Tra tutte le partite che ho visto di Federer questa è la più incredibile, oserei dire perfetta. Da notare che nel secondo set conduceva 4-2 e 0-40 su servizio di Hewitt.
Felipe Queiroga Fed's forehand was only in the state shown above from mid-2004 to 2006. Basically with the n-Code his forehand was the best shot of all time.
TheSaxophoneMan16 Exactly. His forehand started to change from 07 onwards. In 07 he hit with much more spin and not nearly as flat, then it continued in that direction in 08 with a huge loss of pace. His 04-06 FH was the greatest of all time.
TheSaxophoneMan16 Agreed, I meant it changed FROM 06 to 07. I guess I worded that strangely. What do you think caused the drop off? I think a lot of it was intentional - he wanted more spin to get that elusive RG.
@@lorenzomarchi6635 forse perché questo video è commentato da molti anglofoni che non conoscono Clerici, mentre per gli italiani sarebbe superfluo ricordare che enorme giornalista fosse?
@@glizingaridelbosco2137 Ma che ti frega che gli anglofoni conoscano Clerici? Tanto a loro non frega nulla, mentre noi già lo conosciamo. I giornalisti ed anche i tennisti e tutti gli addetti ai lavori internazionali lo conoscono. 500 anni di tennis è il libro più importante mai scritto sul tennis. Tradotto in svariate lingue.
I guess Im asking the wrong place but does anyone know of a way to log back into an Instagram account..? I somehow forgot my login password. I appreciate any help you can offer me
@@gianlucamazza222Non diciamo sciocchezze 😅 Magari avete iniziato a seguire da poco il tennis, ma gli avversari c'erano eccome. Esattamente come ci sono oggi, alcuni davvero grandi.
@@chuck1240 assolutamente grandissimi. Roddick, Hewitt, Nalbandian, Baghdatis e Safin che ha giocato con impegno 5 o 6 tornei in carriera. Agassi era ormai sul viale del tramonto ma si… Federer ha avuto grandissimi avversari 🤣🤣🤣🤣posa il fiasco amico
To those who think Feds forehand is bigger here have to understand that Hewitt doesn't hit a big ball like Nadal or Djokovic so it gives Federer a bit more time to line up his shots.
My opinion - Hewitt would be more tough opponent for Federer (and Rafa & Nole) if he... could be physically stronger. He was SUPER fast, he had SUPER fighting spirit, he had fantastic serve return, technics, volleyer skills, BUT... He was physically weak. If he would have better and stronger serve, more powerful forehand and backhand, he could be competitive against BIG3. The game in general also improved while Lleyton was at the top. Guys were playing with a little more power, partly thanks to advances in racket technology, but fewer of them were playing into Hewitt's hands. Lleyton liked having a target near to the net, thanks to his speed and counterpuncher skills he destroyed volleyer`s game (Hewitt 9-1 Henman, Hewitt 3-1 Rafter, Hewitt 5-4 Sampras), his game was suitable against serve&volley players, but in his era guys (even tall and powerful like Cilic, Monfils, del Potro) stopped coming to the net and prefered to long rallies from baseline. But Lleyton did not have a powerful shots and he did not win a lot of points from baseline by himself. Hewitt was a victim of his time. If he would be 10 years older and his main opponents would be Sampras, Rafter and other s&v players, he could make even better career than Agassi, but against BIG3 his style was not suitable.
Was about to say 'oh no not another annoying video where the commentators speak over the action'.....then I realised it was Italian with the 'Mama Mia's' and everything; I think could listen to more Italian commentary if I'm being honest!
Penso che questi video sulle vittorie di Federer commentati da Clerici e Tommasi siano una delle esperienze più belle di youtube di sempre
E se mettessero proprio tutte le partite commentate da loro sarebbe l'estasi pura!
Tra tutte le partite che ho visto di Federer questa è la più incredibile, oserei dire perfetta. Da notare che nel secondo set conduceva 4-2 e 0-40 su servizio di Hewitt.
Look how amazing Federer's forehand was! I miss it. I think that's the biggest difference between the 2003-2009 Federer and the actual one.
Felipe Queiroga Fed's forehand was only in the state shown above from mid-2004 to 2006. Basically with the n-Code his forehand was the best shot of all time.
TheSaxophoneMan16 Exactly. His forehand started to change from 07 onwards. In 07 he hit with much more spin and not nearly as flat, then it continued in that direction in 08 with a huge loss of pace. His 04-06 FH was the greatest of all time.
gumbo Completely agree. However, it changed in 07, not 06. In 06 it hit his peak. By far the greatest shot of all time.
TheSaxophoneMan16 Agreed, I meant it changed FROM 06 to 07. I guess I worded that strangely. What do you think caused the drop off? I think a lot of it was intentional - he wanted more spin to get that elusive RG.
gumbo He changed his racket also
Gianni Clerici is a brilliant journalist and writer. His commentary is without equal
Chissà perché lo scrivi in inglese però. Io un idea ce l'ho.
@@lorenzomarchi6635 forse perché questo video è commentato da molti anglofoni che non conoscono Clerici, mentre per gli italiani sarebbe superfluo ricordare che enorme giornalista fosse?
@@glizingaridelbosco2137 Ma che ti frega che gli anglofoni conoscano Clerici? Tanto a loro non frega nulla, mentre noi già lo conosciamo. I giornalisti ed anche i tennisti e tutti gli addetti ai lavori internazionali lo conoscono. 500 anni di tennis è il libro più importante mai scritto sul tennis. Tradotto in svariate lingue.
@@lorenzomarchi6635 posso chiedere cosa frega a lei di eccepire al mio commento?
"Direi che vince Federer... MA NON FACILE!"
Le ultime parole famose...
I guess Im asking the wrong place but does anyone know of a way to log back into an Instagram account..?
I somehow forgot my login password. I appreciate any help you can offer me
@Travis Zahir instablaster :)
Le divinità del tennis incarnate in un sol uomo.
"Insomma 3/4 di Slam che è un buon segno" SÌ, ERA DAVVERO UN BUON SEGNO
Che bello risentire Tommasi e Clerici.....commentatori straordinari.
Il tennis di Roger, le telecronache di Tommasi e Clerici. Il meglio insomma.
oh man federer's forehand in his prime is amazing...!!!
Le urla di Gianni Clerici penso si sentano ancora in giro per il mondo...
Forse il Re ai suoi massimi livelli, ingiocabile tra gli anni 2004 -07
In effetti non aveva avversari… periodo più triste e buio della storia del tennis. Non per colpa sua sia chiaro
@@gianlucamazza222Non diciamo sciocchezze 😅
Magari avete iniziato a seguire da poco il tennis, ma gli avversari c'erano eccome. Esattamente come ci sono oggi, alcuni davvero grandi.
@@chuck1240 assolutamente grandissimi. Roddick, Hewitt, Nalbandian, Baghdatis e Safin che ha giocato con impegno 5 o 6 tornei in carriera. Agassi era ormai sul viale del tramonto ma si… Federer ha avuto grandissimi avversari 🤣🤣🤣🤣posa il fiasco amico
RF forehand whip in full effect. Also due to a lot faster court than nowadays.
IO INVECE DESIDEREREI CHE TROVASSE LA SEMIFINALE DI WIMBLEDON 2003 FEDERER VS RODDICK CON COMMENTO IN ITALIANO!LO STO DISPERATAMENTE CERCANDO!
anche i quarti contro hewitt... clerici aveva orgasmi multipli
DEVASTANTE. Non ci sono altri aggettivi... Sarebbe bello rivederlo in questa forma incontenibile..
ti rispondo 9 anni dopo xd , cmq è ancora qui il Maestro, 38 anni a insegnare tennis a quasi tutti
The commentary is so funny
+TheSaxophoneMan16 the best or nearly
You think it's funny, I think it's funny, but cultured, competent, elegant... In one word, brilliant
they are still both alive, 90 and 87 years old. 2 legend of Italian commentary
altro grandissimo video !!una curiosità...hai x caso anche le partite delle olimpiadi di pechino?
gia allora si capiva che era il piu forte di sempre. parola di esperti
Non mi sembra che lo abbiano detto in questa telecronaca.
E' sempre e solo Federer!!!
Where is this full match with HD quality?
To those who think Feds forehand is bigger here have to understand that Hewitt doesn't hit a big ball like Nadal or Djokovic so it gives Federer a bit more time to line up his shots.
My opinion - Hewitt would be more tough opponent for Federer (and Rafa & Nole) if he... could be physically stronger. He was SUPER fast, he had SUPER fighting spirit, he had fantastic serve return, technics, volleyer skills, BUT... He was physically weak. If he would have better and stronger serve, more powerful forehand and backhand, he could be competitive against BIG3.
The game in general also improved while Lleyton was at the top. Guys were playing with a little more power, partly thanks to advances in racket technology, but fewer of them were playing into Hewitt's hands. Lleyton liked having a target near to the net, thanks to his speed and counterpuncher skills he destroyed volleyer`s game (Hewitt 9-1 Henman, Hewitt 3-1 Rafter, Hewitt 5-4 Sampras), his game was suitable against serve&volley players, but in his era guys (even tall and powerful like Cilic, Monfils, del Potro) stopped coming to the net and prefered to long rallies from baseline. But Lleyton did not have a powerful shots and he did not win a lot of points from baseline by himself. Hewitt was a victim of his time. If he would be 10 years older and his main opponents would be Sampras, Rafter and other s&v players, he could make even better career than Agassi, but against BIG3 his style was not suitable.
So true!
Was about to say 'oh no not another annoying video where the commentators speak over the action'.....then I realised it was Italian with the 'Mama Mia's' and everything; I think could listen to more Italian commentary if I'm being honest!
Nice. 3:40
UUUUUUUU NON E' VERO....
3:50
I didn't know rape was allowed on youtube
The Italian is getting on my nerves.
Another proof of the weak 2001-2007 era 😂
"Mama mia.?
Mamma mia.
Fed was having his way in 2003, 04, 05, 06, 07, 09, without much challenge. That's why I love seeing Djokovic do that to him since 2014.
Djokovic now has no rival only next gens that are not able to beat the elders