Everything You Need To Know About Russia's Newest Stealth Fighter

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 195

  • @EvolvedTactical
    @EvolvedTactical 3 роки тому +32

    If I've learned anything, Doom has taught me not to trust a company named UAC.
    *loads shotgun with malicious intent*

  • @TheZoePath
    @TheZoePath 3 роки тому +52

    The Russian's really meant to name it "Send us the check, mate!" For this plane to have enough fuel to match it's proposed range, then there's clearly no space for weapons on this chassis. I'm calling BS on this on!

    • @tentimesful
      @tentimesful 2 роки тому +1

      so true 3 missiles for its bay....

    • @BungieStudios
      @BungieStudios Рік тому +1

      They’re like Hammer vs Stark. A giant GoFundMe. Russia makes the model and seeks buyers to fund its production. No money, no resources, and corruption mean few to no production models.

    • @BungieStudios
      @BungieStudios Рік тому +1

      I’ve met many brilliant Russians in tech. I have no doubt their country can make incredible things, but their internal politics and foreign relations will never allow it to happen. Probably why individuals end up emigrating West instead.

  • @adozer6848
    @adozer6848 3 роки тому +15

    Great video! I hope your channel grows exponentially.

  • @skip123davis
    @skip123davis 3 роки тому +36

    great report - best i've seen so far - including the war zone. i've been really curious about this plane. i've seen a few other vids that call this a "prototype," and it's nothing of the sort. it's a full scale model, subject to change at that.
    my understanding is that it will use su-57 engines to start, but that a purpose designed new engine is being developed. also: that it has supercruise. any thoughts on any of that?

    • @skip123davis
      @skip123davis 3 роки тому +6

      @@koekiejam18 you maybe right: i might have it backwards. this from thewarzone:
      The planned powerplant is not confirmed, but it is described as an engine in the 14.5 to 16-ton thrust class engine, utilizing off-the-shelf components. This rating would put it at the upper end of the output of the AL-41F1 turbofan now used in the Su-57, or at the lower end of the all-new Izdeliye 30, which is currently still in development.

    • @SandboxxApp
      @SandboxxApp  3 роки тому +5

      🇺🇲Thanks for watching!

  • @brrrtnerd2450
    @brrrtnerd2450 3 роки тому +48

    Gonna go out on a limb here. Russia has a pretty hefty history of novel aircraft design. They led the way in IR technology, and the Mig 29 was the epitome of a short range high speed, maneuverable interceptor. They also pioneered off bore site targeting with the IR system. Sure the SU-57 is a near miss, but lets say they get the cost wrong and come in at 80 million on the Checkmate, it will still be a bargain. If the Checkmate, becomes a reincarnation of the Mig 29 in that it is robust, cost effective, small, and Russia gets the radar absorbent coating right, along with the engines, it could really be a game changer for a lot of non NATO countries. I know it is paper, but Russian Aeronautical engineers are a pretty savvy bunch, and I think that this little guy, with even 70% of the deliverables put in the package, could shock everyone . . . or it could be another dud. I think the magic might happen here though. Time will tell.

    • @aidan11162
      @aidan11162 3 роки тому +12

      1990s Brain drain effects are still being felt. Team that with the economic woes and I’d be surprised if they get it into service in any appreciable numbers

    • @unprofessionalmechanic8466
      @unprofessionalmechanic8466 3 роки тому +3

      Not russia. Soviet union = gulag of 15 republics. Russia is #1 terrorist, peaceful neighbor invading fascist.
      Before we discuss plywood live-sized model, what is up with with su57 promised to hit production in what? 2013-ish?
      No declared avionics, no declared weapons... a 4-5 su57 that are flying are doing so with previous, soviet designed and sonewhat updated (so they stopped using semiconductor lamps) avionics and old engines...

    • @randybentley2633
      @randybentley2633 3 роки тому +1

      One thing to consider is the way they have the empennage set up that short of a multi-vector engine nozzle the maneuverability of this design may suffer given that the F-23 also was ever so slightly deficient in that department with its similar design. Conversely though the 23 was also more stealthy...

    • @EEEEEEE354
      @EEEEEEE354 3 роки тому +3

      I agree with you, but the MiG-29 specifically was kind of a flop.

    • @BSUPERSABRE
      @BSUPERSABRE 3 роки тому +2

      You know F-4s and F-106s had IRST and a helmet sight before the soviet union did? But with radar getting better and better they decided IRST was not necessary. Whereas the soviets needed IRST to supplement lack luster radar

  • @jaysonpida5379
    @jaysonpida5379 3 роки тому +9

    His last statements are really the heart of the matter for this 'new' jet --a way to fund the 57 by selling 'lesser' air forces a stealth F-16.

    • @blegi1245
      @blegi1245 3 роки тому

      LTS uses mostly Su-57 systems. The development money is already spent (exept for the engine that is still under development). Now russia might use the export revenue to subsidize Su-57 production costs to the russian air force. That is very much possible.

    • @jameson1239
      @jameson1239 3 роки тому

      I’d say probably a 5th gen Mig-29 or Mig-21

  • @calags
    @calags 3 роки тому +7

    Say what you will about the Russians they always seem to have interesting aerodynamic ideas. That "smiling" chin intake seems to blend ventral, side by side and DSI features.

    • @jimmyskaltsas9239
      @jimmyskaltsas9239 3 роки тому +1

      An idea that Americans had already come up with, have a look at the boeing x32

    • @calags
      @calags 3 роки тому

      @@jimmyskaltsas9239 It's similar, of course, but I don't think the X-32's inlet extended to form jagged strakes on both sides. The X-32 extended to the strakes but did not form a jagged intersection. I suspect both would form vortices at certain angles of attack but I wonder if there's an advantage to the Checkmate's approach.

    • @_Coffee4Closers
      @_Coffee4Closers 3 роки тому +2

      Yes it will be a nightmare for the rough runways Russia claims it will be operating from... as it just like the X32 will be sucking up FOD. It will be eating everything from pebbles to squirrels.

  • @ritterkreutztrager
    @ritterkreutztrager 2 роки тому

    Thank you for covering this. I felt it was appropriate for the current state of "competitive" affairs. K H

  • @sfoeric
    @sfoeric 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks!

  • @joannawie
    @joannawie 3 роки тому

    Well done. Thx.

  • @gruzza9000
    @gruzza9000 3 роки тому +3

    hey there , great vid, would like to be around when it finally flies

    • @Dana-cb7vk
      @Dana-cb7vk 3 роки тому +2

      Oh it doesn't even fly yet? 🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂

  • @SephirothRyu
    @SephirothRyu 2 роки тому +2

    You ought to do a video on some of the latest air-to-air missiles sometime.

  • @Youllpayforthat
    @Youllpayforthat 3 роки тому +4

    am i the only one who thinks this looks somewhat like the F 35? ig its just the basic design of it kinda looks similar but after seeing some more pictures eh, ive seen some other people saying it looks like Lockheeds 6th gen design they showed off recently but i never saw that. i just think its a bit interesting lol

  • @MrTweaksTV
    @MrTweaksTV 3 роки тому +6

    it looks exactly like the "adversary" aircraft , sporadically depicted in last year's Lockheed Martin 6th gen add. that's actually amazing

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 3 роки тому

      convergent evolution is a hell of a drug

  • @ImOnGearSoWhat
    @ImOnGearSoWhat 3 роки тому +11

    It’s literally a copy of a *Boeing X-32.*

    • @hanfei6871
      @hanfei6871 3 роки тому +2

      ah yes everything that flies is a copy of US archetypes

    • @FP194
      @FP194 3 роки тому +2

      @@hanfei6871
      Ah yes you are just to blind to see it

  • @richal4596
    @richal4596 3 роки тому +3

    We don't know what we don't know.

  • @tobiwan001
    @tobiwan001 3 роки тому +4

    The F-35C has a maximum structural load of 7.5G btw. And Lockheed greatly exaggerates performance while - as you stated - makes lower claims regarding price. For export markets the alleged price for the F-35A was greater than 100million (most recent sale to Switzerland for example). Switzerland got a lot of claims regarding low maintenance costs that I would consider unbelievable. In conclusion: Russia might make bold claims but there are many companies that massage the numbers.

  • @chunkblaster
    @chunkblaster 3 роки тому +5

    See personally I feel like this is the route we should have taken wrather than buying more F-15's, dont get me wrong the EX looks very promising but, at the end of the day it still isn't stealth. And for all it's payload and maneuverability, that amounts to basically nothing if it can't detect it's target

    • @EEEEEEE354
      @EEEEEEE354 3 роки тому +3

      The F-15EX was most likely bought not because of capability, but because Boeing needed a "bailout" of sorts. The F-15EX has been proposed a number of times in the 2000s in different forms. The Silent eagle, the F-15 2040c, etc. The USAF rejected it before, so why would they suddenly accept it now? It's not even particularly cheap to buy or operate. Their are a lot of Boeing lobbyists, and the Lockheed has something like 60% of military contracts. F-15EX was most likely to help Boeing.

    • @isodoublet
      @isodoublet 2 роки тому +1

      Have you noticed how the messaging on stealth changed over the years? In the 90s they would literally say stealth was "invisible" to radar (they of course knew better, but that was the messaging). Then the understanding of reduced RCS and reduced detection range sort of trickled down, but stealth fighters were still seen as the future. Then there was the JSF program, meant to replace basically all fighters used by all branches of the armed forces with a one-size-fits-all design (a strategy that has never failed to fail, but I digress). After the F-35 failed to deliver on what it promised, the branches started buying other planes like the F-15EX, saying that stealth fighters are like the "Ferrari" and that other conventionally observable fighters will remain the workhorse. I think what's happening is clear: they're voting with their feet as the purported benefits of stealth technology didn't materialize as expected. Either because it's too expensive (and costs never came down) or because development in networking and signal analysis makes it so that effective countermeasures are much easier to design today than they were in the days of the F-117.

    • @BungieStudios
      @BungieStudios Рік тому

      The F-15EX wouldn’t be working alone. It can also serve as a missile boat for stealth aircraft that push ahead.

  • @Jojooooooo
    @Jojooooooo 3 роки тому +4

    looks suspiciously like the x32

  • @docwhiskey996
    @docwhiskey996 3 роки тому +2

    You know what does fly? F-22s.

  • @ClassicStreetIron
    @ClassicStreetIron 3 роки тому +8

    By the time they get their 5th gen fighter in the air the US will be testing the first 7th gen fighter.

    • @bh8671
      @bh8671 3 роки тому +2

      And America will still be behind. So one day they may catch up. Just because America wastes money and is dumb enough to keep doing it. Doesn’t mean it’s better.

    • @ricardomontoya2395
      @ricardomontoya2395 3 роки тому +6

      @@bh8671 thats why china and russia are copying americas hw, remember you may get the same grade from copying someones test, but you cant get a better score

    • @FP194
      @FP194 3 роки тому

      @@bh8671
      Blah blah blah blah

    • @quinndenver4075
      @quinndenver4075 3 роки тому

      @@bh8671 that’s not how that works

  • @quakethedoombringer
    @quakethedoombringer 3 роки тому +10

    I feel like this project will get nowhere. 30 million dollars sounds way too good of a price for a jet with stealth technology, hypersonic missile and other gimmicks (it is barely more expensive than 4th gen, single engine aircrafts from the 80s like the F 16 or the Gripen).
    I won't be surprised if the plane will be watered down significantly in terms of features while the price keeps ballooning that most customers would rather buy older 4th gen or wait until other 5th gen become affordable

    • @Biden_is_demented
      @Biden_is_demented 3 роки тому +1

      You are forgetting the differences in cost of living between both countries. The military aerospace industry is usually a national endeavour, with very little parts coming from abroad. So what happens is that you pay (or overpay) for things just to keep the industry homegrown. The cost of living in the US is several times higher than Russia, and on top of that you have the cost of lobbying. What this boils down to, is that both aircraft might even be very similar in quality of parts used and design efficiency, but americans simply pay more for it. The differences in price do not forcefully mean a difference in quality. And you should know by now that russian engineers are top notch, as was proven by the space race. With enough funding, i think they would surpass the US. A very good proof of concept is the russian Buran Energia space shuttle, which was vastly superior to the american one. And they did it with a fraction of the budget. People need to start leaving national pride out of the equation, and start objectively judging things for what they are, not what you want them to be. It might sting a little, to some.

    • @benghazi4216
      @benghazi4216 3 роки тому

      I think you need to update yourself on the Gripen. Just because the name is kept doesn't mean it's old like the F-16's.
      A better fit would be the Super Hornet, which is actually also a new aircraft and not just an upgraded version.
      But that comparison would be a miss match when it comes to capabilities.
      I can't wait to see many Norwegian F35's the Gripen E will be able dispatch in the upcoming exercises, as the F16's were a turkey shoot for the old C version.
      But yes, the price for the Russian fighter is pure fantasy for the capabilities proposed.

  • @leeofallon
    @leeofallon 2 роки тому +1

    The Russians never fail to perplex: in the middle of a failing air and naval war, an economy on the brink, and a population in full revolt, they are presenting a next generation stealth fighter that struggles to pull high G’s but has good range to outrun the pursuer. The question is, no matter how cheap, who would purchase it?

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 Рік тому

      Looks tiny. Love the looks of it quite honestly.
      It's all talk. Even if they had the know how to make it they don't have the capability to produce the electronics and other bell and whistles. Especially now as I'm writing in 2023.
      Sorry Russia your boasting doesn't work anymore. The US military thanks you for scaring politicians and citizens into thinking your weapons are the end all be all so they get more funding for projects to counter it.

  • @trumanhw
    @trumanhw 3 роки тому +3

    So, BIGGGER radius, lower weight, higher capacity AND lower drag coefficient...? Suuure.
    Why make the TRADE-OFFS PHYSICS REQUIRES -- when we want both?
    The laws of physics will just give Russian engineers a "ticket for their transgressions."
    (Good news for the F-35 / F-22 ... the laws of physics aren't subject to repeal).

    • @alexflim
      @alexflim 3 роки тому +1

      F-35 was made fat on purpose (to accommodate VTOL ventilator) so it has bad drag coeff. its not problem to made a plane that gonna be better than f-35 flight characteristic vise. And F-22 well its a 30 y old plane? composits and engines came long way since then

  • @adg1017
    @adg1017 2 роки тому

    👍 Check out CW Lemoine’s review on this as well. Good stuff.

  • @ORLY911
    @ORLY911 3 роки тому +3

    I feel like the old Sukhois and Mig 29's are still the best they have, we saw how much the F-35 compromised for it's multirole platform here I can't imagine the amount of gimping this thing is going to take for it's cheap cost.

  • @belldrop7365
    @belldrop7365 3 роки тому +2

    Take a photo of it and slap F35 on the photo. Wonder how many people can tell the difference.

  • @RayW808
    @RayW808 3 роки тому +2

    Crowd funded Vaporware, looks cool but so did the SU-57 and T-14 Armata.

  • @eveningstarnm3107
    @eveningstarnm3107 2 роки тому +1

    Four will be the maximum number they will ever be able to build, and those jets will make interesting museum pieces when Russia is forced to convert back to a horse-and-buggy economy (although in Russia's case, it will be mule-and-cart). If they ever build more, it will be our fault.

  • @seanwhittington6637
    @seanwhittington6637 3 роки тому +5

    How can Russia build a real stealth plane with black smoke pouring out the tail pipes 😂

  • @Rjsjrjsjrjsj
    @Rjsjrjsjrjsj 2 роки тому +2

    Russia claims. 🙄
    Watch this. I built a stealth fighter in my backyard out of scrap metal, wood and duct tape that can supercruise at mach 10. Has a range of 10,000 miles. Fires megawatt lasers at any angle and is LITERALLY invisible to ANY detection system.
    See? Claims are easy. It's just talk. Or typing. Stay tuned for my next creation. A death star, carrier, black hole creating super machine. I'm thinking grass clippings and old cardboard. 👍

  • @WasabiSniffer
    @WasabiSniffer 2 роки тому

    from other commentaries, it sounds like a lot of the proposed equipment is about a decade behind the F35

  • @AB-vc7ox
    @AB-vc7ox 2 роки тому +1

    Reminds me of the Iranian “Stealth” Fighter

  • @TheBlueMeanie
    @TheBlueMeanie 3 роки тому

    Great chan, subbed

  • @armoredsaint6639
    @armoredsaint6639 3 роки тому +6

    More Russian hardware soon to be burning on the desert floor!

  • @HailAzathoth
    @HailAzathoth 3 роки тому +1

    Ah yes, 5th gen fighter that miiiight enter production after the US 6th gen fighter. Nice.

  • @iVETAnsolini
    @iVETAnsolini 3 роки тому +1

    At least this plane comes with LEDS 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Endakol
    @Endakol 3 роки тому +3

    Nothing new here mostly hype and research...respect though

  • @big.atom37
    @big.atom37 3 роки тому +1

    You made mistakes. It was claimed that the jet can carry 3 RVV-SDs (R-77M, medium-range) and 2 RVV-MD (R-73M, short-range) in 3 internal weapon bays, not RVV-BD (R-37, long-range). All of these missiles are not hypersonic. What they meant is either R-37M (in testing stage) or a new hypersonic air-to-ground missile that is currently being developed for Su-57. But the fighter will be able to carry only 2 of either of those in its biggest weapon bay.

  • @Semendrija123
    @Semendrija123 Рік тому

    Just a few remarks!
    Development of the Checkmate is done solely by the Sukhoi, it is not a state program and its serial production has nothing to do with the Russian economy, which is very stable by the way (don't buy the western hype and propaganda). Also, as we speak, the new batches of operational Su-57 planes are entering units, and its production will increase with every passing year, and that is the fact.
    Sukhoi made a smart move with the Su-75 Checkmate because the export market is in the need of relatively cheep and modern stealth fighter plane, and they can be extremely competitive regarding the price/performance ratio for one very simple reason, and that is the homology between it and the Su-57!
    The Su-75 shares the cockpit/canopy, wings, vertical tails, main weapons bay, engine, on board electronics and weapons with the Su-57, which means that there is no need for additional funding for majority of the parts because they are already tested and proven.
    Also, the Su-75 won't have "some" degree of sensor fusion like you have stated, it will have the full sensor fusion suite, far superior to F-22 for example, and on similar level with the F-35. According to the official statements from the Sukhoi, even the early Su-57 prototypes had few times superior computing power of its main central computer called IMA BK (in early stages of development the computer had software volume composed of billions lines of code, (between 4-8 billions, which is much more than the F-22's 1,7 billion), and computing power of some 300 GFLOPS, compared to 20 GFLOPS of the F-22).
    Second thing, the notion that the plane has "only" 8G limit by itself absolutely doesn't mean that the plane is less maneuverable than other planes that can pull the 9G's.
    The 8G limit is the structural limit, not aerodynamic limit (they probably didn't want to increase the weight and cost of the plane by addition structural strengthening), and the plane pulling the 8G's at lower speed can have better turn rate and smaller turn radius than the plane pulling 9G's at higher speed!
    In other words, If the plane has better lift to drag ratio and SEP (specific exes power) in the area below the 9G compared to the other plane that can pull 9G, and if it has better nose pointing capability (high AoA controlability, or post stall capability), than such a plane will have advantage 99 percent of the time!
    To put it even more simply, even the old Mig-21 can pull 8,5G's, but does that mean that the plane is more maneuverable and agile than Su-75?
    The answer is definitely no, especially if we keep in mind that the plane will have inherited maneuverability of the Su-57 (it will use the number components of the bigger brother including TVC engines).
    Third, since the plane has the same main weapons bay as the Su-57, it will be able to store every type of weapon Su-57 can use, including the hypersonic version of the R-37M.
    The RVV-BD is the export version of the R-37M missile with the limited range of 200 km, but the R-37M for the Russian military has the range between 300-400 km, and the missile was able to make a world record kill in Ukraine of 217 km! The AIM-120D can't come close to this missile regarding range, speed, active seeker power, and warhead power!
    Other than that, you made pretty dissent video!

  • @GuyX2013
    @GuyX2013 3 роки тому +1

    The checkers "The Checkmate" 😆🤣

  • @thegrinch8161
    @thegrinch8161 2 роки тому

    The Bear doesn't do anything without a great reason behind it

  • @milutinke
    @milutinke 3 роки тому

    The plane is not funded or ordered by the Russian government, it's independend project of Sukhoi, and apparently it already has some foreign investors.
    They will utilize technologies from Su-57, so it's going to be cheaper to develop and produce.

  • @chunkblaster
    @chunkblaster 3 роки тому

    AI in the cockpit? The movie Stealth is becoming more and more prophetic

  • @thegrinch8161
    @thegrinch8161 2 роки тому

    Oh aye the f35 millstone, a great aircraft my arse and mustard

  • @jmrrrdann3369
    @jmrrrdann3369 3 роки тому +10

    It’s literally a poverty style f35 lol..

  • @gspotmop8242
    @gspotmop8242 3 роки тому +1

    Amen👍🙂

  • @randybentley2633
    @randybentley2633 3 роки тому

    Am I the only one who was disappointed that when this plane was revealed that it wasn't Firefox...?

  • @drush525
    @drush525 3 роки тому

    Russian story telling is world renowned.

  • @timothybryan8260
    @timothybryan8260 3 роки тому

    Hate to say it but Russia makes some good stuff.

  • @joannawie
    @joannawie 3 роки тому +1

    Their Su-57 isn't still a 5th gen fighter.

  • @unprofessionalmechanic8466
    @unprofessionalmechanic8466 3 роки тому +1

    Yeah, this thing is made out of plywood, su57 promised to hit production in 2013, is still not being made. All you need to know.
    Oh and MC21 a mid size passenger jet- they uncapable of making even that, because terrorussia does not have technology to produce materials for its wings and fuselage.
    Oh and light military cargo plane - they cant make that either - comes out few metric ton heavier than needed no matter what they do.
    They cant make clothes iron, microwave, TV, CPU, car, smartphone, vacuum cleaner, underwear, socks, space rocket (last remaining astrunaut was recently laid-off) , can't build space rocket launching pad, can't build aircarrier nor fix existing one, among many other things.
    What peaceful neighbor invading fascist russia can make: Kalashnikov, Novichek.
    Oh, scratch off Kalashnikov - that was German, soviets actuall had to bring in capturet in WW2 German engineers to finish it off.

  • @behxad10
    @behxad10 3 роки тому +2

    Now doubt it will be first choice of Pakistan Air Force...

  • @WifeMadeThaStew
    @WifeMadeThaStew 2 роки тому +2

    Here’s all you need to know about it….they’ll only make 6 of them

    • @sim-sam
      @sim-sam 2 роки тому

      ...then let 4 of them rot, stitch togheter the resting 2 out of the pieces of the other 4 and some tanks, and let them fly every 9th of may to show the world on how powerful they are and spread fear to anyone speaking the opposite with some blue or yellow color (they will be banned forever... and 1 day).

  • @ogdocvato
    @ogdocvato 3 роки тому

    Planform reminds me of Boeing X-32.

  • @HolmesCory
    @HolmesCory 3 роки тому +1

    Union Aerospace Corporation up to dodgy tactics? The hell you say!!! 😁

  • @Itisinthehand
    @Itisinthehand 2 роки тому

    Pie in the sky.

  • @marianpazdzioch6632
    @marianpazdzioch6632 3 роки тому

    Russia has no problem developing modern military tanks or planes. Problem starts when russian goverment is asked "how many will you actually buy ?".

  • @RayWright-gq5bp
    @RayWright-gq5bp Рік тому +1

    MR. HUNTER, I'LL BE IN WASHINGTON DC, TOO SEE SITE'S HISTORY OF AMERICA 🇺🇸 ETC

  • @mccari09
    @mccari09 3 роки тому

    I’m waiting for 🇬🇧 tempest

  • @Homoprimatesapiens
    @Homoprimatesapiens 3 роки тому

    Pls show us how it performes at an arial display.

  • @accutronitisthe2nd95
    @accutronitisthe2nd95 3 роки тому

    Checkmate? more like Reality Check!

  • @trumanhw
    @trumanhw 3 роки тому +1

    HOLY SHIT! ITS GOT THE X-32 GOBLIN CHIN ... the OBVIOUS LOSER that competed with the F-35!! lol

  • @matthewdavies2057
    @matthewdavies2057 2 роки тому

    So, F16XLski. Bet China wants to rent one badly.

  • @vincentaxm8322
    @vincentaxm8322 3 роки тому +1

    Ironically judging from its look and configuration, it could have a much better stealth capability than the su57. Cuz su57 isn't a stealth fighter at all lol, just look at the engine air intake. It is completely straight without any S duct configuration

    • @Enkarashaddam
      @Enkarashaddam Рік тому

      I don't even think it has divertless intakes

  • @teddy.d174
    @teddy.d174 3 роки тому +2

    $30million? 🤣🤣🤣 yeah ok.

  • @BungieStudios
    @BungieStudios Рік тому

    AI is easy to implement. Look at Comma AI. Teaching it is hard. You need data. A lot of data. Like Number 5, “NEED INPUT!” No data or bad data means worthless software.

  • @jimmyboomsemtex9735
    @jimmyboomsemtex9735 3 роки тому

    i wish it was a mig tho but its a cool jet

  • @albertvanderheiden7419
    @albertvanderheiden7419 3 роки тому +2

    Pfff what a hype. Lets call it the battle off the mock up fighters.

  • @gruzza9000
    @gruzza9000 3 роки тому +3

    and for all of you that say it is not a stealth plane , if india or china get involved , then this plane could become superior to most other fighters of its specific platform, it is merely a marketing design , features can be change

    • @jaysonpida5379
      @jaysonpida5379 3 роки тому +3

      India and china won't touch it. India had a large contract with russia for the Su-57 and then cancelled it entirely stating that it there were 'problems'. And why would china give all that money to russia when they can steal plans & build their own platforms just as well......

    • @gruzza9000
      @gruzza9000 3 роки тому

      @@jaysonpida5379 wy invest 40 billion in a new project , wwhen u can pay a tiny fraction of that for a top of the tech line cheap fighter

  • @samzx81
    @samzx81 3 роки тому

    I wonder how long it will be before they build the mars base.

    • @samzx81
      @samzx81 3 роки тому

      Or rather the mars moon bases LOL.

  • @ZephrusPrime
    @ZephrusPrime 3 роки тому +1

    So it's just a concept...

  • @duster0669
    @duster0669 3 роки тому

    Yup! They might make 2...in a decade.

  • @EverettB74
    @EverettB74 3 роки тому

    The only one they can afford to build.

  • @justcallmedylan2714
    @justcallmedylan2714 3 роки тому +1

    real question is, can it beat f-22?

    • @TheGManWA
      @TheGManWA 3 роки тому +8

      Seriously?🤣🤣🤣

    • @katimboallan4605
      @katimboallan4605 3 роки тому +2

      Yes. By the time it becomes operational, it will be more advanced than any 5 gen aircraft. Because technology evolves each year.

    • @blisteringstars
      @blisteringstars 3 роки тому +5

      @@katimboallan4605 1 engine aircraft against the stealthiest most maneuverable 2 engine thrust vectoring aircraft?

    • @Dana-cb7vk
      @Dana-cb7vk 3 роки тому +3

      It doesnt even fly yet?!?😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂
      By the time it does, sure- but what will be fielded on the opposing side that is top tier by then?

  • @jero4059
    @jero4059 3 роки тому

    Military's whole purpose is to lower mental "load" ;)

  • @esathegreat
    @esathegreat 3 роки тому +1

    The car pulling the jet is german

  • @johnrhoades6214
    @johnrhoades6214 3 роки тому

    Did anyone say yf-23 is this damn sure what it looks like one lost of the F-22 Raptor this jet looks almost identical to the one the lost the contract

  • @_Coffee4Closers
    @_Coffee4Closers 3 роки тому

    I think you mean "plans for a new fighter".... there is no fighter, there is a cardboard and plastic model of something.

  • @happyundertaker6255
    @happyundertaker6255 3 роки тому

    So by 1:06 we know everything we can know.

  • @usaball219
    @usaball219 3 роки тому +1

    ZOOOM

  • @bones3002
    @bones3002 3 роки тому

    So, we’re racing to the bottom on military planes?

  • @barrykennedy9947
    @barrykennedy9947 3 роки тому

    This is the newest, did they actually have an oldest.

  • @nicholasharitonidis8170
    @nicholasharitonidis8170 3 роки тому

    I love how from the start its Russia never finish's this or that yet somehow its the only country that every american seems to be afraid of. Perhaps there is a reason for that which your context lacks or you neglect to share

    • @georgekingiv8171
      @georgekingiv8171 3 роки тому +1

      Reason is nuclear weapons not Russian fighters.

  • @mangofett927
    @mangofett927 3 роки тому +1

    It looks like a 35. It's essentially an F-35 "lite" being made for a fraction of the cost. That being said, this channel seems to have a clear bias in favor of the 35, hence why this video is kind of salty. If every other video here wasn't a spunk-fest over that expensive wet fart of an aircraft, I'd be more inclined to place stock in your points here. The SU-30 from Russia would likely give the F-35 a lot of trouble in a fight. I have yet to see this channel shit on Chinese planes like it does on Russian ones. Maybe that's because the Chinese fighters are based off of stolen blueprints from the US.

  • @conce723
    @conce723 Рік тому

    Having seen the great display of Russia's military display in Ukraine, I am going to call B.S. on most if not all of Russia's claims about this fighter jet. I think that they are exaggerating and embellishing the jet's capabilities. In lamest terms, I think they are lying.

  • @Nitrous-ej5zy
    @Nitrous-ej5zy 3 роки тому

    Looks like a Boeing X32 and a Euro fighter had a bastard drunk son....smh...

  • @adamfrazer5150
    @adamfrazer5150 2 роки тому

    "Bargain basement stealth" ?! 😲
    Vladimir disagrees strongly with your assessment ! 😠
    He NEVER said anything about a bargain ! 😐

  • @TheGManWA
    @TheGManWA 3 роки тому +5

    It just reeks of desperation and sale on speculation!

  • @f1reguy587
    @f1reguy587 3 роки тому +1

    Well, America should buy a few, help Russia grow, money to them is help to them rather than everyone funding China in multiple ways… looking at the craft it’s pretty much an F16 though, but not being a radar engineer, it looks l8ke it’s not stealth at all, unless the paint is absolutly amazing.

  • @randyb5067
    @randyb5067 3 роки тому

    Lmao.. We really think they're showing us the good sh!t

  • @_Coffee4Closers
    @_Coffee4Closers 3 роки тому

    If stealth is dead like Russia (falsely) keeps claiming, then why are they working so had to develop one that works?

    • @jamesharris9816
      @jamesharris9816 2 роки тому

      They aren't. This aircraft is for their client states so they don't lose them to the competitor.

    • @_Coffee4Closers
      @_Coffee4Closers 2 роки тому

      @@jamesharris9816 LOL... where did you get this silly and WRONG idea from. The SU57 is not for any client state and the Russians say they will built lots of them. The "Checkmate" is vaporware at this point. It does not even exist other than a mockup.
      If you think low observable aircraft are dead you are clueless. Low band radars can NOT engage aircraft. and are easily jammed. Those radars are literally WWII technology and useless in a war setting.

  • @DJEDzTV
    @DJEDzTV 3 роки тому

    Asa Russian, i personally think this will never fly...Looks like this was done in a hurry, for some reason..

  • @greenlover247
    @greenlover247 2 роки тому

    Great name for a plane ... LOL

  • @reeceengineering3560
    @reeceengineering3560 3 роки тому

    A single engine YF-23

  • @kevinlovevlog9320
    @kevinlovevlog9320 3 роки тому +1

    if I was given to select a jet j20 from Xhina or Russia jet fighters even due it's a cheap one surely I will consider to purchase a Russian Made instead of Xhina jet fighters

  • @isodoublet
    @isodoublet 2 роки тому

    There is almost certainly AI of some form in the F-35, and there'll almost certainly really be AI of some form in the checkmate, when/if it materializes. AI is a very broad term and can mean a lot of things.

  • @didur62
    @didur62 2 роки тому

    2022 here, this thing isnt getting built lmao.

  • @waltersmilitaryclips1968
    @waltersmilitaryclips1968 3 роки тому

    Let's hope it won't fail like the su57

  • @thomasreedy1810
    @thomasreedy1810 Рік тому

    Looks like a knockoff of the F-16xj.