Honestly I thought about this deck and I’m looking to run horizon stone to take that colorless that I don’t use and stuff it into a storage case essentially. I don’t wanna run the deck as if I always get the artifact but I feel it would add a nice touch especially in the early game if I don’t can’t use the mana she gives straight away
Like other formats, I dislike how powercreep from FIRE design, Commander products, and straight-to-Modern sets have homogenized decks. Specifically, I find the most prevalent combos like Thoracle and Breach lines to be quite boring. That said, there is NO COMPARISON between cEDH and the 60-card 1v1 formats; there's actual fun to be had in cEDH and my complaints are minor.
I actually think the cedh meta is quite good right now. Theres no single oppressive deck / strategy and you can still very regularly pull off wins with unique strategies. I mainly play Nath of the Gilt Leaf and it has a positive win rate.
Honestly I thought about this deck and I’m looking to run horizon stone to take that colorless that I don’t use and stuff it into a storage case essentially. I don’t wanna run the deck as if I always get the artifact but I feel it would add a nice touch especially in the early game if I don’t can’t use the mana she gives straight away
Any opinions on the cedh meta? I'm not the biggest fan of it personally but I'm curious to see other competitive players perspectives on it.
Like other formats, I dislike how powercreep from FIRE design, Commander products, and straight-to-Modern sets have homogenized decks. Specifically, I find the most prevalent combos like Thoracle and Breach lines to be quite boring.
That said, there is NO COMPARISON between cEDH and the 60-card 1v1 formats; there's actual fun to be had in cEDH and my complaints are minor.
I actually think the cedh meta is quite good right now. Theres no single oppressive deck / strategy and you can still very regularly pull off wins with unique strategies. I mainly play Nath of the Gilt Leaf and it has a positive win rate.