Cheers brother I have the same machine but I put my temperature higher. And I use Tergikleen for my cleaning solution. When they're done being cleaned I rinsed them off with distilled water using a pump sprayer over the sink careful not to leave cleaning film on record. and they sound amazing afterwards,👍🏻 good luck and have fun with your new cleaner
I've seen reviews of this type of cleaner and supposedly when you stack records that close together the ultrasonic action can't get to the inner surfaces. It would be interesting to clean those same ones manually after the Vevor since it kinda sucked.
Some good extra info in there, about scratches not necessarily damaging *older pressings* where the vinyl is thicker, from say 1960s...& *quadrophonic* recordings highlighting instruments obscured in other mixes even when played stereo, & even using alternate takes. Worth knowing.
Hmm. May want to talk to Kirmuss about that thing. I think need to be pretty careful with settings etc. Kirmuss tuned his machine to not damage the records and also has the right type of setup. I think Fremer also reviewed this machine…. I think the ultrasonic frequency may be the issue. Don’t even sound like they cleaned at all.
From what I’ve read and my own personal experience the machine won’t damage your records as long as you use it correctly. And I do agree with you that some of the records in this video didn’t sound all that much better, but that’s due to the fact that 3 of the 4 were in really bad shape to begin with. That being said, I really feel like the machine got rid of a lot of surface noise. It really made Donald Fagen’s The Night Fly sound excellent. I wish I could play more than 4 seconds, you would hear just how nice it cleaned up. Thanks for your comment.
@@BrianBringelson cool. It may be ok…it’s like 1/10 the price of some of the other units. My experience is that Charles Kirmuss has done a lot of research to get the best frequency for the ultrasonics. This looks like a machine made for multiple purposes.
@@revelry1969 that I do agree with you on. It’s clearly one of their standard machines with modifications made to clean records. But it seems to be safe, granted I haven’t run any of my Beatles pressings through it yet…haha
@@krwd interesting. I’ll have to try the next wash with two and see how it goes. I wanted to try the max amount to see how it would perform. I’m quite happy with the results.
@@BrianBringelsonYeah, another reviewer strongly recommending doing 4 or less records at a time. He found it to be Much more effective. But I’m glad to see what it can do with the max
My wife order one for me about eight months ago.I have about three thousand vinyl albums i have to get my butt in gear and start cleaning them😮😮 😮😮😮
Cheers brother I have the same machine but I put my temperature higher. And I use Tergikleen for my cleaning solution. When they're done being cleaned I rinsed them off with distilled water using a pump sprayer over the sink careful not to leave cleaning film on record. and they sound amazing afterwards,👍🏻 good luck and have fun with your new cleaner
Great review. I’m surprised that a machine of that quality is priced very reasonably.
I've seen reviews of this type of cleaner and supposedly when you stack records that close together the ultrasonic action can't get to the inner surfaces. It would be interesting to clean those same ones manually after the Vevor since it kinda sucked.
They just dropped the price on Amazon to $179!! That’s it… I’m buying one 😂
Some good extra info in there, about scratches not necessarily damaging *older pressings* where the vinyl is thicker, from say 1960s...& *quadrophonic* recordings highlighting instruments obscured in other mixes even when played stereo, & even using alternate takes. Worth knowing.
you realize 37c is body temp right?
@@baronofgreymatter14 sure
Hmm. May want to talk to Kirmuss about that thing. I think need to be pretty careful with settings etc. Kirmuss tuned his machine to not damage the records and also has the right type of setup. I think Fremer also reviewed this machine…. I think the ultrasonic frequency may be the issue. Don’t even sound like they cleaned at all.
From what I’ve read and my own personal experience the machine won’t damage your records as long as you use it correctly. And I do agree with you that some of the records in this video didn’t sound all that much better, but that’s due to the fact that 3 of the 4 were in really bad shape to begin with. That being said, I really feel like the machine got rid of a lot of surface noise. It really made Donald Fagen’s The Night Fly sound excellent. I wish I could play more than 4 seconds, you would hear just how nice it cleaned up. Thanks for your comment.
@@BrianBringelson cool. It may be ok…it’s like 1/10 the price of some of the other units. My experience is that Charles Kirmuss has done a lot of research to get the best frequency for the ultrasonics. This looks like a machine made for multiple purposes.
@@revelry1969 that I do agree with you on. It’s clearly one of their standard machines with modifications made to clean records. But it seems to be safe, granted I haven’t run any of my Beatles pressings through it yet…haha
just so you know Kirmuss is a snake oil salesman total bunk this is ultrasonic, not ultra frequency, more snake oil from the lab coat huckster
the more you put on that spindle the less effective the machine is i usually do one maybe two at time tops
@@krwd interesting. I’ll have to try the next wash with two and see how it goes. I wanted to try the max amount to see how it would perform. I’m quite happy with the results.
@@BrianBringelsonYeah, another reviewer strongly recommending doing 4 or less records at a time. He found it to be Much more effective. But I’m glad to see what it can do with the max