EP

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 вер 2024
  • Criminal Defence Lawyers Joseph Neuberger, Michael Bury, and UA-cam personality, legal researcher and host of the UnTrue Crime podcast Diana Davison, sit down and discuss the aftermath of their trials and the emerging and alarming changes to our legal system. A behind the scenes inside look into real courtroom drama.
    Website: www.NotOnRecord...
    Sign up to our email list - eepurl.com/hw3g99
    Social Media Links
    Twitter: / notonrecord
    Instagram: / notonrecordpodcast
    TikTok: / notonrecordpodcast
    Facebook: / notonrecord
    Telegram: t.me/NotOnRecord
    Minds: www.minds.com/n...
    Audio Platforms
    Spotify: open.spotify.c...
    Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple...
    SoundCloud: / notonrecord
    Stitcher: www.stitcher.com/podcast/notonrecord
    Google Play: podcasts.googl...
    Video Platforms
    Bitchute: www.bitchute.c...
    Rumble: rumble.com/c/c...
    For more information on criminal law issues go to Neuberger & Partners LLP www.nrlawyers.com.
    Produced by Benjamin Dichter & Max Silverberg
    #notonrecord #law #lawyers

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @danymokhtar8775
    @danymokhtar8775 29 днів тому +1

    I am going through this myself at the moment I wanted a divorce and I am hit with a silver bullet
    Fighting for custody proforma after proforma and fighting false accusations in the criminal system +family court not an easy thing and very expensive
    There should be more awareness about this and the legal system in Canada is corrupt
    Thank you for the podcast

  • @davidevan2290
    @davidevan2290 28 днів тому +2

    An acquaintance in court had a his children's teacher , the landlady and a police officer testify on his behalf regarding assaults by his ex-wife. The ruling of the court? He was not to "associate with men's groups." We need only look to the forced resignation of a British Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, when it was discovered the police were withholding evidence from the accused and their defense. While I am unsure of current figures, 20 years ago women's organizations in Canada received half a billon dollars annually from various levels of government. Men's organizations received nothing. Until such time as MSM gets over their bias and interviews people such as Donald Dutton, I fear little progress will be made.

  • @haidner
    @haidner 29 днів тому +1

    I wish I had a lawyer like you when my kids' mom and I split up. Yeah, it's too late now. But it would have been worth every penny. She sounds a lot like the woman in this case.

  • @philliphickox4023
    @philliphickox4023 Місяць тому +4

    "Play Misty for me" a much earlier version of a male being stalked by a female. Staring Clint Eastwood.

  • @almightyhydra
    @almightyhydra Місяць тому +6

    Really do wish the police would prosecute false allegations a lot more vigorously. In too many cases do the false accusers either get off scott free ("we don't want to stop people coming forward" - well, stop enabling those who are belittling a legitimate victim by making up a false claim!) or with tiny sentences. Look at the Sarah Jane Parkinson case - her allegations cost the accused 400k AUD in legal fees, destroyed his family, and she got 3 years I think? Pathetic.
    False claims hurt those who are legitimate victims too, by diverting police/court resources and creating a societal uncertainty.
    The fact that false allegations can be used in some countries as a backdoor to a residence visa unfortunately makes things ten times worse. Getting deported and having to co-ordinate an international move on short notice is a worrisome, very stressful situation. No wonder people panic and make up a charge to get to stay in the country.

    • @tikaltoki4561
      @tikaltoki4561 29 днів тому

      They do not prosecute them on purpose. Feminist claim prosecuting them would harm real victims. Feminist clearly do not give a shit about lives of innocent men.

  • @richarddavid9353
    @richarddavid9353 27 днів тому

    This is why you can block numbers.

  • @ardvark8699
    @ardvark8699 Місяць тому +2

    Joseph and friends, I guaranty you the complainant in this case was being coached on what to say and do. A person or organization in Canada has told this woman what to do, to get her free house, and citizenship.
    The woman isn't crazy, shes just following someone else's instructions on how to get the house and remove the husband. Knowing the system is designed to give her what she wants.

    • @haidner
      @haidner 29 днів тому

      Nah. The crazies can be smart and figure it out themselves... Fairly common, actually.

  • @unknownknown2776
    @unknownknown2776 Місяць тому +4

    Remember, police are obligated to conduct a thorough investigation!!
    Charge her!! Bring a private prosecution! of Public Mischief and Sexual Assault!

    • @thetriumphsprint
      @thetriumphsprint Місяць тому +1

      That's unlikely to happen.

    • @ardvark8699
      @ardvark8699 Місяць тому +2

      the police can investigate all they want, its the crown that's refusing to press charges against false accusers.

    • @unknownknown2776
      @unknownknown2776 29 днів тому

      @@ardvark8699 That's why I suggested a Private Prosecution. You do know any citizen in Canada can walk into a courthouse and act as a prosecutor - right? If the Crown stays the charge then sue them for denying you your right to Equal Benefit and Protection under the law.

    • @unknownknown2776
      @unknownknown2776 29 днів тому

      @@thetriumphsprint What's unlikely, the police conducting a thorough investigation, or a victim bringing a Private Prosecution against the false accuser?

    • @ardvark8699
      @ardvark8699 29 днів тому +2

      @@unknownknown2776 both

  • @andrewcarter7260
    @andrewcarter7260 Місяць тому +2

    How is this prosecotion continuing. This is a case where the police and crown solicitor have not done their job. She needs to be charged with fraud , assault and spousal abuse.

    • @haidner
      @haidner 29 днів тому

      And immigration fraud.

  • @thetriumphsprint
    @thetriumphsprint Місяць тому +4

    Unfortunately your client should have engaged a lawyer very early, to negotiate with this maniac. Perhaps something men especially should consider. Here in Australia it seems women will almost immediately, in a seperation, get legal aid through our women's advisory centres. There are no men's advisory centres.

    • @AdelaideGuy1968
      @AdelaideGuy1968 Місяць тому +1

      Especially NSW. When the state government introduced legislation that legal aid funding would be provided for women who claim DV, The number of allegations exploded. Just look at Our Watch and their promoting the myth that women don't lie

    • @ardvark8699
      @ardvark8699 Місяць тому +4

      this is the problem with he says/she says. She gets the power of the government and social services behind her. He gets nothing.

    • @thedave7760
      @thedave7760 Місяць тому +2

      Gerard rennic and Pauline Hansen are the only ones who even acknowledg and want to fix it.

  • @martinbrousseau2560
    @martinbrousseau2560 Місяць тому

    Seems it happened to me where my ex n her husband both stalked me where she provided evidence to the court they were both stalking me n still stalking me… Sounds like I should watch Fatal Attraction.

  • @MagiMystik
    @MagiMystik Місяць тому

    It should be against the law, which means it can be prosecuted.

  • @OrwellsHousecat
    @OrwellsHousecat 27 днів тому

    Destiny?

  • @ardvark8699
    @ardvark8699 26 днів тому

    youtube stop removing my comments you monsters

  • @unknownknown2776
    @unknownknown2776 29 днів тому +4

    Look at the comments, particularly the responses to my comment about chariging false accusers. Men don't know how to fight!! And don't expect to win first time around either!! But imagine if every guy falsely accused sought criminal and/or civil action against false accusers. The judiciary starts to feel the heat. Judges stop saying things like "false accusations are rare". Over time, things turn around. But they certainly won't if you accept the status quo! Think women should be charged? Good - go ahead!!!
    Look at the feminists and learn from your enemies. If they gave up as easy as today's men and their lawyers who've resigned themselves to defeat, they wouldn't presently have the upper hand.

    • @ardvark8699
      @ardvark8699 29 днів тому +2

      this requires money, time and government resources, which men do not have. Also
      "The Public Prosecution is entitled to intervene on a private prosecution and can override anything done by the private prosecutor. [1] Intervention by the Attorney General in a private prosecution does not offend s. 7 of the Charter.[2]" So the crown can have your private case tossed before it ever goes to court.

    • @unknownknown2776
      @unknownknown2776 29 днів тому

      @@ardvark8699 Time - some. Gov resources? Money? For what? It's not that hard, you can do it yourself. Prep it over the weekend and take a morning off work to hit the courthouse!! Ask to see the JP. He'll set you up for a pre-hearing (called a pre-enquete) where you'll go over all your evidence. The Crown will argue against proceeding with charges, you'll argue for the charges. (This is to weed out frivilous or vexatious charges). If the JP refuses to issue process, appeal it to Superior Court.

    • @unknownknown2776
      @unknownknown2776 27 днів тому

      @@ardvark8699 imagine if every guy brought a private charge? They begin to feel the pressure and eventually relent. Also, learn from the left. They never let defeat stop them from trying over and over til they succeed. So your position is an excuse!

    • @ardvark8699
      @ardvark8699 26 днів тому

      @@unknownknown2776 no, the Trudeau gov. will just create a new law preventing men from doing this.

    • @ardvark8699
      @ardvark8699 26 днів тому

      @@unknownknown2776 They don't feel the pressure, they don't care. If thousands of men started making private prosecution claims, the Liberal government will just pass a law to prevent it. You think the Liberals are going to say "hmm these men have a issue maybe we should talk to them"