it I just love Zisek. He simply always seems to find the essential subject and it’s always highly original. The real struggle is to find universality! Spot-on
What fascinates me the most is his ability to argue complex ideas in the simplest way, rarely diverging to long from the main line. The lamest individual could comprehend his points, but when you read comments on his videos, you somewhat get the picture of the mainstream mentality. Zizek here literally argued what I have been thinking about for a long time and could never summarise it.
It's weird that liberalism and socialism/ communism is put in the same branch of politics in the US, and that liberalism is on the left in the US. In France Liberalism is more on the right with the Republicans.
@@Rayhuntter Wrong. Sometimes liberalism denotes an economic structure and other times it refers to social liberalism. In the case above hes refering to the social liberal types. Not everything is a capitalist conspiracy
@@MrHamtits and people on the economic left are intentionally associated with the so called "social liberals" by the ruling capitalist class when they have nothing to do with each other. Capitalist propaganda 101, if ever there was one.
You do understand touching your face is not a medically dangerous act in itself, right? He's under personal isolation right now, would you think that his house furniture is infested with the Coronavirus and he shouldn't touch his face after he moves a chair or what? lol
Strong accent, funky respiratory problems and an excellent and accurate analysis. The most powerful way of uniting different people is through their similar antagonisms.
@@parishermianos5159 Do you think you will survive that? I really wonder why he does that, is he taking speed or coke or is his nose just itching from the mustache and nose hair? I absolutely understand some of this when people are nervous, I tend to correct my hair all the time, but this is too much, he is even pulling up like he tries to get all the rest stickig in the nose.
I have a friend who loves to announce to others that he is 'a citizen of nowhere' , and I can always see the boast in this: '' nearly everyone is tied to their cultural and national identity and so handicapped by their biased and narrow minded outlook , only a handful of culturally advanced people like ME can see clearly the realities of our world''.
"citizen of nowhere" sounds very American to me. In his attempt to be universalist, he has revealed his parochialism. We can only be so objective, and we can only expect others to be so objective. And this is not a bad thing unless we let it be. This, to me, is what internationalism, intersubjectivity, and solidarity are all about: recognizing there is no true, objective, universal perspective, but that we have to come together in a dialogue, a dialectic of different, subjective perspectives to find as much peace and understanding as possible.
I can give you a story that happend with me with Liberals. Few days back an actor was a judge on a LGBTQ show called Rupaul drag race and he called out the audacity of one non-muslim contestant who wore hijab in his drag costume and asked him if islam is anti gay! You cant imagine the backlash that liberals had upon this actor. So i tweeted back to one of the famous ones and told him that I’m living in a muslim country and applauded the gesture and he continued to teach what islam is really about keep in mind he’s white non muslim teaching me, the one raised muslim, after two day there was purge campaign against homosexuals during the “holy” month of ramadan so i sent him pictures and links about it and HE BLOCKED ME this is the NEW LEFT all political correctness and no true principles
I'm against PC-politics to some extent. I dont think hate speech should be allowed. We saw what happened to Jews after centuries of demonisation in Europe and we also see other forms of this ingroup-outgroup identity politics of the right wing (Mexicans & Muslims) and their consequence on hate crimes. Thats why I dont buy into this. Also: It's not the US' job to police the world or get involved in business that's not there's. Eventhough they dont admit it however this was and this still is the ultimate foreign policy of the DC establishment represented by folks Biden, Obama or Bush. They're all the same when it comes to exploiting the world.
Well I guess I am against hypocrisy right now. We can't tolerate hypocrisy right?? As like other Abrahamic religion, Islam is indeed anti-homosexual so what has he done to you is baffled me. Just do not understand why they support an ideology that is against their very basic value. Tobe honest, this is frustating. They should be in the front line to fight for their values regardless of any religions
Yeah but that's a pretty stupid idea to imply that Islam is uniquely anti-gay. I mean thanks to Christianity, half of Africa is vehemently anti-gay to the point where you can even get the death penalty for being gay. A lot of this kind of legislation was thanks to evangelicals from America lobbying in their governments. Christian Eastern Europe isn't particularly friendly to gay either. So no, the problem isn't Islam but rather the people using Islam to push their homophobic agenda. Its the same shit as some Christians in Europe and the states. As with everything, you can't just paint a black and white image. Liberals do this, and judging by your comment, you seem to also be doing this. Ironically, even in this video Slavoj talks positively of Muslims (Malcolm X)
a struggle they'd have to conduct essentially against themselves. Either in the sense that many of them are Bourgeois to begin with, or wish they were Bourgeois and hence have to fight against their pavlovianly conditioned desires.
I see a lot of posters here who should be reading the world socialist website www.wsws.org/ For a clear analysis of the right wing politcs of identity politcs this website hits the nail on the head.
Zizek puts himself in a very difficult position: having to explain that 'liberal' ethos, narratives and perspective are somewhat correct and necessary to a certain point and at the same time explaining the ideological limitations of these same ethos, narratives and perspectives and the underlying problems these people impose on any serious project for revolutionary change.
6:31 typing this to remember this really interesting point: Asserted universality of identity still presumes particular authority on the measure and structure of the space on which identity is placed. If you say you think everybody is equal, you force everyone to be equal in your definition of equal, which is a word that is often deeply loaded with subjectivity
@@laurier3348 LMAO... you're replying to a fascist and going off about rationality and "souls"... Good grief what a clutserfuck of stupid the comment sections is.
“The true struggle is the struggle for universality”. If liberals admitted to this they’d have to drop their Id.Pol. BE and actually have solidarity with the poor and working class. The one thing liberals are loathe to do is help the poor, or cede that their own wealth may be immoral.
What is 'immoral' is but a matter of perspective, your perpsective of immoral defines who you are, so as soon as you get to define what is immoral or not, you gain identity, I cant see how its possible to close the circle, unless Mother Nature rocks up with Covid-19 and asks you to choose your true moraility.
@@acidsunrise Indeed it does, by trying to be the smallest giant, you have to demand that the smallest dwarves be taller than you. How dare they have the temerity to position themselves so that you tower over them even when you are hunched over full of self loathing in uber victim mode.
@Jay Milla Liberals aren't pro-idpol. They're anti-white. White women and white LGBT people get shat on and are viewed with suspicion as potential traitors. Who is the main driving force behind anti-whiteness? The Culture of Critique: www.bitchute.com/video/KUkk9xisGinI/
@MrGuvnah I mean I don't know if she is really anti-white, I mean she did stan Sanders, despite being criticized for endorsing an "old white man" by the mainstream liberal media. What did she do to make you think this?
Its funny to me that one of the wealthiest homes in my suburb has written Black Lives Matter written in colored chalk in front of their very nice stone walkway. These are the same people who are too snobby to even wave to their neighbors. Obviously too good for the rest of us but very worried about black people. Its really weird.
it was pointed out to me by my Yugoslavian ethics teacher that he had some doorknocker come around to ask if he would donate for some far off place where children were hungry. he said to the person "well, what about the homeless guy that is three blocks from here every day? what will you do for him?" and the doorknocker got mightily offended and left. it's easier to love the poor afar off, when you think they are the victim of circumstance and hate the poor up close because they, by our system of virtues, brought it upon themselves.
@@anonymousee716 The difference is, the poor person in the far off country will worship the foreigner that helps him and narcissists flock to such opportunities.
The rabbi jokes really makes sense if youve come from a low income background and gone into academia. Arriving at a prestigious school on an academic scholarship it really hits home that you're an outsider, especially considering that everyone else is there because their parents can afford the six figure tuition fees. I always particular enjoyed hearing the working class be discussed at parties and social events. Like with all due respect, I could take you to my hometown, to the shittiest bar in the area, and show you just how wrong you actually are. Consider the following, Donald Trump swept union territories (i.e. Pennsylvania) because while he was promising them a future, the democratic party was more concerned with transgenderism, immigration and environmentalism. Maybe these issues are important, maybe they aren't, frankly I don care, nor have a solid opinion on the matter. But the average blue collar Joe simply doesn't concern himself with such matters (at least o in any meaningful way), rather he concerns himself with his work and income. There's a significant drift in what the party elites of the modern left believe, and what their voting constituents believe. I'm not hugely into politics, I mostly use this as a pleasant background noise whilst I conduct my research, but I feel I had to share what I had found, comming from such a unique perspective.
@Andrew Friend Hahaha. I chose to do my masters. I am strongly considering a PhD. Perhaps I am a psychopath, but I can say with the utmost certainty, that I am a masochist.
the same is happening in Malaysia, but a little different where the right supporters which usually comes from rural areas do not concern their leaders involved in corruption like pandora papers as long their future is guaranteed, even though it involves racism. For context, in Malaysia's constitution, there is a specific term used which directly translates to human rights exists as long as "the special status of Malays and bumiputeras( a race of indigenous but ironically it does not include all indigenous people and cultures) is preserved, on paper, it is a racist and discriminating law or idk what to call it. So with this so-called thing, we called "ketuanan Melayu" which directly translates to Malay supremacy. So their kids will have education, special privileges like a uni only accepting Malays, a hedge fund only for Malays, a school that only accept Malays and so on and so forth. As a Malay myself I understand this perspective and experience it first hand. where the left concerns are political correctness. Where they fight for equality, human rights, women rights, anti-corruption things and all other politically correct issues. A concept that is generally very insignificant towards the people in rural areas. This comes to a really weird situation where the highly privileged people trying to politically correct people in rural areas what they should do what should concern them, that idea is alien from them.
In our language there is a term for it - "кокетство". What these people do is called - "кокетничать". It means saying things about themselves just to provoke compliments towards themselves, or saying bad things about themselves implying that these are obviously not true.
In English, the concept you describe we call "fishing for compliments". However, this phenomenon also assumes a paradigm of sin and absolution which can only be conferred through religion (socjus, in this case).
I think we have a tendency to break down larger problems into smaller frameworks that we can easily assign solutions or fix. Classism and the consumerism that molds us into rigid predictable paths is often ignored by over exaggerated problems or caricatures of issues in society. There are people who are ostracized excessively for having certain conditions or identifying in one group or another. However it seems those that are hurting the most are rarely given attention. The solutions provided offer surface level acceptance usually that doesn't normalize whatever group they are seeking to help.
I was in high school when I read handmaids tale and I never liked it. I thought there was something wrong with me because my teacher pointed it out that I was the only one with that response from the rest of the girls in class. of course It was not for the same reasons as Zizek (Was just a kid from a charter school in a low income community) I might have to read it again to remember why I didn’t like it
If you didn't like it, we should probably put you in a re-education camp and give you therapy so we can "fix" you and then you'll like it, just like you are supposed to. At least that is what some other people in this thread would like to do.
how can so many people not recognize this? i can not get my head around it. i see literally half of my left friends sink deeeeeep into identity politics. And they never come out again - they are insulted if you point it out.
is this the voice actor from Command & Conquer: Red Alert? Subtitles would be good though, I literally didn't get any other part than when he was talking about the missile silos in Murmansk and submarine pens in Black Sea.
He speaking about human nature. We will never change .we are out of the garden ,pride always goes befor the fall ,gravity is ,u want beat Trump? Be more open ,more frank ,more honest.
This is perfect and exactly what I've been trying to do online. There are so many people who fell into the idea of Qanon. Those are the exact people we should reach out to and try to talk to. They are a very large base of people expressing that they are suffering under the establishment, and showing them that the "Deep State" they fear is just capitalism would be a great way getting a lot of people on board with our messaging. The problem I have with identity politics is while it is true we need to push for equality, we cant just ignore the issues of those who's social conditioning has lead them into a trap. We feed the narrative of conservatives when we attack all white people, because some people just don't understand what we are talking about. I also really like Zizek's take on the idea that all of the evil can be because of one group bc it also feeds into the same white supremist narrative of attributing some quality only to white people, and while we talk about all of this "whos to blame" shit we still arnt addressing the material concerns of the people who need help.
Exactly. Based and nuanced and actually focused on problem solving. In America (I'm assuming from what you said that we're both Americans here) politics has really shifted much more to "fixing" cultural and social issues rather than material/political/economic ones and this has made us a bunch of petty, squabbling birds fighting over crumbs of ideology instead of real projects. Most of us feel the real projects, the concrete, tangible stuff, is out of our hands now, and in many ways this is true, since we are in many ways living under a kind of oligarchy where state and corporate power have been merged. At least that's my understanding. We need to address the root problems again and stop focusing on "holding whites accountable" like the progressives say or "holding J*ws accountable" (censored so that hopefully my comment won't disappear) like the traditionalist right say.
this is not capitalism who created deep state. it's left-liberal oligarchy who did that. there are countries with capitalism and without deep state. and all socialist countries consisted of deep state for 100%. woke liberalism is a new colonialism
I think the challenging part tho is it seems that a large chunk of these people we need to change the minds of, will not listen. Then consider that really we need to convince those that vote far-right, and those people are likely even more entrenched. I agree with all this, and have felt this was for a while, but I think that this can only be a piece of the solution. We also need some cunning alongside.
This is why I’m skeptical of heritage months. You can dish out months to certain groups, but that only implies that the year itself is white. It reinforces white defaultism. Also, I’m so happy he talked a little about Malcolm X.
I don't think "the white society" is even the default at play here, really. We just don't have an easier way to talk about clinging to a troubled sense of universality than with racially loaded terms like "white liberals".
when you find out, could you tell me? from context, i think he is saying "the only truly objective perspective". meaning a perspective that is *not* culturally derived, it sits outside of all culture judging like the Eye of God. but this is impossible, because nearly every knowledge system rests within some kind of culture, and science as it is practiced rests within Western Judeo Christian culture, so it has some of that same culture's inherent biases. and nearly ALL cultures have within them the bias that their own culture is correct, and other cultures are incorrect depending upon how they vary by certain beliefs, practices, etc from one's own. don't know if that is correct, but farther than that i cannot go.
In my experience identity obsessed liberals also support every US/NATO “humanitarian” war and the efforts of the US and Europe to force liberal capitalism and social liberalism down the throat of every country in the world (or as in the case of, say, Saudi Arabia, they don’t care about repression because the west gets what they want from those countries). Compare to a place like Syria which is constantly punished for not allowing western capitalists to plunder it economically. Western foreign policy is very much based on cultural and/or economic supremacy and, ironically, upper middle class identity liberals obsessed with “white supremacy” largely support it. A question I often ask is why does the west (Greater Europe) think it has a right to dominate the entire world and dictate norms to other countries at gun point or with deadly economic “sanctions”? Should not countries be allowed to develop as they see fit, at their own pace without liberal capitalist imperialists breathing down their necks? Take North Africa and the Middle East (Western Asia) where the UK, France and the USA have been meddling in a major way for well over a hundred years by supporting despots, starting wars, fomenting coups etc. How can these countries ever work out their problems and progress socially and politically with the US and its European vassals wreaking deadly havoc throughout the region? Zizek and many on the left overlook present day imperialism completely.
I see a lot of posters here who should be reading the world socialist website www.wsws.org/ For a clear analysis of the right wing politcs of identity politcs this website hits the nail on the head.
Please, Africa gets enough aid, that in comparison---the Marshal plan could have rebuilt Europe 100 times. Failed cultures need excuses. Imperialism isn't why Africa didn't invent "texting" but Tiny Israel only 70 yrs old did. Excuses excuses
when you find out, could you tell me? from context, i think he is saying "the only truly objective perspective". meaning a perspective that is *not* culturally derived, it sits outside of all culture judging like the Eye of God. but this is impossible, because nearly every knowledge system rests within some kind of culture, and science as it is practiced rests within Western Judeo Christian culture, so it has some of that same culture's inherent biases. and nearly ALL cultures have within them the bias that their own culture is correct, and other cultures are incorrect depending upon how they vary by certain beliefs, practices, etc from one's own. don't know if that is correct, but farther than that i cannot go.
The universality refers to the Marxist proposition that liberation of the individual will only be achieved if everyone has the same access to rights/means. So instead of viewing yourself as an elitist self penalizing group (which actually maintains a power structure of who is the most ethically correct), you could work into how you could incorporate yourself and people from those unprivileged groups into the universality of equal rights and responsibilities.
To say that one side of the divide embraces identity politics more than the other is quite possibly the most ridiculous thing I have heard today. And I hear a lot of ridiculous things.
If you want to get Zizek's 'I WOULD PREFER NOT TO' t-shirt you can do so here:
i-would-prefer-not-to.com
You mean Bartleby's?
I feel showered with truth and saliva
😂😂😂😂omfg
LMFAO
HAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAUAUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH OMG OMG 😂 😂 🤣
One of those things fits in a grail and the other you won't find near it.
Amazing sentence
I activated subtitles to understand his english and the subtitles thinks he's speaking italian
Same haha
It get weirder if you change it manually to English. At one point it put that he said "...nudist se grinder gamecube young world press freedom drive kart racing."
Irish sheep farmers all over again! _"...well then fine ass... and there wasn't the sheep discount out tonight... did you have a good dog a boo-boo dragon..."_
you should practice more of the english
Probably something to do how often he moves his hands.
“We are not even allowed to be evil on our own.”
So accurate!
@Herra Tossavainen And exactly what kind of s**t do you think must be told about "blacks" or "jews" (the entire ethnic group)? I truly believe that there is nothing to say about any entire ethnic group, just to some ideologies (like US version of liberalism) o individuals.
There are only two options, it's massive racism because evil borns from intelligence, an animal can't be evil, only the closest to human animals show evil.
Or it's because they considering they so backwards, ignorant and child like that all its another's one fault, my little child is very good, some one misled him. Child are not accountable.
The second one it's more probable, it's also racist, but not so massively.
That being said colonialism fucked africa pretty bad and exacerbates some already existing problems. Which doesn't deny people's right to be potentially violent, crazy, evil... etc
It is a way to congratulate yourself for having the right ideas without having to do absolutely anything at all about them.
And covers up the more important issue of economic class
That's a good way to put it
@Kvothe Windrunner I'm sure you believe and like your Department of Defense approved media, but the only people Communists killed in mass were fascists and imperialists in liberatory movements. Nothing wrong that.
@Kvothe Windrunner Completely and utter wrong, you played directly right into the hands of capitalists. They laid out the bait and you took it.
www.greanvillepost.com/2018/10/09/the-truth-about-the-soviet-gulag-surprisingly-revealed-by-the-cia/
The author of the gulag archipelago, as well as his wife, said the book was a work of fiction! He was also a fascist who praised Franco on spanish TV, and was disappointed when the Nazis surrendered. He deserted the red army instead of staying and fighting the nazis hahaha.
There are anti-communist professors you know, they authored those studies. They come from the black book of communism, which lists Nazi soldiers as 'victims of communism' hahaha if those were the types of people that communists genocided, I wish they had killed 10x more.
Mao killed a tremendous amount of imperialists, and their sympathizers, yes. There is absolutely nothing wrong with protecting your country from people who want to sell it's resources and people's labor off to the highest bidding foreign power. Globalist economy is the death nationalism and cultural & social relations. Mao did the right thing, it paid off, China is the most powerful country on earth now, and they're not even finished building the conditions for socialist transition while maintaining their social customs and nationalism.
Yes they also lied about Hitler but I'm not a brain dead rightard so I don't care.
@Augustus Mars oh yes kill commies for trying to help society progress further in equality and societal well being, assuring basic necessities for everyone. they're so evil that they even kill violent racists and imperialists lol you're either a rich kid or extremely stupid
Being on moral high ground automatically makes you feel like you always win the arguments.
agree, i think this is what poisoned all conversations of this age, everyone is the vessel of morality, like "why hear what others are saying if im right since the begining?"
@Michael Cueva you're mostly right, just what Nietzsche meant in detail was that god is a creation of humans, used to keep people on track and not do evil. Throughout history this was a very important authority because people feared god and therefore did as they were told by him and maybe him only. But society has evolved and as you said a moral code has been established outside church and religious guidelines, laws are in place and work as well. So there is no more need for a god and many people abandoned the idea of his existence, hence he "died".
Easier for them to win all the arguments when they insist on doing all the framing, invent all the terminology, and definitions! Don't fall for it. Just because they have their framework doesn't mean I have to abandon mine even if they insist on judging me for it.
@@rafaelcomfsemph Nicely said!
"moral high ground" is a void concept, since a _person_ has no "morality" property, only actions can _sometimes_ be characterized as moral or immoral. The only thing a person _is_ , is a _person_ . They are not virtuous or evil, good or bad, moral or immoral, intelligent or stupid. Only actions can _sometimes_ be classified as such.
He reminds me of my father, he was also a philosopher. Miss him a lot.
your dad sounds like he was an awesome guy. I'm sorry for your loss
Yeah, Bless your heart Mister.
💚
Don't lie bro I know your dad...
May he Rest In Peace.
The importance of his message is equally proportionate to the difficulty of listening to it..
To say nothing of his disgust habit of compulsively wiping (dozens of times), coughing etc. . his work full of "I'm so clever" wordplay, and obfuscation.
Prof Zizek is possibly quite interesting in written form.
Just, gosh... the speech impediment and thick accent.
@Richard B you're disgusting dude, he is smart & learned.
I understand everything he sais without any problems
Yeah I didn't get a word of it and closed captions won't work lol
Edit: actually they do work but it doesn't look English
I can’t help it I just love Zisek. He simply always seems to find the essential subject and it’s always highly original. The real struggle is to find universality! Spot-on
I barely understand what the hell he's talking about, but he's entertaining nonetheless.
This dude is literally and figuratively spitting facts.
What fascinates me the most is his ability to argue complex ideas in the simplest way, rarely diverging to long from the main line.
The lamest individual could comprehend his points, but when you read comments on his videos, you somewhat get the picture of the mainstream mentality.
Zizek here literally argued what I have been thinking about for a long time and could never summarise it.
It's weird that liberalism and socialism/ communism is put in the same branch of politics in the US, and that liberalism is on the left in the US. In France Liberalism is more on the right with the Republicans.
it's a strategy used by capitalist propagandists - reductio ad absurdum. Otherwise there is a risk that ordinary people wake up to reality.
@@Rayhuntter Wrong. Sometimes liberalism denotes an economic structure and other times it refers to social liberalism. In the case above hes refering to the social liberal types.
Not everything is a capitalist conspiracy
@@MrHamtits and people on the economic left are intentionally associated with the so called "social liberals" by the ruling capitalist class when they have nothing to do with each other. Capitalist propaganda 101, if ever there was one.
Socialists in America hijacked the word liberal in the 20s. They thought they could be an easier sell with that label.
@@bdfunke liberals in America are anti-socialist. Neoliberalism = global capitalism.
I wonder how Slavoj is doing with the whole
"not touching your face" thing during Covid-19 LOL
The longest he's lasted is 10 minute and by then he looked like he was about to explode, just GOTTA do the cocaine nose thing
Also, the way he practically sneezes when he talks.... seems a bit contagious to me 😂
Man needs to step outside the library and work on his immune system.
Jeffrey Gillespie mind your own fucking business
You do understand touching your face is not a medically dangerous act in itself, right? He's under personal isolation right now, would you think that his house furniture is infested with the Coronavirus and he shouldn't touch his face after he moves a chair or what? lol
Strong accent, funky respiratory problems and an excellent and accurate analysis. The most powerful way of uniting different people is through their similar antagonisms.
He reminds me of my father always high on speed and trying to warn me of the end of the world
So what do you think now after Chaz and all the shit that happends in the US by liberals still don't think its going down the drain ?
This got a laugh out of me congrats
@@maximbaazov nah i think he just spits facts but he does sound like a cryptic father
One day I want to play a snorting game, when he does the thing with his nose, you snort a line
@@parishermianos5159 Do you think you will survive that? I really wonder why he does that, is he taking speed or coke or is his nose just itching from the mustache and nose hair? I absolutely understand some of this when people are nervous, I tend to correct my hair all the time, but this is too much, he is even pulling up like he tries to get all the rest stickig in the nose.
He even starts to look like Hegel.
Holy smokes! I see it now.
I have a friend who loves to announce to others that he is 'a citizen of nowhere' , and I can always see the boast in this: '' nearly everyone is tied to their cultural and national identity and so handicapped by their biased and narrow minded outlook , only a handful of culturally advanced people like ME can see clearly the realities of our world''.
That is true in a sense though. Why do you marry yourself to these hierarchies that are against you?
"citizen of nowhere" sounds very American to me. In his attempt to be universalist, he has revealed his parochialism. We can only be so objective, and we can only expect others to be so objective. And this is not a bad thing unless we let it be. This, to me, is what internationalism, intersubjectivity, and solidarity are all about: recognizing there is no true, objective, universal perspective, but that we have to come together in a dialogue, a dialectic of different, subjective perspectives to find as much peace and understanding as possible.
@@GalacticNovaOverlord That would make for au uprooted and confused person. It's a handicap, not an advantage, imo.
cultural and national identities are fascistic and satanic.
Your friend claims to have achieved superhuman objectivity.
I can give you a story that happend with me with Liberals. Few days back an actor was a judge on a LGBTQ show called Rupaul drag race and he called out the audacity of one non-muslim contestant who wore hijab in his drag costume and asked him if islam is anti gay! You cant imagine the backlash that liberals had upon this actor. So i tweeted back to one of the famous ones and told him that I’m living in a muslim country and applauded the gesture and he continued to teach what islam is really about keep in mind he’s white non muslim teaching me, the one raised muslim, after two day there was purge campaign against homosexuals during the “holy” month of ramadan so i sent him pictures and links about it and HE BLOCKED ME this is the NEW LEFT all political correctness and no true principles
I'm against PC-politics to some extent. I dont think hate speech should be allowed. We saw what happened to Jews after centuries of demonisation in Europe and we also see other forms of this ingroup-outgroup identity politics of the right wing (Mexicans & Muslims) and their consequence on hate crimes. Thats why I dont buy into this. Also: It's not the US' job to police the world or get involved in business that's not there's. Eventhough they dont admit it however this was and this still is the ultimate foreign policy of the DC establishment represented by folks Biden, Obama or Bush. They're all the same when it comes to exploiting the world.
M E
You hit the nail on the head. Identity politcs is right wing, racist politcs, masquerading as progressive or leftwing.
Timemaster f
Who is he?
Well I guess I am against hypocrisy right now. We can't tolerate hypocrisy right?? As like other Abrahamic religion, Islam is indeed anti-homosexual so what has he done to you is baffled me. Just do not understand why they support an ideology that is against their very basic value. Tobe honest, this is frustating. They should be in the front line to fight for their values regardless of any religions
Yeah but that's a pretty stupid idea to imply that Islam is uniquely anti-gay. I mean thanks to Christianity, half of Africa is vehemently anti-gay to the point where you can even get the death penalty for being gay. A lot of this kind of legislation was thanks to evangelicals from America lobbying in their governments. Christian Eastern Europe isn't particularly friendly to gay either. So no, the problem isn't Islam but rather the people using Islam to push their homophobic agenda. Its the same shit as some Christians in Europe and the states. As with everything, you can't just paint a black and white image. Liberals do this, and judging by your comment, you seem to also be doing this. Ironically, even in this video Slavoj talks positively of Muslims (Malcolm X)
because otherwise they'd have to join the struggle
a struggle they'd have to conduct essentially against themselves. Either in the sense that many of them are Bourgeois to begin with, or wish they were Bourgeois and hence have to fight against their pavlovianly conditioned desires.
lol -Zizek espouses fem rhetoric. He is just as involved in identity politics as anyone else.
I see a lot of posters here who should be reading the world socialist website
www.wsws.org/
For a clear analysis of the right wing politcs of identity politcs this website hits the nail on the head.
still best channel posting Zizek
That initial joke is classic
I like your name
how is your inferno doing?
Zizek is such a smart guy. Dissapointing to see so many comments about his tics and not his ideas.
Add your comment to the list
Yes agree its stupid make fun of tics but alsp nothing to get offend of that .
@@WheelChairwayToHeaven Wow you're so smart
“You reserve for yourself the universal position” 💯
Zizek puts himself in a very difficult position: having to explain that 'liberal' ethos, narratives and perspective are somewhat correct and necessary to a certain point and at the same time explaining the ideological limitations of these same ethos, narratives and perspectives and the underlying problems these people impose on any serious project for revolutionary change.
6:31 typing this to remember this really interesting point: Asserted universality of identity still presumes particular authority on the measure and structure of the space on which identity is placed.
If you say you think everybody is equal, you force everyone to be equal in your definition of equal, which is a word that is often deeply loaded with subjectivity
Moral relativism is the way to go.
With your words !
Wow this is great I wish more people could hear this
Argumentação de alta qualidade.
I’m never sharing a wrap with this dude
"Nostalgia for the present." Awesome term. 🤣😅
Video thumbnail is priceless!!
Wow that’s such a cool idea which he discusses about Malcom X’s use of X.
Identity politics is the 'divide et impera' of human rights
yes it is ! People will follow any apparent racial issue,any issue except corporate rule.
We need more marxist professors on universities to make identity politics great again.
@Augustus Mars they are already in hell, they lost contact with the real world, poor souls.
@@laurier3348 LMAO... you're replying to a fascist and going off about rationality and "souls"...
Good grief what a clutserfuck of stupid the comment sections is.
@@robertstan298 Fascism and socialism are both big government bureaucracies oppressing the people.
Alguma alma bondosa legende esse vídeo! ♥️
“The true struggle is the struggle for universality”. If liberals admitted to this they’d have to drop their Id.Pol. BE and actually have solidarity with the poor and working class. The one thing liberals are loathe to do is help the poor, or cede that their own wealth may be immoral.
What is 'immoral' is but a matter of perspective, your perpsective of immoral defines who you are, so as soon as you get to define what is immoral or not, you gain identity, I cant see how its possible to close the circle, unless Mother Nature rocks up with Covid-19 and asks you to choose your true moraility.
Yes-as Slavoj pointed out victimhood has great value.
@@acidsunrise Indeed it does, by trying to be the smallest giant, you have to demand that the smallest dwarves be taller than you. How dare they have the temerity to position themselves so that you tower over them even when you are hunched over full of self loathing in uber victim mode.
Gary Lake .Very well put.
@Jay Milla
Liberals aren't pro-idpol. They're anti-white. White women and white LGBT people get shat on and are viewed with suspicion as potential traitors.
Who is the main driving force behind anti-whiteness? The Culture of Critique: www.bitchute.com/video/KUkk9xisGinI/
OMG - this is so bang on the nail head!
Here's the paradox: How can a person empathize with someone that they have nothing but contempt for?
Because it's not about empathy, it's about soft control.
Easy: by realizing that you do you for yourself and that Trump doesn't offer any solutions, even if it entails voting for a woke ditzy bartender.
you are confusing empathy and sympathy. You are not the only person who has this problem.
way to miss the whole point
@MrGuvnah I mean I don't know if she is really anti-white, I mean she did stan Sanders, despite being criticized for endorsing an "old white man" by the mainstream liberal media. What did she do to make you think this?
This was interesting...and so on...and so on.
Excellent points.
Absolutely brilliant first point.
Its funny to me that one of the wealthiest homes in my suburb has written Black Lives Matter written in colored chalk in front of their very nice stone walkway. These are the same people who are too snobby to even wave to their neighbors. Obviously too good for the rest of us but very worried about black people. Its really weird.
it was pointed out to me by my Yugoslavian ethics teacher that he had some doorknocker come around to ask if he would donate for some far off place where children were hungry. he said to the person "well, what about the homeless guy that is three blocks from here every day? what will you do for him?" and the doorknocker got mightily offended and left.
it's easier to love the poor afar off, when you think they are the victim of circumstance and hate the poor up close because they, by our system of virtues, brought it upon themselves.
They're not worried about black people. They are worried about how they're perceived by their fellow snobs.
LOL
@@anonymousee716 The difference is, the poor person in the far off country will worship the foreigner that helps him and narcissists flock to such opportunities.
It’s a Star Trek fantasy.
All the alien races have ethnic identities while the humans are a universality.
Ted Kaczynski said all of this in Industrial Society and Its Future in 1995.
I recognise you friend
Based and Ted pilled.
I think that was one of the first TED talks. Then he decided to become Santa Claus, mailing surprises to naughty kids.
The rabbi jokes really makes sense if youve come from a low income background and gone into academia.
Arriving at a prestigious school on an academic scholarship it really hits home that you're an outsider, especially considering that everyone else is there because their parents can afford the six figure tuition fees.
I always particular enjoyed hearing the working class be discussed at parties and social events. Like with all due respect, I could take you to my hometown, to the shittiest bar in the area, and show you just how wrong you actually are. Consider the following, Donald Trump swept union territories (i.e. Pennsylvania) because while he was promising them a future, the democratic party was more concerned with transgenderism, immigration and environmentalism. Maybe these issues are important, maybe they aren't, frankly I don care, nor have a solid opinion on the matter. But the average blue collar Joe simply doesn't concern himself with such matters (at least o in any meaningful way), rather he concerns himself with his work and income. There's a significant drift in what the party elites of the modern left believe, and what their voting constituents believe.
I'm not hugely into politics, I mostly use this as a pleasant background noise whilst I conduct my research, but I feel I had to share what I had found, comming from such a unique perspective.
"the last respectable prejudice"
Thank you.
@Andrew Friend Hahaha. I chose to do my masters. I am strongly considering a PhD. Perhaps I am a psychopath, but I can say with the utmost certainty, that I am a masochist.
the same is happening in Malaysia, but a little different
where the right supporters which usually comes from rural areas do not concern their leaders involved in corruption like pandora papers as long their future is guaranteed, even though it involves racism. For context, in Malaysia's constitution, there is a specific term used which directly translates to human rights exists as long as "the special status of Malays and bumiputeras( a race of indigenous but ironically it does not include all indigenous people and cultures) is preserved, on paper, it is a racist and discriminating law or idk what to call it. So with this so-called thing, we called "ketuanan Melayu" which directly translates to Malay supremacy. So their kids will have education, special privileges like a uni only accepting Malays, a hedge fund only for Malays, a school that only accept Malays and so on and so forth. As a Malay myself I understand this perspective and experience it first hand.
where the left concerns are political correctness. Where they fight for equality, human rights, women rights, anti-corruption things and all other politically correct issues. A concept that is generally very insignificant towards the people in rural areas. This comes to a really weird situation where the highly privileged people trying to politically correct people in rural areas what they should do what should concern them, that idea is alien from them.
I mean there is also a lot of fear mongering about trans people and immigrants, those "culture war" issues have also played a role.
Everytime I see his videos I end clinged up on knowing exactly which are the books behind the examples that he sets
In our language there is a term for it - "кокетство". What these people do is called - "кокетничать". It means saying things about themselves just to provoke compliments towards themselves, or saying bad things about themselves implying that these are obviously not true.
In English, the concept you describe we call "fishing for compliments". However, this phenomenon also assumes a paradigm of sin and absolution which can only be conferred through religion (socjus, in this case).
That sounds like a French word.
@@bob45 It is. The word is 'coquette', in English 'to play the coquette'... The subtext of flirtation is very strong in either English or Russian.
"We are not even allowed to be evil on our own."
"Nostalgia for the present"
PR campaign: "remember not to touch your face, to lower the risk of contracting Covid."
Zizek: "Enjoy your symptom"
Kai Bekkeli He really needs to stay home in these difficult days.
@@user-fy5vf4hx1h he is. these are uploads from old seminars lol
Joshua Kaye I’m glad to hear that.
That's not what PR (also known as propaganda) is, dumbass.
I think you meant PSA.
Also Zizek: The woman is the symptom of man.
I really like listening to Zizek but I need good English subtitles.
Magical !
I love how he speaks for everybody.
0:19!
If Peterson is Kermit this guy's Daffy Duck
Haha
that is kind of cute
Bahahahahaha
lmao
😆
I think we have a tendency to break down larger problems into smaller frameworks that we can easily assign solutions or fix. Classism and the consumerism that molds us into rigid predictable paths is often ignored by over exaggerated problems or caricatures of issues in society.
There are people who are ostracized excessively for having certain conditions or identifying in one group or another. However it seems those that are hurting the most are rarely given attention. The solutions provided offer surface level acceptance usually that doesn't normalize whatever group they are seeking to help.
very relevant for June 2020
This is quite a well reasoned argument
Why are there always no subtitles in zizek's videos?? We definitely need them
In another Slavoj video, UA-cam captions thought he was speaking Dutch. Now they think he's speaking Italian. He's clearly speaking Salivan.
So on and so on
Universaly particular and so on and so on
Zizek is certainly a brilliant thinker, if one does their best to get over his speech impediment and is able to tune it out and listen carefully.
it's a good thing he apologizes every time he uses that joke because I've heard him tell that joke about 8 times
beautiful, beautiful
This is so true. Lol, I'm reading , The Handsmaid's Tale, tight now.
Classic zizek: 5:32 " and So on and so on, Sniff Sniff"
universalism ... a good thing for all of us today.
The inspiration for John malcovic’s character in rounders
Nostalgia for the present. 10:00
This might be the best 11 minutes of Zizek ever recorded.
Autogenerated captions are in Italian as opposed to English, OP.
Pretty hilarious though
Probably because of the gratuitous use of hand gestures ;)
Last time I watched a Zizek vid they were in Dutch. No joke.
Slovenia livid rn.
awesome
It's a psychotic condition called "White Guilt"
I was in high school when I read handmaids tale and I never liked it. I thought there was something wrong with me because my teacher pointed it out that I was the only one with that response from the rest of the girls in class. of course It was not for the same reasons as Zizek (Was just a kid from a charter school in a low income community) I might have to read it again to remember why I didn’t like it
If you didn't like it, we should probably put you in a re-education camp and give you therapy so we can "fix" you and then you'll like it, just like you are supposed to. At least that is what some other people in this thread would like to do.
how can so many people not recognize this?
i can not get my head around it. i see literally half of my left friends sink deeeeeep into identity politics. And they never come out again - they are insulted if you point it out.
is this the voice actor from Command & Conquer: Red Alert? Subtitles would be good though, I literally didn't get any other part than when he was talking about the missile silos in Murmansk and submarine pens in Black Sea.
if there were a book to get from slavoj for beginners, what would it be?
This is actually very insightful and deeply correct
He speaking about human nature. We will never change .we are out of the garden ,pride always goes befor the fall ,gravity is ,u want beat Trump? Be more open ,more frank ,more honest.
The not entirely rare but uncommon quick one-two sniffle is my favourite atm
If anybody wants to do a voice over in any voice but this voice I would watch all your videos
I hope the folks in the first row brought umbrellas
This is perfect and exactly what I've been trying to do online. There are so many people who fell into the idea of Qanon. Those are the exact people we should reach out to and try to talk to. They are a very large base of people expressing that they are suffering under the establishment, and showing them that the "Deep State" they fear is just capitalism would be a great way getting a lot of people on board with our messaging. The problem I have with identity politics is while it is true we need to push for equality, we cant just ignore the issues of those who's social conditioning has lead them into a trap. We feed the narrative of conservatives when we attack all white people, because some people just don't understand what we are talking about. I also really like Zizek's take on the idea that all of the evil can be because of one group bc it also feeds into the same white supremist narrative of attributing some quality only to white people, and while we talk about all of this "whos to blame" shit we still arnt addressing the material concerns of the people who need help.
@August 12 2022 The Movie then read it again until you do.
@August 12 2022 pratice your reading skills
Exactly. Based and nuanced and actually focused on problem solving. In America (I'm assuming from what you said that we're both Americans here) politics has really shifted much more to "fixing" cultural and social issues rather than material/political/economic ones and this has made us a bunch of petty, squabbling birds fighting over crumbs of ideology instead of real projects. Most of us feel the real projects, the concrete, tangible stuff, is out of our hands now, and in many ways this is true, since we are in many ways living under a kind of oligarchy where state and corporate power have been merged. At least that's my understanding. We need to address the root problems again and stop focusing on "holding whites accountable" like the progressives say or "holding J*ws accountable" (censored so that hopefully my comment won't disappear) like the traditionalist right say.
this is not capitalism who created deep state. it's left-liberal oligarchy who did that. there are countries with capitalism and without deep state. and all socialist countries consisted of deep state for 100%. woke liberalism is a new colonialism
I think the challenging part tho is it seems that a large chunk of these people we need to change the minds of, will not listen. Then consider that really we need to convince those that vote far-right, and those people are likely even more entrenched.
I agree with all this, and have felt this was for a while, but I think that this can only be a piece of the solution. We also need some cunning alongside.
I know the irony of my words, but thank God for Slavov Zizek!!!
I’ve never heard a person I so dislike to listen to more than this guy.
That is the greatest way to put it that I've ever heard. Now I understand myself a bit better. Cheers.
Hi! is there any book by Zizek about this particulary tendency of the actual left?
Zizek: Let's not treat each other as individuals. "let's link our antagonisms." (?)☹️ But the first part of this is excellent.
This is why I’m skeptical of heritage months. You can dish out months to certain groups, but that only implies that the year itself is white. It reinforces white defaultism.
Also, I’m so happy he talked a little about Malcolm X.
I don't think "the white society" is even the default at play here, really. We just don't have an easier way to talk about clinging to a troubled sense of universality than with racially loaded terms like "white liberals".
Turning on subtitles is fun
we aim to treat all people equally rather than divide them into groups so they can be easily dismissed.
What is Zizek refering to when he uses the term 'universality'?
when you find out, could you tell me?
from context, i think he is saying "the only truly objective perspective". meaning a perspective that is *not* culturally derived, it sits outside of all culture judging like the Eye of God. but this is impossible, because nearly every knowledge system rests within some kind of culture, and science as it is practiced rests within Western Judeo Christian culture, so it has some of that same culture's inherent biases. and nearly ALL cultures have within them the bias that their own culture is correct, and other cultures are incorrect depending upon how they vary by certain beliefs, practices, etc from one's own.
don't know if that is correct, but farther than that i cannot go.
When the doctors said that we shouldn't touch our faces, I thought "I hope Zizek is ok"
How many ads can you fit into a 11 minute video? I think I had 4 or 5.
The Classics.
For gods sake somebody give that man a handkerchief.
he has a tick, always had this "problem"
a handkerchief. Right. coming right up.
Was feeling dry, needed some of that Zizek spitting truth
I love the point hidden in the very last sentece: "moving more to the left".
It used to be "lie and hide". Now it's "f*** me, you got me."
In my experience identity obsessed liberals also support every US/NATO “humanitarian” war and the efforts of the US and Europe to force liberal capitalism and social liberalism down the throat of every country in the world (or as in the case of, say, Saudi Arabia, they don’t care about repression because the west gets what they want from those countries). Compare to a place like Syria which is constantly punished for not allowing western capitalists to plunder it economically.
Western foreign policy is very much based on cultural and/or economic supremacy and, ironically, upper middle class identity liberals obsessed with “white supremacy” largely support it.
A question I often ask is why does the west (Greater Europe) think it has a right to dominate the entire world and dictate norms to other countries at gun point or with deadly economic “sanctions”? Should not countries be allowed to develop as they see fit, at their own pace without liberal capitalist imperialists breathing down their necks?
Take North Africa and the Middle East (Western Asia) where the UK, France and the USA have been meddling in a major way for well over a hundred years by supporting despots, starting wars, fomenting coups etc. How can these countries ever work out their problems and progress socially and politically with the US and its European vassals wreaking deadly havoc throughout the region?
Zizek and many on the left overlook present day imperialism completely.
Liberals spouse "humanitarian" interventionism. It's not a stretch to state that liberals and neoconservatives intersect in foreign policy.
Indeed. I cannot help but think about the protests in Lebanon now..
I see a lot of posters here who should be reading the world socialist website
www.wsws.org/
For a clear analysis of the right wing politcs of identity politcs this website hits the nail on the head.
Please, Africa gets enough aid, that in comparison---the Marshal plan could have rebuilt Europe 100 times. Failed cultures need excuses. Imperialism isn't why Africa didn't invent "texting" but Tiny Israel only 70 yrs old did.
Excuses excuses
The problem with present day imperialism is that it is controlled and run by progressives, they just run it out of the State Department with "aid"
When UA-cam's caption think he's speaking Italian 🤣🤣🤣
Isn't he? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Universal dimension.
But how will you achieve that equal universility of each identity and how will that look like on the face of this earth?! Any example or scenerio??
Never ever give this man cocaine.
Can someone explain me the concept of universality he’s talking about?
when you find out, could you tell me?
from context, i think he is saying "the only truly objective perspective". meaning a perspective that is *not* culturally derived, it sits outside of all culture judging like the Eye of God. but this is impossible, because nearly every knowledge system rests within some kind of culture, and science as it is practiced rests within Western Judeo Christian culture, so it has some of that same culture's inherent biases. and nearly ALL cultures have within them the bias that their own culture is correct, and other cultures are incorrect depending upon how they vary by certain beliefs, practices, etc from one's own.
don't know if that is correct, but farther than that i cannot go.
The universality refers to the Marxist proposition that liberation of the individual will only be achieved if everyone has the same access to rights/means. So instead of viewing yourself as an elitist self penalizing group (which actually maintains a power structure of who is the most ethically correct), you could work into how you could incorporate yourself and people from those unprivileged groups into the universality of equal rights and responsibilities.
To say that one side of the divide embraces identity politics more than the other is quite possibly the most ridiculous thing I have heard today. And I hear a lot of ridiculous things.