I've previously owned a series of different field watches including a Seiko Alpinist SARB017, the older 41mm Heritage Ranger, and a Rolex Explorer 36. The Sandhurst is such a wonderful daily wear (and such a good value). The others are gone; and I now have one Sandhurst on a strap, and one on a bracelet. When the time comes for service on the first, I'll have the sencond for use. Great review!
Where the ranger shines is in its bracelet and clasp, easily one of the best I've ever handled, and the main reason I want one. if i wanted a field watch on a strap instead of a bracelet its the christopher ward all day, way better value All in all I'm going for the ranger though, love the understated quality of it
Both nice, I prefer the looks of the Tudor. I do wish the Tudor had an exhibition case back. (I prefer that on any watch haha) Maybe field watches don't typically have that? Either way, good video!
Wow . Crazy lizard . Merry Christmas to you as well of course . Both would make me feel lucky to have but I definitely prefer the Tudor . I've always liked the Ranger and maybe someday will get one . I've recently purchased a Guinand Flight Engineer and it is a true masterpiece of a tool watch .
The Tudor feels rock solid and would be a great choice to add to a collection. On the used market the Ranger takes a big hit and can be had for about $2500 CANADIAN so about half the price of a new one.
![The most quality. British Military Fieldwatch. Christopher ward C65 Sandhurst reiview[Eng.subtitles]](/img/n.gif)
Thanks for the video. The Tudor carries its name. The CW carries its workmanship. The case alone on the CW wins that race. Cheers!!!
Totally agree! ❤❤❤😊
Thanks, brilliant video, I've got the Ranger,and I'm very impressed, however the Chris ward time piece looks awesome 🏴🇬🇧👍
The Ranger is very nice but the CW at 1/3 the price really gives Tudor a run for it’s money.
The movement of the Ranger is MT5402. It's a new Tudor movement and it's better than SW200-1.
I don’t think the Movement is better in the Tudor but being in house gives the brand as a whole strength , much like Oris and the Caliber 400
I don't know if it's better or not but you've mention it's the same. :D
@@ab9677 the older ranger did use the same movement but you are correct the new Ranger is in house MT5402
Still i like the look of the Sandhurst better. Also - have one. ;)
@@ab9677 The CW is very handsome for sure
Thanks for the video very helpful. Love the video content plus it’s Canadian. 👍🏻👍🏻 up . A member know!!!
Awesome! Thank you!
I've previously owned a series of different field watches including a Seiko Alpinist SARB017, the older 41mm Heritage Ranger, and a Rolex Explorer 36. The Sandhurst is such a wonderful daily wear (and such a good value). The others are gone; and I now have one Sandhurst on a strap, and one on a bracelet. When the time comes for service on the first, I'll have the sencond for use. Great review!
Thanks and totally agree the Sandhurst is a fantastic watch
Where the ranger shines is in its bracelet and clasp, easily one of the best I've ever handled, and the main reason I want one. if i wanted a field watch on a strap instead of a bracelet its the christopher ward all day, way better value
All in all I'm going for the ranger though, love the understated quality of it
I've got a Ranger, i love it 👍
Both nice, I prefer the looks of the Tudor. I do wish the Tudor had an exhibition case back. (I prefer that on any watch haha) Maybe field watches don't typically have that? Either way, good video!
Wow . Crazy lizard . Merry Christmas to you as well of course . Both would make me feel lucky to have but I definitely prefer the Tudor . I've always liked the Ranger and maybe someday will get one . I've recently purchased a Guinand Flight Engineer and it is a true masterpiece of a tool watch .
The Tudor feels rock solid and would be a great choice to add to a collection. On the used market the Ranger takes a big hit and can be had for about $2500 CANADIAN so about half the price of a new one.
For sale Tudor Ranger $SOLD Canadian!!!! 😊 If anyone is interested in contact me here