Genius at work ! People non familiar with the topic probably don’t realise they are attending the conference of a true genius who was the first physician to resolve by experience the long conflict between Einstein and Bohr . Make no mistake , behind a presentation tailored to be understood by all , this man is a living legend . The fact that this video has 2.5 k views makes me sad 😞
To understand all of the mathematical formalisms used in this talk, watch the following: For understanding QM interpretation of polarized light: ua-cam.com/video/pBh7Xqbh5JQ/v-deo.html and then ua-cam.com/video/zNMzUf5GZsQ/v-deo.html For clarification of Bell's inequalities (from beginning to 46:30) and the CHSH inequalities (starts at min 46:30) for here: ua-cam.com/video/6p2jjLB4GNA/v-deo.html .
Einstein no estaba de acuerdo con el entrelazamiento. En el experimento Michelson & M. La luz (fotones) provenían de un solo foco ¿pueden entonces estar entrelazados y no fué posible determinar su velocidad dando siempre el mismo resultado? ¡El postulado de Einstein marcha!
I don't like "entanglement" - but I do accept that reality is non-local, and if so, then time is NOT quantised to give a limit of C0. Time can be zero and hence dist/time = infinite velocity, and thus instantaneous connection. Entanglement? what is entangled? Its soul? Velocity is macro world concept which has nothing to do with the microworld.
I guess the issue is that you are trying to explain or visualise the quantum physic with traditional representation or visualisation which cannot happen . This is why quantum physic is hard to apprehend.
Genius at work ! People non familiar with the topic probably don’t realise they are attending the conference of a true genius who was the first physician to resolve by experience the long conflict between Einstein and Bohr . Make no mistake , behind a presentation tailored to be understood by all , this man is a living legend . The fact that this video has 2.5 k views makes me sad 😞
19:20 in the slide no 2) the second point it should be the measurement along y yields -1
Missed any mention of DeBroglie or Bohm.
To understand all of the mathematical formalisms used in this talk, watch the following:
For understanding QM interpretation of polarized light: ua-cam.com/video/pBh7Xqbh5JQ/v-deo.html and then ua-cam.com/video/zNMzUf5GZsQ/v-deo.html
For clarification of Bell's inequalities (from beginning to 46:30) and the CHSH inequalities (starts at min 46:30) for here: ua-cam.com/video/6p2jjLB4GNA/v-deo.html .
Enjoyed this lecture!
I love youtube❤❤ now i can sit at my home and watch a lecture from a Nobel Prize Winner😎😎how cool is that
Einstein no estaba de acuerdo con el entrelazamiento. En el experimento Michelson & M. La luz (fotones) provenían de un solo foco ¿pueden entonces estar entrelazados y no fué posible determinar su velocidad dando siempre el mismo resultado? ¡El postulado de Einstein marcha!
I don't like "entanglement" - but I do accept that reality is non-local, and if so, then time is NOT quantised to give a limit of C0. Time can be zero and hence dist/time = infinite velocity, and thus instantaneous connection. Entanglement? what is entangled? Its soul? Velocity is macro world concept which has nothing to do with the microworld.
I guess the issue is that you are trying to explain or visualise the quantum physic with traditional representation or visualisation which cannot happen . This is why quantum physic is hard to apprehend.
I visited once. There’s a point to it
1:01:12