IW had a good story and was very interesting and even has one of the best egg like a super egg Mephistopheles! and also having Director Cut, it’s like the best reward of all games
For me the zombies part is the only one worth of playing this year. The multiplayer is horrible, and only worth of playing for leveling a gun fast enough. The ester eggs are good, and you can play it solo, so yes, it's a good zombie game.
For me BO4 wasn’t what I enjoyed. Found myself flocking back to bo3. They diddnt change the game in good way imo. But bo6 is fun so far and the potential could be very good. 😌 but I respect your opinion on bo4. It probs gets more hate because of how bo3 did and our expectations were so high. Stand alone it’s not as bad as everyone says.
@@M3rc_same with me, I played the absolute shit out of every treyarch zombies game (not including vanguard and mwz) except for bo4. There was something about it that just has never hit with me. I’ve tried to get into it countless times due to how much more praise it gets recently but I just don’t enjoy it. I’ve played enjoyed bo6 more than any zombies since bo3 already.
@@M3rc_ I think the community is the problem. We accept lazy copy-paste games, paying for them and defending them. If we compare BO6 to BO2/3/4 we mention that we have less maps, less detail, less difficulty and less variation, but we have more grind, more easy side EE's, more skins, more collectables. So the game is made out of different copied parts from other COD's but instead of putting efford in the development to make good new content, they make the game more grindy and addictive and put all the efford into the shop to sell more skins. And sadly it works, the people overhyping BO6 like it's black ops 2, but it's just a cold war reskin with adjustments and gobblegums. To sum up, it's a game packed with old revitalized features, reused content and mechanics and on top it's unbalanced as hell.
Black ops 4 was decent loved the ix Easter egg and voyage of despair, WW2 was dope too, i didn't like the futuristic zombies on modern warfare kicking old school in king der toten 😎
bo6 is just cold war 2.0 without bringing anything new to the table despite spending the most time in development. It reuses so many boss enemies with only 2 new unique ones. Liberty falls is probably the worst zombies map of all time IMO, with the map being repetitive with infinite training spots that make it impossible to die with the only challenge coming from the bullet sponge enemies. Liberty Falls has neither the wunderwaffe or Richofen despite the trailer and probably has one of the most underwhelming easter eggs of all time. Also Samantha is annoying af now and the dialogue is insufferable and makes no sense. The game doesn't even fix the problems of cold war like the terrible new point, loadout, and pack a punch system that force you into using 1 weapon for the entire game and make it near impossible to switch weapons and makes the progression a slog. This includes the same yapping NPCs as Cold War that breaks the immersion. The game also leans more into the lazy warzone and multiplayer mechanics like armor and scorestreaks. The game feels like it's pandering to zombies fans by centering the marketing around the return of round-based zombies and bringing back gobblegums without understanding what actually makes zombies good. Credit where credit is due, Terminus does have a pretty good final boss fight.
Couldn't have said it better myself. The game is so overhyped and I'm not entirely sure why but I would blame game pass making it so accessible. It does everything cold war did except worse? I feel like the armor system makes it feel like warzone and getting past round 30 is just boring and hell due to the sheer amount of reused boss zombies that come every round. I think it's better than cold war, but I'd still rank them both C tier. I think mechanically they have great ideas, I like the augment system. They have 0 personality, and I cannot find any reason to play either game casually. I can load up der eisendrache, I can load up zombies in spaceland just for fun and have a great time but these games? The only reason I play is for the camo grind, once I'm done with that I have 0 reason to play.
A lot of good points here, I agree some of the marketing has been suspect. And I did expect to see certain things in the game. I hope they bring them in. I still think this is a good zombies imo. Consider what we’ve had in recent years it’s pretty decent. bo3 will always reign supreme tho 💪💪 appreciate the comment bro 👊
IW had a good story and was very interesting and even has one of the best egg like a super egg Mephistopheles! and also having Director Cut, it’s like the best reward of all games
For me the zombies part is the only one worth of playing this year. The multiplayer is horrible, and only worth of playing for leveling a gun fast enough. The ester eggs are good, and you can play it solo, so yes, it's a good zombie game.
Agreed
291 views is crazy this video is super good
Ty 🙏
do you play with motion blur or depth of field on bruhhhh
Depth of field is alright. Motion blur always looks terrible in games to me.
🤷🏻♂️
Ranking bo6 above bo4 is crazy. 8 well designed maps with long main EE's against 2 maps with easy casual EE's
For me BO4 wasn’t what I enjoyed. Found myself flocking back to bo3. They diddnt change the game in good way imo. But bo6 is fun so far and the potential could be very good. 😌 but I respect your opinion on bo4. It probs gets more hate because of how bo3 did and our expectations were so high. Stand alone it’s not as bad as everyone says.
@@M3rc_same with me, I played the absolute shit out of every treyarch zombies game (not including vanguard and mwz) except for bo4. There was something about it that just has never hit with me. I’ve tried to get into it countless times due to how much more praise it gets recently but I just don’t enjoy it. I’ve played enjoyed bo6 more than any zombies since bo3 already.
@ exactly how I feel 💪💪 I don’t thing any game is “bad” but personal enjoyment. This is the MOST fun I’ve had since bo3
@@M3rc_ I think the community is the problem. We accept lazy copy-paste games, paying for them and defending them. If we compare BO6 to BO2/3/4 we mention that we have less maps, less detail, less difficulty and less variation, but we have more grind, more easy side EE's, more skins, more collectables. So the game is made out of different copied parts from other COD's but instead of putting efford in the development to make good new content, they make the game more grindy and addictive and put all the efford into the shop to sell more skins. And sadly it works, the people overhyping BO6 like it's black ops 2, but it's just a cold war reskin with adjustments and gobblegums. To sum up, it's a game packed with old revitalized features, reused content and mechanics and on top it's unbalanced as hell.
Black ops 4 was decent loved the ix Easter egg and voyage of despair, WW2 was dope too, i didn't like the futuristic zombies on modern warfare kicking old school in king der toten 😎
bo6 is just cold war 2.0 without bringing anything new to the table despite spending the most time in development. It reuses so many boss enemies with only 2 new unique ones.
Liberty falls is probably the worst zombies map of all time IMO, with the map being repetitive with infinite training spots that make it impossible to die with the only challenge coming from the bullet sponge enemies. Liberty Falls has neither the wunderwaffe or Richofen despite the trailer and probably has one of the most underwhelming easter eggs of all time. Also Samantha is annoying af now and the dialogue is insufferable and makes no sense.
The game doesn't even fix the problems of cold war like the terrible new point, loadout, and pack a punch system that force you into using 1 weapon for the entire game and make it near impossible to switch weapons and makes the progression a slog. This includes the same yapping NPCs as Cold War that breaks the immersion. The game also leans more into the lazy warzone and multiplayer mechanics like armor and scorestreaks.
The game feels like it's pandering to zombies fans by centering the marketing around the return of round-based zombies and bringing back gobblegums without understanding what actually makes zombies good.
Credit where credit is due, Terminus does have a pretty good final boss fight.
Couldn't have said it better myself. The game is so overhyped and I'm not entirely sure why but I would blame game pass making it so accessible. It does everything cold war did except worse? I feel like the armor system makes it feel like warzone and getting past round 30 is just boring and hell due to the sheer amount of reused boss zombies that come every round. I think it's better than cold war, but I'd still rank them both C tier. I think mechanically they have great ideas, I like the augment system. They have 0 personality, and I cannot find any reason to play either game casually. I can load up der eisendrache, I can load up zombies in spaceland just for fun and have a great time but these games? The only reason I play is for the camo grind, once I'm done with that I have 0 reason to play.
A lot of good points here, I agree some of the marketing has been suspect. And I did expect to see certain things in the game. I hope they bring them in. I still think this is a good zombies imo. Consider what we’ve had in recent years it’s pretty decent. bo3 will always reign supreme tho 💪💪 appreciate the comment bro 👊
No views is wild
Someone’s clearly mad… 🤣
Making a comment like that for a new UA-camr is wild
It ain’t good bro it’s just cope
I think it’s good, but I respect the opinion