Gwyneth Paltrow's Ski Instructor: 'Male Skier Took Her Out From Behind'
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
- The ski instructor who accompanied Gwyneth Paltrow and her children on the slopes the day she collided with Terry Sanderson reported that a "male skier took her out from behind" after the crash. Eric Christiansen reiterated that he did not see the crash but based on his observations, he believes Sanderson hit Paltrow from behind.
#GwynethPaltrow #SkiTrial #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on UA-camTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandC...
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.co...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK UA-cam CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
His testimony is the best I've heard so far. Many people have commented, on videos, about Sanderson sustaining broken ribs, head injury and he had to have fallen forward. That's ludicrous because an object slamming into something in front of it, going on a downward with a base such as long skis, would fall backwards not forwards. Although not on a slope picture bowling pins (candlepin) with the fast-moving bowling ball (the small ones) hitting the pins, they fall forward or sideways, not so much backwards. They fall in the direction of where impacted. His testimony and GP's makes so much more sense. I think Sanderson's one blind eye, one eye with cataracts, his skiing fast and in wide arcs, all makes sense that he would have slammed into her.
I completely agree!!! I have not bought his story at all!! I have said before she would have NEVER brought this court if it was her fault. She doesn’t have time to waste with her busy life. She is a sweet person beautiful lady and a good momma!! ❤️
His testimony best because you already believe her that is why. People lie even on murder case to help friends or family.
@@Aboma2012 No. In fact, I didn't want to believe her because she doesn't come across as a very down-to - earth person, but that would be prejudicial. Personality quirks aside, listening with my gut, and logic, and being able to read people quite well, his story is illogical. As well as my gut is simply not believing his story. I think he had health and cognitive issues that escalated over time and he really has a hard time accepting it and would rather blame anything other than himself for it. Sanderson, that is.
@@Aboma2012 Of course people lie all the time even when they "promise to tell the truth, the whole truth...". Do you believe the plaintiff's witnesses/friends/family are not lying/stretching things a bit to fit his narrative?
@@Aboma2012 "His testimony best because you already believe her that is why. People lie even on murder case to help friends or family." You mean like when Craig Ramon lied for his friend Terry Sanderson:
Ramon: Then Eric said "Gwyneth Paltrow just took out your buddy.
Sanderson's Attorney: I'm sorry he said what?
Ramon: He said "Gwyneth Paltrow just took out your buddy."
Sanderson's Attorney: "oh your buddy took out Gwyneth Paltrow?"
Ramon: No, uh
Sanderson's Attorney: What did Christiansen say?
Paltrow's Attorney: Your honor, let's make sure the witness is testifying and not the lawyer
Sanderson's Attorney: I will rephrase ...
Sanderson's Attorney: What did you hear at that scene at that time in this excited condition? What did you hear and from whom?
Ramon: Well well he told me that "Gwyneth Paltrow...Eric told me that Gwyneth Paltrow took out Terry.
Sanderson's Attorney: Gwyneth Paltrow took out Terry (unhappily)
Ramon: Yes
Sanderson's Attorney: Okay, was he accusing Terry of taking out Gwyneth Paltrow too
Ramon: No
Sanderson's Attorney: Okay, alright (unhappily)
Of course, Paltrow's lawyer during cross called him out on his testimony, under oath, during his deposition where he said the exact opposite and which Sanderson's lawyer was trying to coach him to say under oath now. The problem with Sanderson's witnesses and accounts is that they are not only inconsistent with reality, common sense and simple facts but they are contradictory internally and against each other. The account that Craig Ramon gave of what happened not only didn't match what he testified to during his sworn deposition but also his testimony at trial conflicted with itself and you could tell that he was giving descriptions of what happened to Paltrow and not to Sanderson and became confused as a result. That's also why he insisted here that the resort employee said "Gwyneth Paltrow just took out your buddy." Even as Sanderson's own lawyer kept trying to get him to say that the resort employee accused Sanderson of taking out Paltrow.
Best video to get clean of UA-cam addiction. You just reach that point of truly and thoroughly understanding that there are better things to do in life.
Lol.... So this is like one for the road?
Im sure that if Gwyneth hit him and felt that it was her fault she'd just pay him, their's no reason why she would put herself through this , because she definitely has the money and from what I've seen of her and her over all personality she doesn't seem the type of person that would lie about something like this. I believe she would take the responsibility of it, if she felt she was at fault.
Agree 100%!! Sanderson is at fault!! The ski instructor stated he saw Sanderson up hill right before the crash!! He asked if they were okay. They all said they were OK but sore. Then he saw them all ski down the hill. He was the last one to leave the scene. This is the best testimony along with Gwyneth Paltrow’s!! They are the most accurate and trust worthy!! Mr Sanderson should not be on the slopes with being blind in one eye. And going blind in the other!!
@@stephmartin1148 you are spamming the same quote so fast you aren't even reading to find if the post says she was at fault.
@@stephmartin1148 i guess you didn't understand my comment, im saying that she didn't hit him, that it's obviously his fault...
You are 100% wrong. Someone could believe they are at fault and still don’t want to pay something. More to do with a person’s personality and not their ability to pay financially.
Oh your sure, haha! Do you know her?
Are all these lawyers ill? What is with the coughing, tissues, sneezing?😬😷
Our air quality sucks. Also, they are at a high elevation, and combined with the cold and dryness here, they may be having a reaction to the changes. They may not be used to it.
This is exhausting!! These lawyers are so bad, they should be paying!!
Plaintiffs who took the case are ambulance chasers. Hers are fine. It's just a ridiculous lawsuit considering the argument will ultimately come down to "he hit me" vs "she hit me" so what do you expect?
Her lawyer is horrible. He's got all the evidence going his way yet he's constantly leading the witness and using hearsay.
So right! The only competent lawyer is the 2nd chair for the defendant... the only one who wrote down his questions and does not go sideways!
😂😂😂
I have a feeling if you drove around Utah you would see the lawyers in this case on giant advertising billboards
After watching the Murdaugh trial, ALL of these lawyers act like novices. Why is Paltrow's lawyer always smirking and squinting?
He looks like he’s fighting a cold or something and maybe that’s why he’s pausing…🤔…
What planet is he on?
This guy comes off most genuine. I believe him.
I don't bc in the other video he said he was watching gp but how was he doing that and teaching the kids
@@emilyheather328 your confused , timing off . he bye far is the most convincing , dr dentists were not good.
Agree with you. He's got nothing to gain and everything to lose if he lies.
He had contradictions in his testimony. And he didn't see the collision happen. He had to make a point to the eyewitness, Ramone that "your buddy just took out Gwyneth Paltrow"
Like that was really important??? To whom??? Himself ?
Would he have said your buddy just took out Jane Doe?? Doubt it.
Celebrity status matters to him it appears. And he didn't even witness the impact, so he probably should not have said that.
@@paddlefoot5692 Sanderson is the king of contradictions in this trial. And apparently, he didn't see the collision as well. Establishing who Sanderson hit is important to this witness because they were his responsibility at the time.
Bottom line is 300k is nothing to GP.
Why would she risk being shown as a liar in court for such an innocuous accident.
Gwyneth gets my vote 👍
I agree this guy thought she would pay him off. I admit I don’t like Gwyneth but I dislike frivolous lawsuits more.
Because she did nothing wrong. Terry Sanderson is clearly a fraud.
@@tiffinyanderson4403 same
Not a fan of Gwyneth at all and so actually started watching this thinking a celebrity would have to answer for bad behavior. After watching this for a short while, I was on Team Gwyneth. I didn’t like Terry Sanderson and I didn’t believe him at all. He looked like an opportunist.
This witness is eminently believable.
@@paindepices6793 Witness admits he turned his head away at the moment of impact which would also lead to the "tells" you mention - FYI.
@@Knucklehead123 correct without a witness they got 100% which is just not justifyable
@@KingCrimson82 Sorry buddy - Cannot understand your reply. Are you a human being or AI?
Not sure why Christiansen did not make it clear that when skiing side to side, if a collision occurs and the skis overlap, the entangled persons flip and/or row, which can result in both facing the opposite direction, and the lead person in front may be on top. What puzzles me is the Doc was blind in one eye and had major vision loss from cataracts in the other eye at the time of the accident, and he decided to take up skiing. And today I find out he has multiple personalities. Is this guy auditioning for Hollywood?
and he comes in many sizes lol
It's clear Gwyneth is telling the truth. This ski instructor has no reason to lie. When he filed that accident report, he had no idea the guy would sue years later. He just reported the accident like he's required to do. Everyone else has a reason to lie. He does not. He was just doing his job.
@@robinjustice4311 good point
@@user-ef5id9km3p Also if the instructor was going to lie why wouldn't he say he saw the impact instead of just saying he saw the direct aftermath?
@@robinjustice4311 "No reason to lie" BS. He was directly employed by the ski hill to work with her that day. That hill is also a favorite of the hollywood elite. Don't think for a minute that this guy is impartial when the hill makes a fortune catering to the right crowd.
I think if she hit him fr she would’ve handled this out of court honestly I don’t see why she would put herself through this if she for a fact hit him if fr
SHE CANT BE KNOWN FOR CAUSING THE BREAKING BONES & PERMANENT BRAIN DAMAGE OF AN ELDERLY OLD PENSIONER- THATS WHY SHES FIGHTING IT. ITD RUIN HER REPUTATION AND CAREER IN HOLLYWOOD . SHE MAY WELL BE GUILTY. SHES ACCUSED OF PAYING OFF PEOPKE - AND LOOK HOW RAMON FINALLY CHANGES HIS STORY AT THE END !!!
He saw it was Gwyneth Paltrow and said you know what I'm going to get paid!
These lawyers are a JOKE😂
I'm pretty sure the victims of war and tornadoes are riveted to this tragedy 😂😂😂
Exactly! This is trivial b.s. waste of taxpayers money. There are more real events occurring ... war, tornados, earthquakes ... etc.
Yes indeed......
I look in occasionally & can't believe how ludicrous this actually is.
Instructor certifies he didn’t see the incident.
However he would have seen if Mr. Sanderson was in front of them since they were going down together at roughly the same time, and given Mr. Ramone was also behind them, the rational scenario would have Mr. Sanderson just in front of his buddy, and Paltrow's group would have been in front of them. It makes very little sense for Paltrow's group be sandwiched between Sanderson and Ramone.
@@Ilicet It is possible but he wrote in log that he didn’t see accident. When the only known witness says GP hit TS I don’t know what more there is. If it was me I wouldn’t be suing as ski accidents are part of skiing.
@@TheRotorhound The odds of Sanderson being that far ahead of his friend, and no one else seeing Sanderson in front of Paltrow's group is very low. The only logical way it could have played out where Paltrow hit him from behind is if he cut right in front of her and slowed down. Also, if her back is hurt, and his ribs are hurt, that would could be directly correlated to a car accident where one person has front bumper damage and the other has rear bumper damage.
The guy was all over with different tales. I would trust the ski instructor as it's his job to be observant.
Observant of who he is instructing, the child skiing below him. Not the man uphill. He said himself one should not be looking uphill on a ski slope, always down.
So the other skiers should just stay blind?
This guy contradicted everything GP claimed.
Maybe, or he was just trying to get a big tip from the celebrity, lol, no one seems to have any evidence. I can’t stand Paltrow if it does sound like Sanderson is just looking for some cash from a celebrity
I don't believe this guy bc he said he seen Terry uphill sking but how did he do that when he was teaching the kids downhill. He has eyes in the back of his head 🤣 also he said he seen gp sking but according to there own map they were on two different sides of the run which means his head would have been turned backwards to see them both and yet he was still teaching the kids. Also if you work at a place like that you should check on both parties and he only cared about gp bc he didn't call ski patrol. She was rude and didn't ask if the guy was ok. Heck I was in a accident where I was hit and hit someone and in both times everyone asked each other if there okay. She cussed him out and left. She is tiny if he would have hit her she would have been injured badly so therefore I believe she hit him he was the injured person
If we had the same legal system in Switzerland, skiing would be impossible. By the way you have to only delete one word to make this a mildly interesting headline.
He's totally credible. Telling truth
This shouldn't even be in court. What a waste of time.
Just like in automobile accident, the one rear ended another drive is at fault! Down hill skier CANNOT see behind or sides of her. Uphill skier has all the opportunity to see what in front of him at all time. Terry Sanderson is absolutely opportunistic once he learns who he rear-ended with
This witness didn't observe anything. He is only reporting what GP told him. Testimony not relevant. Ramone actually saw the accident and has no reason to lie, unless they knew that GP was skiing and they were plotting against her to take her down and make some money. Completely unreasonable. Just pay Terry Sanderson his money and move on GP.
This guy's whole testimony is hearsay and should never have been allowed on the stand.
Ramon was the actual liar. He's in it for the money in some form, probably the one feeding the intial lies to the doc. Liars won't prevail and we will see them pay, I hope Ramon gets jail time for perjury. GP could have paid to avoid court and not have this dragged out but why pay someone for something you didn't do? GP is doing the right thing, it's about principle at this point.
He did see him up hill right before the accident and before that time as well going fast. So it is relevant!! Don’t ski with one eye I would say!! It’s his fault. This ski instructor was there the whole time even when ski patrol came. Everyone Skidaway down the hill, then he left last. That’s why she brought him to court!! She wouldn’t be here wasting her time with her busy lifestyle!! She would have settled out of court if it was her fault!!
@@Sw33tPiiiNk How in the world would they know from the moment it happened that there would be money in it. And oh, quick man with a concussion let's plot how to get money out of this. GP is off her gourd, looney bin kind off nut. Who knows she may have been on something going down that hill and has no idea what happened.
@@LilithGrey...FromHellhe also contradicted a lot of what Paltrow said, like claiming he helped her get up. Paltrow said nobody helped her up and she did it on her own.
This only shows questioning by the party whose interests the witness clearly lies with. He gets quite passive-aggressive when cross-examined.
I once came off a bit of a blind drop off at decent speed on a hill to find an entire group of ski patrol just standing right at the bottom. It caused me to intentionally crash in a very violent way to avoid hitting them. Regardless of fault, I laid there for 3 minutes gasping trying to catch my breath cause it turned out I broke 4 ribs. With 5-6 ski patrol standing less then 10-15ft away, not 1 came over to check on me and they all left while I was loudly gasping on my hands and knees. NEVER doubt the extreme incompetence of anyone.
Was it a green slope?
He worked for her on several occasions. Covering for her. He didn’t see it.
Does he come across as credible to you? Why does everyone assume that all people are willing to lie under oath for celebrities? None of Mr. Sanderson's testimony came off as believable whatsoever. Neither did his friend's.
Bull. He filed an accident report, which he's required to do as part of his job, immediately after. If he was going to lie why wouldn't he claim he saw the impact? And he had no idea this guy was going to sue years later. You ppl need to get a grip. I can't stand Gwyneth. She's obnoxious. Definitely not a fan of rich ppl either, but it's crystal clear the guy is lying. The jury will rule in her favor, I can guarantee that. Because it's obvious to anyone with common sense the guy is lying.
@@robinjustice4311 actually, he filed the accident report at end of day without knowing mr sandersons name. So… nice rant, but get your facts straight. This trial will decide who is lying and who is telling the truth. You are guilty of being a jerk. That takes very little common sense.
Do you ski?
@@Sheskis my whole life. Taught on the ice slopes of Vermont, now ski out west. So decades and decades of skiiing.
He was not there. How does he know?
He doesn't
He was there he just didn’t see the actual collision
So idk how much weight gwynwth paltrow’s ski instructor’s written report should hold bc directly under that text. He writes ‘I did not see the accident.’ Or something along those lines
Yes he did not see the exact moment it happened, and he was honest about it.. he was clear on the stand about it too.. what he testified to was the before and after the ski accident, which is very relevant too..
Oh, for Pete’s sake!
Seriously???
Did you listen? Clearly not. Listen to his testimony.
@@paindepices6793 lol, that is so silly!
"I did not see it but I heard her scream as she went down. I Skied to her and the male was behind her. Both were in discomfort. during lunch"
Paltrow’... guilty
This is a horrendous lawyer. Is this his first trial?
How is it that a skiing instructor is better spoken than a lawyer?
If Sanderson has TPI as claimed, he sure didn't show any signs while he testified earlier. He seemed sharp and atintafe while being asked questions!
Exactly, I have TBI and can't even get disability, I have to lie flat and have speech issues. There is a two year statute of limitations for medical lawsuits - why not the same for suing a random celebrity
Thanks Doc.
He meandered and kept answering a different point he wanted to make rather than the question asked. Somewhat consistent with the explanation of his symptoms. I think causation is the bigger issue here.
My brother has a really bad TBI as the result of crashing when he was a paratrooper. You'd never know just by talking to him but the signs are all there if you interact with him long-term, especially if you knew him before his TBI. In fact his own ex-wife didn't believe he really even had a TBI until he went to a specialized clinic and got a brain scan that showed a massive amount of damage.
Edit: To be clear, he does have a lot of issues, especially with numbers and memories from before the TBI as well as a huge change in personality. But, his ex refused to believe that they weren't just a part of his normal behavior (she didn't know him before) until there was irrefutable proof because he seems very together when you talk to him. He can hold a conversation just like he always could and he's still very intelligent.
there are varying levels of TBIs unless the TBI was severe ppl will be able to speak properly lol especially many years later and especially if your baseline cognitive skills were well above average to begin with. Sanderson very well had a mild TBI and has certainly experienced at least some loss which can be very frustrating (especially exacerbated if you have always been a type a high performer and have high expectations of yourself) etc
Not a lawyer but it seems to me that non of these lawyers have much experience in front of a jury.
This gentleman is the best witness! The other team knows that the gentleman lied and they are trying to cover him…🤔
I love it when the plaintiff lawyer called for hearsay and the witness made a "what do you mean look?!" then said "hearsay? this is exactly what I observed?" Man knew what he was talking about hahaha
08:43
This man said that he was watching gp but how was he doing that whenever he was teaching the kids
And the animation stunt was a joke! A good thing the jury won't see that again. Such a production set up.
@@benadams1661 He had no reason to think this liar was going to sue Gwyneth six years later. He immediately filed an accident report with the resort, which is his job. You ppl have zero critical thinking skills. I can't stand Gwyneth. She's obnoxious. But it's crystal clear that guy ran into her and not the other way around.
@@emilyheather328 That's not what he said at all. He said he didn't see the impact, only the immediate aftermath because he heard her scream so he looked.
She admitted to pay $8,000 to the ski instructors for one day. I've never heard of that price for skiing instructions.
You'd be surprised how much the rich and famous spend for 1 night out. Just cause you've never heard of it, doesn't mean it is outside the norm for the elite.
It's Gwyneth Paltrow, she steams her no-no square and blogs about it. It's completely believable that she would spend $8000 for ski lessons. Plus she had a "large" group with her it wasn't just her and 2 kids.
She actually didn’t. She paid $4,000. $8,000 is for brad’s and her children together. They weren’t married at the time.
That’s the rate at Deer Valley for 4 private instructors for an entire day. It’s $300/hr per instructor. It’s on their website. 🤷🏻♀️
It depends on the area, some places are so expensive only the rich can access
😂😂At 6:14 after he hears the objection, closes his eyes, and makes a wish 'dear God please let this end'.
😂😂😂
The ‘animation’ is just ‘an animation’ ; people are believing it’s what happened with no proof ; bizarre
I can't believe how bad her lawyer is. I can't stand him. This case should be so easy and he sucks.
he cant remember how they skied down after the incident but clearly remembers that sanderson was the down hill skier and is as fault. RED FLAG. Another red flag ? Hes a ski instructor in his 60s and above.
He said he saw that Sanderson was the UPHILL skier, was skinny very fast, was approaching Paltrows position from behind, did not see the actual collision but looked back a few seconds after the Collison and saw Paltrow positioned downhill and Sanderson STILL uphill.
@@juliehill3479 He didn't see the collision.
YOU SHOULD APPLY FOR JURY DUTY WHEN A COP IS ON THE STAND
This law suit should have never made it to court
He said he didnt see the collision...who landed on who? A collision people need medical checks...were these done?
Not necessarily. People fall all the time while skying. If the parties say they are fine, no one forces them to seek medical attention if they seem fine. Sanderson didn’t feel he needed attention at the time.
"during lunch" she complained of soreness!
That means he wrote report after he went to lunch!! Not after accident
This guy is lying when he claims he can't recall if she yelled at Sanderson and then he pretends he didn't either hes covering their bad behavior
Maybe he honestly doesn't recall. Why lie. She's admitted she did that. So a lie would make no sense.
@@cradames yeah it’s been years honestly I’m sure he doesn’t remember if she yelled
Listening to his testimony, I got "Why is the carpet so dirty?" vibes from Sanderson, like if he overexplained, he would seem more credible. The man had catteracts and blindness in one eye and was getting too old to do one of the things he loved most. Lots of older people rail angrily against getting their drivers license taken away too. I think he is at fault and his pride just can't accept it.
You NAILED it!
CORRECT!!!
On top of it Sanderson was an optometrist, by his profession he should have known clearly that he had a sight problem, that puts everyone in danger. Anyone who did ski would know, sometimes the light condition on the snow makes hard to see depth, contrast and distance even for someone with a perfect vision.
@@swisspuppy yeah, that's all true and that, BUT", - after reading the first line of your comment, I was a little surprised that you then, after stating he was an optician, you then go on to describe the light ambiance and snow depth etc, ..... When I would have thought that ( after stating that he's a optician).... That " it makes the blood run cold ", that someone, of this " appalling " character would be working on people's eyes, of all things, a body part so intimate, and this man, arguably a narcissist, and of extremely dubious character ( and quite possibly mentally unstable) WORKING ON PEOPLE'S EYES, for gods sake, like I say - IT MAKES THE BLOOD RUN COLD.
What does “Why is the carpet so dirty” mean?
How can anyone believe Terry , he testified today he has multiple personalities. He is a fruit cake .
Wright. Sanderson is at fault!! The ski instructor stated he saw Sanderson up hill right before the crash!! He asked if they were okay. They all said they were OK but sore. Then he saw them all ski down the hill. He was the last one to leave the scene. This is the best testimony along with Gwyneth Paltrow’s!! They are the most accurate and trust worthy!! Mr Sanderson should not be on the slopes with being blind in one eye. And going blind in the other!!
GP testimony is beyond legit!
Eric contradicted most of it. He said he helped GP get up and take her skies off after hearing her scream. GP denies all that, she said she got herself up and did not take her skies off or scream.
@@canadianbeef1958 she said on the stand she was screaming at him though ?
@@canadianbeef1958 in my opinion, these are small excusable memory differences that are excusable and doesn’t affect the case that much because it’s what happened after the collision, not during the collision.. after so long, especially when their deposition was taken 3 yrs after the accident happened, and especially if the ski instructor did not expect anyone to sue him or GP..
@@MellowWell0w isn't that also true for Terrys witnesses?
@@canadianbeef1958 not really.. because he contradicted his own testimony.. what I was trying to say is different people would remember different accounts of an event, sometimes you’d forget some of that, but not too much and not too major.. but with Mr Ramon, he contradicted his own testimonies multiple times, the amount of time keeps changing, stories keep changing between before his deposition, his deposition, even on the stand he contradicted himself.. my previous reply was based on your reply that some of Eric’s account contradicts GP’s.. so 2 different people contradicting one another, not that they contradict themselves
He works for the resort and the elite what else can he say he also left him laying there injured.
No, the ski instructor said he was the LAST to put on his skis and leave. Mr Sanderson and his friend preceded him down the slope.
Sanderson stood up, talked, aplogized. There were no visible signs he had suffered severe issues
So you say 😂
A high paid private instructor isn’t going to tarnish his rep and his cash cow by saying his client was at fault. That greatly damages his reputation. Just saying, food for thought. He admits to not seeing the collision but has no problem saying who was uphill and who was downhill. So essentially he observed nothing that states either party was at fault but he speculated to who was at fault since he did not see the collision itself
This ski instructor is going to be in the celebrity’s camp no matter what.
what are you talking about? camp.... it is very likely his report was accurate.
That’s ridiculous. Dude had a credible story and no indications of lying.
Gwynth is guilty
Well, people go where the $ is…. 😅
You have obviously never been skiing at a top ski resort. There are many extremely wealthy people there from all over the world.
These "lawyers" are a clown show. I've never seen the term professional applied so loosely as it is now and that applies to ALL fields from medical and technical to this laugh fest.
Clown 🤡 s
They need Jack McCoy.
Both these attorneys are so lame! Depp's attorney could have wrapped this up in half a day!!
Just shut up fan boy
Am thinking the same! 🐑🐑🇳🇿🇳🇿NZ
I cannot watch this trial. It makes me very agitated 😵💫🥴😵💫🥴
Chief complaint doesn't add up with report for accident, the fact that she left without being there to sign report is very suspicious
She wanted to get to her children asap, and let her handlers handle things, as is usual for people in her position
The report didn't happen until after she left. After discovering who he hit, he suddenly decided he was injured. She was not required to sign anything.
@@VioletJoy right and in the report it says the instructor did Not see what happened
And she didn't explain exactly what happened
Either way it seems like GP and instructor on same page and that's to disregard any human life that crises their path my opinion
@@VioletJoy on another note can you imagine this elderly man risking having Ramon break his ribs in order to have GP pay...even being military don't mean alot I just won a trial de Novo against a 74year old military vet who served 35years the biggest liar I've ever met the judge was able to see that
@@VioletJoy also on report he's reporting what she said during lunch they weren't having lunch during accident
He wrote report to protect her after lunch he wasn't even going to write a report, he f up
I’ve skied these past 60 years. Have seen lots of unintentional mishaps. Only in USA is it possible to turn a minor incident into an embarrassing and laughable clown show , bolstered by the media and spinning a nothing burger into a massive waste of time
If he was a good lawyer he simply would have asked did she tip you for your service?
Yeap I’m surprised the plaintiff’s attorney didn’t ask Mr Ramon about the tips he received.. but the plaintiff’s attorney did comment about tipping when she questioned GP when on stand..
None of his statement now matches his own text messages to the friend of the guy who was hit where he said in text messages that Gwen have plowed into him They're trying to play fast and lose with the facts Because his statement now under oath doesn't reflect his text messages
I think you’re conflating his messages with Colonel Sanders’
Is her lawyer on sedatives....?
That animation really made a big difference in showing who were at fault for causing the collision in this initially confusing and conflicting case! Bloke is at fault not her. Equivalent to diving in front of an incoming train! Case closed!
She's guilty. Pay up!
He needs a witness. I honestly don't believe him. Everything is too fishy
typically in America they sue each other for everything
Terry Sanderson is dreaming. He admits to mis speaking alot (his words) he talks about the personality inside of him?????? Wtf is that about. He can't take criticism. And is obviously never in the wrong in his eyes. And he's obviously excited about being famous. Well your famous now Mr.
At what cost? The cost is anxiety, brain injury etc. Not fun. They can't undo the ribs, and trauma with words or even money. So he will have to accept the money. But can't take things is often a result of brain traumas. Even see some NFL players off them self in front of their coach? Not fun for them and most people don't understand and never will.
YOu have no clue so you ramble on with total lack of empathy or understanding. Nice job!
He’s covering. ‘Scream’… she denied this. And he bumped into her yet didn’t see this. But led with it. A skier can quickly overtake / esp if out of control.
Last week when I understood the ski instructor, (Deer Valley), would be testifying, right then I knew the case would hinge on his testimony, he was one of the most credible witnesses, (demonstrating, integrity and good character), and HE was there!
What do you think the ski instructor's gonna say we'll say anything to save his job
Do you think retirement age men are ski instructors for money? It’s a minimum wage job. They do it for the joy of skiing. Hence why almost all ski instructors are college kids and retired people.
If he was trying to “save his job,” why wasn’t he fired the day of the incident?
@@khure711 The experienced ones are paid quite well
He clearly saw asked if they were all okay and they said yes!!
@@B-ch6uk no they’re not lol, it a minimum wage job, the incentive is a free skiing and first tracks. They don’t make great money from teaching people to ski. How do I know this? 30 years of skiing on 3 different continents. And i worked as a lift operator and ski instructor while in high school and college.
Ski instructor did not see the incident. Therefore he is not a witness to actual impact. His loyalty is to Paltrow because she is his payday. She didn’t have injuries only thing on her mind afterwards was scheduling a massage. As strange as Sanderson is he was only one who had actual injuries which medical expert had said could have only happened if he was the one hit. So her kids and husband are going to testify. Hmm wonder how they will lean? Not much stock in their testimony. Two oddballs involved in a ski accident. I’m leaning towards Sanderson based on medical experts testimony. Also her scream was most likely when she realized she was about to hit him. Her attention was most likely on the kids and not paying attention herself. Christiansen is an expert instructor covering for his client. Bottom line he did not see what happened, period.
Nope not so, remember he went into her path and thus caused that collision! Any injuries sustained were the consequence of his own stupidity! GP is not at fault so it's case closed!
@@jettser17UK She hit him. Case closed. Both weirdos, but she hit him. So Christiansen is not being truthful saying he hit her??? He doesn’t know he didn’t see it.
@@mh.1568 Pfff what utter nonsense cos that daft and supposedly "experienced by 37 years" bloke cut into her path from a distance, regardless if she hit him or whether he hit her sideways. Check that animation rendition which states the obvious! Bloke is at fault not her. Equivalent to diving in front of an incoming train! So it's case closed!
@@mh.1568 You for sure lack common sense never mind! Hopefully that American judge won't make that same error!
@@jettser17UK Common sense has nothing to do with the laws. That’s the problem. Stick to the facts.
If it is true what this man, the ski instructor did at the crash scene, yelling at Sanderson without fully knowing the facts, which he just admitted to, then I feel he acted very unprofessionally and obviously had bias towards his paying client .
He knows that Sanderson was uphill coming down towards GP. So he knows that Sanderson caused the accident. Listen to Sanderson, he has no clue what really happened.
@@gutenbird I didn't state who is in the right and who is in the wrong. Only that Christensen didn't see the impact and to yell at someone who has just been involved in an accident is very unprofessional. Doing so makes me suspicious that he only had his clients interest at heart. I still haven't decided who is right or wrong, I am waiting to the end for that.
@@61sunset Sanderson is 100 percent at fault in this case. Jerk runs over someone and gets starstruck. And that's from his own conversations after the accident. Then decides he wants his moment of fame.
If and only if it is true
Wrong the person who scream first and blame the other not necessarily is telling the truth. A lady run the red light on a busy intersection destroy the side of my car, nothing happened to her car. The Insurance Company was putting Blame on Me When It Clearly was the Fault of Their Client. I won the case, a young lady saw the accident and became my witness and we got a video recording from the intersection camera. I won the case. This witness is wrong.
COMMON SENSE!!!! she fell into him with great force to have him face down on the snow with a concussion and few cracked ribs...... she slipped off his body where she eventually got up and left the scene while someone was clearly injured!!!.... If he was the person who ran into her back then she would be face down on the ground with cracked ribs unable to quickly recover
Yeah I also wonder why she didn’t get bruises or any other injuries
Exactly! It's so obvious.
She landed on him when he hit her from behind. No proof of concussion. COMMON SENSE!!!!!!!
This is not how skiing works. If you’re struck at your feet from behind, you fall backwards. His knee or something in his legs would have serious injury if he fell forward, since his skis were still on
Tell me you don’t ski without telling me you don’t ski
Why is this suit even being televised? Who is to gain the most from allowing it? Not sure who is responsible, but there is one person to benefit despite the outcome
If GP was hit from behind by a downhill skier, the speed at which she was hit combined with the height and weight differentials, would have resulted in significant injury.
Sanderson is at fault!! The ski instructor stated he saw Sanderson up hill right before the crash!! He asked if they were okay. They all said they were OK but sore. Then he saw them all ski down the hill. He was the last one to leave the scene. This is the best testimony along with Gwyneth Paltrow’s!! They are the most accurate and trust worthy!! Mr Sanderson should not be on the slopes with being blind in one eye. And going blind in the other!!
@@stephmartin1148 *uphill *trustworthy
And you would NEVER lie for her because she is a celeb...Right??
They had lunch and then after 3 hrs he wrote his "report "... hmm
No I meant the Judges voice is the best actually.
So when you ski you assume risk, especially on a beginner hill, people ski out of control and crash all the time…it’s sad he was hurt but no one should be at fault
“That is ridiculous “ as he swirls around in his swivel chair like a lying schoolgirl…
He shoulda "PUT IT IN REVERSE TERRY!"
Funny how I went sking and a man slipped and hit me and I hit someone in front and landed between his legs we all fell..I got hurt with cuts on my arms but managed to get up and the guy got up as well we just checked if we all were ok and left. Oh wait maybe because I have no money or not an actress that's why I didn't get sued!😅 what a freaking waste of tax payers time!!
Great witness. Sorry Mr Sanderson was so badly hurt, but he was clearly at fault.
Did she really NEED to sue over this?
She didn't sue - HE did. He had dollar signs in his eyes after he realized with whom he caused an accident.
It's interesting that his testimony is completely contrary to Ramon's.
He also contradicted her testimony in some places.
@CMLAFLAMME Apparently only 1 person saw the crash. Ramon. Neither of the two parties involved actually saw what happened. My comment was more directed at the aftermath. Was Ramon there or not, was Christiansen there right away, were they on top of each other or not, was he unconscious or not, did Christiansen take their skis off or not, were they facing up hill or not, etc etc.
To be perfectly honest though, it seems like it was just an accident, and you know what they say. Accidents happen. It doesn't seem like anybody was acting recklessly. Yeah, he was injured and she's a callous b@#$ but that doesn't mean it should be in court.
This Sanderson accuser is so lying. If he had four broken ribs, there is no way an ambulance would not have been called. I broke my ankle and I was writhing in pain, and an ambulance had to be called. And, that was just one bone. An athlete sometimes has to be carried off the court if they severely sprain their ankle. This man alleges he broke four ribs. If he suffered such a bad injury that he was knocked unconscious, and suffered four broken ribs, an ambulance would have had to be called. You don't just walk away or ski away from four broken bones. If the impact was so severe to suffer four broken ribs, he would have been out for more than a few seconds. And if he was unconscious for ten minutes, his friend would have called an ambulance. Someone would have called an ambulance. Sanderson is so lying.
You are making stuff up using fuzzy logic. I've had a buddy that fell and did crack 3 ribs and he was hurting but did not have an ambulance. We later drove him to the hospital, no one at the resort did anything. See I've seen it for real while you must live in fantasy land with those assumptions. Assumption is the mother of all screw ups. Remember that.
What's the weird thing she does with her lips? She looks Goofy.!!
Dude everyone nitpicking GP is hilarious. Ive never seen so many envy one person. She is beautiful 🤷♀️
She looks so over-botoxed.
@@anonymoususer4866 Envy??? HAHAHAHAHA.
@@anonymoususer4866
I agree!!!
@@anonymoususer4866 You sound like a fan. Thin lips a sour puss is what people are seeing even Depp commented on it.
This courtcase is such a waste of money and time. It is clear that the person just wants to try to get money from a famous person.
He admits he didn’t see it. He made assumptions about her scream- because he said ‘ she wouldn’t do that’ This is all a giant guess that smacks of CYA. That video was NOT a re-enactment. It was an admitted by witness, inaccurate representation of the memory seared in his brain- while can’t recall specific statements to victim/friend
His buddy didn't see either, the medics coming to help is not helping Sanderson case.
He needed lens, he didn't have any brain damages.
And he didn't know at all what happened.
Only his friends was telling that he was hit by GP.
So Sanderson probably think that way due to his Friend
Moreover, the fact that the medics tells that Sanderson didn't recall what happened, kill his case as he was explaining clearly with very detail what happened before which is highly suspicious.
Yeah the video is pure nonsense.
Lies on top of lies fr 🤮$$$$!!!
@@buelahland Another intellectual reply to my posts-
He admits he didn't see the incident directly. Similarly, no one saw Amanda Knox kill Meredith Kercher but she was convicted of the crime, anyway. The evidence against Amanda was pretty sketchy. The ski instructor wrote up a report immediately after the incident. In the report he said he saw Sanderson uphill from Paltrow. That's not memory blurred by the passage of time.
Clearly and sadly none of these lawyers are skiers.
Describe resort wouldn't dare say its a celebrity's fault it would give them a bad name. This man didn't even see it and he's making an assumption based on what she said and not the other man. Wouldn't you need to know both stories.
The ski instructor saw Sanderson uphill right before it happened, and he was also right there after it happened. He asked if they were okay. They all said yes we are okay but sore. Then they all skied a way down the hill. The ski instructor was the last one to leave.
Well, he admitted he didn't know how to ski, so you're more than likely to get into an accident. Even when you do know how to ski. I don't really get this case. I think this guy is suing her because it's her. People have accidents all the time and skiing is so dangerous. Maybe he should just stay off the slopes
Absolutely.....he violated health & safety to begin with...
Skier Responsibility Code!!!
The lawyers hair looks funny😂
I was a ski instructor in Mammoth, Lakes, California, and a ski school supervisor at Mount Rose overlooking Reno Nevada. I can’t believe that the instructors and the patrolman left the scene without making sure everybody was actually OK even though they said they were. The plaintive had broken bones. Why would he be allowed to ski down on his own With broken bones? I believe the instructors miss led the patrolmen, and I also believe the instructors really did not do a good job of noting the details of a pretty severe impact. The fact that no one actually saw who was the skier above leads me to believe that no one actually knows.
I fell while bicycling and broke ribs. Nothing to do about it and was miles from home so I rode home. If everyone says they are okay and get back in their skis I would suppose the ski patrol would move on. People fall down. This incident just got out of control and never should have gone to court. I feel bad for the plaintiff but he seems to not remember things correctly and didn’t get good advise on what to do legally.
Sanderson looked at this as a no lose situation. Either he gets paid (settlement) OR he gets his 15 mins of fame. Trust me he loves that the defendant is GP. He isn’t gonna be awarded $$$ from the jury but he will still feel he won.
If she was looking across the slope at her child, she would have seen the guy coming at her…
This lawyer like what?
Seriously, ya got hurt on a ski hill , suck it up , the hills here make you sign a waver , this whole thing is ridiculous
These attorneys and the various Specialist are horrible the Jury should reject this trial know and go home . Pathetic G.P. Brought this nonsense to trial. Why? Ego?
I would have hired Mrs Vasquez 🏆
THAT would be entertaining!
She would’ve finished this long time ago
Get in line…
She wouldn't take this case, GP is guilty
Good point.
If you are hit in the upper back by someone traveling faster, you will both fall forward. And the person hit will suffer the most. One side or the other is telling a big fib, I am not sure who. But I am suspicious of how much this guy was paid to baby sit one kid seems way beyond norms, even for the wealthy. If he is making that kind of money, he should be retired already.
His age could not have helped. He may have suffered more because his body is more brittle.
Think you would find that the Ski School would get a decent chunk of the hourly rate
She is worth $200 million why put this man thru such torture
Unbelievable. Do not like her anymore 😢
I never did, she is a turdling. I put her and Alec Baldwin in the same boat.
Comes across as kind of unlikeable
Would love to know GP's skiing ability. This guy just said she was making turns. How does a skier of 37 years (doctor) ski between a skier's skis who is "skiing" which is basically back and forth, or like the man said,... making turns? GP said she looked down and saw two skiis between hers? While she was turning or skiing back and forth? How is that possible? It makes more sense that one of these folks clipped the other while both were in motion. Usually happens to when one is skiing faster than the other, from an angle, because at least one of the two is not paying attention.
See you later speculator...
He didn't say that. He said he'd seen her ski proficiently earlier. He admitted he wasn't looking at the time of the collision.
Credible, impartial witness. Should be devestating to Terry Sanderson's case.
They ran into each other, one is no more guilty than the other. Skiing is fun, but all of us know that you are taking a risk of getting hurt. I have had a couple of collisions, where I can honestly say that I and the other person accidentally ran into one another. No one was at fault! We were freaking skiing!! It happens!! Just because GP didn't say anything to the man does not make it illegal. This case should have been dismissed from the start.
If you've had a couple of collisions where "no one was at fault" it means that you're either not in control or not aware of your surroundings. Which one is it?
I've had 2 in the last 25 years 1 was my fault the other was not, it's hard to apportion blame in the 18 years before that, can you blame a snow-fence for your own hubris?
@@Incendri it means we ran into each other, because we were skiing. Things happen.
@@paulagriffin338 They do, but that doesn't change that people are responsible for these things happening.
@@Incendri Of course, but when we are taking risks like skiing, skating etc., We are all responsible in knowing that it's highly possible to get injured. I most certainly would have rendered aid if I was GP, that's what good people do. GP most certainly showed her true colors for her lack of common kindness and caring for someone's well being.
This is one of the most riduculous things I´ve seen for a long time. Only in America. Oh my God.
Ol Terry tryin to get a pay day ....
When hes delusional and at fault for hurting himself. After he recklessly slammed into ger They fell over and he got hurt ...