He Couldn’t Walk See or Work-Still Drowning in Child Support! What the Judge Did Next Will Shock You
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 лют 2025
- Keywords:
video response, female dating reaction, female reaction, reaction video, how to date women, men, reaction video, feminism, Child Custody, Family Law, Legal, Texas Law, Court, Parenting, Visitation, Child Support, Zoom Court, Lawyer, Attorney, Judge, Paternity, Lawsuit, Legal Justice, Contempt, Grandparents' Rights, Virtual Court, Evidentiary Hearing, Motion, Objection, Referee Recommendation, Default, Parenting Time, Legal Advice, Legal Representation, Family Court, Family Matters, Case, Legal Proceedings, Law and Order. Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW),
NOTE-
The copyright to this post doesn’t belong to us, it is edited and shared only for the purpose of awareness, if the content OWNER (visual/audio) of this video has any issue, we request you to directly message to the email in the about page, thus we sort out the outcome.
Does anyone know if the husband ended up being the father on the second case?
He is the father. But she didn’t want him to be. Took him coming back to court to get the test done.
These rule suck for dads all they want to do is harass and I am a mom but I can’t work
It’s not harassing when you’re not paying support. Kids are very expensive. He is half responsible and what some of these fathers pay is peanuts. It goes the same if it’s reversed. Someone needs to think of the kids. If they pay their support the kids can do more things, be in activities. Both parents are responsible and both parents should have equal time unless there are other circumstances.
@ your wrong and you know it greedy that’s what these women r and we r going to agree to disagree
Do you even realize that most of these cases are taken to court by the state? It’s not the mothers looking for the support. If any of the kids are on state assistance, the state will take them to court. The child support is determined by the income of both parents. You always complain because the mother is not working. If the mother has a small child, she should be home with that child and not working. And what’s wrong with the father paying support for their kids? Are you against fathers supporting their kids? What I will agree with you is there are a few lazy mothers when their kids are older that still don’t wanna work and those are the ones that are looking for more money. The last case that was just on there where the father said he can’t stand for a long time and he’s eyesight is bad, don’t you think he can work? If he was so disabled he would be on Social Security disability. So he should be out working and making money for his kids. The only time I feel bad for the fathers is when they don’t get the parenting time that they deserve. I do believe it should be 50-50 in most of the cases. And what about these fathers that come back and they don’t want to pay as much money as they’re paying because they have another family. They have a wife and they have other kids now. Your first children should be your priority. If you can’t pay for them, you shouldn’t be having more kids. So no, you pay for your first kid and then worry about the other one second. If these mothers and fathers can’t work together to pay for their kids and help their kids, then they shouldn’t be having them. And that goes for the mother and the father, the father is just as responsible. They knew what they were getting into. And you always pick and choose the court cases that go against the mother why don’t you show court cases on both sides? Cause both sides are right and both sides are wrong. There’s a lot of scumbag dads that come on there that don’t want to pay for their kids. They don’t even see their kids. They’re out of their lives for years and then come back and want custody. Show those cases too. I’m guessing you got screw by a “baby mama”