KF51 Panther does not have an unmanned turret. The gunner and commander are seated in the turret either side of the gun breach. KF51 is also ONLY “based on the hull of Leopard 2A4” for demonstration purposes, in order to save on costs. Were it to enter service, it will have a fully new hull. This was confirmed by Rheinmetall and reported by Janes in late 2022.
Yeah, the best tank for the peaceful time. Comfortable, pleasant. The main thing is not to let them into battle, that’s not what they were created for.
I'd rather be in an Abrams or Merkava as far as survivability, but the Challenger and Leopard series are true beasts if you have the element of surprise. Those two are the snipers of the MBT world, and the Leopard is the best looking of the lot.
@@JsDs1020 The Merkava only has protection against older semi-civilian rebel grenade launchers. It has no protection from shells from other tanks, it is huge and very vulnerable. Abrams - approximately the same, it is not very fast, but a large tank with shells in the turret, it is extremely vulnerable on the battlefield. Isn't it strange that a tank can be destroyed by a bullet from a large-caliber gun? The T-90 can shoot them from a safe distance, it is small and better armored.
The abrams ur showing as a pictures is an abrams x which was a protoype for an expo to see how good they could make an abrams, the e3 will look entirely different
they actually missed out on the mgcs-line battletank which is a german-french coproduction and supposed to be the leopard 3 aswell as the successor of the le clerc.
@@Ubeer85 I couldn't find any information confirming what you wrote. I did actually found the opposite with the german minister of defence asserting the collaboration of the french and german on the MGCS programme in october 2023.
Leclerc XLR is just a stop gap until the EMBT or a derivative of it replace it and not a proper upgrade, if the franco german program fails yet again with germany draging another manufacturer breaking the 50/50 balance into 2/3 german and 1/3 french split As I guess it will end up like the Europanzer program if it keeps going liek that The XLR upgrade doesn't add much other than some updated comms + essentialy the AZUR armor package and supposedly a dual purpose HE shell
About the Altay Tank, Yes Koreas was a big help in the project, thanks to the technology transfer, Turkiye could speed up the development of the Tank significantly. Originally it was planned to use some German components, (Periscopes, Power Pack etc.), Germany suddenly sanctioned Turkiye, thus delaying the Project. This delay time was used to further localise the Tank components, to become fully independent(especially from an unreliable Partner like Germany). Today all components except for the Power Pack, are local. (developing a reliable 1500+ HP Power Pack(Engine+Gearing) for a Tank, without breaching existing licences, is not an easy task) To not delay the Project even further, Turkiye and Korea reached an agreement, and the Altay will use the recently developed Korean Power Pack in the first batch of Tanks(maybe 2. too). Thank You Korea, for your Support!
Acknowledging it this is still looks amazing how Turks still rely on such unreliable 'partner' as USA in much more important and costly equipment - aviation, air defense... Hope they will realize its criticality too.
@@alexanderkharin7036 They are already working on that. For aviation they developed/are developing the Hurkus turboprop trainer, Hurjet jettrainer and Kaan Jetfighter. The engines are still American, but they work on that too, with the TEI TF-10000 as the first step. But it will take years till the Kaan is in serial production, that's why they look for an intermediate solution(F-16 Viper, Eurofighter etc.). For Air defense they have developed the Hisar System with up to 100km range and are working now on the Siper System for extended 100+km range.
nothing on the Altay components are turkish developments build from scratch... for that turkey lacks the knowlege. Main gun still is the licens copy of the RH 120L55A1 gun which was technical transfer from Korea. Engine transmission, firecontroll, thermal view all korean.. the powerpack showed howlittle turkey know about engine transmission development....Germany pulled the trigger on MTU engine and Renk transmission with throw back the Altay program by 10years... they tryed Ukraine engine transmissions which were not powerfull and reliable enough, they tryed a development together with Austria... after some verbal alluts by Erdogan on Autria ...they recived the middlefinger and Autria channceled the project... which left Turkey again with a Tank without engine and transmission... Meantime Korea was finaly able to offer a own developt engine transmission pack from their K2 ... which took them a full decade to develop... just to get a powerpack that has less performance much lower reliability and is more heavy than the 4 decade old MTU Renk Powerpack from the LEo2... on top of that the Korean powerpack is more heavy... but at least after 10year long Journy they have a engine for the Altay... the Altay is a cheap scale down version of the K2 were they phased out auto loader and hydraulic suspension The Altay is a good example how not the manage a expansive large scale weapon development program...
@@nagmashot Turkiye is building submarines, frigates, air defence systems, missiles, uavs, aircrafts, armored vehicles all in parallel in far limited budget than France, England, Germany etc. besides feeding 400K+ men army. Yes Turkiye had problems with engine. However, but it had these problems with engines of UAVs, missiles and armored vehicles. Now UAVs, missiles like atmaca anti ship missile, cruise missiles are flying with natively build turkish engines. It goes same with armored vehicles. 500hp, 1000hp engines have been built and new armored vehicles are being delivered with Turkish engines. 1500hp engine and transmission are under development. In any case, the armor of the tank, all fire control systems, protection systems (active, passive), warning systems etc are in house built. I believe all those sanctions are backfired and motivated Turkiye to do its own things. With the help of these sanctions, now there are more than 1500 defence related companiess in Turkiye. So eventually Turkiye will reach that capability as well.... I believe turkiye is doing an examplary work.
I'd love see an actual demo of how these behemoths would handle the latest anti-tank weapons...including the latest iteration of suicide drones. How many of these cheap, but potent drones would it take to overwhelm their defenses? How about a drone coming in at grass-top level from behind? The Ukrainians are pretty adept at flying their FPV drones into the small openings. I am sure the bottom of these tanks are well protected from mines. What about the suspension and tracks? Can be take out from underneath? I'm not ragging on these new MBT's but I'd love to see how they actually perform on the current battlefield.
Jammers. That’s all. Drones are already seeing their effectiveness against tanks dimishing as the tanks mount jammer systems as standard. Before long, they’ll be worthless
@@ArmorCast 1. Modern drones can change frequencies randomly, this reduces the effectiveness of jammers. 2. Modern drones are aimed automatically by locking onto a target. Nazi tanks are already being destroyed like this. 3. Tank with a jammer = tank with a beacon: fire artillery at me.
@@ArmorCast Good point. That's why I'd like to see actual demonstrations of their systems in the field. Love to see how they addressed the various threats in realtime. Could be enlightening. Of course, why would any manufacturer show their hand.
@@MultiNike79 Good counterpoints. The sophistication of these evolving drones will only get better, but this increases complexity, cost and weight. For countries like Ukraine, who are doing an amazing job taking out armor with inexpensive FPV drones, the higher cost of will probably be a factor - at least when swarming numbers needed to overwhelm new tech. We shall see.
@@Spaatz77 You live a little in the realm of myths. Not Ukraine, but the Nazi regime. This already happened under Hitler with his version of the European Union, with the same combat groups. Those guys who made the Holocaust used the same slogans, attributes, and Hitler’s activists are their heroes (let’s say SS officer Shukhevych, mass murderer Bandera and everyone else). In particular, they use the same crosses on the same German equipment. In the Russian army, approximately half of the soldiers are Ukrainians who have not betrayed the local culture. There are still many people in Ukraine literally waiting for liberation - in particular, this is why Russia can destroy weapons warehouses. Then, the bulk of weapons and the same drones come from the Europeans with their Fourth Reich. The production itself in Ukraine is scanty and Russia is constantly destroying all found workshops. You can even ask the locals to go and check whether drones are gathering here. We are dealing with a post-modern version of the Second World War: as a result, the Europeans invaded deep into Russia, destroyed the lives of tens of millions of people, but Russia will inevitably defeat the invasion and return to explain that you cannot be animals.
(Warning: Read all instead of talking shit in the comments, Thank you) Bro the T-14 Armata is almost 10 years old from now, russians said they are working on T-14BArmata, a variant of the Original T-14 with a 152mm gun that was planned (they like this calliber a lot), some IA at Controls and can launch Lancet Drones (they already uses ATGM launchers in their tanks like T-90M and the original armata) i dont know if russia can afford this, but you being anti-russia or not admit this tank is cool and beautifull and russia created the 4th gen tanks with the Armata, the engine is a new prototype of cross X engine so it always had some issues, the Armored Survivability Capsule is something that they was needed, compared with T-72, T-80 and T-90 that had the crew vulnerable at the Ammorack the turret in T-14 is Unmanned and the ammorack is inside a armored compartment Separated fron the crew, a cool concept
the pictures you use for the Leopard 2A8 are pictures of the 2A7+, 2A7V and 2A7A1 (Trophy testbed), there are as of now no actual pictures of the Leopard 2A8 Same thing with the M1E3 Abrams, all things you show are the Abrams X Tech demonstrator, there are no pictures of the M1E3 as of yet (since they most likely didn't even build the thing yet)
People who say the M1 Abrams is the best tank just Because it’s American. It uses British chobham armour which is any tank’s largest component and has 9 other European components on the tank. Just like the F35 it’s a multinational vehicle. Just like all the tanks in nato are all very similar it’s more down to the crew on these tanks.
It's funny that Chobham was stolen from the USSR. The USSR was the first to produce tanks with such armor. It’s also funny that the vertical take-off system for the F35 was also bought from Russia. + materials for aircraft are bought in Russia even now.
Countries never have money to end homelessness but somehow always seem to be able to put millions and millions in a couple of new fancy weapon systems.
KF51 will be probably abandoned due 130MM is overkill, this happened after test on newest version Russian T-90 cannot survive hit from 120MM APDS from late 90s at front with relict added.
The T-90 has approximately 1.5 times the radius of aimed fire, so it only needs to keep European tanks away from it. And at the moment there is no weapon capable of penetrating the frontal armor of new Russian tanks.
@@saladv6069 the real point is that whole NATO is using one type of tank ammo so all countries would need to switch into 130mm and there is no good point for this change and there is nothing on the enemmy side that would require that extra power.
The Merkava's armor cannot withstand a hit from almost any modern tank, its armor is only meant to protect against autocannons. It is made of a type of composite armor which offers it exceptional resistance to HEAT weapons like missiles, rockets, and other shaped charge warheads. There are two types of protection of which modern armor provides, these are fundamental to understanding how these tanks work. There is Chemical Energy (CE), and Kinetic Energy (KE), the goal of most tanks is to achieve a good level of protection in both, but some tanks prioritize one over the other. Russian tanks generally have prioritized KE, while using ERA to make up for the lack of CE protection, while Israel prioritizes CE due to the large amount of urban operations and guerilla warfare that they face. There is no perfect analogy for them I think, but imagine them as two types of body armor. Imagine CE as a suit of Kevlar you wear to protect you from the most common threat of battlefield, shrapnel, the suit makes you safe from much artillery and grenades but you can still be shot and killed by rifle. KE is like body armor plates, it won't protect you from shrapnel but it protect you from bullets. The goal is to have both but is very hard because the are different and heavy.
Everyone was shitting on the French autoloader of the Leclerc but both projects of the German army (EMBT and Panther) use the exact same autoloader (for the panther it’s the same but built in Germany) and you know why ? Because it’s safer and faster than most of loaded (don’t explode like a t90 bc the ammo rack is in the turret, faster than a manual that close the safety door of the ammo because a manual loader can be faster but that’s very risky he don’t have the time to close the anti-explosion door)
It can't explode from a frontal or lateral armor hit, it can explode from a frontal or lateral turret hit. Blowout panels aren't magic, if the door sealing the ammo off is breached it's GG no Re.
Hmm, is there alternative physics in Europe? The T-90's ammunition is located at the bottom of the tank, in the most protected part of the hull. Placing them in a tower is anti-scientific; this is the most vulnerable position. Which, in addition, Western tanks have no armor. There are positions when they can be destroyed using a powerful gun. Therefore, T-90s can survive a battle and return, but Leopards do not survive a battle.
@@MultiNike79 Ammo in T-90 is with the crew... one hit there and the whole tank and its crew is no more. Hiting in the ammo in your "anti-scientific" example is just hitting the ammo and ofc the ammo can be lost because of it but not the whole tank or its crew... And no the hull of T-90 is not well protected its many times crapier than the turret of that tank so you are simply inventing fake excusses for something that was done like that beace it was easy and cheap... also hit into turret of T-90 have huge chance to start fire of that T-90 tank ammo!
@@Bialy_1 Man, you sound like an idealist. Do not do it this way. There are hit statistics. It is extremely difficult to hit the T-90's ammunition; it can withstand almost a hundred hits without explosions. Even if it hits the ammunition, it does not light up immediately and the crew has time to leave the tank. On the other hand: if a shell or mine hits a tank, then the crew will almost certainly be wounded or killed. Also, the thin protection between the tower and the shells is weak. If the jet passes through the shells and reaches this armor, the crew will definitely be fried. But 80% of hits to a tank are hits to the turret. And the Leopards have no armor there at all. Doesn't it bother you that 100% of Challenger 2s that were shot down threw the turret? The T-90 hull has the best all-round protection among existing Western tanks (actually, except for the Leclerc - they cannot be considered tanks). It is a fact.
@@MultiNike79 There's one mistake: while you are correct that higher up = easier to hit, tanks have the heaviest armour on the turret front. Issue with most NAFO bots is they forget that the only tank with fully blowout panel protected ammo, Abrams, has horrifically bad top armour (30 mm RHA on the turret roof).
It is the only country that is seriously interested in KF51 and has invested money in the development. On the same day it signed the contract with Rheinmetall for the KF51, it ALSO ordered skyranger30 drone defense systems built on the KF41 chassis. Of course, it was agreed well in advance, half a year before signing the contract, he had already ordered mistral3 missiles (necessary for the skyranger) from the French manufacturer...
The problem with any vehicle or military is the area in which they’re primarily based in and most likely to deal with, such as the German leopard whilst the best armored tank out there, fight me in that, is mostly due to the leopard being designed to deal with large, open and primarily flat terrain, much like the British challenger 2 being idealistic in the open and hilly countrysides all the while being able to fight at longer ranges compared to its competitors, as for the AMX lecrerc, whilst its much lighter than its European counterparts it’s similar in the same ways as the Italian c1 ariete in the sense that France tends to be very mountainous as well as large and open, whilst being densely wooded, meaning that for the French and Italians and even the Russians army relies more on mobility over outright firepower or heavy armor, again just because a tank is better on paper doesn’t entirely mean that it’s better in actual combat, take the tiger as an example in which most people tend to laugh at British tanks for being unreliable but in actuality German tanks or heavy tanks were far far more unreliable than their British counterparts and in reality, British tanks were actually some of the most reliable tanks throughout the war, as for the myths of British unreliable tanks during ww2 was in part due to the terrible location and design of British tank engine filters, being primarily based at the back and to the sides of the tank, meaning that as the tank drove along, any and all dust clouds or particles would typically end up getting sucked back into the engine causing the tank to stall, again, tanks like the Matilda, Cromwell and Churchill all have outlasted most of their foreign counterparts, the only exceptions were the Sherman’s and the T34’s but that’s due in part to how cheap they were, tanks like the centurion and Churchill we’re extensively used all the way to Korea and in the case of the centurion, is even used to this day
The Leo2 A8 Prototype is not a A8 ...thats the Leo2 A7A1 that comes this year, there are no picctures of the A8 and no technical details avaible...so all technical claims are not real facts
@@thomaspickard4138 Hello, the British stole Chobham from the USSR, which was the first to create tanks with such armor. The British captured some Soviet tanks and copied their technology. Specifically, Challenger 2 essentially has no armor, it’s like an elephant with a small shield on its chest - hunters don’t care about this shield. Are you surprised that 100% of the Challengers that were shot down threw their turrets?
@@badwolf66 The T-64 was the first tank with combined armor, developed before the 1960s, and in the early 1960s the British began developing their Chobham. In principle, the USSR did a huge amount of work on researching different types of armor, including, as far as we know, almost complete analogues of Chobham. Considering that the USSR had drawings of Western tanks even before they were put on the assembly line, I think that there was also a reverse flow.
main cannon for what killing another tank? or destroying a fortification? why have a main gun instead you can launch missles or killer drones from an armored platform. tanks are not outdated but theiir canons do
They just Wikipediaed the hell out and made a video with open source pics. Nothing is new here and they even missed the coming joint Leopard-Leclerc one.
@@fightingspirit-rl8xb APS : Active Protection System, a weapon system designed to automaticaly spot and shoot down projectiles that will impact the vehicle directly (Trophy system, ARENA, Iron Fist) or actively jam the controls of Anti tank guided missile via infrared signals (SHTORA aka the "red eyes" of the T-90) APFSDS : Armor Piercing Fin Stabilised Discarding Sabot, the common non explosive anti tank round used by about all tanks nowadays
The only tank that could be build NOW and would work is the Panther. It uses the vehcile of the Leopard2 and the ability to replace the actual 1500HP engine by a 2500hp engine. The 130mm-gun is superior to anything else. the NATO just should start to produce this tank, say 5000-1000 of them. So the price per unit will drop and all NATO states could switch to it.
Есть пооблема. Они выглядят уж больно местически. Вы точно в серию их пустите. А то у многих возникают сомнения. Ладно т 14 армата, на него посмотриш и поймёш что такое построить можно. Но вот абромс... Зачем ебу во лбу корпуса какойто отсек с зарядной для планшета как будто?
@@FinnisJaegerNew APFSDS introduced last year can penetrate 900mm of armour. There's no way leopard's UFP is tanking that and what's funny is that this ammunition works on any type of russian 125mm gun. And we didn't even start talking about the ATGMs.
@@georgeousthegorgeous lol. Claim made by ruski mod yes? I claim that my new apfsds model P.E.N can penetrate the whole kremlin twice. Also you understand that the "newest" apfsds rounds developed by russia can only be usee by the turret bustle loader that they dont even have in active use.
The Arjun is Indeed heavy as it is Similar to the T 90 tank of Russia, Arjun incorporates heavy Alloy armor compared to Depleted uranium armors of Western tanks, They're built to be rigid as India faces consistent conflicts with terrorist groups which primaly use RPGs and small arms
@@itz_me_kratos so it's more likely had armour to protect it from deep penetration weapons, but does it have counter measure system like Israel Merkava
@@sanasshushu3905 Arjun isn't that good of a tank. It uses a rifle barrel. Which is being phased out by the British military and many other countries around the world today. The Germans, Americans and French. Moved away from the rifle barrel tank gun, during the late 80s. Another problem with arjun is the fact it doesn't even have its ammo sealed from the crew. The only tank that has all of its ammo stored away from the crew in active service, is the m1 abrams.
@@travismccraw6013 hmm ig I have to read about it's specifications than , it seems interesting cause if u saying is true than ig this tank is not much of a load for an enemy, but i can't say anything without learning about Arjun myself first
@@danbatesy5492 no weapon can save ukraine, not everything is about weapons its about how do you use it, look what happened for the merkavah in g.a.za
@@HereNowOOO no not got to that rank yet. But got to ask why the t14 how long as it been going it’s been years and all it’s done is a parade and that broke down and why haven’t they put it on the battlefield?.
The Merkava is a good tank, but the Leopard turned out to be an unsuccessful tank, as the war in Ukraine showed. Unfortunately, Russia destroyed almost all the Leopard tanks that NATO supplied to Ukraine. We need good tanks like the Merkava.
The Americans and the British banned the Ukrainians from using their tanks because the hunt for the big German cats was over.Greta called for the rescue of Leopards from Ukraine
@@Tonius126 That's right. That old ship could sail, unlike the new British aircraft carriers that leaked water. If the English continue to behave arrogantly, England could be the new Atlantis.
@@draganbabic1030 Aunque me molesta tener que defender a los ingleses, el último tipo que penso eso, tenía un bigote gracioso y se pegó un tiro en un bunker. Los que han perdido 2000 tanques en ucrania, son los rusos. Así que dejate de propaganda rusa y pon los pies en el suelo.
@@JesusSanchez-ij5de You personally ran around the remnants of ukraine with a notepad and counted losses. You are even more ridiculous and useless than your president!
And , what about Russian Armata platform ? Which actually IS operational! Unlike the new Abrams and new ''Panther'' ... Or Russia ,has been ''cancelled'', so Russian achievements would be ignored at will? Really ?!?!
No proven to be operatonal in any theatre of war yet, but given that this video is about "planned" tanks the Armatar is alreeay done with it's development yes?
@@kieranholland1048 All the tanks listed here are still fantastic. The Armata was in production, but they decided to update it using the experience of fighting the Nazis. Presumably, there is nothing better than it.
@@MultiNike79 "but they decided to update it using the experience of fighting the Nazis." But Prigozhin stoped the march for justice before he reached Moscow and i do not think that Putin will be shooting with T-14 at himself... Not to mention that the T-14 is a tank for Red Square parades and not for real combat!
@@Bialy_1 It’s scary that similar nonsense could be heard from Europeans 80 years ago. You commit crimes because you are completely inadequate and do not learn from your mistakes. Remember that Hitler also lied a lot, but he had to shoot himself when the Russians liberated Berlin.
@@kieranholland1048 MOSCOW, April 19. /TASS/. The T-14 tank on the heavy tracked vehicle platform has been tested in Syria, Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov said on Sunday. "Yes, that’s right. They [Armata tanks] were used in Syria," he said in an interview with the Deistvuyushchiye Litsa (Political Actors) with Nailya Asker-zade program on the Rossiya-1 television channel answering a corresponding question. "They were used in field conditions, in Syria, so, we took into account all the nuances." Alexander Potapov, CEO of Uravagonzavod, the tank’s developer and manufacturer (incorporated into Rostec corporation), said in an interview with the Vedomosti daily on February 3 that first batches of Aramata tanks would be supplied to the Russian army in 2020 for field trials.
They should come up with something new and/or ditch the hybrid style it is and rethink the engine positioning as it does not offer the protection against modern rounds. Also the mobility begings to be issue.. turret is great, the hull not so much.
@@Tedger Almost all of those videos you see in the Arab media of "successful" RPG hits on Merkava's and Namers are in fact successful Trophy interceptions exploding the missiles before even reaching the vehicles. The only videos of actually destroyed tanks were the ones from the 7th of October that weren't even manned in most cases, or were hit by a drone or of tanks that weren't prepped for combat.
As for Western tanks, they have an extremely outdated design relevant to the 1970s. The idea then was that 40,000 Soviet tanks would attack, supported by hundreds of nuclear bombs in the breakthrough zone. And Western tanks had to hide in the folds of the terrain, fire a few shots and run away while aviation destroyed the civilian population of the USSR. Therefore, they have a heavy forehead and almost zero armor on the sides (they are not designed for attacks), and huge sizes. However, the advent of drones and battle design optimized for the Russian army turned all Western tanks into simply bad self-propelled guns. High altitude, low mobility, lack of armor, a gun with an effective firing radius 1.5 times smaller than that of Russian tanks - it is not surprising that the German government is now crying - Scholz and Merkel have worse situations than Hitler, but the sins are the same.
@@JAGtheTrekkieGEMINI1701 Are you not aware that the main dream of European leaders is to destroy all Russians? Haven’t you heard about Hitler, Mannerheim, Churchill? Plan "The Unthinkable"? Why do Americans need so many bombers in Europe? Romanian, Hungarian, French, Spanish, Czech, Danish, Swedish leaders who publicly declared the need to exterminate all Russians? That there is an active genocide of Russians going on right now? Yes, it is post-modern, it includes serious brainwashing, but if we accept that Ukrainians are Russians deprived of the right to vote and freedom, then how does the phrase sound that “the war will go on until the last Ukrainian”? Open anti-Russian Nazism of current Europe? Non-compliance with treaties by Europeans? Don’t you see that Europeans and Ukrainian leaders treat the residents of Donbass and Crimea literally, like cockroaches? Complete ignorance of their suffering? Europe is pure evil, think with your head and use facts for this.
All tanks are designed with heavy forward armor. Including Soviet/Russian tanks. That is why the Javelin anti-tank missile is designed with a top attack option. As far as drones go, Russian tanks seem to be every bit as vulnerable to drone attacks as any other. Russia’s biggest problem is they suck at combined operations. That is why they have lost so many tanks in Ukraine. When it comes to bombing civilian targets, Russia has no problem at all with killing civilians.
You don’t have a clue right ? 🙂 Attack helis and at rockets can destroy a mbt since 30 years… all depend on the tactics of infantry position and mobilization. Play chess 🙏
![Nazi Super Tank - P-1000 Ratte - [ Largest Tank EVER ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6mfhalEjUrw/mqdefault.jpg)
KF51 Panther does not have an unmanned turret. The gunner and commander are seated in the turret either side of the gun breach.
KF51 is also ONLY “based on the hull of Leopard 2A4” for demonstration purposes, in order to save on costs. Were it to enter service, it will have a fully new hull. This was confirmed by Rheinmetall and reported by Janes in late 2022.
"breech"
@@stevenbreach2561 do not preach
lmao. called out
WarThunder gonna be sick
I mean challie 3 already in, added even before the british army were able to
The leaks are going to go crazy
agreed can't wait to grind 600k research points for the Leopard 2A8 on tier 9
The Leopard and Panther both look completely first class…..🇬🇧
i would say that the Clerk looks dangerous too ;) sad that she was not included here ;)
Yeah, the best tank for the peaceful time. Comfortable, pleasant. The main thing is not to let them into battle, that’s not what they were created for.
I'd rather be in an Abrams or Merkava as far as survivability, but the Challenger and Leopard series are true beasts if you have the element of surprise. Those two are the snipers of the MBT world, and the Leopard is the best looking of the lot.
@@JsDs1020 The Merkava only has protection against older semi-civilian rebel grenade launchers. It has no protection from shells from other tanks, it is huge and very vulnerable.
Abrams - approximately the same, it is not very fast, but a large tank with shells in the turret, it is extremely vulnerable on the battlefield. Isn't it strange that a tank can be destroyed by a bullet from a large-caliber gun?
The T-90 can shoot them from a safe distance, it is small and better armored.
@@MultiNike79 That's right I forgot the Abrams doesn't have the feature where there turret shoots 400 feet in the air after a drone hits it.
Tank Challenger 3 England Top Is Spectacular 🏴
The abrams ur showing as a pictures is an abrams x which was a protoype for an expo to see how good they could make an abrams, the e3 will look entirely different
Updated my ass... The Leclerc XLR isnt "forthcomming", its already in service
they actually missed out on the mgcs-line battletank which is a german-french coproduction and supposed to be the leopard 3 aswell as the successor of the le clerc.
@@Ubeer85 I couldn't find any information confirming what you wrote. I did actually found the opposite with the german minister of defence asserting the collaboration of the french and german on the MGCS programme in october 2023.
dunno anything about it being called Leopard 3 or anything like that, only thing I heard about it is it being called "Europanzer"
Tank you for this caliber of content Buzz.
Leclerc XLR is just a stop gap until the EMBT or a derivative of it replace it and not a proper upgrade, if the franco german program fails yet again with germany draging another manufacturer breaking the 50/50 balance into 2/3 german and 1/3 french split
As I guess it will end up like the Europanzer program if it keeps going liek that
The XLR upgrade doesn't add much other than some updated comms + essentialy the AZUR armor package and supposedly a dual purpose HE shell
Your voice is so relaxing, thank you, very informative
'Le Clerc' not 'Lec Lerc' 😉
I'm waiting for the Lecler-Leopard Mixt
About the Altay Tank,
Yes Koreas was a big help in the project, thanks to the technology transfer, Turkiye could speed up the development of the Tank significantly.
Originally it was planned to use some German components, (Periscopes, Power Pack etc.), Germany suddenly sanctioned Turkiye, thus delaying the Project.
This delay time was used to further localise the Tank components, to become fully independent(especially from an unreliable Partner like Germany).
Today all components except for the Power Pack, are local. (developing a reliable 1500+ HP Power Pack(Engine+Gearing) for a Tank, without breaching existing licences, is not an easy task)
To not delay the Project even further, Turkiye and Korea reached an agreement, and the Altay will use the recently developed Korean Power Pack in the first batch of Tanks(maybe 2. too).
Thank You Korea, for your Support!
Acknowledging it this is still looks amazing how Turks still rely on such unreliable 'partner' as USA in much more important and costly equipment - aviation, air defense... Hope they will realize its criticality too.
@@alexanderkharin7036 They are already working on that.
For aviation they developed/are developing the Hurkus turboprop trainer, Hurjet jettrainer and Kaan Jetfighter.
The engines are still American, but they work on that too, with the TEI TF-10000 as the first step.
But it will take years till the Kaan is in serial production, that's why they look for an intermediate solution(F-16 Viper, Eurofighter etc.).
For Air defense they have developed the Hisar System with up to 100km range and are working now on the Siper System for extended 100+km range.
nothing on the Altay components are turkish developments build from scratch... for that turkey lacks the knowlege.
Main gun still is the licens copy of the RH 120L55A1 gun which was technical transfer from Korea.
Engine transmission, firecontroll, thermal view all korean.. the powerpack showed howlittle turkey know about engine transmission development....Germany pulled the trigger on MTU engine and Renk transmission with throw back the Altay program by 10years... they tryed Ukraine engine transmissions which were not powerfull and reliable enough, they tryed a development together with Austria... after some verbal alluts by Erdogan on Autria ...they recived the middlefinger and Autria channceled the project... which left Turkey again with a Tank without engine and transmission...
Meantime Korea was finaly able to offer a own developt engine transmission pack from their K2 ... which took them a full decade to develop... just to get a powerpack that has less performance much lower reliability and is more heavy than the 4 decade old MTU Renk Powerpack from the LEo2... on top of that the Korean powerpack is more heavy... but at least after 10year long Journy they have a engine for the Altay...
the Altay is a cheap scale down version of the K2 were they phased out auto loader and hydraulic suspension
The Altay is a good example how not the manage a expansive large scale weapon development program...
@@nagmashot Turkiye is building submarines, frigates, air defence systems, missiles, uavs, aircrafts, armored vehicles all in parallel in far limited budget than France, England, Germany etc. besides feeding 400K+ men army. Yes Turkiye had problems with engine. However, but it had these problems with engines of UAVs, missiles and armored vehicles. Now UAVs, missiles like atmaca anti ship missile, cruise missiles are flying with natively build turkish engines. It goes same with armored vehicles. 500hp, 1000hp engines have been built and new armored vehicles are being delivered with Turkish engines. 1500hp engine and transmission are under development. In any case, the armor of the tank, all fire control systems, protection systems (active, passive), warning systems etc are in house built. I believe all those sanctions are backfired and motivated Turkiye to do its own things. With the help of these sanctions, now there are more than 1500 defence related companiess in Turkiye. So eventually Turkiye will reach that capability as well.... I believe turkiye is doing an examplary work.
I'd love see an actual demo of how these behemoths would handle the latest anti-tank weapons...including the latest iteration of suicide drones.
How many of these cheap, but potent drones would it take to overwhelm their defenses?
How about a drone coming in at grass-top level from behind? The Ukrainians are pretty adept at flying their FPV drones into the small openings. I am sure the bottom of these tanks are well protected from mines. What about the suspension and tracks? Can be take out from underneath?
I'm not ragging on these new MBT's but I'd love to see how they actually perform on the current battlefield.
Jammers. That’s all. Drones are already seeing their effectiveness against tanks dimishing as the tanks mount jammer systems as standard. Before long, they’ll be worthless
@@ArmorCast 1. Modern drones can change frequencies randomly, this reduces the effectiveness of jammers.
2. Modern drones are aimed automatically by locking onto a target. Nazi tanks are already being destroyed like this.
3. Tank with a jammer = tank with a beacon: fire artillery at me.
@@ArmorCast
Good point. That's why I'd like to see actual demonstrations of their systems in the field. Love to see how they addressed the various threats in realtime. Could be enlightening. Of course, why would any manufacturer show their hand.
@@MultiNike79
Good counterpoints. The sophistication of these evolving drones will only get better, but this increases complexity, cost and weight. For countries like Ukraine, who are doing an amazing job taking out armor with inexpensive FPV drones, the higher cost of will probably be a factor - at least when swarming numbers needed to overwhelm new tech.
We shall see.
@@Spaatz77 You live a little in the realm of myths.
Not Ukraine, but the Nazi regime. This already happened under Hitler with his version of the European Union, with the same combat groups. Those guys who made the Holocaust used the same slogans, attributes, and Hitler’s activists are their heroes (let’s say SS officer Shukhevych, mass murderer Bandera and everyone else). In particular, they use the same crosses on the same German equipment.
In the Russian army, approximately half of the soldiers are Ukrainians who have not betrayed the local culture. There are still many people in Ukraine literally waiting for liberation - in particular, this is why Russia can destroy weapons warehouses.
Then, the bulk of weapons and the same drones come from the Europeans with their Fourth Reich. The production itself in Ukraine is scanty and Russia is constantly destroying all found workshops. You can even ask the locals to go and check whether drones are gathering here.
We are dealing with a post-modern version of the Second World War: as a result, the Europeans invaded deep into Russia, destroyed the lives of tens of millions of people, but Russia will inevitably defeat the invasion and return to explain that you cannot be animals.
(Warning: Read all instead of talking shit in the comments, Thank you)
Bro the T-14 Armata is almost 10 years old from now, russians said they are working on T-14BArmata, a variant of the Original T-14 with a 152mm gun that was planned (they like this calliber a lot), some IA at Controls and can launch Lancet Drones (they already uses ATGM launchers in their tanks like T-90M and the original armata) i dont know if russia can afford this, but you being anti-russia or not admit this tank is cool and beautifull and russia created the 4th gen tanks with the Armata, the engine is a new prototype of cross X engine so it always had some issues, the Armored Survivability Capsule is something that they was needed, compared with T-72, T-80 and T-90 that had the crew vulnerable at the Ammorack the turret in T-14 is Unmanned and the ammorack is inside a armored compartment Separated fron the crew, a cool concept
The Leclerc tank is actually in service, he is not a future service tank
the pictures you use for the Leopard 2A8 are pictures of the 2A7+, 2A7V and 2A7A1 (Trophy testbed), there are as of now no actual pictures of the Leopard 2A8
Same thing with the M1E3 Abrams, all things you show are the Abrams X Tech demonstrator, there are no pictures of the M1E3 as of yet (since they most likely didn't even build the thing yet)
Where is the EMBT ?
People who say the M1 Abrams is the best tank just Because it’s American. It uses British chobham armour which is any tank’s largest component and has 9 other European components on the tank. Just like the F35 it’s a multinational vehicle. Just like all the tanks in nato are all very similar it’s more down to the crew on these tanks.
It's funny that Chobham was stolen from the USSR. The USSR was the first to produce tanks with such armor.
It’s also funny that the vertical take-off system for the F35 was also bought from Russia. + materials for aircraft are bought in Russia even now.
@@MultiNike79sources?
@@TheUmdexMan he is partially right, they where the first to use ceramic based armor
Awesome new MBTs 🎉🎉🎉
COMBINATION OF LEOPARD AND PANTHER 💪
Awesome content.
Countries never have money to end homelessness but somehow always seem to be able to put millions and millions in a couple of new fancy weapon systems.
You used the wrong cross on the Leo -_-
You used the one from WW1 you nobb
KF51 will be probably abandoned due 130MM is overkill, this happened after test on newest version Russian T-90 cannot survive hit from 120MM APDS from late 90s at front with relict added.
The point of the 130mm isn’t an increase in damage, it’s the increase in range and velocity.
@@saladv6069 Velocity =penetration
The T-90 has approximately 1.5 times the radius of aimed fire, so it only needs to keep European tanks away from it. And at the moment there is no weapon capable of penetrating the frontal armor of new Russian tanks.
@@MultiNike79 truly false
@@saladv6069 the real point is that whole NATO is using one type of tank ammo so all countries would need to switch into 130mm and there is no good point for this change and there is nothing on the enemmy side that would require that extra power.
my vision for future MBT is forget the canon, put VLS with a mix of missiles and drones plus a canon for close combat situation
Certainly no ballistics expert, but the Merkava appears to have the turret design!
Because it’s not a true mbt
I've heard it had the most elevation , maybe better for urban. Front engine / enter at the back. The Israelis have it dialed in for their needs.
@@TinyBearTim Among Western tank-like vehicles, probably only the Leclerc can be considered an MVT.
The Merkava's armor cannot withstand a hit from almost any modern tank, its armor is only meant to protect against autocannons. It is made of a type of composite armor which offers it exceptional resistance to HEAT weapons like missiles, rockets, and other shaped charge warheads. There are two types of protection of which modern armor provides, these are fundamental to understanding how these tanks work. There is Chemical Energy (CE), and Kinetic Energy (KE), the goal of most tanks is to achieve a good level of protection in both, but some tanks prioritize one over the other. Russian tanks generally have prioritized KE, while using ERA to make up for the lack of CE protection, while Israel prioritizes CE due to the large amount of urban operations and guerilla warfare that they face. There is no perfect analogy for them I think, but imagine them as two types of body armor. Imagine CE as a suit of Kevlar you wear to protect you from the most common threat of battlefield, shrapnel, the suit makes you safe from much artillery and grenades but you can still be shot and killed by rifle. KE is like body armor plates, it won't protect you from shrapnel but it protect you from bullets. The goal is to have both but is very hard because the are different and heavy.
I promise you M1E3 Abrams and the challenger 3 will be the best of the group.
Everyone was shitting on the French autoloader of the Leclerc but both projects of the German army (EMBT and Panther) use the exact same autoloader (for the panther it’s the same but built in Germany) and you know why ? Because it’s safer and faster than most of loaded (don’t explode like a t90 bc the ammo rack is in the turret, faster than a manual that close the safety door of the ammo because a manual loader can be faster but that’s very risky he don’t have the time to close the anti-explosion door)
It can't explode from a frontal or lateral armor hit, it can explode from a frontal or lateral turret hit. Blowout panels aren't magic, if the door sealing the ammo off is breached it's GG no Re.
Hmm, is there alternative physics in Europe? The T-90's ammunition is located at the bottom of the tank, in the most protected part of the hull. Placing them in a tower is anti-scientific; this is the most vulnerable position. Which, in addition, Western tanks have no armor. There are positions when they can be destroyed using a powerful gun.
Therefore, T-90s can survive a battle and return, but Leopards do not survive a battle.
@@MultiNike79 Ammo in T-90 is with the crew... one hit there and the whole tank and its crew is no more.
Hiting in the ammo in your "anti-scientific" example is just hitting the ammo and ofc the ammo can be lost because of it but not the whole tank or its crew...
And no the hull of T-90 is not well protected its many times crapier than the turret of that tank so you are simply inventing fake excusses for something that was done like that beace it was easy and cheap...
also hit into turret of T-90 have huge chance to start fire of that T-90 tank ammo!
@@Bialy_1 Man, you sound like an idealist. Do not do it this way.
There are hit statistics. It is extremely difficult to hit the T-90's ammunition; it can withstand almost a hundred hits without explosions. Even if it hits the ammunition, it does not light up immediately and the crew has time to leave the tank.
On the other hand: if a shell or mine hits a tank, then the crew will almost certainly be wounded or killed.
Also, the thin protection between the tower and the shells is weak. If the jet passes through the shells and reaches this armor, the crew will definitely be fried. But 80% of hits to a tank are hits to the turret. And the Leopards have no armor there at all.
Doesn't it bother you that 100% of Challenger 2s that were shot down threw the turret?
The T-90 hull has the best all-round protection among existing Western tanks (actually, except for the Leclerc - they cannot be considered tanks). It is a fact.
@@MultiNike79
There's one mistake: while you are correct that higher up = easier to hit, tanks have the heaviest armour on the turret front. Issue with most NAFO bots is they forget that the only tank with fully blowout panel protected ammo, Abrams, has horrifically bad top armour (30 mm RHA on the turret roof).
Where is the K2(Black panther)?
The video is about upcoming mbts. The K2 is in service
Merkava 5 no such things it's Barak 4M
Challenger 3. Fourth generation tank not 3rd
Till we make Altay there will be not much need to tanks maybe. Bevcause we dont have a proper engine yet😢 Lots of rumor no work😅
aRJUN MK2 💀WHO THE FUCK WOULD AGREE TO FIGHT IN THAT THING
same with Arjun lmao
A swarm of FPV drones will be happy to meet each of the presented samples.
Which would then be shot down by nearby anti drone systems.
@@Only1199 Keep believing in fairy tales! You should definitely become a tanker and make us all happy!
It is the only country that is seriously interested in KF51 and has invested money in the development. On the same day it signed the contract with Rheinmetall for the KF51, it ALSO ordered skyranger30 drone defense systems built on the KF41 chassis. Of course, it was agreed well in advance, half a year before signing the contract, he had already ordered mistral3 missiles (necessary for the skyranger) from the French manufacturer...
Anti drone vehicle and personnel are to be embedded with this Tank, Its not hard to spot drones now and this 4thgens have APS
@@dmitry9843 Keep believing in fairy tales yourself! You should definitely become a tanker for Ivan in Ukraine and make us all happy as well!
The problem with any vehicle or military is the area in which they’re primarily based in and most likely to deal with, such as the German leopard whilst the best armored tank out there, fight me in that, is mostly due to the leopard being designed to deal with large, open and primarily flat terrain, much like the British challenger 2 being idealistic in the open and hilly countrysides all the while being able to fight at longer ranges compared to its competitors, as for the AMX lecrerc, whilst its much lighter than its European counterparts it’s similar in the same ways as the Italian c1 ariete in the sense that France tends to be very mountainous as well as large and open, whilst being densely wooded, meaning that for the French and Italians and even the Russians army relies more on mobility over outright firepower or heavy armor, again just because a tank is better on paper doesn’t entirely mean that it’s better in actual combat, take the tiger as an example in which most people tend to laugh at British tanks for being unreliable but in actuality German tanks or heavy tanks were far far more unreliable than their British counterparts and in reality, British tanks were actually some of the most reliable tanks throughout the war, as for the myths of British unreliable tanks during ww2 was in part due to the terrible location and design of British tank engine filters, being primarily based at the back and to the sides of the tank, meaning that as the tank drove along, any and all dust clouds or particles would typically end up getting sucked back into the engine causing the tank to stall, again, tanks like the Matilda, Cromwell and Churchill all have outlasted most of their foreign counterparts, the only exceptions were the Sherman’s and the T34’s but that’s due in part to how cheap they were, tanks like the centurion and Churchill we’re extensively used all the way to Korea and in the case of the centurion, is even used to this day
The Leo2 A8 Prototype is not a A8 ...thats the Leo2 A7A1 that comes this year, there are no picctures of the A8 and no technical details avaible...so all technical claims are not real facts
yea, they showed 2A7+, 2A7V and 2A7A1 (Trophy testbed), also weird how Arjun Mk2 and Altay are 4th gen MBT but Chally 3 is 3rd gen lmao
excellent the buzz i love
Uhm our country is in fact not called "British", it's called "Britain"! 😁👍🇬🇧 Nice vid anyways, aside from the typo! 😅
only see, huge target for drones
All these tanks look amazing however England WTF are you doing?
Challenger 3 has been described as an "Interim tank" so who knows what they have planned.
The challenge 2 has the best armour in the world the British made chobham armour. It’s so good the Americans put it on there M1 Abrams.
@@thomaspickard4138 Hello, the British stole Chobham from the USSR, which was the first to create tanks with such armor. The British captured some Soviet tanks and copied their technology.
Specifically, Challenger 2 essentially has no armor, it’s like an elephant with a small shield on its chest - hunters don’t care about this shield. Are you surprised that 100% of the Challengers that were shot down threw their turrets?
@@MultiNike79 Do you have a historical source?
@@badwolf66 The T-64 was the first tank with combined armor, developed before the 1960s, and in the early 1960s the British began developing their Chobham.
In principle, the USSR did a huge amount of work on researching different types of armor, including, as far as we know, almost complete analogues of Chobham.
Considering that the USSR had drawings of Western tanks even before they were put on the assembly line, I think that there was also a reverse flow.
t14???
main cannon for what killing another tank? or destroying a fortification? why have a main gun instead you can launch missles or killer drones from an armored platform. tanks are not outdated but theiir canons do
They just Wikipediaed the hell out and made a video with open source pics. Nothing is new here and they even missed the coming joint Leopard-Leclerc one.
Do they all remain loaded manually?
Not the Leclerc
No, the Panther, M1E3, and Leclerc have an autoloader
They look cool but it's not gonna stop a missile flying at you and putting you out of the war still might save your life.
I don't think any modern ground vehicles can survive a missle
Thats the point of APS : destroy inbound missiles, some are powerfull enough to intercept some APFSDS rounds
@@Alpha1598753 what you saying the alphabet I have no idea what your saying just a bunch of letters to me .
@@fightingspirit-rl8xb APS : Active Protection System, a weapon system designed to automaticaly spot and shoot down projectiles that will impact the vehicle directly (Trophy system, ARENA, Iron Fist) or actively jam the controls of Anti tank guided missile via infrared signals (SHTORA aka the "red eyes" of the T-90)
APFSDS : Armor Piercing Fin Stabilised Discarding Sabot, the common non explosive anti tank round used by about all tanks nowadays
@@Alpha1598753 thank you I understand that much more.
Italian C2 Ariete?
I mean, he deserves it for this unibrow
Where is leopard X?
The only tank that could be build NOW and would work is the Panther. It uses the vehcile of the Leopard2 and the ability to replace the actual 1500HP engine by a 2500hp engine. The 130mm-gun is superior to anything else.
the NATO just should start to produce this tank, say 5000-1000 of them. So the price per unit will drop and all NATO states could switch to it.
Calling piles of crap like the Argun II 4th gen but the Challenger 3 3rd gen? wot.
Uhh I don’t think any of this would actually become future mbt to it country
Cost I mean
That's just a LeClerc with the AZUR package.
Есть пооблема. Они выглядят уж больно местически. Вы точно в серию их пустите. А то у многих возникают сомнения. Ладно т 14 армата, на него посмотриш и поймёш что такое построить можно. Но вот абромс... Зачем ебу во лбу корпуса какойто отсек с зарядной для планшета как будто?
Since Turkie is (still) in NATO its weapons will use NATO common rounds.
Regurgitated previous videos.
T-90 MS?
Where is the T-14 Armata
war thunder update looks promising
Well I guess they finally figured out the T-14 is not up and coming anymore. Russia has instead chosen to focus on their “new” T-62M’s 😂
Will go against the ancient technology of the Nazis.
@users-0 ruski copium
It isn’t better than just let a regular t62 out the battlefield? Beside they still have t80bvm and t90m
@@FinnisJaegerNew APFSDS introduced last year can penetrate 900mm of armour. There's no way leopard's UFP is tanking that and what's funny is that this ammunition works on any type of russian 125mm gun. And we didn't even start talking about the ATGMs.
@@georgeousthegorgeous lol. Claim made by ruski mod yes? I claim that my new apfsds model P.E.N can penetrate the whole kremlin twice.
Also you understand that the "newest" apfsds rounds developed by russia can only be usee by the turret bustle loader that they dont even have in active use.
The best tanks for the most cowardly armies!
You are bored because you havent seen grass?
Says the losing orc people 😂
The armies smart enough to make better equipment? huh
why they bringin the panther back
by the way nice video as always * but why Leopard and Arjun tanks looks so heavy
The Arjun is Indeed heavy as it is Similar to the T 90 tank of Russia, Arjun incorporates heavy Alloy armor compared to Depleted uranium armors of Western tanks, They're built to be rigid as India faces consistent conflicts with terrorist groups which primaly use RPGs and small arms
@@itz_me_kratos so it's more likely had armour to protect it from deep penetration weapons, but does it have counter measure system like Israel Merkava
no active trophy protection system yet.... but it does have standard counter measures like smoke discharge, 360 panoramic view@@sanasshushu3905
@@sanasshushu3905 Arjun isn't that good of a tank. It uses a rifle barrel. Which is being phased out by the British military and many other countries around the world today. The Germans, Americans and French. Moved away from the rifle barrel tank gun, during the late 80s. Another problem with arjun is the fact it doesn't even have its ammo sealed from the crew. The only tank that has all of its ammo stored away from the crew in active service, is the m1 abrams.
@@travismccraw6013 hmm ig I have to read about it's specifications than , it seems interesting cause if u saying is true than ig this tank is not much of a load for an enemy, but i can't say anything without learning about Arjun myself first
Hello Buzz 👋👋👋
Yeah yeah, The Americans are always the best, ever! They can't drive cars, but they make the best tanks.
No MGCS ??
And yet all of these will be destroyed by a 200 dollar rocket fired from a shoulder. 😂
Just one 155 mm proiectile of 5000 E and all are KAPUT , one drone of 20 000 E can KAPUT any of there tancks ...
Mentioning tanks and nothing from Russia? You must be kidding
...a lot of wrong info as allways on this channel.....
ФПВ-дроны стоимость в 1000$ уничтожат или выведут из строя любой из этих танков стоимостью в миллионы долларов.
And have you seen the new gadgets that will get rid of the drones that’s heading to Ukraine so drones will be less affected soon.
@@danbatesy5492 No, they will not do. Russian drones have self-nurturing. Europe will be free, the EU will be destroyed.
@@danbatesy5492 More tales about super weapons. I even feel a little sorry for you.
@@danbatesy5492
no weapon can save ukraine, not everything is about weapons its about how do you use it, look what happened for the merkavah in g.a.za
@@dmitry9843that’s right. Russian equipment is vastly superior to western equipment. They are the only country that can manufacture flying turrets.
wow making them even more MEAN
What about Armata or T90
Armada is is a propaganda tank and the t90 is the same as the T80 junk
@@HereNowOOO Let me correct him.
T14 is a propaganda tank and T90 is cosmetic skin tank.
@@HereNowOOO no not got to that rank yet. But got to ask why the t14 how long as it been going it’s been years and all it’s done is a parade and that broke down and why haven’t they put it on the battlefield?.
@@HereNowOOO he is usual nazy, propably Elensky pay for him.
Read the title of the video, neither of those are ‘forthcoming’.
The kf51 does not have an unmanned turret. At least for now.
i hope we wont see this mbts on the battlefields in the 2030s....
Where t14 armata
Je vais la traduction en arabe😊
Lazar gon tanke nat a el tank
The world is not limited to the West.
frog in the well
The Indian tank runs on human feces for fuel
The tank is dead they've all been saying, just watching this video tells you otherwise.
Since when "French" is a country ?
Now days tanks are meat target for ATGMs and drones as we have seen them in many conflicts
So?
Not a single destroyed Merkava within Gaza.
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel A modern army with tanks against guys in slippers
@@NickMaxwelll I like how cavemen starts a war and then play the victim card. "we don't have planes, we don't have tanks etc..". Deal with it
The Merkava is a good tank, but the Leopard turned out to be an unsuccessful tank, as the war in Ukraine showed. Unfortunately, Russia destroyed almost all the Leopard tanks that NATO supplied to Ukraine. We need good tanks like the Merkava.
german W
bullshit
The Americans and the British banned the Ukrainians from using their tanks because the hunt for the big German cats was over.Greta called for the rescue of Leopards from Ukraine
Moskva wasn't sunk, it just went to special submarine operation.
@@Tonius126 That's right. That old ship could sail, unlike the new British aircraft carriers that leaked water. If the English continue to behave arrogantly, England could be the new Atlantis.
@@draganbabic1030 Aunque me molesta tener que defender a los ingleses, el último tipo que penso eso, tenía un bigote gracioso y se pegó un tiro en un bunker.
Los que han perdido 2000 tanques en ucrania, son los rusos. Así que dejate de propaganda rusa y pon los pies en el suelo.
They protecting the sale value... But even the israel merkava doesnt survived from hamas modified rpg.. which is more powerfull from suicide drone..
@@JesusSanchez-ij5de You personally ran around the remnants of ukraine with a notepad and counted losses. You are even more ridiculous and useless than your president!
And , what about Russian Armata platform ? Which actually IS operational! Unlike the new Abrams and new ''Panther'' ...
Or Russia ,has been ''cancelled'', so Russian achievements would be ignored at will?
Really ?!?!
No proven to be operatonal in any theatre of war yet, but given that this video is about "planned" tanks the Armatar is alreeay done with it's development yes?
@@kieranholland1048 All the tanks listed here are still fantastic. The Armata was in production, but they decided to update it using the experience of fighting the Nazis. Presumably, there is nothing better than it.
@@MultiNike79 "but they decided to update it using the experience of fighting the Nazis." But Prigozhin stoped the march for justice before he reached Moscow and i do not think that Putin will be shooting with T-14 at himself...
Not to mention that the T-14 is a tank for Red Square parades and not for real combat!
@@Bialy_1 It’s scary that similar nonsense could be heard from Europeans 80 years ago. You commit crimes because you are completely inadequate and do not learn from your mistakes. Remember that Hitler also lied a lot, but he had to shoot himself when the Russians liberated Berlin.
@@kieranholland1048 MOSCOW, April 19. /TASS/. The T-14 tank on the heavy tracked vehicle platform has been tested in Syria, Russian Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov said on Sunday.
"Yes, that’s right. They [Armata tanks] were used in Syria," he said in an interview with the Deistvuyushchiye Litsa (Political Actors) with Nailya Asker-zade program on the Rossiya-1 television channel answering a corresponding question. "They were used in field conditions, in Syria, so, we took into account all the nuances."
Alexander Potapov, CEO of Uravagonzavod, the tank’s developer and manufacturer (incorporated into Rostec corporation), said in an interview with the Vedomosti daily on February 3 that first batches of Aramata tanks would be supplied to the Russian army in 2020 for field trials.
WAARRRGGGFARE😂
The NATO-Russia war in Ukraine has shown that the strategic effect of western tanks in modern warfare is not efficient and effective.
Et bla bla bla ,et ou ils sont les supers chars occidentaux en Ukraine ,la on découvre la realité ,un char sans le contrôle des air n'est rien 😂
🫡🪖⚓️⚓️⚓️🇷🇺
Merkava tank is the best.
🤣
@@MrRoninGT Are you laughing at Russian tanks when take 1 hit the turret flies 90ft into the air?
They should come up with something new and/or ditch the hybrid style it is and rethink the engine positioning as it does not offer the protection against modern rounds. Also the mobility begings to be issue.. turret is great, the hull not so much.
@@Tedger Almost all of those videos you see in the Arab media of "successful" RPG hits on Merkava's and Namers are in fact successful Trophy interceptions exploding the missiles before even reaching the vehicles.
The only videos of actually destroyed tanks were the ones from the 7th of October that weren't even manned in most cases, or were hit by a drone or of tanks that weren't prepped for combat.
@@IsraelMilitaryChannel dude dont fool us, the trophy system is useless when someone hit the tank from closer range.
Chinese tank is poor quality. Leaks oil and poor cameras
As for Western tanks, they have an extremely outdated design relevant to the 1970s.
The idea then was that 40,000 Soviet tanks would attack, supported by hundreds of nuclear bombs in the breakthrough zone. And Western tanks had to hide in the folds of the terrain, fire a few shots and run away while aviation destroyed the civilian population of the USSR. Therefore, they have a heavy forehead and almost zero armor on the sides (they are not designed for attacks), and huge sizes.
However, the advent of drones and battle design optimized for the Russian army turned all Western tanks into simply bad self-propelled guns. High altitude, low mobility, lack of armor, a gun with an effective firing radius 1.5 times smaller than that of Russian tanks - it is not surprising that the German government is now crying - Scholz and Merkel have worse situations than Hitler, but the sins are the same.
The only exception is Leclerc, but it is extremely low-tech. Russia is capable of producing several dozen times more similar tanks.
lol NO Dude esp. the Lie about NATO Bombing USSR Civilians
@@JAGtheTrekkieGEMINI1701 Are you not aware that the main dream of European leaders is to destroy all Russians? Haven’t you heard about Hitler, Mannerheim, Churchill? Plan "The Unthinkable"? Why do Americans need so many bombers in Europe? Romanian, Hungarian, French, Spanish, Czech, Danish, Swedish leaders who publicly declared the need to exterminate all Russians?
That there is an active genocide of Russians going on right now? Yes, it is post-modern, it includes serious brainwashing, but if we accept that Ukrainians are Russians deprived of the right to vote and freedom, then how does the phrase sound that “the war will go on until the last Ukrainian”? Open anti-Russian Nazism of current Europe? Non-compliance with treaties by Europeans? Don’t you see that Europeans and Ukrainian leaders treat the residents of Donbass and Crimea literally, like cockroaches? Complete ignorance of their suffering?
Europe is pure evil, think with your head and use facts for this.
All tanks are designed with heavy forward armor. Including Soviet/Russian tanks. That is why the Javelin anti-tank missile is designed with a top attack option.
As far as drones go, Russian tanks seem to be every bit as vulnerable to drone attacks as any other. Russia’s biggest problem is they suck at combined operations. That is why they have lost so many tanks in Ukraine.
When it comes to bombing civilian targets, Russia has no problem at all with killing civilians.
The T-72 is a 1970s design and the T-90 is really just a T-72 with slightly newer electronics. The T-80 is based on the T-64 which is a 1960s design.
Pin first
😂🤡
Russian tanks are good
Don't say the truth, they'll cancel you
You're funny...😂You must be joking,little man from ruSSia🤣
Yeah they fare well in turret tossing contest.
@@maciekmadmax or one of their client states
@@HereNowOOODon't really need words. You can go look at video and photo evidence of destroyed Russian tanks.
Waste of money on modern battlefields, drones and artillery are kings.
You don’t have a clue right ? 🙂 Attack helis and at rockets can destroy a mbt since 30 years… all depend on the tactics of infantry position and mobilization. Play chess 🙏
You have no understanding of a modern battlefield
Russia will fight on bikes? 🤣🤣🤣
Where is the EMBT?