Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
FRSKY X20 PRO | SHOULD I BUY IT?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 сер 2024
- So frsky have released a 'pro' version of the x20.
What exactly do you get for your money? Should you buy it?
-----
Hey guys.. generating videos takes allot of time and effort.
If you like the channel; please click like on the video; subscribe and tell your friends about it.
Happy flying...
-----
LIKE THESE VIDEOS? Consider leaving a tip...
www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...
SHOP ONLINE AT RT-RC.com
bit.ly/2XeR4Ld
SUPPORT ME ON PATREON at:
bit.ly/2L5gtoc
VISIT MY BLOG at:
bit.ly/2RHdGEO
FIND US ON FACEBOOK
bit.ly/3y6HL1k
ALL MY 3D DESIGNS ARE ON THINGIVERSE at:
bit.ly/2XsmI8l
------
Getting into RC & DRONES?
CHECK HOBBYKING OUT FOR CHEAP RC GEAR at:
bit.ly/2L3X0nK
LOADS OF FPV GEAR ON BANG GOOD at:
bit.ly/3pLRk0y
AMAZON SELLS STUFF TO at:
amzn.to/39l1gaT
----
Looking to improve your youtube channel performance?
www.tubebuddy.com/rtrc
----
Check out my buddies channels.. these guys feature often in my videos and help to make great content.
RNelson
/ @rnelsonfpv
SkyrisUK
/ @skyrisuk
GosHawk FPV
/ @goshawkfpv
ByronP
/ @byronp2573
I have one of the first ones, it's the best feeling radio I have ever owned.
Hello, you forgot one important improvement and that is internal 8GB memory, so no need for Sd card anymore,
if U dont want it for backup / logging etc.
Great video…. The X20 Pro has me giving Frsky hard look. Long time JR and Spektrum guy here but a the functionality of the Pro seems to match up and/or exceed that of my trusted DX18. Before making the leap to the NX20 I want to give the X20 Pro a serious look.
Would be fair to say it exceeds the spektrum stuff in pretty much every way
Hi Rob, I have the X20S and simply filled the module-bay side ridges down so a Crossfire Nano would fit. Can you please tell me if the X20-Pro module bay side ridges are identical to the X20S ?
Hey.. Identical. This bit is also in plastic so could be filed down.
Yes buy one its fantastic. I bought 2.
Does it include the S20 HD video receiver (receiving HD video on the screen)?
Nope
question i have is both external antennas appear to be 2.4 surly when using 868mhz this would be risking damage to the radio due to reflected power? Would the r9 standard antenna not be better?
The 900 on the pro is internal antenna only.
By design.
Nothing to worry about
Why is there a port for 868 external antenna then? It should have the correct length antenna for the port
@@mickbroad9973 the port on on the x20 pro is two 2.4g ports for the twin protocol.
In the x20 (plastic case) yiu have a 2.4 external and 900 external.
In the pro you have a 900 built into the handle.
If you refer to the u.fl on the internal module that is not connected to anything - it's not used. The physical use of it is disabled in software, so no antenna needed on it.
Sorry to jump in here with a stupid Q but does it work with Spektrum receivers?
If you use an external multi protocol module, then it can work with spektrum rx no issue
are you able to rotate the sticks to an angle like the x20s
Not tried myself but it has same gimbals as x20 so likely yes.
Yes
What is range ?
Which one is best
Skyroid m12l vs frsky tandem x20 pro 😢😢😢😢
Never used a skyroid so complete unknown.
Personally looking at it the skyroid is designed for a single job. Uav commercial operations.
I am sure it's great. But prob a bit limited in it's offering.
@@RTRCTV sir what is controll range of x20 pro ?
Can we look live fpv camera in screen?
@@Thomas--Jaleby The pro does not have fpv built into the display.
Range wise.. Technically with the twin lora system or tandem rx you can go 30+ km. Or plug a module in and you could go further.
@@RTRCTV thanks ❤️
Years ago I bought a Frysky Horus after having good experiences with Taranis. But in the end it cost me 3 planes due to the poor quality and the danger of parts flying around out of control.😅
I owned a horus for years.. Never once had am issue.
Since you have so many different systems, each one is not in use for long. In my case the cables to the field sensors on both sides of the control sticks are broken. They were cheap plastic insulation cables that were installed too short.
@RTRCTV my friends fly these radios in jets with zero issues. Great radio's
@@oliundtrude5318 maybe it's not a question of how long you own them.. but how much air time? I certainly get allot of airtime. Way more than the average flyer.
Has there been a lua for this which allows ExpressLRS? I am highly inttterested in this transmitter
Yes. For ages. Works well.
New 1.5.1 ethos will support elrs at 911k and possibly higher if your module supports it.
@RTRCTV but the pro does not have a module. It's internal so that's what I meant.
@@bigeclipse718 you would have to use an external elrs module.
@@RTRCTV ah that stinks. I was hoping that maybe they created a Lua script for the pro version to work with the internal module.
@@bigeclipse718 the internal module is a totally different hardware base to what elrs uses. Not possible to do that
aluminium casing ? no winter flying,
any way looking good
Doubt will be an issue. Certainly never had a problem with the aluminium case on the jeti radios.
@@RTRCTVThe radio will be fine😄, just the hands are freezing🥶
@@RTRCTV As much as it costs, it should include heated hand grips.
@@CertsUAsPilot Well that would drop your battery power 🙂 But seriously.. thats not fair. The radio is more capable and as well built as many radios that command an even higher price tag.
@@RTRCTV I was just kidding. I had Futaba and JR radios for years, cost from $480 - $800. I decided to give FrSky a try and bought the X20S last year. FrSky X20S gives the best bang for your bucks. I'm glad I switched and not going back to Futaba.
I honestly don't see the point of this. What does it have on the S? A few momentary switches and 2 extra trims. And inbuilt TWIN. Text to speech is definitley not there yet and more of a gimmick than anything when you have a touchscreen. I can throw a TWIN module on the X18 or X20. Or ELRS. Aluminum case is a con to some ppl especially in cold weather. I can and have installed a locking switch on my S for esc/ignition. The X18 has two extra trims and I honestly feel for those who are thumbers or not using a tray the X18 is probably the better radio. And its $275... I know I know, if I don't like it I shouldn't buy it. Fair. I just feel like this thing is a status symbol for 50% more money than the X20S and barely any more capabilities. Now if the X24 comes out with built in wifi and will update over the air and a whole bunch of other stuff... yeah. I think I'll wait for that. You definitely break it down well at the end tho. Its a want not a need. We only go around once and he who has the most stuff at the end wins right?
It's not two extra momentary switches. It has two extra push button 2 position switches, adjustable sliders, extra trims and comes with a hardcase and receiver. If you subtract 175$ for the receiver and the case then it brings x20pro in a more desirable range.
Yep Text to speech sucks. Audio sucks too. I like the X20s red better. I have both and like the red. Now if they used the the internal memory like the X18 it would be better.
@short5stick the audio on mine is actually better. All the switches and even the gimbals are proprietary to the Pro model. They are of a higher quality and are actually different parts compared to the other models. Again, the other models are great but that's what you are paying for. The built in TWIN will be a game changer as they start pushing that more than tandem to compete with ELRS
Do you need any of your transmitters?
no. Get the red X20s . Audio is better
I feel the X20 pro is a slap in the face of the long term Frsky users.
You're paying a big premium for just a aluminum shell and some bragging rights.
I see people buying this transmitter that never would have given Frsky a fair shot because of the lower prices but now it gets them some sort of status they are suddenly interested in Frsky.
What annoys me the most is that those people get a numbered plaque and a so called limited edititon transmitter.
As if they are anymore special then the people that bought the X20 an the X18 and made it popular in the first place.
The whole ELRS fork saga in the Twin module is a whole different issue and such a typical Frsky thing to do.
Frsky makes a nice radio but they don't seem to learn from the mistakes they made in the past.
Not really sure I agree with your views.. But hey.. Each to their own.
It's other little thing as well. I bought a 130 dollar tray for my X20s that can't be used with the X20 pro because they decided to change the profile of the transmitter just a little.
And don't get me started on the loop for the neckstrap on the twin x lite (and the X12) or the X20 not being compatible with 3d party modules, what were they smoking to come up with that.
They make fantastic radio's and I love Ethos as an operating system but they keep fucking up when it comes to small details like that. @@RTRCTV
While I do agree with much of the "Puts the 'F' in Frsky" sentiment, I'll kindly ask anyone who does not own a Taranis X9D manufactured in 2013 to sit down.
If this radio were running open/edgeTX with 2.4&900 elrs, many of us would turn our heads again. None of us are interested in your "FRSKY" software.
@@dr0n3droid a broad statement.
Possibly within your peer group this is the case. But for many people and likely a higher number they found opentx / edge tx too complex to use.
The x20 is one of frsky best selling radios. Commercials clearly tell a different story?
I don't need 20 channels. Do you know if there is a smaller? And what is the software?
My answer: No.
At least give a decent answer with reasons?