Bruce Robinson @ 5x15 - They All Love Jack: Busting the Ripper

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @jharkinsmedia1790
    @jharkinsmedia1790 4 роки тому +10

    Bruce is fantastic. I love listening to him in conversation, at events like this.

  • @TheDharr
    @TheDharr 7 років тому +26

    Superb book. I was stunned by it. Robinson should be applauded.

    • @BlackCat-we5eg
      @BlackCat-we5eg 7 років тому

      paul harris but he seems confused and confusing

    • @duneideannaer5990
      @duneideannaer5990 5 років тому +1

      I got this book from fiancée for my birthday after begging her to get me it. I’d watched his interview in Jaipur book festival video and was taken away! I’ve still yet to read it. I’m waiting for my stomach to gain strength lol. Paul Harris is it worth the wait?..........

    • @cianpritchard1961
      @cianpritchard1961 2 роки тому

      @@duneideannaer5990 I think it’s worth waiting. Even if he is confusing, you can learn so much in his complexion. Almost a conspiracy of bafflement, the confusion of its confinements. He’s a great guy to listen to.

  • @normanmorrow4897
    @normanmorrow4897 4 місяці тому

    Absolutely terrific book. Great watch.

  • @stevesandford1437
    @stevesandford1437 4 роки тому +6

    Bruce Robinson is a REAL (eccentric) genius. xx SF

  • @nigelcarren
    @nigelcarren 4 роки тому +3

    Re 'Curry': Bruce, if ever you have the misfortune to find yourself in France, please look me up. In 2008 I went on holiday by mistake and I am still here. I can think of no better dinner guest and I can cook the best Chicken Shaslik and mushroom-pilau known to all humanity... I am happy to pay for alllllll the booze. Bless you 🏆🇬🇧

  • @of1300
    @of1300 2 роки тому +2

    best book ever written on the case. so much new information you have never read about.

  • @terrycollett603
    @terrycollett603 4 роки тому +2

    I have this book twice and will read it again. Classic

  • @geofftayloruk
    @geofftayloruk 8 років тому +10

    Incredible book...

  • @romeaffair
    @romeaffair 7 років тому +4

    Reading this at the moment. Pretty convincing so far.

  • @davidraleigh4552
    @davidraleigh4552 4 роки тому +3

    Stunning book.

  • @KirstyKing-v7y
    @KirstyKing-v7y 11 місяців тому

    All your hard work points the finger in the right way !! And yet no one will prove it ? I have watched this video over and over again infatuated years of hard work should prove your point I have read story’s around the same time and they add up if anyone adds different stories up that same year I promise you you’ll hear a similar story

  • @NoPainNoGain200
    @NoPainNoGain200 7 років тому +1

    It took me 15 years.." we were both bum boys at the back" in Romeo and Juliet 1968...

  • @chriskapinos8734
    @chriskapinos8734 2 роки тому

    Incredible book. I couldn't put it down. Wish it were longer, to be honest. Lol. Knowing what I now know, it all makes perfect sense . I've no reason to suspect Mr. Robinson has any ulterior motives for his conclusions.

    • @jamescorlett5272
      @jamescorlett5272 2 роки тому

      No no Only a Hollywood film with the American slant .

  • @carmichael3594
    @carmichael3594 7 місяців тому

    Love his book. I won't touch the ripperligist book's bit Robinsons definitely a great read

  • @AngryBlackDogger
    @AngryBlackDogger 8 місяців тому

    Michael Maybrick was performing on Thursday night 8 november in Redhill Surrey. Mary Jane Kelly was murdered that night, 8 november - 9 november. How could Michael have done that if he was performing that night? Honest question.

  • @AngryBlackDogger
    @AngryBlackDogger Рік тому

    Did Maybrick ever confessed or said something about being the Ripper?

  • @hollandproductions4813
    @hollandproductions4813 3 роки тому

    i don't want to take any credit, but I'm sad that I only figured this out today without this book when I didnt know someone had already figured out what I figured out 6 years ago

  • @billyellis4670
    @billyellis4670 3 роки тому +1

    Stephen knight already said about being ritually laid out victims.

    • @sidmicheals9739
      @sidmicheals9739 2 роки тому

      and your point is what? Bruce already knows this...indeed they may have been ritualistic but the source that told Stephen the killer may have had royal blood was done so as misinformation. Bruce didn't steal this notion he just came to a similar conclusion.

  • @ULYSSES-31
    @ULYSSES-31 6 років тому +3

    It was Alan Moore & Eddie Campbell who explored the Masonic ritualisation of the murders in the comic From Hell. That should be acknoloedged. The idea didn't come out of nowhere.

    • @meninpapin
      @meninpapin 4 роки тому +5

      Actually it was Stephen knight, Jack the Ripper :The final solution during the mid 70's. Alan Moore 's graphic novel is based on the book implicating the Queens doctor sir William Gull in the murders with his accomplices

    • @duneideannaer5990
      @duneideannaer5990 4 роки тому +1

      The Royal myth sold as ‘revelatory evidence’, was given to Stephen Knight to discredit him & make an example of anyone who wanted to solve the identity. Warding off anyone who would dare ‘Out’ a Freemason or as I call ‘em -“Lodgers”. That book ruined Mr Knight’s career as an (credible)author.
      Bonus fun fact: In light of some of the above, there has only been one Motion picture that has been anywhere near accurate. And that’s the Alfred Hitchcock movie from the 1920’s. Accurate in being that he titled the movie -The Lodger. There Endith the truth.

  • @NoPainNoGain200
    @NoPainNoGain200 7 років тому

    There was a technique: not a crucifix... the book is not about the ripping of the guts

  • @shanegrant8441
    @shanegrant8441 3 роки тому

    Maybrick was either queen Victoria son or grandson look at the likeness of queen Victoria husband

  • @jimmyjohnston8287
    @jimmyjohnston8287 6 років тому +1

    Chanty rassler.

  • @jimmyjohnston8287
    @jimmyjohnston8287 6 років тому +3

    Looks like 'Richard Dawkins'.

    • @Stantheman848
      @Stantheman848 3 роки тому +2

      Luckily he was not thick like dawkins

  • @357lockdown
    @357lockdown 2 роки тому

    I see the JTR case in a whole new light after reading Mr. Robinson's book. What a wonderful piece of research he put in.

    • @rizmark5522
      @rizmark5522 2 роки тому +1

      He read Stephan Knight and then went off on his own tangent!

    • @sidmicheals9739
      @sidmicheals9739 2 роки тому

      @@rizmark5522
      nah he didnt.
      Knights theory is easy to rip apart
      Bruce merely points out that he was correct about parts of his theory

    • @rizmark5522
      @rizmark5522 2 роки тому

      ​@@sidmicheals9739 I know whaT he means, Ive had trouble with that group too.

    • @sidmicheals9739
      @sidmicheals9739 2 роки тому +1

      @@rizmark5522
      erm ok?

    • @rizmark5522
      @rizmark5522 2 роки тому

      @@sidmicheals9739 Hes constantly swearing and talking politics and other topics nothing to do with JTR, its annoying.

  • @Steven-ze2zk
    @Steven-ze2zk 4 роки тому

    Lechmere.