@@markjordan7705😂😆🤣😅😂😆🤣😅😂😆🤣😅😂😆🤣😅 You don't give a $h!t about your cr@p job either, numbnutts!!???? 😱🤦🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️ Come on snowflake, don't type out of your ring-piece, ffs!
@@budgetnuclearweapons7858 Trespass on public property of this nature cannot be enforced against a peaceful person. Trespass only applies to this sort of public property (not like a military base or power plant or such) if the person is disturbing the peace or preventing the government from carrying on business with the public. There is no law that can be cited otherwise and that woman couldn't even cite the trespass statute.
@@unbreakable7633 You've been watching too many audits and believed everything the auditors have said. You really shouldn't you know. Whether its council, government or private property, trespass law can be applied. Being "peaceful" ...or not has nothing to do with the offence of trespass. It doesn't fail to be trespass for people who keep quiet you know. "The public" don't own property like they do in the USA. 'Public property' as such doesn't really exist here in Blighty, its just a figure of speech with no legal merit. Auditors can often be heard saying "its owned by the public"...- no it isn't. You can't cite a statute for it..... its common law. If you really want to reference it though, - Halsburys Law of England vol 45 paragraph 1400.
G4Stupid have really raised their standards on who they employ. Brilliant personnel, proper knuckle draggers more like. I blame the employers for putting them in this position i bet these lot excelled at the psychometric tests. Well done for standing your ground as much as you did but be more assertive with you voice and body language mate, it goes a long way. Watch how the two at the end switch their cameras on after the assault you NEED to take this further with people like that they will do it again!
@Life Force Energy - Selenite bit confused on your answer? Please elaborate on how its designed that way? I give a big question and such a small answer
I've seen many of these audits where the security has been worse than this. They hardly ever do take it further. No point shouting you're gonna lose your job when they aren't.
If they overstep the mark, it is no longer reasonable. If they overstep the mark you can defend yourself. If you're asked to leave, and refuse, they are permitted to use reasonable (and proportionate) force to remove you. If you resist, you are committing the offence, not them.
You should report those thugs for assault and battery. They need to be sacked ASAP. If I was there, I would have used reasonable force to protect myself, if you know what I mean.
_"You should report those thugs for assault and battery"_ There's no point, the police won't do anything (they will always side with security - against the public), G4S don't give a flying s__t (try reporting the security via their complaints procedure - called 'integritycounts' - and you'll find out), the JobCentre won't do anything and SIA - like G4S - turn a blind eye to breaches of their policy . . . . it's pointless, about the only thing you can do is put these thugs on UA-cam.
Forget reporting them. Forget telling the police. Go see a solicitor and straight to civil action. A massive pay out will embarrass G4S and they will sack the thugs.
Ooooohhhh teeth missing, tattoos on thr neck, gold rings, gold bracelet, bling watch, G4S embroidered on the polo shirt.......guarding the dole office. He has all the qualities of running his own waltzer at Blackpool Pleasure Beach
State of those animals; how can these people be seriously employed to operate in a job centre? Well done for standing your ground in the face of some really nasty bastards. 👍👊
tattoos all over their arms, broken teeth and dirty shirts ! What a disgrace to call them " security " , its like calling the Waffen SS social workers !
Think you need to send the video link directly to SIA for them to take a look at. Maybe SIA could use this as a training video on how NOT to act with a member of the public.
@@DavidPatersonPortraits They we’re asked under a FOI , but in the response they said as this information was for the ‘safety’ of DWP staff , the document is ‘exempt’ from the act , and they refused to provide it 😮
To the careers officer. "I'm a brain dead moron who loves being on a power trip, what do you recommend". Careers officer replies, "Oh, security is definitely the way to go for you". I'll give G4S a call and arrange an interview".
Or how about this; I'm a brain dead benefits scrounger who likes going around and winding people up with my camera". Career officer says " why don't you join the other brain dead scroungers and create a UA-cam channel, go and intimidate people and then claim it's your job?". Wey eye, that sounds canny!!
These audit videos reveal so much about our culture... That we love telling people what to do when we enjoy the power trip. It goes for all of us, irrespective of the station.
4:45 In self defence situations you can hit or touch first if you fear that the other person will use violence. And the guy waving his hand close to your face can give any reasonable person the fear that his hand will be used to hit them.
3:15 She says her colleague is using reasonable force. Under common law he is not allowed to use any force except to protect a person or property from harm. So she failed her training. As did the male.
As someone with an SIA License and has went through the PI training, reasonable force has to be reasonable, necessary and proportionate to the threat faced. As you were not aggressive and did not pose an immediate threat to the security, it was unreasonable for them to get aggressive.
Well sir you should hand your SIA license back to the dossers at the SIA because in his situation he was asked numerous times to leave and he even stated he wouldn't leave so it was reasonable, necessary and proportionate to go hands on as he was trespassing. Nobody has to be aggressive for them to be physically removed. And you have a security license? Just goes to show you don't know sh*t about dealing with trespassing. What a tool I definitely wouldn't want you on my team as going by your reply you'd bottle it and hide in the toilets while it kicks off, I've worked with plenty of fakes like that and they always get exposed as you sound like one of em
@@tomalex4806 I appreciate your perspective, but I believe there are alternative approaches to dealing with situations like the one described. In today's society, it is widely recognized that resorting to physical means should only be considered when all other options have been exhausted and the situation has escalated to a level that necessitates such measures. In this particular case, it appears that the individual in question was initially open to dialogue and was not overtly hostile. In such circumstances, it is crucial to prioritize de-escalation techniques and attempt to resolve the issue through non-violent means. By employing effective communication and understanding psychology and human behavior, security professionals can often achieve satisfactory outcomes without resorting to physical force. The existence of organizations like the Security Industry Authority (SIA) demonstrates the importance of incorporating psychological insights into security practices. Their purpose is to educate and equip security personnel with the knowledge and skills necessary to handle situations effectively, ensuring the safety of all parties involved. Based on your response, it seems that you may hold a different viewpoint on the matter. I would be interested in hearing more about your perspective and the reasoning behind it. Engaging in an open and respectful discussion can lead to a better understanding of various approaches to security and customer service.
@@JamieLeeMedia yes the law does but DWP gave a statement saying that G4S are not allowed to remove them from jobcenters for having a camera . Hence me stating what I did .
That'll be him getting sacked. Also sue g4s you'll get compo. There's no rules to stop you recording and it's your right to do so. G4S staff had no right to remove you, you were not trespassing. Sue them for discrimination .
7:00 Locking an exit whilst people are in the building brakes H&S laws. If there is a fire people will get trapped. And how likely will the person with the key be still around.
Horrifying behaviour. I recall seeing a video from "Power to the proletariat" where the Job Centre staff followed him home and began punching/kicking him in the street. I really do fear for people's safety.
No, it's not criminal whatsoever. He was asked to leave god knows how many times. He didn't. They've got every right to tell him to leave. Who wants to be recorded in a job centre??!! Speak sense you Muppets!! He was warned and warned about reasonable force. And they used it. Then he cries WOW!! Then he goes around the back, which clearly is not public. Again they told him to go. He didn't. They used reasonable force. Those G4S guys pissed all over him. That's why he ended up getting personal with them. Can't he think of anything else to say apart from "say goodbye to your jobs". At least they work and contribute to society instead of living on benefits like this turnip.
@@EyeSpyAudit I don't care what their policy states. If I went into a job centre for benefits or to look for a job I would NOT want to be recorded by some random idiot with a camera, putting me on UA-cam when I don't want to be. You auditors work by one rule; it's not illegal to record in public. But what about respect and decency for your fellow humans? They ask you not to record them and put them on UA-cam, and you do it because you can!! You've no respect for people. You are all bending the law to suit your stupid games. And believe me, the law will be changed because you lot are causing havoc. So recording in public soon won't be as easy which affects normal people. Get a job. Get a life!!
@@andyscullion lol 'not criminal whatsoever, they've got every right to tell him to leave'... you missed the part where they grabbed him, pushed him, shoved him...?
5:30 She says they can use reasonable force. No they can't. They can only use force when it's appropriate and necessary and then has to be reasonable. Shoving a peaceful quiet person is not reasonable force. They commuted the crime of assault and battery. The police won't do anything but the security people can still be sued or have a private criial prosecution set against them.
I've seen this tactic used on several auditors by security and it appears to be very effective. Security shouldn't have mentioned calling the police as this added another procrastination to moving the auditor on.
Was hoping to see the police interaction to possibly verify if you were in the right or wrong, I don’t know the building and I don’t know what’s private. I assume most people here watch the veitch and I would assume the best bet is to leave the building peacefully and wait for a “higher authority” to give a conclusion
Bit of a difference though, isn't it? They don't have access to the footage they record. They download it onto a company database at the end of each shift. And it is then kept for numerous years in case they need to investigate something from that date. Some blurt doesn't go home and put it all over UA-cam. In fact it's not a bit different, it's a massive difference.
2:55 The intelligence level of someone who puts their hand up to hide their face from the camera AFTER they know its already been recorded is zero or even below zero. Putting their hand up does not automajically delete the video.
I may well go and covertly record my visits to job centres and announce what I just did before leaving. I probably wont because I don't need to visit such places. I wonder if covertly recording is ok though?
When you were pushed you should have either defended yourself or fallen to the ground, called for an ambulance, then reported to solicitor, police, DWP, SIA, UA-cam and Tik Tok. Mass audit would be fun to see how they react to more than one person recording. Good job 🙂👍
I keep coming back to the same question ! Why do G4S have 5 security staff in a JCP , when there is not even a single customer there ! They are all paid for by the Public Tax payers !
Because the job centre staff do such a good job of encouraging people often at their lowest point possibly having lost a job they've had for decades get back into work. They need more security than a bank! Just in case people want to hug them to much for all their excellent assistance.
@@EyeSpyAudit They are clearly at the thug end of the security profession but what I saw was you being physically removed after repeated warnings to leave.Plod won’t be interested & G4S will probably promote them.
Keep up the good work and it just shows her the type of Thugs there employing I would just put my head around the door when I see him like that I would walk away and make a complaint not that it get you anywhere Get It On film and just running to court and Sue the ass off them and maybe there keep their hands to themselves and keep their big mouth shut bloody troublemakers
The individuals captured in the footage are a danger to the public and to themselves, complaints should be lodged to their employer and their contracts should be terminated, criminal investigation should commence, and they should be referred to a psychiatrist who would urgently address their poor mental health, extreme and severe hormone imbalances, aggressive behaviour and complex psychiatric disorders.
I'm 63 years old and I learned a long time ago. People who work in job centers have a very strange attitude. Notice how I don't use any words that can get me arrested but you know what I mean. They employ people in wheelchairs with severe disabilities trying to make you feel guilty, the severely disabled people would get more money if they didn't work in the job center, but I guess that's just how it works
G4S Dismissed & Educated ua-cam.com/video/obGqmS2Bkcg/v-deo.html
o m g
I would have removed you
@@markjordan7705😂😆🤣😅😂😆🤣😅😂😆🤣😅😂😆🤣😅
You don't give a $h!t about your cr@p job either, numbnutts!!???? 😱🤦🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
Come on snowflake, don't type out of your ring-piece, ffs!
When somebody says "It's against the law" and can't cite the law, you know there is no law.
It's their policy. But "the law" allows them to enforce it.
It's trespass law.
@@budgetnuclearweapons7858 lol, too phunny
@@budgetnuclearweapons7858 Trespass on public property of this nature cannot be enforced against a peaceful person. Trespass only applies to this sort of public property (not like a military base or power plant or such) if the person is disturbing the peace or preventing the government from carrying on business with the public. There is no law that can be cited otherwise and that woman couldn't even cite the trespass statute.
Is being a scumbag the only qualification you to get a job .
@@unbreakable7633 You've been watching too many audits and believed everything the auditors have said. You really shouldn't you know.
Whether its council, government or private property, trespass law can be applied. Being "peaceful" ...or not has nothing to do with the offence of trespass. It doesn't fail to be trespass for people who keep quiet you know.
"The public" don't own property like they do in the USA. 'Public property' as such doesn't really exist here in Blighty, its just a figure of speech with no legal merit. Auditors can often be heard saying "its owned by the public"...- no it isn't.
You can't cite a statute for it..... its common law.
If you really want to reference it though, - Halsburys Law of England vol 45 paragraph 1400.
By the looks of it we need security guards for the security guards
But who will guard the guard's guards?
and then security guards for the security guards of the other security guards for the security guards and ... 😂
Would there be enough ego-entitling uniforms to go around?
They think they are night club bouncers! Everyone ring and complain plus mass audit required ASAP!
Club door men are better trained
@@arry4264yeah right
its the same training assuming they have a DS badge and not SG which majority do have
I’ll never understand why there are so many thugs from g4s in these places. They don’t even have this much security in banks. Madness.
Its because of the non stop Auditors all following the other auditor Sheep coming in causing trouble.
@@pegadethband do you know of any other auditor who has been to Mbro Job centre , then ?
@@pegadethband wet wipe
@@pegadethband Good thing you can type and lick boots at the same time.
The money gravy Train funded by the working tax man straight in to the hands of the private companies
More security than people looking for jobs.
G4Stupid have really raised their standards on who they employ. Brilliant personnel, proper knuckle draggers more like. I blame the employers for putting them in this position i bet these lot excelled at the psychometric tests. Well done for standing your ground as much as you did but be more assertive with you voice and body language mate, it goes a long way. Watch how the two at the end switch their cameras on after the assault you NEED to take this further with people like that they will do it again!
@Life Force Energy - Selenite bit confused on your answer? Please elaborate on how its designed that way? I give a big question and such a small answer
Needs a mass audit
Send Yardley Ski and laughing Auditor
You gonna lead it or are you just another pathetic keyboard warrior?
Absolutely
Shut up if it's not a woman no ones interested, Just look at Griffiths scrap yard
@@hectichazerdus What about the G.O.A.T. AB? PTTP and PJ would be good choices too.
UPDATE - I've been advised they no longer work at that site.
What’s the response?
Make sure you nail those dirty aggressive little rats!
They must be sacked.
If not then you must take legal action against the thugs & G4S. That's even more compensation
Catch them all on their own they won't be so brave then.
@@Prostinger93 probably "we are looking into this". And then nothing.
Aww someone's definitely overcompensating for something! Poor security must have a chipolata hahaha
Chipolata, that made me laugh🤣
@@TheBrawlBox 🤣🤣🤣
Hope you took this further love to hear the outcome
I've seen many of these audits where the security has been worse than this. They hardly ever do take it further. No point shouting you're gonna lose your job when they aren't.
Yea mate this is why I never subscribe they don’t care they want this reaction for views they never do what’s right and take action
It is being taken further
@@justtango4741 they are not allowed to go hands on full stop, its a sackable offence
@@EyeSpyAuditget a job u lowlife
"Reasonable Force" Hmm, what constitutes reasonable force though, and can you use reasonable force in return if they overstep the mark.
I think reasonable force in Middlesborough includes attacking with a machine gun.
Yes you can
If they overstep the mark, it is no longer reasonable. If they overstep the mark you can defend yourself.
If you're asked to leave, and refuse, they are permitted to use reasonable (and proportionate) force to remove you.
If you resist, you are committing the offence, not them.
Usually reasonable force can be used, but not in this case
@@scotttchviski6706 bang on!! Well said!!
You should report those thugs for assault and battery. They need to be sacked ASAP. If I was there, I would have used reasonable force to protect myself, if you know what I mean.
_"You should report those thugs for assault and battery"_
There's no point, the police won't do anything (they will always side with security - against the public), G4S don't give a flying s__t (try reporting the security via their complaints procedure - called 'integritycounts' - and you'll find out), the JobCentre won't do anything and SIA - like G4S - turn a blind eye to breaches of their policy . . . . it's pointless, about the only thing you can do is put these thugs on UA-cam.
And spent 8 hours in the cells for your trouble.
Aye ok dave.
If that’s you in the pic mate ye would of got ye jaw snapped in half
Complaint has been raised and G4S Legal Team have responded.
These Tyrants 👢 are a Danger to the public.
Forget reporting them. Forget telling the police. Go see a solicitor and straight to civil action. A massive pay out will embarrass G4S and they will sack the thugs.
More auditors here please , they needs repeated visits until they learn .
Learn what?
@@s3ra9h1mthey're not above the law, numbnutts... 🤦🏻♂️🤷🏻♂️
public buildings where all the lights are on and nobody is at home!
Just for filming 🙄 what a bunch of thugs
And pushed whilst on public property
Ooooohhhh teeth missing, tattoos on thr neck, gold rings, gold bracelet, bling watch, G4S embroidered on the polo shirt.......guarding the dole office.
He has all the qualities of running his own waltzer at Blackpool Pleasure Beach
You missed the dandruff on his T-shirt 😂😂😂
State of those animals; how can these people be seriously employed to operate in a job centre? Well done for standing your ground in the face of some really nasty bastards. 👍👊
tattoos all over their arms, broken teeth and dirty shirts ! What a disgrace to call them " security " , its like calling the Waffen SS social workers !
Neck tattoo bully is just a fat lump of lard with skinny arms.
On first sighting, the hideous G4Stupid thugs it would instantly deter people from entering the job centre or any premises that the grubs are located.
Because who wants to work as security in a job centre? This is probably the best that apply! :)
YOU are the slave, hence you are the problem. Not them.
Get every auditor round to this place at the same time.
Think you need to send the video link directly to SIA for them to take a look at. Maybe SIA could use this as a training video on how NOT to act with a member of the public.
Mass audit required.
Do you need to be thick first, in order to apply for work with G4S ?
It must help.
@@andrewmcgonagle6290 🤣👍👍
The DWP have issued guidance that clearly allows photography in job centres. PRINT IT and carry it with you.
They can't read so no point they make up laws and rules as they go along.
Got a link to this guidance, I'd like to read it.
It's all in pictures no links
@@DavidPatersonPortraits They we’re asked under a FOI , but in the response they said as this information was for the ‘safety’ of DWP staff , the document is ‘exempt’ from the act , and they refused to provide it 😮
To the careers officer. "I'm a brain dead moron who loves being on a power trip, what do you recommend". Careers officer replies, "Oh, security is definitely the way to go for you". I'll give G4S a call and arrange an interview".
Or how about this; I'm a brain dead benefits scrounger who likes going around and winding people up with my camera". Career officer says " why don't you join the other brain dead scroungers and create a UA-cam channel, go and intimidate people and then claim it's your job?". Wey eye, that sounds canny!!
These audit videos reveal so much about our culture... That we love telling people what to do when we enjoy the power trip. It goes for all of us, irrespective of the station.
Great Audit. This is the kind that really makes a change. Jobs will be lost and heads will roll. Well done ESA.
G4S already know 👍
You have got to sue - no reason for that level of violence.
I hope you take this further! Waiting for up date
he must be really hard with all those tattoos
A bit like lying soft shite ryan and frauditing WICKES Yorkshire
Exactly...vile thugs. What a mess they look.
Must be really hard with a camera also
G4S is a universal acronym for “Goons For Security”
Holy shit them clowns are crazy pal. Fairplay 2you for not backing down and also hope ur OK 👍❤️
Not backing down don't talk bullshit
Your the bomb, oops bad word to use 😂😂
@@niciolamyelwee6646 😂😂class Ty funny soo it issss 😉❤️
Why is there 6 useless security guards in an empty office?
Because there too thick to get a job that needs brains
G4S recruiting the cream of the Security industry again
4:45 In self defence situations you can hit or touch first if you fear that the other person will use violence. And the guy waving his hand close to your face can give any reasonable person the fear that his hand will be used to hit them.
3:15 She says her colleague is using reasonable force. Under common law he is not allowed to use any force except to protect a person or property from harm. So she failed her training. As did the male.
Wtf 😮I feel obligated too email g4 s and complain 🤬
As someone with an SIA License and has went through the PI training, reasonable force has to be reasonable, necessary and proportionate to the threat faced. As you were not aggressive and did not pose an immediate threat to the security, it was unreasonable for them to get aggressive.
Well sir you should hand your SIA license back to the dossers at the SIA because in his situation he was asked numerous times to leave and he even stated he wouldn't leave so it was reasonable, necessary and proportionate to go hands on as he was trespassing.
Nobody has to be aggressive for them to be physically removed.
And you have a security license? Just goes to show you don't know sh*t about dealing with trespassing.
What a tool
I definitely wouldn't want you on my team as going by your reply you'd bottle it and hide in the toilets while it kicks off, I've worked with plenty of fakes like that and they always get exposed as you sound like one of em
@@tomalex4806 I appreciate your perspective, but I believe there are alternative approaches to dealing with situations like the one described. In today's society, it is widely recognized that resorting to physical means should only be considered when all other options have been exhausted and the situation has escalated to a level that necessitates such measures.
In this particular case, it appears that the individual in question was initially open to dialogue and was not overtly hostile. In such circumstances, it is crucial to prioritize de-escalation techniques and attempt to resolve the issue through non-violent means. By employing effective communication and understanding psychology and human behavior, security professionals can often achieve satisfactory outcomes without resorting to physical force.
The existence of organizations like the Security Industry Authority (SIA) demonstrates the importance of incorporating psychological insights into security practices. Their purpose is to educate and equip security personnel with the knowledge and skills necessary to handle situations effectively, ensuring the safety of all parties involved.
Based on your response, it seems that you may hold a different viewpoint on the matter. I would be interested in hearing more about your perspective and the reasoning behind it. Engaging in an open and respectful discussion can lead to a better understanding of various approaches to security and customer service.
The DWP needs to send senior undercover employees to make unannounced visits to examine how DWP offices are performing please
DWP says your allowed in the public areas of a job Center with a camera ?
No the law does...
@@JamieLeeMedia yes the law does but DWP gave a statement saying that G4S are not allowed to remove them from jobcenters for having a camera . Hence me stating what I did .
@@kylewilliams6091 no worries wasn't sure what angle you were going for! Thought it was against eyespy ha
@@JamieLeeMedia no not against him just mentioning that even the dwp policy is in his favour .
@@kylewilliams6091 places like that need to be taught about sec 33 of the CJA 1972!
The 2 security G4S muppets will have to keep looking over their shoulders when they leave work.🤣🤣
Please tell me your going to take this further. And let us know what happends thankyou👍
Take it further? How?
Complaint has been raised and G4S Legal Team have responded.
@@beds139civil prosecution
That'll be him getting sacked. Also sue g4s you'll get compo. There's no rules to stop you recording and it's your right to do so. G4S staff had no right to remove you, you were not trespassing. Sue them for discrimination .
7:00 Locking an exit whilst people are in the building brakes H&S laws. If there is a fire people will get trapped. And how likely will the person with the key be still around.
2:36 - His face.. the eye rolling. Absolute tool.
Really didn't expect the outcome of this! Damn! Hope you're good man
Horrifying behaviour. I recall seeing a video from "Power to the proletariat" where the Job Centre staff followed him home and began punching/kicking him in the street.
I really do fear for people's safety.
The "on Moi MANNOR" guy...
They can say goodbye buy to their jobs
And hello to the benefit system 😂😂😂😂
Yeah, and they'll see this blurt there too!! 🤔
AUDITORS GET TO THIS JOB CENTRE NOW.
Sure I’ve seen him on Jeremy Kyle, the teeth look familiar 😂
Keep us informed on the consequences for these idiots. This is way over the line, potentially criminal.
it is criminal! what they did constitutes serious assault and harassment.
No, it's not criminal whatsoever. He was asked to leave god knows how many times. He didn't. They've got every right to tell him to leave. Who wants to be recorded in a job centre??!! Speak sense you Muppets!! He was warned and warned about reasonable force. And they used it. Then he cries WOW!! Then he goes around the back, which clearly is not public. Again they told him to go. He didn't. They used reasonable force. Those G4S guys pissed all over him. That's why he ended up getting personal with them. Can't he think of anything else to say apart from "say goodbye to your jobs". At least they work and contribute to society instead of living on benefits like this turnip.
G4S Policy states they can't use any force unless in self defence
@@EyeSpyAudit I don't care what their policy states. If I went into a job centre for benefits or to look for a job I would NOT want to be recorded by some random idiot with a camera, putting me on UA-cam when I don't want to be. You auditors work by one rule; it's not illegal to record in public. But what about respect and decency for your fellow humans? They ask you not to record them and put them on UA-cam, and you do it because you can!! You've no respect for people. You are all bending the law to suit your stupid games. And believe me, the law will be changed because you lot are causing havoc. So recording in public soon won't be as easy which affects normal people. Get a job. Get a life!!
@@andyscullion lol 'not criminal whatsoever, they've got every right to tell him to leave'... you missed the part where they grabbed him, pushed him, shoved him...?
5:30 She says they can use reasonable force. No they can't. They can only use force when it's appropriate and necessary and then has to be reasonable. Shoving a peaceful quiet person is not reasonable force. They commuted the crime of assault and battery. The police won't do anything but the security people can still be sued or have a private criial prosecution set against them.
On his property! This place needs mass audit on the regular.
It's amazing how aggressive they are. All teessiders are like this.
G4S: you're not allowed to record in public property (turns his body worn on)
Viewer: 😳
Job centres are an auditing gold mine
Security? what real scumbags!!
He's out of a job. G4S has a very strict "No hands on" policy. 3 at DWP offices in Scotland have been sacked in the past year for putting hands on.
Why can't you film in there? He is!
DWP allow filming in public areas of the job centre seen that in other auditing videos
So Happy Auditing Britain brought this video to the fore again. Just AWFUL & UNLAWFUL!
Thanks Lorrie 👍 plenty of videos for you to catch up on 👍🍿
Mr Toothless behaviour have just marked this place as Auditors paradise
Fuking security acting tough 😂 on road he's a pure melt....... Great video lad 👍
Now we know where the Brinks Mat gold went. 😄
Isnt there a memo thats allows video in the public areas
I've seen this tactic used on several auditors by security and it appears to be very effective. Security shouldn't have mentioned calling the police as this added another procrastination to moving the auditor on.
Think PTTP needs to teach these a lesson or two me thinks
Was hoping to see the police interaction to possibly verify if you were in the right or wrong, I don’t know the building and I don’t know what’s private. I assume most people here watch the veitch and I would assume the best bet is to leave the building peacefully and wait for a “higher authority” to give a conclusion
this place needs a mass audit
WHY SO MANY NUMPTIES HOW DO YOU SCAN QR CODE CHECK FOR RULES SWEARING AT PUBLIC ALL AUDITORS TO ATTEND THESE BULLYS
You can't record me but I can record you!! FFS 😂G4S never learn
🤦♂️🤦♂️
Bit of a difference though, isn't it? They don't have access to the footage they record. They download it onto a company database at the end of each shift. And it is then kept for numerous years in case they need to investigate something from that date. Some blurt doesn't go home and put it all over UA-cam. In fact it's not a bit different, it's a massive difference.
2:55 The intelligence level of someone who puts their hand up to hide their face from the camera AFTER they know its already been recorded is zero or even below zero. Putting their hand up does not automajically delete the video.
Also it's still recording his voice and his words can be used against him in court.
I may well go and covertly record my visits to job centres and announce what I just did before leaving. I probably wont because I don't need to visit such places. I wonder if covertly recording is ok though?
Absolutely
When you were pushed you should have either defended yourself or fallen to the ground, called for an ambulance, then reported to solicitor, police, DWP, SIA, UA-cam and Tik Tok. Mass audit would be fun to see how they react to more than one person recording. Good job 🙂👍
I keep coming back to the same question ! Why do G4S have 5 security staff in a JCP , when there is not even a single customer there ! They are all paid for by the Public Tax payers !
Because the job centre staff do such a good job of encouraging people often at their lowest point possibly having lost a job they've had for decades get back into work. They need more security than a bank! Just in case people want to hug them to much for all their excellent assistance.
Facial tattoos and thuggery, I’m shocked!
THEY LOOK LIKE CRIMINALS WANNAPE COPS
Just found you!!! Good work
Big up 👍👌
You deserve a million subs for this. How disgusting this company is YET AGAIN. You did fantastic
Thanks Moreece 👍, plenty of videos for you to catch up on 👌💪
You need to get a job mate. You were wrong about the £20 coin as proven.
Power to The Proletariat would have a field day with this job centre!
He'd of been lobbed out the same way he was,just probably quicker
I assume you are going to make a formal complaint? If you don't then what's the point of your videos?
Absolutely 👍
@@EyeSpyAudit They are clearly at the thug end of the security profession but what I saw was you being physically removed after repeated warnings to leave.Plod won’t be interested & G4S will probably promote them.
That guys has been watching to much of the A Team , He believes he is Mr T .
I honest though G4S was band on Britain Got Talent
That was JLS 😆👍
Hope he feels the full force of Universal Credit
The aggression is disgusting, it's like they were getting enjoyment out of it !!
They 100% were... perverse moron scumbags
Basically thugs
Keep up the good work and it just shows her the type of Thugs there employing I would just put my head around the door when I see him like that I would walk away and make a complaint not that it get you anywhere Get It On film and just running to court and Sue the ass off them and maybe there keep their hands to themselves and keep their big mouth shut bloody troublemakers
What are those thugs part time nightclubs bouncers
The individuals captured in the footage are a danger to the public and to themselves, complaints should be lodged to their employer and their contracts should be terminated, criminal investigation should commence, and they should be referred to a psychiatrist who would urgently address their poor mental health, extreme and severe hormone imbalances, aggressive behaviour and complex psychiatric disorders.
For doing their jobs? Harsh!! I'd be more inclined to suggest help for the numpty with his zoom camera!!
G4s employing bottom feeders of the highest calibre,
PTTP,you gotta get down there!
And see the facilities manager REMEMBER HELP HELP HELP NFA SELF DEFENSE 🤣🤣🤣
Needs Marti Blagborough to visit with his group ...
You should have phoned the police, that was assault and battery, sue the hell out of g4s, if not don't do any audits ever again.
📹🎥📽📷📸🚔🚓🏴👀 G4S should not have the contract if you treat the public like this
Acting tough now because he's giving you a few teeth and you didn't retaliate acting hard typical of bullies I can't stand bullies
I'm 63 years old and I learned a long time ago. People who work in job centers have a very strange attitude. Notice how I don't use any words that can get me arrested but you know what I mean. They employ people in wheelchairs with severe disabilities trying to make you feel guilty, the severely disabled people would get more money if they didn't work in the job center, but I guess that's just how it works
These cameras are scary.
Greetings from South Africa.
Love your videos and your acent 😇
Andre 👍❤️
I’d be well scared if I was their partner! 😳
Absolute THUGS..... THIS IS WHY WE RECORD 💯👍
What you expect from people getting paid 9/h with criminal records