Pre 6.0 is where this game shined. World war 2 tanks were realistic and not ultra accurate in the move, you had to stop and aim your shots. After 6.0 my shots fly into narnia.
Prior to hearing this was a Tier 10 video, my first thought was "The Russian Tier 7 T43 must be on this list. Biggest disappointment ever after the glorious T34-85."
Yes on these for exactly the reasons you gave. I would add one more to the list of disappointments due to the PC version being too good (initially, before they modified it into a slightly different tank with a 3-round clip) and the console team nerfing it into crap: the Kranvagn. Now it only works if your opponent is a bot.
I sold my kranvagn. 2 marked it and couldn’t take the derpy gun anymore than has awful heat pen, awful standard pen. Awful gun handling. Sure good turret armor but whenever you use it, arty hits you. Or, you can’t hit a shot because derpy gun. I like my udes 15/16 a lot better
Console team have never nerfed Kranvagn....in fact, at one point it had better stats on console than on pc. But then pc version got buffed, then nerfed... Not quite sure if it's now better on pc with it's 3-shot magazine or here with it's old school 4-round magazine.
1:40 similar dpm? there is 700 difference. tier 10 does have 550 more hp, better traverse speed with hull and turret, better turret armor, much better accuracy, slightly better camo, there is nothing better about tier 9.
I dont know if youve experienced the updated unlock system but you dont get to pick, the game makes you unlock the k91 first which is just dissapointing i wish i couldve chosen which tank i unlock after grinding the 430 ii for so long, same thing with the conqeror i had to unlock the 215b b4 i could get the chieftan then the super conq., it makes you research in a certain order.
@@calvin4319 I am nearing my first tier 10 from the 430-2, but needing another like 200-300 thousand xp to get to the tank I actually care about is kinda demoralizing.
Chi ri worst tank in game. It's gigantic, slow, no armour, and weak pen. I grinded it, had good games, but they were few. Slow aim and you get penned by anything
@@fathertomahawk I haven't played it in probably 7 or 8 years, but when I had it it was quite good. It has no armor, but it was maneuverable and decently quick with a good damage output. I don't really remember the gun handling/pen but I know that I was confident enough in tier that the only thing that somewhat deterred me was a T29.
@hannuhauhonsalo2304 the camo rating with the net combined with commander skills brings it to the 260s, that's more than good enough for a speedy medium like the K91. Stealth and speed, what more could you ask for? And as for the DPM it has one of the best if not the best in the game so I don't know what you mean by that.
Because it has worse camo and worse DPM if you compare it to it's closest rivals, Object 140, Object 430 and T62A. What more I want? How about similar camo to Object 140 and fully rotating turret? If those two things got buffed I think it would become good tank, even though it has worse dpm than those tanks I mentioned.
@@hannuhauhonsalo2304 Most Soviet mediums have better than average dpm bit what makes the 91 stand out for me is its gun depression plus the decent camo, armor and dpm.
@@ConceitedCamelyt Good if you enjoy it. I find it pointless vehicle, other Soviet mediums are just better, only great thing it has is it's shell velocity.
Actually the fv215b used to actually have space armor on its and upper Hall and lower plate and it's turret as well like the super conquer but the devs removed it after people were complaining that the tank was just too powerful and it was during the time when we had the co-op game modes it was supposed to be the HD upgrade like the PC had but it was just too powerful and they had to remove it
The FV-215B was really good when first released. I really enjoyed playing it 5 years ago. I think the problem is, like with most of the old tier 10’s, is power creep.
The 30B feels so buttery smooth to play, yet so utterly capped at a LOWER performance ceiling than the tank before it. That tumor is probably the single biggest problem with it.
While true, just like the K-91, one-trick ponies don’t make a tank great. Well, I guess that’s not true, but the negatives that you don’t get with the rest of the line are what make them disappointed. I also love the FV and have consistent games in mine; however, I try not to look through the lens of a Unicum when making these videos to not steer the common players wrong.
@CloneGuy oh absolutely as a half decent player myself I wholeheartedly would say to newer players to avoid most British lines like the plague and to grind a soviet heavy instead. Lord knows my first tier X tech tree tanks was an IS-4.
It’s funny I play the Pz7 better than e100, and actually enjoy it more. I do a lot better in the pz7, but I agree the module damage is annoying. Also the k91 is awesome, you just play it like a leopard where you play mid to far and do awesome
I don't have the 60tp, but it was on the short list of tanks I wanted that I didn't have. Now that the new premium heavy is out I feel like I'm just not gonna bother.
@@Tendol23 the leopard is good. I used to prefer the stb-1, but with the 360 gun and siege change as well as the leopard getting the 420 really makes the leopard feel way better.
Wait 268 v4 got armor nerf in form of its weak points being nerfed last I checked and 263 has the same armor as always right? And the 268 after the 704 has the same armor as always🤔
You are correct about the V4 and 263. The 268 had its superstructure buffed a couple years back and that has made a huge difference. The front pike also went from 110mm to 140mm just like the Version 5
@@CloneGuyUmm, I believe your memory is failing you... Object 268's armor has not been buffed, ever. However, Object 268 V5's armor got buffed few years ago.
It’s easier to 2 and 3 mark tanks most players suck in or don’t play/ research I hope you know that this comment is not a flex. That doesn’t make the tank good or in the top 10 tanks in the game. The best tanks that are played the most and by the best players would be harder to mark.
It might be “better” but only just so. Because it’s boxy and everyone spams premium, it gets penned a lot more that the 268’s angled armor. This is my own experience
Don't slander my fave t10! The 215b is so much more fun than the chieftain and sconq, having over 50 maches in all and over 100 in the chief, the 215b is by far more enjoyable.
Your personal level of fun will never equate to an objective fact about a tank not being disappointing. The ammo count alone is enough to make the 215b a let down.
@@MTLS-1G14 my issue with the 215B is that it just doesn't feel as good to play as all the other British and it plays completely differently. Most of the British mediums and heavies are about being hull down and using downward to not have to expose weak points. then there is the 215B and it is a side scraper that struggles because it can't shot trade like a pz VII or a 705A.
I’ve heard about this but have yet to see the results. The issue is they didn’t touch parts like the gun armor. The parts they buffed were the parts unnecessary
@@CloneGuyImo, that weakspot armor buff really made a big difference. I know that it's mantlet still has that weakness but most players don't even know that weakspot, plus it's a such a small weakspot it's quite difficult to hit.
Pre 6.0 is where this game shined. World war 2 tanks were realistic and not ultra accurate in the move, you had to stop and aim your shots. After 6.0 my shots fly into narnia.
Prior to hearing this was a Tier 10 video, my first thought was "The Russian Tier 7 T43 must be on this list. Biggest disappointment ever after the glorious T34-85."
I’ll be working on a lower tier version soon
Playing Wot console is a disappointment in itself like c'mon it's not like the developers want the game to be enjoyable or something 😂😂😂
I actually love the wz-113g after the armor buff as the whole line was just abysmal
Yes on these for exactly the reasons you gave. I would add one more to the list of disappointments due to the PC version being too good (initially, before they modified it into a slightly different tank with a 3-round clip) and the console team nerfing it into crap: the Kranvagn. Now it only works if your opponent is a bot.
I’ve never had the pleasure to play one myself, but once my garage expands some more, I’m sure the list will also
I sold my kranvagn. 2 marked it and couldn’t take the derpy gun anymore than has awful heat pen, awful standard pen. Awful gun handling. Sure good turret armor but whenever you use it, arty hits you. Or, you can’t hit a shot because derpy gun. I like my udes 15/16 a lot better
Console team have never nerfed Kranvagn....in fact, at one point it had better stats on console than on pc. But then pc version got buffed, then nerfed... Not quite sure if it's now better on pc with it's 3-shot magazine or here with it's old school 4-round magazine.
1:40 similar dpm? there is 700 difference. tier 10 does have 550 more hp, better traverse speed with hull and turret, better turret armor, much better accuracy, slightly better camo, there is nothing better about tier 9.
I dont know if youve experienced the updated unlock system but you dont get to pick, the game makes you unlock the k91 first which is just dissapointing i wish i couldve chosen which tank i unlock after grinding the 430 ii for so long, same thing with the conqeror i had to unlock the 215b b4 i could get the chieftan then the super conq., it makes you research in a certain order.
I have not experienced it yet but that sounds awful! Thanks for sharing
@@calvin4319 I am nearing my first tier 10 from the 430-2, but needing another like 200-300 thousand xp to get to the tank I actually care about is kinda demoralizing.
You my friend have just been "bamboozled" 😂
I definitely was happy with the chi-ri, but the sta-1 and type 61 were kinda mediocre and the stb-1 was good, but the siege mode makes it awkward.
Yes both are very disappointing.
Chi ri worst tank in game. It's gigantic, slow, no armour, and weak pen. I grinded it, had good games, but they were few. Slow aim and you get penned by anything
@@fathertomahawk I haven't played it in probably 7 or 8 years, but when I had it it was quite good. It has no armor, but it was maneuverable and decently quick with a good damage output. I don't really remember the gun handling/pen but I know that I was confident enough in tier that the only thing that somewhat deterred me was a T29.
@@fathertomahawk The bar is just as bad. The thing has 0 degrees of gun depression lol
The K 91 is underrated if you slap a camo net on it you get all the benefits of a TD along with a medium tank with OP DPM and decent armor
But you still have worse camo and worse DPM than most other Soviet mediums.
@hannuhauhonsalo2304 the camo rating with the net combined with commander skills brings it to the 260s, that's more than good enough for a speedy medium like the K91. Stealth and speed, what more could you ask for? And as for the DPM it has one of the best if not the best in the game so I don't know what you mean by that.
Because it has worse camo and worse DPM if you compare it to it's closest rivals, Object 140, Object 430 and T62A. What more I want? How about similar camo to Object 140 and fully rotating turret? If those two things got buffed I think it would become good tank, even though it has worse dpm than those tanks I mentioned.
@@hannuhauhonsalo2304 Most Soviet mediums have better than average dpm bit what makes the 91 stand out for me is its gun depression plus the decent camo, armor and dpm.
@@ConceitedCamelyt Good if you enjoy it. I find it pointless vehicle, other Soviet mediums are just better, only great thing it has is it's shell velocity.
Actually the fv215b used to actually have space armor on its and upper Hall and lower plate and it's turret as well like the super conquer but the devs removed it after people were complaining that the tank was just too powerful and it was during the time when we had the co-op game modes it was supposed to be the HD upgrade like the PC had but it was just too powerful and they had to remove it
The FV-215B was really good when first released. I really enjoyed playing it 5 years ago. I think the problem is, like with most of the old tier 10’s, is power creep.
Don't matter I can slap in any tank 💪🏻💪🏻 I actually like some of the tanks on this list
The 30B feels so buttery smooth to play, yet so utterly capped at a LOWER performance ceiling than the tank before it. That tumor is probably the single biggest problem with it.
I think they JUST buffed the sidescraping triangle on the FV215b which helps it a BIT. Same with the PZ VII.
While true, just like the K-91, one-trick ponies don’t make a tank great. Well, I guess that’s not true, but the negatives that you don’t get with the rest of the line are what make them disappointed. I also love the FV and have consistent games in mine; however, I try not to look through the lens of a Unicum when making these videos to not steer the common players wrong.
@CloneGuy oh absolutely as a half decent player myself I wholeheartedly would say to newer players to avoid most British lines like the plague and to grind a soviet heavy instead. Lord knows my first tier X tech tree tanks was an IS-4.
I remember getting the kranvagn and thinking i wasted my time and money. Definitely my nomination for a list like this.
The Rhinocerante should've made this list. I prefer my pz KPFW VII or 30B over that tank.
You are wrong about one thing: Object 268's armor has not been buffed. It's view range, hitpoints, gun arc and gun has been buffed but not it's armor.
It’s funny I play the Pz7 better than e100, and actually enjoy it more. I do a lot better in the pz7, but I agree the module damage is annoying. Also the k91 is awesome, you just play it like a leopard where you play mid to far and do awesome
Calling the 215b and the Wz disappointing is an interesting take for sure when tanks like 60tp and the hori 3 exists
60tp is a monster
@ now we’re just lying for fun
@NotWlzzyyyyy idk what your talking about
@@sodmadhaven tank is trash. Slow, no dpm, meh armour and the gun is trash
I don't have the 60tp, but it was on the short list of tanks I wanted that I didn't have. Now that the new premium heavy is out I feel like I'm just not gonna bother.
Great content. You saved me from grinding stb 1.
Thank you
I’m happy to help! If you haven’t ground the Leopard 1 yet, that’s the one I would grab to replace the STB grind
@@Tendol23 the leopard is good. I used to prefer the stb-1, but with the 360 gun and siege change as well as the leopard getting the 420 really makes the leopard feel way better.
A lot of lines just have better tier 9s, sometimes because those 9s can face 7s its just good to get to them and end it there
Everything after update 6.0 has been a disappointment. The game developers are horrible
The good developers moved to Warships when that came to console.
I vibe with the k91 for some reason. The gun depression is decent, camo is hardly noticeably different then the other russian 10's.
Yep, right on all of these
Not me I just grinded to my first tier 10 on this account and got the t110e4. It was worth the suck ass grind
Would you do a video like this but for other tiers?
Yes, I’m compiling a list right now!
Not the FV215B MAN!! 😑
Wait 268 v4 got armor nerf in form of its weak points being nerfed last I checked and 263 has the same armor as always right? And the 268 after the 704 has the same armor as always🤔
You are correct about the V4 and 263. The 268 had its superstructure buffed a couple years back and that has made a huge difference. The front pike also went from 110mm to 140mm just like the Version 5
@CloneGuy well...thought it always had that glad I was corrected
@@CloneGuyUmm, I believe your memory is failing you... Object 268's armor has not been buffed, ever. However, Object 268 V5's armor got buffed few years ago.
Pz. V/IV, AVRE, Vigilante, Bourrasque....
Oh, you are talking about tech tree tanks!
Jackpot, i have all this Tanks 😂
The French tumor 😂😂😂
Bro every tank u said was bad I literally 2 or 3 marked 😂 super unicum stats in them too
Congrats! 3-marking is always a blast!
@@CloneGuy I hate it
It’s easier to 2 and 3 mark tanks most players suck in or don’t play/ research I hope you know that this comment is not a flex. That doesn’t make the tank good or in the top 10 tanks in the game. The best tanks that are played the most and by the best players would be harder to mark.
As of today the whole game is one big disappointment
Not play console tanks in years, it's nice to know 10s is a slow reload 😂😂, I play alot of warships where ships have upwards of 40s reloads 😂
True. How about some Warships on the channel soon?
Wz 113 has amazing armor it’s better than the 268 much better
It might be “better” but only just so. Because it’s boxy and everyone spams premium, it gets penned a lot more that the 268’s angled armor. This is my own experience
Don't slander my fave t10! The 215b is so much more fun than the chieftain and sconq, having over 50 maches in all and over 100 in the chief, the 215b is by far more enjoyable.
Your personal level of fun will never equate to an objective fact about a tank not being disappointing. The ammo count alone is enough to make the 215b a let down.
@@MTLS-1G14 my issue with the 215B is that it just doesn't feel as good to play as all the other British and it plays completely differently. Most of the British mediums and heavies are about being hull down and using downward to not have to expose weak points. then there is the 215B and it is a side scraper that struggles because it can't shot trade like a pz VII or a 705A.
The game imo is disappointing in itself.
How do you make these tanks look good😂
It's mostly about positioning. Any tank will look good when it's allowed to shoot without being shot at
Damn no 15/16.
Udes if fun
I haven’t unlocked it yet so I wouldn’t be able to give an honest opinion
They buffed the heel out of the pz 7 it has a shit ton of armor they actually buffed it more than the pc armor wise
I’ve heard about this but have yet to see the results. The issue is they didn’t touch parts like the gun armor. The parts they buffed were the parts unnecessary
@@CloneGuyImo, that weakspot armor buff really made a big difference. I know that it's mantlet still has that weakness but most players don't even know that weakspot, plus it's a such a small weakspot it's quite difficult to hit.