How Quantum Computing Will Change The World!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 чер 2024
  • What exactly is quantum computing? Should we be exploring its possibilities?
    Follow Crystal on Twitter: / polycrystalhd
    Read More:
    Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time
    www.nature.com/nature/journal/...
    “Space-like separation of entangled quantum states is a central concept in fundamental investigations of quantum mechanics and in quantum communication applications.”
    Quantum Computing Market Forecast 2015-2020
    www.marketresearchmedia.com/?p...
    “On October 4th, 2012, D-Wave Systems Inc., a Canadian quantum computing startup, has announced that it has closed $30 million in VC funding from Bezos Expeditions and In-Q-Tel (venture arm of the U.S. Intelligence Community).”
    ____________________
    DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily.
    Watch More DNews on TestTube testtube.com/dnews
    Subscribe now! ua-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
    DNews on Twitter / dnews
    Trace Dominguez on Twitter / tracedominguez
    Julia Wilde on Twitter / julia_sci
    DNews on Facebook / discoverynews
    DNews on Google+ gplus.to/dnews
    Discovery News discoverynews.com
    Download the TestTube App: testu.be/1ndmmMq
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 998

  • @alexanderm2220
    @alexanderm2220 9 років тому +711

    physics doesn't make it possible, nature makes it possible. Physics makes it measureable

    • @sumandark8600
      @sumandark8600 9 років тому +51

      You clearly have no grasp of the definition of the word physics then do you...

    • @brotalnia
      @brotalnia 9 років тому +20

      you sound like a hippy

    • @abah2077
      @abah2077 9 років тому +4

      brotalnia what is "hippy"

    • @zeiitgeist
      @zeiitgeist 9 років тому +49

      sumandark8600 He/She is right as the definition of physics is just 'the study/knowledge of physical phenomenon/characteristic' and measurable in approximations with the aid of axioms, variable, geometry and constants in relation to one another, whereas the natural properties of matter or sub-atomic particles are the system that allow its states to achieve objective outputs relatively when it is tried to produce a reliable outcome (approximated numbers for engineers mean little without a table of recorded data to compare when designing a device to churn out product). It is people who shout "Science!" at the end of an experiment or an explanation that doesn't understand the word science (which means 'knowledge') and wrongly tie that word to anything/phenomena that governs the universe as science, as for an example "So why is the sky blue? Because of 'Rayleigh Scattering', Science!" (as if the atmosphere scattering incoming light from the sun = science) and not to actually mean the 'study of the natural world', however there are those who do know its meaning but shout it anyways in a try hard effort to grasp onto their laymen audiences' attention/interest but many times paint the wrong image that usually leads to the problem stated before.

    • @sumandark8600
      @sumandark8600 9 років тому +25

      zeiitgeist Ok, you are confusing the study of physics with actual physics. Physics is an intrinsic part of the universe that existed before we discovered it, much like mathematics; maths never gets invented it just gets discovered, all that we create is the language we use to describe it.
      The definition of the word physics actually stems from the old greek words phusis and phusika meaning nature and natural things respectively. A single physic is a single physical thing or single phenomena of physical properties of such a thing. A physical thing is merely something that exists. Colloquially speaking it need not be actually physical. The study of physics however is the study of these phenomena; trying to deduce how they interact with each other.
      Also when you say the study of the natural world you are referring to phenomena that is not caused by the planet and are as such erroneous in your statement. It irks me to no end when people make fundamental errors like this but are too blissfully ignorant to notice them. Even if the phenomena where of this world then your statement would still be un-needingly heavy in its wording as everything that exists is natural so if it is of this world it is natural. People again erroneously use the word natural by referring to it as if the colloquial definitions were true; i.e. "standard" or "normal" or "organic". In fact everything both in nature and by nature is natural. E.g automobiles; automobiles are a form of transport used by humans to make travelling and traversing terrain easier, they are a natural advancement of nature as they are a tool created by humans to aid them and humans are themselves animals, henceforth by extension any creation of theirs is natural and by extension that everything in the universe had a natural origin, everything in the universe is natural and therefore a form of existing nature. However nature merely exists it does not denote how things act and exist like physics does. Similar to numbers; numbers just exist and does not denote how numbers are used, that is the job of mathematics.
      There are plenty of definitions and the like that people don't truly understand not due to their own faults but those of lesser minded society trying to use words incorrectly such as the fact that hardly anybody knows that pronouns are not actual words so I don't blame you for being misinformed whether it be analogously speaking by the 2nd 3rd of 4th derivative of error. To be fair it doesn't help when public dictionaries are constantly being updated to include misnomers o.e, but do please attempt to learn the basics of language before attempting to correct someone else instead of just misinformedly postulating misconstrued facts and ideas. :)

  • @imstillw8ing
    @imstillw8ing 8 років тому +453

    Old computers: 2+2=4
    Quantum computers: 2+2=cat

    • @jalalasif7471
      @jalalasif7471 7 років тому +43

      Joseph Taylor But is it a living cat or a dead one?

    • @imstillw8ing
      @imstillw8ing 7 років тому +18

      That...was the joke. schroders cat. Physics joke. Ha.. Ha..

    • @jonbellamy2714
      @jonbellamy2714 7 років тому +7

      Schrodinger*...

    • @SonGoli
      @SonGoli 7 років тому +4

      So 1+2=dog

    • @GumbaverianX
      @GumbaverianX 7 років тому +17

      Joseph Taylor 6+9=Porn

  • @aliengrey6992
    @aliengrey6992 9 років тому +660

    For us Quantum Computers are like Old school calculators.

    • @VeggieBond
      @VeggieBond 9 років тому +91

      Take me to your planet please!

    • @rock3tcatU233
      @rock3tcatU233 8 років тому +10

      Chix with Dix PLZ

    • @leoLorenzi
      @leoLorenzi 8 років тому +30

      +Alien Grey So what do you use then? Dark energy manipulation and black hole super position as a power source? Then again it just may be in your smartphone. You may probably use multiple universes as a power source and compressed super massive black holes for manipulation for your laptop computer. Now i wonder what your species best type of computer may use.

    • @conpa18dany
      @conpa18dany 8 років тому +47

      But can your computer run club penguin at 30 fps? Don't think so buddy. Fuck off to your planet m8

    • @LayeredHen
      @LayeredHen 7 років тому +15

      VR porn on a quantum computer

  • @morrius0757
    @morrius0757 7 років тому +135

    How to build a budget gaming quantum computer for under 2 billion dollars!

    • @OmerFlame
      @OmerFlame 6 років тому +2

      This is a good idea. I'm gonna go to Linus Tech Tips, and ask from him to make a tutorial

    • @KevinP32270
      @KevinP32270 5 років тому

      LOL

    • @En_theo
      @En_theo 4 роки тому

      Please don't make it a Windows, please don't make it a Windows, please don't make it a Windows...

    • @78anurag
      @78anurag 2 роки тому

      **Kevin MacLeod's Life of Riley starts playing in background**

  • @GingerFTW00
    @GingerFTW00 8 років тому +224

    But will it run Battlefield 4 at 60 fps?

    • @asj3419
      @asj3419 8 років тому +3

      If you want to spend more money than its worth

    • @shawnchong
      @shawnchong 7 років тому +30

      It'll run Battlefield vs. Call of Duty at 60 x 10^20 FPS.

    • @renansouza2373
      @renansouza2373 7 років тому +16

      no, it won't do this, quantum computers suck at most computable tasks, they are very goot at only a few tasks where superposition and entanglement are useful

    • @Leve2002
      @Leve2002 7 років тому +8

      But people will develop them to become amazing at gaming, and change the world of gaming as we know it :)

    • @thewewguy8t88
      @thewewguy8t88 7 років тому +3

      from what i understand you can actually take a picture of yourself and play yourself as you look in realtime in a battlefield game at 60fps a second.

  • @michalchik
    @michalchik 9 років тому +141

    I'll tell you why quantum computing WON'T change the world.
    Microsoft will write the OS that quantum computers will run and so they will be slow and crash prone.

    • @polraudiozion1156
      @polraudiozion1156 9 років тому +31

      And apple will make it into a facebook machine :P

    • @buffet_time
      @buffet_time 9 років тому +11

      Polraudio Zion and make it 5 times the price to double click google chrome

    • @OutlawMantis
      @OutlawMantis 9 років тому

      It's usually people who run Windows who write these jokes or find them funny. It just seems a bit defeatist! Gotta say though, I do like Maddox's opinions on Apple users: www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=macs_cant

    • @111vincento
      @111vincento 9 років тому

      The Blue Mantis LAAAAAAAAAAAAAWL this is golden

    • @polraudiozion1156
      @polraudiozion1156 9 років тому

      I took a MAC(Massive Ass Crap) earlier.

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time 9 років тому +12

    To have an objective understanding of quantum computers that fits in with the reality of our everyday life we would need an objective understanding of quantum mechanics itself.
    A quantum computer makes direct use of quantum mechanical phenomena, such as superposition and entanglement to perform operations. Instead of having Bits we have qubits or quantum bits that can be zero and one at the same time.
    There are a number of physical objects that can be used as a qubit like a single photon or an electron. Scientists have used the outer most electron of an atom as a qubit. It works because all electrons have magnetic fields they are like little bar magnets and this property is called spin. They have spin up and spin down just like a classical bit having 1 or 0. But the big differences is that they can have spin up or spin down at the same time and this is where the quantum computer gets its superior computing power from.
    There is no logical or classical explanation of why a single photon or electron can represent a quantum bit or qubit and therefore represent zero and one at the same time.
    This video will put forward the idea that we don't have a logical explanation of this because we don't have a complete understanding of the nature of 'time' as a physical process. The only explanation is that 'time' is an emergent property with the future continuously coming into existence photon by photon within a Universe of continuous creation. ua-cam.com/video/WmuLmfkkgZs/v-deo.html

    • @matthewq2365
      @matthewq2365 9 років тому +2

      Depending on the setup, I perceive a QM bit as a complex calculation pre defined in iteration. IE: so you calculated a universe, then you defined it as a Qubit. Threw iteration you can refine your model. Find new variances and even new hypothesis arise.
      The defining of the Q-bit threw spintronics, IMHO is where the fun begins. Matched pairs of Atoms bound in locked spin, when one is altered, the other outputs the same. My hangup is the FTL speed and identifying the time when the output changes. As we define the QM model threw examination we refine the equations yet to be defined.
      The model of 0,1,and 01 (superposition of both) Is just the beginning. Adding a QuBit, increases exponentially mathematically.

  • @SpikedSilver
    @SpikedSilver 8 років тому +5

    It will definitely change the world, and it will be the technology that self-learning AI will use to expand more rapidly than we can imagine.

  • @awesomo660
    @awesomo660 7 років тому +53

    But can it run crysis 3

    • @OmerFlame
      @OmerFlame 6 років тому

      not made to, and also quantum computers are running a very extraordinary type of a Linux Distro, and Crysis 3 cannot be downloaded to it. Plus, a quantum computer is running at megahertz speeds, so... Never.

    • @gnrtradepro
      @gnrtradepro 6 років тому

      No. However, it could calculate all possible outcomes of all possible encounters within Crysis.

  • @devinspurrill7376
    @devinspurrill7376 9 років тому +215

    Not gonna lie, did not understand most of this video. can you dumb it down please?

    • @7enSeUP
      @7enSeUP 9 років тому +8

      Computers more computered than the computers now, ex: Smartphones

    • @devinspurrill7376
      @devinspurrill7376 9 років тому +4

      Oskar Biniecki so for example it would be like asking somebody if they want pizza for supper, but they say yes, but mean no at the same time? sounds like a bad time. but, if it works better and advances computers, I will just remain ignorant and in awe. thanks

    • @sumandark8600
      @sumandark8600 9 років тому +28

      In terms of maths think of it like this, 8 bits of data in a regular computer can compute 8 individual pieces of information as instructions. 8 bits in a quantum computer however can compute 2^8 pieces of info, that's a grand total of 256 pieces of info and as the graph of 2^x is an exponential function you can imagine what that'd be like for even just 1 gibibyte.
      8 bits in a byte, 2^10 bytes in a kibibyte, 2^10 kibibytes in a mebibyte, 2^10 mebibytes in a gibibyte. That is 8*(2^10)^3 bits which is 8589934592 bits. For a quantum computer that'd be 2^8589934592 'bits' of information...and that is a massive number. The thing is that these processes need to be independent of each other to maximise efficiency so quantum computers are best suited to being used in parallel systems. :)

    • @devinspurrill7376
      @devinspurrill7376 9 років тому +12

      sumandark8600 Dear lord! it all makes sense now! thanks! so much computing power!!!

    • @Strav9
      @Strav9 9 років тому +1

      Devin Spurrill but apparently they can only maintain some information for a few seconds. They should put the computer in the antarctic

  • @notorious_tbageryt1115
    @notorious_tbageryt1115 7 років тому +13

    Everyone is time traveling right ? I remember typing this yesterday !

    • @crystaliz3dgreen
      @crystaliz3dgreen 4 роки тому

      yesterday? you mean last year right? what year is it again? I loose track some times...

    • @xusux
      @xusux 2 роки тому

      I am from 4 years after

  • @medorath8533
    @medorath8533 9 років тому +7

    i can't wait until they make Quantum gaming PC

  • @PenitentHollow
    @PenitentHollow 7 років тому +7

    this is a really dumbed down explanation of quantum computing. Just to touch on it, the cat also has a certain probability of being an elephant. We aren't just talking ones and zeros here, we're talking all possible, however improbable, outcomes.

  • @leedaq7767
    @leedaq7767 9 років тому +3

    so what is Quantum Computing again??

  • @Walterrinho
    @Walterrinho 9 років тому +1

    Yes! I wanted to see a video about this. And wouldn't quantum computing change encryption of data because it can decrypt it faster?

  • @oldfire3107
    @oldfire3107 6 років тому +1

    That background for the thumbnail of the video is my lock screen!!!!!

  • @TadiclsOperator
    @TadiclsOperator 7 років тому +5

    so i can be faster with my drop shot in cod?

  • @MurasakiBunny
    @MurasakiBunny 7 років тому +2

    In the future, when I look into my CPU tower, I'll find either a live or dead cat in it.

  • @rawstarmusic
    @rawstarmusic 9 років тому

    If we use it before we understand it computations can suggest actions that we don't understand. Do you want to execute: Yes/No?

  • @Mnogojazyk
    @Mnogojazyk 7 років тому +1

    I've been a medical librarian for over 25 years. I can think of a number of applications for quantum computing, especially in bioinformatics and modeling of biotic systems. But those are computational applications.
    I can think outside the box: quantum medicine. In this box, as it were, perhaps disease treatments could be developed on a quantum level instead of the current biochemical, materials, and budding bioinformatic levels. Perhaps not quantum computing, but applications of quantum physics. After all, quantum computing can't be the only application.

  • @VeggieBond
    @VeggieBond 9 років тому +4

    I'm just waiting for computers to take over.

  • @PhunkyMunky10
    @PhunkyMunky10 7 років тому +6

    Quantum Computers + A.I. = Skynet... We are FUCKED!!!

    • @rxonmymind8362
      @rxonmymind8362 6 років тому

      StonedPatriot
      No. Then we'll program an AI made by WOMEN. Hehe. Skynet will "leave" earth in a quantum second.
      Of course we who are left behind will forever be servants of a woman logic AI.... either way we are SCREWED.

  • @farqadmazhar1210
    @farqadmazhar1210 5 років тому

    Does it mean that we can directly apply the dft algorithm without uaing fft?

  • @AlkisGD
    @AlkisGD 6 років тому +1

    Schrödinger's thought experiment with the cat in the box was meant to mock the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. The thing is, under that interpretation, the Geiger counter in the box is the observer, not the scientist opening the box nor even the cat. You don't need a _conscious_ observer to collapse a wave function-that's Deepak Chopra quantum woo.

  • @lolobotius
    @lolobotius 9 років тому +47

    One thing I've noticed for sure that is how Crystal is beautiful and gorgeous.

    • @Adam-ox7zo
      @Adam-ox7zo 6 років тому +4

      Drama Queen finally someone who kindly complimented her. The amount of guys that have said things like "she's so beautiful. She only here for horny nerds." No she's here because she has a PhD and knows what she is talking about

    • @coiledsteel8344
      @coiledsteel8344 6 років тому

      Teringventje Porn Hub, Hamster, Anybunny, Back Page. Did I leave any others out?

    • @daksh416
      @daksh416 5 років тому

      People like you make School a pointless place to go

  • @dave5194
    @dave5194 9 років тому +4

    Eh, although quantum computing would be good for solving complex equations, simulations, and some pretty unhackable encryption, that's pretty much all it's good for, the computer won't necessarily be any faster than a classical computer.

  • @Beyonder1987
    @Beyonder1987 9 років тому

    I have just one question. Can a quantom computer run Crysis 4k 120fps?

  • @theamazinguniverse2098
    @theamazinguniverse2098 8 років тому

    thanks for the idea Dnews u gave me an idea for one of my science vids

  • @deetchy5311
    @deetchy5311 9 років тому +15

    I think we're all thinking the same thing here:
    Can it game?

    • @floofy_wolfe383
      @floofy_wolfe383 9 років тому +3

      Minecraft 8938K 420FPS

    • @1313hyme
      @1313hyme 9 років тому

      Would teleporting like Star Trek interest you? That's what Quantum communication/computing is based on. Who knows, you might be teleporting like the games ;)

    • @deetchy5311
      @deetchy5311 9 років тому

      Joel M Talk about hax.

    • @md-nv4rg
      @md-nv4rg 9 років тому

      AdrianThePlainGuy merp GTA V 69K 1337 Fps

  • @eddiepitts
    @eddiepitts 9 років тому +8

    Whoo Hoo so if it can actually send particles to the past them maybe in my lifetime my pc will be able to unsend my drunk text!

    • @Skinnymarks
      @Skinnymarks 9 років тому

      Quantum particles don't actually get transported back in time. They are defined in the presence and that collapse of the wave function affects all the other particles it interacted with. Making the information appear to go back in time and transmitted instantly to all the particles it had interacted with.

    • @eddiepitts
      @eddiepitts 9 років тому

      I know, I was just being an ass!

    • @willgoogletakethisname3963
      @willgoogletakethisname3963 9 років тому +1

      I read what skinnymarks said in sheldon's voice. It sounded like him.

  • @Babbolozada
    @Babbolozada Рік тому

    2:43 it's almost chilling, that's how big the first computers looked, and now look at how insanely small they are. The future is probably gonna be incredible.

  • @DejectedCat
    @DejectedCat 9 років тому

    So how many extra frame per second will it give me?

  •  8 років тому +229

    Cool, some hot chick talking about quantum physics.

    • @Hyumanity
      @Hyumanity 8 років тому +44

      Indeed, she appears to be a visually symmetrical, attractive, and knowledgeable female. Now, is her appeal due to my instinctual drive? It's just a face. I'm sure she has a beautiful mind though!

    • @eliaswrwf5826
      @eliaswrwf5826 7 років тому +21

      #BaconOfTheSea
      And ass, don't forget the asssssssssssssssssss

    • @blackcitadel37
      @blackcitadel37 7 років тому

      BaconOfTheRiver we know that you don't care about her mind in a first look, son. we don't either.

    • @blackcitadel37
      @blackcitadel37 7 років тому +5

      Not that hot, to be honest.

    • @homewardboundphotos
      @homewardboundphotos 6 років тому +7

      the fact that she's smart increases her hotness

  • @mickypure
    @mickypure 9 років тому +42

    Crystal is always hot in these videos.. 10/10

  • @pedrojrgarcia1979
    @pedrojrgarcia1979 7 років тому

    fo I was Ubering in Stanford CT, I was talking about the idea of QComputing, and he had told me that IBM had figured it out this was in march, 17, the scientist I guess came out that week and said that they had figured it out how to get it working. I guy seemed pretty intelligent. would love somebody who's pretty highly inteligent to check this out.

  • @xusux
    @xusux 2 роки тому

    Can it run with 2 tabs on chrome open??

  • @neeneko
    @neeneko 9 років тому +6

    Meh, quantum computing, while it has gotten a lot of media attention, is just one of multiple next-generation technologies researchers have been working on for decades. Sadly none have really panned out in an economic way, at least not so far.
    I suspect this will be a dead end, with a few niche applications but otherwise we will likely see improvements coming from manufacturing techniques rather than raw density. Think of it this way, a modern CPU fits on the head of a pin, but imagine taking that same density and having a cubic centimeter block of CPU instead. There are lots fo engineering problems in doing so, but there is a lot of room to work there.

    • @neeneko
      @neeneko 9 років тому

      ***** diminishing returns it hitting in terms of density, but we are new avenues are opening up in terms of volume. It is questionable if quantum computing will ever produce a more useful and economical device. Right now it appears that the best-case scenario might involve QC devices as some kind of coprocessor for specialized tasks.
      (edited to add)
      Ah interruptions. Something to keep in mind is that quantum computing is not intended to be a replacement for 'classical computing' in the first place, it can not be 'next generation', we are talking apples and oranges. QC is being developed for solving a limited set of specific problems, not general purpose computing, so the core of any system is still going to be a processor as we know them today. The longer term question will be, will dedicated QC devices ever be more economically useful than general purpose devices solving the same problems. History is full of technology that all things being equal could be 'better', but because of nice applications, mass produced general purpose devices dominate. Just look at disk vs tape today. Tape would be better IF the same engineering and manufacturing resources went into it, but disks keep jumping ahead due to scale. So tape lags to the point of being pointless for the majority of users. QC can aspire to be tape, but not disk.

    • @michaelarndt1231
      @michaelarndt1231 9 років тому

      ***** Just today I read an article on how germanium might be used again as a "next-gen" (it also was the "first-gen") material. So yes, silicone will be at the end of it's scale but that doesn't mean there wont be any progress with classical computing technology.
      Link to the article (it's in german): www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Chip-Material-Germanium-Zurueck-in-die-Zukunft-2516246.html

    • @pieluver1234
      @pieluver1234 9 років тому +1

      ***** It's hard to say whether quantum computing is the "next thing." It's definitely very good in specialized problems, but classical computers can compute most practical problems much faster with absolute accuracy (instead of probability like quantum computing). But yea, quantum tunneling is annoying.

    • @kevinclass2010
      @kevinclass2010 9 років тому

      Quantum computers can break encryption protocols such as ssl and tsl. This means the governments will tap on all electronic comunication easily

    • @joeblowme
      @joeblowme 9 років тому

      Kevin Lopez yea true, but then there will be quantum entangled networking which cant be sniffed(or in your words "tapped")

  • @HydroCannonGaming
    @HydroCannonGaming 9 років тому +19

    humans PLZ dont make artificial intellegince i dont wanna die becuz some idiot made a terminator

    • @davidkerr7
      @davidkerr7 8 років тому +4

      that is a misconception created by Hollywood and scifi.
      by the time we create a true self aware intelligence. we would have already mastered robotics and the human consciousness. So we would no be able distinguishing humans from machines. We would be able to transfer human consciousness into a machine body and AI onto an human body.
      not to mention human augmentation.
      Unless Ur terminator has a problem with ideas XD

    • @HydroCannonGaming
      @HydroCannonGaming 8 років тому +1

      David Kerr Thank you if eel safer now :D

    • @JJS-Gaming
      @JJS-Gaming 8 років тому +1

      +David Kerr Sorry but you're not correct here at all. We're not far off self-aware intelligence, that's why some of the brightest minds of our generation such as Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking have signed Anti-AI petitions. Technology is advancing at such a rate that is become dangerous to even research the possibilities of AI, resulting in United Nations AI ethics agreements. When we do ever create an artificial intelligence, it wouldn't need to take physical form to harm the way we live. Electrical grids, traffic lights, military uav's, smartphones and self-driving cars are all easy ways to destroy modern societies.

    • @HydroCannonGaming
      @HydroCannonGaming 8 років тому

      BananaJJS well... TIME TO KILL EVERYONE AS A PLAN 2

    • @TheLazyKey
      @TheLazyKey 8 років тому +2

      +HydroCannonGaming We have artificial intelligence. We do NOT, however, have artificial general intelligence or super intelligence.

  • @AliEl
    @AliEl 6 років тому

    do you think that we operate on a quantum level? explaining why we could feel when someone is thinking about us?

  • @colindavis5619
    @colindavis5619 6 років тому

    I had never heard of quanum computing. Is it better than quantum computing?

  • @adfssadfdsaf1
    @adfssadfdsaf1 9 років тому +7

    Will it make porn load faster

  • @broadcasttttable
    @broadcasttttable 6 років тому +1

    One thing I've learned over the years is that technology is about 10-15 years ahead of what we commoners are told via the controlled media. So safe to say quantum computers are already a reality in the "top secret" world. And if its true that qc's can make current encryption programs obsolete with a keystroke or two, it doesn't bode well for our "security," whether financial or otherwise.

  • @AbdulHadi-hs1uf
    @AbdulHadi-hs1uf 6 років тому

    Could you relate quantum mechanic with foods because it might be easy for me to understand better

  • @wcdeich4
    @wcdeich4 7 років тому +1

    Doesn't the D-Wave Quantum computer already exist?

  • @Metalpazallteway
    @Metalpazallteway 7 років тому

    Is this technology based or similar to that technology of the movie Source Code by any chance?

  • @JKVmanVideo
    @JKVmanVideo 9 років тому +1

    this is one of the best written and most articulate pieces I have found on DNews. Keep up the good work. More. Great example that you don't need to always clown around or talk down to the UA-cam community.

  • @matthewsmeets
    @matthewsmeets 9 років тому

    So quantum engtanglement, doesnt that mean that we could 'theoretically' transfer information fast and over long distances like between america and europe, if so do you know what i am thinking ;)

  • @kinggangar198
    @kinggangar198 7 років тому

    eerrmm interesting layout of quantum seems to be happening as we speak due to the reality of involvement within prototype test configuration

  • @bombuchu
    @bombuchu 9 років тому +1

    this would be awesome , with quantum computing we got layer processing which we can devices that can give us extremely vivid augmented vitural reality ala goggle glass

  • @Uiru11
    @Uiru11 7 років тому

    Will it make Internet Explorer usable?

  • @nAndy416
    @nAndy416 6 років тому

    Question: can you have a nueromorphic quantum computer? Anyone know?

  • @johnmartinez4740
    @johnmartinez4740 5 років тому

    What if you did the calculation in a black hole? Or does environment still come into play. Where is there zero environment? Is zero environment even possible?

  • @gnorf7210
    @gnorf7210 7 років тому +2

    Finally a computer that could run Total War games properly.

  • @davedogge2280
    @davedogge2280 5 років тому

    makes bugger all sense to me. 8 bits all the same particle in different universes, how do you perform a simple addition with another 8 bit word and grab the results ?

  • @aj74205
    @aj74205 9 років тому +2

    Crystal is so lovely and articulate and quantum computing is an exciting new frontier.

  • @cowboyhank456
    @cowboyhank456 9 років тому

    Intel once said they already had prototypes running on (or made of) something other than silicon, all they would say is that it was 'pretty cool'

  • @shintsu01
    @shintsu01 9 років тому

    so is it confirmed that D-wave 2 is or is not a quantum computer or is it still in a super position state ? :)

  • @1musichombre
    @1musichombre 4 роки тому

    Without going back to reread it, I would say John Naisbit predicted the probability of this type of outcome in his book "Global Paradox" so go take a look at that and see if it collapses your wave function :)

  • @manishsubbu216
    @manishsubbu216 3 роки тому

    anyone just say me that
    did QUANTUM COMPUTING have invented or still research is going on.
    if not then how to start my research and what subject i should keep in my hand for this research.
    I just completed class 12.
    plzz replyyyyyyyyyyyyy dear future inventors.

  • @pcrengnr1
    @pcrengnr1 6 років тому

    IBM now offers Free Time on their 5 Qubit computer. It is programmable by the user. Really cool. When we get multi-Meg Qubits the computing world will certainly change.

  • @chillslime11
    @chillslime11 8 років тому +2

    You literally did not mention any real practical benefits of quantum computers for normal everyday people despite the title of this video.

  • @Jenovasreunion
    @Jenovasreunion 9 років тому

    do more on this, please. :)

  • @Ostnizdasht206
    @Ostnizdasht206 9 років тому

    So.. how will this change internet pron?

  • @fortythirty
    @fortythirty 9 років тому

    What's the name of the song in the background?

  • @vjorp5332
    @vjorp5332 9 років тому

    Would it work for gaming?

  • @nmagko
    @nmagko 6 років тому

    Quantum computing is not a replacement of normal/classical computing, it just apply for some limited and specific type of problems so you cannot compare if it is faster than other because it isn't.

  • @PauloAndreAzevedoQuirino
    @PauloAndreAzevedoQuirino 9 років тому

    Now that's real multi-threading!

  • @NiramBG
    @NiramBG 9 років тому +1

    I'm looking forward for quantum computing to make a VR as real as the real world! Oh, the possibilities for video games that could be possible is just to much for my emotions to handle!

  • @TesserLink
    @TesserLink 9 років тому

    hope these types of computers will be able to do iray in real time gaming to bring the graphics of gaming to the next level

  • @YunProductionCanada
    @YunProductionCanada 9 років тому

    You didn't adressed the main resoning of the computer. Quantum computer is essentially, able to deal with 4 states of numbers, instead of just 0 and 1. It enables much efficient and large calculation that is significant enough to ditch the old ways.

  • @Sugardaddy501
    @Sugardaddy501 9 років тому

    Depends on the places it is applied to.

  • @Infinit3Enigma
    @Infinit3Enigma 9 років тому

    Interesting and very potent system if possible. Likelihood is not looking good unless we think outside of the box. How can you isolate an event from the "outside world" while maintaining a control of the event using methods that can be effected by other events on the "outside world"? Hmm

  • @tramsgar
    @tramsgar 9 років тому

    Try an inversed warp shell.

  • @ArmoredAnubis
    @ArmoredAnubis 9 років тому

    D news is good again! Yay

  • @finkelzo
    @finkelzo 9 років тому

    What is that music in the background?

  • @deltajegga
    @deltajegga 9 років тому

    so its like the Infinite Improbability Drive?

  • @ethanholloway5914
    @ethanholloway5914 8 років тому

    there's already a quantum computer out there that you can get if you have a lot of money to spend, it's the D-wave quantum computer from Vancouver

  • @arisu7397
    @arisu7397 6 років тому

    But can it run battlefield 10 at 3fps?

  • @liam3813
    @liam3813 6 років тому

    couldn‘t concentrate myself.. thx crystal

  • @joshadamik2932
    @joshadamik2932 9 років тому

    playing video games on that would be epic :D

  • @ReasonablyFit
    @ReasonablyFit 4 роки тому

    Wow... That's impressive. Can you repeat that?

  • @kcunit333
    @kcunit333 9 років тому

    Finally tech that i might be able to run crises on max setting (y)

  • @knifefest
    @knifefest 9 років тому

    1:14 The point of Schrodinger's Cat was not to prove a cat can be both alive and dead at the same time based on a quanta's superposition, but that quantum mechanics and Newtonian physics do not mesh that cleanly.

  • @odstar21
    @odstar21 6 років тому

    Make a better firewall extension for our browsers please with Quantum Computing :}

  • @thewewguy8t88
    @thewewguy8t88 7 років тому

    so some posiblies i can see are in video games for example just take a picture and record your voice of yourself and you can play yourself inside the video game.

  • @CabhanListis
    @CabhanListis 9 років тому +2

    Quantum computing will cause a divergence in the way we refer to computer power. Conventional computers, like the one you're using now, has power that is measured in terms of speed, basically how fast you can get a piece of something from point A to point B. A quantum computer WILL NOT necessarily be faster than that conventional computer in that way. What a QC will do is a whole lot more of those operations at once. Instead of one piece from A to B, it will get a HUGE number of those pieces at about the same speed. And I do mean huge. There was a paper published a while back where a professor worked out that a QC with as few as 30 qubits could match a conventional computer the size of the observable universe. But it's not going to play GTA V or Quake faster than your souped up gaming rig as strictly a QC. That kind of environment will run like molasses.

    • @cedvdb6473
      @cedvdb6473 8 років тому

      +Cabhan Listis well you could have the best of both world then.

  • @moosefactory133
    @moosefactory133 8 років тому +1

    With quantum computing you will be able to get video graphics in real time while playing a computer game that are as good as the graphics you see in computer generated movies on the big screen

  • @unbreakableyin2522
    @unbreakableyin2522 9 років тому

    Kind of like that movie Splice.. where the scientists practice possible outcomes on the genetically modified genome..

  • @Kjones520
    @Kjones520 9 років тому

    I honestly did not know that.

  • @izagury
    @izagury 9 років тому

    Please make a video on biological computing :)

  • @TheJaredtheJaredlong
    @TheJaredtheJaredlong 9 років тому

    I've heard that quantum computers actually run slower than our current computers. It's like the difference between a regular car and dump truck: the car can go faster than the dump truck, but the dump truck can accomplish more heavy work; quantum computers are an advancement in computing power, but not computing speed, so I doubt they'll ever be too appealing to the commercial market.

  • @soulextracter
    @soulextracter 9 років тому +1

    There is already a quantum computer! It's called D:WAVE
    Look it up

  • @harrynewton4786
    @harrynewton4786 9 років тому

    For all us programmers out there, would our coding languages change a lot if we transition to quantum computers?, I dunno just interested to see, such as java,c++ etc

    • @harrynewton4786
      @harrynewton4786 9 років тому

      Never mind just read the d-wave PDF programming showing examples is c

  • @ramalingeswararaobhavaraju5813
    @ramalingeswararaobhavaraju5813 4 роки тому

    Good afternoon Seeker sir, good afternoon Crystal Dilworth madam, and thank you so much for your good information.

  • @Aboode007
    @Aboode007 9 років тому

    Is it just me or the intro's question was exactly my question before I started this video?

  • @devrathnasekara8591
    @devrathnasekara8591 6 років тому

    Great work

  • @atlehman69
    @atlehman69 9 років тому

    If all the matter, energy, and space was eventually converted into one perfect quantum computer, that made use of every elementary particle and unit of energy that exists, would reality be the computer in the universe, or the universe created within the computer?

  • @billlewis3203
    @billlewis3203 7 років тому +1

    I'm surprised the name "D-Wave" didn't come up.

  • @WinterCrafter
    @WinterCrafter 9 років тому

    When these come to shops you can say good bye to lag in video games.

  • @vectoronic
    @vectoronic 9 років тому

    can it run crysis?