Banging Up a Beamer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @neilshipton2887
    @neilshipton2887 6 днів тому +17

    I want to say well done to the plaintiff. The defendant will never let anyone slide in good faith again.

  • @lauraanne5175
    @lauraanne5175 6 днів тому +17

    Never have I ever met a BMW owner who is not a complete douche.

    • @g-mang-man7924
      @g-mang-man7924 6 днів тому +1

      Remember, even turn signals are optional. Especially as the BMW's weave lane to lane through traffic

    • @bonniemchugh1542
      @bonniemchugh1542 6 днів тому +1

      😂😂😂my favorite word😂

    • @mimim8532
      @mimim8532 6 днів тому

      😂😂😂😂😂 ohh good one! I needed a laugh!

    • @mimim8532
      @mimim8532 6 днів тому

      @@bonniemchugh1542ditto!😂

    • @runningawayvagabond5876
      @runningawayvagabond5876 3 дні тому

      That 100% used to be the case. Now all the douche bag BMW 3 series (you know, the cheap one) drivers who thought they were special snowflakes are driving Tesla Model 3's (you know, the cheap one). Apparently we should be impressed by $40-50k cars? Doubly so when the soccer mom sitting beside them at a red light is diving a $100k+ luxury SUV? Or Joe Sixpack who's driving an $80k super duty pickup pulling a trailer with a $30k side by side on it to get away for the weekend?

  • @HHH-ye1ro
    @HHH-ye1ro 7 днів тому +25

    Wow, the plaintiff was such a dope. He didn’t have anything ready. What was he thinking?

    • @Hazel.Eyed.Gemini
      @Hazel.Eyed.Gemini 7 днів тому +9

      BMW owners are that way. They feel extra special

    • @SuperKpill
      @SuperKpill 6 днів тому +1

      He probably lied

    • @slosauss
      @slosauss 6 днів тому

      Yeah absolutely ridiculous! Who does he think he is? 🙄

    • @lauraanne5175
      @lauraanne5175 6 днів тому

      @@Hazel.Eyed.Gemini 100!!!!!

  • @BrianValley-me6bg
    @BrianValley-me6bg 7 днів тому +26

    Invalid or expired tags on a vehicle gives cause for the tow.

    • @kyoto32001
      @kyoto32001 6 днів тому +1

      he never sued for tow, he sued for damage.

    • @DonziGT230
      @DonziGT230 6 днів тому +1

      Not always.

    • @lukerinderknecht2982
      @lukerinderknecht2982 6 днів тому +1

      ​@@kyoto320017:08 he was also suing for a vehicle inspection after the tow

    • @AnikaBren
      @AnikaBren 6 днів тому

      I do not believe that is true on private property.

    • @BrianValley-me6bg
      @BrianValley-me6bg 6 днів тому

      @AnikaBren unless it's stipulated in the enforcement clause in the contract

  • @slosauss
    @slosauss 6 днів тому +5

    All court shows should be like the people’s court! It’s the only way! PERIOD!

  • @catherinesisk4369
    @catherinesisk4369 6 днів тому +2

    I saw one yesterday where the landlord was the defendant, didn't have pictures and only her boyfriend who was her witness said it cost 600 bucks to clean. THEY WON. The plaintiff was more believable and the defendant was even caught lying about the witness being her boyfriend. JM needs to be consistent.

  • @shelberz1
    @shelberz1 5 днів тому +1

    Tow Manager was quite prepared:)

  • @FirstCityRecords
    @FirstCityRecords 7 днів тому +6

    Defendant seems ….high 😂

  • @MALAINASCOTT
    @MALAINASCOTT 6 днів тому +1

    Has the plaintiff never owned a car? Over a month expired tags thinking he can go another few months riding with them expired. All he had to do was go back to dealership to get renewed temp tags until he could register the vehicle.

  • @lukerinderknecht2982
    @lukerinderknecht2982 6 днів тому +3

    9:27 is he trying to say tie-down hooks are special to BMWs, Porsches, Jaguar, etc? My Mazda has those 😅

  • @bryanhenderson9637
    @bryanhenderson9637 6 днів тому +1

    I don't have a problem with the tow, I have a problem with the damage caused by the tow. Just because you tow the vehicle, you are responsible for not damaging the vehicle. I have to wonder, how would the plaintiff have proven his case even with pictures? Pictures would have shown the damage, but as JM said, the damage could have happened the previous day.

  • @stevelozano9523
    @stevelozano9523 6 днів тому +1

    Because they were pre-existing damage.

  • @christopherbako
    @christopherbako 4 дні тому

    Mr. Fancy Pants.

  • @thankthelord4536
    @thankthelord4536 5 днів тому +1

    JM looks old here.

  • @zaurtrien
    @zaurtrien 7 днів тому +2

    finally the one thats not harvey likes someone

  • @PlugJh
    @PlugJh 7 днів тому +8

    FIRST!!!! 😂!! The plaintiff is trying to pull a fast one!! I can see right threw his bull 💩!

  • @sherrihurt8383
    @sherrihurt8383 6 днів тому

    Defendant is a liar. Property owner does not get find for expired tags.

    • @queenlauraa3968
      @queenlauraa3968 6 днів тому +2

      It’s different everywhere you live 😂

    • @LIVEINPEACE2023
      @LIVEINPEACE2023 6 днів тому +1

      The judge said it first so I guess she’s a liar too?!

  • @Camo.Connoisseur
    @Camo.Connoisseur 6 днів тому +2

    And that's a blonde for you folks😅 "it shouldn't have been there for 4 years"
    ..😮..

    • @lauraanne5175
      @lauraanne5175 6 днів тому +1

      and that's a misogynistic comment for you

    • @Camo.Connoisseur
      @Camo.Connoisseur 6 днів тому

      @lauraanne5175 maybe if she wasn't in the audience watching the fkn court case...🥱

  • @jourdanrene8807
    @jourdanrene8807 7 днів тому +22

    Holy crap I’m never first! Hope everyone is having a blessed evening ❤

  • @Speakingthetruth2024
    @Speakingthetruth2024 3 дні тому +1

    And the plaintiff is your Kamala voter