Architecture: The Stuff That's Hard to Change - Dylan Beattie

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 чер 2019
  • We’ve all heard of the idea of ‘software architecture’. We’ve read books about domain-driven design and event sourcing, we’ve been to conferences and learned about micro services and REST APIs. Some of us remember working with n-tiers and stored procedures… some of us are still using them. But the role of a systems architect is still one of the most misunderstood things about the software development process. What does the architect actually do? If you’re working with a systems architect, what can you expect from them? And if you are a systems architect, what are your team expecting from you?
    In this talk, Dylan will share his own insights into the idea of architecture as part of a software development process. We’ll explore some popular architectural patterns and processes - and a couple of obscure ones as well - and look at how, and when, you can incorporate those patterns into your own projects. We’ll talk about how the idea of software architecture has changed over time, and share some tips and advice for developers who find themselves working with architecture as part of their role.
    Check out more of our talks in the following links!
    NDC Conferences
    ndcoslo.com
    ndcconferences.com
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 76

  • @chuckyb9469
    @chuckyb9469 4 роки тому +351

    Came here after watching " the art of code".

  • @steveyuhas9278
    @steveyuhas9278 Рік тому +67

    I'm currently on a binge of all Dylan's NDC talks. Just came from "the web that never was". I love these talks so much.

    • @cjnewbs
      @cjnewbs 9 місяців тому +1

      I’ve just binged about 5 now. Amazing speaker!

    • @chriskeller5226
      @chriskeller5226 8 місяців тому

      I think Im up to about 7 in the last 2 days. How does he do it? Every subject is great. @@cjnewbs

  • @beeble2003
    @beeble2003 2 роки тому +18

    4:30 "And it's only software and buildings that have architects. There aren't aeroplane architects or racing car architects or plumbing architects."
    Doesn't affect the larger point, but ships are designed by naval architects.

    • @kaiserruhsam
      @kaiserruhsam 11 місяців тому +5

      ships are just buildings that are intended to float

    • @IanBLacy
      @IanBLacy 10 місяців тому +2

      @@kaiserruhsamnot just buildings, whole-ass cities

  • @striker865
    @striker865 5 років тому +78

    This was the most real and honest talk I've heard in a while. I understand the architecture perspective better now. Thank you.

    • @TheOceanLoader
      @TheOceanLoader 2 роки тому

      Dylan Beattie is one of my favourite talkers. He may be a bit too glib for some people, but that guy has definitely improved my consideration and solidified my comprehension of development.

  • @funkenjoyer
    @funkenjoyer 2 місяці тому

    Man how good is this guy that I've sat through 45 min talk and I feel cheated because it wasn't 1h long

  • @reginaldwalker4407
    @reginaldwalker4407 5 років тому +25

    Excellent talk, you had me smiling and nodding along. If I could I'd buy you drink. I especially found the prohibition against architects writing product code useful. There is a great temptation when you 'see' something new that has to be built and you are too impatient to change the formal design.

  • @mellertid
    @mellertid 5 місяців тому +1

    "Allow it to emerge". That applies to many areas, I think.
    When (not) to intervene may be more important than how.

  • @hemantsharma5893
    @hemantsharma5893 2 роки тому +2

    you nailed it. Its to the point but in detail as well. Lots of problem covered about architecture roles and responsibility. I liked the example you provided on reminding the value that developers are delivering.

  • @NevadaWilliford
    @NevadaWilliford 2 роки тому +8

    Great talk. These are the kinds of talks that have legs. I can see myself watching this again next year while having coffee on a Sunday morning.
    It's close to 3 years later and it's interesting considering some of these points after coming through the pandemic. The ideas about teams organizing around tech stack or geography for example.
    Overall I appreciate the down to earth manner in which it was presented. Often architecture talks tend toward big words and abstractions to allow architects feel important and superior to "normal" developers and business people.

  • @cat-.-
    @cat-.- 2 роки тому +6

    Effective immediately you've been promoted to the role of the device driver. You're now responsible for driving the devices!
    -- Boss

  • @coder8515
    @coder8515 3 роки тому +9

    Great content, great speaker. Love your references and quotes. Funny use of south park characters. Last year I've partially designed and developed a cloud deployment tool (for my org internal use). It's different from an enterprise application but principles exposed here can be applied the same.

  • @iwanjones4705
    @iwanjones4705 Рік тому +1

    A story told with joy and passion. Loved it

  • @catalinstan3423
    @catalinstan3423 2 роки тому

    really good stuff here! This guy is awersome

  • @NickRoman
    @NickRoman Рік тому

    26:48 😆 that drawing really cracked me up. I really like the word rectabular.

  • @kps2642
    @kps2642 2 роки тому

    Really good talk!

  • @shelivsbaxters
    @shelivsbaxters 3 роки тому +1

    Brilliant !

  • @danielscott4514
    @danielscott4514 2 роки тому +7

    There is another kind of architect out there: the naval architect (not to be confused with a navel architect - that discipline is just pure fluff)

  • @user-rd9xk7ut7p
    @user-rd9xk7ut7p Місяць тому

    Where can i find the talk mentioned at 20:31

  • @ayoubdkhissi
    @ayoubdkhissi Рік тому

    Great Talk!

  • @tOmzz4video
    @tOmzz4video 3 роки тому

    great talk

  • @eddyecko94
    @eddyecko94 4 роки тому +8

    Great stuff. I enjoyed it even as a background noise.

  • @dratir
    @dratir 2 роки тому +3

    "The guy who designed the Brookly Bridge did not build it by himself"
    [citation needed]

  • @kapilpatel9379
    @kapilpatel9379 5 місяців тому

    Interesting talk :)

  • @billiardsforum8338
    @billiardsforum8338 3 роки тому +1

    Officer Barbrady as "Systems Architect" - HILARIOUS

  • @codyheiner3636
    @codyheiner3636 Рік тому +1

    What is "Moss ed" (?) referenced around 21:03?

  • @ronnieglendinning
    @ronnieglendinning 3 роки тому +1

    Naval Architect!

  • @MiMi-pb8sq
    @MiMi-pb8sq 2 роки тому +1

    Anyone know NDC meaning?. Thank you.

  • @gregf9160
    @gregf9160 3 роки тому +5

    Is F sharp still a thing? I thought they had killed it. Never actually met someone who ever used it or worked in any organisation where it was used, ever.

    • @baopham392
      @baopham392 3 роки тому

      I was interviewed by a company for an internship position in 2018 which requires me to code in F sharp. Luckily, I did not get it :). I believe that it is good to know many programming languages. But... why F sharp, when we have C/C++, Python, JS :D

    • @protowalker
      @protowalker 3 роки тому +3

      @@baopham392 because functional programming is a better choice in a lot of circumstances

    • @salvatoreshiggerino6810
      @salvatoreshiggerino6810 3 роки тому +2

      I asked a really pushy .NET recruiter to find me a job in F#. Never heard from him again.

    • @Qrzychu92
      @Qrzychu92 2 роки тому +1

      It is a thing! it even got new version and tooling in .NET 6

    • @yvrelna
      @yvrelna 2 роки тому

      F# is what you get if you're a corporate programmer that wants to develop in a functional programming language, but too chicken to actually develop in a real functional language like Haskell. Or you're just .NET shill.
      #roast

  • @Stopinvadingmyhardware
    @Stopinvadingmyhardware 2 роки тому

    Without touching the architecture

  • @H.D.83
    @H.D.83 10 місяців тому

    No racecar architects? Adrian Newey would like to have a word

    • @lukealadeen7836
      @lukealadeen7836 9 місяців тому +1

      He is an engineer, Aeronautics engineer or simply an aerodynamicist

  • @hhhpestock951
    @hhhpestock951 5 місяців тому +1

    there -- are -- Matrix architects..

  • @poodlelord
    @poodlelord 3 роки тому +4

    touch screens are still a disaster...

    • @realReyLopez
      @realReyLopez 6 місяців тому

      Exactly. Either lagging, constantly in need of calibration or over-responsive. I hate them, especially in cars. I want my buttons back!

  • @gns2soma977
    @gns2soma977 3 роки тому

    The delicate powder objectively fasten because employer simplistically influence failing a fantastic need. resolute, unsightly shrine

  • @diligencehumility6971
    @diligencehumility6971 2 роки тому

    As soon as someone says they believe in the moon landings, I start to hear circus music in the background

  • @carlyoung2512
    @carlyoung2512 3 роки тому

    The ratty orange cytogenetically correct because coil inspiringly sip out a strong metal. well-to-do, horrible smell

  • @lextr3110
    @lextr3110 5 років тому +1

    ndc have gone down the drain..

    • @theorderoforange
      @theorderoforange 3 роки тому +5

      what makes you say that?

    • @nachiketh3650
      @nachiketh3650 3 роки тому +4

      Huh?

    • @gagaxueguzheng
      @gagaxueguzheng 2 роки тому +8

      I don't know about NDC in the past but I enjoyed this talk and "The Art of Code". I found them entertaining, although they didn't revolutionize my thinking and also didn't teach me many things I didn't already know. To me, the videos served their purpose to entertain me while I'm sitting here with a beer.