I've heard a few complaints about the $10 billion cost of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). But that was over 10 years, which was $3 per American per year. I'd call that a bargain for what we hope to be revolutionary discoveries.
Quite frankly space is the next frontier and if the U.S keeps cutting nasas budget while other superpowers are spending more on space we are pretty much doomed
@@mypud4068 I was curious how NASA's budget has changed over the years, so I googled it. I found a Wikipedia page titled "Budget of NASA." It has a chart with the totals adjusted to today's dollars. Aside from the '60s, it's surprisingly consistent.
@@JPMadden when we were in the space race it accounted for 5% of the budget and now a days its about a half a percent. The last time they were at even 1% was the early 90s, if you want to get ahead in space R and D that's just a sad number. It should realistically be at about 1%
@@mypud4068 I agree NASA should have a larger budget. That chart I mentioned shows that in the last 30 years, their budget has declined from 1% to 0.5% of the total federal budget, despite the dollar amount declining by only about 10%. This is a reflection of the huge increases in defense, health care, and interest on the national debt since 1990. Years ago, I read an article listing some surprising things that the federal government spends more on than NASA. The one I remember was air conditioning for our military bases in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The moon of Jupiter he mentioned, Io, is pronounced "Eye-O" not "Low". The cloud storm over Saturn's northern pole is a perfect hexagonal shape. It looks too perfect to be natural but, it is. Europa, one of Jupiter's moons, is believed to contain a water ocean under its frozen surface containing more than twice the water of Earth and could contain life. If you were to land on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, or Neptune, you wouldn't be able to "stand" on those planets because there is no solid surface. They're gas planets w a solid core deep at the center. Surrounding the Solar System is the Oort Cloud which also orbits the Sun, it will take Voyager 1 another 20,000 years to finally exit the Solar System.
My brain melted a little bit when he mispronounced Io, though Bright Side is an astonishingly inaccurate "educational" channel, so I'm not totally surprised.
@@mypud4068 lol it is a telescope, but to be a space telescope it has to be a satellite. A satellite is an object placed into orbit. Satellite doesn't mean a specific purpose, satellites of all kinds are in orbit
The size of our own galaxy is pretty much impossible for the human brain to process. Yes, it can be measured with numbers, but these numbers become almost meaningless. And then you realize..... oh there are countless galaxies. The interesting part is realizing that there is so much space that anything you can imagine, it probably exists. But then you go down the rabbit hole wondering what existed before time and matter and you start getting into the freaky/existential stuff.
Millie has it all figured out. LOL!! Of course you will be her pet dog someday. You two are getting married, right? No comment on a lot of this stuff in this video.
1:50 or what's more scary, is if you end up falling in love with a person in your currently life who in a past life that person caused your death, either accidentally or intentional. this talk kind of reminds me of the Egg Theory that Kurzgesagt made a video about.
The mars info might be wrong. Since the insight lander recorded several earthquakes on mars in the 5.0 range. So mars may have plate tectonics causing these earthquakes.
There are a lot of misleading things in the way Bright Side does their videos. In this video they failed to use scale images in some comparisons, provide enough background information, and even got placement wrong. The animated storm on Jupiter was one of them as it was not only much bigger than the Great Red Spot but you could actually see the Great Red Spot to the left of it. Another thing was that they said Neptune was hiding Planet Nine as if it was sitting right behind it. This is not what anyone believes. The Planet Nine theories are based on the odd orbits of several dwarf planets beyond Pluto as well as Neptune's and Pluto's seemingly perturbed orbits. Pluto's elliptical orbit actually comes within the orbit of Neptune at one point (closer to the sun than Neptune). Computer models made to attempt to explain these strange orbits hint at the possible existence of a large planet far out in the Kuiper Belt.
@@davidheiser2225 There are some good sources out there that do a good job at trying to explain what "we know" and what "we think" may be going on in the world of science discovery. But it is hard for reactors to always find them without people recommending them. Otherwise all they have to go on is a clickbait title like Brightside uses.
the moon of Saturn starts with an I, as in Iapetus, who was one of the Titans in Greek Mythology, not Lapetus. The capital I we use really needs to have the top and bottom bars like the Roman numeral 1 does (I can't recreate the roman 1 on my laptop, sorry), because many people get this wrong by accident
And Jupiter's moon Io is called "Lo" in the video. And what's with that red swirly thing they're showing as the Great Red Spot? Videos like this make people stupider.
I agree with David. Though some of the information in Bright Side's video is correct, overall the channel excels at creating misleading content. I would recommend other channels.
It's weird that the video actually shows the Great Red Spot on the left of the image but puts this weird hurricane graphic over the planet. That also isn't a proper scale size for Earth compared to Jupiter.
I studied astronomy in my free time and I know quite a bit. I don't believe he mentioned the Oort Cloud, it is really fascinating. Y'all should research it.
James, did you break Millie's finger? 😂 If there are more advanced entities in the universe (which is a given by the Fermi hypothesi and the Drake equation and absolutely would be certain if they can travel here,) they would see us like we look at ants, and probably pass us by as they would see us as either violent and/or primitive or they would destroy us for the planets resources
Even though the winds on Venus are hefty, if he were to build floating cities (like Cloud City in Star Wars) the winds would be perfectly still because we'd be moving with them.
There were some things Bright Side got wrong in this video, but no worries. If you really want to have your minds blown about space, you should check out "How the Universe is Way Bigger Than You Think" by RealLifeLore.
Once you start looking and asking the right questions you will find so much and it could take you a few years to learn what we know but that is nothing to what we will learn if we keep plugging away at it. There are so many who don't want us looking, learning, an especially going out there to fine out. They want us in boxes. so please take that step and find out for yourself.
Awesome Video! I love your thoughts about what happens after death, Millie. My thought is that if your image is right, then we also ascend spiritually too. Always growing and becoming more like the very angels themselves. Our spirits never die, only evolve.
planet 9 is predicted to be at least 56 billion miles away from us. Look at our clearest picture taken of pluto from the earths surface. and we know where pluto is.
Jupiter's moon Io that they talked about is so hot so far away from the Sun because the gravity of Jupiter and it's other moons distort it (stretching and compressing). Kind of like how molding clay in your hands would warm it up.
Nah!! Its not LO. That moon is called IO(EYE OH). Also there could be n probably is about amillion gazillion solar systems out there and there could literally be billions of life forms out there we will never know because they are just to far away. Nice react tho you two. Love from Indiana Pa U.S.A!!!!
Space telescopes are not useless. Scientists can study what the Universe was like billions of years ago with them. They can also study how stars and galaxy dies using them.
Ok astronomy major here we go The other main problem with venus is you’ll be crushed and toasted instantly Titan a moon of Saturn has a heavy methane atmosphere, because it has the same pressure as earth you don’t need a spacesuit just a warm coat The planet nine theory hasn’t seen any new data that I am aware of, but then again if the sun were the size of a kickball, they’re looking for a pea 17 miles away, it’s difficult to say the least The moon of Jupiter they talk about is called io, not Lo, it’s color is often compared to a moldy pizza Olympus mons, the largest volcano on mars, is about twice the height of Everest. If it were on earth at the top you’d be close to becoming an astronaut. Vallus marinarus was likely formed far earlier in mars history when it had plate tectonics, that would be the site of two plates pulling away, combined with water erosion you get a giant canyon the length of the US
Kinda surprised that the planet with the coldest surface temperature wasn't mentioned. . . . . It's Mercury, right next to the hottest planet. Mercury is gravitationally locked to the sun, thereby causing it to NOT ROTATE so, one side of the planet IS NEVER exposed to the sun.
I think you need to get a grip on how many galaxy's are out there lol millions upon millions of them and the pics that web just sent down show them but the puc is confusing
Fun video but it was grade school level facts. And there was a lot of facts that were misleading. But that's how grade school is as well. You learn the real stuff in College/University. If you want real Science check out Anton Petrov "How Did Earth Stay Habitable For 4 Billion Years? Science: LUCK" or PBS Space Time "The Edge of an Infinite Universe" . This is REAL Science =)
I love your content, and I've been subscribed and watching for quite awhile now, but I'm curious why when the videos are presented in 1080p60 it still looks like 720p and not even 720p60. It's not my system. When other videos are presented this way I do see the clarity difference. But for some reason your videos don't portray it. I'm not a technical guy so I wonder what's happening here. Thanks, guys!
It's possible that their recording at 720p and are simply editing and uploading at 1080p. This would cause such an issue because it's still just a 720p video if that is exactly what the camera originally recorded. Also, the frame rate has nothing to do with the sharpness of the image. That just determines how often the image refreshes. 60fps will have slightly less jitter with fast-moving motion. Since they're just sitting there, this isn't really a noticeable effect. Most movies for example are just shot at 24fps. Even animated TV shows.
@@GalaxyFur Thank you for that. I kinda know what what you mean. But I've seen 4k stuff that looks amazing but when the 60fps comes into play it's like better than reality sometimes. Like I said, I have no clue how it works. I would imagine you'd need a very expensive camera and a computer with componants that could handle it. Also, their video of them in their "studio" seems low rez. So, yeah, recorded at 720p, but how do you upload at a higher quality without it remaining the same as was recorded? I'm confused!
There is software out there that can use AI to bring up the video resolution. But it's far from perfect. It only takes an educated guess and tries to add in pixels by mimicking the actual real pixels that do exist. But it's a far cry from actual native resolution. Also what you are seeing is that not all 4K video cameras are treated the same. A cheap 4K camera will have a smaller image sensor and will not look as good as a high-end 4K camera that has a larger image sensor. A larger image sensor allows for more light and less image artifacting. Also a higher-end 4K camera will have better onboard image processing capabilities for better color accuracy and better lighting compared to a cheap camera. Both cameras will still produce a 4K image typically in the 3840 x 2160 (16:9) format. But a cheap camera will still produce softer lower quality imagery despite it still being a true 4K image if the internal processing isn't all that great on the camera. Also, you can export a 720p image to video editing software. And typically export it at 1080p if you want. Or even at 4K. But your video editing software will only up-res the image with the most basic of AI. So you will get a 1080p video. But it will appear no sharper than a 720p native video.
@@ThePloppy I used to install home theater systems for Circuit City back in the day. And was trained on all of the new TV technologies that were coming out back then. (DLP, Plasma, CRT, Rear Projection, LCD, ETC...) This is because I was working as a TV salesman during the dawn of HDTV and worked through the transition from analog CRT tube TVs, to HDTVs. So I was trained on exactly what screen resolution was and how each new HDTV technology worked. Same with cameras. Plus I have done my own video editing on PC.
It's one of those things even if we discovered another life form on a planet even the closest ones would take a decade to send a message and get a return. As for actually getting there it takes about the energy of a 28 megaton explosion perfectly controlled to get 1kg to near light speed and the same to slow it down and of course you need a ship were people can survive a minimum 5 years. Your talking about deathstar lazer levels of energy. Not to mention you can't see so you can't steer and even a small rock hitting you at that speed would carry nuclear bomb levels of energy.
Not necessarily, it’s theoretically possible to bend the fabric of space so instead of traveling all that distance you could essentially fold space in half life a piece of paper and suddenly distance becomes a minor problem
@@mypud4068 Theoretically possible being the key word. To actually make a stable worm hole requires two places with black hole levels of space time curvature (enter and exit points), exotic matter we have yet to find, string theory to be correct and a absolutely ridiculous amount of energy. Even if we some how fuigered that all out the nearest black hole to us is 5200 light years away and of course worm hole only work in one direction and there is no possible way of telling were the wormhole actually goes.
In another universe I am married to one ex girlfriend and in another I am married to another. I cannot imagine one where I don't like women. Also, the Earth and other planets do not technically orbit the sun, but the gravity pool is created by the sun's mass as it distorts space and it is this distortion we orbit.
I'd agree, i love space and anything to do with it. Swear this video made my eye twitch the whole time (not their video, the video they reacted to). There are many other (short) videos out there that are loads better than this one.
No we don't in my opinion. A lot of stuff "we" "know" about space is just a best guess. Experts don't even know for sure that that portion of what they think they know is right. On earth better scientific approaches can be used giving us a better understanding of stuff and we know more. Additionally since we all live on earth there are billions of people who have an understanding of some aspects of it just as a consequence of everyday life. Add all that collective knowledge to knowledge acquired by those in various businesses, academia, and doing research for other reasons and I would be surprised if the relatively tiny amount of people gaining knowledge about space know more (with much greater constraints on how that knowledge is gained). Some aspects of earth I'm sure have collectively less known about them than some aspects of space, but I doubt more is known about space than the planet as a whole.
This UA-cam channel has some interesting facts, but they also tend to make a LOT of errors and their visualizations can completely misinterpret the "facts". For example, it's Iapetus and Io, not Lapetus and Lo. And the Kuiper belt is not AROUND Neptune, it's BEYOND Neptune, but their visualization showed the former. These are just a few examples of errors in this video.
Word of warning: Take any "facts" you hear from Bright Side with a grain of salt. It's Iapetus (with a capital I) and Io (with a capital I), not "Lapetus" and "Lo" as the announcer says. 🙄
I liked your reaction, but the video you reacted to was pretty bad. It had a lot of misleading facts, wrong scales, used wrong images, and didn't even pronounce Io and Iapetus correctly lol. Click baity science videos are the worst when it comes to actually learning.
Yes, you guys should definitely react to some movies at some point
All jokes aside about Uranus Fun Fact, you can fit 63 earth's inside of Uranus... 64 if you relax a little. Couldn't resist haha
😂
Yea you won comment of the day lol. That’s hilarious 😂.
Great comment. Are you a proctologist? 😂😂😂
@@alanweinman1081I know this is a bit late but I just wanted to clear things up. He's not a proctologist, he's an ass-tronomer.
@@jonathanrenfro7126 That’s very funny!! I laughed at that. Good one by you!
I've heard a few complaints about the $10 billion cost of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). But that was over 10 years, which was $3 per American per year. I'd call that a bargain for what we hope to be revolutionary discoveries.
Quite frankly space is the next frontier and if the U.S keeps cutting nasas budget while other superpowers are spending more on space we are pretty much doomed
@@mypud4068 I was curious how NASA's budget has changed over the years, so I googled it. I found a Wikipedia page titled "Budget of NASA." It has a chart with the totals adjusted to today's dollars. Aside from the '60s, it's surprisingly consistent.
@@JPMadden when we were in the space race it accounted for 5% of the budget and now a days its about a half a percent. The last time they were at even 1% was the early 90s, if you want to get ahead in space R and D that's just a sad number. It should realistically be at about 1%
@@mypud4068 I agree NASA should have a larger budget. That chart I mentioned shows that in the last 30 years, their budget has declined from 1% to 0.5% of the total federal budget, despite the dollar amount declining by only about 10%. This is a reflection of the huge increases in defense, health care, and interest on the national debt since 1990. Years ago, I read an article listing some surprising things that the federal government spends more on than NASA. The one I remember was air conditioning for our military bases in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The moon of Jupiter he mentioned, Io, is pronounced "Eye-O" not "Low".
The cloud storm over Saturn's northern pole is a perfect hexagonal shape. It looks too perfect to be natural but, it is.
Europa, one of Jupiter's moons, is believed to contain a water ocean under its frozen surface containing more than twice the water of Earth and could contain life.
If you were to land on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, or Neptune, you wouldn't be able to "stand" on those planets because there is no solid surface. They're gas planets w a solid core deep at the center.
Surrounding the Solar System is the Oort Cloud which also orbits the Sun, it will take Voyager 1 another 20,000 years to finally exit the Solar System.
My brain melted a little bit when he mispronounced Io, though Bright Side is an astonishingly inaccurate "educational" channel, so I'm not totally surprised.
@@Double0Kevin I had I rather similar feeling, but the exact same thought.
Not to mention calling Iapetus "Lapetus".
Pluto is still a planet as far as I'm concerned
Of all the things I've heard people get upset about, this is among those I understand the least.
That is so funny Millie has not seen Star Wars and her facial expression is priceless! LOL
Also the mars volcano Olympus Mons is about 13.6 miles or 21.9 kilometers so it would make Mt Everest look like an ant
Nearly three times the size
Everest isn't even tallest mountain on Earth.
@@UltraCasualPenguin in terms of the highest peak above sea level it is, from base to peak it’s Mauna Kea but half of it is below sea level
Not a new satellite its from the Webb Telescope, which has imaged galaxies from 13 billion years ago.Astronomy is something every school should teach.
The James Webb telescope is a new satellite. It was launched at the end of December 2021
@@HBC423 it’s a telescope, a satellite has a different function. The Hubble and JW are literally called space telescopes
@@mypud4068 lol it is a telescope, but to be a space telescope it has to be a satellite. A satellite is an object placed into orbit. Satellite doesn't mean a specific purpose, satellites of all kinds are in orbit
One of my favorites in a while. Thanks for setting us up so well for your holiday!
There are more galaxies in the universe than grains of sand on Earth
The size of our own galaxy is pretty much impossible for the human brain to process. Yes, it can be measured with numbers, but these numbers become almost meaningless. And then you realize..... oh there are countless galaxies. The interesting part is realizing that there is so much space that anything you can imagine, it probably exists. But then you go down the rabbit hole wondering what existed before time and matter and you start getting into the freaky/existential stuff.
@10:30 YUP. It's time for her to react to 'How the Universe Is Way Bigger Than You Think!'
Love space videos, I think I've watched every single space video on UA-cam lol
Thanks
Millies right! We never die, just change form!
Millie has it all figured out. LOL!! Of course you will be her pet dog someday. You two are getting married, right? No comment on a lot of this stuff in this video.
That was so awesome! Thanks. I learned a lot.
Ah yes space, my favorite concept, place and thing.
1:50 or what's more scary, is if you end up falling in love with a person in your currently life who in a past life that person caused your death, either accidentally or intentional. this talk kind of reminds me of the Egg Theory that Kurzgesagt made a video about.
The mars info might be wrong. Since the insight lander recorded several earthquakes on mars in the 5.0 range. So mars may have plate tectonics causing these earthquakes.
Love space reactions and yeah yall should def get into movies/TV shows would probably get a lot of views
This was an awesome video. I love this topic. You should definitely react to some movies...
There are a lot of misleading things in the way Bright Side does their videos. In this video they failed to use scale images in some comparisons, provide enough background information, and even got placement wrong. The animated storm on Jupiter was one of them as it was not only much bigger than the Great Red Spot but you could actually see the Great Red Spot to the left of it. Another thing was that they said Neptune was hiding Planet Nine as if it was sitting right behind it. This is not what anyone believes. The Planet Nine theories are based on the odd orbits of several dwarf planets beyond Pluto as well as Neptune's and Pluto's seemingly perturbed orbits. Pluto's elliptical orbit actually comes within the orbit of Neptune at one point (closer to the sun than Neptune). Computer models made to attempt to explain these strange orbits hint at the possible existence of a large planet far out in the Kuiper Belt.
And of course "Lapetus" and "Lo". Videos like this really do a disservice, making people think they know things that are actually way wrong.
@@davidheiser2225 There are some good sources out there that do a good job at trying to explain what "we know" and what "we think" may be going on in the world of science discovery. But it is hard for reactors to always find them without people recommending them. Otherwise all they have to go on is a clickbait title like Brightside uses.
@@socket_error1000 First rule of thumb when it comes to science channels is - avoid anything with a clickbait title.
the moon of Saturn starts with an I, as in Iapetus, who was one of the Titans in Greek Mythology, not Lapetus. The capital I we use really needs to have the top and bottom bars like the Roman numeral 1 does (I can't recreate the roman 1 on my laptop, sorry), because many people get this wrong by accident
And Jupiter's moon Io is called "Lo" in the video. And what's with that red swirly thing they're showing as the Great Red Spot? Videos like this make people stupider.
id love a forrest gump reaction if yall haven't watched
If you ever want to see an amazing nebula check out the witches head nebula and tell me how that happened.
As a science nerd I love videos like this I always learn from them
Please don't! Much of this information is either wrong or misleading. There are much better science channels out there!!
I agree with David. Though some of the information in Bright Side's video is correct, overall the channel excels at creating misleading content. I would recommend other channels.
"I didn't pay much attention to space as a kid." Yeah, it's really out there beyond our daily perception.
It's weird that the video actually shows the Great Red Spot on the left of the image but puts this weird hurricane graphic over the planet. That also isn't a proper scale size for Earth compared to Jupiter.
I studied astronomy in my free time and I know quite a bit. I don't believe he mentioned the Oort Cloud, it is really fascinating. Y'all should research it.
James, did you break Millie's finger? 😂 If there are more advanced entities in the universe (which is a given by the Fermi hypothesi and the Drake equation and absolutely would be certain if they can travel here,) they would see us like we look at ants, and probably pass us by as they would see us as either violent and/or primitive or they would destroy us for the planets resources
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)
Don't remember which planet but I'm pretty sure one of them rains diamonds. Might be Neptune.
Even though the winds on Venus are hefty, if he were to build floating cities (like Cloud City in Star Wars) the winds would be perfectly still because we'd be moving with them.
Did he just call it “Lo?” 🤦♀️
Did that video just call Jupiter's moon Io "low". That's not an L but an i, it's pronounced eye-o
Same with Iapetus, not Lapetus😭
There were some things Bright Side got wrong in this video, but no worries. If you really want to have your minds blown about space, you should check out "How the Universe is Way Bigger Than You Think" by RealLifeLore.
i faintly remember something about Jupiter having two red spots?? Anyone else remember hearing about this??
Great video . Thanks
Once you start looking and asking the right questions you will find so much and it could take you a few years to learn what we know but that is nothing to what we will learn if we keep plugging away at it. There are so many who don't want us looking, learning, an especially going out there to fine out. They want us in boxes. so please take that step and find out for yourself.
Awesome Video! I love your thoughts about what happens after death, Millie. My thought is that if your image is right, then we also ascend spiritually too. Always growing and becoming more like the very angels themselves. Our spirits never die, only evolve.
planet 9 is predicted to be at least 56 billion miles away from us. Look at our clearest picture taken of pluto from the earths surface. and we know where pluto is.
The size of the universe is completely beyond comprehension
the mars volcano is way taller than mount everest, idk what they talking about its around 72k feet compared to 29k feet of everest
The one thing I know about space is that I occupy a lot of it
That was cool!! Who did that video?
I am coming back in my next life as a spoiled house cat. Mine have a great life.
Holy shit "Plan"et 9 in outer space
Jupiter's moon Io that they talked about is so hot so far away from the Sun because the gravity of Jupiter and it's other moons distort it (stretching and compressing). Kind of like how molding clay in your hands would warm it up.
Hi
I can confidently confirm Aliens have better IPhones than us
Nah!! Its not LO. That moon is called IO(EYE OH). Also there could be n probably is about amillion gazillion solar systems out there and there could literally be billions of life forms out there we will never know because they are just to far away. Nice react tho you two. Love from Indiana Pa U.S.A!!!!
If the sun is in the middle of the asteroid belt, does it have a ring? 🤯
The others are waiting for us to improve @
Space telescopes are not useless. Scientists can study what the Universe was like billions of years ago with them. They can also study how stars and galaxy dies using them.
Um, so Millie likes to think that in another life, James was her dad....
Ok astronomy major here we go
The other main problem with venus is you’ll be crushed and toasted instantly
Titan a moon of Saturn has a heavy methane atmosphere, because it has the same pressure as earth you don’t need a spacesuit just a warm coat
The planet nine theory hasn’t seen any new data that I am aware of, but then again if the sun were the size of a kickball, they’re looking for a pea 17 miles away, it’s difficult to say the least
The moon of Jupiter they talk about is called io, not Lo, it’s color is often compared to a moldy pizza
Olympus mons, the largest volcano on mars, is about twice the height of Everest. If it were on earth at the top you’d be close to becoming an astronaut. Vallus marinarus was likely formed far earlier in mars history when it had plate tectonics, that would be the site of two plates pulling away, combined with water erosion you get a giant canyon the length of the US
We are the 5th civilization civilization on this planet. Romans, Inca, Mayan, Egyptians and us. We ARE not alone
Kinda surprised that the planet with the coldest surface temperature wasn't mentioned. . . . . It's Mercury, right next to the hottest planet. Mercury is gravitationally locked to the sun, thereby causing it to NOT ROTATE so, one side of the planet IS NEVER exposed to the sun.
Mercury is in a 2:3 resonance, meaning every 2 rotations, 3 years pass. All sides of the planet eventually get light.
Is it me or did millie just call him daddy?
I think you need to get a grip on how many galaxy's are out there lol millions upon millions of them and the pics that web just sent down show them but the puc is confusing
Ah, the reason Uranus is on it's side is because it is going to have a colonoscopy.
lol
lol
Kepler-185 b 🙃
check out the picture carl sagans little blue dot it will blow your mind away
Fun video but it was grade school level facts. And there was a lot of facts that were misleading. But that's how grade school is as well. You learn the real stuff in College/University. If you want real Science check out Anton Petrov "How Did Earth Stay Habitable For 4 Billion Years? Science: LUCK" or PBS Space Time "The Edge of an Infinite Universe" . This is REAL Science =)
I love your content, and I've been subscribed and watching for quite awhile now, but I'm curious why when the videos are presented in 1080p60 it still looks like 720p and not even 720p60. It's not my system. When other videos are presented this way I do see the clarity difference. But for some reason your videos don't portray it. I'm not a technical guy so I wonder what's happening here. Thanks, guys!
It's possible that their recording at 720p and are simply editing and uploading at 1080p. This would cause such an issue because it's still just a 720p video if that is exactly what the camera originally recorded. Also, the frame rate has nothing to do with the sharpness of the image. That just determines how often the image refreshes. 60fps will have slightly less jitter with fast-moving motion. Since they're just sitting there, this isn't really a noticeable effect. Most movies for example are just shot at 24fps. Even animated TV shows.
@@GalaxyFur Thank you for that. I kinda know what what you mean. But I've seen 4k stuff that looks amazing but when the 60fps comes into play it's like better than reality sometimes. Like I said, I have no clue how it works. I would imagine you'd need a very expensive camera and a computer with componants that could handle it. Also, their video of them in their "studio" seems low rez. So, yeah, recorded at 720p, but how do you upload at a higher quality without it remaining the same as was recorded? I'm confused!
There is software out there that can use AI to bring up the video resolution. But it's far from perfect. It only takes an educated guess and tries to add in pixels by mimicking the actual real pixels that do exist. But it's a far cry from actual native resolution.
Also what you are seeing is that not all 4K video cameras are treated the same. A cheap 4K camera will have a smaller image sensor and will not look as good as a high-end 4K camera that has a larger image sensor.
A larger image sensor allows for more light and less image artifacting. Also a higher-end 4K camera will have better onboard image processing capabilities for better color accuracy and better lighting compared to a cheap camera.
Both cameras will still produce a 4K image typically in the 3840 x 2160 (16:9) format. But a cheap camera will still produce softer lower quality imagery despite it still being a true 4K image if the internal processing isn't all that great on the camera.
Also, you can export a 720p image to video editing software. And typically export it at 1080p if you want. Or even at 4K. But your video editing software will only up-res the image with the most basic of AI. So you will get a 1080p video. But it will appear no sharper than a 720p native video.
@@GalaxyFur Wow, you know you're stuff. Do you work with this kind of thing for a living? Thanks for the info.
@@ThePloppy I used to install home theater systems for Circuit City back in the day. And was trained on all of the new TV technologies that were coming out back then. (DLP, Plasma, CRT, Rear Projection, LCD, ETC...)
This is because I was working as a TV salesman during the dawn of HDTV and worked through the transition from analog CRT tube TVs, to HDTVs.
So I was trained on exactly what screen resolution was and how each new HDTV technology worked. Same with cameras.
Plus I have done my own video editing on PC.
So the reason why we cry when we are born is because we remember our past lives and the older we get the more we forget about our past lives.
Except for deja vu
@@Donny_Mise exactly that too
It's one of those things even if we discovered another life form on a planet even the closest ones would take a decade to send a message and get a return. As for actually getting there it takes about the energy of a 28 megaton explosion perfectly controlled to get 1kg to near light speed and the same to slow it down and of course you need a ship were people can survive a minimum 5 years. Your talking about deathstar lazer levels of energy. Not to mention you can't see so you can't steer and even a small rock hitting you at that speed would carry nuclear bomb levels of energy.
Not necessarily, it’s theoretically possible to bend the fabric of space so instead of traveling all that distance you could essentially fold space in half life a piece of paper and suddenly distance becomes a minor problem
@@mypud4068 Theoretically possible being the key word. To actually make a stable worm hole requires two places with black hole levels of space time curvature (enter and exit points), exotic matter we have yet to find, string theory to be correct and a absolutely ridiculous amount of energy. Even if we some how fuigered that all out the nearest black hole to us is 5200 light years away and of course worm hole only work in one direction and there is no possible way of telling were the wormhole actually goes.
In another universe I am married to one ex girlfriend and in another I am married to another. I cannot imagine one where I don't like women. Also, the Earth and other planets do not technically orbit the sun, but the gravity pool is created by the sun's mass as it distorts space and it is this distortion we orbit.
5:03 Teaches 3 year olds, or IS a three year old?
How about a Millie from Mars. Did James bit you finger after all you are sweet. James behave !!!☺🌷
A lot of these “interesting facts” are either outright wrong, or so oversimplified that they might as well be.
I'd agree, i love space and anything to do with it. Swear this video made my eye twitch the whole time (not their video, the video they reacted to). There are many other (short) videos out there that are loads better than this one.
Not in textbooks...so, these are "fun/(made up) facts"? 😂
Kinda ridiculous how we know more about the cosmos than we do our own planet
False
@@passingthroughtime3033 Not really. In regards to the oceans, we know more about space than them.
No we don't in my opinion. A lot of stuff "we" "know" about space is just a best guess. Experts don't even know for sure that that portion of what they think they know is right. On earth better scientific approaches can be used giving us a better understanding of stuff and we know more.
Additionally since we all live on earth there are billions of people who have an understanding of some aspects of it just as a consequence of everyday life. Add all that collective knowledge to knowledge acquired by those in various businesses, academia, and doing research for other reasons and I would be surprised if the relatively tiny amount of people gaining knowledge about space know more (with much greater constraints on how that knowledge is gained).
Some aspects of earth I'm sure have collectively less known about them than some aspects of space, but I doubt more is known about space than the planet as a whole.
This UA-cam channel has some interesting facts, but they also tend to make a LOT of errors and their visualizations can completely misinterpret the "facts". For example, it's Iapetus and Io, not Lapetus and Lo. And the Kuiper belt is not AROUND Neptune, it's BEYOND Neptune, but their visualization showed the former. These are just a few examples of errors in this video.
Also when they're talking about Uranus being tilted on its side, they show Neptune instead
@@mallomon They also placed the Great Red Spot to the right of the Great Red Spot even though it was visible in the image 🤦♂
Word of warning: Take any "facts" you hear from Bright Side with a grain of salt.
It's Iapetus (with a capital I) and Io (with a capital I), not "Lapetus" and "Lo" as the announcer says.
🙄
Forget space give the money back to the taxpayers !!
Forget space give the money back to the poor taxpayers !!
Jupiter's moon Lo?
Maybe he should stop making facts videos until he gets his facts correct.
I liked your reaction, but the video you reacted to was pretty bad. It had a lot of misleading facts, wrong scales, used wrong images, and didn't even pronounce Io and Iapetus correctly lol.
Click baity science videos are the worst when it comes to actually learning.