Large-scale production of S-70 Okhotnik will start soon!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лип 2024
  • The war in Ukraine has become a real-life testing ground for advanced weaponry, with drones taking center stage. Among these innovations is the S-70 Okhotnik, also known as Hunter-B. This unmanned combat aerial vehicle signifies Russia's push towards integrating high-tech stealth and combat capabilities into its drone fleet. The Kremlin boasts that the S-70 will be a game-changer on the battlefield and NATO is definitely watching closely.
    Russia initially planned a swift deployment of the S-70, with deliveries slated for 2024. However, this timeline has been a moving target. In April 2023, production was pushed back to no earlier than 2025. Now, recent reports suggest a potential return to a late 2024 production start. This statement was revealed by the Novosibirsk district vice-governor, where the production of this unmanned drone will take place. This inconsistency timeline leads us to confusion: when will the S-70 see service, and what role will it have in the ongoing conflict?
    Before delving into this question, let's take a closer look at the S-70’s capabilities to understand its potential role on the battlefield, whenever that may be.
    Sources:
    Scetch by paralay , www.secretprojects.co.uk/thre...
    By Vitaly Kuzmin - vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/292, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Oleh Vitaly V. Kuzmin - Vitalykuzmin.net, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    www.flaticon.com/free-icons/bomb Bomb icons created by Freepik - Flaticon
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 697

  • @OlimpiuVuia
    @OlimpiuVuia 13 днів тому +411

    You should reconsider the expression "international sanctions". Maybe it's fair enough to say "western sanctions".

    • @SunriseLAW
      @SunriseLAW 13 днів тому

      USA sanctions that other nations are bullied or cowed into agreeing with. After all, if they don't... it could be THEM subjected to USA sanctions or invasions.

    • @neowuwei7851
      @neowuwei7851 13 днів тому +43

      Yes, neither China, India and other BRICS nations pay any heed to the 'international sanctions.'

    • @colinobrien3806
      @colinobrien3806 13 днів тому +7

      your on u tube criticising that ? are you serious ? so the west isnt international ? what are you actually talking about ?

    • @intricatic
      @intricatic 13 днів тому +4

      I would prefer, "worldwide, near universal sanctions."

    • @curtismunro3244
      @curtismunro3244 13 днів тому +8

      International means between at least two nations, not ALL nations.

  • @RollerGuideX
    @RollerGuideX 13 днів тому +304

    That's some fancy looking shovel!

    • @DamonX93
      @DamonX93 13 днів тому +22

      Man this is best looking toy i seen so far

    • @SourVodka
      @SourVodka 13 днів тому +1

      Almost as big a Zelenskis nose coke shovel

    • @namborambo7186
      @namborambo7186 13 днів тому +19

      flying washing machines

    • @LankanIan
      @LankanIan 13 днів тому +16

      You are mistaken. This is a converted washing machine lol

    • @hanshuber1875
      @hanshuber1875 13 днів тому

      Oh, didnt you learn from all the other propaganda projects of russia, that went nowhere. Where are the T14 Armatas? Oh yes, russia cant mass produce them.

  • @ajoykumarbhattacharyya6100
    @ajoykumarbhattacharyya6100 13 днів тому +97

    Russians are very innovative , creative and technical minded.

    • @-FAFO-
      @-FAFO- 13 днів тому +8

      I dunno man, looks like a Wish version of things the US has been making for years now.

    • @pictograph
      @pictograph 13 днів тому

      @@-FAFO- Only in your degenerate under age mind.

    • @evananthony1395
      @evananthony1395 13 днів тому

      ​@@-FAFO- USA also has been producing JDAMs far before FAB with UMPK came around yet the UMPK bombs has an accuracy more than 95% on a battle proven ground yet the supposedly superior JDAMs US sent have only 35% chances of hitting caused by relentless jamming and GPS hacking, the only thing russia havent jam is the ATACMS which i admit is the biggest threat ukraine poses right now poses

    • @g.u.t.s1467
      @g.u.t.s1467 13 днів тому +11

      ​@@-FAFO-
      But more reliable and much cheaper, чем ваши уже закрытые проекты - джаст поверь, бро! ))

    • @noname-ji4ts
      @noname-ji4ts 13 днів тому

      ​@@g.u.t.s1467 for sure.. 😂

  • @SourVodka
    @SourVodka 13 днів тому +106

    Love all the Pro Ukrainian Cope here in the comments section the more they make fun of Russia the more they advance on the frontlines 😂😂😂😂

    • @TankMasterGo
      @TankMasterGo 11 днів тому +4

      "that the S-70 will be a game changer on the battlefield..."
      Not sure about that though... It might have ended like the "game changer" Abrams and leopard tanks on the other side of the conflict...

    • @RickBlaine
      @RickBlaine 10 днів тому +1

      It would be interesting if they did an "Exposé "on the US drones. (Sarcasm!)

    • @jozefmalik8443
      @jozefmalik8443 8 днів тому +2

      ​@@TankMasterGo
      50 ročné F- 16 ?

    • @TankMasterGo
      @TankMasterGo 8 днів тому

      ​@@jozefmalik8443
      Indeed

    • @matovicmmilan
      @matovicmmilan 8 днів тому

      ​@@jozefmalik8443
      That's right brother 👊

  • @journeyintococo6996
    @journeyintococo6996 13 днів тому +194

    When America says there will be game-changer No.15, I role my eyes. When Russia says it is going to introduce a game-change, I sit up.

    • @Glory_of_Glory_man
      @Glory_of_Glory_man 13 днів тому +9

      Until the "game changer" gets destroyed in battle by a missile/tank round.

    • @marvin902x
      @marvin902x 13 днів тому +32

      @@Glory_of_Glory_man They are not even able to shoot down ordinary KH-101 with the patriot system. Why do you think they have more luck with a real stealth plane.

    • @leathan7
      @leathan7 13 днів тому

      @@Glory_of_Glory_man it's true, last time they tried to take down a kh-101 they took down a childrens hospital and blamed it on the russians as usual. Their money is fungible with the assets destroying schools daily after all..

    • @gmdsr1177
      @gmdsr1177 13 днів тому +2

      @@marvin902x lamo!

    • @robertop7602
      @robertop7602 13 днів тому

      Che cosa vuoi dire . Non si capisce un tubo. Perchè scrivi a coppola di minghia?

  • @john4570000
    @john4570000 13 днів тому +234

    'Russia might finally have the upper hand' ?? Do you think they don't have it now?

    • @randym7961
      @randym7961 13 днів тому +21

      nope

    • @max-cs9ko
      @max-cs9ko 13 днів тому +54

      Everybody knows, but nobody accept

    • @Benz2533
      @Benz2533 13 днів тому +11

      Saw it fly along wiht the Su-57. The jet that many people claim it only for show.

    • @SunriseLAW
      @SunriseLAW 13 днів тому

      Russia definitely has the upper hand in Ukraine. What a bad joke that turned out to be for USA/NATO. USA needs to stop playing "world police" because most of the world's population objects to USA sanctions and invasions of other nations.

    • @pictograph
      @pictograph 13 днів тому

      @@Benz2533 22 are operational and delivered to the Russian army so far. Another 8 or 10 by the end of this year. Although I live in the West, I no longer listen to media fairy tales that only serve to humiliate the rest of the planet earth.

  • @petermokry8020
    @petermokry8020 13 днів тому +84

    Thanks to the sanctions, Russia now has an all local policy. If thinking that Russia is somehow dependent on foreign nations for tech makes you feel better, so be it, but it makes no difference to Russians. The engines for the SU-57, for example, used to be foreign, they are now local, and even surpass the performance of the original by at least 10%. The stealth coating and electronics is also all locally developed.

    • @fastpistonx
      @fastpistonx 13 днів тому +19

      Russia also has all the metals, including rare earths: extraction, refining, and processing/forming.

    • @fuxtube
      @fuxtube 13 днів тому

      Russia never used foreign engines in military aircrafts. You may be thinking of sukhoi superjet, not SU-57. SU-57 had two versions of AL-41, both local.

    • @asymptoticsingularity9281
      @asymptoticsingularity9281 13 днів тому

      The opposite of U.S.A🤣 China makes American's weapons. The Republicans love cheap labor. The Democrats love new voters. Bye Bye Miss American pie

    • @DrewWithington
      @DrewWithington 13 днів тому +3

      But they can't make high performance CPU chips.

    • @hanshuber1875
      @hanshuber1875 13 днів тому +6

      hahaha without western tech modern russia wouldnt even exist.

  • @CraigTheBrute-yf7no
    @CraigTheBrute-yf7no 13 днів тому +46

    That is one very aerodynamic washing machine!

    • @a.m.9357
      @a.m.9357 13 днів тому +5

      Yes, washing machine jokes coming from the same hypocrites who beg Russia to take and bring back their so-called astronauts to/from space... hahahah

  • @LankanIan
    @LankanIan 13 днів тому +33

    Russia's most significant advantage is that the US military-industrial complex makes many underhand payments to US and NATO politicians, and its cost of production is three times that of Russia. If NATO lets this war continue, the innovations Russia (and China) makes will be hard to catch up with.

    • @sirrathersplendid4825
      @sirrathersplendid4825 13 днів тому +3

      You think there’s no corruption in the Soviet arms industry?
      😆😂🤣

    • @flpmlks5181
      @flpmlks5181 13 днів тому +8

      @@sirrathersplendid4825 arms industry in russia is state owned. explain me, how corruption works in that case?- paying politicians to approve high spending on overpriced weapons. who pays them? people, they put into charge? arms idustry in the west owns state. :D

    • @sirrathersplendid4825
      @sirrathersplendid4825 13 днів тому

      @@flpmlks5181 - As in any state-owned enterprise, money just disappears between the cracks in the floorboards. If you don’t want to believe it happens in Russia, just look at China. Tower blocks get built from tofu dregs because the bosses ‘repurpose’ the concrete to build themselves mansions.

    • @alexstein92
      @alexstein92 13 днів тому

      ​​@@flpmlks5181state owned...suppliers aren't dumbass...

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 12 днів тому +2

      @@sirrathersplendid4825
      its almost none, as with such a small budget Russia is capable of being ahead of US with its 750 blns

  • @lesliethomas7234
    @lesliethomas7234 13 днів тому +53

    What do you mean by "Russia may finally have the upper hand"? Doesn't Russia already, and has always had the upper hand?

    • @fastpistonx
      @fastpistonx 13 днів тому +12

      From impartial assessments, Russia has a 5- 10 year lead in electronic warfare, logistics skills, tactical skills, industrial military complex, self sufficiency in metals, rare earths, energy sources, no debt, general military staffing and skills training,

    • @graceland395
      @graceland395 13 днів тому

      Typical brainwashed MSM human

    • @KSmithwick1989
      @KSmithwick1989 13 днів тому +2

      ​@@fastpistonx What is that assessment on EW based on. Given Russia makes thst claim yet never backs it with substantial evidence.
      Not to mention Russia is notorious for logistics. Simply looking at the ammo storage methods is obvious. They're still loading 122 mm rockets in wooden crates, each of which need to be handloaded. As opposed to NATO using preloaded modules on their M142s, M270s, and derivatives.

    • @Orlington17
      @Orlington17 12 днів тому +9

      @@KSmithwick1989
      and that is comparison that should lead us to any objective conclusion? 65 blns Russia's udget against 900 blns USA and Russia has better air defence systems, Russia has hypersonic weapons and higher production rates, much higher not only than US but the whole NATO. It is 2 years against ~mln regular army supported by NATO money, sattelites, intelligence services, mercenaries, instructors and weapons and Russia has Crimea, the whole Azov sea, 150 thousands of square km of Ukraine territory, which is 75% of Novorussia. Compare this to US and NATO, who been for 20 years in AFghan to beat taliban, who took control over country a week before NATO ran away from there. They been bombing Syria for 4 years and ISIS numbers and territory control only grew, while Russia came and finished them in 1 year. Under all the sanctions Russia became #1 economy in Europe. Now Russia is building new world order with BRICS. Yeah, i think Russia has always had the upper hand!

    • @cotizacionesequipo1719
      @cotizacionesequipo1719 11 днів тому +3

      @@KSmithwick1989 And how exactly is that working out for NATO on the battlefield?, which is where it counts.
      NATO is doomed.

  • @denxero
    @denxero 10 днів тому +5

    "Russia might finally have the upper hand" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Bro is stuck in Summer of 2022.

  • @FutureRobinHood
    @FutureRobinHood 13 днів тому +8

    "Russia might finally have the upper hand" Russia has had the upper hand this whole time you dingus.

  • @oldhag2881
    @oldhag2881 13 днів тому +17

    Russia ALREADY HAS the upper hand in the conflict in Ukraine. It's silly to think Russia can't produce needed components domestically. Importing components was a cost saving measure.

  • @frommordorwithlove4844
    @frommordorwithlove4844 13 днів тому +21

    Okhotnic translated as Hunter

    • @albertf.2639
      @albertf.2639 13 днів тому

      LOL !!HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA6 IF THEY ARE LUCKY IT WILL BE FLYING IN 2035 ?? AHHAAHAHAH !@ IT IS GOING TO BE A PIECES OF SHIT 💩💩 MADE BY CLOWNS🤡🤡

    • @g.u.t.s1467
      @g.u.t.s1467 13 днів тому +6

      Экзектли, йоупта! )
      💪😎👍

  • @MDin5001
    @MDin5001 13 днів тому +45

    Russia has friend like China. It won't be long ... Russia has built their fighter jets engine so making newer smaller quieter and longer-range jet engine are achievable.

    • @Glory_of_Glory_man
      @Glory_of_Glory_man 13 днів тому +2

      Quieter ISN'T important in battle, stealth is. This drone obviously has none of that, example:
      The engine is sticking out of the back.

    • @alexanderjason434
      @alexanderjason434 13 днів тому +8

      @@Glory_of_Glory_mannato Propaganda

    • @denarjan
      @denarjan 13 днів тому +1

      @@alexanderjason434 Agree, it seems impossible to me the US hasn't used this conflict to test out their radar penetrating capabilities with their "magic bullets". And probably found it severely lacking, together with only 29 - 60% airworthiness, and with sanctions policies disrupting supply lines, (probably making building new ones twice or thrice as expensive), deemed unsustainable to continue that strategy. If the conclusion was anything else we'd have seen a lot more chest thumping and self congratulating behavior.

    • @mng8680
      @mng8680 13 днів тому +7

      ​​@@denarjan
      US is likely worried their magic bullet equipment would be destroyed or even worse captured by Russia to be studied cause they were never tested against the tech of a near peer adversary, that would not only hurt sales and reputation of US equipment but also potentially give Russia valuable information on how to counter US.

    • @ZincFold
      @ZincFold 13 днів тому +7

      @@denarjan U.S weapons come with an overrate price and sales pitch. Only proven somewhat effective against poor defenceless countries. Against a peer military like Russia's not so much.

  • @vallietmc9553
    @vallietmc9553 13 днів тому +73

    Coincidence, Hunter Biden?

    • @rgw5991
      @rgw5991 13 днів тому +12

      cocaine powered airship

    • @Statueshop297
      @Statueshop297 13 днів тому

      Coincidence

    • @CleverThoughts1
      @CleverThoughts1 13 днів тому +1

      QAnon ?

    • @gordonwardhaugh8266
      @gordonwardhaugh8266 13 днів тому +4

      No it's just Q we are Anon ! And just wait when Trump gets into office this war will end and there will be peace❤❤

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 13 днів тому

      You have to understand the truth. The against RF in Ukraine is personal. Putin is threatening their supply of girls, coke, pharmaceuticals, $$$

  • @MLambdaman
    @MLambdaman 13 днів тому +9

    They stole that much washing machines ?!

  • @georgekaradov1274
    @georgekaradov1274 13 днів тому +52

    One thing the NAFO fanboys, that get hard on fantasizing abour NATO weapons, do not realize tis the fact that if you do not have a pilot, there are a lots of things that you can do that normal planes will never be able to match.. supermanuverability that require ver high g forces for example. Extream acceleration. Weapons payload persentage as part of the tottal take of weight...AI controled swarm tactics, extream reaction time way above human reaction time... do i need to continue?

    • @Monkey-ud8bw
      @Monkey-ud8bw 13 днів тому +2

      You are absolutely correct, and if you think NATO doesn’t know this you’re delusional. As for swarms Russia doesn’t have enough to have a gaggle, let alone a swarm.
      I’d doubt it’s even that stealthy considering that it has a great big engine hanging out of its rear end.

    • @georgekaradov1274
      @georgekaradov1274 13 днів тому

      @@Monkey-ud8bw training of AI for swarms operations starts with 2-3 working together. This is only the beginning.
      On another hand NATO may know this, but apparently the NAFO fanboys do not know or are not permuted to say so by the people who are controlling them - thing 3 letter organization...

    • @dcliffe8539
      @dcliffe8539 12 днів тому

      @@Monkey-ud8bw and they look like shovels, it's a scam, sabotage.

    • @RickBlaine
      @RickBlaine 10 днів тому

      @@Monkey-ud8bw "You doubt". I'm sure that upsets the Russians.

    • @Monkey-ud8bw
      @Monkey-ud8bw 10 днів тому

      @@RickBlaine I agree, I also doubt that some random on YT giving their opinion is something that they would get upset about. Considering they are throwing men’s lives away by the thousands, my opinion is nothing.

  • @MrAce2000
    @MrAce2000 13 днів тому +49

    This just further shows that Russia and China are not to be messed with and not to be underestimated. America your time as a top dog is over

    • @Glory_of_Glory_man
      @Glory_of_Glory_man 13 днів тому +3

      It's a knockoff from an old American drone.

    • @scrubvision5652
      @scrubvision5652 13 днів тому +11

      @@Glory_of_Glory_man cry more

    • @albertf.2639
      @albertf.2639 13 днів тому

      LOL @! YOU ALL BETTER START EATING CHEERIOS CEREALS EVERY DAY.. ??@ NEVER WILL THAT HAPPEN RUSSIA IS 50 YEARS BEHIND , CHINA 25 YEAR LOL @@

    • @tyronebenson4183
      @tyronebenson4183 13 днів тому

      I’m so scared 😂😂😂😂😂 those two “territories” couldn’t fight their way out of an outhouse. Let me know if you want to know what an outhouse is 😂😂😂😂

    • @CashCatz
      @CashCatz 13 днів тому +4

      @@Glory_of_Glory_man Which make and model of drone is it a knockoff of?

  • @bigtoad45
    @bigtoad45 13 днів тому +7

    Now you know it's full of washing machine computer chips....

  • @justadumbdeer.985
    @justadumbdeer.985 13 днів тому +4

    Well S-70 will be the wingman of the SU-57, some analysts have spotted the SU-57 in a two-seated version, giving the idea that the second pilot will be the radio operator for the S-70.

  • @josemanuelgarcia4406
    @josemanuelgarcia4406 10 днів тому +2

    The engine looks top-notch! 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @NDR-hn3ue
    @NDR-hn3ue 13 днів тому +7

    *It becomes self aware at 2:14 am Eastern Time*

  • @storyanaksekolah2
    @storyanaksekolah2 13 днів тому +31

    the real game changer

    • @Ghost12561
      @Ghost12561 13 днів тому +1

      just like what they say about the T-90 and SU 57

    • @nemiw4429
      @nemiw4429 13 днів тому

      ​@@Ghost12561 west has given ukrops several hundred billions and yet ukrops keep losing ground. Cope harder.

    • @mirtalpur739
      @mirtalpur739 13 днів тому +4

      @@Ghost12561we never said that about those vehicles but Abrams and F-16 were called but failed.

    • @pierre5473
      @pierre5473 10 днів тому

      @@Ghost12561 and T-14 Armata ...

  • @Karu617th
    @Karu617th 12 днів тому +3

    amazing the shape an aircraft takes when there is no need to design for a pilot.

  • @fidel4023
    @fidel4023 13 днів тому +3

    Western* Sanctions not International.
    It's not even close to half the worlds population that has sanctioned RU.

  • @azerovc
    @azerovc 13 днів тому +16

    But they still haven't resolve the jet exhaust nozzle...

    • @pictograph
      @pictograph 13 днів тому +15

      That is not really important with Russian planes, maneuverability and speed are its virtues and they will always rely on that. Russian planes are not designed to be invasion devices that operate at remote points in the world like the American ones, but to be close to or under the umbrella of their powerful anti-air defenses.

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 13 днів тому +9

      You're wrong. Look to the Second Test prototype photos, they are available. It has the flat nozzle already. It is not crucial for a subsonic aircraft which the S-70 is, but very crucial for a supersonic aircraft (reduce of thrust by 18%-24%)...

    • @marvin902x
      @marvin902x 13 днів тому +5

      They solved the problem on the newest iteration of the SU-57 with it's new engines. So I think they maybe already have a solution for the S70. The video here shows only the prototype, so changes in the production model are still possible.

    • @amr8457
      @amr8457 13 днів тому +4

      That's been long resolved.

    • @KSmithwick1989
      @KSmithwick1989 13 днів тому

      ​@@marvin902x Really, Su-57M hasn't entered production. Not to out Su-57 has been flying with a stand-in engine for decade is pretty bad.
      China had the same issue with J-20. It was flying around with the WS-10. Which a horrible powerplant for a fighter, because it's a high by-pass design meant for airliners. Based on the French-American CMF56.

  • @bcwoj
    @bcwoj 11 днів тому +2

    "Hunter-B" It's so cute that they named it after the US president's son!! :-D

  • @daniellabbe916
    @daniellabbe916 13 днів тому +2

    Sanctions? What sanctions? Where there's a will, there's a way around sanctions!

  • @eminencerain848
    @eminencerain848 13 днів тому +2

    You mean like just how large scale production of their newest tank and stealth fighter was suppose to start a decade ago and turn out not to live up to the hype?

  • @Youcomeasuare
    @Youcomeasuare 13 днів тому +2

    At this point does Russia have any shovels or washing machines left?

    • @warrenjones5077
      @warrenjones5077 19 годин тому

      Lots of shovels left, the poor Russians that were holding them are now cannon fodder for the rich Russians in the Ukrainian.

  • @mm650
    @mm650 13 днів тому +8

    The S-70 looks interesting, but the manufacturing limitation are key. This is an advanced platform that is going to to require many of the same VERY VERY limited resources that production of the Su-57 requires... In the last 5 years, Russia has only managed to make 32 of them, and that counts 10 test-articles. So how many S-70s are they going to be able to make? And just as importantly will they be able to maintain production ofother advanced aerial platforms like the SU-57 while they make S-70s, or will it just be robbing Peter to pay Paul?

    • @off6848
      @off6848 13 днів тому +4

      Easily. You’re talking about a country with an intact industrial base not gutted like western countries
      I think your concerns apply far more to NATO countries
      3 explosions in the last few months at weapons facilities said to be due to surging production passed what they were made to take
      USA and UK doctrine was always to create low yields of ultra advanced weapons the private MIC and political sell out of industry means that production is snail pace

    • @mm650
      @mm650 11 днів тому

      @@off6848 Russia's industrial base wasn't intact even before they invaded Crimea. They are functionally a 3rd world resource extraction economy that also has with nukes. Their only really thriving industry is resource extraction and that was only brought online again with MASSIVE help from western firms who have now left.
      You call the US industrial base "gutted" because you don't understand what an industrial base IS. You think it's factories and raw materials and energy. That's obsolete thinking. What makes an industrial base work is PEOPLE. Not, brute labor mind you, SKILLED labor, TRAINED labor, ADAPTABLE labor. The KEY thing that makes the Russian economy NOT a "intact industrial base" is a profound lack of SKILLED PEOPLE.
      The Soviet education system for technical ans scientific training (we're talking about the equivalent of graduate engineering programs, trade schools here) collapsed for what can only be described as 'Soviet Reasons' in the mid 1980s... insofar as the Soviets replaced it with anything it was just ideological indoctrination, and it was never repaired or replaced in the 30 years since the fall of the USSR. What this means in 2024 is that if a person is all both of the following: (1) Russian, and (2) Can be described as any kind of "engineer", they are either 65 years old or older, or they are foreign trained. The 65+ cadre are aging out and retiring. The younger cadre are mostly no ideologically aligned with Putin, and HAVE OPTIONS. (At a minimum they speak a foreign language well enough to pass classes in that language, have a non-Russian and therefore internationally acceptable degree, and have contacts amongst their former class mates and professors outside Russia.) These younger Russian engineers are LEAVING RUSSIA overwhelmingly.
      The above failure of the Russian technical training system is further compounded by the fact that Russia is in demographic free-fall. There are more 60 year old than 50 year old, more 50 year old than 40 year old, more 30 year olds than 20 year olds... Even before they started leaving there weren't that many young Russians to begin with!
      This lack of skilled cadre can be seen everywhere in recent Russian military and civilian failures. Look at the drone-attacks on refineries... these refineries are going down down days, weeks, even in some cases months! These drone attacks are not THAT devastating! They should be coming back online in minutes or hours vs most of these attacks. They aren't because the people manning them are PROFOUNDLY under-trained. Why? Because all of the skilled people are being pulled into work more critical to the war effort.
      Nope, if Russia hadn't inherited the Soviet Nukes, we would just regime change them like any other failed state that becomes a nuisance.

  • @rgthomson1
    @rgthomson1 13 днів тому +3

    A Hunter B i dread to wonder whats on its computer

  • @luiscigar4683
    @luiscigar4683 13 днів тому +6

    CF S-70 OKHOTNIK

  • @Dhjgdfjh
    @Dhjgdfjh 13 днів тому +3

    I’m pretty sure the drone is annoyed by the pilot and his flying dump truck

  • @Marcellogo
    @Marcellogo 13 днів тому +2

    Let's Say that the S-70okhotnik B could jusn not enter service BEFORE it complete its own testing and receive an OFFICIAL designation from the MoD, S- and T- designation are linked to prototypes so, that means that they are still in (the very final part of) testing.
    So even the eventual discrepancies in dates is meaningless there , they have the serial assembly line in the making , so that would begin production a.s.a. the testing is over but would need some time to optimize the output and receive enough of them to operate on field.

    • @alexanderjason434
      @alexanderjason434 13 днів тому +1

      On Field
      If you have the upper hand by Cruise missiles, artillery, Air & masses
      You can Test your stuff ON FIELD

  • @jl3269
    @jl3269 9 днів тому +1

    Made by the same manufacturer than the terminator tank . 😂

  • @maxgaetz7432
    @maxgaetz7432 9 днів тому +1

    why didn't they cover up that exhaust ?

  • @gmnotyet
    @gmnotyet 13 днів тому +2

    OMG, that is UNMANNED. Yikes!

  • @NDR-hn3ue
    @NDR-hn3ue 13 днів тому +2

    And here we.........................GO

  • @jameshatfield2473
    @jameshatfield2473 13 днів тому +2

    Hunter B , why ? Does it smoke Crack before each mission ? 😂😂

  • @rogerboniface8086
    @rogerboniface8086 13 днів тому +1

    All modern flying wings owe their existance to the Jurgen brother who designed it on a garage circa 1945. Sometimes known as the Horten/Gotha 229.The resemblance is very striking.

  • @sonnyeastham
    @sonnyeastham 2 дні тому +1

    A surfaced-submarine RATO launched version being developed for the US Atlantic Ghost-Line soon 😮

  • @bcwoj
    @bcwoj 11 днів тому +1

    It looks like it has some gigantic pitot tubes protruding out in front.

  • @bharathyadav1589
    @bharathyadav1589 13 днів тому +5

    Finnally some real game changing tech

  • @theweegie123
    @theweegie123 12 днів тому +1

    Its looking suspiciously like china's " game changer " stealth drone

  • @williamkern500
    @williamkern500 12 днів тому +1

    Will it be produced en mass with the Armata and the Su57?

  • @chiekiugochukwusunday2
    @chiekiugochukwusunday2 13 днів тому +6

    According to my CNN BBC Telegraph & The Sun said that the sanctions crippled Russian economy, and they can't process any production of any kinds of military advance technology 😅😅😅😅😅😅

  • @hamzak2181
    @hamzak2181 12 днів тому +1

    'Large scale production of the S-70 Okhotnik will start soon!'
    Yes we are all aware of how good the Russians are at following deadlines 😂😂

  • @Demoratos
    @Demoratos 6 днів тому +1

    Забавно когда говорят что Россия зависит от технологий других стран, но ещё забавней когда НАТО и США не могут пользоваться своими технологиями, потому что зависят от ресурсов других стран

  • @user-nb5nm4ol8p
    @user-nb5nm4ol8p 13 днів тому +6

    they need too many wash machines chips to make one

  • @chamberpot969
    @chamberpot969 13 днів тому +3

    It's a Horton.

    • @andiecho6339
      @andiecho6339 13 днів тому

      Out the melted ice of New Swabia 😂

  • @Neyreyan
    @Neyreyan 13 днів тому

    The su-57 will always fly in the buddy sytem now😂

  • @ssINchan
    @ssINchan 13 днів тому +4

    Engine is wide open for missile seekers.😂

    • @Zim-ks6pb
      @Zim-ks6pb 13 днів тому

      Didnt help the F115 from getting shot down?

    • @maksimluzin1121
      @maksimluzin1121 13 днів тому +1

      Look to the second test prototype of the S-70, the photos are available. It has the flat nozzle already. It is not crucial for a subsonic aircraft, but very crucial for a supersonic. The flat nozzles reduce thrust by 18-24% for the same engine with circular nozzles. Tested & proven!

    • @SofaKingShit
      @SofaKingShit 13 днів тому

      Too small for anti missle devices like flares you think?

    • @BlackPill-pu4vi
      @BlackPill-pu4vi 13 днів тому +1

      Yes. It needs a large air bypass to allow cooler airflow to shroud the exhaust and reduce the exhaust temperature.

    • @dexlab7539
      @dexlab7539 13 днів тому +2

      IR missiles are short range. Enemy aircraft dead before that

  • @user-ej6if8uu6v
    @user-ej6if8uu6v 13 днів тому

    Can S-70 Okhotnik carry FAB500 , FAB1000 or ODAB1500 or FAB3000 ?

  • @GenghisX999
    @GenghisX999 13 днів тому +1

    ..but but the F35 also has a wingman drone, well it is tethered to the rear of the F35 with a string, but it is still a wing man drone.😝

  • @florincosma
    @florincosma 13 днів тому +1

    Soon? Should have started 2 years ago.

  • @indigenoustruthspeaker3129
    @indigenoustruthspeaker3129 13 днів тому

    Look at someone took ace combat 7 drone story very seriously

  • @TheRajmoney
    @TheRajmoney 13 днів тому +6

    Can it beat the American Tic Tac drone

  • @Voltaire7
    @Voltaire7 9 днів тому

    But how did they get it to work with washing machine chips?

  • @usernamename2978
    @usernamename2978 11 днів тому +1

    Real soon now.......real soon...

  • @Fergus_science
    @Fergus_science 13 днів тому +10

    They can actually seek China's help

    • @robertop7602
      @robertop7602 13 днів тому

      Qual'è il soggetto. Chi è che dovrebbe chiedere aiuto?

    • @tyronebenson4183
      @tyronebenson4183 13 днів тому +1

      For what…how to build a better junk😂😂😂😂

    • @Fighter4Street
      @Fighter4Street 13 днів тому

      China knows better because USA will sanction them.

  • @pierre5473
    @pierre5473 10 днів тому +1

    "Large-scale production of S-70 Okhotnik will start soon!" like "Kiev is falling soon" in february 2022 ?

  • @cultistpriest1872
    @cultistpriest1872 12 днів тому +1

    Night Hawk from Temu

  • @novascotianinfj
    @novascotianinfj 11 днів тому +2

    large scale production? China building these?

  • @callumbush1
    @callumbush1 10 днів тому

    They already had those in SG-1.

  • @madmaximus2836
    @madmaximus2836 2 дні тому

    Large-scale production will start right after mass production of the Su-57 and T-14 start. Should happen any decade now.

  • @supersayianjim2
    @supersayianjim2 13 днів тому +1

    they dont need the s70's they have drones from iran.

    • @fred4687
      @fred4687 13 днів тому +1

      Different purposes

    • @jacobjorgenson9285
      @jacobjorgenson9285 8 днів тому +1

      Iran drone are very low tech , low flight great for overwhelming air defence systems so they waste $1,00,000 missiles on $20,000 drones

  • @phrog773
    @phrog773 13 днів тому

    Large scale like the su-57 or large scale like the t-14?

  • @jonathon5411
    @jonathon5411 12 днів тому

    No my ai friend the s70 flying next to su57 was the loyal wingman tests this is what turns su57 into sixth gen fighter

  • @brandonluu6665
    @brandonluu6665 13 днів тому +3

    On one hand you create vids about Russian weapons and on the other hand you will downplay or even belittle them with your narrations. Guess it's too difficult to be neutral.

    • @kevinwulf8608
      @kevinwulf8608 13 днів тому

      Psst 🤫..... this is a russian channel pretending being neutral 😅

  • @oniecchi
    @oniecchi 13 днів тому +3

    For those who blame about massive production let me tell you something:
    🇺🇲: work for profit... Mass production less cuallity or reapeting the same mistake in every item.
    🇷🇺: Work for country... They build few example and conduct many test to find, fix and even improve before production.

  • @operator9858
    @operator9858 3 дні тому

    Russia should name it: The Shovel.

  • @simplelifeph
    @simplelifeph 11 днів тому

    Looks like a knock-off of US B2-Spirit. Russia should bring back the design of the Su-47 Berkut for its new generation jets. They look super cool.

  • @xanderdylan5085
    @xanderdylan5085 13 днів тому

    So Russia now has a 6th gen aircraft which have completed testing and now is entering production damn and they say Russia is miles behind USA on highly advanced jets they already have two 6th gens on the way and the ngad has even seen its prototype

  • @richardmccann1516
    @richardmccann1516 13 днів тому

    Stealth Technology: The S-70 Okhotnik is equipped with stealth technology, including a flat nozzle, to reduce its radar cross-section and increase its survivability.
    Heavy-Strike Capability: The drone is designed for heavy-strike missions, capable of carrying precision-guided munitions (PGMs) and air-to-surface missiles.
    Long-Range Capability: The S-70 Okhotnik has a range of 6,000 km (3,728 miles), making it a formidable asset for long-range missions.
    Autonomous Flight: The drone is capable of autonomous flight, allowing it to operate independently or in tandem with manned aircraft.
    Manned-Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T): The S-70 Okhotnik can be integrated with manned aircraft, such as the Su-57, to provide a loyal wingman capability.

    • @SuperM00b
      @SuperM00b 11 днів тому

      It can also wash and dry clothes at formidable speed.

  • @bobgreen9980
    @bobgreen9980 13 днів тому

    *Gee, this drone looks very familiar,,,,,,,.*

  • @poordave9102
    @poordave9102 13 днів тому +6

    nothing stealthily about that engine and probes sticking out of the nose

    • @isaacomole9527
      @isaacomole9527 13 днів тому +3

      How do you know? Are you an expert?

    • @falconmesa2809
      @falconmesa2809 13 днів тому

      @@isaacomole9527 it is not stelthy to have probes poking out

    • @aachoocrony5754
      @aachoocrony5754 13 днів тому

      ​@@isaacomole9527He's done research. Have you? No such thing as 100% stealth.

    • @pictograph
      @pictograph 13 днів тому +1

      @@aachoocrony5754 What research? Where? When? Evidence? Links? Nothing? Just "trust me bro" gibberish... 🤣

    • @aachoocrony5754
      @aachoocrony5754 13 днів тому

      @@pictograph err no, obviously he knows things. You've done zero. Absolutely no impact when you read his comment which made a very good point.

  • @veronicalogotheti1162
    @veronicalogotheti1162 10 днів тому

    Very nice

  • @ktgohdt125
    @ktgohdt125 12 днів тому

    the two fork...Hmmmm
    now that explain how X-wing got their design from ...

  • @gondaljutt7059
    @gondaljutt7059 13 днів тому

    West saying they using wash machine chips.
    How they saying that unbelievable

  • @sangmoon2464
    @sangmoon2464 13 днів тому

    I guess they gave up on building any significant number of Su-57s

  • @MR.07105
    @MR.07105 13 днів тому

    Where is the su 57?

  • @junn679
    @junn679 13 днів тому

    nah, Lancet is the true aerial hunter
    s-70 will be more like a aerial eye

  • @christophmahler
    @christophmahler 12 днів тому

    Ukraine has no air force, anymore - Poland doesn't dare to send fighters beyond it's air space - what's the rush of a stealth drone in comparison to front line aviation ?...

  • @mohamedinasofficial3723
    @mohamedinasofficial3723 13 днів тому +1

    Russia has more than 6500 sanctions on it. Despite these sanctions it has become one of the highest income countries in 2024 according to world bank. Do you think Russia can not achieve its goals in the future? Sanctions are just a word for Russia.

  • @TankMasterGo
    @TankMasterGo 11 днів тому

    "that the S-70 will be a game changer on the battlefield..."
    Mmm I dont think that will... Because the last time people call a western made tank will be a "game changer" on the battlefield does not end very well on the front...

  • @kazimkorkmaz
    @kazimkorkmaz 13 днів тому

    Only ANKA3 ( a Turkish-made Monoplane ) flies smoothly and stably.

  • @user-oy5mm3pb2g
    @user-oy5mm3pb2g 13 днів тому +1

    Ukrainians will start looking up soon to see brand new washing machines cleaning up their towns and cities.

  • @leoshell9399
    @leoshell9399 13 днів тому

    Looks like B-2 bomber?

    • @flpmlks5181
      @flpmlks5181 13 днів тому +1

      and that looks like german horten. it seems aerodynamics work everywhere the same :D

  • @BobSmith-ui4qu
    @BobSmith-ui4qu 13 днів тому

    What the hell is that!

  • @MrKingmino
    @MrKingmino 11 днів тому

    What's the US to do about Chinese components in all of their equipment? Go research.

  • @bergssprangare
    @bergssprangare 13 днів тому +36

    Russia has become an expert in defeating NATO weapons. Soon the sky will be owned by the AI Drones

    • @TDS1108Gaming
      @TDS1108Gaming 13 днів тому +12

      Russia: *proceeds to get obliterated by Soviet surplus junk*
      Some braindead drone on the internet: “Russia has become an ‘expert’ in defeating NATO weapons”

    • @JDStone20
      @JDStone20 13 днів тому +5

      NATO Weapons that are 40 years old, you mean.

    • @bergssprangare
      @bergssprangare 13 днів тому +1

      @@JDStone20 No, weapons that cost 20x more than Russian and are only good to destroy sandal fighters

    • @bergssprangare
      @bergssprangare 13 днів тому

      @@TDS1108Gaming $m USD Abrahams destroyed by s 500USD Drone..: It's 40 years old...Money has no age..but smell corruption

    • @georgekaradov1274
      @georgekaradov1274 13 днів тому +1

      ​@TDS1108Gaming whoooo, is that the state of the NAFO fanboys nowadays? I am nor sure if i should laugh or cry...

  • @rochus_wagner
    @rochus_wagner 13 днів тому

    It definitely does NOT contain Fake Titanium! ✌🐻✌

  • @user-oy5mm3pb2g
    @user-oy5mm3pb2g 13 днів тому

    "Ukraine is a battle laboratory." Ben Wallace

  • @ashish_p_sasi
    @ashish_p_sasi 13 днів тому +1

    🇮🇳🇮🇳ഇന്ത്യ❤റഷ്യ🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @beyenehabte7072
    @beyenehabte7072 13 днів тому

    Why you guys say international sanction and Iran helps Rusia are u joking?

  • @krzysztofgregorczyk1443
    @krzysztofgregorczyk1443 12 днів тому +1

    Piękny

  • @BobSmith-ui4qu
    @BobSmith-ui4qu 13 днів тому

    Put a couple of plus rifles on it and Star Wars is real.

  • @ahnafjihan4996
    @ahnafjihan4996 9 днів тому

    it looks like B 2