I was a kid back in 81 but my love for took off in 1984 with MTV . Listening to your story takes me back to the good old days physical format music. My first system was my older sisters centrex by pioneer it was a unit from the 70's and a loved it. Shame I didn't have a tape deck. One day my parents sold the house and we moved to Portugal and I had to make a choice but two systems the pioneer or an other cheap crappy system but I had a tape deck. I choose the crappy one boy was i dumb.... My first real hifi system was an Akai pro a 302 system which I still own. Great video thanks for sharing it.
Hi, Thanks for watching my video and for sharing your story. I understand why you chose the one with the tape deck because we all curated our own music collections. it was part of our development into who we were becoming as teenagers. Nice to have kept your Akai, hope it all still works well. Vince
hey Vince, it's so nice to watch this video. i'm 21 and i'm new to hi-fi world. my first system was all in one aiwa x-75 with aiwa sx-77 speakers from early 90s. it was very nice to some beginner like me. a month ago i decided to move next step and bought exact same amplifier as you, pioneer sa-720. well, it's not exact same system(x-990) with yours, i have tx-520L tuner, ct-720 cassette deck, sg-550 equalizer and i'm super close to buy pl-720 or pl-740 turntable. i'm listening this system with pioneer cs-777. i'm so happy with my system and it shocked me that i accidentally found this video. i would be very happy for listening rest of your story, regards.
Hi Çagatay, Thank you for watching and commenting on my video. I'm glad you 'found it' on UA-cam as it may be considered a bit niche giving I owned my system in the 1980s. I find it fascinating that you are trying to recreate such a system which is now quite historic, even though it was really very good when new. Thankfully good HiFi, reliant on tried and trusted components still deliver well today and to a certain extent the late 20th century May have been the best time for sound reproduction equipment. Digital music had the potential to improve quality but the ease of storing and copying it meant that many people were duped into collecting quantity not quality and the manufactures followed by introducing more gimmicks in their components and competed on cost rather than quality. I will try to get around to telling my continuing story at some time, where I fought to improve my sound systems before we all ended up with iPods and massive TVs which don't give a similar quality audio experience. I am sure you will enjoy it so why not subscribe so you will see when new content is released. And good luck with creating your own HiFi story. I wish you well in this endeavour. Vince
Hi Niks, Thanks for taking a look at my video and for your comment. Six CD capacity, twin tapes and a remote. My system was positively crude compared to your spec. It seems like I was not alone in thinking the Pioneer was a great bit of kit. Underrated at the time.
Walk down memory lane for me. Similar story here in the USA. Stereo systems were the rage. TV' were getting bigger so it was nice to upgrade them too. Since then I've upgraded many many times but still love some of those earlier pieces. Thanks for sharing!
Hi Bob, Thanks for watching my video and for your comments. It seems we have followed similar paths and shared similar thoughts about our HiFi. if you weren't aware I have now posted a second video about the Denon system which replaced my Pioneer set up. Called Mid 1980s Denon Based AV HiFi System on my vinceunlimited channel. Vince
there was a few ways you could connect a TV with no "AV out" to a stereo system, one way was to get a special box that allowed you to "split" RF signals into composite audio and video signals. Also starting in 1984, Pioneer offered a couple of receivers that had direct RF input that split the audio and video signals inside the receiver from an RF signal to a split composite audio and video signal, but boxes that did this has existed since the early 1970s.
Hi, thanks for taking a look at my video and the comment. Presumably, unless you had a component that split the RF into composite video and sound then a coordinated AV system couldn't be achieved. In my case I only had a relatively simple portable colour TV at the time which did not even offer RF throughput which precluded using a 'splitting box', plus I wasn't aware of such an accessory at the time. Learning about these various options becoming available and known about by me is what my HiFi stories are all about. I'm not sure whether you have noticed but I have already released a video about the next stage in my journey wherein I actually created an AV set up even before I knew they existed. Vince
corr they did spend alot of money in the past there was no stereo like this in my house 100% used gear now i have alot of toys to play with waiting all the time till i got my place was better for me love the video
Hi Bob, Thanks for watching my video and for your comment. This was just the start of my HiFi journey. I see you have already commented on my next video. Hope you enjoy the other videos as much. Vince
My parents got the X-550 which we were impressed with so the higher end system must have been very nice. I'm selling the cabinet and speakers on Ebay this week so thanks for making this video showing the brochure which I came across, I remember the components now. The components of our system got replaced just once with some Yamaha kit thought the turntable still works.
Hi Dave, thanks for taking a look at my video and for your comments. Yes, it was very nice. We also upgraded and I am working on the next episode. Subscribe to find out what we changed in the next video. And as a teaser, we did keep a key component. Thanks for sharing your memories. Vince
Completely insane!!! Those prices how possible?? I mean i did similar In the 70's with Yamaha and Advents and only records but US is so much cheaper. You guys are astonishing to me. I know the scale of your purchase
Must have loved music even more than we did and in the 70 's British Rock was at its peak. Our systems were important and Advent Bass was so superior we thought to others but it took 200 watts a channel to hear it. Back in 1976 it became a reality with fairly reasonable power amplifiers. In the USA and by Japan doing the same with giant receivers power was king. But again USA was reasonable. Seems like England as we called it back then was ridiculous
Thanks for your insights Kenneth. I also liked rock music in the seventies. At the time groups were really carving out their individual sounds and many tracks are familiar still today
Hi Psythik, Thanks for taking a look at my video, for subscribing and liking it. I loved your comment and I WILL bring you the next episode soon. It wouldn't be the vinceunlimited channel if I only concentrated on one subject but you have inspired me to bring the next HiFi story chapter forward. In fairness I was about to do this next anyway it just finding the time. But now I know you are waiting. Your wish will be my command, hopefully within a week. I'm just glad I didn't ask you to hold your breath. Vince
nice video about the past and the components of the time, I still own the following Pioneer speakers, CS 797- CS770- CS 999-CS 757. How many watts do you give them to the CS 757? the bass they gave it? Did you feel the bass? Thanks in advance
Hi Tiger, Thanks for taking a look at my video and for your comments. You sure have a good collection of Pioneer speakers. In the Pioneer set up I had it could deliver a maximum 65w per channel and the speakers handled it well with little distortion except near maximum volume. I'm not sure whether you have seen my follow up video in which I upgraded my system to one with Denon amplification. I kept the great Pioneer speakers and this time they were matched with amplification up to 100w per channel and did a great job in handling this extra power. The real problem was testing them at the higher levels as it became a bit loud to tolerate. All in all I think the Pioneer speakers were very competent and over-engineered for their original design. Vince
@@vinceunlimited Thanks for your time, I'm Italian and I use a translator, I hope my comments are understood. I will watch the video you suggested to me. My speakers that I have listed 797-770-999 have the canvas suspension and bass they give me I don't like and I will have to sell them, The CS 757 have FOAM suspension AND I have yet to test them but the FOAM bass is much more soft even if the foam It is not eternal but like it, so I only keep the CS 757 and the ESB Classic 600. I have read that the CS series For the European market is very bad, while for the Japanese and US market the quality is superior in everything . please I will watch the video you suggested to me👍🏻
@@Tiger-dl1yn Hi, Your translations are fine. I did not realise you were using a translator. Remember the performance levels I experienced were from using brand new speakers and sound sources at the time and my experiences were based on comparisons to other HiFi stuff at the time so my memory may be affected by these factors. However, since then, the design build of a speaker has not altered as radically as other components in a system. Your speakers may be decades old and it would be unsurprising if some of the materials used had not shown some effects of wear. Vince
@@vinceunlimited Hi Vince, I'm not talking about wear, but about the type of bass, in this case due to the canvas suspension that responds with a bass of the type (dun dun) while the bass of the woofers with FOAM suspension Like the 757 Which give a soft bass like (BUM BUM) That's why I want to sell the others
@@Tiger-dl1yn Soft bass is easier on the ear providing it is not muddied or muffled and that is dependent on the speaker construction as well as the ability of the amplification to control it. As you have discovered even similar products may not perform the same so testing them out and finding what suits you best is one of the pleasures of HiFi discovery
The 70s was the glory time for Pioneer and other big brands from Japan. The 80s was a time of cheapening and miniaturization... discreet circuitry replaced with ICs, flimsy build and power supplies the size of walnuts. Metal, glass and wood were replaced with plastic and more plastic. 1980 was the downward turning point for most Japanese stereo makers although signs of cost cutting had already begun in the late 70s.
Hi socksumi, Thanks for checking out my video and for adding a comment. I think you might be right in identifying that the late seventies and early eighties were a great quality point in HiFi technology although later IC technology did bring a theoretical new dimension in sound even if unit build quality was diminishing. Serious users had to move upmarket to chase the quality that mass production was leaving behind. Vince
Wasn't there a headphone socket on the front bottom right of the television ? I am absolutely sure plugging in a headphone jack going into RCA , connected to the Auxiliary, would've worked !
Hi Magnus, thanks for taking a look at my video and your insightful comment. I think you are right. The photographs I have show this. At the time I would not have thought of this option because I saw it as 'just' a headphone socket. It was my first set up so I was still learning the abilities of connections etc. Furthermore, had I thought about this, the lead would have protruded from the front and therefore been aesthetically unpleasant. As I didn't try this I will never know how this would have worked, for instance in controlling the volume [presumably a combination of the TV controls and amplifier setting] and whether syncing between picture and sound could be aligned. Vince
Isn't it weird how everything got replaced by a Bluetooth speaker when I was a kid bookshelf systems were everywhere now they seem to be nowhere Alexa have taken over
Hi Cyberbarbaro, Thanks for taking a look at my video and your question. The timer was a separate component included as it was a part of the whole set but really served a limited function. It has a clock display function and could be used as a timer either to automatically switch the system on or off but just as a switch. So you could set a wake up time so the system would start up in the morning playing the tuner [radio] or alternatively act as an automatic shut down when listening at night. I was always sceptical about using this because as far as I could tell it would be an uncontrolled power off so if you were in the middle of a cassette playing through the amplifier then it would act as it the power sockets were just switched off. Whether it was more sophisticated than that I'm not sure. In any case I didn't need the wake or sleep function as it was in a living room rather than bedroom so it was just really an overpriced clock and if I wanted to know the time I would just check my wristwatch. Vince
this is known by the X series that had comercials on tv, some had 79 slim amplifiers in brushed aluminium, mine had the CT-520 wich i still have it and two years ago i install new betls and seemed new again ,i have cassettes recorded there and they do sound good but in this deck they sound worse ,today using a CT-959(1990) they sound much better and try to re-record a cassette and it still records perfectelly but sounds much better in a more recent deck, nothing related with the azimuth , just the fact that they record better than they play and for the years and heavy use it still operates at 100% level with only new belts
vintage technology are the best why ? it made with good materials, made to work all life, have manual to repair and can find parts to fix it, after long time it made still works, i buy only vintage technology, this days we have only chinese garbage from china, and everything is made in china, love vintage technology
Hi, Thanks for taking a look at my video and your thoughts on vintage equipment. Of course when I had this system it was far from vintage. In fact all brand new. I agree that some things from this period have stood the test of time and some comments I have received confirm this. I understand what you mean by the detriment to build quality from mass market supply during the early 2000s due to customers preferring cheapness over quality but thankfully there are still some manufacturers that are producing good components with high grade materials and craftsmanship. But vintage stuff does still compete when it comes to style and ambiance. Vince
Hi, Well spotted. Yes it was specified at 38Hz to 20,000Hz. 38kHz would be inaudible unless you were a dog. But conversely they couldn't appreciate the low bass level so we win I guess. I did redeem myself at around the 10min 30s mark when I was advising the cost of the system wherein I noted the 38 to 20,000Hz range. Thanks for watching my video and your comment. Vince
Hi Summer, thanks for watching my video and your comments. Thankfully inflation on product prices is usually linked to increased wages, even if it doesn't always seem so. It was a great stereo system. Vince
Bonjour Alain, Merci pour votre commentaire. Pioneer fabrique toujours du Hi-Fi qui est disponible, y compris les produits Home Cinema, la mise en réseau, les composants individuels et les haut-parleurs. Bien que ce ne soit plus aussi courant qu'avant. Vince
I was a kid back in 81 but my love for took off in 1984 with MTV . Listening to your story takes me back to the good old days physical format music. My first system was my older sisters centrex by pioneer it was a unit from the 70's and a loved it. Shame I didn't have a tape deck. One day my parents sold the house and we moved to Portugal and I had to make a choice but two systems the pioneer or an other cheap crappy system but I had a tape deck. I choose the crappy one boy was i dumb....
My first real hifi system was an Akai pro a 302 system which I still own. Great video thanks for sharing it.
Hi, Thanks for watching my video and for sharing your story. I understand why you chose the one with the tape deck because we all curated our own music collections. it was part of our development into who we were becoming as teenagers. Nice to have kept your Akai, hope it all still works well. Vince
hey Vince, it's so nice to watch this video. i'm 21 and i'm new to hi-fi world. my first system was all in one aiwa x-75 with aiwa sx-77 speakers from early 90s. it was very nice to some beginner like me. a month ago i decided to move next step and bought exact same amplifier as you, pioneer sa-720. well, it's not exact same system(x-990) with yours, i have tx-520L tuner, ct-720 cassette deck, sg-550 equalizer and i'm super close to buy pl-720 or pl-740 turntable. i'm listening this system with pioneer cs-777. i'm so happy with my system and it shocked me that i accidentally found this video. i would be very happy for listening rest of your story, regards.
Hi Çagatay, Thank you for watching and commenting on my video. I'm glad you 'found it' on UA-cam as it may be considered a bit niche giving I owned my system in the 1980s. I find it fascinating that you are trying to recreate such a system which is now quite historic, even though it was really very good when new. Thankfully good HiFi, reliant on tried and trusted components still deliver well today and to a certain extent the late 20th century May have been the best time for sound reproduction equipment. Digital music had the potential to improve quality but the ease of storing and copying it meant that many people were duped into collecting quantity not quality and the manufactures followed by introducing more gimmicks in their components and competed on cost rather than quality. I will try to get around to telling my continuing story at some time, where I fought to improve my sound systems before we all ended up with iPods and massive TVs which don't give a similar quality audio experience. I am sure you will enjoy it so why not subscribe so you will see when new content is released. And good luck with creating your own HiFi story. I wish you well in this endeavour. Vince
Very cool informative video Vince.. I appreciate the efforts put into making this. Thank you so much. John. 👍
Thanks John. That means a lot. Vince
I've put up a video of the vintage Pioneer set up Vince.. Take a look if you please.. John. 👍
@@JD-lk7im Yes I have seen this one. Am now going through your others as well.
@@vinceunlimited Thanks Vince.. More to Come..💜 ✌ John.
I bought a pioneer around 1987/88 think paid 850 pounds. Had six cd player, twin tape, remote control and it sounded awesome. So loud and bassy.
Hi Niks, Thanks for taking a look at my video and for your comment. Six CD capacity, twin tapes and a remote. My system was positively crude compared to your spec. It seems like I was not alone in thinking the Pioneer was a great bit of kit. Underrated at the time.
Walk down memory lane for me. Similar story here in the USA. Stereo systems were the rage. TV' were getting bigger so it was nice to upgrade them too. Since then I've upgraded many many times but still love some of those earlier pieces. Thanks for sharing!
Hi Bob, Thanks for watching my video and for your comments. It seems we have followed similar paths and shared similar thoughts about our HiFi. if you weren't aware I have now posted a second video about the Denon system which replaced my Pioneer set up. Called Mid 1980s Denon Based AV HiFi System on my vinceunlimited channel. Vince
@@vinceunlimitedGreat! I will watch it.
there was a few ways you could connect a TV with no "AV out" to a stereo system, one way was to get a special box that allowed you to "split" RF signals into composite audio and video signals. Also starting in 1984, Pioneer offered a couple of receivers that had direct RF input that split the audio and video signals inside the receiver from an RF signal to a split composite audio and video signal, but boxes that did this has existed since the early 1970s.
Hi, thanks for taking a look at my video and the comment. Presumably, unless you had a component that split the RF into composite video and sound then a coordinated AV system couldn't be achieved. In my case I only had a relatively simple portable colour TV at the time which did not even offer RF throughput which precluded using a 'splitting box', plus I wasn't aware of such an accessory at the time. Learning about these various options becoming available and known about by me is what my HiFi stories are all about. I'm not sure whether you have noticed but I have already released a video about the next stage in my journey wherein I actually created an AV set up even before I knew they existed. Vince
corr they did spend alot of money in the past
there was no stereo like this in my house 100% used gear now i have alot of toys
to play with waiting all the time till i got my place was better for me
love the video
Hi Bob, Thanks for watching my video and for your comment. This was just the start of my HiFi journey. I see you have already commented on my next video. Hope you enjoy the other videos as much. Vince
My parents got the X-550 which we were impressed with so the higher end system must have been very nice. I'm selling the cabinet and speakers on Ebay this week so thanks for making this video showing the brochure which I came across, I remember the components now. The components of our system got replaced just once with some Yamaha kit thought the turntable still works.
Hi Dave, thanks for taking a look at my video and for your comments. Yes, it was very nice. We also upgraded and I am working on the next episode. Subscribe to find out what we changed in the next video. And as a teaser, we did keep a key component. Thanks for sharing your memories. Vince
Completely insane!!! Those prices how possible?? I mean i did similar In the 70's with Yamaha and Advents and only records but US is so much cheaper. You guys are astonishing to me. I know the scale of your purchase
Thanks for your comment
Must have loved music even more than we did and in the 70 's British Rock was at its peak. Our systems were important and Advent Bass was so superior we thought to others but it took 200 watts a channel to hear it. Back in 1976 it became a reality with fairly reasonable power amplifiers. In the USA and by Japan doing the same with giant receivers power was king. But again USA was reasonable. Seems like England as we called it back then was ridiculous
Thanks for your insights Kenneth. I also liked rock music in the seventies. At the time groups were really carving out their individual sounds and many tracks are familiar still today
11:22 Still waiting on part 2! How much longer do you think it will take? I liked and subscribed; I held up *my* end of the deal. :P
Hi Psythik, Thanks for taking a look at my video, for subscribing and liking it. I loved your comment and I WILL bring you the next episode soon. It wouldn't be the vinceunlimited channel if I only concentrated on one subject but you have inspired me to bring the next HiFi story chapter forward. In fairness I was about to do this next anyway it just finding the time. But now I know you are waiting. Your wish will be my command, hopefully within a week. I'm just glad I didn't ask you to hold your breath. Vince
@@vinceunlimited Can't wait; thanks for the reply!
Hi, I hope you have had a chance to check out the next part of my story. Now published. Vince
I like it, subbed.
Thanks for the subscription and comment. Vince
nice video about the past and the components of the time, I still own the following Pioneer speakers, CS 797- CS770- CS 999-CS 757. How many watts do you give them to the CS 757? the bass they gave it? Did you feel the bass? Thanks in advance
Hi Tiger, Thanks for taking a look at my video and for your comments. You sure have a good collection of Pioneer speakers. In the Pioneer set up I had it could deliver a maximum 65w per channel and the speakers handled it well with little distortion except near maximum volume. I'm not sure whether you have seen my follow up video in which I upgraded my system to one with Denon amplification. I kept the great Pioneer speakers and this time they were matched with amplification up to 100w per channel and did a great job in handling this extra power. The real problem was testing them at the higher levels as it became a bit loud to tolerate. All in all I think the Pioneer speakers were very competent and over-engineered for their original design. Vince
@@vinceunlimited Thanks for your time, I'm Italian and I use a translator, I hope my comments are understood. I will watch the video you suggested to me. My speakers that I have listed 797-770-999 have the canvas suspension and bass they give me I don't like and I will have to sell them, The CS 757 have FOAM suspension AND I have yet to test them but the FOAM bass is much more soft even if the foam It is not eternal but like it, so I only keep the CS 757 and the ESB Classic 600. I have read that the CS series For the European market is very bad, while for the Japanese and US market the quality is superior in everything . please I will watch the video you suggested to me👍🏻
@@Tiger-dl1yn Hi, Your translations are fine. I did not realise you were using a translator. Remember the performance levels I experienced were from using brand new speakers and sound sources at the time and my experiences were based on comparisons to other HiFi stuff at the time so my memory may be affected by these factors. However, since then, the design build of a speaker has not altered as radically as other components in a system. Your speakers may be decades old and it would be unsurprising if some of the materials used had not shown some effects of wear. Vince
@@vinceunlimited Hi Vince, I'm not talking about wear, but about the type of bass, in this case due to the canvas suspension that responds with a bass of the type (dun dun) while the bass of the woofers with FOAM suspension Like the 757 Which give a soft bass like (BUM BUM) That's why I want to sell the others
@@Tiger-dl1yn Soft bass is easier on the ear providing it is not muddied or muffled and that is dependent on the speaker construction as well as the ability of the amplification to control it. As you have discovered even similar products may not perform the same so testing them out and finding what suits you best is one of the pleasures of HiFi discovery
The 70s was the glory time for Pioneer and other big brands from Japan. The 80s was a time of cheapening and miniaturization... discreet circuitry replaced with ICs, flimsy build and power supplies the size of walnuts. Metal, glass and wood were replaced with plastic and more plastic. 1980 was the downward turning point for most Japanese stereo makers although signs of cost cutting had already begun in the late 70s.
Hi socksumi, Thanks for checking out my video and for adding a comment. I think you might be right in identifying that the late seventies and early eighties were a great quality point in HiFi technology although later IC technology did bring a theoretical new dimension in sound even if unit build quality was diminishing. Serious users had to move upmarket to chase the quality that mass production was leaving behind. Vince
Wasn't there a headphone socket on the front bottom right of the television ? I am absolutely sure plugging in a headphone jack going into RCA , connected to the Auxiliary, would've worked !
Hi Magnus, thanks for taking a look at my video and your insightful comment. I think you are right. The photographs I have show this. At the time I would not have thought of this option because I saw it as 'just' a headphone socket. It was my first set up so I was still learning the abilities of connections etc. Furthermore, had I thought about this, the lead would have protruded from the front and therefore been aesthetically unpleasant. As I didn't try this I will never know how this would have worked, for instance in controlling the volume [presumably a combination of the TV controls and amplifier setting] and whether syncing between picture and sound could be aligned. Vince
Isn't it weird how everything got replaced by a Bluetooth speaker when I was a kid bookshelf systems were everywhere now they seem to be nowhere Alexa have taken over
We have greater choice of content but less choice on what we can play it on
what was doing the timer?
Hi Cyberbarbaro, Thanks for taking a look at my video and your question. The timer was a separate component included as it was a part of the whole set but really served a limited function. It has a clock display function and could be used as a timer either to automatically switch the system on or off but just as a switch. So you could set a wake up time so the system would start up in the morning playing the tuner [radio] or alternatively act as an automatic shut down when listening at night. I was always sceptical about using this because as far as I could tell it would be an uncontrolled power off so if you were in the middle of a cassette playing through the amplifier then it would act as it the power sockets were just switched off. Whether it was more sophisticated than that I'm not sure. In any case I didn't need the wake or sleep function as it was in a living room rather than bedroom so it was just really an overpriced clock and if I wanted to know the time I would just check my wristwatch. Vince
this is known by the X series that had comercials on tv, some had 79 slim amplifiers in brushed aluminium, mine had the CT-520 wich i still have it and two years ago i install new betls and seemed new again ,i have cassettes recorded there and they do sound good but in this deck they sound worse ,today using a CT-959(1990) they sound much better and try to re-record a cassette and it still records perfectelly but sounds much better in a more recent deck, nothing related with the azimuth , just the fact that they record better than they play and for the years and heavy use it still operates at 100% level with only new belts
Hi Rui, Thanks for watching my video and adding a comment. Fascinating to hear about someone still using components originally produced so long ago
vintage technology are the best why ?
it made with good materials,
made to work all life,
have manual to repair and can find parts to fix it,
after long time it made still works,
i buy only vintage technology,
this days we have only chinese garbage from china, and everything is made in china,
love vintage technology
Hi, Thanks for taking a look at my video and your thoughts on vintage equipment. Of course when I had this system it was far from vintage. In fact all brand new. I agree that some things from this period have stood the test of time and some comments I have received confirm this. I understand what you mean by the detriment to build quality from mass market supply during the early 2000s due to customers preferring cheapness over quality but thankfully there are still some manufacturers that are producing good components with high grade materials and craftsmanship. But vintage stuff does still compete when it comes to style and ambiance. Vince
6:55 low 38 khz bass???? Don't you mean 38 hz?
Hi, Well spotted. Yes it was specified at 38Hz to 20,000Hz. 38kHz would be inaudible unless you were a dog. But conversely they couldn't appreciate the low bass level so we win I guess. I did redeem myself at around the 10min 30s mark when I was advising the cost of the system wherein I noted the 38 to 20,000Hz range. Thanks for watching my video and your comment. Vince
4 x inflation. Thats terrible. Over time we all are really being ripped off. Great stereo system though.
Hi Summer, thanks for watching my video and your comments. Thankfully inflation on product prices is usually linked to increased wages, even if it doesn't always seem so. It was a great stereo system. Vince
👍
Pourquoi la pioneer a totalement disparu dans le monde de hifi
Bonjour Alain, Merci pour votre commentaire. Pioneer fabrique toujours du Hi-Fi qui est disponible, y compris les produits Home Cinema, la mise en réseau, les composants individuels et les haut-parleurs. Bien que ce ne soit plus aussi courant qu'avant. Vince
Merci
De rien