No Focusing Needed - No Auto Focus, No Problem! How To Shoot Vintage Manual Lenses!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @ChrisBrogan
    @ChrisBrogan 20 днів тому +1

    The sandwich makes it even better! :) I had NO idea how to do what you just demonstrated, so that's really cool. I use manual lenses more than automatic, so this is VERY helpful to me, especially like you said in the intro, for street. I am REALLY lucky I had lunch right before you ended with that sandwich, though. :) Merry Christmas.

    • @MeatwhistlePhotos
      @MeatwhistlePhotos  20 днів тому +1

      Haha, that is awesome, Chris! I'm glad you enjoyed it. Merry Christmas to you and yours 🍻🍷🎄🔥

  • @zed91
    @zed91 21 день тому +7

    Rather than cranking the lens out to infinity, set the focus to the hyperfocal distance at a suitably small aperture for best results.

    • @MeatwhistlePhotos
      @MeatwhistlePhotos  21 день тому +1

      I crank it. 🤠

    • @maxhammick948
      @maxhammick948 20 днів тому +2

      Yeah, the bottle at 2ft was noticeably out of focus (3:20) - the DoF calculator was calling for the lens to be focussed at 5.8ft. It'll probably look sharp on colour film, but good B&W film will show that softness. Indoors cranking the focus to infinity isn't ideal, however for outdoor landscapes (without anything closer than ~10ft) focussing at infinity is good enough

  • @bwcok7947
    @bwcok7947 21 день тому +2

    Can you have the picture of your alcohol bottles set the same but somehow capture the fire flame in the background so it is not blurry since it is moving and the foreground is not.

    • @MeatwhistlePhotos
      @MeatwhistlePhotos  21 день тому

      Hi BW! You sure can. That photo was a long exposure. I believe it was 1 second long. If I bumped the ISO up, I could have stopped the flames in its tracks

  • @mirceagavan7046
    @mirceagavan7046 19 днів тому +1

    DOF example was very eazy to understand but how about setting up the dof starting at an arm lenght or less to the bottle! 😎

  • @alexshabotenko7228
    @alexshabotenko7228 19 днів тому

    I expected more, honestly. The method you described... sure, it can be used. Sometimes. In certain situations, when you can roughly know what your next shot will be. Like, if you are out in the woods, it will be some kind of a landscape, not a fast-moving street interaction.
    In short, this method is okay when you have a reasonable amount of time to get ready, and almost totally useless when you need to react fast (street, for example)

    • @zipWith
      @zipWith 19 днів тому +1

      Quite the opposite: you don't want to be messing around with focal length when you're trying to snap street shots. Maybe you don't go to F/22, but set yourself up to F/8 so you can capture more movement, get your depth of field where you want it, wind your film and then all you need to do is point-and-shoot.

    • @MeatwhistlePhotos
      @MeatwhistlePhotos  19 днів тому

      Exactly! It's as fast as it can be. F11, 1600 ISO, done deal. Street all day long

    • @MeatwhistlePhotos
      @MeatwhistlePhotos  19 днів тому

      It's the only setup for the street. F11, 1600 ISO, "Crank" to infity before you leave the house. Done dea, setup complete 👍🤠l

  • @jasongold6751
    @jasongold6751 20 днів тому +4

    Please stop saying that wide angles have greater depth of field. Use Apparent! If one blows image up to match longer lens, your depth of field shrinks...ALL lenses have same depth of field at same aperture. Optical law.