F-35A Lightning II Demo 2019 Melbourne Air Show

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • 2019 Melbourne Air and Space Air Show
    Melbourne, Florida. Saturday March 30th, 2019.
    My trip out east was worth it. Watch as Capt. Andrew Dojo Olson performs the 1st North American F-35A Lightning II aerobatic demonstration. You’ll also see the USAF Heritage Flight formation with a F-35A, A-1 Skyraider & P-51 Mustang.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,3 тис.

  • @natedaninja3171
    @natedaninja3171 3 роки тому +56

    So nobody is gonna talk about the crew greeting the pilot at the start?

    • @thedankfloof3682
      @thedankfloof3682 2 роки тому +4

      Dude, I know, I had to watch all of their slap ups multiple times.

    • @thedankfloof3682
      @thedankfloof3682 2 роки тому +2

      @@MANAMAN005 Thank you sir.

    • @stevenoboyle
      @stevenoboyle 2 роки тому +1

      Honestly I feel like it was a “aight go fly watch out for death around the corner tho”

    • @paulblack5883
      @paulblack5883 Рік тому

      Nobody really cares about the crew chiefs facing movements...just get the bird up already

  • @phillipgraves4721
    @phillipgraves4721 3 роки тому +48

    The sound of these jets just gives you Goosebumps. So very impressive

  • @seanbarrett3744
    @seanbarrett3744 3 роки тому +24

    Got to see a F-35 demo 2 years ago at The Rhode Island air show. It was so surreal seeing how quick and maneuverable it was .

    • @angelinasa1031
      @angelinasa1031 3 роки тому +1

      Ah, same! Was it the Quonset Air Show?

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott 5 років тому +55

    15:10 The formation flying of the F-35A, A-1 Skyraider and P-51 is a highlight.

    • @cosmicskies6219
      @cosmicskies6219 3 роки тому +4

      It really gives you a sense of scale

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott 3 роки тому +4

      @@cosmicskies6219 Boeing's museum in Seattle had some WWII fighters alongside an F-15. The F-15 dwarfed the WWII aircraft. Even more dramatic was the F-15 versus a Lockheed SR-71 in the museum. The SR-71 is friggin' HUGE.

    • @siplt2946
      @siplt2946 3 роки тому +1

      There are 2 imposters among use

  • @jay6817
    @jay6817 5 років тому +18

    I saw this on the day, live. Nothing beats seeing it there in person. Unless you're in the cockpit of course. Amazing machine.

  • @thomasandersen1784
    @thomasandersen1784 4 роки тому +25

    OMG! I could watch (and hear) this beauty all day loooong..!! What a plain and what a pilot. Can't wait to get those 37 pieces of the F-35A for the Danish Air Force :-) Cheers from Denmark

    • @f35-lightningii20
      @f35-lightningii20 3 роки тому

      @Sean Yee And they buys them even more. 190+ i think and both A and B variants and they stopped grounding it long time ago. Stop spreading lies with your 2 weeks years old comment. Oh, the evident is already there, too. It's the pilot fault. Their pilot was tired even before he fly F35. Also, more than 600 F35 are now flying in this planet now in this year 2021. Go sucks your J20 and Su57. Looks like no one want to buys them.

    • @trenken
      @trenken 2 роки тому

      Pilots awesome. This plane absolutely has not been awesome. It has been deemed a failure by the US government due to its poor maneuverability and bloated costs. Unfortunately we are neck deep in the investment on it so we are stuck with it for decades.

    • @forzaelite1248
      @forzaelite1248 2 роки тому +2

      @@trenken I don't see how you can say that, its never been claimed a failure by anyone in govt. 2400 aircraft sold, cheaper than most competitive 4+ gen fighters while exceeding most if not all their capabilities, plenty of maneuverability if you've seen airshow footage or understand energy management and where it's used and why; its a technological marvel. It's also been a tech headache but no one could've predicted how far technology would advance and complicate in 10-15 years. It's more expensive than some predecessors but vastly more capable and several other countries think so; I advise you research it thoroughly.

    • @trenken
      @trenken 2 роки тому

      @@forzaelite1248 the contract was canceled many years early because the maneuverability is not up to par. They didnt have a choice to buy many of them. What else was there? They don’t exactly have many dealers out there for new jets. Gotta kinda take what you can get. But this plane really has not been great.

    • @forzaelite1248
      @forzaelite1248 2 роки тому +3

      @@trenken Contract cancelled from who? The F35's development hasn't been cancelled, only halted after chinese parts were found in it. No country has made a bid on a fighter due to maneuverability on its own because its hardly relevant anymore, nor have any cancelled their F35 orders. I'm gonna need a couple of sources for your claims because quick google searches show info that largely disagrees with what you're saying.

  • @blm2357
    @blm2357 4 роки тому +34

    Oh man I got chills seeing that thing in action. I could only imagine being able to FEEL it fly by. Wow! What a marvel!

    • @Gsmooth10455
      @Gsmooth10455 4 роки тому +5

      I saw it live at the New York Air Show in August and the sound was incredible. You could feel it pulsating through your body when it went by.

    • @greyman662
      @greyman662 4 роки тому

      FIELDING MELISH That afterburner is unreal completely isolates it’s sound from anything else

  • @quynhquytran7850
    @quynhquytran7850 4 роки тому +72

    0:03 Hiphop never die!🤣🤣

  • @kirra77
    @kirra77 3 роки тому +17

    What ppl don’t understand, is what the pilot
    and his body is going through, it’s more stress and g’ forces than you can imagine. He’s literally fighting to stay conscious.

    • @จํานงค์อินทรสันติ
    • @CloneDAnon
      @CloneDAnon 3 роки тому

      Its only 4G's...since they are not allowed more on F35.

    • @mobius7089
      @mobius7089 3 роки тому

      @@CloneDAnon lmao, at 7:47 I guarantee that is no less than 6G

    • @CloneDAnon
      @CloneDAnon 3 роки тому

      ​@@mobius7089 ...err..."wow"? The most basic loop, i would not be so sure it was 6G. Even it it were for a second or two, it should have done some sustained 7.5G moves at very least or even 9G moves just for the show and to prove that it actually withstand it.

  • @myhometechguy
    @myhometechguy 5 років тому +13

    Just looking at the fit and finish of the F-35 tells a lot. It is the most advanced technological machine in its designed, structure, and electronics. Its taken everything we have leaned from previous fighters and taken it to the next level. This includes the F-22. I believe the F-35 is superior in every way except power, speed, and very low speed maneuvering. This only makes sense being that the F-35 is made by the same manufacturer as the F-22 with 10 years newer technology. The difficulties and delays the program has experience are expected when you are pushing the technology to the limits. All of the hard work is paying off and its only going to get better over time. I believe that our adversaries are way behind us. Even though they have produced fighter that look very similar I don't believe they are nearly as capable. They are likely lacking far behind in the most important strength and that is the avionics. This is evidenced by their inability to produce super cruise capable engines to date, something we have achieved in 1997. Considering all of its capabilities it is a tremendous value when compared to legacy fighters.

    • @invoker123
      @invoker123 Рік тому

      If you think fat Amy is better than the raptor than u don’t deserve to be talking about anything that requires basic iq

  • @jongreen4893
    @jongreen4893 4 роки тому +20

    just the F35 at Nellis last weekend. The sound is unlike anything! Sound waves go right thru your body!

    • @babasdadda
      @babasdadda 3 роки тому

      Any idea of how many decibels we’re talking about?

    • @abdulazizibrahim1556
      @abdulazizibrahim1556 2 роки тому +1

      Its not about aircraft itself its about the engine you talking about..the engine like other aircraft actually.

  • @Tmac34
    @Tmac34 4 роки тому +74

    10:42 it becomes a blur I am in love with this air craft

    • @skelolion6939
      @skelolion6939 4 роки тому

      Turned into halo 2 graphics for a little

    • @mrt6934
      @mrt6934 4 роки тому +2

      My boi its no blur it’s the pure speed of that jet

    • @cosmicskies6219
      @cosmicskies6219 3 роки тому

      That is literally condensing air just from turning.

    • @QueenDaenerysTargaryen
      @QueenDaenerysTargaryen 3 роки тому

      Now that is very fast⚡

  • @Wolfoe-ex2jj
    @Wolfoe-ex2jj 5 років тому +144

    I was a little skeptical at first, like many were, however I've definitely come to appreciate the f35 just as much as jets like the raptor and eagle.

    • @justacommenter4361
      @justacommenter4361 5 років тому +8

      I just think with the cost of the F-35 we may as well have the Raptor which is much more capable. NOW I do love the Eagle and it is still a pretty awesome aircraft. F-35 my verdict is not in due to the cost for what we get in capabilities.

    • @mtumeumrani376
      @mtumeumrani376 5 років тому +4

      If the F-14 had as much funding and development as this thing, they would be flying into space.

    • @Wolfoe-ex2jj
      @Wolfoe-ex2jj 5 років тому +3

      Justa Commenter Undoubtedly the cost may not be worth the jet we got, only time will tell though.

    • @vburd62
      @vburd62 5 років тому +26

      what are you talking about?..the cost of the plane has come way down per unit and this plane can do almost anything the raptor can and just about all of what an eagle can and more.

    • @Barefoot433
      @Barefoot433 5 років тому +13

      @@justacommenter4361 But we're going to sell a whole lot of Lighting IIs to our solid allies, that offsets a lot of cost. We will have many as well. With each added jet the unit cost decreases to a tolerable average cost per plane. The Raptor is a USAF only flagship, less than 200 made but they all stay with the Air Force.

  • @patricks_music
    @patricks_music 3 роки тому +65

    I can’t begin to imagine the engineering required for this. Such an incredible aircraft
    Also, the pilot’s helmet lets them see through the plane like it isn’t even there!

  • @thefarmingnurse
    @thefarmingnurse 5 років тому +59

    Saw this puppy live in 2017...OMG it nearly blew me over it was so powerful on its afterburner turns. If you’ve ever seen a harrier live you know how loud it is. The F-35? A bit louder still

    • @cadeskylighter1337
      @cadeskylighter1337 4 роки тому +4

      Saw a Harrier at the 2009 Quad City Air Show. Boy, that thing is one loud bird!

    • @jasons2562
      @jasons2562 4 роки тому +3

      Yeah the F 35 engine is so huge and powerful

    • @nextgenpsychos1016
      @nextgenpsychos1016 4 роки тому +2

      It broke my Mic I have a video of it on my channel

    • @andrewmoore7022
      @andrewmoore7022 3 роки тому

      Yeah the f135 engine is a beast in size, noise and performance.

  • @ГочагНаби
    @ГочагНаби 3 роки тому +7

    Супер машина👍🇦🇲👍

  • @snowmonkey8154
    @snowmonkey8154 5 років тому +244

    Apparently the airplane requires an IKEA wrench to finish assembly before engine start.

    • @p1colo79
      @p1colo79 5 років тому +21

      Yeah, thats what all fighter planes do you snob.

    • @jcjrdigital5570
      @jcjrdigital5570 4 роки тому +19

      @@p1colo79 it was clearly a joke, lighten up friend.

    • @NinjaofApathy
      @NinjaofApathy 4 роки тому +6

      I was wondering this - how is that panel secured? It can't possibly be only two short turns?

    • @allistairneil8968
      @allistairneil8968 4 роки тому +8

      The whole plane is available from IKEA, that's why the pilot's name is Dojo OLSEN.

    • @allistairneil8968
      @allistairneil8968 4 роки тому +2

      @@p1colo79 Dork

  • @twincamism
    @twincamism 5 років тому +11

    Блеать я думал он хотя бы вертикально взлетит, столько понтов.....

    • @ОлегОлег-т4с
      @ОлегОлег-т4с 5 років тому

      Вот лада она взлетает! Кури дальше приму!

  • @makisadventure
    @makisadventure 5 років тому +29

    Amazing sound beats your heart!!!!!! A big thanks to all pilots!!!!!

  • @cmac9029
    @cmac9029 3 роки тому +22

    Seeing this machine do the manovre @11:15 really made me have more respect for it. Not just because it can do it, but with the ease that it powered out and the very short distance it was accomplished in was really something

    • @jordonstalder8404
      @jordonstalder8404 2 роки тому

      It's thrust to weight ratio is retarded.... It's like 45,000lbs of thrust coming out that 1 engine pushing a damn paperclip loll
      60:1 kill ratio... Wouldn't any part of this aircraft

    • @wruenvadam
      @wruenvadam 2 роки тому +2

      I like to think that it is the evolved offspring of an F/A-18 and F-16 with the F-22 teaching it how to be stealthy. High alpha, high turn rate fighter with stealth capabilities and still a good payload capacity with ridiculous power to weight. It is an amazingly capable aircraft, and being able to do what it does with no thrust vectoring is just a testament to its engineering. People that say it sucks because it isn't as fast as other fighters don't know just how little combat happens above Mach 1, and what really matters in a fight is how quickly you can accelerate rather than your top speed.

    • @CoffeeMonster12
      @CoffeeMonster12 2 роки тому +1

      @@wruenvadam Well the F-35 is definetly not as fast or agile as older jets, but the fact that those jets might not know the F-35 os there before they get hit is the real game changer.

  • @gregbuck701
    @gregbuck701 5 років тому +22

    F15, 16, 18, etc., are in close badass knife fighters, F35 is a in close, invisible knife fighter. All have their mission.

    • @mikerice5298
      @mikerice5298 5 років тому

      3 UFOs VS 10 F-16 jan 8 2008 in TX

    • @giggling_boatswain
      @giggling_boatswain 5 років тому +1

      Well, now just need a training battle with the SU-35 or SU-57. Russians every year offer to take part in their international war games AVIA DARTS. US refuses every year.

    • @frankcrawford416
      @frankcrawford416 5 років тому

      @Buro Dackel I won't even reply.

    • @fluffdummy7532
      @fluffdummy7532 5 років тому +1

      ​@Buro Dackel while long wave radar can *detect* stealth fighters, it will struggle to track them and certainly won't be getting anything close to a weapons lock. Meanwhile, the F-35 can launch a missile which will take out the radar site from 50+ miles away.

    • @frankcrawford416
      @frankcrawford416 5 років тому

      @@giggling_boatswain Why would we do something so stupid as to train Russians to fight our aircraft. They are not allies at all.

  • @galactic-visitoretxavarria1674
    @galactic-visitoretxavarria1674 5 років тому +20

    Wow!!!!.What a absolutely impressive demo!!!.From Both!!!.Pilot & Aircraft`s Performance !!.

  • @Mangoclay
    @Mangoclay 5 років тому +33

    Please tell me the F-35 is doing the fly over the F1 next year

    • @dustinrohr5735
      @dustinrohr5735 5 років тому

      I heard this was the last air show for melbourne fl ever again

    • @joshcallaghan9432
      @joshcallaghan9432 5 років тому

      It'll be U/S

    • @woopimagpie
      @woopimagpie 5 років тому

      @@notrocketscience1950 Australia is in the process of buying a bunch of F-35s so it's totally possible (likely even) that an F-35 will do a flyover at the F1.

  • @joesinegal8167
    @joesinegal8167 4 роки тому +2

    I've Heard That The F-35 Doesn't Perform Very Well. Watching This Tells Me That You Shouldn't Believe Everything You Hear!
    This Pilot Shattered All Of The Doubts In My Mind! With It's Advanced Stealth Technologies, All Enemies Have Been Put On Notice!
    This Pilot Is Brilliant! ✌️👍✌️

  • @JohnPaul-gh1fh
    @JohnPaul-gh1fh 5 років тому +22

    First manned combat drone in military history....

  • @bereantrb
    @bereantrb 5 років тому +28

    21:50 Pilot: "It's a whole generational leap of technology forward. I flew the F-15 prior to this and, dude, it's a whole [step change further than that]... This is the futue of the Air Force right here."

    • @Knightfire66
      @Knightfire66 5 років тому

      well thats not 100% right. the f16 is upgraded and full with the new tech too... the new f16s are nearly as good as that BUT they are a lot cheaper

    • @dodododes
      @dodododes 5 років тому

      they are paid to say it , surprise imbecile

    • @eddgong
      @eddgong 5 років тому +5

      @llamaha my former boss also an f15 aggressor sqd pilot he tells me the same and then some and he and I are in private so you can take your opinion and stow it elsewhere

    • @andrewmoore7022
      @andrewmoore7022 3 роки тому +1

      @@Knightfire66 both the f-35A and F16 block 70 currently cost around 80 million

  • @archiecunningham3734
    @archiecunningham3734 4 роки тому +34

    I just saw this awesome plane last month for the first time and I am so impressed with it. An instant fan. Glad it’s ours!,,,,

    • @tonyhero1628
      @tonyhero1628 3 роки тому +2

      hahahahahaaaaha good one thanks

  • @draperdarius1604
    @draperdarius1604 3 роки тому +8

    Thanks for sharing ...What an amazing machine ...The capabilities and performance beats everything I've ever seen ... Astonishing can't wait to see it this year !!!

  • @ElwynR
    @ElwynR 5 років тому +32

    It's one display I'd love to see this year!! But wont happen unfortunatly so I'll have to keep watching you'r video's instead!! which isnt a bad thing 😊😊

    • @anthonysaponaro6318
      @anthonysaponaro6318 5 років тому +1

      Me as well , watching the F-22 was impressive as all hell a few years ago this I am dying to see live

    • @tilingaseme773
      @tilingaseme773 4 роки тому +1

      Pure mamaditas these nacos with their flying torch jejeje

  • @philzolth4710
    @philzolth4710 5 років тому +29

    That looks scary the enemy might die of fright before a shot is fired

    • @p1colo79
      @p1colo79 5 років тому +2

      Or they launch Stingers and destroy it...lol

    • @everydaycook8622
      @everydaycook8622 4 роки тому +1

      but not for SU-57 pilot

    • @mpouli101able
      @mpouli101able 4 роки тому +1

      Everyday Cook is there even such a thing?

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 4 роки тому +4

      @@p1colo79 It would take a lucky shot. Stingers work great on slow moving helicopters.

    • @viruspter1dactl
      @viruspter1dactl 4 роки тому +1

      Before they even see it lmao

  • @scraverX
    @scraverX 5 років тому +45

    Flying in formation with Propeller aircraft is pretty impressive.

    • @mingchen9024
      @mingchen9024 5 років тому +1

      👍👍👍👍👍

    • @Rhoadie1
      @Rhoadie1 5 років тому +1

      Not really from a physics standpoint..... Were you talking about nostalgia? Otherwise, its just planes flying in formation. Same rules apply no offense.

    • @scraverX
      @scraverX 5 років тому +10

      @@Rhoadie1 Yes from a physics standpoint. Most jet aircraft of previous generations wouldn't generate enough lift at such a low altitude and speed, resulting in the jet falling out of the sky. Typically the top speed of a P51 is below the stall speed of a jet.

    • @Douganchesner
      @Douganchesner 5 років тому +2

      Ummm. You think a fighter jet’s stall speed is 400+ mph? Most fighter jets can fly fine at 200mph which is far below what a P-51 can do

    • @scraverX
      @scraverX 5 років тому

      @@Douganchesner We don't know what the F-35's stall speed is, further landing speed is entirely different to maintaining flight at low altitude without stalling. Landing speed for most fighter jets is in the range of 130 - 140 knots or 155 - 160 mph and that F-35 isn't configured for landing, the gear is up.

  • @HusseinAli-hj6kq
    @HusseinAli-hj6kq 4 роки тому +1

    God bless America ✌

  • @DG121480
    @DG121480 5 років тому +15

    Definitely didn't look too happy flying with the old ladies. She wants to go fast!

    • @Enonymouse_
      @Enonymouse_ 5 років тому

      Turbine jets flying with prop driven aircraft sometimes have to fly at near stall speeds to let the old ladies keep up with them.

  • @BlazerDuck07
    @BlazerDuck07 5 років тому +32

    F-22 is still King. Nice demo though, especially that controlled flat spin/stall maneuver @ 11:30.

    • @yfelwulf
      @yfelwulf 5 років тому +4

      F22 has never worked since it was built current price operating cost 678 million per unit. It can't be fully serviced outside the JEW SA and needs 40 man hours of service for every hour of flight its OK its down from 50 hours. Many werd damaged some destroyed at their US base in a Storm as they had no pilots to fly them to a safe field. GO Team Jewmerica.

    • @australian3308
      @australian3308 5 років тому

      @@yfelwulf F-22 doesn't even make 50% operational readiness - WAY short of the 80% that is required! F-35 isn't even making 60%. F-35 literally can be hacked from the ground (multitude of cyber issues with it), and it's gun is so inaccurate as to be worthless.
      F-22 sheds it's supposed "stealth" coating rather easily (hence for sub-50% op status for the most part) - I believe the same issues exist for the F-35 also.
      F-22 withdrawn from operational theatres and sent home. Israeli F-35 barred by the Pentagoon from flying over Syria.

    • @tweedy4sg
      @tweedy4sg 5 років тому

      And you're impressed with such mickey mouse post-stall maneuvre ?? LOL...
      Watch this and try beating the stall maneuvers from a plane with tech from at least 20 yrs earlier, ua-cam.com/video/2IFUxLhW4Sk/v-deo.html (@ 3:08)

    • @f35-lightningii20
      @f35-lightningii20 5 років тому +1

      @@yfelwulf Remember, 200 russian merceneries that got bombed by F-22s in the middle east, boy. Lol.

    • @predatorjunglehunter7332
      @predatorjunglehunter7332 5 років тому

      Neightrix Prime he believes everything what he reads in sputniknews or RT, forgive him, his parents are probably siblings

  • @SilentCougar
    @SilentCougar 5 років тому +22

    Great camera work keeping the focus locked. A well-designed aircraft and one that showed just what it can do maneuver wise, especially in the hands of obviously intelligent pilots.

  • @lr2127
    @lr2127 4 роки тому +12

    So glad I get to see these almost every day

  • @andrewolsen2988
    @andrewolsen2988 5 років тому +4

    F-35 Manoeuverabilty Secrets: ua-cam.com/video/Qam6zbFCIfQ/v-deo.html

  • @ghostmourn
    @ghostmourn 5 років тому +83

    I passed out from the G's just watching this.

    • @Karl-Benny
      @Karl-Benny 4 роки тому

      do they pull G at that slow speed

    • @vermin1970
      @vermin1970 4 роки тому +2

      Karl-benny johansson everything they are doing is at slow speed, it’s an air show, they aren’t allowed to exceed Mach 1 😂

    • @androtestxxx2306
      @androtestxxx2306 4 роки тому +2

      @@vermin1970 g-force is not about supersonic flight it's about change on momentum (speed and agular velocity)

    • @petermackenzie3494
      @petermackenzie3494 4 роки тому

      Very good excellent!

    • @petermackenzie3494
      @petermackenzie3494 4 роки тому

      @@androtestxxx2306
      Good

  • @stevenwestfall7638
    @stevenwestfall7638 5 років тому +57

    These displays are best seen on a high humidity day. Love the vapor that comes off of them.

    • @angelamonteleone510
      @angelamonteleone510 5 років тому +1

      Back in the early 1980’s in the eastern-med were humidity is low, a F14 Tomcat could compress enough air as it went balistic at super-sonic speed to turn into vapor. Supersonic fly-by you won’t see it on UA-cam.

    • @punjabianzzzchannel6166
      @punjabianzzzchannel6166 5 років тому

      khani D

  • @mumugeschoepf
    @mumugeschoepf 5 років тому +9

    Wonderful, greetings from Germany

  • @UncleRyansToyReviews
    @UncleRyansToyReviews 5 років тому +21

    I love this jet!

  • @beautifulportland9592
    @beautifulportland9592 5 років тому +8

    Sweet! Glad we are building over 700 more of these bad boys . . love that reverse at 17:20 . . + more F-15X's . . . . another Bas A$$ . . . .

    • @AmbientMorality
      @AmbientMorality 5 років тому

      I like how the elevator wobbles a bit at the end of that sharp turn, dampening it perfectly. There's some tight computer control keeping that stable... I'm always fascinated by that side of fighter design.

  • @RPj1956
    @RPj1956 5 років тому +21

    Ok... This thing is what you get when you mate a Harrier with an F-16 on ROIDS! Whatever wrinkles this bird had look pretty ironed out to me.

  • @United1158
    @United1158 4 роки тому +26

    JUST LISTENED TO THIS WITH HEADPHONES ON FULL VOLUME AND IT SOUNDS AWESOME

    • @JohnSmith-wd9rc
      @JohnSmith-wd9rc 4 роки тому +2

      I saw the F35 demo at the Cleveland Air Show, my God, the sound. The loudest single engine I have ever heard.

  • @jammingmartin2661
    @jammingmartin2661 5 років тому +34

    amazing tech. wright brothers would be impressed. another 100 years this will be the wright Brothers plane. Great video well done.

    • @dota2playersenjehang703
      @dota2playersenjehang703 5 років тому +1

      The Reptilians are proud that yanks using their techs not bad.

    • @dreamtree1510
      @dreamtree1510 4 роки тому

      @@dota2playersenjehang703 What?

    • @grindspiritreal
      @grindspiritreal 4 роки тому

      Santos Dumont

    • @antoniocampos8674
      @antoniocampos8674 4 роки тому

      jamming Martin Santos Dumont.

    • @BlindingGlow
      @BlindingGlow 4 роки тому +1

      @@grindspiritreal What about him? The Wright brothers invented the airplane a couple years before Dumont. And I don't want to hear that lame Brazilian excuse that the "catapult assisted takeoff" disqualifies them. Does that mean the F35-C is not a real airplane then?

  • @batmandeltaforce
    @batmandeltaforce 5 років тому +114

    Cool to watch the designers and builders of this amazing fighter endure all the criticism and dissing, while laughing under their breath, KNOWING what this thing can do:) Damn good job folks:)

    • @mfree80286
      @mfree80286 5 років тому +26

      It's in our favor to have everyone underestimating our aircraft. "But the F-35 fails to be able to bleeblah!" Engineer: "No, actually that's not a pro...." Sigint interrupts "... something we're working on resolving in the third software revisions." Siginti to engineer, whispered: "Dude, if everyone outside, you know, potential enemies, thinks our main aircraft can't chooch, let them think it can't chooch until AFTER we chooch with them!"

    • @Sunshine14440
      @Sunshine14440 5 років тому +5

      ua-cam.com/video/4EmHoRGm4_w/v-deo.html

    • @林敏香
      @林敏香 5 років тому

      @@mfree80286 (· CNN Vu

    • @dontbetonit813
      @dontbetonit813 5 років тому +3

      It is a streach calling this a fighter. It is a very good air to ground aircraft but air to air it is a sitting duck.

    • @batmandeltaforce
      @batmandeltaforce 5 років тому +11

      @@dontbetonit813 hahahaha silly:)

  • @glennystt918
    @glennystt918 5 років тому +12

    Oh to be the pilot!!!!!
    Awesome thanks for sharing

  • @videowilliams
    @videowilliams 3 роки тому +2

    Love your angle on that low speed tail stand at 13:03!

  • @TXAVGEEK
    @TXAVGEEK 5 років тому +27

    Hell yes!! Excellent video man!

  • @garwhittaker3743
    @garwhittaker3743 5 років тому +36

    It's all about sensors and missiles now and this plane is far ahead .....F-35 Royal Navy 👍💪💪👍
    P'S That mustang is beautiful. ..

    • @marc9080
      @marc9080 5 років тому

      the F-35 Royal Navy CHEAPER? yes it's true

    • @garwhittaker3743
      @garwhittaker3743 5 років тому

      @@marc9080 cheaper eh ?

    • @thesauce7783
      @thesauce7783 5 років тому

      Ahh tastes great, more wars.. Guys, idc how cool that plane looks, there is nothing great about war and weapons of mass destruction. Humanity should boycott wars, and fight for rights instead before we lose all of em.. While they take our tax for wars they lie us into, that they created and funded for.. Governments don't support their people folks.. Never have and never will. It's time to wake up like France yellow vest movement, and like Iceland in 2010.

    • @garwhittaker3743
      @garwhittaker3743 5 років тому

      @@thesauce7783 Think you on the wrong video my friend ,You have to be able to defend yourself.

    • @thesauce7783
      @thesauce7783 5 років тому

      You have to defend yourself from the Federal Corporation ''government'' that's CIA (corporate department) was abducting and torturing THOUSANDS of US citizens for mind control research called Mk Ultra for DECADES, even during JFK said he'd destroy the CIA into a million pieces. But if Americans don't fight harder for their gun rights, you will lose them from this tyrannical gov.
      As the bible says in Ephesians 6:12: For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
      They lied about the torpedo attack to get us into Vietnam. They lied to get us into Iraq. They have military civilian torture prisons in the middle east. They guard poppy fields for big Pharma, they take land and resources, they produce weapons of mass destruction to sell for profit, while wars are manufactured to sell weapons. THEY PROFIT FROM WAR. THEY, are the bankers that own the Federal Reserve and print the US dollar, control world economies and wars.
      I'm a Finnish/American, living in Finland and i'm a Finnish combat medic, but i'd never fight and die for my country, or any government. I'd protect my family with my life, not my government rich psychopaths. This may not be your everyday discussion, but it's important to wake up. God bless you all, i hope you wake up to the reality.

  • @АндрейКарташ-ъ6р
    @АндрейКарташ-ъ6р 5 років тому +9

    Этот "бочонок" ещё и летает? Удивительно некрасивый самолёт..

  • @grabir01
    @grabir01 4 роки тому +1

    Interesting seeing it at Mach 1 not having to use after burner. See 9:06

    • @kamp.4466
      @kamp.4466 4 роки тому

      Not quite mach 1 (they say it's mach .95) but yeah, you're right. With no added drag on the outside of the aircraft and that big of an engine, she gets pretty close.

  • @tedwootton732
    @tedwootton732 5 років тому +7

    They kept the plane at 7.3 g max load out of 9 g capable they most have turned the g load up

    • @hoghogwild
      @hoghogwild 5 років тому +5

      A "loadout" is typically the weapons load a jet carries, a "max loadout" is the maximum weapons/fuel load a jet can carry, though this is more commonly referred to as the planes Maximum Take Off Weight. It's common in the modern era for the jet to be able to "out-G" the meat in the seat. The F-35 is a multi-role fighter, not an air-superiority fighter like the F-22 is. There are rumblings that some of the early F-35s might be out of flight hours before 2027. The lower the G limit, the longer the flight hours on the airframe. Even the good old F-14s could lay down 9 g's all day, but were limited to 7.5 for airframe longevity.

  • @ryankoehn74
    @ryankoehn74 5 років тому +79

    Before the video i started laughing at the accidental apple handshake hahaha. Gets me every time

  • @7repair7
    @7repair7 5 років тому +6

    HELLO "THIS USA NAVY!" !! THE BEST.

    • @Gsmooth10455
      @Gsmooth10455 5 років тому +2

      Sorry to disappoint you but that's not a Naval plane. That was the F-35A, which is the Air Force version. The Naval version is the F-35C, which is not capable of doing 9G maneuvers.

    • @7repair7
      @7repair7 5 років тому

      FIELDING MELISH I don’t understand! Who is disappointed?

    • @Gsmooth10455
      @Gsmooth10455 5 років тому +2

      @@7repair7 Maybe I should say "sorry to burst your bubble", because you think that's a Naval plane. "THIS USA NAVY". Why would you think that the F-35A is a Navy plane. You can clearly see that its an F-35A, not an F-35C.

    • @7repair7
      @7repair7 5 років тому +2

      FIELDING MELISH
      I see but I love it thanks bro! Take care.

    • @Gsmooth10455
      @Gsmooth10455 5 років тому +1

      @@7repair7 Take care as well my friend.

  • @vampiro4236
    @vampiro4236 3 роки тому +2

    Everyone who still says the F-35 is crap/a bad dogfighter should read the most recent (non-classiffied ) stats and capabilities of this plane and then watch this demo. An F-16 can't pull some of those reversals and that thing is a little corvette!

  • @Knightstruth
    @Knightstruth 5 років тому +16

    Wow, that F-35 is agile.

    • @Balnazzardi
      @Balnazzardi 5 років тому +5

      Not as agile as Typhoon for example....but then again F-35 ofc has the advantage in stealth capabilities. at the end of the day, that is what counts more in real scenario against other fighters, not so much about the agility. Dogfights against other fighters just wouldnt happen, it would be all about long range combat and which one detects the other first and is able to fire the missiles and destroy the other fighter first from long range.

    • @frankcrawford416
      @frankcrawford416 5 років тому +2

      @@Balnazzardi It is much more agile.

    • @xmeda
      @xmeda 5 років тому +1

      In jammed environment you can fire as many missiles as you want, and then guy with cannon eats you for breakfast.

    • @reid1283
      @reid1283 4 роки тому +3

      xmeda
      The F-35A has more cannon ammo than the Eurofighter. Your point? You can’t just power your way through any missile, otherwise the EA-18 wouldn’t need escorts

  • @juliesaballa9906
    @juliesaballa9906 5 років тому +8

    thank you! striking like a distant thunder, let's do it again straight up!

  • @juliesaballa9906
    @juliesaballa9906 5 років тому +30

    just love how that baby sound on the ground! whew!

  • @chrismac2234
    @chrismac2234 5 років тому +59

    There was immense criticism of the harrier when it was new too. The Falklands changed that.

    • @johnnyboythepilot4098
      @johnnyboythepilot4098 5 років тому +25

      Yup. Same thing with the P-51, Spitfire, P-38, F-4, F-14, F-15, F-16, F/A-18, Su-27, F-22, etc... Every legendary fighter in the past had a design flaw or was heavily panned/criticized before it could really prove itself at some point.

    • @ipayman5217
      @ipayman5217 4 роки тому +3

      @le Hoarderz Al-Shekelsteins the SU27, SU30 etc wasnt used in the iraqi war dumbasss

    • @Trubshaw2
      @Trubshaw2 4 роки тому +2

      Edoardo Quarta W⚓️

    • @shchorss
      @shchorss 4 роки тому

      @le Hoarderz Al-Shekelsteins The Iraqis used exported MiGs...

    • @Flappatackle
      @Flappatackle 4 роки тому +1

      @Edoardo Quarta 904 families might disagree with you

  • @FlyersAviation
    @FlyersAviation 5 років тому +13

    Those three American MAX's though at 7:36

  • @u.s.patriot3415
    @u.s.patriot3415 5 років тому +10

    Yes, it's extremely expensive, no, it is not perfect, as nothing on Earth is. BUT...once ALL bugs/kinks have been addressed, I'd rather be a Fighter Pilot in the F-35 than any other fighter in existence today, that's for sure!

    • @mraviatorboii2510
      @mraviatorboii2510 5 років тому +2

      U.S. PATRIOT 💯

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 5 років тому +2

      i would prefer su-57 or su-34, but i would love to try this thing also )

    • @mraviatorboii2510
      @mraviatorboii2510 5 років тому

      idi m Ohh we all have preferences... So no worries.

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 5 років тому +2

      @@mraviatorboii2510
      It is a pity that our pilots can not meet together, as once before. This could be a grandiose meeting, as in the days of the Soviet Union, when Russians flew in American jets and Americans flew in Russian MIGs. On the background of the movie "top gun" it was a double pleasure for me as a kid back then, to see how pilots of both sides enjoy every minute of it ))

    • @christophermackay5502
      @christophermackay5502 5 років тому +3

      Rather be an American than anybody else....... But yeah, Pilot sounds cool too. (Infantry grunt)

  • @OcotilloTom
    @OcotilloTom 5 років тому +53

    I live one mile from Luke AFB in El Mirage AZ. one of two training sites for F-35 pilots. I get to see an airshow every day right over my house.
    Gy.Sgt. Tom Boyte USMC retired
    Vietnam 65-66 / 70-71

  • @calcrappie8507
    @calcrappie8507 4 роки тому +4

    Kinda reminds me of a very aerodynamic F-4. Beast power. I saw the Blue Angels with F-4's when I was a kid and it was unforgettable.

  • @MuhammadTayyab-iv4rd
    @MuhammadTayyab-iv4rd 5 років тому +6

    We got cameras in cell phones in 2006.... and they were using them in early 80z.... u can imagine how much ahead they are.... it’s pretty scary... doesn’t it ? 👽👽

  • @stevevater8598
    @stevevater8598 5 років тому +6

    A very impressive display. The real test is how serviceable it will be in theater of war.

  • @MagictrainsOrg
    @MagictrainsOrg 5 років тому +5

    Absolut amazing !!!

  • @radfish4161
    @radfish4161 5 років тому +60

    Huey: *WOPWOPWOP* "LOOK AT ME"

    • @hueyrosayaga
      @hueyrosayaga 4 роки тому

      That's why it's my name, my dad was in the military and he wanted to name me after the heli he flew

    • @f-u2883
      @f-u2883 3 роки тому

      @@hueyrosayaga that sounds very cool.

    • @QueenDaenerysTargaryen
      @QueenDaenerysTargaryen 3 роки тому

      I did see that

  • @FlyersAviation
    @FlyersAviation 5 років тому +12

    Sensational Footage mate! Liked

  • @TheNatestEver
    @TheNatestEver 5 років тому +142

    Shutting up the haters one show at a time lol

    • @jemailunay2572
      @jemailunay2572 5 років тому +5

      haha correct bro!

    • @ert870
      @ert870 5 років тому +28

      It's hard to shut them up, as most of them are russian trolls, who get paid for "hating". Just ignore them.

    • @nimrodquimbus912
      @nimrodquimbus912 5 років тому +4

      Media was as wrong about the F22 as Robert Mueller

    • @1MTEK
      @1MTEK 5 років тому +11

      @@ert870 The haters aren't just Ruskies. Foreign and domestic competitors have been out to discredit this aircraft since the beginning. They know it's a big deal. Its capabilities and export potential make them quite nervous.

    • @akltom
      @akltom 5 років тому +2

      crashed in Japan... one fall at a time😅

  • @lantinian
    @lantinian 5 років тому +69

    I am impressed by the instantaneous turn at 14:20

    • @rwat7227
      @rwat7227 5 років тому +2

      Cheers

    • @popeye9971
      @popeye9971 5 років тому +11

      Nikolay Andreev The Gs that pilot must experience would be insane.

    • @reaperrt1019
      @reaperrt1019 5 років тому +6

      Popeye 99 - yeah man. Dude wasn’t pulling G’s... he was pulling H’s. Lol

    • @youreale
      @youreale 5 років тому

      @@reaperrt1019 lol, indeed

    • @jamesmarshall3311
      @jamesmarshall3311 5 років тому +4

      What about that move at 17.20 !! Amazing.

  • @jeremyjdl713
    @jeremyjdl713 4 роки тому +37

    I was a sub contractor at Lockheed Martin some years ago and saw these things being build like 10 ft away from me. Insane how tight cleanliness was when we were around the jets.

    • @quasimotto8653
      @quasimotto8653 4 роки тому +9

      Yes! I had that same experience at the Ft Worth TX plant when LM first started building the F-22. At the time, they were still building the F-16, but at the far end of the hangar, there was a small area curtained off. Behind that curtain was a single, partially completed F-22. I was in the IT dept and I had to upgrade some software on one of the PCs behind that curtain. I was the only one back there and as I was leaving, I couldn't resist the temptation; I ran my hand along the surface of the left wing. I'm telling you........it didn't have the feel of any metal or any other material I've ever touched. It made the hair on the back of my neck stand up and in my head, I could hear the theme music/song to The X-Files.

    • @kanyaweesitpithank3741
      @kanyaweesitpithank3741 2 роки тому

      @@quasimotto8653 เอาแค่กรีพเพ่นรุ่นอี-เฟ ก็ใหัมันได้เฮอะ เห็นแต่ทึ-6อ่โท่

    • @quasimotto8653
      @quasimotto8653 2 роки тому

      @@kanyaweesitpithank3741 โลภ ไม่แน่ใจว่าคุณหมายถึงอะไร เลดี้บอย

    • @quasimotto8653
      @quasimotto8653 2 роки тому

      @The_Meekling69 That is VERY close to what it felt like! Had a weird, textured, "dead" feel to it. Definitely didn't feel like metal. I didn't knock on it, but if I had, I am sure it wouldn't have made the typical sound you hear when you knock/tap on most metals.

  • @wendiepickett6641
    @wendiepickett6641 5 років тому +10

  • @baynguyenvan5703
    @baynguyenvan5703 5 років тому +5

    I hope that Vietnam will also buy from this type of aircraft to deal with China that is rampant in the East Sea, Thank good friends from America if they help sell it to us.

    • @michaelspangler8776
      @michaelspangler8776 5 років тому +3

      How does that work...a communist country buying a USA fighter jet? I like Vietnam, but would we even sell one to Vietnam?

    • @kevinking5406
      @kevinking5406 5 років тому +2

      Vietnam is a GORGEOUS Country

  • @craznicci
    @craznicci 5 років тому +10

    I like F-35 everything of this plane is perfect

    • @biroltosun
      @biroltosun 5 років тому

      david craznicci The most expensive casket that can fly. 🧐The S-400 system of the Russians turned them into garbage. America's debacle for America. because, An Israeli F 35 fighter been garbage with only Syria's s-300 system.

    • @christhedoc8689
      @christhedoc8689 5 років тому +4

      @@biroltosun hahahahhahahhaahhaha i have a question for you, what happened when the US fired the tomahawk missiles to syria to destroy their military bases?? why the s400 couldn't stop the 90% of the attack?? and you know what is the funny thing?? that before that attack, russia and people like you were saying that the s400 have the capabilities to stop any attack!!! hahahahhahahahaha...

    • @giggling_boatswain
      @giggling_boatswain 5 років тому +1

      @@christhedoc8689 Do not mislead people. I inform you. In Syria, C-300, C-400 has never been used. S-400 guard only Russian base. Check it out. So far there has not been a single shot from the S-300. Launched 103 tomahawk. 71 were destroyed (I repeat S-300, S-400 did not shoot a single shot). Understand the situation deeper.

    • @christhedoc8689
      @christhedoc8689 5 років тому +4

      @@giggling_boatswain there's 2 s400 in syria, the first one was deployed on 2015 in Khmeimim Air Base, that is in a syrian air base, the second s400 system was deployed on 2017 in masyaf.... when those tomahawk were shot, russia didn't use his 2 s400 to take down those missiles because were too many... and besides russia don't have the money to waste theirs missiles for nothing... they didn't engage because they realize that they don't have the capailities to shot down more than 100 missiles... that's the only true.... i mean why the hell are you protecting your ally and at the end of the day you can't help?? syria said that they shot down most of them around 70, and then the US said that syria couldn't shot down any missiles... the next day of the attack the US showed proof with pictures that the 3 targets where successful destroyed... which i believe because i saw those pictures, which proof the syrian government showed???

    • @giggling_boatswain
      @giggling_boatswain 5 років тому +1

      @@christhedoc8689 That's right. In a serious collision, it is logical to destroy the carriers of tomahawks. And to fight the swarm of tomahawks (if 200 axes are flying at the same time), the S-350 was created. It has a cheaper rocket and 12 pieces on a single truck. Characteristics at the level of C-300. This year was adopted.

  • @tomigigglewithme1239
    @tomigigglewithme1239 4 роки тому +4

    Hope the next air show goes ahead, it's a great day! Iv been to everyone for as long as I can remember.

  • @derekchildress5
    @derekchildress5 5 років тому +15

    Yep! I underestimated this aircraft! It's a baby F-22 respectively! You really do good work! Keep making videos for us plane nuts lol!

    • @derekchildress5
      @derekchildress5 5 років тому

      @Blob B really, enlighten me/us!

    • @derekchildress5
      @derekchildress5 5 років тому

      @Blob B close air support?

    • @ryanestes7331
      @ryanestes7331 5 років тому +4

      @@derekchildress5 the f35 has better avionics and sensors and is better at air support. It's a strike fighter as opposed to an air supremecy fighter. The helmet is much more advanced as well. But I like your baby f22 comment it totally is

    • @mississippirebel1409
      @mississippirebel1409 5 років тому +3

      Derek Childress - I wouldn't call the F-35 a baby anything because it is an absolute BEAST at what it does. You have to remember that F-35 was built for a different role than the F-22. The F-22 was designed from the start with NO expense spared to be the greatest AIR SUPERIORITY fighter the world has ever seen and it succeeded at that. The F-35 comes out around 15 yrs later and was designed from the ground up to be a STRIKE FIGHTER, which means it's main purpose is to penetrate enemy air space and attack ground targets. That doesn't mean that it can't go out and dogfight by any means. Both aircraft have the most advanced avionics in the world, but the F-35 just has more and is better. The F-35 also acts as a mini AWACS and in some cases is better than normal AWACS aircraft because of how advanced it's technology is in it. The only real advantage the F-22 has over the F-35 is it's speed and maneuverability but the F-22 has that advantage over every fighter in the world lol.

    • @derekchildress5
      @derekchildress5 5 років тому

      @@mississippirebel1409wow! Thats kinda heartbreaking to me lol! My favorite (and ugliest) aircraft (The A-10) days are numbered!

  • @solngv8
    @solngv8 5 років тому +10

    The entire body of the F-35 is a lifting body. Hence the upward nose snout. The shape allows for extreme angles of attack and very slow flight without dropping out of the sky. Lifting bodies were first tested back in the 50's during the X-plane era.

    • @okandsoldat8074
      @okandsoldat8074 5 років тому

      solngv8 ?? The body of the a/c has always generated lift. Nothing new or sensational in that. This is a heavy sluggish slow reaction a/c. Compare with basically any other modern a/c. But then it’s not designed for dogfight. Luckily. It would loose. And Jesus, the tiptoeing ridiculous service guys, this is a prima-donna that needs heavy support at all times.

    • @predatorjunglehunter7332
      @predatorjunglehunter7332 5 років тому +1

      Okänd Soldat you are almost too stupid to be alive, you are commenting in a video of 22:22 minutes about the F-35 executing the combat maneuvers of the previous legacy aircraft that will replace, yet, you still saying that the plane effectively can't do that...

  • @20hansdiet
    @20hansdiet 5 років тому +4

    excellent display...80 negative...must Chinese or Russian.

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 5 років тому

      @M G G
      and american tax payers!

  • @SGTBizarro
    @SGTBizarro 4 роки тому +43

    9:36 what a sound!
    10:40 to 10:45 is also a great shot

    • @ronaldjones718
      @ronaldjones718 4 роки тому +2

      Stateof the art 2020

    • @henessy.-.45
      @henessy.-.45 3 роки тому

      How long do these pilots train to learn all these stunts? It's amazing to watch

  • @alistairbarclay3116
    @alistairbarclay3116 5 років тому +4

    Hope their scramble set up is a bit quicker to get them off the ground 😀😀

  • @markserainidis1058
    @markserainidis1058 5 років тому +5

    I would not want that american flying monster sneaking up to me, if i was a ground troop...

    • @frankcrawford416
      @frankcrawford416 5 років тому

      Yep, she is built to kill only your and my enemies. Have a good day!

  • @عادلالشعلانالغامدي-ك9ل

    تَمًَتْ . قال الله تعالى({إِنَّ اللَّهَ لا يَظْلِمُ مِثْقالَ ذَرَّةٍ وَإِنْ تَكُ حَسَنَةً يُضاعِفْها وَيُؤْتِ مِنْ لَدُنْهُ أَجْراً عَظِيماً (40)}. الأيه.

  • @user-NavalAviator
    @user-NavalAviator 5 років тому +7

    Very nice video👍

  • @HerrinSchadenfreude
    @HerrinSchadenfreude 5 років тому +13

    Beautiful plane. Still don't think I'd want it replacing the A-10 if I were on the ground fighting below it though.

    • @heavymetalweld805
      @heavymetalweld805 5 років тому +2

      You'd be crazy to want it replacing the A10.

    • @TheJBerg
      @TheJBerg 5 років тому

      The A-10 requires an uncontested air space to operate. It's a sitting duck to anyone who wants to shoot it down.
      F-35 sucks, but at least can operate with impunity in contested air space.

    • @SvenTviking
      @SvenTviking 5 років тому

      I’d still like to know when the US Marines will operate it either stealthy or Supersonic as they will load it with wings full of dumb bombs.

    • @SvenTviking
      @SvenTviking 5 років тому +1

      Neightrix Prime To be honest, all close air support requires air superiority. F35s aint going to be flying in with wings full of bombs unless the F22’s/F15s/Hornets have cleared the sky first.

    • @Bobskiboy85
      @Bobskiboy85 5 років тому

      well not if you want something that carries a 1/5th of the ammunition of the A-10 and a smaller calibre weapon...no neither would I.

  • @CrazyFunnyCats
    @CrazyFunnyCats 5 років тому +25

    6:33
    Shiny p51 mustang
    Our great 👍 uncle flew one for the RCAF 🇨🇦

    • @seanarmstrong7767
      @seanarmstrong7767 5 років тому +3

      Crazy Funny Cats Right on!! That mustang is gorgeous for sure..

    • @sg5733
      @sg5733 5 років тому

      Stunning plane. Always a pleasure seeing these babies flying

  • @WalrusRiderEntertainment
    @WalrusRiderEntertainment 4 роки тому +21

    Just went to the Edinburgh Airshow here in South Australia and the Vice did a way better show. The F-35A taxied nowhere near the crowds and also didn't do any pilot interaction afterwards. Also the 3 plane flyby with the older aircraft was brilliant in Vic..

    • @tilingaseme773
      @tilingaseme773 4 роки тому +1

      It does not have much maneuverability, it is f-35 flying torch, it just knows how to fly from dead to death and turn

    • @juanasaavedra6373
      @juanasaavedra6373 3 роки тому +1

      Uu

    • @plightfoot8491
      @plightfoot8491 3 роки тому +7

      Such a jealous hater

    • @plightfoot8491
      @plightfoot8491 3 роки тому +5

      @варфоломей ночь So you like to listed to Russian propaganda so be it
      they can’t afford to build it and it has been a failure

  • @szapio8480
    @szapio8480 5 років тому +12

    But, but russians say that it neither turns nor climbs

    • @Agent77X
      @Agent77X 5 років тому +2

      FA-35 is not for air to air combat! It is slow, not maneuverable. It not an interceptor type jet fighter! Not sure what the role of the FA-35 is other then an all around multi role fighter plane!

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 5 років тому

      that was said by americans, cause we just dont care! But sky belongs to Su and MiG family ;)

    • @szapio8480
      @szapio8480 5 років тому +3

      @@Orlington17 It's good to have dreams :)

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 5 років тому +1

      @@szapio8480
      yeah, one of them F35 is good ))

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 5 років тому

      @Möbius Strip
      lool )) its for selling to vassal allies ))

  • @dorito1446
    @dorito1446 5 років тому +6

    The LF On The Tail Stands For Luke AFB in Glendale AZ

  • @beegxxc9832
    @beegxxc9832 5 років тому +6

    Inb4 russian fanboys claiming soviet junk is better

    • @barambaniprometheus
      @barambaniprometheus 5 років тому

      of course is better, and also cheap, the 30 year old su-27 flanker is better, don't forget also when your super mega stealth f-117 was destroyed by 40 year old soviet trash made sam missile in yugoslavia :)

    • @beegxxc9832
      @beegxxc9832 5 років тому +2

      @@barambaniprometheus your garbage sucks, US Air Force did thousands of air raid hours, if Russian garbage did as many your pieces of shit would be falling down in hundreds. The only russian battle proven equipment are AK 47s and burnt wrecks of soviet tanks on mideast deserts.

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 5 років тому

      soviet junk? you clearly know nothing about jets...US jets are on the same old platforms or even older than russians! (f16 - 1976, f22 - 1990)! And yes, russian jets are better, why it hurts you so much???

    • @mfree80286
      @mfree80286 5 років тому

      @@barambaniprometheus F-117 was destroyed by planning idiocy and complacency, and an AA commander who actually understood the limitations of BOTH sets of equipment.
      You get a stealth overflight, you have (example only) 5 seconds to make a shot where your equipment needs 30 to get up and go.
      But.... someone keeps sending the same jet over the same place at the same times doing the same things.
      Answer? Tune in a little closer daily to give yourself a 10 second "sight picture" and have 25 seconds of warm-up already done (system active-ready) which you can do because you only have to sit like that for an hour or two waiting for that slot time.
      Now? You have 5 seconds in a 10 second window to get a determinable shot off.... and they did.
      It just took US planners letting them have dozens of chances to figure out what they were doing, to do it.
      If an F-117 flew that route once and never again, it wouldn't have been shot down.... no chances to hone in and predict.

  • @ВладимирРФ-й5ъ
    @ВладимирРФ-й5ъ 5 років тому +4

    И эта шляпа ещё и летает!?! Управляемость жуткая! И что за два полупокера в полукедах вокруг этой шляпы бегают?

  • @bobmat5510
    @bobmat5510 5 років тому +11

    F-35 LOOKS HELL and VERY POWERFUL .

  • @williamkillingsworth2619
    @williamkillingsworth2619 5 років тому +6

    Wow the energy management is absolutely incredible!

  • @nickykeightley1724
    @nickykeightley1724 5 років тому +38

    So beautiful. So terrifying. Awesome!

  • @m00nchildblues
    @m00nchildblues 4 роки тому +55

    Times like these, just be glad we have these on our side!

    • @jackcarver8234
      @jackcarver8234 4 роки тому

      because they can flight? try to do a sharp turn with and u finish in pieces

    • @SaidMetiche-qy9hb
      @SaidMetiche-qy9hb 4 роки тому +2

      the russian su-57 is better in maneuvers and stronger overall

    • @ryangodfrey3644
      @ryangodfrey3644 4 роки тому +10

      Yeah except it’s not combat ready or operational. This is. And the cost per unit is unknown (government speak for untold hundreds of millions). And this isn’t even meant to compete with the Su-57. The raptor is, and in every realistic combat scenario the raptor comes out on top, especially when in an IFR situation. The days of dogfighting are over, and Moscow seems to have forgotten this fact.

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 4 роки тому +4

      @@SaidMetiche-qy9hb which is why it doesn't have a single production model

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 4 роки тому

      @Kanwer Vikram what country are you from

  • @eco8gator
    @eco8gator 5 років тому +11

    F35 and associated systems are lethal because they are smart and hard to detect...and now I guess we also see that it's also quite maneuverable. Great flying Capt. Olson and congrats to Lockheed Martin on your creation.

  • @kansasjayhawk8386
    @kansasjayhawk8386 5 років тому +5

    Will this performance silence the ignorant critics of the F35? Probably not.

    • @angelherrera5240
      @angelherrera5240 5 років тому +2

      Critics will never shut up even after the F-35s first aerial victory

    • @lmao.3661
      @lmao.3661 5 років тому

      well of course not, the development!! bad plane bad plane!!!!

    • @kansasjayhawk8386
      @kansasjayhawk8386 5 років тому +1

      @@lmao.3661 So now all of a sudden you're an expert? No wait, you must be an aerodynamic engineer from Lockeed! With such a bold statement like that, you'd have to be.

    • @lmao.3661
      @lmao.3661 5 років тому

      Lmfao I was being sarcastic but that’s cool

  • @andradejurk
    @andradejurk 5 років тому +27

    The ground crew is part of the show. Amazing flight, amazing aircraft!

  • @samiaeldebal1039
    @samiaeldebal1039 5 років тому +14

    maravilloso♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐💐♥️♥️

  • @ridermak4111
    @ridermak4111 5 років тому +6

    Camera SKILLS !!! 🤙 🤜🤛