This is not really my area of interest specifically, although i follow various computer related content. What actually shocked me, after watching several videos, is how orderly mind this lady has. Absolutely smooth speaking about complicated topics. I envy that talent so much.
I know this from my own experience, and it is quite obvious, but the ability to speak so flawlessly is not something most people can achieve. At least it requires proper growing up process, as in mature age you cannot reverse enoughly the way your brain was formed.
I'm a backend dev and have never dug into malware analysis, but this video made the process look pretty fun and rewarding. I guess it is just a big dangerous puzzle
holy effing sht. I literally just came across some heavily obfuscated js code that i am dying to reverse engineer and this vid came up. there is a god.
@@Katchi_ Not even kidding. I am using a complex optimization app and instead of it doing work on the server it just sends a giant minified obfuscated js bundle. And I am curious although not as smart as Laurie and will prob never fully reverse engineer it. So far the only thing I am getting is that the code using the glpk javascript library. I didn't even know this existed so that's a bonus at least. I am guessing there will soon be a day where most of the python AI/ML library functionalities are in javascript and running in your browser without (most people) you being aware. I am unsure if i should be excited or petrified.
I'm a complete code mong, so I'm trying to "hang around" with smart people to soak up as much as I can - hence, why I'm here. Just to prove I was paying attention: 28:30 It looks like the integer returned was "1". You went back to the code and typed "0". Thanks for the walkthrough of what you're doing - Picked up a couple of tricks here.
The theme is from Serial Experiments Lain. great anime - only like 13 episodes. Would recommend watching if you have the time. I will warn you tho - it's a trip.
These videos are really well made. I've tried to make educational content a few times before but never really landed on a good style or way to do things. You've inspired me to give it another shot
The quality of these videos is just great, I'm not into JS at all, but it's well explained to follow along, nice! It all feels very much like security through obscurity, I predict this can be automated in the near future.
Your production value is through the roof, you've got the whole room setup, the multiple cameras, the old Mac aesthetic. And you're great at this! This is amazing
This channel is really phenomenal. Everything from the technical aspect and way you break everything down in a clear and precise manner, the way you articulate yourself clearly, the synthwave color schemes and background setup is epic… I love all the things! Favorite channel lately :-) You are very knowledgeable and talented and it shows. Thank you for sharing your knowledge!
@@kxmode the thing is, she's _in_ the "console" (in other languages, it might get called the REPL -- Read, Evaluate, Print (in a Loop)), so, as plato4ek says, it's not really isolating anything in this context. What she's doing isn't harming anything, of course, it's just also not buying much when done interactively. (But it would be very useful if recording it to a file and running it with node, say, so, perhaps it's a habit born from such intentions in prior work.)
Thank you Laurie for another really nice video. It was really interesting watching the source unwind into something readable. To bad these malware writers don't use their talents for something more positive.
Love the video! It kind of inspired me to want to do something like this myself. One thing to note, you don't really need console.log() if it's a function because the return value will be automatically logged. Keep up the work!
A true gem for anyone passionate about unraveling the mysteries! This step-by-step approach to deobfuscating and reverse engineering an obfuscated JavaScript file is not just informative, but downright thrilling. I love how Laurie invites viewers to follow along with the truth provided. Simply invaluable! 💻🔍✨
You've done a great job of presenting this in a clear way that makes an otherwise daunting endeavor make a lot more sense. Of course, your intuition about what the code is doing is a major factor, and that can only be developed with experience and persistence...
Well done! Quick tip: You don't need to use console.log to evaluate expressions. You can just paste the expression and evaluate it directly. Also, at 22:56, you could evaluate the whole object in one step, instead of doing one function call at a time.
I haven't done this type of stuff in forever. Great video and a fun romp through reverse engineering malware. Great Job, you've earned a new subscriber!
Great video. I was hoping at the end you’d also say “and if you wanted to skip all that process you could just replace the ActiveX line with console.log to see exactly what it’s trying to execute without going through the whole process of untangling it.”
I don't deal with programming much (or js) as I'm a hardware guy, but I found this super interesting to watch, and I understood most of it! Keep up the good work pretty lady!
Pretty cool to see the malware "come to life" with deobsfucation. I probably would have just run the object as a single line that was getting all the commands, since it ended up putting them into a simple object structure that would be easy to copy out from, but that's just a speed-up of the process. I'd be interested to see a _more_ obsfucated piece of code. Some of the fun stuff I've seen is single letter function/variable names, an extensive use of hex codes, as well as the oft broken eval().
I found this very interesting, I noticed a small err on 28:39 I deobfucated a piece of js a few years ago. I find it very interesting to see someone else do it on there way.
Very nice presentation and clear patient explanation etc as others have said. A few little comments: you don't really need to type `console.log` the whole time; just execute the expression in devtools and the value will be printed. Some of the more manual bits could be done in fewer steps, like building the map of commands - I'd probably just execute that block of code and grab the output rather than manually substituting each part. Lastly, it's vaguely hypothetically possible that using a find/replace to rename things could end up with the wrong result if the same set of characters happened to be used elsewhere (which in larger files is really not so unlikely as bundlers aiming for small output are pretty likely to reuse similar short variable names in different scopes). If you were to use an editor with a js language server you can use a more dedicated 'rename variable' function (F2 in vscode) to do that a bit more safely.
The horizontally flipped front face camera has had me wondering exactly what you were doing for a couple of videos. Did you decide to do it to have your face "looking into" the direction of the code? Now that I'm commenting, I'll just say: I love the graphic overlays and design you use. And the way you present these videos, just clear voice, no music, well prepared, and sitting still and straight throughout the whole thing, My respects. I know how all of these kind of things are invisible to most when done correctly, but cheers, it doesn't go un-appreciated.
Webcams and front-facing phone cameras tend to mirror the image to emulate.. well, a mirror, since that's how most people are used to seeing themselves.
@@Hwyadylaw but that footage looks like a real camera, not a webcam, which is why it seems to me like it must be an active decision and not just the default thing the camera does.
Something to save a little time for you: console.log is not required in the console tools. just press enter on an expression, you'll see the result right after. this is why you see undefined print after your result on its own line, it prints the return value automatically. :)
At 23:06... If your ultimate goal was to get the _0x502708 map object, couldn't you have executed that block in your dev tools and just printed it out? Especially since you know the method was just outputting string characters and was not inherently malicious. Please correct me if there is something I'm overlooking here. Just a gut reaction at a potential time save Also this video was beautiful and I love your editing style. This is incredibly educational and I have subscribed. Looking forward to seeing more of your thought process.
I'm guessing she did it this way to keep it safe and accessible for the viewers. A viewer might not be savvy enough to distinguish which parts of the code are safe to execute and which are not. That would also explain why she would go through de-obfuscating the first two methods before using them even though they, to me, obviously had no code that could do harm. A viewer following the workflow in this video will not get their system infected.
One interesting piece you skipped over was the use of the split fuction on the string. It was accessed as a property on the string, which let them store the name of the function "split" outside of code as a string. It didn't really do much obsfucating here, but it could do a lot with a more complex object. Oh, and !![] and ![] could further deobsfucate to true and false 😅
It's been a few decades since I've done anything serious on Windows, so I was frankly surprised to learn that ActiveX is still a thing. We all thought it was a gaping security hole from day one, and I thought Microsoft was at-least disabling it by default now. Glad to see that it's deprecated (according to Wikipedia).
9:06 that’s a mistake. if the app is writing to the arrays content, you basically made it readonly. enhanced obfuscation also messes with data storage location and could use morphing source code
Great video - these are all tricks I've used to deobfuscate API's I probs shouldn't be using .-. If you know the code is safe to run, and have a bit more complex code that jumps thru many different libraries, executing and walking thru the code line by line helps a tone, What you maybe reverse engineering maybe just one file, but seeing the external lib calls and filling in the values returned just like in the video rlly helps put the puzzle together, (of course gotta give props to browser Dev tools - when walking thru code can just hover over any variable to see the current value inside)
This is some seriously cool stuff. Subscribed :) I loved seeing when the camera angle changed, it seems you really do have a bunch of old monitors buzzing away back there haha!
You can invoke the expressions directly in devtools, instead of surounding it with console.log, if you do not surround it you will get the real string in dev friendly format, string parameters to console log are displayed as html in console losing whitespace information
You can also use VSCode with typescript language server, this will allow you to rename while respecting scope in cases which obfuscator might use the same var name for different values
brill!i feel like deobfuscating js code is a great exercise for a beginner as all source code is right there, just looking a tiny bit messier than a regular js code
I've seen obfuscated JS code that includes bit shifting, which is insanely difficult to reverse engineering. For example: // Original Code let result = 160; // Obfuscated Code let result = (5
Your kind is rare. I am working on a C decompiler, and will soon deal with optimized binaries and later with static obfuscation methods and I am thinking on how to automate deobfuscation. For JS it looks quite possible. You are basically doing some kind of constant propagation (with the help of runtime logs) and give sensible names. If someone would write a high-level JS optimizer, you could also get rid of unneccessary/pointless dead code, control flow, ... then its done. Basically adapting the GCC/CLANG optimization tricks to JS would make no JS secure.
I'm stupid but why are you able to find + replace-all? Doesn't that risk renaming variables that are locally scoped that use the same name as other locally scoped variables in another function? edit: like obviously it'd still work, I just feel like it'd mess with me a lot and it seems like it'd be better if the find-replace was scoped but idk, I don't RE malware.
Yeah, I too thought that was a little "reckless". Turned out this code didn't use the same name in different scopes but it could have, just to mess with reverse engineers.
Yes! I was wondering the same thing. I've messed up my own code so many times changing variable names with replaceAll. VSCode lets you rename variables automatically without messing up scope (and without affecting non-variable strings, which replaceAll can also mess up). The video creator is very smart, but not working the smartest way in this video
I did this my job 1 or 2 years ago. Javascript is used a everywhere and obfuscated in very horrendous way. For me it was fun and even did some helper to avoid wasting too much time. As you cannot do this automaticaly, you have to do a lot of staff manually, finding the obfuscation fonctions is the most annoying part.
I am using the same tool, the guy uses javascript-obfuscator. You are lucky the code is short, otherwise you need to make something for complex to retrieve all the strings.
3:45 The big array at line 80 looks like it'll be reassembled into a command to run a WShell script. I knew this wouldn't run in a browser because they no longer support ActiveX controls.
Nice work, Laurie. Of course there are many shortcuts possible all over the place, but that also increases the risk of errors. Refactoring piece by piece provides more confidence that you're on the right track. Is the original code available somewhere? I couldn't find it with just the hash.
Hello, i would recommend to the people watching this video to use a JavaScript AST manipulation tool for this kind of de-obfuscation. Just with "copy propagation" and "constant folding" you will have much done in one go. The switch technique however is maybe not handled as it would require loop unroll.
Your background / set is a trip dude. Is all that retro gear real or are you using a greenscreen of some sort? If it’s real then you’ve got a really cool collection of… old computer stuff hahah
9:19 The function is kind of doing what you're saying but not exactly. In the obfuscated version it's always returning the same instance of the string array. In the obfuscated version you're recreating the string array every time. So if you mutate the result of the obfuscated function, you'll get the mutated version on the next call. This is not the case in the obfuscated one. A way to reproduce what it actually does is move the declaration of the var_commandStringArray to the top of the file and just return the reference in the function. This would allow you to replace all calls to _0x1ecc() by var_commandStringArray and get rid of the function.
This is not really my area of interest specifically, although i follow various computer related content.
What actually shocked me, after watching several videos, is how orderly mind this lady has. Absolutely smooth speaking about complicated topics.
I envy that talent so much.
it takes a lot of years of practice in problem solving and critial thinking, like a lot
I know this from my own experience, and it is quite obvious, but the ability to speak so flawlessly is not something most people can achieve. At least it requires proper growing up process, as in mature age you cannot reverse enoughly the way your brain was formed.
I'm a backend dev and have never dug into malware analysis, but this video made the process look pretty fun and rewarding. I guess it is just a big dangerous puzzle
very lucky
holy effing sht. I literally just came across some heavily obfuscated js code that i am dying to reverse engineer and this vid came up. there is a god.
Or maybe Big Brother is tracking you. Who knows? 😕
wtf, almost the same here. A client just called me because a js file was triggering a virus alert in windows defender. And here I am 🥸
Liar.
@@Katchi_ Not even kidding. I am using a complex optimization app and instead of it doing work on the server it just sends a giant minified obfuscated js bundle. And I am curious although not as smart as Laurie and will prob never fully reverse engineer it.
So far the only thing I am getting is that the code using the glpk javascript library. I didn't even know this existed so that's a bonus at least. I am guessing there will soon be a day where most of the python AI/ML library functionalities are in javascript and running in your browser without (most people) you being aware. I am unsure if i should be excited or petrified.
@@adityadas5835 certainly possible.
I'm a complete code mong, so I'm trying to "hang around" with smart people to soak up as much as I can - hence, why I'm here.
Just to prove I was paying attention:
28:30
It looks like the integer returned was "1".
You went back to the code and typed "0".
Thanks for the walkthrough of what you're doing - Picked up a couple of tricks here.
yep, saw that as well
It's a bait
I literally winced when I saw that.
Gawd, paused the video and angrily looked for this comment :)
@@Urgleflogue same
One of my new favorite channels! I love the old school Tech Tv/G4 vibe of your set.
The theme is from Serial Experiments Lain.
great anime - only like 13 episodes. Would recommend watching if you have the time. I will warn you tho - it's a trip.
Not to mention the Classic Mac (Copland/OS 8-9.2) theming.
I did't need this but the explanation was so clear I kept watching
These videos are really well made. I've tried to make educational content a few times before but never really landed on a good style or way to do things. You've inspired me to give it another shot
Obfuscated code is fun.. JavaScript not so much my cup of tea 😊 Thanks for presenting these topics!
How can you like obfuscated code but not love javascript?
The quality of these videos is just great, I'm not into JS at all, but it's well explained to follow along, nice! It all feels very much like security through obscurity, I predict this can be automated in the near future.
@28:29 a little error here ;-) pasting 0 instead of the 1
^ 28:41
yeah this is a bug in this video
Comment bait 🎉
Your production value is through the roof, you've got the whole room setup, the multiple cameras, the old Mac aesthetic. And you're great at this! This is amazing
Nice, I was looking for a nice detailed video that goes through such an annoying obfuscation in JavaScript. Thanks!
Laurie, your voice and way to explain is gorgeous!! New favorite channel! Im a simple FE developer who loves non FE content :) Thank you for exists!
This channel is really phenomenal. Everything from the technical aspect and way you break everything down in a clear and precise manner, the way you articulate yourself clearly, the synthwave color schemes and background setup is epic… I love all the things! Favorite channel lately :-)
You are very knowledgeable and talented and it shows. Thank you for sharing your knowledge!
20:39 and other places: you don't need to write the "console.log", just expression itself is okay.
Exactly, the console will output the result of that expression, instead of those "undefined"s.
I think she's being extra careful to isolate the output to the console
@@kxmode this won't help isolate anything. Everything inside the "console.log()" is being evaluated anyway.
@@kxmode the thing is, she's _in_ the "console" (in other languages, it might get called the REPL -- Read, Evaluate, Print (in a Loop)), so, as plato4ek says, it's not really isolating anything in this context. What she's doing isn't harming anything, of course, it's just also not buying much when done interactively. (But it would be very useful if recording it to a file and running it with node, say, so, perhaps it's a habit born from such intentions in prior work.)
@@DavidLindes hmm... good to know. always thought console.log was a way to sandbox the code. A good note to self.
Thank you Laurie for another really nice video. It was really interesting watching the source unwind into something readable. To bad these malware writers don't use their talents for something more positive.
Love the video! It kind of inspired me to want to do something like this myself. One thing to note, you don't really need console.log() if it's a function because the return value will be automatically logged. Keep up the work!
The set in the background is awesome!
A true gem for anyone passionate about unraveling the mysteries! This step-by-step approach to deobfuscating and reverse engineering an obfuscated JavaScript file is not just informative, but downright thrilling. I love how Laurie invites viewers to follow along with the truth provided. Simply invaluable! 💻🔍✨
what's the point of using chatgpt to comment on a youtube video?
@@timolff9239 ChatGPT's English is better than mine. I couldn't have possibly articulated my feelings towards this video better than it did!
But everyone can tell it's AI so we think it's fake. Also I think claude opus has more natural speaking
@@AEONIC_MUSIC Well, it is fake in the sense that I was not the one who worded everything, but I did tell ChatGPT what I felt!
@@timolff9239 😂
Wow, just found your channel and I love it. Your presentation style is amazing!
Super neat video, really high level of production (also, 28:37, oopsie daisies the 1!) :P
Really awesome content, learnt a lot Laurie! Subbed :)
You did a really good job with the style of your videos
I'm ecstatic I just found this channel! TYSM for sharing skills and methods like this on the Internet for free! Also the little corgi made my day!!
You've done a great job of presenting this in a clear way that makes an otherwise daunting endeavor make a lot more sense. Of course, your intuition about what the code is doing is a major factor, and that can only be developed with experience and persistence...
Awesome video Laurie, I learned a lot by watching your well explained videos. Thank you.
Well done!
Quick tip: You don't need to use console.log to evaluate expressions. You can just paste the expression and evaluate it directly.
Also, at 22:56, you could evaluate the whole object in one step, instead of doing one function call at a time.
I haven't done this type of stuff in forever. Great video and a fun romp through reverse engineering malware. Great Job, you've earned a new subscriber!
Fantastic! I would love a video from you breaking down the XZ backdoor thing.
That's what I thought at first too😅
Love your Serial Experiments: Lain theme
Great video. I was hoping at the end you’d also say “and if you wanted to skip all that process you could just replace the ActiveX line with console.log to see exactly what it’s trying to execute without going through the whole process of untangling it.”
ActiveX! Blast from the past! Run random COM objects from the browser! What could _possibly_ go wrong? Loved watching you pick this apart :-)
Such great videos! (Love the Burnout clips at the end of each videos such a fun a game!)
Not a big fan of Lain, but still can appreciate the committment to the intros
I don't deal with programming much (or js) as I'm a hardware guy, but I found this super interesting to watch, and I understood most of it! Keep up the good work pretty lady!
Pretty cool to see the malware "come to life" with deobsfucation. I probably would have just run the object as a single line that was getting all the commands, since it ended up putting them into a simple object structure that would be easy to copy out from, but that's just a speed-up of the process.
I'd be interested to see a _more_ obsfucated piece of code. Some of the fun stuff I've seen is single letter function/variable names, an extensive use of hex codes, as well as the oft broken eval().
This was a lot of fun! What a cool breakdown.
Clear, concise, and cool as hell. You picked a great code example!
I found this very interesting,
I noticed a small err on 28:39
I deobfucated a piece of js a few years ago.
I find it very interesting to see someone else do it on there way.
Sometimes you get lucky with Auto-play enabled, that's how I found this video which I enjoyed. Love the retro feeling!
I love this. It's amazing how obfuscation can make it look so much more complex than it really is.
Yea the way it all boiled down at the end to just a few lines of code was pretty cool.
Learned some obscure (to me) JS syntax today. Cool.
Thank you for covering IOCCC. Something I always encourage aspiring programmers to try for themselves first the personal challenge and discipline. 🙏
A lot of interesting insights, great job as usual!
👍
This is the first (maybe second) os your videos I watch, and I got the reference. シリアルエクスペリメンツレイン
I like the channel, it has a 90's style vibe from PBS after school tv educational shows which gives me that nostalgic vibe
Very nice presentation and clear patient explanation etc as others have said. A few little comments: you don't really need to type `console.log` the whole time; just execute the expression in devtools and the value will be printed. Some of the more manual bits could be done in fewer steps, like building the map of commands - I'd probably just execute that block of code and grab the output rather than manually substituting each part.
Lastly, it's vaguely hypothetically possible that using a find/replace to rename things could end up with the wrong result if the same set of characters happened to be used elsewhere (which in larger files is really not so unlikely as bundlers aiming for small output are pretty likely to reuse similar short variable names in different scopes). If you were to use an editor with a js language server you can use a more dedicated 'rename variable' function (F2 in vscode) to do that a bit more safely.
this was so good to watch, the quality of production is amazing
The horizontally flipped front face camera has had me wondering exactly what you were doing for a couple of videos.
Did you decide to do it to have your face "looking into" the direction of the code?
Now that I'm commenting, I'll just say: I love the graphic overlays and design you use. And the way you present these videos, just clear voice, no music, well prepared, and sitting still and straight throughout the whole thing,
My respects. I know how all of these kind of things are invisible to most when done correctly, but cheers, it doesn't go un-appreciated.
Webcams and front-facing phone cameras tend to mirror the image to emulate.. well, a mirror, since that's how most people are used to seeing themselves.
@@Hwyadylaw but that footage looks like a real camera, not a webcam, which is why it seems to me like it must be an active decision and not just the default thing the camera does.
Something to save a little time for you: console.log is not required in the console tools. just press enter on an expression, you'll see the result right after. this is why you see undefined print after your result on its own line, it prints the return value automatically. :)
I've never looked at malware before; it's super interesting. Thanks for sharing!
At 23:06... If your ultimate goal was to get the _0x502708 map object, couldn't you have executed that block in your dev tools and just printed it out? Especially since you know the method was just outputting string characters and was not inherently malicious.
Please correct me if there is something I'm overlooking here. Just a gut reaction at a potential time save
Also this video was beautiful and I love your editing style. This is incredibly educational and I have subscribed. Looking forward to seeing more of your thought process.
yeah, would have been a time save to let it write the commands up to the last two map entries actually using the activexobject.
I'm guessing she did it this way to keep it safe and accessible for the viewers.
A viewer might not be savvy enough to distinguish which parts of the code are safe to execute and which are not.
That would also explain why she would go through de-obfuscating the first two methods before using them even though they, to me, obviously had no code that could do harm.
A viewer following the workflow in this video will not get their system infected.
True, also in general the way she did it was very verbose to follow along and replicate with other code, so this will be more helpful to viewers.
Thank you! That was fun! Sounds like a thing I would like to do, I definitely want to learn more about this :)
Incredibly educational, and great production value. You're killing it. Keep it up!
impressive work !!!
This channel is very Under-rated 😯👍🏻
One interesting piece you skipped over was the use of the split fuction on the string. It was accessed as a property on the string, which let them store the name of the function "split" outside of code as a string. It didn't really do much obsfucating here, but it could do a lot with a more complex object.
Oh, and !![] and ![] could further deobsfucate to true and false 😅
23:30 Quicker way to do this: just copy and paste the definition of the variable _0x502708 into your console and then console.log the result.
Also, instead of concatenating strings in a loop, we can just replace activeX calls to console.log, run it and see what commands are executed
LOVE the effect of a tape fast-forward 😂
Great video, and great production value
It's been a few decades since I've done anything serious on Windows, so I was frankly surprised to learn that ActiveX is still a thing. We all thought it was a gaping security hole from day one, and I thought Microsoft was at-least disabling it by default now. Glad to see that it's deprecated (according to Wikipedia).
9:06 that’s a mistake.
if the app is writing to the arrays content, you basically made it readonly. enhanced obfuscation also messes with data storage location and could use morphing source code
JS tools tip for NPP won you a subscriber! Thanks a million, my favourite app just got better XD
Notepad ++ and MS Edge is such a based combo for development
I like the way how this was video instructed , thumbs up!!
Editing is amazing, but the content is off the charts. Amazing work 👏👏👏
Damn, this is very informative. I can't quite keep up with everything yet because I'm new to coding but it is very interesting, great video.
Es un vídeo qué muy explicativo y si vale oro este contenido, gracias.
Great video - these are all tricks I've used to deobfuscate API's I probs shouldn't be using .-.
If you know the code is safe to run, and have a bit more complex code that jumps thru many different libraries, executing and walking thru the code line by line helps a tone,
What you maybe reverse engineering maybe just one file, but seeing the external lib calls and filling in the values returned just like in the video rlly helps put the puzzle together, (of course gotta give props to browser Dev tools - when walking thru code can just hover over any variable to see the current value inside)
i love seeing this done in n++!
This is some seriously cool stuff. Subscribed :)
I loved seeing when the camera angle changed, it seems you really do have a bunch of old monitors buzzing away back there haha!
The double spaces on the command line and the 0 instead of 1 almost threw me off, lucky it was at the end
I love the Copland OS interface
You can invoke the expressions directly in devtools, instead of surounding it with console.log, if you do not surround it you will get the real string in dev friendly format, string parameters to console log are displayed as html in console losing whitespace information
You can also use VSCode with typescript language server, this will allow you to rename while respecting scope in cases which obfuscator might use the same var name for different values
not even sure whether that's an actual linux distro but it looks 10/10
brill!i feel like deobfuscating js code is a great exercise for a beginner as all source code is right there, just looking a tiny bit messier than a regular js code
Absolutely! It's also very encouraging to see the code quickly becoming more readable
I've seen obfuscated JS code that includes bit shifting, which is insanely difficult to reverse engineering.
For example:
// Original Code
let result = 160;
// Obfuscated Code
let result = (5
Insanely easy to reverse, look into AST.
@@kurdm1482well, yeah, you can look at the abstract syntax tree, but it still requires reversing engineering it.
This is so fascinating, thanks for sharing your competence!
Your kind is rare. I am working on a C decompiler, and will soon deal with optimized binaries and later with static obfuscation methods and I am thinking on how to automate deobfuscation. For JS it looks quite possible. You are basically doing some kind of constant propagation (with the help of runtime logs) and give sensible names. If someone would write a high-level JS optimizer, you could also get rid of unneccessary/pointless dead code, control flow, ... then its done. Basically adapting the GCC/CLANG optimization tricks to JS would make no JS secure.
Thanks, Laurie! Awesome video!
I'm stupid but why are you able to find + replace-all? Doesn't that risk renaming variables that are locally scoped that use the same name as other locally scoped variables in another function?
edit: like obviously it'd still work, I just feel like it'd mess with me a lot and it seems like it'd be better if the find-replace was scoped but idk, I don't RE malware.
Yeah, I too thought that was a little "reckless". Turned out this code didn't use the same name in different scopes but it could have, just to mess with reverse engineers.
Yes! I was wondering the same thing. I've messed up my own code so many times changing variable names with replaceAll. VSCode lets you rename variables automatically without messing up scope (and without affecting non-variable strings, which replaceAll can also mess up). The video creator is very smart, but not working the smartest way in this video
I simp.
....Okay, back to the video 🙏
really sick video, gonna try to learn more about this, and your set is so sick
Notepad++ and ActiveX... You're definitely from the past!🔮✨
Notepad++ is not the past. ActiveX is, but it is not she using it. Come on! Be polite
@@tommyovesen ?
For "repetitive" part: you can grep needed invocations and process them in the loop.
PS: I believe notepad++ supports macros to make life easier.
Laurie, your channel is genius
Amazing ReveЯsive design on channel 💯
28:41.
Were you supposed to put 1 there instead of 0?
I did this my job 1 or 2 years ago. Javascript is used a everywhere and obfuscated in very horrendous way. For me it was fun and even did some helper to avoid wasting too much time. As you cannot do this automaticaly, you have to do a lot of staff manually, finding the obfuscation fonctions is the most annoying part.
This was a great tutorial, Laurie!
I am using the same tool, the guy uses javascript-obfuscator. You are lucky the code is short, otherwise you need to make something for complex to retrieve all the strings.
I find it hard to concentrate by watching Laurie but at the same time I am enjoying that feeling
This was sick to watch!
my indian colleagues are the best obfuscation tool I ever know
3:45 The big array at line 80 looks like it'll be reassembled into a command to run a WShell script. I knew this wouldn't run in a browser because they no longer support ActiveX controls.
Nice work, Laurie. Of course there are many shortcuts possible all over the place, but that also increases the risk of errors. Refactoring piece by piece provides more confidence that you're on the right track. Is the original code available somewhere? I couldn't find it with just the hash.
Hello, i would recommend to the people watching this video to use a JavaScript AST manipulation tool for this kind of de-obfuscation.
Just with "copy propagation" and "constant folding" you will have much done in one go.
The switch technique however is maybe not handled as it would require loop unroll.
which tool would you recommend?
Babel is nice, there are a lot of transformations(plugins) available and you can write custom plugins as you encounter new obfuscation patterns.
@@grawuka6900 OK, thanks. But I thought you meant an interactive tool.
Never thought I’d see a serial experiments lain reference in a coding video.
Your background / set is a trip dude. Is all that retro gear real or are you using a greenscreen of some sort? If it’s real then you’ve got a really cool collection of… old computer stuff hahah
It's all real :)
9:19 The function is kind of doing what you're saying but not exactly. In the obfuscated version it's always returning the same instance of the string array. In the obfuscated version you're recreating the string array every time.
So if you mutate the result of the obfuscated function, you'll get the mutated version on the next call. This is not the case in the obfuscated one.
A way to reproduce what it actually does is move the declaration of the var_commandStringArray to the top of the file and just return the reference in the function. This would allow you to replace all calls to _0x1ecc() by var_commandStringArray and get rid of the function.
I noticed that too and made a similar comment. Although I think you mixed up "obfuscated" and "deobfuscated".
Love you videos! It would be super cool if you made a discord server with a mobile security focus!
I was pissed the second I saw the Lain intro, but usually security related videos piss me off quickly anyway so it's whatever. I was asking for it.