90% Of The Amazon Rainforest Is A Mystery | Joe Rogan & Graham Hancock & Flint Dibble
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 кві 2024
- If you like what we do, please feel free to support the channel through the link below.
☕www.buymeacoffee.com/universi...
Graham Hancock, formerly a foreign correspondent for "The Economist," has been an international bestselling author for more than 30 years with a series of books, notably "Fingerprints of the Gods," "Magicians of the Gods" and "America Before," which investigate the controversial possibility of a lost civilization of the Ice Age destroyed in a global cataclysm some 12,000 years ago. Graham is the presenter of the hit Netflix documentary series "Ancient Apocalypse."
Flint Dibble is an archaeologist at Cardiff University who has conducted field work and laboratory analyses around the Mediterranean region from Stone Age caves to Egyptian tombs to Greek and Roman cities. Flint enjoys sharing archaeology - from the nitty gritty to the grand - with people around the world. Subscribe to his UA-cam channel, "Archaeology with Flint Dibble," or follow him on X/Twitter for behind-the-scenes deep dives into 21st century archaeology.
Host: Joe Rogan
Producer: Jamie Vernon
Episode: 2136
Full Podcast here: open.spotify.com/show/4rOoJ6E...
Follow Our Socials
/ universityofjre - Розваги
Flint is a non player character!
So many disciplines are bound by accepted doctrine that makes them look like flat earthers.
Dibble gets a bit slippery here by tacitly insinuating it is not necessary to explore or excavate more areas. He proves Hancock’s position in that not enough has been done.
Graham’s whole argument is a lost civilisation must exist because we haven’t excavated the whole Sahara?
When you ask someone a question 5 times and he keeps avoiding answering, that means he knows nothing
that was a leading question. that guy said you can't excavate the Sahara because its a wind blown dessert.
“It’s been surveyed by my daaaad”… hahahahahahahahaha …. Hahahaha myyyy daaaaad lol
Rofl was looking for this comment
before you go throwing stones, you should check out his father. Harold L. Dibble. he was a giant in the field
@@blitzme99 So you condone brining your dead father into your squabbles? Grow a backbone and get off that stupid soap box.
@@blitzme99 hmm last comment was reported…. So the guy who is ok with someone calling their dead father into their squabbles likes to report comments he can’t respond too… lol
Grow up and learn how to navigate your own life kid.
Going forward, whenever I see University of JRE, I will continue to scroll past.
i like graham, it sucks people aren't allowed to think different these days.
@ideologyideology2021
cancel culture is when your ancient aliens parallel dribble gets sponsored by one of the biggest media corps in the world whilst an actual archaeologist working on multiple projects in the field has to beg for research grants yeah bro of course. Open minded doesn't mean letting someone literally take a shit into your brain. its an academic setting and academics require a logical thought process and evidence of which Hancock has none. He has book sales and gullible weed smoker tards however. I have no idea how u can watch someone flip flop and sperg out completely from his original thesis of a globe spanning advanced civilisation to "ok maybe you have not seen all the sahara however!" to "theyre trying to cancel me". "Think different" lmao
Wannabe Indiana Jones answers questions like a politician
Our ideas seem prosperous. That's so great. I love this man and never seen this. Btw, i know people here are similar to me and we are on the right path.
Whatever that is.
Crazy how Graham is actually going to all these places. Least the ones they allow him to join in on.
The sahara?! Oh my daddy owns it!
it mustve been so insufferable to sit through all this
kudos to joe
Current archeology is like your racis t grandpa that you will never make him happy or open his small mind
I love that every comment arguing against Graham has someone accusing them of being Flint in disguise.
Even now there a buried trading posts in the sand, finding some that are prehistoric is not impossible.
Graham Hancock damnn 👌🏾 #2024 😑
Spicy
Is it possible to excavate the Sahara ?
Right now is the time to recognize who's smart and who isnt, Flint..😅 Currently, there is enough going on in space that can tell us more about whats going on down here on the surface than is being released to the public for access by Flint and his pops.😅
Respect the Indiana Jonas Brother!!
Not making eye contact w/Graham Hancock and talking about his dad? Lowered his credibility right out
Graham’s argument is essentially the same as “there could be underwater civilizations and mile-tall godzillas at the bottom of the ocean because we’ve physically been to so little of it.”
What’s wrong with that?
@@TheoriginalBillBraskey It fundamentally misunderstands how we as humans survey things. You don’t need to physically be there or dig there to know what’s there.
Man may have walked on
@@TheoriginalBillBraskeyit’s just stupid
Gram is a monster of archeology! Indiana Jones on the other hand has been surveyed by his dad!! Hahahahaha. Has a great hat though...
he just isnt tho is he lad
Graham is a scam artist by claiming any of the crap he says should be taken seriously. I say this as a previous fan of his. His ideas are so damn cool and interesting. His stuff captivated me. However, I’ve learned that a lot of the stuff he says is just bs and you’re literally learning nothing by listening to him. If anything, he’s making some people dumber.
Who is this dope in the hat?
That’s flint baby
His dad was important
A very very mid archaeologist… and that’s all it took to wipe the floor with Graham. Imagine if he had a competent archaeologist on.
It's a talking cat bro
@@ghostpiratelechuck2259 uh oh you think flint baby wiped the floor with him baby?
Arguing to the negative is Mr Hancock, which appeals to the youtube dummies no doubt. We can't rule out a giant spaghetti monster that rule the saharas, just because we haven't explored all of it, by the same logic.
Ok hat man
Not necessarily the same logic at all. Reductionist thinking is exactly Mr. Hancock's point. He's not dismissing science, or suggesting anything outside the realm of completely possible. We know so little about anything, in comparison to this anomaly called life. Math is being challenged every day by quantum mechanics. Why should we dismiss an idea that the timeline of humankind is off? To make assertions that archeologists know best, is the same arrogance as telling someone else what is good for them. None of us can know, or will know, for sure what the story of Earth and the cosmos are. The more we admit we don't know, the more we will know. Which is certainly not a logical approach. By your logic, we are all UA-cam dummies are we not?
He is literally just saying archaeologists can’t rule out a lost civilization that’s hasn’t been discovered yet
But yet here you are on youtube dumb dumb.
@@aidanadair5499 now replace "lost civilization" with "giant spaghetti monster" 😀
An incredibly biased clip presenting only one side of an argument, from the unquestioned perspective of a charlatan 😂
Graham Hancock has walked so much back in these interviews
It's called scientific theory and scientific method.
Look it up if you need further explanation.
I’m talking about when he says “I don’t think there’s an archeological conspiracy against me” but I’m previous podcasts talks about being banned from the great pyramids and not allowed into certain sights but appreciate the ad hominem attack
You’re saying he wasn’t banned but was allowed at the time made those claims?
I’m saying if he’s really banned from the great pyramids as he has stated then he should have said that again instead of walking it back and saying he doesn’t believe there is an archaeological conspiracy against him.
Yes, what Graham does is pretty much the exact opposite of scientific theory and the scientific method. 😂
Such a boring podcast. And the dude in the hat owned the old guy. Rogan got so mad throughout 😂
Bro edit your response because it makes no sense
I was going to go hard but the way you wrote 😑you got to be a kid or mentally disabled which would explain your logic there.