Its way off from being perfect , thats for sure. I've selected subjects, then the inverse to change the background and after a new background generates, I can clearly see the edges , ears etc have been pulled into the background, now wearing spock ears etc and other weird phenomonen, so the select subject doesn't properly work, so that needs to be fixed.
I don't even know what to think about all of this to be honest! It's truly mind blowing and no doubt the biggest change to our industry since the switch to digital from film. It has huge potential for all creatives and certainly changes the game!
Flashback to a wedding in 2021 when I had to remove the two videographers from in between the B&G in most of the ceremony photos because they would not move…. This tool could’ve saved me HOURS!!! I might have to go back to those images just to try this tool and see how well it does compared to my painstakingly long photoshop work! Thanks sharing, Neil!
I have been using it to repair old ripped photos. I took a photo that I had tried to fix last year and spent four hours on reconstructing part of a face. The generative ai did it with one pass. I just used the lasso tool and selected the ripped area and done. I simple couldn't believe it.
I just tried this myself and I am amazed as well. I don't know what the future will be for photography because if you look at a photo, you will then ask yourself, is it a real photo or is it an AI generated one? That is the part I don't like.
I shouldn't comment as I watch as im just more stunned each time Neil haha. Removing that woman from the hug photo and then creating half a registrar from nothing. how on earth is this possible haha I need a lie down.
😂😂😂 don't worry mate, I am like you, just completely mind blown by it all. People would spend years learning Photoshop to try and do that, now we can do it in seconds 😱
@@NeilRedfern its the whole generating things without any reference as to what should be there like the registrar or the woman in the hug shot, creating flowers and railings. Jesus Christ
the beach scene problem was, you need to seperate them from the background first. like you would with the old way of filling the background. :) (perhaps keep feet if u want them blended)
I first dove into photography back in 1974 when I was 12 years old. My first camera was my father's Agfa rangefinder camera. I then graduated big-time when my father graciously bought me a brand new Nikon F2A in 1978. Everything about those film cameras was manual, including the exposure and the focus. I considered myself a "photographer" or "picture taker" back then. I then got into doing b/w darkroom work, which made me question whether I was still a "picture taker" or a "picture maker". But...Ansel Adams' photos incorporated a lot of darkroom work, so I didn't feel so bad when I thought that way. I then went digital and started using Photoshop in the '90s. Today, I'm doing even more amazing things with Photoshop and have considered myself a "picture maker" since I became fairly good at using Photoshop. But this Generative Fill just takes photography to a level beyond our wildest imaginations, as you so rightly pointed-out. And you're also right by saying we can never trust another picture we see from this point forward! I shudder to think about photos that will start cropping-up in the already heated political arena! Thanks for creating this video. It was quite eye-opening to say the least!
you see me speechles, fascinated and... just speechless! First question which come sinto my mind: How will the competitions be able to control, which photo was heavily manipulated and which not? this is so crazy
Mind blown... it's a game changer for all creative industries and much bigger for photographers than the move from analogue to digital. People will still want authentic, real moments BUT the hero shots, the OCF portraits etc... you can create most on PS after the wedding has finished. Great video - thanks.
Thank you, I will do :) I wouldn't say excitement, more astonishment! I don't know how I feel about it overall, there are very useful aspects to it, but there are also lots of negatives that come with it too. I will definitely be making more videos on this though as it is going to change the industry, I have no doubts about that
It could affect people in commercial photography, but it will never replace the real photography, for example; wedding shoots, pet photography or anything of that nature. The reason being is because the biggest part of photography people are forgetting is to do with painting the character by capturing actual real moments. Sure, you could tell this technology to take the dog and give it this specific characteristic, but it's still fake. A real photograph is capturing something genuine, an actual moment that people can look back on and that cannot be replicated by A.I.
I would certainly use this to make adjustments to "problem areas" in a photo that I want to fix. How is that any different than us going in with our clone stamp tools, healing brushes, etc? I would never use it to completely artificially make an image or have the faked item be used as the centerpiece of the image. I also would never use it for putting people in areas where they really weren't. For example, I wouldn't take a photo of someone near a waterfall and then use it to create a completely faked environment to make the image bigger. It's something I would merely use as a "touch up" tool on my photos.
@@mpetrie, yes, as someone who is a pet photographer, to me this is ideal for certain things like removing objects, it's more powerful. I think problem areas like you've mentioned would be interesting to see the results of for what it will achieve. I tested it yesterday, it seems it is still a bit buggy where you can see the seems from where it's added on, but it's early days and given the fact it's able to generate results like that is crazy. Yeah, I agree with you, it isn't, it's something that will speed up your workflow. I do think, however, when people make it out like it'll replace the photographer, that just isn't going to happen. I mean, take a wedding photographer as a prime example, they're out there capturing moments as they happen, and it's really those 'moments' people look back on and feel fond of, whereas, A.I. isn't about generating memories, it simply cannot achieve that. I'll tell you what would be good if they adapted it, if you were creating your own surreal photograph and shot all of your own material to put that together where it would be able to assist you putting it together, but at the current time I don't think it enables you to do so, instead, it merely generates things for you. For someone doing still life, if they forget to clear up some clutter, it can be useful for removing certain things like that. It's like you stated though, problem areas. Oh and as for the fake environment, correct, people who have visited the location many times would see it's fake for that reason. So it wouldn't work out in landscape in the same manner, plus it just doesn't feel right.
Embrace the technology. Overall I think this is awesome for creatives in general. However, for things like competitions we may need different classes and rules. Truly amazing, I just added some wild horses in a scene for added background fill. Loved it crazy good.
You are right Jerry, I think we have to do that. We at least have to know what the technology is capable of before we decide how much to use it. But as you have said, the options are limitless
Apparently Adobe and Sony are developing indelible metadata. Soon we'll see tags on social media much like "fake news" tags. This will become a novelty that will be exposed by purists, in my estimation.
For a mixed media project I made a series of images using my photography in AI model's Outpainting. Each image took me 3 days to create, with little sleep. It was a lot of fun, but still epic amounts of work. Not as much as making all the assets of images to create a composite, but still. To get the image to A3 I had to make it in selections and piece it together in PS. I have been waiting to complete my degree to play with that art style again. I'm delighted that Adobe have added this feature. It looks vastly more easier than the way I had to create my mixed media project. Plus love LOVE that they work with layers. To fix those faces is easy too, just delete that section of the AI generated layer to see the original image. It doesn't bother me that there are some glitches because overall workflow is now vastly faster.
Hi Neil, after it generates the 3 images, if you are not happy with any of them just hit generate again and it will give you another 3 to select from, keeping the original 3 also
Everybody in here is cheering today. Tomorrow, everybody in here is out of a job, or into a version of his/her job that no longer contains almost ANY type of work/activity that you actually enjoyed with Photoshop.
I was asked to update fashion photos from a company in Germany. One was adding a skateboard into the hand of a girl and I just selected the area the skateboard should have been and used the prompt: girl holding a skateboard with yellow wheels facing toward her body. Done just like that. I used to try and use MidJourney and create a detailed prompt that would do the same but it never worked.
Here is my plan....go back to pure black and white portraits with very minimal retouch and the other half of the work do the crazy ai thing,,,we need to redefine ourselves...iphones didnt totally cancel us out...this is one more crazy obstacle...good luck to my fellow photographers! Keep shooting no matter what!
I absolutely love it too for my property photography, removed some cars the other day at the front of a property and it was like they were never there!! #amazing
Will this remove the barrier for amateur photographers to get into professional work, such as weddings? Like this I can easily create a wedding photography portfolio without actually me shooting any bride/groom.
No, it cannot possibly achieve it, how could it? The main element of wedding photography is capturing moments that live on in their memory. Fake images can't replicate that even if you tried.
@@flixxfotojenslindner the thing is about amateur photographers, if anything will really help them, it's experience. If an amateur masters how to use ISO, shutter speed and aperture, they'll take a big step towards it. I'll tell you what this will really assist with; removing certain objects whilst retaining detail. This is something I'll definitely use in pet photography to remove leashes, etc.
Absolutely incredible tech for sure. What’s scarier is the waterfall photo of me and my wife, one of the versions the AI generated was literally how it looked in person. Nuts! I’m disappointed that Beth didn’t swim with a shark though 🤣
Its crazy. I was able to bring my parents photo from back in the ealry 90s back to life by giving them a extended backround and legs. Because the photo was cut in half, it now looked like it was the original photo taken from back then.
WOAH - The bride with the girl in pink. to create that from nothing. mind blown. even adding the foreground lamp. Jesus where will technology be in 30 years time. I thought content aware fill was mad, this new tool makes it look crap lol. Bloody hell
It's CRAZY isn't it mate?! I don't know how I even feel about this yet - I worry it will completely undermine the whole craft of photography. On the other hand there are limitless possibilities. I need sleep! 😂
Wow Wonderful demo Neil We will have to Adapt else we will Be left behind Some Images Can Be Retrieved Or Some Person Absent Can be added But Definitely Sad
I wouldn't say it changes photography forever... just means you dont needs to pay a retoucher for as long. They will just need to tweak the end results.
"This isn't clickbait", honestly the reactions of everyone I've seen use this are pretty well the same. Saving countless hours of time is a serious game changer.
I have tried this and for me this is artificial because the area you selecting prior to apply generative fill completely replaced by the cloud database and I have tried to apply GF to remove one person overlapping another in a photo and expected AI will generate overlapped bodyparts by observing rest of the visible body part but it is doing very poor job at this moment perhaps with time AI will improve but still that also will be synthetic....so with gradual improvement of AI we will lose the most precious originality and will miss manual work
It´s of course GOOOOOD! On the other side it could make our clients much more "So what? Can´t you change this and that`I heared it´s only a click!" - AND of course it could give deepfakes muuuuuch more possibilities and power. All themes we all have to deal with now.
Laughed out loud when photoshop replaced the foreground person with a random person... This tech genuinely worries me. Already, I get unreasonable photoshop requests that I basically refuse to do on the basis that im a documentary photographer and that it wouldnt be possible anyway (because i didnt know what was behind the object) - but as soon as clients get wind of this tech, I think that expectations/requests will skyrocket. There is no denying that when I need to use this feature it will be invaluable though...
I worry that clients may just ask to have a person shoot and deliver or where Cell phone technology is at just suggest someone else take photos and they fill in the gaps for what their imagination suits.. The industry is now completely disrupted by ones own subjectivity.
I mean that's pretty easy. Just encrypt the CCTV footage and only footage that has an intact encryption can be used as evidence. Should be pretty trivial for the manufacturer.
@@NorthgateLP I agree. It's the same for photography - we won't be able to trust as genuine ANY IMAGE (photo or video) that comes up on the mass media. There will be no reliable visual documentation of anything. We'll only be able to trust what we see with our own eyes (and not even that, in some cases). Such a fine technology to make our lives easier, right?
Should I just sell all of camera bodies, lenses and other expensive accessories???? (lol....) Maybe in few years, we just give a task to a bot to do a photoshoot for an event and it will do it's job of (a) Taking pics (b) Post-Process them and (c) Send it to everyone. OMG....
There are going to have to be new laws to deal with the possible illegal or unethical uses of this easy-to-use, powerful technology that can so realistically distort reality in photos. Perhaps each modified photo will need to be identified by a small mark at a specific place in the photo.
You kept saying “unbelievable” and “amazing”. Perhaps you should use ChatGpt to write a better script for you. Or, even to use AI to make this video entirely. Just a thought. 😂. Thank you for sharing.
Hey yeah it will change everything, we will now have more bad photoshop pics than ever. Photography hasn't changed a bit, you're using photography from Adobe stock library. It pulls in images that don't match your image resolution, color depth, or grading. All this is doing is changing how you look for stock pics, do it yourself or let adobe guess for you.
For me, the biggest breakthrough isn't the ability to add in new objects etc, it is the ability to clone out items which would have been almost impossible in the past, and the ability to stretch out images to new dimensions. It's incredible. I agree however that typing in something like "add a lion" isn't there yet. But it will be - scary
@@NeilRedfern I don't see how their stock library can compete with the other AI sites flat out stealing from the entire web for material, artist styles, etc. But anything away from the subject works good. Selection tool auto has always been bad with no improvement. Adobe is just chasing trends as usual without perfection what they are already renting out.
Another nail on the coffin of photography. I can't believe how can a pro be excited with this knowing that anyone is now a photographer and the unemployment line will be huge. This means the end of professional photography and photography in general. Nothing is believable from now on
I am on a mission to help have the average person know this is all hype on so many UA-cam channels. Adobe is desperately marketing a product (firefly) that is not ready and certainly not pro enough. The new replace tool is really pretty lame no matter how many youtube videos say it will change things forever....I realize these channels are getting paid to hype but, please, regular working digital artists put your hype filters on.....Firefly is about 18 months away from being a legit product.
Are you saying I am getting paid by Adobe? I wish! Haha, I am a full time wedding photographer and this is going to change the industry. Generative Fill's ability to create new content, allowing you to stretch images to any dimensions is already changing the game. Just to be clear I pay for Creative Cloud, I haven't been paid a penny for this video and have no communication with Adobe whatsoever. This is going to change the industry and I felt it right to inform my subscribers
Finally, I'll be able to deliver wedding images 2 weeks before their day happens
😂😂😂 brilliant!
Great video, but this tech is damn scary.
What's real anymore
Hahaha 😂
😂😂😂
Its way off from being perfect , thats for sure. I've selected subjects, then the inverse to change the background and after a new background generates, I can clearly see the edges , ears etc have been pulled into the background, now wearing spock ears etc and other weird phenomonen, so the select subject doesn't properly work, so that needs to be fixed.
I don't even know what to think about all of this to be honest! It's truly mind blowing and no doubt the biggest change to our industry since the switch to digital from film. It has huge potential for all creatives and certainly changes the game!
I couldn't agree more, I don't think we can underestimate how big this is. Especially when you consider that this is just the beginning. Crazy times!
Flashback to a wedding in 2021 when I had to remove the two videographers from in between the B&G in most of the ceremony photos because they would not move…. This tool could’ve saved me HOURS!!!
I might have to go back to those images just to try this tool and see how well it does compared to my painstakingly long photoshop work! Thanks sharing, Neil!
I have been using it to repair old ripped photos. I took a photo that I had tried to fix last year and spent four hours on reconstructing part of a face. The generative ai did it with one pass. I just used the lasso tool and selected the ripped area and done. I simple couldn't believe it.
I missed the stream but from that first image my mouth was on the floor. That is insane!
I just tried this myself and I am amazed as well. I don't know what the future will be for photography because if you look at a photo, you will then ask yourself, is it a real photo or is it an AI generated one? That is the part I don't like.
I completely agree Dee
Thank you for all of the examples. It's true, this opens the gate to a new genre.
I shouldn't comment as I watch as im just more stunned each time Neil haha. Removing that woman from the hug photo and then creating half a registrar from nothing. how on earth is this possible haha I need a lie down.
😂😂😂 don't worry mate, I am like you, just completely mind blown by it all. People would spend years learning Photoshop to try and do that, now we can do it in seconds 😱
@@NeilRedfern its the whole generating things without any reference as to what should be there like the registrar or the woman in the hug shot, creating flowers and railings. Jesus Christ
the beach scene problem was, you need to seperate them from the background first. like you would with the old way of filling the background. :) (perhaps keep feet if u want them blended)
Aaah, thank you!
I first dove into photography back in 1974 when I was 12 years old. My first camera was my father's Agfa rangefinder camera. I then graduated big-time when my father graciously bought me a brand new Nikon F2A in 1978. Everything about those film cameras was manual, including the exposure and the focus. I considered myself a "photographer" or "picture taker" back then. I then got into doing b/w darkroom work, which made me question whether I was still a "picture taker" or a "picture maker". But...Ansel Adams' photos incorporated a lot of darkroom work, so I didn't feel so bad when I thought that way. I then went digital and started using Photoshop in the '90s. Today, I'm doing even more amazing things with Photoshop and have considered myself a "picture maker" since I became fairly good at using Photoshop. But this Generative Fill just takes photography to a level beyond our wildest imaginations, as you so rightly pointed-out. And you're also right by saying we can never trust another picture we see from this point forward! I shudder to think about photos that will start cropping-up in the already heated political arena! Thanks for creating this video. It was quite eye-opening to say the least!
you see me speechles, fascinated and... just speechless! First question which come sinto my mind: How will the competitions be able to control, which photo was heavily manipulated and which not? this is so crazy
You are having the exact thoughts and feelings that I am - it's so much to try and get your head around!
It's a game changer, but it questions all we do as photographers. Downloading now to give it a try. Thanks again Neil!
I have been playing with this all day....its CRAZY!!!!!!!!!!
I agree!
Mind blown... it's a game changer for all creative industries and much bigger for photographers than the move from analogue to digital. People will still want authentic, real moments BUT the hero shots, the OCF portraits etc... you can create most on PS after the wedding has finished. Great video - thanks.
Love your excitement on day 1. Would love to see another video after a few months on how much you might have used this feature by then.
Thank you, I will do :) I wouldn't say excitement, more astonishment! I don't know how I feel about it overall, there are very useful aspects to it, but there are also lots of negatives that come with it too. I will definitely be making more videos on this though as it is going to change the industry, I have no doubts about that
@@NeilRedfern I agree with astonishment.
I take this opportunity to thank you for teaching me so much on UA-cam.
It could affect people in commercial photography, but it will never replace the real photography, for example; wedding shoots, pet photography or anything of that nature. The reason being is because the biggest part of photography people are forgetting is to do with painting the character by capturing actual real moments. Sure, you could tell this technology to take the dog and give it this specific characteristic, but it's still fake. A real photograph is capturing something genuine, an actual moment that people can look back on and that cannot be replicated by A.I.
I would certainly use this to make adjustments to "problem areas" in a photo that I want to fix. How is that any different than us going in with our clone stamp tools, healing brushes, etc? I would never use it to completely artificially make an image or have the faked item be used as the centerpiece of the image. I also would never use it for putting people in areas where they really weren't. For example, I wouldn't take a photo of someone near a waterfall and then use it to create a completely faked environment to make the image bigger. It's something I would merely use as a "touch up" tool on my photos.
@@mpetrie, yes, as someone who is a pet photographer, to me this is ideal for certain things like removing objects, it's more powerful.
I think problem areas like you've mentioned would be interesting to see the results of for what it will achieve.
I tested it yesterday, it seems it is still a bit buggy where you can see the seems from where it's added on, but it's early days and given the fact it's able to generate results like that is crazy.
Yeah, I agree with you, it isn't, it's something that will speed up your workflow. I do think, however, when people make it out like it'll replace the photographer, that just isn't going to happen. I mean, take a wedding photographer as a prime example, they're out there capturing moments as they happen, and it's really those 'moments' people look back on and feel fond of, whereas, A.I. isn't about generating memories, it simply cannot achieve that.
I'll tell you what would be good if they adapted it, if you were creating your own surreal photograph and shot all of your own material to put that together where it would be able to assist you putting it together, but at the current time I don't think it enables you to do so, instead, it merely generates things for you.
For someone doing still life, if they forget to clear up some clutter, it can be useful for removing certain things like that. It's like you stated though, problem areas.
Oh and as for the fake environment, correct, people who have visited the location many times would see it's fake for that reason. So it wouldn't work out in landscape in the same manner, plus it just doesn't feel right.
Embrace the technology. Overall I think this is awesome for creatives in general. However, for things like competitions we may need different classes and rules. Truly amazing, I just added some wild horses in a scene for added background fill. Loved it crazy good.
You are right Jerry, I think we have to do that. We at least have to know what the technology is capable of before we decide how much to use it. But as you have said, the options are limitless
Apparently Adobe and Sony are developing indelible metadata. Soon we'll see tags on social media much like "fake news" tags. This will become a novelty that will be exposed by purists, in my estimation.
For a mixed media project I made a series of images using my photography in AI model's Outpainting. Each image took me 3 days to create, with little sleep. It was a lot of fun, but still epic amounts of work. Not as much as making all the assets of images to create a composite, but still. To get the image to A3 I had to make it in selections and piece it together in PS.
I have been waiting to complete my degree to play with that art style again. I'm delighted that Adobe have added this feature. It looks vastly more easier than the way I had to create my mixed media project.
Plus love LOVE that they work with layers. To fix those faces is easy too, just delete that section of the AI generated layer to see the original image. It doesn't bother me that there are some glitches because overall workflow is now vastly faster.
Hi Neil, after it generates the 3 images, if you are not happy with any of them just hit generate again and it will give you another 3 to select from, keeping the original 3 also
I didn't know that - thank you very much Dean!
Everybody in here is cheering today. Tomorrow, everybody in here is out of a job, or into a version of his/her job that no longer contains almost ANY type of work/activity that you actually enjoyed with Photoshop.
the fact even with just the ring on finger it had the light reflecting off the ring onto the other finger was incredible.
I agree! It’s amazing how well it simulates the correct direction of light and shadows that are present in the base image. Just wow!
Bonkers mate. What incredible technology.
I agree - it's crazy what we can do now!
This is nuts! It's going to be such a game changer! 🤯
Totally agree - it's mind blowing stuff
I was asked to update fashion photos from a company in Germany. One was adding a skateboard into the hand of a girl and I just selected the area the skateboard should have been and used the prompt: girl holding a skateboard with yellow wheels facing toward her body. Done just like that. I used to try and use MidJourney and create a detailed prompt that would do the same but it never worked.
Wowza!! Great example video mate! The potential of this is insane, and like you rightly said, this is just the very beginning of this new journey...
Thank you very much mate!
Oh my! That’s madness. Going to give this a go with some older photos
It is indeed Kim! Absolute madness 😂
Dude, you look pretty good for having your mind literally blown. No mess at all! :)
Or did I clean it up the mess afterwards using AI....? 😂
Here is my plan....go back to pure black and white portraits with very minimal retouch and the other half of the work do the crazy ai thing,,,we need to redefine ourselves...iphones didnt totally cancel us out...this is one more crazy obstacle...good luck to my fellow photographers! Keep shooting no matter what!
Thank You So much ❤
I absolutely love it too for my property photography, removed some cars the other day at the front of a property and it was like they were never there!! #amazing
It's Frickin Fantastic !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Will this remove the barrier for amateur photographers to get into professional work, such as weddings? Like this I can easily create a wedding photography portfolio without actually me shooting any bride/groom.
No, it cannot possibly achieve it, how could it? The main element of wedding photography is capturing moments that live on in their memory. Fake images can't replicate that even if you tried.
No, of course not. An amateur photographer will be an amateur in every universe.
@@flixxfotojenslindner the thing is about amateur photographers, if anything will really help them, it's experience. If an amateur masters how to use ISO, shutter speed and aperture, they'll take a big step towards it.
I'll tell you what this will really assist with; removing certain objects whilst retaining detail. This is something I'll definitely use in pet photography to remove leashes, etc.
Absolutely incredible tech for sure. What’s scarier is the waterfall photo of me and my wife, one of the versions the AI generated was literally how it looked in person. Nuts!
I’m disappointed that Beth didn’t swim with a shark though 🤣
Have to agree this is so much going to be a game changer
SHUT THE FRONT DOOR - that's mental mate
This!
Good morning, Neil! holy cow!!!
Morning Christoforos!
This is kickass
Its crazy. I was able to bring my parents photo from back in the ealry 90s back to life by giving them a extended backround and legs. Because the photo was cut in half, it now looked like it was the original photo taken from back then.
I love that!! It's really nice to hear a really positive outcome of this - that's lovely :)
WOAH - The bride with the girl in pink. to create that from nothing. mind blown. even adding the foreground lamp. Jesus where will technology be in 30 years time. I thought content aware fill was mad, this new tool makes it look crap lol. Bloody hell
It's CRAZY isn't it mate?! I don't know how I even feel about this yet - I worry it will completely undermine the whole craft of photography. On the other hand there are limitless possibilities. I need sleep! 😂
Wow Wonderful demo Neil
We will have to Adapt else we will
Be left behind
Some Images Can Be Retrieved
Or Some Person Absent Can be added
But Definitely Sad
and when Neil gets excited... the rest of the photography world gets excited too...
Good grief - that's just nuts!
*While this is a great advantage for beginners and amateurs, this will replace or eliminate jobs for real*
brilliant!
Thank you!
OMG!!!!! I´m sitting here and cant breathe anymore... WTF?
I wouldn't say it changes photography forever... just means you dont needs to pay a retoucher for as long. They will just need to tweak the end results.
👏🏾🙌🏾💪🏾📸Game changer
It really is!
Lets all remember to use Disclaimers in our work. So that we can merge with the new tech. Or maybe a sort of watermark showing the changes. Terry
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's the beginning of composite art and augmented imaging. The camera will take on a new role.
sorry but composite art has been around for years!! this just makes it easier and quicker!
"This isn't clickbait", honestly the reactions of everyone I've seen use this are pretty well the same. Saving countless hours of time is a serious game changer.
That's exactly right Zachariah. I honestly think this is the biggest change to the industry since the introduction of DSLRs -
Damn, now imagine when they add an image-to-image generative fill feature!
That is REALLY scary!
WOW!
Yep!
But in what resolution you can save? Is it limited ?
Hello sir , From where can i download Photoshop Beta ?
Sounds like he's saying
This is ON believable
Its amazing, but takes up a lot of drive space.
Wow!
Ive started calling myself a photographic Artist
its absolutely wild! Now Photoshop can do what clients always thought it can do. just remove stuff lol.
To add, i cant wait for people to try to submit stuff like this for awards lol.
Haha, so true TJ!
The awards issue is a whole new can of worms!
I have tried this and for me this is artificial because the area you selecting prior to apply generative fill completely replaced by the cloud database and I have tried to apply GF to remove one person overlapping another in a photo and expected AI will generate overlapped bodyparts by observing rest of the visible body part but it is doing very poor job at this moment perhaps with time AI will improve but still that also will be synthetic....so with gradual improvement of AI we will lose the most precious originality and will miss manual work
30 euros per month ! the subscribtion .. most amateur photographers can't afford it
It´s of course GOOOOOD! On the other side it could make our clients much more "So what? Can´t you change this and that`I heared it´s only a click!" - AND of course it could give deepfakes muuuuuch more possibilities and power. All themes we all have to deal with now.
I totally agree with you - it will be change what we do and how we work in the future I am sure. Scary and exciting at the same time!
Laughed out loud when photoshop replaced the foreground person with a random person...
This tech genuinely worries me. Already, I get unreasonable photoshop requests that I basically refuse to do on the basis that im a documentary photographer and that it wouldnt be possible anyway (because i didnt know what was behind the object) - but as soon as clients get wind of this tech, I think that expectations/requests will skyrocket.
There is no denying that when I need to use this feature it will be invaluable though...
I worry that clients may just ask to have a person shoot and deliver or where Cell phone technology is at just suggest someone else take photos and they fill in the gaps for what their imagination suits.. The industry is now completely disrupted by ones own subjectivity.
FUCKING MIND BLOWING.
THIS!
Wow, Adobe is not kidding.
It really isn't - this is a HUGE leap forward
Imagine in the not too distance future you can ask it to place a person in CCTV video committing a crime. What is real and what is not?
Wow, I hadn't thought of that. This technology in the wrong hands is genuinely scary
I mean that's pretty easy. Just encrypt the CCTV footage and only footage that has an intact encryption can be used as evidence. Should be pretty trivial for the manufacturer.
@@NorthgateLP I agree. It's the same for photography - we won't be able to trust as genuine ANY IMAGE (photo or video) that comes up on the mass media. There will be no reliable visual documentation of anything. We'll only be able to trust what we see with our own eyes (and not even that, in some cases). Such a fine technology to make our lives easier, right?
I N S A N E !!!🎉
Yep!
Lightroom preset site doesn't work?
I have just tried it and it seems to work - can I please ask you to try again?
I had this problem yesterday. There are two beta versions downloadable - one doesn't have this feature. Make sure you have the right beta.
It's a new world to wake up to. I'll chose to embrace it and not discharge it. (This line is not written by me) 😜
Should I just sell all of camera bodies, lenses and other expensive accessories???? (lol....) Maybe in few years, we just give a task to a bot to do a photoshoot for an event and it will do it's job of (a) Taking pics (b) Post-Process them and (c) Send it to everyone. OMG....
Unbelievable!
That's the correct word!
remove face tattoo. haha amazing posibilities. thx for the presentation.
This won't change photography because this is not photography, even if I don't use AI
There are going to have to be new laws to deal with the possible illegal or unethical uses of this easy-to-use, powerful technology that can so realistically distort reality in photos. Perhaps each modified photo will need to be identified by a small mark at a specific place in the photo.
Finally a quick way to get rid of those bloody toast masters that wreck all the speeches shots.
Haha! You said it 😂😇
Better than midjourney or playground, but still trying to do their best with hands.
6:20 Is this a joke? The ring even has a reflection on the finger.
It's crazy isn't it?!
@@NeilRedfern Absolutely!
I don't know what to say?!
I know exactly what you mean - it's crazy!
😎🤝
Fucking wow
That about sums it up! 😂
Adobe will be the next Kodak, shoot one self in the leg !
.
( kodak invented digital camera and caused the end of it's own film business empire )
The wow-word just got old.
You kept saying “unbelievable” and “amazing”. Perhaps you should use ChatGpt to write a better script for you. Or, even to use AI to make this video entirely. Just a thought. 😂. Thank you for sharing.
Hey yeah it will change everything, we will now have more bad photoshop pics than ever. Photography hasn't changed a bit, you're using photography from Adobe stock library. It pulls in images that don't match your image resolution, color depth, or grading. All this is doing is changing how you look for stock pics, do it yourself or let adobe guess for you.
For me, the biggest breakthrough isn't the ability to add in new objects etc, it is the ability to clone out items which would have been almost impossible in the past, and the ability to stretch out images to new dimensions. It's incredible. I agree however that typing in something like "add a lion" isn't there yet. But it will be - scary
@@NeilRedfern I don't see how their stock library can compete with the other AI sites flat out stealing from the entire web for material, artist styles, etc. But anything away from the subject works good. Selection tool auto has always been bad with no improvement. Adobe is just chasing trends as usual without perfection what they are already renting out.
Stop calling it photography 😢
I literally state at 4.00 that this "isn't really photography anymore, this is image making"
Well (or bad) this is no more photography, just photo editing……
Ok, I get your excitement. Don't overdo it. It ruins the message !!! For that reason I didn't watch it to the end !
Amazing? Not at all, it's fake.
Of course it's fake, but don't you think the fact technology is capable of this is amazing? I do.
@@NeilRedfern no it's not amazing. it's fake, scary and sad.
Killing professional world a lot of people will cry. Not a good thing.
I agree with you - I think you can tell my thoughts at the end of the video
Another nail on the coffin of photography. I can't believe how can a pro be excited with this knowing that anyone is now a photographer and the unemployment line will be huge. This means the end of professional photography and photography in general. Nothing is believable from now on
Just for info It’s pronounced beeeeeta. Yanks pronounce it wrong as bay ta.
i like bay ta better bet you have fun with bow ka
My audience are primarily based in the US
I am on a mission to help have the average person know this is all hype on so many UA-cam channels. Adobe is desperately marketing a product (firefly) that is not ready and certainly not pro enough. The new replace tool is really pretty lame no matter how many youtube videos say it will change things forever....I realize these channels are getting paid to hype but, please, regular working digital artists put your hype filters on.....Firefly is about 18 months away from being a legit product.
Are you saying I am getting paid by Adobe? I wish! Haha, I am a full time wedding photographer and this is going to change the industry. Generative Fill's ability to create new content, allowing you to stretch images to any dimensions is already changing the game. Just to be clear I pay for Creative Cloud, I haven't been paid a penny for this video and have no communication with Adobe whatsoever. This is going to change the industry and I felt it right to inform my subscribers
3:00 am is very late, while 4:00 am is very early 😎🥱
It has nothing to do with photography, literally. The only thing this will change is more repetitive, randomly generated shit around.