Bro, game uses ue5 software lumen even when rt is off. You cannot completely get rid of raytracing. If there would be no raytracing it would perform better. Look at how amd gpus run this game. You can ask modern devs why they are not optimizing games for 300 fps at all times
@@ArchieBunker11 Can you give an example of a game from 2017-2019 that the GTX 1080TI plays at such low framerates at effective 1080p dumbed down settings (I think timewise, that is a fair comparison)?
@@konstantinlozev2272 can you give me an example of a game in 2019 running on the 1080ti using graphics rendering tech that was though to be impossible to run? Or are you deliberately forgetting that part of the equation?
@@ArchieBunker11 Literally all features of DX 12 that did not exist in DX11. Same for DX11 Vs DX 10. Also, let's not forget that the RTX 4080 is a USD 1k GPU of a third generation in a row that purports to run raytracing.
The graphics look amazing, but I can't help but feel like games are becoming entirely too demanding, especially with the issue of UE5. Getting 30-40fps on any game at native resolution with a 4080 Super is insane. We might start seeing diminishing returns as games start to look lifelike, as we get 20 fps with high end GPUs. Just my opinion though
You are absolutely right. This game is well optimized but still has some UE5 stutter and textures popping in and out on occasion. I'm having a great time with it but wish it was smoother. I'm playing 4k with a 4090/7800x3D combo. Maybe 1440p is the way to go.
Games can look incredible without having to go for full realism, in fact, I think games with a great artstyle and great gamedesign always look better than any hyperrealistic game that's coming out. This realism is pretty boring imo, no creativity, nothing new, just unnecessarily demanding.
@@mr.t3782 I'm playing 4K using HB optimized setting (rt performance, 50% DLSS) with a 4080/5800x combo. I just beat tiger vanguard and I'm getting 50-65 fps.
1440p native with "optimized" settings barely 70? I expected more than that with my 6800XT, and this a freaking 4080S. People can say whatever they want this is optimized like shit.
Literally just got myself a prebuilt with 4080super Good thing I don’t care about 4k But moving up to 1440p from 1080p doesn’t sound appealing anymore😅
Playing this game at 200fps feels damn good. I turned down the ray tracing, the game looks good without it. 4090 3440x1440 Quality preset Full ray tracing off High graphic settings Framegen on =200 fps lol
I'm happy with 1440p, cinematic preset, dlss res at 85,rt at very high, frame gen on and get 90-100fps. Don't feel sluggish at all, even the few times it drops at 85. It looks so good and it deserves to be played at max settings. Great game!
No need more if you have never play with a montiro in 4k Really 1440p gîves anyway a excellent quality of picture I will go to à 27 1440p oled a good balance with fps and image quality
With RT looks like a new game, so much better. Next gen games will look nice. 4070Ti should max it with frame gen, doesn't seem more demanding than alan wake.
For 1440P, all cinematic and very high ray tracing with DLSS Quality and FG ON and you're getting it all. PS: DLSS slider doesnt work. Only categories work. Try 89% when Quality kicks in and 66%, same performance!
Love the videos Krispy! I have a regular rtx 4080.. do you recommend quality dlss or dlaa at 4k with frame generation? No ray tracing cause of the damn stutters
I’m getting 140-160 so far on my 7900xtx with HUB optimized Quality settings 1440p 100% render and FSR Frame Gen. solid game so far too. That wandering guy is a pain in the ass though. I beat both of the wolves and left him to come back to lmao
@@mmremugamesmm Hardware Unboxed made a video that came out yesterday where they showed what settings worked the best for graphical quality and performance uplift. Some of the settings don’t give much detail at cinematic that’s worth keeping them so high. So turning down key settings to high can give back a lot of FPS without hurting the overall image
@@silverwerewolf975 that’s how I feel because that’s actually where your hardware is and it’s really sad that all these new graphics cards are struggling
I'm playing the game with fullRT and my fps are smooth as butter on the RTX4080S. At 4K DLSS performance + FG, very high settings, fullRT I get 85fps in the built-in benchmark, and 70-110fps during gameplay (performance can dip to around 72-75fps during the boss fight in the water and even then game is playable). At 1440p DLSS Quality + FG I even get higher framerate 115fps, but I get much better image quality when I downscale (DLDSR2.25x) 4K to my 1440p monitor, therefore I prefer to run the game at 4K. I used to see some traversal stutters from time to time (nothing game breaking), but now I don't see them anymore at all (maybe the latest patch or windows update fixed it). The game is a joy to play and it looks stunning in full RT. Of course, I use FG to get perfectly smooth experience, but since DLSS FG works so well, I don't really care. This particular game is more responsive with FG on (48ms with FG on, 60ms without at 67fps base).
For some reason, I can't get your smooth performance. I have a 4080S and an I714000k and I get MASSIVE frame spikes ranging from 110 all the way down to 70. sometimes drastically dropping performance mid combat. I don't really understand what I'm doing wrong here. 1440p DLSS 50, RT medium, and I am on very high settings. Frustrating when I have a 2800 dollar rig and 800 dollar monitor and I can't even get a smooth experience. ANY help would be greatly appreciated.
I'm not sure how I feel about low frames on Cinematic. Black Desert Online is 9 years old and has 4K Remastered, Cinematic as well. I can't get 60 in that either. The goal is cinematic and they tell you time and time again, it's not for playing. I messed with the Benchmark in this and I had no issue getting playable frame rates with 4K Very High. I tried 1440 and 4K and it's a UE5 thing. I don't see a difference. I run a 7900XTX but outside RT scenarios, I don't see a difference between a 4080 Super and a 7900XTX. They trade half a dozen frames game to game.
Hey Kryzzpo! Love your 4080 Super videos. I own one too. I have a 13700k and 4080 Super. I only get between 85%-97% GPU utilization. Is it because I am running DDR4 ram? This is with most games not just Wukong. Thanks
Hello, been watching your videos lately since im planning on buying a new pc but I really cant decide if I should wait for the 5080 or go with the 4080S, since my budget isnt infinite (around 2500euros), and I'm asking this because I want to have the PC connected to a 4K Tv to use it like a "console" for single player games and have it connected to a monitor for when I want to play competitive. what would you and the community recommend? (ps: PLAN TO KEEP THE PC INTACT FOR 5-7 YEARS LIKE MY CURRENT 1080 BUILD)
The difference between Full RT medium and the game's Cinematic settings is small in terms of performance (on NVIDIA GPU's). So you can see the whole software RT approach with Lumen kind of doesn't really work well for people with NVIDIA cards. Only thing i think that the cinematic reflection setting looks better than Full RT at medium. But the shadows are soooo much better, that i am willing to sacrifice a bit of this reflection clarity. And probably reflections are still more realistic at RT medium, just not so pretty.
Ive got the 4070ti super and its amazing in any game i throw at it i wont think of upgrading for a long time either when the 5080 super releases years from now or when the 6080 releases if im still happy with the performance by then
The recommended specs for ray tracing at ultra according to the creators is 4k at high with the 4080 super and dlss 50% I’m playing that way and it works more than fine
I asked this before on your last video but are you going to Benchmark Final Fantasy 16 PC Demo? This game has high requirement so really curious as to how good or how poorly it runs on below minimum GPUs!
Thx for the video. It's crazy, but the hair quality in ultra or cinematic makes the flicker shadows. This could be a bug. I tested it with the RTX 4090 in 4K.
It's really, really fun. The graphics are (of course) great, the combat is fun, and the cutscenes are amazing. If there's one downside, it's that it can be a bit difficult to find your way around.
@@Atzmn are you actually serious or fanboying much ? The technical mess at launch, over promising, under delivering, choices that don’t really matter, broken mechanics and etc I’m not saying the game is bad In fact I’m playing it rn But it was the definition of overhype
It was absolutely not the 4070's fault. anyway i play 4070 on 27 1440p monitor dlss performance frame gen on optimized/quality with ray tracing very high 80/100 frames (1440p dlss performance = 1080p dlss quality)
If I had a 4090, I would use RT, but I have a 4080s, I didn't really have any problems playing without RT. I couldn't really feel anything other than the shadows getting darker. And the difference between DLSS quality and performance isn't noticeable at 4k.
I'm with you on that. I also have 4080S and have 0 interest in RT. Bought this gpu to be able to play at 4K thanks to the DLSS. 4K HUB Quality preset + dlss quality + frame gen. Solid 100fps with high resolution and graphical settings is much more preferable to me than some unneccessary lights that take %50 of my fps.
@@Wodagazowana5000 it's pretty good. The only thing is matter is how devs integrate FG into game. Because sometimes it's great, sometimes it should be turned on only in the case of emergency. In BM:W it's like normal, idk
looks like optimization is a mess.. yes its UE5 but this is too much... RX5700XT and RTX 2060 is recommended.. can they even run 1080p medium setting in 60fps.. EDIT: just checked.. nop they can not 5700XT 1080p medium is 50+fps... GPU that is recommended should run very high setting in 1080p 60fps
Is it worth disabling some cores to match the 7800x3d if I have a 7900x3d? I see him do this in every video and I’m curious how he does it and how much of a difference it can be with a 7900x3d
Is it normal that Frame Generation (I have a 7900 XTX) ignores the frame cap ? The FPS sometimes go over 144 which causes screen tearing on my 4K 144Hz monitor.
@@zWORMzGaming No. No it's not. True actual performance tests that are scoring a native rasterized resolution rendering do not include the use of any artificial intelligence processed spatial anti-aliasing. Even some recent titles don't even include DLAA while others force it. Native is native. Any AI software used will make it no longer native. DLAA is the same as DLSS but uses native resolution alone rather than including a additional upscale process. DLAA most definitely will change the actual image/performance on a native rendered resolution. Or why would it exist? DLAA algorithm does improve image quality and sometimes at a slight performance hit. It's a AI powered software solution that alters the image before the image is sent to the display. Not native. Native has no other help.... Ever. You're wrong.
@@zWORMzGaming MEU HERÓI FALOU COMIGO!1! Well yes but at performance DLSS you were hitting 110-120, that should be better no? Or was the graphic quality too reduced for you?
watching from my monitor on 1440p youtube and monitor 1440p but why youtube always look bad quality i mean when u pl;ay this on your own monitor and pc it will blow your mind the graphics and quality right?
I dont get it, i have a 4080 super + ryzen 5 7600x and play this game at 1440p with cinematic settings + raytracing on medium I get around 120 fps max and 90 minimum...how is this bad?
Black myth : wukong minimum requirement : ryzen 4070
Zach what have you started 😭
For 1440p ? Yeah 😢
@@purabisaha1963720p*
Don't insult Ryzen 4070 like that. That thing can even play 8K native with no problem.
forsen was up to something with that RTX4080 for 1080p resolution thing. Hes never wrong...
Me staring at my 4060 : why can't you be like your older brother
Coz that ain't fed with enough dollars
Cause you’re a terrible parent
4060/4060 Ti: You guys always act like you're better than me!
4070, 4070 Super, 4070 Ti Super, 4080 Super, 4090: 🤨🤨?
It has nearly half the cuda cores and nearly half the memory bandwidth (at more than half the price) compared to the 4070.
Your first mistake was buying a 4060 lol
Just perfect! Effective 1440p with dumbed down settings on a USD 1k GPU!
Its $1000 competitor gets half the framerate, and this is running settings people thought were impossible a few years ago. Whats the problem?
Bro, game uses ue5 software lumen even when rt is off. You cannot completely get rid of raytracing. If there would be no raytracing it would perform better. Look at how amd gpus run this game. You can ask modern devs why they are not optimizing games for 300 fps at all times
@@ArchieBunker11 Can you give an example of a game from 2017-2019 that the GTX 1080TI plays at such low framerates at effective 1080p dumbed down settings (I think timewise, that is a fair comparison)?
@@konstantinlozev2272 can you give me an example of a game in 2019 running on the 1080ti using graphics rendering tech that was though to be impossible to run? Or are you deliberately forgetting that part of the equation?
@@ArchieBunker11 Literally all features of DX 12 that did not exist in DX11. Same for DX11 Vs DX 10.
Also, let's not forget that the RTX 4080 is a USD 1k GPU of a third generation in a row that purports to run raytracing.
The graphics look amazing, but I can't help but feel like games are becoming entirely too demanding, especially with the issue of UE5. Getting 30-40fps on any game at native resolution with a 4080 Super is insane. We might start seeing diminishing returns as games start to look lifelike, as we get 20 fps with high end GPUs. Just my opinion though
You are absolutely right. This game is well optimized but still has some UE5 stutter and textures popping in and out on occasion. I'm having a great time with it but wish it was smoother. I'm playing 4k with a 4090/7800x3D combo. Maybe 1440p is the way to go.
Games can look incredible without having to go for full realism, in fact, I think games with a great artstyle and great gamedesign always look better than any hyperrealistic game that's coming out. This realism is pretty boring imo, no creativity, nothing new, just unnecessarily demanding.
@@mr.t3782 I'm playing 4K using HB optimized setting (rt performance, 50% DLSS) with a 4080/5800x combo. I just beat tiger vanguard and I'm getting 50-65 fps.
Not using FG BTW.
Devs are going console way. Slowly trying to enforce 30fps as new normal
1440p native with "optimized" settings barely 70?
I expected more than that with my 6800XT, and this a freaking 4080S. People can say whatever they want this is optimized like shit.
Yes,shit 💀
Literally haha
That XT would RIP with RT on. 😮
@@ehenningsen he was using rt off on that chart and that is was i meant
I dont care about rt
@@silverwerewolf975 of course. I was being goofy.
Here lies: the 4080 super tried to run black myth wukong at 1440p max settings with raytracing
zWORMz Gaming, nice video I really liked it
Thank you 😃
@@zWORMzGamingplease test i3 n305
damn i just finished the 4070 one and this pops up immediately
Same
Over 1k and cant get 60fps without ray tracing. Yikes
Comment may wrongly suggest that GPU is inadequate while it's the game developers that lack skills to optimize their game.
@@StarFury2 It's a Nvidia sponsored title. How can we enirely blame the developers.
@@StarFury2 you’re not a developer, so don’t say things you don’t understand.
You realize that Wukong uses Lumen right? that's... ray tracing also.
@@breadone_ I'm a C++ dev, and I can confirm that you have no idea what you're spouting now.
Literally just got myself a prebuilt with 4080super
Good thing I don’t care about 4k
But moving up to 1440p from 1080p doesn’t sound appealing anymore😅
Playing this game at 200fps feels damn good.
I turned down the ray tracing, the game looks good without it.
4090
3440x1440
Quality preset
Full ray tracing off
High graphic settings
Framegen on
=200 fps lol
My man is on the Black Myth Wukong grind 😂❤
I'm happy with 1440p, cinematic preset, dlss res at 85,rt at very high, frame gen on and get 90-100fps. Don't feel sluggish at all, even the few times it drops at 85. It looks so good and it deserves to be played at max settings. Great game!
No need more if you have never play with a montiro in 4k
Really 1440p gîves anyway a excellent quality of picture
I will go to à 27 1440p oled a good balance with fps and image quality
Legends with integrated graphics 🗿
Rtx 4080s "its playable its not terrible experience" 😂
Its running settings people thought were impossible a few years ago.
It’s this game not the card
With RT looks like a new game, so much better. Next gen games will look nice.
4070Ti should max it with frame gen, doesn't seem more demanding than alan wake.
Please protect this guy at all costs. This is thebonly channel I will go to for benchmarks. Well done Krispy creme
We really need the 50 series soon so we can max out current games
RTX 5090 I'll bet will be the first ever stable 8K 60 FPS gaming experience on the market! The RTX TITAN AI, much moreso!
For 1440P, all cinematic and very high ray tracing with DLSS Quality and FG ON and you're getting it all. PS: DLSS slider doesnt work. Only categories work. Try 89% when Quality kicks in and 66%, same performance!
Love the videos Krispy! I have a regular rtx 4080.. do you recommend quality dlss or dlaa at 4k with frame generation? No ray tracing cause of the damn stutters
Can u test out Doom 2 RTX?
I’m getting 140-160 so far on my 7900xtx with HUB optimized Quality settings 1440p 100% render and FSR Frame Gen. solid game so far too. That wandering guy is a pain in the ass though. I beat both of the wolves and left him to come back to lmao
What is this HUB you are talking about. I’ve seen others mention it.
@@mmremugamesmm Hardware Unboxed made a video that came out yesterday where they showed what settings worked the best for graphical quality and performance uplift. Some of the settings don’t give much detail at cinematic that’s worth keeping them so high. So turning down key settings to high can give back a lot of FPS without hurting the overall image
@@MotoMedicine904 ok thank you, I’ll check it out
And the real fps? No one cares about fake frames, you can measure that
@@silverwerewolf975 that’s how I feel because that’s actually where your hardware is and it’s really sad that all these new graphics cards are struggling
I'm playing the game with fullRT and my fps are smooth as butter on the RTX4080S. At 4K DLSS performance + FG, very high settings, fullRT I get 85fps in the built-in benchmark, and 70-110fps during gameplay (performance can dip to around 72-75fps during the boss fight in the water and even then game is playable). At 1440p DLSS Quality + FG I even get higher framerate 115fps, but I get much better image quality when I downscale (DLDSR2.25x) 4K to my 1440p monitor, therefore I prefer to run the game at 4K.
I used to see some traversal stutters from time to time (nothing game breaking), but now I don't see them anymore at all (maybe the latest patch or windows update fixed it). The game is a joy to play and it looks stunning in full RT. Of course, I use FG to get perfectly smooth experience, but since DLSS FG works so well, I don't really care. This particular game is more responsive with FG on (48ms with FG on, 60ms without at 67fps base).
Can't wait to max out the game in 4 years on my 6090 for 4200$
For some reason, I can't get your smooth performance. I have a 4080S and an I714000k and I get MASSIVE frame spikes ranging from 110 all the way down to 70. sometimes drastically dropping performance mid combat. I don't really understand what I'm doing wrong here. 1440p DLSS 50, RT medium, and I am on very high settings. Frustrating when I have a 2800 dollar rig and 800 dollar monitor and I can't even get a smooth experience. ANY help would be greatly appreciated.
I'm not sure how I feel about low frames on Cinematic. Black Desert Online is 9 years old and has 4K Remastered, Cinematic as well. I can't get 60 in that either. The goal is cinematic and they tell you time and time again, it's not for playing.
I messed with the Benchmark in this and I had no issue getting playable frame rates with 4K Very High. I tried 1440 and 4K and it's a UE5 thing. I don't see a difference. I run a 7900XTX but outside RT scenarios, I don't see a difference between a 4080 Super and a 7900XTX. They trade half a dozen frames game to game.
I guess Nvidia got to give us a reason to buy the 50 series
Kryzzp‘s PC after installing three different GPU’s within 10 hours: 🤰
Hey Kryzzpo!
Love your 4080 Super videos. I own one too. I have a 13700k and 4080 Super. I only get between 85%-97% GPU utilization. Is it because I am running DDR4 ram? This is with most games not just Wukong.
Thanks
Hello, been watching your videos lately since im planning on buying a new pc but I really cant decide if I should wait for the 5080 or go with the 4080S, since my budget isnt infinite (around 2500euros), and I'm asking this because I want to have the PC connected to a 4K Tv to use it like a "console" for single player games and have it connected to a monitor for when I want to play competitive. what would you and the community recommend? (ps: PLAN TO KEEP THE PC INTACT FOR 5-7 YEARS LIKE MY CURRENT 1080 BUILD)
ill get this one when it's on sale and with all new updates for a even better experience😂
What overlay are you using? Looks so nice.
MSI afterburner and RTSS :)
Here's my video on it:
ua-cam.com/video/GgTGmfwwn9s/v-deo.html
The difference between Full RT medium and the game's Cinematic settings is small in terms of performance (on NVIDIA GPU's).
So you can see the whole software RT approach with Lumen kind of doesn't really work well for people with NVIDIA cards.
Only thing i think that the cinematic reflection setting looks better than Full RT at medium.
But the shadows are soooo much better, that i am willing to sacrifice a bit of this reflection clarity.
And probably reflections are still more realistic at RT medium, just not so pretty.
Ive got the 4070ti super and its amazing in any game i throw at it i wont think of upgrading for a long time either when the 5080 super releases years from now or when the 6080 releases if im still happy with the performance by then
The recommended specs for ray tracing at ultra according to the creators is 4k at high with the 4080 super and dlss 50% I’m playing that way and it works more than fine
What is the app used for the stats? RTSS or something else? If it's RTSS, what are the settings?
Came from the gt 1030 one, oh god this gpu is fast😱😱😱
I asked this before on your last video but are you going to Benchmark Final Fantasy 16 PC Demo? This game has high requirement so really curious as to how good or how poorly it runs on below minimum GPUs!
It crawls with every gpu... A literal stutter fest but you can try it for yourself if you want its a free demo
Thx for the video. It's crazy, but the hair quality in ultra or cinematic makes the flicker shadows. This could be a bug. I tested it with the RTX 4090 in 4K.
Hair quality has nothing to do with it. Shadows are shit in this game without full RT.
@@Reactx7 I tested it. Try it. Set the Hairs down to high and the shadows are quieter.
My pc will spit on me if I run this game
Can you test the 6700xt next? 😊
Question : Post 29:25 using the frame gen at higher fps, do you notice a lot of input lag or aiming for even higher fps would reduce it ?
is any of thos with ray tracing i asume not or the game is that much better optimised then the benchmark tool
Would be really nice if you could have access to a 4090 so we can see how well it can do in newer games
man i guess i should save up for a ryzen 15th gen i9090k Ti to be able to play this game at 30fps average at 480p
i watched penguin0 vid of the game he did good the SMOKE intro level is perfect for benchmarking tuning
A 7900xtx video would be awesome 😎
They graduate from so many universities, yet they can't properly code an optimization. We endure the hardships while they enjoy the benefits
Which is the best one without input lag
Considering buying this game
It's really, really fun. The graphics are (of course) great, the combat is fun, and the cutscenes are amazing.
If there's one downside, it's that it can be a bit difficult to find your way around.
it's solid, but it's way overhyped
@@_n8thagr8_63it’s really not, Cyberpunk was overhyped
This one was just hyped
@Eldron2027 how was cp overhyped? Its one of the best games of the past decade
@@Atzmn are you actually serious or fanboying much ?
The technical mess at launch, over promising, under delivering, choices that don’t really matter, broken mechanics and etc
I’m not saying the game is bad
In fact I’m playing it rn
But it was the definition of overhype
The game stutters with or without RT on. It has traversal stutters. An iconic problem of UE.
It was absolutely not the 4070's fault. anyway i play 4070 on 27 1440p monitor dlss performance frame gen on optimized/quality with ray tracing very high 80/100 frames (1440p dlss performance = 1080p dlss quality)
HELLO does the fps base on gpu or is cpu matter too ?
If I had a 4090, I would use RT, but I have a 4080s, I didn't really have any problems playing without RT. I couldn't really feel anything other than the shadows getting darker.
And the difference between DLSS quality and performance isn't noticeable at 4k.
I'm with you on that. I also have 4080S and have 0 interest in RT. Bought this gpu to be able to play at 4K thanks to the DLSS. 4K HUB Quality preset + dlss quality + frame gen. Solid 100fps with high resolution and graphical settings is much more preferable to me than some unneccessary lights that take %50 of my fps.
don't worry my 4090 gets smoked as well in ray tracing at 4k without FG
@@shuyaku99is frame gen worth the hype?
@@Wodagazowana5000 it's pretty good. The only thing is matter is how devs integrate FG into game. Because sometimes it's great, sometimes it should be turned on only in the case of emergency. In BM:W it's like normal, idk
@@Wodagazowana5000 if your base framerate is AT LEAST around 45 then yes, worth enabling, otherwise don't bother as the input lag is massive
I hope that they launch a patch for optimized performance on PC.
looks like optimization is a mess.. yes its UE5 but this is too much... RX5700XT and RTX 2060 is recommended.. can they even run 1080p medium setting in 60fps..
EDIT: just checked.. nop they can not 5700XT 1080p medium is 50+fps... GPU that is recommended should run very high setting in 1080p 60fps
Is it worth disabling some cores to match the 7800x3d if I have a 7900x3d? I see him do this in every video and I’m curious how he does it and how much of a difference it can be with a 7900x3d
it would be interesting to see how 1060 or 1070 works in this game with FSR frame generation
Is it normal that Frame Generation (I have a 7900 XTX) ignores the frame cap ? The FPS sometimes go over 144 which causes screen tearing on my 4K 144Hz monitor.
Are you saying that the imput lag comes from the FG and the rtx?
FG increases input lag
4050 because im motha truckin NITR0
Crispies ❤
30 FPS with a 4080 SUPER without RT is WILD!
could you possibly test the 6700xt in black myth wukong?
Great vid 🫡
So , the optimized is good?
start with the 3060ti after you finish the 40 series pls and also test some amd gpus and the intel arc
hey kryzzp make video on rx590. I want to buy that gpu! how did you miss it man?
Never seen it at an attractive price point!
@@zWORMzGaming but here it is just 10k rupees or 107 euros
Atleast we have a new highest pc requirement game right
4080 super dlss performance and even then the game cant squeeze better performance... But anyway thank you for the vid!
1:03 DLAA is not native. What are you talking about?
Yes it is.
@@zWORMzGaming No. No it's not.
True actual performance tests that are scoring a native rasterized resolution rendering do not include the use of any artificial intelligence processed spatial anti-aliasing.
Even some recent titles don't even include DLAA while others force it. Native is native. Any AI software used will make it no longer native.
DLAA is the same as DLSS but uses native resolution alone rather than including a additional upscale process. DLAA most definitely will change the actual image/performance on a native rendered resolution. Or why would it exist?
DLAA algorithm does improve image quality and sometimes at a slight performance hit. It's a AI powered software solution that alters the image before the image is sent to the display.
Not native. Native has no other help.... Ever.
You're wrong.
Can you do 6700xt next?
Coming tomorrow :)
now im happy that i get 70 FPS with my 3070 in high at least!
Can u try a 3070 or 3070 ti ?
Seem to be running pretty great in 4k with the upscalers. Why are you disappointed Kryzzp 😅
Because FG with 60-70 fps feels bad
@@zWORMzGaming MEU HERÓI FALOU COMIGO!1! Well yes but at performance DLSS you were hitting 110-120, that should be better no? Or was the graphic quality too reduced for you?
You meant downscalers. Yeah if 1080p quality is good enough for you without hitting 60fps on 1k usd gpu then I have no words
@@n3on440 errm if you think 4k with dlss performance and native 1080p are the same thing perhaps the eye doctor appointment is overdue
can you try some budget amd gpus
Spin your staff to repels projectiles attack or homing magic dude lol
Ohh when u get a chance test those super cards on ready or not please thanks. write that down on your notebook
so...where are the MAX settings??? i watched an entire video but didnt see it at any resolution!!!!!!
Some amd benchmark action with RX 6800 for wukong??
Ok card for 1080p @ 30fps medium settings or 720p 60fps high
broke 120+ now its 144 to 165fps and DONE. takes deep breaths omg...
1080p U:TRA+ due to adaption you cant really select setting anyway
4070ti super 16 or 4080 súper?
Now you can undertand dark souls and elden ring.
You gotta give your liver to obtain a high end 40 series card to still have to use dlss or frame generation. 😭
Do AMD cards next
Looking for a 7900XTX optimized settings myself
why don't you test amd's high end gpu like 7900xtx?
AMD doesn't send me cards yet. They contacted me a couple of weeks ago, but still waiting to see where that goes.
watching from my monitor on 1440p youtube and monitor 1440p but why youtube always look bad quality i mean when u pl;ay this on your own monitor and pc it will blow your mind the graphics and quality right?
It's because UA-cam compresses the video and it makes the quality worse than it is in game.
I run the game maxed at DLSS P with Max RT on a 4090. Without Frame-gen (which doesn't look great especially with the UI) I can't lock at 60 haha
is frametime spikes normal in this game? like stutter
that F ING 4080 super the best all around GPU and its running miserable
Bro forgot about the 4090
@@Atzmn4080 is best all around GPU where 4090 is too much expensive it's basically over priced
@@user-nl2ho9gk3y its really not overpriced at msrp lol
Global illumination in this game are really heavy you can turn it off by choosing low.
So we set low settings on almost the best consumer gpu that costs more than 1k usd. Good to hear.
@@n3on440 i’m just giving out a tips don’t really mean to do it on the 4080 super.
I wonder how would a 6950 XT stack in this game.
Isn't 50% balanced, not performance? Quality would be 1440p, balanced 1080p etc.
Nope
I dont get it, i have a 4080 super + ryzen 5 7600x and play this game at 1440p with cinematic settings + raytracing on medium
I get around 120 fps max and 90 minimum...how is this bad?
Interesting, I'm getting an RTX 4080S shortly so I'm interested to know if this benchmark was well done.
@Alejandro-hl5zc the guy above has framegen and downscale(dlss) enabled so don't be misinformed
I guess max settings on new games are only for future gpus
nowadays game devs take gamers for granted & sadly the green inc supports them with upscaling techs
The red and blue inc. does too.
It is called a consumer degradation. Feed them with bs until they fully accept it
The challenge is to see if he can beat the game before he benchmarks all the gpus i know i wouldn't be able to 😂
Could you try it with an rx6600?
aye w vid my man
Im glad i got 4070 for 1440p, cos 4080 not worth it at all!