Solving Differential Equations with Power Series: A Simple Example

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 лют 2025
  • Here we show how to solve a simple linear differential equation by solving for the Power Series expansion of the solution. This is an extremely powerful approach that can be used to solve nearly any differential equation, even nasty nonlinear equations.
    Playlist: • Engineering Math: Diff...
    Course Website: faculty.washing...
    @eigensteve on Twitter
    eigensteve.com
    databookuw.com
    This video was produced at the University of Washington
    %%% CHAPTERS %%%
    1:08 Solving Simple ODE with Power Series Expansion
    6:40 Recursively Match Coefficients of Each Power t^n
    12:50 The Full Solution: An Exponential Function

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @epictetus__
    @epictetus__ Рік тому +7

    Have to say out of all lectures I see on UA-cam, your lectures feels like I am right there in front of you when you are teaching... The way you communicate complex topics in simplified way is outstanding!!!!

  • @pureatheistic
    @pureatheistic Рік тому +5

    Absolutely been LOVING your lectures. I'm using them as refreshers, but I wish I could have learned all this brand new from you and these lectures.

  • @dennisbrown5313
    @dennisbrown5313 2 роки тому +5

    Best lecturer I've ever had the privilege to listen to - and I've complete Grad school.

  • @hoseinzahedifar1562
    @hoseinzahedifar1562 2 роки тому +4

    Exponential function and its Taylor series are fantastic tools in numerical time integration... what this function does is actually magic...😍😍... Thank you, Steve. 🌹🌹🌺

  • @An_Attempt
    @An_Attempt 2 роки тому +2

    This is a nice derivation of the taller series.

  • @corybeyer1
    @corybeyer1 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you for sharing your knowledge! An amazing explanation.

  • @hoseinzahedifar1562
    @hoseinzahedifar1562 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you very much for this lecture...
    Homework (Exercise):
    In time 5:41:You can kind of convince yourself that the only way for this (xdat(t) = ax(t)) to be true at every instant in time is for these (the polynomials of xdot(t) and ax(t)) to equal each other for every Power of 't'. This is actually a really good exercise to get comfortable with these series and think about if this is true for t equals zero, and one, and two, and three, in all time (you know, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, for all time), the only way that can be true for all time is that if every single term in these expansions of xdot(t) and ax(t) equal each other.

  • @kolkemboi1255
    @kolkemboi1255 3 місяці тому +1

    The casual C3PO made me laugh🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @Tyokok
    @Tyokok 2 роки тому

    Steve, cannot thank you enough!!!

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 11 місяців тому

    Informative lesson! Thanx! 😊

  • @NexusEight
    @NexusEight Рік тому

    Amazing. Nice one Steve.

  • @lioneloddo
    @lioneloddo 2 роки тому +3

    Beautiful. Beautiful, because we need to use an infinity of terms. No human could observe this infinity of polynomials. But, the greatness of the human mind is that it's not nececessary to see them. We just need to conceptualyse, to be logic and coherent. And then by magic, the exponential fonction appears.
    Euler was the king of this kind of reasonning. Euler is the guy who transformed calculation in art, who transformed calculation in a new branch of mathematics : The analysis.

  • @charlie3k
    @charlie3k 2 роки тому

    absolutely brilliant!

  • @coraltown1
    @coraltown1 2 роки тому

    Bravo ! .. and hats off to Euler !

  • @212ntruesdale
    @212ntruesdale Рік тому

    “write down a power series . . . “ Okay, but the one you wrote down I already knew was the power series for e^at.

  • @-mwolf
    @-mwolf 11 місяців тому

    I can't find the lecture series /playlst about the taylor series on your channel. There's two videos on that topic following this one in the DE playlist... did you mean that? Ok nvm yes it's just a vid and not a playlist. got confused since it came after this lecture.

  • @ericroberts5119
    @ericroberts5119 2 роки тому

    Nice video! So basically, if we do all this and don’t recognize the series/pattern, we just truncate the series to approximate the solution to the ODE ?

  • @jawadmansoor6064
    @jawadmansoor6064 2 роки тому

    2:05 how valid is this assumption? is there a proof for it?

  • @nwxxzchen3105
    @nwxxzchen3105 2 роки тому

    C0 disappears for derivative of X, why the two side still have same number of terms?

    • @marshall7253
      @marshall7253 2 роки тому

      Because the derivative was taken with respect to time (t). In this case c0 was a constant and not dependent on time. The rate of change of a constant is 0, hence why it disappeared.

    • @marshall7253
      @marshall7253 2 роки тому

      Also we're assuming it's an infinite series. So not exactly true for you to say equal number of terms.

    • @nwxxzchen3105
      @nwxxzchen3105 2 роки тому

      ​@@marshall7253 thanks, highest order of X's coefficient must be zero.

  • @ChristianRosenhagen
    @ChristianRosenhagen 11 місяців тому

    Why not using sigma for sums?

  • @wilburgonsalves7741
    @wilburgonsalves7741 2 роки тому +4

    C3PO 😆🙌