I first read his work in 1960. I was 14 and my father gave me all of his books over a couple of years. He told me to learn and pay attention because he believed Immanuel. I read and took this to to heart. Over the ensuing years more and more of IV's work has been proven correct. Then came the Thunderbolt Project and The Electric Universe. Whoopie! And now Webb is shooting holes in the Big Bang lie. I wish my father could have lived to see this. I owe him my thanks!
My father also got me onto Velikovsky and I followed it up with my mother, who to my surprise, was also very clued up about his work and even started naming the names of the people who spoke out against him. Amazing to think, our parents are only so similar to ourselves in some regards and in others, we're just chips off the same block.
IV's got a great sense of humor. I laughed out loud quite a few times while reading Earth In Upheaval. I love his sarcasm and wit. At 20:55 "..Darwin achieved his victory over the book of Genesis.." That's funny!
😆😎👏🌈am trusting that now, with people like Alex Collier, Greg Braden, Paul Wallis, and most of the people that Regina Meredith interviews, science and spirit will weave a more grounded beautiful field of innate truth for our children to create from🌻
Taylor Swift in her music video for "Willow" showed the truth of what Akhenaten was really up too and capable of in last 1/3rd of the music video for "Willow".
@@sacredheart9053 look at the most famous stela of Akhenaten with the rays coming down from the sun to the eggs. That's how. I think the song is great personally
EV was cruising along and near the end he cranked it up a few notches and he was about to hit the turbo and they shut him down I am extremely great full others have carried the batton forward to 2018:-)
Thats always the same game with geniuses. (See also fate of Osho) These rare people could change the attitude of the w h o l e of humanity. And the upper class does NOT want the folks to be awakened . . . because these vampires take a nice living off the flocks blood, sweat and tears (e g their power, time , money) . . . (i.m.h.o). . . .
@@KibyNykraft yea they could but im still having an open mind to all possibilities.in terms of history , velkowsky is mostly right, he has chosen the correct path but more details we must know.devil is in the details.
@MrNilsenone I couldn't agree more! I've been studying Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky's work since 1972 and have never been able to let it go. Wal Thornhill, Australian physicist, EU electric universe proponent says the same, and added, "it was the logical leaps that Velikovsky made that made his work so compelling"... I quote out of memory and may not have done so accurately but the sentiment is there. Personally I feel very fortunate to even have known about Velikovsky, as his grandson likes to call him, let alone to know many who actually knew, and worked with him, as I've become a better person for it.
I first heard about Immanuel Velikovsky back in the 80's. Back then, I had to actually make phone calls (no Internet!) to various bookstores around the country to find a copy. At that time, I paid $32.50 and it was worth every penny. I've read it over and over again; it's one of my favorite books to read. I've found that the louder the criticism, the more likely that someone's ox has been gored. Uppity intellectuals do not like to be called out. While I understand that not everything he wrote is 100% accurate, I believe the concept and supposition of what he intended. He was far ahead of his time, and time will prove him out.
Hi , i recently bought 'earth in upheaval' at a book sale for $1 because it looked interesting . Do you have to read his books in order or does it not matter?
Believe or not. This book was banned. In United States. From religious organizations. And churches. For a while. It seems like. They. Thought. It contradicted. Some sections in the bible. I. Think. Theses religious. Groups. That caused this problem. Was ingnorant. Even to this day. I do not see this book. In libraries. And book stores. You have to order this great book off the internet
TV used to be fun and informative, and velikovsky's books, especially for me, earth in upheaval & worlds in collision, are brilliant and fascinating...
He did the work and against some of the greatest minds, he proved correct. His works should be studied in school for all children to learn the logical truths.
🙌 👏 🙏 🤝 👍 so t r u e mate ! Even Gurdjieff stated in his lifetime (100 years ago !!) the UTTERLY DEEP sleep of humanity. So sad that almost nothing has changed over the decades. But I think a quantum jump is lurking at the horizon (imho) . . its alomost IN-evitable . . . so be blessed my friends . . .
The Capstone work of Velikofsky. I refer to it all the time. It's like all the other work he did found its purpose in this book.,Epigenetics is the next field that needs to refer to his work. From World's in Collision The way he depicts the mental anguish that would have been caused by Venus appearing in the sky, moving closer day by day the noise it started to make louder and louder months on end. To then read that maybe my dna was there and recorded it and to this day that memory could still be there sitting behind a wall of amnesia is just about the most exciting idea of this century..Einstein had the last century add in Jung, Freud and you're getting close. Open the Quantum discussion specifically the observers role in the outcome and there's Velikovsky with the when the how and the why then he leaves us with the biggest question of our age. Can we continue to use this ability to forget as a way to survive the earth changes that are upon us now. It's 30 years since we were told unless we changed our behavior and take note of global warming we will be cooked. And here we are staring at Venus again, fearful, mesmerized, we even know what to do but somehow we're frozen in the lights, we put it in the amnesia room as often as possible. This interview listening to him reminding me of those Austrian Jewish men of his age true savants of their time with a great sense of humor, great certainty, and that tone of voice and stare that says I don't blame you for not understanding that part for 30 years but the easy part took you forever ?? How anyone chose Carl 'Disney' Sagan over him ?
I’d say that he was born of his time. At the end of the 19th century, when people actually looked at evidence and tried to reason forward to a theory. He seems the last of an era of gentlemen-scientists, who did their research after doing their day jobs…
I think that was how they used to do things back in the day to give the effect that you entered into a portion of the conversation. That it didn't begin nor does it end there. Kind of like old rock and roll tracks. The music would just kind of fade out at the end of the track as if it were ongoing.
The interviewer should just shut up and let Immanuel talk, he keeps interrupting him. He musta loved the sound of his own voice. Nobody wants to hear him blabber on and on. Damn.
+ Greg Jay I have to agree on that as Mr. Larrabee does drone on with questions, however it must be said that Eric Larrabee was one of the first to stand with Dr. Velikovsky before the book (Worlds In Collision) was published.
Greg Jay I can feel that his style was to lay a foundation for the audience to follow in under-standing the new [newly shown] science and also to confuse [double-method of information] the ignorant [unknown knowledge] audience
+ mildred davis I have been in contact with Greg Jay and he is now quite a positive force in the bringing attention to the work of Velikovsky and the thunderbolts/electric universe paradigm as well and his being a bit impatient here is as he said due to his being new o much of this at the time. I have grown to respect Greg Jay and actually have his email as a favor to those of us who have grown to respect Velikovsky and his works. P.S. I don't believe that there is anyone who has more respect for Velikovsky and his work the the Australian physicist Wallace (Wal) Thornhill who has videos on the thunderbolts you-tube channel that are truly eye opening.
Funny how mainstream discredited most of this guy work. For ex mainstream assuring and postulating that they knew what venus temperature and retrograde motion was without benefits of the doubt. Then he was attack for saying something different that turn out to be more realistic or closer to the truth. And just in the same way today for more than a century mainstream has blindly assure us they got the answer to the many questions concerning that that we don't know, but interestingly enough things are slowly starting to reveal themself to be the complete opposite or somewhat erroneous, all thanks to new minds that go against the stream of the status cuo and spread the knowledge, dismantling decades of false data and info of our history.
Thanks so much for posting this. Reading the book worlds in collision right now it is engrossing. This is THE tale of all our heartbreak as a human race. all the tragedies and epics of our recent history are written in description of this one event. For those who are hungry for more check out the book titled “cataclysm“ by Delair and Allan. It picks up where Velokovsky left off but focuses heavily on much more recent geological findings and paleontological findings.
He debunked Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection by positing instantaneous evolution due to cosmic electro-magnetic events, including changes in inorganic materials - creation of diamonds, for instance.
@@prodiptoroy830 same as now, you get ridiculed for questioning mainstream scientific beliefs (ie dark matter, which isnt proven afaik)... so basicly yes. same as everywhere, old folks in higher positions dont like their worldview challenged... be it military, politics, economy etc
I can’t stand this interviewer. Doesn’t the interviewer realize nobody wants to hear what he has to say? Geeze, the interviewer talks more than the person he’s interviewing!
Since this comment was made three years ago, it seems pointless to ask, but perhaps just as a general rhetorical question then - how do you, and really, how do all the apparent PHDs in cosmology, physics, astronomy, etc. in the comments for this video know that? I agree with Sagan that it was wrong to dismiss this man's ideas outright without thoroughly analyzing them, but people did - and they _didn't_ and still _don't_ add up.
@@JET7C0 _"...how do you, and really, how do all the apparent PHDs in cosmology, physics, astronomy, etc. in the comments for this video know that?"_ They don't. Morons like the OP actually think rejecting what we commonly know about the universe somehow makes them a renegade. UA-cam comment sections are full of pseudo-intellects sizing each other up, professing themselves to be smarter than they really are. And, if "mainstream" cosmology is "science fiction", what does that say about Immanuel Velikovsky's methodology? These same jackasses praising this peddler don't even realize that he was chastised by the scientific community because Velikovsky's methodology was often trying to fit the Bible into science when it has no business being the basis of any scientific inquiry.
The Grand Tack hypothesis, probablly wouldn't have been formed, without this brilliant man, enduring the criticism and negativity that he did. Venus and Uranus are the black sheep in the family. In the case of Uranus, simulations from 2011 propose that several smaller collisions, rather than one large impact, knocked Uranus’ spin to an extreme angle of 98 degrees. This could also explain why Uranus’ moons rotate at the same angle, which would be unlikely if there were just one massive collision. Its such a fascinating subject!
Velikovsky will be vindicated. His theory may not be entirely correct, but he was certainly on the right path and his work has lit a path for those interested in the truth of human history.
+ Atricia Cannon Dr. Archie Roy said, "I believe he is wrong but if so he is magnificently wrong" noting the amazing work involved in Dr. Velikovsky's research, which I understand from doing my own followup research and being in contact with Velikovsky's grandson that Velikovsky spent 10 years researching at the library of congress almost everyday to glean the information to produce Worlds in Collision and Earth in Upheaval.
it is difficult to know who's "side" the interviewer is on, but he does state the true reason as to why the scientific establishment refuse to test Velikovsky's ideas and any other theories associated with the proposition of an Electric Universe: He states, "the embarrassment for science is that (Velikovsky is) seeking to unearth a natural fact by way of humanistic evidence" and that "this also is an argument (against Velikovsky's methods)". The trick he pulls there is the same approach as any position within establishment science: stating the methods of prediction as being scientifically unmethodical and thereby rendering any predicted observations that challenge the established scientific paradigm as being somehow inadmissible as evidence for the heretical theory and, in contradiction, the orthodoxy will describe any anomalous observations through other ad-hoc explanations that may be more compatible with the existing paradigm. It is really quite unbelievable that no matter how many successfully predicted observations are made by an Electric Universe cosmology, which confound the counterpart predictions made by the scientific orthodoxy, there appears to remain an institutionalised automatic discrediting of the associated theories! Just an observation from a layperson interested in the "natural sciences", you understand, and in no way to be thought worthy of the consideration of the highly esteemed people of science who we see on the tv, speaking of the “Wonder" and “Awe" of the universe etc...
Oh good heavens. I am old now. I grew up in a world where "interviewers" were required to be neutral. It is a mark of our times that this "neutrality" expressed as an inability to determine what "side" the interviewer is on is somehow unusual. It appears that we expect our interviewers, now, to be biased and on one side of a question or another. But this is the wrong way to do things! It has always been wrong. That it is so common place that actual "objective" interviews seem odd is horrifying.
Louis Dackombe , well done Louis that was great, it seems I’m very late to this argument and wonderful hypothesis, so late that it was only a month ago I’d ever heard of the electric universe I’m loosing sleep,it has totally changed my focus on the way I seen things, from the weather ,to the way plants grow, the forces on the body, our ancestors and so much more,and to think it was right in front of us, no need for mystical mathematics,inventing events with only the hallway of conventional theories to walk down,I feel now that we actually do have a path to explore,a real chance to move forward. Thank you again you have expressed very eloquently and articulated something that is quite hard to share. Thank you ✌️
For me Velikovsky's description of the ancient records of the wayward Venus explains perfectly the passage in Isaiah 14:12 - 14:14 about Lucifer (bad translation), which really refers to Venus: 12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer [ie,Morning Star, or Venus], son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High
Remarkable interview to this amazing scholar and researcher who swam against the official establishment of the academy around the evolutionist and uniformitarian theses on the appearance of species and the stages of formation of the planet, even proposed a reformulation in the chronologies of ancient civilizations.
Rexx Bailey I agree. It is rather interesting that at MIT they are claiming to create electricity from air - when Nikola Tesla invented an aerial device that captured energy from the air in the early 1900s [1901]. Others have as well: In 1925, Hermann Plauson, in 1936, Thomas Henry Moray, etc., There were others, of course, Alexkor/Rayburn/Nathan Stubblefield, etc., - however, their work was not promoted to nor for us It seems that MIT is not even acknowledging the foundations of scientific inventors before them It begs to research the founding fathers of such institutions
"In 1956 it was calculated and accepted that the surface temperature of Venus is 17c only 3c above the temperature of the Earth" - avg temperature on Venus is 864 F (462 Celsius) 🤣
Consider things and options. Don't judge right by which you are taught. Think after the teaching, study more, and then reach conclusions. Centuries from now, they will be proven either wrong or lacking.... and this is the process emmanuel is teaching. If we are evolving, so must our ideas, thinking, and questioning . Never be certain, because you will never know.
This is an excellent lesson for journalism students and podcasters on HOW NOT TO interview someone. My goodness, one interruption after another, after another. RIP Mr. Velikovsky. ✝
I read his first book when i was a kid back in the 60's. i reread the first 3 in the 80s along with sitchkin . I am a ancient history buff and have read of the other myths/stories that he alludes to. so many theories are debunked by the mainstream as a matter of fact it seems. maybe this is why einstein could never get his 2 theories to work together. kind of explains the super gash in mars side that science will not attempt o explain. if it was a giant interplanetary plasma bolt from the collision of magnetic fields as he talks about happening to the earth, then there is the proof required. i dont know much about the electric universe as i really have little interest in that aspect. i see i need to re investigate it tho. some of Venus's weirdness, like the temp and the atmosphere shows that he was right and it is a new planet. same with its orbit. makes you wonder tho if it came from jupiter or outside and passed by uranis, causing its tilt and orbit? maybe this is the planet niberu that the sumerians talked of? No i dont believe in aliens from space, reason why? every advanced civilization destroys the under civilization. any race from space would have been incompatible to earth and would have bio-engineered the earth to them. empty planet tho is different. but since gobekli tepi has been found it would have to be earlier then 12000 years ago.
@don trotter I read (Worlds in Collision) back in 1972 and have been following along ever since. In the late 90's I ran across KRONIA, which later became (the thunderbolts project) and a team of scientists that have brought Velikovsky's work up to date, check it out and let me know what you think.
wonderful Story wonderful clam have story, tooo da universe is curreny acting like a MUD STUCK ANUSIVE BULL DYKE Child BULLY a little hollywood imaginative ACTOR such a child mistaken evidence as a mean tyrrant is actually a CRYING CHILD BULLY,... fit thrower in its TERRIBLE TWO's and Mother is breast feeding the little NIPPLE TOOTH BITER quite a Pre Dick a Mint Treasury chest BanQuet pololololol 00 ; : olo enjoy the shot mecos
Wonderful, 🌻Thankyou. 🌻I wondered whether you had considered chatting to Alex Collier, Paul Wallis and Barbara Hand Clow also. So thrilling that people are bravely speaking up, now, yippee, I have faith in our Beautiful Futures, now 🌻
Too bad channel 3 cut short the interview. Nowadays Darwin’s theory has crumbled due to many archeological findings of man past and the fact that the “missing link” nor evidence, not even one, of a specie evolving into something else.
The thing I didn't like about this video is that ... I didn't get to hear the rest of what they were speaking about. :) This is intriguing and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I guess I'll just have to buy his book. But seriously, thanks for uploading.
No contemporary main line thinkers believed that “ invisible” germs caused disease… but our Creator knew that… wash hands… keep “outhouses” far from homes with food… etc… the facts make TOTAL sense❤
6 minutes in and no velikovsky then we get 30 seconds of velikovsky and immediately the interviewer goes on a rambling explanation because he loves the sound of his voice. What the hell? I don't want to hear the ding dongs giving the interview I want to hear Velikovsky let the man speak!
Unfortunately nothing much has changed with the hosts always talking more than the guests, cutting them off and not letting them finish their sentences!
I first read his work in 1960. I was 14 and my father gave me all of his books over a couple of years. He told me to learn and pay attention because he believed Immanuel. I read and took this to to heart. Over the ensuing years more and more of IV's work has been proven correct. Then came the Thunderbolt Project and The Electric Universe. Whoopie! And now Webb is shooting holes in the Big Bang lie. I wish my father could have lived to see this. I owe him my thanks!
My father also got me onto Velikovsky and I followed it up with my mother, who to my surprise, was also very clued up about his work and even started naming the names of the people who spoke out against him. Amazing to think, our parents are only so similar to ourselves in some regards and in others, we're just chips off the same block.
IV's got a great sense of humor. I laughed out loud quite a few times while reading Earth In Upheaval. I love his sarcasm and wit. At 20:55 "..Darwin achieved his victory over the book of Genesis.." That's funny!
Thank you for bringing us this! Thumbs up #287
_Velikovsky is a true polymath._
SAPPER FOREVER how did he get from psyche to here?
took the high road
That the entire scientific community was aligned against him is good enough evidence that IV was correct
😆😎👏🌈am trusting that now, with people like Alex Collier, Greg Braden, Paul Wallis, and most of the people that Regina Meredith interviews, science and spirit will weave a more grounded beautiful field of innate truth for our children to create from🌻
Exactly!
LOL!!!! Like Alex Jones?
TRUTH WILL ALWAYS SHINE.
I was sent here by Juan O’Savin 10/22.
Taylor Swift in her music video for "Willow" showed the truth of what Akhenaten was really up too and capable of in last 1/3rd of the music video for "Willow".
What do you mean??? I watched the video and the song was awful. But how does it relate to Akhenaten??????
@@sacredheart9053 look at the most famous stela of Akhenaten with the rays coming down from the sun to the eggs. That's how. I think the song is great personally
how come when i search for velikvosky, professor daves explains something unrelated comes up? beyond ridiculous.
Oh Lucifer, Son of the Morning (morning star), how you were cut down from the heavens, how you did weaken the nations! - Isiah 14:12
There's 2 people you can never trust, priests and physicists, history is not just superstition.
Bro is not correct, venus ia not 7000 years old cmon how how!? How is that even possible please people
EV was cruising along and near the end he cranked it up a few notches and he was about to hit the turbo and they shut him down I am extremely great full others have carried the batton forward to 2018:-)
They cannot take truth, therefore they are frauds.
They did that brilliant man so wrong
Thats always the same game with geniuses. (See also fate of Osho) These rare people could change the attitude of the w h o l e of humanity. And the upper class does NOT want the folks to be awakened . . . because these vampires take a nice living off the flocks blood, sweat and tears (e g their power, time , money) . . . (i.m.h.o). . . .
Lol!
This debunks "ancient aliens" completely.
Homo sapiens could have had high civilization in the distant past
@@KibyNykraft yea they could but im still having an open mind to all possibilities.in terms of history , velkowsky is mostly right, he has chosen the correct path but more details we must know.devil is in the details.
Velikovsky is GOD
The interviewer talks too much, the interviewed doesn't go to the point
"We stand on the shoulders of giants" rarely applies as profoundly as it does in regards to Immanuel Velikovsky.
apparently and literally on their remains
@MrNilsenone I couldn't agree more! I've been studying Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky's work since 1972 and have never been able to let it go. Wal Thornhill, Australian physicist, EU electric universe proponent says the same, and added, "it was the logical leaps that Velikovsky made that made his work so compelling"... I quote out of memory and may not have done so accurately but the sentiment is there. Personally I feel very fortunate to even have known about Velikovsky, as his grandson likes to call him, let alone to know many who actually knew, and worked with him, as I've become a better person for it.
I often stand on the shoulders of little short people. That way, my observations tell me what everyone else knows.
🙌 👏 🙏 🤝 👍
Find an American under 20 years of age that can drive to a destination without a phone.
LONG LIVE VELIKOVSKY ♥️💛🧡💚❤️💜💙
"I wish my opponents a long life" How confident was he!
I first heard about Immanuel Velikovsky back in the 80's. Back then, I had to actually make phone calls (no Internet!) to various bookstores around the country to find a copy. At that time, I paid $32.50 and it was worth every penny. I've read it over and over again; it's one of my favorite books to read. I've found that the louder the criticism, the more likely that someone's ox has been gored. Uppity intellectuals do not like to be called out. While I understand that not everything he wrote is 100% accurate, I believe the concept and supposition of what he intended. He was far ahead of his time, and time will prove him out.
Hi , i recently bought 'earth in upheaval' at a book sale for $1 because it looked interesting . Do you have to read his books in order or does it not matter?
Believe or not. This book was banned. In United States. From religious organizations. And churches. For a while. It seems like. They. Thought. It contradicted. Some sections in the bible. I. Think. Theses religious. Groups. That caused this problem. Was ingnorant. Even to this day. I do not see this book. In libraries. And book stores. You have to order this great book off the internet
so glad that you have this on record, amazing, way ahead of his time, great interview
TV used to be fun and informative, and velikovsky's books, especially for me, earth in upheaval & worlds in collision, are brilliant and fascinating...
In my experience when you cause such a stir as he did you are on to something.
He did the work and against some of the greatest minds, he proved correct. His works should be studied in school for all children to learn the logical truths.
I teach many people including my 6 children about the magneto electric universe and our ancient past.
He was a scientifically illiterate, clueless nutter.
he even got einstein to admit mistake. 2 geniouses.
@@effexon indeed. He knew!
You so know why they suppressed him, don't you ?????
I hope this recycles again...this is vital for our current state of affairs! MANKIND IN AMNESIA
🙌 👏 🙏 🤝 👍 so t r u e mate ! Even Gurdjieff stated in his lifetime (100 years ago !!) the UTTERLY DEEP sleep of humanity. So sad that almost nothing has changed over the decades. But I think a quantum jump is lurking at the horizon (imho) . . its alomost IN-evitable . . . so be blessed my friends . . .
The Capstone work of Velikofsky. I refer to it all the time. It's like all the other work he did found its purpose in this book.,Epigenetics is the next field that needs to refer to his work. From World's in Collision The way he depicts the mental anguish that would have been caused by Venus appearing in the sky, moving closer day by day the noise it started to make louder and louder months on end. To then read that maybe my dna was there and recorded it and to this day that memory could still be there sitting behind a wall of amnesia is just about the most exciting idea of this century..Einstein had the last century add in Jung, Freud and you're getting close. Open the Quantum discussion specifically the observers role in the outcome and there's Velikovsky with the when the how and the why then he leaves us with the biggest question of our age. Can we continue to use this ability to forget as a way to survive the earth changes that are upon us now. It's 30 years since we were told unless we changed our behavior and take note of global warming we will be cooked. And here we are staring at Venus again, fearful, mesmerized, we even know what to do but somehow we're frozen in the lights, we put it in the amnesia room as often as possible. This interview listening to him reminding me of those Austrian
Jewish men of his age true savants of their time with a great sense of humor, great certainty, and that tone of voice and stare that says I don't blame you for not understanding that part for 30 years but the easy part took you forever ?? How anyone chose Carl 'Disney' Sagan over him ?
Immanuel Velikovsky a man born before his time. God bless him.
. . . same with Nietzsche . . . Osho . . . and many more. . . .
I’d say that he was born of his time. At the end of the 19th century, when people actually looked at evidence and tried to reason forward to a theory. He seems the last of an era of gentlemen-scientists, who did their research after doing their day jobs…
You have blown my mind to pieces, your work is a true blessing to our understanding of life as we know it...
Why is your name what it is and why are you phrasing it as "blown my mind to pieces"
great how they just cut him off at the end like he's just rambling or something..
Effing exactly! Velikovsky should have slapped the sh1t out of him.
I think that was how they used to do things back in the day to give the effect that you entered into a portion of the conversation. That it didn't begin nor does it end there.
Kind of like old rock and roll tracks. The music would just kind of fade out at the end of the track as if it were ongoing.
I could listen to them talking all my life and not get tiered of it!
A true visionary!
Velikovsky will be proved correct on all counts. The group-think of the establishment mental pygmies who tried to silence him is typical of the type.
LOL! He was lucky AF. He was a kook!
The interviewer should just shut up and let Immanuel talk, he keeps interrupting him. He musta loved the sound of his own voice. Nobody wants to hear him blabber on and on. Damn.
+ Greg Jay I have to agree on that as Mr. Larrabee does drone on with questions, however it must be said that Eric Larrabee was one of the first to stand with Dr. Velikovsky before the book (Worlds In Collision) was published.
Greg Jay
I can feel that his style was to lay a foundation for the audience to follow in under-standing the new [newly shown] science and also to confuse [double-method of information] the ignorant [unknown knowledge] audience
+ mildred davis I have been in contact with Greg Jay and he is now quite a positive force in the bringing attention to the work of Velikovsky and the thunderbolts/electric universe paradigm as well and his being a bit impatient here is as he said due to his being new o much of this at the time. I have grown to respect Greg Jay and actually have his email as a favor to those of us who have grown to respect Velikovsky and his works. P.S. I don't believe that there is anyone who has more respect for Velikovsky and his work the the Australian physicist Wallace (Wal) Thornhill who has videos on the thunderbolts you-tube channel that are truly eye opening.
6 mins to start the interview
@GregJay Haha! Spooky Toof is taking a leaf out of the old book 🤍
Funny how mainstream discredited most of this guy work. For ex mainstream assuring and postulating that they knew what venus temperature and retrograde motion was without benefits of the doubt. Then he was attack for saying something different that turn out to be more realistic or closer to the truth. And just in the same way today for more than a century mainstream has blindly assure us they got the answer to the many questions concerning that that we don't know, but interestingly enough things are slowly starting to reveal themself to be the complete opposite or somewhat erroneous, all thanks to new minds that go against the stream of the status cuo and spread the knowledge, dismantling decades of false data and info of our history.
LOL!
True intellect, outstanding
Thanks so much for posting this. Reading the book worlds in collision right now it is engrossing. This is THE tale of all our heartbreak as a human race. all the tragedies and epics of our recent history are written in description of this one event. For those who are hungry for more check out the book titled “cataclysm“ by Delair and Allan. It picks up where Velokovsky left off but focuses heavily on much more recent geological findings and paleontological findings.
He debunked Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection by positing instantaneous evolution due to cosmic electro-magnetic events, including changes in inorganic materials - creation of diamonds, for instance.
Why did they cut him off, stepping on some ither scientific icon's toes?
@@prodiptoroy830 same as now, you get ridiculed for questioning mainstream scientific beliefs (ie dark matter, which isnt proven afaik)... so basicly yes. same as everywhere, old folks in higher positions dont like their worldview challenged... be it military, politics, economy etc
@@effexon@MudfossilUniversity shows what dark matter is
I can’t stand this interviewer. Doesn’t the interviewer realize nobody wants to hear what he has to say? Geeze, the interviewer talks more than the person he’s interviewing!
We need to remain open minded and consider all possibilities as who can say in advance from who or where discoveries will be made.
The earth catastrophe cycle is here.
Present day mainstream cosmology is a science fiction b-movie brought to you by Winston cigarettes.
:D
Indeed
Since this comment was made three years ago, it seems pointless to ask, but perhaps just as a general rhetorical question then - how do you, and really, how do all the apparent PHDs in cosmology, physics, astronomy, etc. in the comments for this video know that? I agree with Sagan that it was wrong to dismiss this man's ideas outright without thoroughly analyzing them, but people did - and they _didn't_ and still _don't_ add up.
@@JET7C0 _"...how do you, and really, how do all the apparent PHDs in cosmology, physics, astronomy, etc. in the comments for this video know that?"_
They don't. Morons like the OP actually think rejecting what we commonly know about the universe somehow makes them a renegade. UA-cam comment sections are full of pseudo-intellects sizing each other up, professing themselves to be smarter than they really are.
And, if "mainstream" cosmology is "science fiction", what does that say about Immanuel Velikovsky's methodology? These same jackasses praising this peddler don't even realize that he was chastised by the scientific community because Velikovsky's methodology was often trying to fit the Bible into science when it has no business being the basis of any scientific inquiry.
@@Arena1999 Bible is a historical source. Dismissing it is stupid.
The Grand Tack hypothesis, probablly wouldn't have been formed, without this brilliant man, enduring the criticism and negativity that he did. Venus and Uranus are the black sheep in the family. In the case of Uranus, simulations from 2011 propose that several smaller collisions, rather than one large impact, knocked Uranus’ spin to an extreme angle of 98 degrees. This could also explain why Uranus’ moons rotate at the same angle, which would be unlikely if there were just one massive collision. Its such a fascinating subject!
Cutting someone off is highly suspect.
This video is a lost masterpiece of modern science. Follow data. Don't marry yourself to a theory that doesn't match data.
Why does no one ever feel the need to show the date of the original video/interview?
I agree with you whole heartedly. However, this interview does give you the date in the video to be in the year 1964. Hope that helps.
august 64
Velikovsky will be vindicated. His theory may not be entirely correct, but he was certainly on the right path and his work has lit a path for those interested in the truth of human history.
His writing's do have geat reference's to what he wrote about. And were very informative.
+ Atricia Cannon Dr. Archie Roy said, "I believe he is wrong but if so he is magnificently wrong" noting the amazing work involved in Dr. Velikovsky's research, which I understand from doing my own followup research and being in contact with Velikovsky's grandson that Velikovsky spent 10 years researching at the library of congress almost everyday to glean the information to produce Worlds in Collision and Earth in Upheaval.
Przykre, że po ponad 60 latach oficjalna nauka jest na poziomie, gdy dopiero zaczyna potwierdzać fakty o których pisał/mówił Velikowski.
Velikovsy was the Hancock of his day. Sit back and enjoy the academic hate exploding. Spectacular.
🙌 👏 🙏 🤝 👍 it is obviously only the utterly mad ghte of completely misleaded poor souls -.--> "Whose bread I eat - whose song I sing !"
Hancock was drunk and messed around. I dont see many similarities.
Lol. Quite accurate as they’re both crazy pseudoscientists except Velikovsky was WAY smarter.😂
6 mins of interviewer smelling his own farts. Interview starts at 6:00
@James Kirk Sure, Captain.
it is difficult to know who's "side" the interviewer is on, but he does state the true reason as to why the scientific establishment refuse to test Velikovsky's ideas and any other theories associated with the proposition of an Electric Universe: He states, "the embarrassment for science is that (Velikovsky is) seeking to unearth a natural fact by way of humanistic evidence" and that "this also is an argument (against Velikovsky's methods)". The trick he pulls there is the same approach as any position within establishment science: stating the methods of prediction as being scientifically unmethodical and thereby rendering any predicted observations that challenge the established scientific paradigm as being somehow inadmissible as evidence for the heretical theory and, in contradiction, the orthodoxy will describe any anomalous observations through other ad-hoc explanations that may be more compatible with the existing paradigm. It is really quite unbelievable that no matter how many successfully predicted observations are made by an Electric Universe cosmology, which confound the counterpart predictions made by the scientific orthodoxy, there appears to remain an institutionalised automatic discrediting of the associated theories!
Just an observation from a layperson interested in the "natural sciences", you understand, and in no way to be thought worthy of the consideration of the highly esteemed people of science who we see on the tv, speaking of the “Wonder" and “Awe" of the universe etc...
Oh good heavens.
I am old now. I grew up in a world where "interviewers" were required to be neutral. It is a mark of our times that this "neutrality" expressed as an inability to determine what "side" the interviewer is on is somehow unusual. It appears that we expect our interviewers, now, to be biased and on one side of a question or another. But this is the wrong way to do things! It has always been wrong. That it is so common place that actual "objective" interviews seem odd is horrifying.
Louis Dackombe yeah, we watched it... no need for a play by play. :p
well put
Louis Dackombe , well done Louis that was great, it seems I’m very late to this argument and wonderful hypothesis, so late that it was only a month ago I’d ever heard of the electric universe I’m loosing sleep,it has totally changed my focus on the way I seen things, from the weather ,to the way plants grow, the forces on the body, our ancestors and so much more,and to think it was right in front of us, no need for mystical mathematics,inventing events with only the hallway of conventional theories to walk down,I feel now that we actually do have a path to explore,a real chance to move forward. Thank you again you have expressed very eloquently and articulated something that is quite hard to share. Thank you ✌️
Electric Universe is horse manure….😂😂😂
For me Velikovsky's description of the ancient records of the wayward Venus explains perfectly the passage in Isaiah 14:12 - 14:14 about Lucifer (bad translation), which really refers to Venus:
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer [ie,Morning Star, or Venus], son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High
Lucifer? 😂😂😂
Remarkable interview to this amazing scholar and researcher who swam against the official establishment of the academy around the evolutionist and uniformitarian theses on the appearance of species and the stages of formation of the planet, even proposed a reformulation in the chronologies of ancient civilizations.
I bow down before this maestro of the intellect.
Who recorded those times?
Who plays this for us?
Hmm in times where utube censoring everything hmm
?????
GOD !! I AVE NEVER SEEN ANYONE OOZING BRILLIANCE LIKE DAT RIGHT FROM HIS FACE !! DIS GUY MAKES ME MISS TESLA :-/
Rexx Bailey
I agree. It is rather interesting that at MIT they are claiming to create electricity from air - when Nikola Tesla invented an aerial device that captured energy from the air in the early 1900s [1901].
Others have as well: In 1925, Hermann Plauson, in 1936, Thomas Henry Moray, etc.,
There were others, of course, Alexkor/Rayburn/Nathan Stubblefield, etc., - however, their work was not promoted to nor for us
It seems that MIT is not even acknowledging the foundations of scientific inventors before them
It begs to research the founding fathers of such institutions
Miss Tesla, if you'd kindly step behind that screen and take all your clothes off I'll be around to examine you in a moment >
He was a great lecturer
Love Velikovsky, Richard Feynman and Joseph Campbell!
Interesting "Russian" accent.
Isn't it a russian accent?
He's a jew not Russian, hence "Russian".
Yes he was escaped from Russia
"In 1956 it was calculated and accepted that the surface temperature of Venus is 17c only 3c above the temperature of the Earth" - avg temperature on Venus is 864 F (462 Celsius) 🤣
Consider things and options. Don't judge right by which you are taught. Think after the teaching, study more, and then reach conclusions. Centuries from now, they will be proven either wrong or lacking.... and this is the process emmanuel is teaching. If we are evolving, so must our ideas, thinking, and questioning . Never be certain, because you will never know.
this interviewer is SO annoying. I wish he would shut up and let the man finish a sentence.
He is the discordant.
This is an excellent lesson for journalism students and podcasters on HOW NOT TO interview someone.
My goodness, one interruption after another, after another.
RIP Mr. Velikovsky. ✝
Thanks
long live velikovsky
He surely WILL - through his wonderful works/books !!!
youtuber: Musfossil University
expands on this great work and Yale Univerity bully actor admitted it is true the twisted the great work
I read his first book when i was a kid back in the 60's. i reread the first 3 in the 80s along with sitchkin . I am a ancient history buff and have read of the other myths/stories that he alludes to. so many theories are debunked by the mainstream as a matter of fact it seems. maybe this is why einstein could never get his 2 theories to work together. kind of explains the super gash in mars side that science will not attempt o explain. if it was a giant interplanetary plasma bolt from the collision of magnetic fields as he talks about happening to the earth, then there is the proof required. i dont know much about the electric universe as i really have little interest in that aspect. i see i need to re investigate it tho. some of Venus's weirdness, like the temp and the atmosphere shows that he was right and it is a new planet. same with its orbit. makes you wonder tho if it came from jupiter or outside and passed by uranis, causing its tilt and orbit? maybe this is the planet niberu that the sumerians talked of? No i dont believe in aliens from space, reason why? every advanced civilization destroys the under civilization. any race from space would have been incompatible to earth and would have bio-engineered the earth to them. empty planet tho is different. but since gobekli tepi has been found it would have to be earlier then 12000 years ago.
@don trotter I read (Worlds in Collision) back in 1972 and have been following along ever since. In the late 90's I ran across KRONIA, which later became (the thunderbolts project) and a team of scientists that have brought Velikovsky's work up to date, check it out and let me know what you think.
He will be proven right when electricity will come to be more understood as the dominant force in our universe
Electric Universe theory is on the same level as flat earth, it’s just nonsense….
@@metaldave08096absolutely not!!!
Fantastic interview. It is a fractal universe.
Thank you.
Between his accent and the AI voice in other videos, I'm still totally clueless about his great ideas .
its funny the interviewer wants to critisice him but he knows velikovskys to smart for his bull
shit
Too
and allow the expapsy naaasheeeun: da' Peenneus a'rrreeenkle Fee NOMMY NAUM
EEE'
dee' MOMMY MOM
HA ha he he ha ha🧚🏼♀️🙋🏻♂️🙅🏿♀️
wonderful Story
wonderful clam
have story, tooo
da universe is curreny acting like a MUD STUCK ANUSIVE BULL DYKE Child BULLY
a little hollywood imaginative ACTOR
such a child mistaken evidence as a mean tyrrant is actually a CRYING CHILD BULLY,... fit thrower
in its TERRIBLE TWO's and Mother is breast feeding the little NIPPLE TOOTH BITER
quite a Pre Dick a Mint
Treasury chest BanQuet
pololololol
00
;
:
olo
enjoy the shot mecos
Wonderful, 🌻Thankyou. 🌻I wondered whether you had considered chatting to Alex Collier, Paul Wallis and Barbara Hand Clow also. So thrilling that people are bravely speaking up, now, yippee, I have faith in our Beautiful Futures, now 🌻
😮 increíble verlo grabado.
Too bad channel 3 cut short the interview. Nowadays Darwin’s theory has crumbled due to many archeological findings of man past and the fact that the “missing link” nor evidence, not even one, of a specie evolving into something else.
Nonsense! And they cut it short because at the end, he sounds like a petulant child bitching about being ridiculed again.
All these comments are bot created gibberish 😂
They did the same to Copernicus.
Synergistic symphony
Where are the new Velikovsky's?
@@kayecase8527 Hmmmm
it's the sun
If you pause and stop at 4:09, I swear Velikovsky on the right looks like Uncle Junior Soprano from the Sopranos show. LOLOLOL
captions are way off, just stupid, Velikovsky is still being ghosted.
I say..
"Let's go Velikovsky "
When genius is ignored.
The thing I didn't like about this video is that ... I didn't get to hear the rest of what they were speaking about. :) This is intriguing and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I guess I'll just have to buy his book. But seriously, thanks for uploading.
I just got my copy of Worlds in Collision two days ago. Suggested in one of Roger Spurr's videos.
This interviewer sucks, jeez let Mr. Velikovsky talk
No contemporary main line thinkers believed that “ invisible” germs caused disease… but our Creator knew that… wash hands… keep “outhouses” far from homes with food… etc… the facts make TOTAL sense❤
So why didn’t it feature in the Bible? Or other alleged religious medical institutions before it was discovered? Unfalsifiable nonsense!
"God does not play dice with the universe." Albert Einstein said. "God plays marbles." Immanuel Velikovsky might as well have added. 😎🖖
I'm really clever but no shit!!!the same as everyone else
thanks
A little late maybe for me to say this, but thank you
I believe Thomas Chan was a fan of this fellow.
Does it matter which order you read his books in?
Ojalá alguien le pusiera subtítulos.
LOVE EMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY AND ALL HIS CONTRIBUTIONS TO TRUTH! Truth always rings true.
John Cleese has watched this interview.
what are you talking about?
I was just thinking the same thing 50 years later
Christian Krenz
Wuppertal/NRW
6 minutes in and no velikovsky then we get 30 seconds of velikovsky and immediately the interviewer goes on a rambling explanation because he loves the sound of his voice. What the hell? I don't want to hear the ding dongs giving the interview I want to hear Velikovsky let the man speak!
Your very stupid. Velikovsky is the main speaker so what are you mr. ding dong talking about...
Eric Taylor aexy
Unfortunately nothing much has changed with the hosts always talking more than the guests, cutting them off and not letting them finish their sentences!
Strategy to undermine them.
Genius!
Why is it cut?
We all have a hero or two .
So good!