I love this series and I'm genuinely shocked that they have so few views. There needs to be more public health workers and more health education in general! Thank you so much for the video.
Because the caduceus is improperly used in America instead of the rod of Asclepius. Why? No idea but we can speculate. The caduceus is a spiritual symbol for awakening or wisdom, it is the same symbol used for kundalini and the chakras. Ancient and modern alchemists worship Hermes along with the emerald tablet. Either an ignorant accident by medical intellectuals or a deliberate identification with this symbol over the other. Also the caduceus is also a symbol of commerce; befitting of American healthcare.
Welp. You are correct -- we definitely used the wrong staff in the thumbnail. Thanks for pointing this out Matthew! We've updated this but it may take a bit to show up in your browser. - brandon
great that this video emphasizes on systemic issues behind bad healthcare,like even high income like us has healthcare problem because of their systemic healthcare problem or ignorance of it's essentialness.
giving away food or low cost food has been proven to destroy local industries that can't compete. One of the greatest ways to slow a nation's development.
At 9:00-10:00 of the video, if you want a simple explanation, look up "Why did Haiti and the Dominican Republic Break Up?" by History Matters. It's simple and gets straight to the point, I hope it helps.
If "global health" includes an emphasis on eliminating health equity gaps in gender, then necessarily, "national/regional/local health" must _de-_ emphasize eliminating health equity gaps in gender. Otherwise that wouldn't be part of the explanation of the term "global health", since the gender distribution is notably homogenous globally (unlike e.g. income). Of course, this is absurd, and we should be concerned with gender inequity at _all_ levels of geographic scope; I'm just pointing out the absurdity of being so married to an agenda that you need to shove that agenda into definitions of terms willy-nilly so that they become less meaningful, and therefore less useful for scientific discourse. You're doing students a disservice by broadening specific topics into a soup of things that sound morally good, instead of having terms clearly defined by what they both include and exclude.
As a Global Health advisor at a University, this is very helpful in explaining what it is to our students!
I love this series and I'm genuinely shocked that they have so few views. There needs to be more public health workers and more health education in general! Thank you so much for the video.
We are blessed to have crash course which provides more information than our school does! Thank you for enlightening our brains!
This channel deserves way more views. Keep up the great videos.🙏🙏
Why'd you use the Caduceus instead of the Rod of Asclepius in the thumbnail?
Because the caduceus is improperly used in America instead of the rod of Asclepius.
Why? No idea but we can speculate.
The caduceus is a spiritual symbol for awakening or wisdom, it is the same symbol used for kundalini and the chakras. Ancient and modern alchemists worship Hermes along with the emerald tablet.
Either an ignorant accident by medical intellectuals or a deliberate identification with this symbol over the other.
Also the caduceus is also a symbol of commerce; befitting of American healthcare.
Came to say this. Seems like Crash Course could help with that education.
Welp. You are correct -- we definitely used the wrong staff in the thumbnail. Thanks for pointing this out Matthew! We've updated this but it may take a bit to show up in your browser. - brandon
Thanks, this will help in my Health and Hygiene exam
Last left before graduation
great that this video emphasizes on systemic issues behind bad healthcare,like even high income like us has healthcare problem because of their systemic healthcare problem or ignorance of it's essentialness.
"Health is a human right".
[American] conservatives: lolwut.
amazing mam , thorough research and message of oneness , belongings , we say here in INDIA "VASUDHAIVA KUTUMBAKAM " the world is our family .
So, informative! You have a new subscriber!
giving away food or low cost food has been proven to destroy local industries that can't compete. One of the greatest ways to slow a nation's development.
thank you so much for talking about Haiti. their resources were consistently stolen. 😥
Getting thru that Haiti portion w/o using the word "imperialism" or "neo-colonialism" was a choice lol.
Or slavery
We indian Hindus believe in vasudevam khutumbham ... Whole world is our family...🇮🇳🧡🚩👑
Thank you for changing the thumbnail!
How does the WHO feel about Taiwan joining?
I'm so old I have a scar from my smallpox vaccination.
The only nation and self there is, is the universe and beyond
That doesn't make any sense.
At 9:00-10:00 of the video, if you want a simple explanation, look up "Why did Haiti and the Dominican Republic Break Up?" by History Matters. It's simple and gets straight to the point, I hope it helps.
Thank you!
Cheers
Shakira Shakiraaaaaa
Edit: I think I hallucinated the Whenever Wherever reference...
such as: B. Even high-income people like us have health problems because of their systemic health problems or ignorance of the need.
If you want to sell your social credits or carbon credits in Canada you can buy health credits but at a 10% green charge.
Enough of that conspiracy theory rubbish.
Of all the CC series this one seems like it's more geared toward children ... that's just me though .
Why $
This series propagates the myth that the USA has Healthcare.
first yes
✔☺
let's go, first comment
First!
1
If "global health" includes an emphasis on eliminating health equity gaps in gender, then necessarily, "national/regional/local health" must _de-_ emphasize eliminating health equity gaps in gender. Otherwise that wouldn't be part of the explanation of the term "global health", since the gender distribution is notably homogenous globally (unlike e.g. income).
Of course, this is absurd, and we should be concerned with gender inequity at _all_ levels of geographic scope; I'm just pointing out the absurdity of being so married to an agenda that you need to shove that agenda into definitions of terms willy-nilly so that they become less meaningful, and therefore less useful for scientific discourse. You're doing students a disservice by broadening specific topics into a soup of things that sound morally good, instead of having terms clearly defined by what they both include and exclude.