Matty K, always my source for LRC update news!! This is great, but I'm almost more interested in the improvements the "Lens Blur" function! Hopefully it's faster, and the ability to add in bulk could be great.
I'm glad they included this now in LR because that was probably one of the few remaining things I would have to send to PS, and the annoying thing for me was that after doing spot removal in PS (or anything in PS) it would have to send back a TIF and basically your edits to that point, were baked into the image and you could continue to re-adjust again, further, but the initial edits that were sent over to PS are part of the resulting TIFF so this is a bit of a game changer and allows us to further keep more of a non-destructive workflow and merges more of the PS features into LR, thus further making LR/LRC more of a one-stop-shop photo editing tool. I'm sure there are instances where PS is still needed for some things, but I do have to say that I"m impressed with how much they have improved LR/LRC over the past 3-4 years.
Great video. I'm curious to know how well this feature handles higher resolution images though. Part of the issue with the PS version of Generative Fill is that it tends to look blurry on high-res files if you're trying to fill a larger area.
Since the Adobe AI generates differently everytime, I think they should offer a vegas mode where one of the results suddenly says "Here's your code for one free month!" . I could see it encouraging a lot of people to keep trying the different results.
I used this remove tool today for the first time. It's better than the spot removal tool was, but (as you said) not as good as Photoshop's remove tool. I'll keep playing with it.
Does the quality of the image Generative Fill improve though? If not, is there a workaround to add, let's say, a grain effect within the selected mask to complement the original photo's grain/noise surroundings?
Thanks, Matt. Very helpful as always. I'd forgotten about the Lightroom Summit, and I see that it's already started. Does the summit include the latest May 2024 feature updates just released?
Finally!! Now I don't have to switch between Lightroom and Photoshop to edit. Definitely will save time and ram space, so I don't have to keep both programs open.
As I still work with my version of CS6 and can only afford one monthly rental which would you say is best to go with LR or Photoshop... whichever will be a big learning curve for the senior lady lol
Hi. It’s actually more expensive to get either one separately. If you get the Photography Plan at $10 a month it includes Lightroom and Photoshop so you don’t have to choose which one. There is no cheaper plan so you’re in luck in that you don’t have to choose.
Hi. There are no settings or choices for this. It just happens as part of the process and if something doesn’t work then you’d have to contact Adobe for support as something is wrong. Good luck.
You have won the "Best (and most useless) Comment Ever" award. Thank you for giving me ridiculous comments to share with my friends. You just can't make stuff this dumb up, so I'm not even going to remove it. I really appreciate it.
As always, your very clear examples made for a great intro to these new tools. Thank you Matt!
Outstanding! Thank you for this!
Matty K, always my source for LRC update news!! This is great, but I'm almost more interested in the improvements the "Lens Blur" function! Hopefully it's faster, and the ability to add in bulk could be great.
Thanks for the lesson.
As always, be lucky stay safe.
Thank you, great update. 👍👏
I'm glad they included this now in LR because that was probably one of the few remaining things I would have to send to PS, and the annoying thing for me was that after doing spot removal in PS (or anything in PS) it would have to send back a TIF and basically your edits to that point, were baked into the image and you could continue to re-adjust again, further, but the initial edits that were sent over to PS are part of the resulting TIFF so this is a bit of a game changer and allows us to further keep more of a non-destructive workflow and merges more of the PS features into LR, thus further making LR/LRC more of a one-stop-shop photo editing tool. I'm sure there are instances where PS is still needed for some things, but I do have to say that I"m impressed with how much they have improved LR/LRC over the past 3-4 years.
Great video. I'm curious to know how well this feature handles higher resolution images though. Part of the issue with the PS version of Generative Fill is that it tends to look blurry on high-res files if you're trying to fill a larger area.
Thanks for posting.
Thanks!!!!
Since the Adobe AI generates differently everytime, I think they should offer a vegas mode where one of the results suddenly says "Here's your code for one free month!" . I could see it encouraging a lot of people to keep trying the different results.
Is the resolution of the generative filled part of the image the same as rest of photo?
What are the limitations? Photoshop has the issue of rendering a low resolution fill.
I used this remove tool today for the first time. It's better than the spot removal tool was, but (as you said) not as good as Photoshop's remove tool. I'll keep playing with it.
Is there a resolution limit to how big an area can be removed, say like the 1024x1024 resolution limit in AI Generative Fill?
Does the quality of the image Generative Fill improve though? If not, is there a workaround to add, let's say, a grain effect within the selected mask to complement the original photo's grain/noise surroundings?
Thanks for this info Matt-and for the great response to a terrible comment. It's one thing to be a thief, but then to be an entitled thief-oh my
Yeah, it's not perfectly, but it will save time in some small applications I reckon.
It'll get better in the future imo
Thanks Matt 🙏
Thanks, Matt. Very helpful as always. I'd forgotten about the Lightroom Summit, and I see that it's already started. Does the summit include the latest May 2024 feature updates just released?
Yep!
Everything seems to be more user-friendly. It works better when it’s actually in Photoshop I find it more cumbersome in light room
Definitely… Pixel based editor vs an instruction-based one.
Finally!! Now I don't have to switch between Lightroom and Photoshop to edit. Definitely will save time and ram space, so I don't have to keep both programs open.
As I still work with my version of CS6 and can only afford one monthly rental which would you say is best to go with LR or Photoshop... whichever will be a big learning curve for the senior lady lol
Hi. It’s actually more expensive to get either one separately. If you get the Photography Plan at $10 a month it includes Lightroom and Photoshop so you don’t have to choose which one. There is no cheaper plan so you’re in luck in that you don’t have to choose.
Will there be a limit to how many times this can be used each month before it slows down and you are asked to pay extra for its use? Thanks
No!
Not yet
Is this still a low resolution fill?
it's really useless in most situations. I had no success and reverted to helping and object brushes. it's just a gimmick.
Lightroom got the Remove Tool.
may be you could show how to updated your lightroom catalogue from old version because when you do auto update the AI feature doesn't work
Hi. There are no settings or choices for this. It just happens as part of the process and if something doesn’t work then you’d have to contact Adobe for support as something is wrong. Good luck.
I personally like PS better, seems to work better than LR
I don’t think anyone would disagree with you.
@@MattKloskowski I wouldn’t bet on that 😂😂😂
It looks like the masking is gonna be a pain in the rear... might as well just open the file in Ps.
Thanks…until it’s refined, I’ll wait.
Kinda useless unfortunately cause it won't be available offline for the people who pirates lightroom (basically everyone since its adobe)
You have won the "Best (and most useless) Comment Ever" award. Thank you for giving me ridiculous comments to share with my friends. You just can't make stuff this dumb up, so I'm not even going to remove it. I really appreciate it.
😂
@@MattKloskowski thank you! Please keep paying that trash company so we can keep getting their product for free
Keep ‘em coming! A thief and an entitled thief all in one! These comments are gold! 😂
LoRes only at the moment 😢