This should be a nice location to add to my must visit bucket list, traveling is just so much fun, I am really happy I was introduced to mr. Alberto Javier, I must say, financially he turned my story around.
Mr. Alberto Javier is gaining popularity as everyday passes, well I am not surprised because a man who has the talent to make a profit of $10,000 with an initial investment of $1,000 in just over a month of trading deserves respect and recognition.
You’re totally right friend, if only I knew him sooner, my life would have been filled with adventures, well the important thing is that I am benefiting and making profit with his help and I am very happy I know him.
@@mohammadsaqib4004i like how he uses the same account while pretending to be different person. Just shows how these bots and scammers aren't even putting much work into what they're doing.
Come on lar..if you think your lens is so damn good. Let see you can capture planet Jupiter at 600x zoom & show it to the world in youtube if you could...🤔🤔🤗🤗
-Taipei 101 reception, how may I help you? -Yeah, I live a mile away, and I see that one screw is missing on the very top, so I thought maybe you would like to send someone to fix it? -Sir, don't waste our time with these prank calls
30x is at 800 f5.6. Assuming cross has 8000 pixels (48 MP sensor or similar), there are rooms for 2X crop (digital zoom). That means there are about 9x optical magnifications = 3x3 (two kenko 3X extender EF mount) or 1.5x2x (2 sets). So the set up (or a similar focal range) is totally accessible by most hobbyists. I think the amazing things are: (1) the IS worked really well; (2) the air was clear; and (3) the screws and fluorescent tube in the final range are clearly identifiable. Given so many extenders/teleconverters stacked, the final image also has huge color aberrations -- which were understandable.
@@LISTEDGames 4000 usd used, or 9000 usd new, including Tamron 16-300, sigma 300-800, and 2-3 teleconverters. Camera body separate, another 800 usd for used.
@@LISTEDGames Well, you won't have the aperture (f5.6 at 800 mm) and VR/IS options/upgrades with the p1000. Lenses also work for any future cameras (say 100 megapixels down the line). So you get what you pay for.
Years ago I had a 4.5 inch reflector telescope. The first time I looked at the moon I gasped as it was so vivid it looked 3 dimensional. Also seeing Saturn's rings was really exciting. One day while visiting a cousin who lived on a farm I saw a little yellow speck about a half mile away across an alfalfa field just into the woods on the other side of the field. I aimed the telescope at the tiny yellow speck and all I could see was the upper left corner of the N of a No Trespassing sign. Unbelievable.
@@deecee6780 Absolutely. I would say that if you held a small pea out at arm's length that's how big Saturn seemed through the telescope. I was able to see at least 2 rings.
I don’t know the specs off of the top of my head but my daughter and I have seen Saturn’s rings through our $300 telescope at home. It was really cool and I was even able to take some nice pics of the moon using my iPhone.
Are you saved? If you died tonight would you go to heaven or hell? The Gospel, which means the Good News is the news that God Almighty, the Creator came in the flesh as Jesus Christ to take away the sin of the world. The one God is a trinity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The Son came and laid down his own life to save ours. His sacrifice on the cross paid the price for our redemption with his own blood. On the third day he rose from dead and offers the gift of salvation and forgiveness to those that repent and trust in him. Although God's creation was created perfect, having no death, sickness and disease, the creation became corrupted through Adam and Eve in them disobeying God. In this rebellion the creation became fallen through the curse of sin and mankind became separated from God. This world is fallen, but God offers reconciliation to him through his provision at the cross. Ultimately God will restore his creation to perfection when he returns but those that who reject his offer of redemption will remain condemned by their sins and go to hell. 1 Timothy 3:16 KJV And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. John 1:1,14 KJV In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and THE WORD WAS GOD. [14] And THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH, and dwelt among us, 1 John 3:8 KJV He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. Hebrews 2:14-16 KJV Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; [15] And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. [16] For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham. Isaiah 9:6 KJV For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty GOD, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. John 1:10 KJV He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and THE WORLD KNEW HIM NOT. John 20:28-29 KJV And Thomas answered and said unto him, MY LORD AND MY GOD. [29] Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed. Acts 16:30-31 KJV ...what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: [9] Not of works, lest any man should boast. 1 John 1:8-10 KJV If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. [9] If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. [10] If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us. GOD CREATED THE WHOLE UNIVERSE, INCLUDING THE ORIGINAL PLANTS, ANIMALS AND THE FIRST TWO HUMANS (ADAM AND EVE) IN SIX LITERAL 24- HOUR DAYS. GOD CREATED THE EARTH AS A GLOBAL PARADISE, THERE WAS NO DEATH, SICKNESS OR DISEASE. MAN LIKE ALL OF THE ANIMALS ATE VEGETATION. ALL WAS PERFECT. Genesis 1-2 GOD CREATED ADAM, THE FIRST MAN OUT OF DUST Genesis 2.7, GOD COMMANDS ADAM NOT TO EAT FROM THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL BECAUSE, THE TREE WILL BRING DEATH Genesis 2:16-17 GOD MAKES EVE, THE FIRST WOMAN FROM ADAM'S RIB Genesis 2.18-23 ADAM AND EVE WERE NAKED AND NOT ASHAMED Genesis 2.25 THE DEVIL APPEARS TO EVE AS A SNAKE AND CAUSES HER TO DOUBT GOD'S WORD Genesis 3:1 THE DEVIL LIES, TO EVE AND SAYS THAT THEY WILL NOT DIE IF THEY TAKE FROM THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT. Genesis 3.3 ADAM AND EVE EAT THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT Genesis 3.6 ADAM AND EVE'S EYES WERE OPENED. THEY KNEW THEY WERE NAKED AND HID IN SHAME. Genesis 3.7 ADAM AND EVE ATTEMPTED TO HIDE FROM GOD Genesis 3.8 GOD CURSES THE DEVIL Genesis 3.14 GOD PROPHESIES OF HIS REDEMPTION OF MAN AND THE DEFEAT OF THE DEVIL Genesis 3.15 GOD MULTIPLIES THE WOMAN'S SORROW AND CONCEPTION AND HAS THE HUSBAND RULE OVER HER Genesis 3.16 GOD CURSED THE GROUND FOR ADAM'S SAKE. THORNS AND THISTLES WERE BROUGHT FORTH Genesis 3.17 THE HUMAN BODY WILL RETURN TO DUST Genesis 3.19 GOD CLOTHED ADAM AND EVE Genesis 3.21 GOD DROVE ADAM AND EVE OUT OF THE GARDEN Genesis 22-24 THROUGH ADAM, CONDEMNATION CAME UPON ALL MEN AND ALL BECAME SINNERS. Romans 5.18-19 GOD, THE CREATOR TAKEN ON FLESH AND ENTERED THE WORLD AS JESUS CHRIST GOD REDEEMS MANKIND John 10.11, Isaiah 53, Psalm 49.15 John 1.1-14 WHOEVER BELIEVES ON CHRIST HAS ETERNAL LIFE, THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE ARE CONDEMNED ALREADY John 3:15-20 THOSE THAT DENY THAT GOD CAME IN THE FLESH ARE ANTICHRIST 1 John 4.3, John 1.1-14, John 20.28, 2 John 2.7 THOSE THAT DENY THE FATHER AND SON ARE ANTICHRIST 1 John. 2.22 THE ONE GOD IS A TRINITY OF THE FATHER, THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT Matthew 28.19, 1 John 5.7 SALVATION IS IN CHRIST ALONE Acts 4:12, Psalm 45.22
I am sorry but are you blind? You can clearly see at the 600x the whole image just wobbling, and its not shaky at all becase he has a stable platform and moving the image remotely…..
Not really strange.. The more you zoom, the less zoom needed for the next multiplier interval (whole numbers). Going from 1x to 2x makes the biggest difference and dwindles as you progress. It’s the same as cutting a picture of the landscape in half, over and over again and blowing it up to it’s original size. With each zoom, there’s less distance across the picture to make a difference. It’s strange to me why 20x-50x and 300x-600x caught your eye when zoom levels in its entirety make a perfect exponential curve on a graph.
@@ballaking1000 huh? This doesn't make sense. 1x to 2x is the same magnification as 2x to 4x 32x is 2^5 and 512x is 2^9 and so the later is 2^4 = 16x more magnification. It is almost surely due to detail and psychology. The fact is that if those numbers are correct Go to the 5x image and then look at the top of the building where the final zoom ends up and then compare. 600/5 = 120. Then take that sphere at the top and stack it horizontally 120 times and it should fit perfectly. In fact, to cheat, notice that the youtube time bar is 2m which is 120 seconds. The sphere is about 1 second in width so you can se there will be 120 of them. It is likely that by "minimal distance" is the confusion with detail. That is, the detail of structure is not the same at all scale levels(well, it is if you mean atomic detail but not if you mean manmade detail).
@@jsmdnq My math is correct, yours is too but the reasoning behind it is flawed. 1x - 2x IS the same as 2x - 4x, that's correct. The difference lies in that you had to skip 3x to make that same rate-of-difference. You'd also have to skip 5x - 6x - 7x to arrive from 4x - 8x. Notice how it jumped from skipping 1 increment to 3, the next would be 7.. That's what makes it exponential and why zoom levels become more sensitive as you zoom further in. Sidenote: it's much more convincing if you stay away from words like "surely", "should" and "likely" when trying to refute someone.
@UCXv3XwEyoze6sutnSmNtmMw Whatever. To me it sounds like you sorta realize you are wrong but have to be right so you are trying to say I'm wrong for using actual words mathematicians use(I would know because I'm one). Magnification is a pure quantity representing a scaling factor. You can't change the math. If something that is X times the magnification isn't X times then I don't know what to tell you. There is no exponential curve involved. Magnification is a linear equation: O = M*I where M is a real number, usually given as a ratio of 2 integers(a rational number). e.g., y = a/b*x then a/b is scaling factor of x. A 32x factor is y = 32*x x can be a 2d image, a volume or whatever. A 600x factor is y = 600*x There is no "exponential curve". You tried to justify his "belief" about something using something you didn't fully comprehend and rather than admit you made a mistake you are trying to gloss over it with a "compromise" so you pretend you are right. This is now how things should work. I'm not trying to be an ass, I'm just right and you are wrong. Just how the universe worse. You shouldn't let your emotions get involved here. Now, if you mean something different you should explain it but what he is talking about is why the changes in magnification seem to be different. They are not. The rate of change(the derivative) of a linear function is a constant(no change). So all the change he is talking about is through perception. If there is anything "exponential" about that then you have to prove it in how his brain processes things, not in the realm of mathematics.
@@jsmdnq Mathematics is perfect; perception is not. What you're trying to convince me with is akin to trying to convince me that the second time I cut a piece of paper in half, it'll be the same size as when I had first cut it... How silly is that? If a camera were to start zooming in at the exact same rate without accelerating or decelerating- the incremental change of magnification will very quickly start to ramp up. For crissakes, just look at your monitor screen.. Pretend the edges of your screen were offset with a rectangular digital line that started moving towards the middle of your screen at a linear speed.. Even though the lines of the rectangle are moving at a fixed rate inward, the ratio from what's inside the rectangle to outside the rectangle (within your monitor screen space) will dramatically increase as the rectangle becomes smaller (EXACT same idea as with magnification). Last comment you'll get from me as I can't make it any simpler for you.
My guess on the setup: Canon EOS with 1.6 crop. Canon 16mm - 35mm lens = 16mm x 1.6 crop = 25mm. Various Canon lens up to the 800mm. Three 2x extenders plus a 1.4 extender - 1,600mm, 3,200mm, 6,400mm, 8,960mm 8,960mm x 1.6 crop = 14,336mm 14,336mm rounded up to 15,000mm
@@tdawg719 2 stop loss of light for each and a loss of resolution as well, but yes, you can stack 2X extenders. ISO 112,800 with 1/30 shutter speed in bright sunlight should be enough for good exposure with video.
It's not exactly the same, but NIKON P1000 does it very close to this. Small sensors, by definition, capture image like zooming a very little part of a full frame in.
Wrong tool for the job... you need proper mount with tracking and long exposure and the visible shaking is caused by only small % of atmosphere that would be in case of making pictures of a planet.
Eso se hace en horas de la mañana, cuando el aire todavía no se ha calentado por el sol. Asombra la definición y como resuelve el problema de la gota negra. Felicitaciones !
I don't know what a drone is, unless you mean a Quadcopter. What a stupid word. One minute 'drone' is a bee, the next it's a machine, then it's a plane, next it's a model Quadcopter, then again it's a person, and lastly (maybe not the last, as more ignorant, poorly educated, low IQ illiterates continue to use a word that means a continuous humming sound, as a name to name things that aren't 'drone'), they are also calling military aircraft and weapons of mass destruction - drone. Pfft! It's just a word, not a name because 'drone' has present and past participles 'droning' and 'droned' and a number of definitions. Are these also names? Can you use 'droning' and 'droned' to call someone or some machine, or toy? Do names have present and past participles and definitions? Does your name? Can you say, 'Let's go fly a droning? No, why? Because these aren't names but word, present and past participles of 'drone'. What schools did you go not to know this? Sometimes I am itching to laugh at the terrible ignorance in this world. It's a wonder we are in a mess, even with this Coronavirus going on, you still buy Chinese made junk sending billions back to China and helping a communist country getting powerful as I speak, best army, best military, warships, best of everything while the world is jobless. Right now how many bullshit 'drone' are leaving China? All because you want these garbages. Think about it, a million of them at prices from $350 cheaper models to $2000 top of the range, then calculate how much money goes back to China, money that should have stayed in your country. You see? Ignorant sheep everywhere. No wonder China laughs. I've always wondered to myself during my years at school, what will happen to all these dunces when they finish school and start adulthood, will they be highly intellectuals or will they remain the same low IQ, 'no spikka da inglisha' illiterates? 40 years later, I discovered the truth. Always smiling...
@@mickcarson8504 i couldnt be bothered to read your comment but i just have one question. Why the fuck did you take like 5 minutes of your day to type 7 paragraphs in a UA-cam reply?
Which camera body is this and lens combo because 800mm on apsc is only 1280mm and on Pentax Q is 4480mm even with 2x teleconverter it's still only 8960mm, how do you get 15000mm
everyone going on about privacy... you're on the internet. you own a computer (smartphones included). you've surrendered all privacy already. a scope or drone is the least of your worries.
@@thomasafrica9724 I'm going on about complaints/people believing they have privacy on the social platforms they use. I'm not complaining about privacy as I know very well the extent of our privacy and couldn't care less about it xd
Come on lar..if you think your lens is so damn good. Let see you can capture planet Jupiter at 600x zoom & show it to the world in youtube if you could...🤔🤔🤗🤗.......'x
@Hiffalomanis if you turned heads when you were younger, the only heads you will turn when youre older are the ones attached to walkers and too arthritic to look up beyond their own shuffling feet!
Me too. I have a 2x and 1.4x extender, but even on my biggest lens that is only 1/10th of this. And it doesn't look to be done with digital zoom at the end.
That's because UFOs have technology that will tell them whether you have a recording device so they only show up when you don't have one or have a brick.
@Simon Dominic do you mean satellites imagery?..surely with filters and the like I would have thought that atmospheric diffusion could be virtually nullified. This is only my opinion. Also I'm going back some (my first camera was a m.e super!!and a Olympus 0M1(manual)!!!!
About the best you can get from a spy satellite is 5 to 10 cm. It’s determined by physics, the wavelengths of light, and the size of the mirrors etc. That hasn’t changed since the 60’s. Now you can use computers to try and “clean up” the images, but that’s as good as resolution as you can get from an orbiting altitude. Any better is science fiction. Or movie magic.
This should be a nice location to add to my must visit bucket list, traveling is just so much fun, I am really happy I was introduced to mr. Alberto Javier, I must say, financially he turned my story around.
Mr. Alberto Javier is gaining popularity as everyday passes, well I am not surprised because a man who has the talent to make a profit of $10,000 with an initial investment of $1,000 in just over a month of trading deserves respect and recognition.
You’re totally right friend, if only I knew him sooner, my life would have been filled with adventures, well the important thing is that I am benefiting and making profit with his help and I am very happy I know him.
To anyone reading this is scam those are bot comments be aware . And ask someone you know personally
@@mohammadsaqib4004i like how he uses the same account while pretending to be different person. Just shows how these bots and scammers aren't even putting much work into what they're doing.
Nice mount! 600x with minor shaking is incredible
Come on lar..if you think your lens is so damn good. Let see you can capture planet Jupiter at 600x zoom & show it to the world in youtube if you could...🤔🤔🤗🤗
@@roxy_xcxc6869 wtf is wrong with u
@@annickgunes8834 Jealousy...
Also no chromatic aberration
@@Gameplayer55055 and what about distortion?
-Taipei 101 reception, how may I help you?
-Yeah, I live a mile away, and I see that one screw is missing on the very top, so I thought maybe you would like to send someone to fix it?
-Sir, don't waste our time with these prank calls
NASA called, they want their Hubble space telescope back...
Can you Explain that??
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
LOL 😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
The ocean called they’re running out of shrimp
Cautious alert for Couples who keep the windows open 🤣
Nirmal krishna I was ass naked last night 😂
@@KandiKlover, delete this.
Jørd 🤣🤣🤣
hahaha 😂😂😂
Now p..n is in yours smartphone)Is most simple.
When its more windy you might be able to record the tower end moving around quite significantly.
This looks like a lens a Private Investigator would love! They'd stake out down the block and could catch everything, without even being detected. 😂
30x is at 800 f5.6. Assuming cross has 8000 pixels (48 MP sensor or similar), there are rooms for 2X crop (digital zoom). That means there are about 9x optical magnifications = 3x3 (two kenko 3X extender EF mount) or 1.5x2x (2 sets). So the set up (or a similar focal range) is totally accessible by most hobbyists. I think the amazing things are: (1) the IS worked really well; (2) the air was clear; and (3) the screws and fluorescent tube in the final range are clearly identifiable. Given so many extenders/teleconverters stacked, the final image also has huge color aberrations -- which were understandable.
So how much do you think his setup would cost?
@@LISTEDGames 4000 usd used, or 9000 usd new, including Tamron 16-300, sigma 300-800, and 2-3 teleconverters. Camera body separate, another 800 usd for used.
@@GatorWinup dang, p1000 sounds better value now, guess you're paying a lot for Extra
@@LISTEDGames Well, you won't have the aperture (f5.6 at 800 mm) and VR/IS options/upgrades with the p1000. Lenses also work for any future cameras (say 100 megapixels down the line). So you get what you pay for.
@@GatorWinup yea I know but not everyone has 4k to splurge like that, hopefully as technology progresses these will become cheaper
Years ago I had a 4.5 inch reflector telescope. The first time I looked at the moon I gasped as it was so vivid it looked 3 dimensional. Also seeing Saturn's rings was really exciting. One day while visiting a cousin who lived on a farm I saw a little yellow speck about a half mile away across an alfalfa field just into the woods on the other side of the field. I aimed the telescope at the tiny yellow speck and all I could see was the upper left corner of the N of a No Trespassing sign. Unbelievable.
😂😂😂
Hahahah but btw was saturn thing true using your telescope?
@@deecee6780 Absolutely. I would say that if you held a small pea out at arm's length that's how big Saturn seemed through the telescope. I was able to see at least 2 rings.
I don’t know the specs off of the top of my head but my daughter and I have seen Saturn’s rings through our $300 telescope at home. It was really cool and I was even able to take some nice pics of the moon using my iPhone.
It is actually 3 dimensional, the moon is.
Mind-blowing how far you can see with the right tech.
Imagine all the nice windows he's looked into over the years 🦼
Only reason to own one in a city with high rise buildings!
creep
i thought that was the point of the video to show us what he does? lol
This guy: 1% youtube , 99% watching others windows
The reason why you should always close your curtains before undressing even in a high-rise 😁
Privacy has LEFT the building... where can I buy one
Close the curtains
Try in Amazon
They cost 20k
$99 bucks on Amazon prime day but you missed it.
@@realcyberpirate :( you had to mention that after prime day didn't ya... rub it in why don't ya.
Within 3 minutes of getting that lens home I’m looking through apartment windows for girls, guaranteed 🤣
Oof
I will use at night time
igloo productions perv
Well then lets hope you get arrested very quickly
FBI
Taiwan truly is a great country to take photos in!
The amount of optical zoom details on this will blow every digital zoom smartphone out of the waters!
obviously
100%😄 also considering this setup costs maybe 15k it better should😂
@@vincentlammert7003 Probably more than that...
How to love your ex gf when the restraining order says that you can't be closer to her than 1600 meters.
Marco Carpinella what have you done??! Mad people 😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Made my day
Yeah till you see her with her new boyfriend
Who's going to take your home,, tonight,, ( the cars ),, or every move you make, ( sting), , ja, ja, ja,,
Amazing zoom
Thats kind of scary lollllll
Good
Hiii how are u
Are you saved? If you died tonight would you go to heaven or hell?
The Gospel, which means the Good News is the news that God Almighty, the Creator came in the flesh as Jesus Christ to take away the sin of the world. The one God is a trinity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The Son came and laid down his own life to save ours. His sacrifice on the cross paid the price for our redemption with his own blood. On the third day he rose from dead and offers the gift of salvation and forgiveness to those that repent and trust in him. Although God's creation was created perfect, having no death, sickness and disease, the creation became corrupted through Adam and Eve in them disobeying God. In this rebellion the creation became fallen through the curse of sin and mankind became separated from God. This world is fallen, but God offers reconciliation to him through his provision at the cross. Ultimately God will restore his creation to perfection when he returns but those that who reject his offer of redemption will remain condemned by their sins and go to hell.
1 Timothy 3:16 KJV
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: GOD WAS MANIFEST IN THE FLESH, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.
John 1:1,14 KJV
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and THE WORD WAS GOD. [14] And THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH, and dwelt among us,
1 John 3:8 KJV
He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.
Hebrews 2:14-16 KJV
Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; [15] And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage. [16] For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
Isaiah 9:6 KJV
For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty GOD, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
John 1:10 KJV
He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and THE WORLD KNEW HIM NOT.
John 20:28-29 KJV
And Thomas answered and said unto him, MY LORD AND MY GOD. [29] Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
Acts 16:30-31 KJV
...what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: [9] Not of works, lest any man should boast.
1 John 1:8-10 KJV
If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. [9] If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. [10] If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
GOD CREATED THE WHOLE UNIVERSE, INCLUDING THE ORIGINAL PLANTS, ANIMALS AND THE FIRST TWO HUMANS (ADAM AND EVE) IN SIX LITERAL 24- HOUR DAYS. GOD CREATED THE EARTH AS A GLOBAL PARADISE, THERE WAS NO DEATH, SICKNESS OR DISEASE. MAN LIKE ALL OF THE ANIMALS ATE VEGETATION. ALL WAS PERFECT.
Genesis 1-2
GOD CREATED ADAM, THE FIRST MAN OUT OF DUST
Genesis 2.7,
GOD COMMANDS ADAM NOT TO EAT FROM THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL BECAUSE, THE TREE WILL BRING DEATH
Genesis 2:16-17
GOD MAKES EVE, THE FIRST WOMAN FROM ADAM'S RIB
Genesis 2.18-23
ADAM AND EVE WERE NAKED AND NOT ASHAMED
Genesis 2.25
THE DEVIL APPEARS TO EVE AS A SNAKE AND CAUSES HER TO DOUBT GOD'S WORD
Genesis 3:1
THE DEVIL LIES, TO EVE AND SAYS THAT THEY WILL NOT DIE IF THEY TAKE FROM THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT.
Genesis 3.3
ADAM AND EVE EAT THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT
Genesis 3.6
ADAM AND EVE'S EYES WERE OPENED. THEY KNEW THEY WERE NAKED AND HID IN SHAME.
Genesis 3.7
ADAM AND EVE ATTEMPTED TO HIDE FROM GOD
Genesis 3.8
GOD CURSES THE DEVIL
Genesis 3.14
GOD PROPHESIES OF HIS REDEMPTION OF MAN AND THE DEFEAT OF THE DEVIL
Genesis 3.15
GOD MULTIPLIES THE WOMAN'S SORROW AND CONCEPTION AND HAS THE HUSBAND RULE OVER HER
Genesis 3.16
GOD CURSED THE GROUND FOR ADAM'S SAKE. THORNS AND THISTLES WERE BROUGHT FORTH
Genesis 3.17
THE HUMAN BODY WILL RETURN TO DUST
Genesis 3.19
GOD CLOTHED ADAM AND EVE
Genesis 3.21
GOD DROVE ADAM AND EVE OUT OF THE GARDEN
Genesis 22-24
THROUGH ADAM, CONDEMNATION CAME UPON ALL MEN AND ALL BECAME SINNERS.
Romans 5.18-19
GOD, THE CREATOR TAKEN ON FLESH AND ENTERED THE WORLD AS JESUS CHRIST
GOD REDEEMS MANKIND
John 10.11, Isaiah 53, Psalm 49.15
John 1.1-14
WHOEVER BELIEVES ON CHRIST HAS ETERNAL LIFE, THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE ARE CONDEMNED ALREADY
John 3:15-20
THOSE THAT DENY THAT GOD CAME IN THE FLESH ARE ANTICHRIST
1 John 4.3, John 1.1-14, John 20.28, 2 John 2.7
THOSE THAT DENY THE FATHER AND SON ARE ANTICHRIST
1 John. 2.22
THE ONE GOD IS A TRINITY OF THE FATHER, THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT
Matthew 28.19, 1 John 5.7
SALVATION IS IN CHRIST ALONE
Acts 4:12, Psalm 45.22
@@jesusisgod2953 good amazing
Oh glorious optical zoom 🤤. For those interested, you too can have this little trinket, for the meagre sum of 12,000 USD.
@@rustneversleep
Yeah…..used.
Who else was expecting night zoom at the end?
/Cares
Defo
Only a pervert like you expects a night zoom.
@@panthergaming732
What's perverted about that?
Galileo Galilei would have gone nuts with a 600X pointed towards Jupiter's moons
By that do you mean He'd be excited to have his photographic instruments aiming at a pair of tits?
He would’ve creamed himself
a view so far you can see atmospheric distortions in the frame. wow!
I get that with my 1250mm telescope attached to a Full Frame DSLR.
The best zoom video, ever!!
😂 gold!
Its amazing how it removes atmospheric haze the more it zooms in!
yeah the final shot is edited in post lmfao and taken from a different place or on a different day/time. good catch
I am sorry but are you blind? You can clearly see at the 600x the whole image just wobbling, and its not shaky at all becase he has a stable platform and moving the image remotely…..
Buildings and whole city like that moves of wind and in structures of people's, elevators etc..
Finally, I can do streephotography from the 47th floor of my building
"Are you a Peeping Tom with money to burn? Well YOU need to get yourself the 25mm-15000mm 600X Super-telephoto ZOOM- Canon EF 800mm F5.6 IS!!!"
Taipei 101. Dreaming to vizit you again !
Its strange how 20-50x and 300-600x-- seemed to make minimal differences in the transition range.
Not really strange.. The more you zoom, the less zoom needed for the next multiplier interval (whole numbers). Going from 1x to 2x makes the biggest difference and dwindles as you progress. It’s the same as cutting a picture of the landscape in half, over and over again and blowing it up to it’s original size. With each zoom, there’s less distance across the picture to make a difference. It’s strange to me why 20x-50x and 300x-600x caught your eye when zoom levels in its entirety make a perfect exponential curve on a graph.
@@ballaking1000 huh? This doesn't make sense. 1x to 2x is the same magnification as 2x to 4x
32x is 2^5 and 512x is 2^9 and so the later is 2^4 = 16x more magnification.
It is almost surely due to detail and psychology. The fact is that if those numbers are correct
Go to the 5x image and then look at the top of the building where the final zoom ends up and then compare.
600/5 = 120.
Then take that sphere at the top and stack it horizontally 120 times and it should fit perfectly.
In fact, to cheat, notice that the youtube time bar is 2m which is 120 seconds. The sphere is about 1 second in width so you can se there will be 120 of them.
It is likely that by "minimal distance" is the confusion with detail. That is, the detail of structure is not the same at all scale levels(well, it is if you mean atomic detail but not if you mean manmade detail).
@@jsmdnq My math is correct, yours is too but the reasoning behind it is flawed. 1x - 2x IS the same as 2x - 4x, that's correct. The difference lies in that you had to skip 3x to make that same rate-of-difference. You'd also have to skip 5x - 6x - 7x to arrive from 4x - 8x. Notice how it jumped from skipping 1 increment to 3, the next would be 7.. That's what makes it exponential and why zoom levels become more sensitive as you zoom further in. Sidenote: it's much more convincing if you stay away from words like "surely", "should" and "likely" when trying to refute someone.
@UCXv3XwEyoze6sutnSmNtmMw Whatever. To me it sounds like you sorta realize you are wrong but have to be right so you are trying to say I'm wrong for using actual words mathematicians use(I would know because I'm one).
Magnification is a pure quantity representing a scaling factor. You can't change the math. If something that is X times the magnification isn't X times then I don't know what to tell you. There is no exponential curve involved. Magnification is a linear equation:
O = M*I
where M is a real number, usually given as a ratio of 2 integers(a rational number). e.g.,
y = a/b*x
then a/b is scaling factor of x. A 32x factor is
y = 32*x
x can be a 2d image, a volume or whatever.
A 600x factor is
y = 600*x
There is no "exponential curve". You tried to justify his "belief" about something using something you didn't fully comprehend and rather than admit you made a mistake you are trying to gloss over it with a "compromise" so you pretend you are right.
This is now how things should work. I'm not trying to be an ass, I'm just right and you are wrong. Just how the universe worse. You shouldn't let your emotions get involved here.
Now, if you mean something different you should explain it but what he is talking about is why the changes in magnification seem to be different. They are not. The rate of change(the derivative) of a linear function is a constant(no change).
So all the change he is talking about is through perception. If there is anything "exponential" about that then you have to prove it in how his brain processes things, not in the realm of mathematics.
@@jsmdnq Mathematics is perfect; perception is not. What you're trying to convince me with is akin to trying to convince me that the second time I cut a piece of paper in half, it'll be the same size as when I had first cut it... How silly is that? If a camera were to start zooming in at the exact same rate without accelerating or decelerating- the incremental change of magnification will very quickly start to ramp up. For crissakes, just look at your monitor screen.. Pretend the edges of your screen were offset with a rectangular digital line that started moving towards the middle of your screen at a linear speed.. Even though the lines of the rectangle are moving at a fixed rate inward, the ratio from what's inside the rectangle to outside the rectangle (within your monitor screen space) will dramatically increase as the rectangle becomes smaller (EXACT same idea as with magnification). Last comment you'll get from me as I can't make it any simpler for you.
My guess on the setup:
Canon EOS with 1.6 crop.
Canon 16mm - 35mm lens = 16mm x 1.6 crop = 25mm.
Various Canon lens up to the 800mm.
Three 2x extenders plus a 1.4 extender - 1,600mm, 3,200mm, 6,400mm, 8,960mm
8,960mm x 1.6 crop = 14,336mm
14,336mm rounded up to 15,000mm
I had no idea you can stack teleconverters
I think they also zoomed in from 4k to 1080p
@@tdawg719 2 stop loss of light for each and a loss of resolution as well, but yes, you can stack 2X extenders. ISO 112,800 with 1/30 shutter speed in bright sunlight should be enough for good exposure with video.
Can you forcus that cam to the space at night...then check the space... Try it..
Waruna Sanjeewa without a tracker the stars would move to fast.
SidKillz actually the same but at least the aperture would be enough to see something on a video since the moon is very bright.
Check my video with my Nikon ua-cam.com/video/IEEBf5SorNE/v-deo.html
@@Guap303 nice
@@Maheshrpsharma thanks
This is so useful for when you leave the house and forget the grocery list
I would just love to have this lens. Top of the class.
It's not exactly the same, but NIKON P1000 does it very close to this.
Small sensors, by definition, capture image like zooming a very little part of a full frame in.
Hi Kyle can you please zoom into planets because i only see people using Nikon p1000 125x zooming into planets while yours are 600x
Wrong tool for the job... you need proper mount with tracking and long exposure and the visible shaking is caused by only small % of atmosphere that would be in case of making pictures of a planet.
Or the moon ?
The moon is not a planet. It's a moon.
@Mithrandir nope. Its the earths original crust
@Mithrandir we do live in a realm, but this is just stupid.
I actually watched the huawei p30 reviews and youtube suggest me this..
Me too
Top of the building looks like someplace Batman would sit and chill😂😂
Changing those bulbs must be fun.
"some extenders" how many teleconverters dis you use? Took full advantage of the 1.6 crop too!
Ахренительная оптика )))
At a nice cheap price of $13000, everyone should own one!
Eso se hace en horas de la mañana, cuando el aire todavía no se ha calentado por el sol. Asombra la definición y como resuelve el problema de la gota negra. Felicitaciones !
@Seek Him with all your heart and you will find Him fck off
Pa ver a la vecina cambiarse pa ir al trabajo 😂
@@Dgucci938 a quien intentan engañar es que flipo JAJAJAJJAJAJ
@Seek Him with all your heart and you will find Him take your poison somewhere else.
lo que se be es que tiembla el objetivo, no el calor del aire XD
...While some People are still focussing on drone laws haha
@@orlando9666 what he said
I don't know what a drone is, unless you mean a Quadcopter. What a stupid word. One minute 'drone' is a bee, the next it's a machine, then it's a plane, next it's a model Quadcopter, then again it's a person, and lastly (maybe not the last, as more ignorant, poorly educated, low IQ illiterates continue to use a word that means a continuous humming sound, as a name to name things that aren't 'drone'), they are also calling military aircraft and weapons of mass destruction - drone. Pfft! It's just a word, not a name because 'drone' has present and past participles 'droning' and 'droned' and a number of definitions. Are these also names? Can you use 'droning' and 'droned' to call someone or some machine, or toy? Do names have present and past participles and definitions? Does your name? Can you say, 'Let's go fly a droning? No, why? Because these aren't names but word, present and past participles of 'drone'. What schools did you go not to know this? Sometimes I am itching to laugh at the terrible ignorance in this world. It's a wonder we are in a mess, even with this Coronavirus going on, you still buy Chinese made junk sending billions back to China and helping a communist country getting powerful as I speak, best army, best military, warships, best of everything while the world is jobless. Right now how many bullshit 'drone' are leaving China? All because you want these garbages. Think about it, a million of them at prices from $350 cheaper models to $2000 top of the range, then calculate how much money goes back to China, money that should have stayed in your country. You see? Ignorant sheep everywhere. No wonder China laughs.
I've always wondered to myself during my years at school, what will happen to all these dunces when they finish school and start adulthood, will they be highly intellectuals or will they remain the same low IQ, 'no spikka da inglisha' illiterates? 40 years later, I discovered the truth. Always smiling...
@@mickcarson8504 i couldnt be bothered to read your comment but i just have one question. Why the fuck did you take like 5 minutes of your day to type 7 paragraphs in a UA-cam reply?
They can’t make laws on traditional optics thankfully, it’s freedom of observation.
@Đeath Vader why make assumptions about somebody you don’t know just because he’s testing out an amazing lens?
It's like using a sniper but you shoot photo.
Generally you don't use scopes with more than about 20-24x magnification on precision rifles. Usually even less than that.
Yeah even PUBG has only 15x scope..😆😆
Hiii how are u
すごいズームできますね‼️
いつか自分も使ってみたいです🎥✨
This makes me wanna go live outside cities without neighbours nearby me than potentially can look at my privacy with such ease
Very very nice. please more video.
Thanks.
This is the perfect PERV-SCOPE.. where are your "other" videos dude??
Oooh yea
V cool designed building. Looks like Chinese takeout boxes stacked on top of each other , only made from glass and steel !
При такой дистанции и таком увеличении, такой маленький "мираж". Удивительно...
the zoomed in shots are not from the hotel room or not from the same day or camera ...
I thought yeh will have a look...I fully expected someone looking back with a huge set of binoculars..ah well
Which camera body is this and lens combo because 800mm on apsc is only 1280mm and on Pentax Q is 4480mm even with 2x teleconverter it's still only 8960mm, how do you get 15000mm
Nope, shitty pentax q not even that high.
Elder Lich 2x +2x TC Like 4x😬
Instead of taking a trip to the mountains I could just take pictures of the mountains from the comfort of my home and call that a trip. LOL
Просто ах🤬енный зум...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍👍
everyone going on about privacy...
you're on the internet. you own a computer (smartphones included). you've surrendered all privacy already. a scope or drone is the least of your worries.
Aren't you technically 'going on' about privacy right now?😅
@@thomasafrica9724 I'm going on about complaints/people believing they have privacy on the social platforms they use. I'm not complaining about privacy as I know very well the extent of our privacy and couldn't care less about it xd
Amazing, especially as the longest Lens that Canon manufacture is an EF 1200 mm (or 13,800 mm shorter than this one).
Come on lar..if you think your lens is so damn good. Let see you can capture planet Jupiter at 600x zoom & show it to the world in youtube if you could...🤔🤔🤗🤗.......'x
compensate for crop-sensor bro
@@roxy_xcxc6869 did you just copy and past this into every comment?
@@roxy_xcxc6869 You don't use lenses to capture planet, you use telescops with mounted camears. These are not made by canon or any photo manufacturer
Best Rifle scope I've ever seen .
Imagine without the window, the quality would be even better. Amazing.
not sure about that, with the wind
@@DubElementMusic Or the fate of the photographer and the camera due to the wind lol.
can’t wait to vlog with this lens 💀
I didn't know that these things came with a music player
You must pay for the music.
@@tiago58 LoL 🤣🤣
That's powerful...
So powerful that I saw where I will be in two weeks from now!
Thanks for the warning!
That is insanely impressive, they have cameras in jail that can read letters an inch tall on the cement 100 yards away but this is just insane
So is making a cement plant in a jail!
@@andyxox4168 Where is a plant mentioned?
@@dickJohnsonpeter ops 😜
How much?!
www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/542293-REG/Canon_2746B002AA_EF_800mm_f_5_6L_IS.html
@@kylelin8000 isnt that a fixed focus lens? how was he able to reach 25mm? with a 800mm lens?
@@sto2779 he used different lenses for everything wider than 800mm
日本円で135万か おもったほどって感じ
1000万ぐらいしそう
@@kylelin8000 Oh my god. Oh god.
Now take it to the beach and look out.
Kinda reminds me of every television show and movie I have ever seen.
Good film! Congratulations!👍 In the end, however, I was disappointed. 🥺 I was convinced that it would zoom on kissing lovers! 😂🙈
I like your videos, keep going.
Thank you~~ I will~
Incredible..wow..the innovations that Japanese camera companies come out with... thanks for sharing...
Yes. They certainly are clever little people, aren't they?
if i knew i was in a 10 block radius of you i'd be making sure my card details are always covered by any window xD
Every paparazzi photographers' wet dream
When you're buying a condo and telling yourself no one can see in your big windows... this guy can.
he wont b looking for long in my windows. i use window film plus im well over 60...thats not very interesting trust me...
@Hiffalomanis if you turned heads when you were younger, the only heads you will turn when youre older are the ones attached to walkers and too arthritic to look up beyond their own shuffling feet!
How many extenders did you use??? I don't understand how you got the maximum focal length
Me too. I have a 2x and 1.4x extender, but even on my biggest lens that is only 1/10th of this. And it doesn't look to be done with digital zoom at the end.
My mans really bought the zoom and enhance cameras from the movies
the operator has nerves of steel! my hands are shaking much more
But when you see a UFO you would still use camera of your 10 yrs old Nokia phone
That's because UFOs have technology that will tell them whether you have a recording device so they only show up when you don't have one or have a brick.
A few more zoom ins and this telescope turns in to a microscope
And then back into a telescope
Did you notice he avoided zooming into the windows of the building 😁 with that kind of zoom you may get someone showering in his appartment 🤣🤣🤣.
Brother become a sniper with that lense, well agent47 would be proud of you :)
Muy impresionante el alcance de zoom de esta cámara
Super creepy lens version 2
Having such a result at 600X on such a smocky day is incredible. Therefore either the equipment is extraordinary or the video is a fake ?
This guy: 1% youtube , 99% watching others windows
How do you get 15000mm without the aperture becoming like f/100?
It's a 800mm f5.6 lens, with lots of teleconverter adapers
Наверное стоит как нормальный автомобиль)))
Да, по сегодняшнему курсу стоит более 2 млн руб.
как сам небоскреб
good test against the sky, no false colour looks well corrected.
Wow! At night looks so cool! I wanna go taiwan!
Отличный объектив, 👍
Who else thought he'd zoom into random guy digging in his nose?🙃
i would definitely do that.
@@jonnywondr
Dig in your nose?😳🤣🤣
@@swashbucklingadventures9929 lmao yea that too!
@@jonnywondr
Good job man👍🤣🤣
I think he will focus on “okay” symbol on paper... like... gotcha man
Thats really awesome man. I had an idea like this for surveillance
what an insignificant aperture it must have!
From the thumbnail I thought it was a rocket launcher 🤣
Now imagine what a satellites capability is!!..long ago are the days when all they could read was a newspaper headline!!
@Simon Dominic do you mean satellites imagery?..surely with filters and the like I would have thought that atmospheric diffusion could be virtually nullified. This is only my opinion. Also I'm going back some (my first camera was a m.e super!!and a Olympus 0M1(manual)!!!!
About the best you can get from a spy satellite is 5 to 10 cm. It’s determined by physics, the wavelengths of light, and the size of the mirrors etc. That hasn’t changed since the 60’s. Now you can use computers to try and “clean up” the images, but that’s as good as resolution as you can get from an orbiting altitude. Any better is science fiction. Or movie magic.
samoloty jak sieją opryski zobacz. Widać dysze spryskiwaczy czy to smuga kondensacyjna z silników odrzutowych? pozdrawiam serdecznie z Polski 🇵🇱
wow amazing .. i saw few of your videos ... what is the cost for such an powerful instrument ?
wooooow its cool, im from Indonesian
Lihat! Tidak ada yang peduli! :)
Nice music..
Background music name pls..!
Darude Sandstorm
Let's Talk About Sex by Salt-N-Pepa
Is that a camera on your sniper rifle?
Finally something to help me put that tiny and very irritating screw in the frame of my glasses.
That's really impressive. Scary, though, if you're being spied on!
Thought the same thing 😅
it would cost $12k for someone to spy with this lense lmfao what are you hiding???
Ha! 😅
only if his name is Tom.
Wow amazing! How many extenders did you use?
All of them. lol
Tak, tak ... a Świstak zawija w złote sreberka ;)
That’s amazing. I don’t do photography, just curious what a rig that can do that costs, ballpark